Authorization restriction for IK34

Dear Experts,
We want to restrict user from entering one plant reading from another in t-code ik34. Currently user can enter measurement document of all plant. We want to restrict the user plant wise. Our basis consultant is trying with authorization group(i_begrp). But not getting the desired result. Please suggest how to restrict it.
Regards,
Shivang

When I had this issue a while back, we found that you cannot restrict on plant for measurement documents.
One way to restrict it is to tie the measuring pionts to an authorization group. You can classify each authorization group into each plant. Then maintain these authorization groups in the measuring point in IK01 or IK02. These measuring points would be tied to the measurement documents and should show up in the trace.
I would also ask if the restriction is really required. Would it do that much damage if a person is able to touch other measurement documents. Some may say yes, others no.
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

  • Authorization restriction for Goods issue against an Order

    Hello All,
    We have a situation wherein the user is able to issue goods using tcode MIGO by choosing Goods issue --> Others and mentioning an order number that belongs to another plant in the account assignment tab and issues a material which belongs another plant.
    For eg we have material A that has been created for plant 1. The user issues the material (movement type 261)and the account is assigned to an order which has been created for plant 2.
    I could not find any authorization object that restricts this.
    I checked the objects M_MSEG_BWA and M_MSEG_WWA and he has authorizations only for plant 1 and all movement types.
    Any pointers to restrict this access will be appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Subramaniam Iyer

    Hi,
    MIGO transaction by default restricted with Plant.  If you say that the user A is having access to only Plant 1 & 3, but not for 2, please check the below authorization objects does not have any manual objects inserted into the Role and restricted with the value only in organization field.
    M_MSEG_LGO
    M_MSEG_WMB
    M_MSEG_WWA
    M_MSEG_WWE
    This issue may occur because if the objects are maintained manually in the role.  If so, when you check in the organization field, it may not be showing the value which are manually added into the manual object.
    Also, please check the other roles are assigned to the user.  If any of the other roles assigned to the user having any of the above objects with * value, this may provide the user to do the Goods movement for any plant.
    To check the issue, please go to SUIM and check the user under "Roles by Complex Selection Criteria" and make sure that you are checking the objects for the particular user.  This should be able to identify whether the user is getting access from any other roles assigned to the user.
    Regards
    Anandm

  • Authorizations: restrictions for InfoObjects and InfoProvider

    Hi Gurus,
    I am trying to define authorizations via RSECADMIN in 7.0 for a specific InfoObject and specific InfoProviders. The situation is: I want user USER1 to see only Company 4360 on Cube 'XXXXX', but he must be able to see all the Companies in all the other Cubes.
    I have used in RSECADMIN the icon "InfoCube Authorizations" to introduce the single Cube and corresponding single values for my Company, but it seems that the system use this restriction for all the Cubes.
    Please help me.
    Ciao.
    Riccardo.

    Problem solved.

  • Authorization restriction for CRM 2007

    Dear Experts,
    We are in process of defining the authorization matrix for CRM 2007 for end users who will be using Web UI.
    Here my requirement is the service orders created by USER1 should not be displayed by USER2 and vice-versa when they do a search in both Web UI and GUI in Tx CRMD_ORDER for service orders.
    Please let me know how can I acheive this and what is the auth. object for the same.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sharath

    Dear babu,
    If I understood your request, you want that, only one user will be able to access the document. If you want to do that, this is the answer:
    At tcode PFCG you shoud set:
    First you must set what type of document will be avaible to the user, in this case Z020.
    CRM_ORD_PR: PR_TYPE 'Z020',ACTVT '*'
    Next you must set which activities they will be able to do (notice, you must set the same field in the previsou object(
    CRM_ACT: ACTVT u2018*u2019
    And then you set which partner function or partner category are able to access the document, here is the main point !
    In this example I set that only users who has Partner Category (not partner function) Employee Responsible (std partner category 0008) are able to access the document
    CRM_ORD_OP: ACTVT '', PARTN_FCT '', PARTN_FCTT '0008'
    Here you can notice again field ACTVT, here you will set what user are able to do, "*" means everything, "1" = create, "2" = modify, etc. (I can see the list at PFCG, adding the auth. object to the PFCG profile).
    I notice only std partner function or partner category works with this object. I sent a message to sap support, and they confirm that, so if your user has Z partner funcition or category it is not possible to do that.
    Summary, your user must be present in the partner list of the document, and they must have a partner function or partner category std. It is possible to set together both values PARTN_FCT  and PARTN_FCTT, but I think it is not necessary.
    The easy way to do that is, user who will be able to access the document, must be the employee responsible.
    This help is very usefull
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm60/helpdata/en/4a/b9f63a8ab2c745e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Lalas
    ps.: As you should know, only one partner function must have partner category Employee Responsible, in the partner det. procedure, otherwise, you will get error message in your application.

  • Authorization restriction for Goods issue . others radio button in migo tcode

    Hello All,
    We have a situation wherein the user is able to issue goods using tcode MIGO by choosing Goods issue --> Others and  the movement type 201
    the above mentioning details i need to block the others tab only for specific user ids i have checked the MIGO objects But its not worked
    please give me solution for block the others button on the drop down box
    please find the attachment of screen shot its helpful to sort out the issue
    Best Regards
    suresh

    Dear Anandan,
    Please use trace t.code ST01 to fix the issue.
    You can restrict the movement type using the authorization object M_MSEG_BWA.
    If you can provide the step by step screens where you want to exactly restrict we can fix it.
    Regards,
    Venkatesh

  • Authorization restriction for bank details in FK03

    Hi,
    Please help me in restricting display of Bank details (payment transactions) in vendor master when we use transaction FK03 or XK03.
    Thanks,
    Nitish

    Hello Nitish,
    You can protect all general data (i.e. address data, payment transaction
    data, ...) with the authorization object F_LFA1_GEN. However, it is not
    possible to protect only bank data using authorization objects.
    As a workaround(!) for your requirement, you can do the following:
      1) Use the IMG Customizing tool (transaction SPRO) or transaction OB23
         directly to define Payment transactions data as "Suppress" within
         transaction FK03 and as "Display" within transaction XK03.
      2) The use of transaction XK03 should only be allowed to the managers,
         but not to the normal users who should use transaction FK03.
    Hope that helps,
    Jon

  • Authorization restriction for executing the ABAP queries

    Hi
    In ABAP queiries how the restriction can be done for where users should not execute /authorized
    of other plant or company code - Projects/ WBS/NWA and its related components. I tried the following methods but not working - seems something is missing .
    method 1) restricting based on the profit center ( free coding )
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'C_PRPS_PRC'
             ID 'PRCTR' FIELD PROJ-PRCTR
             ID 'PS_ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
    (or)
    method 2 -(free coding)
    *---Authorization for Company code entered by the users.
    *---This code will restrict users to see data for company
    *---codes which they are not authorized to.
    *---Select all the company codes based upon selection entered by the
    *---user
    SELECT bukrs
       FROM t001
       INTO TABLE li_bukrs
      WHERE bukrs IN z_bukrs.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    *---Clear Screen variable for Company code
       CLEAR z_bukrs.
       REFRESH z_bukrs.
    *---Filter and prepare Select options for Company code table to be
    *---passed to query. Table will only have values of company codes he is
    *---authorized to for display.
       LOOP AT li_bukrs INTO lwa_bukrs.
         AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'F_BKPF_BUK'
                           ID 'BUKRS' FIELD lwa_bukrs
                           ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '03'.
         IF sy-subrc = 0.
           z_bukrs-sign = 'I'.
           z_bukrs-option = 'EQ'.
           z_bukrs-low = lwa_bukrs.
           z_bukrs-high = space.
           APPEND z_bukrs.
         ELSE.
           lv_flag = 'X'.
         ENDIF.
       ENDLOOP.
    *---Give warning message to the user in case he is not authorized to see
    *---data for all the company codes that he has entered.
       IF lv_flag = 'X'.
         MESSAGE ID 'ZF_MSS_FNG' TYPE 'W' NUMBER '015'.
       ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    Just make sure that Z_BUKRS field is available in selection tab.
    Also, declare below mentioned variables in INITIALIZATION.
    DATA: li_bukrs TYPE TABLE OF bukrs,
           lwa_bukrs TYPE bukrs,
           lv_flag TYPE c.
    Kindly help if there is missing anything on the above or is there any other alternative.
    Regards
    PP

    Hi,
    Kindly help if there is missing anything on the above or is there any other alternative.
    Carlos is right about the Authorization check.
    If you further wants to explore something extra, just visit these links:
    1. http://help.sap.com/saphelp_NW70EHP1core/helpdata/en/52/671449439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/frameset.htm
    2. http://help.sap.com/saphelp_wp/helpdata/en/52/67129f439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
    3. http://help.sap.com/crmcg_en/5c/deaa74d3d411d3970a0000e82de14a/content.htm
    4. http://www.sap-img.com/bc042.htm
    May this information helps you.
    Regards.
    Deepak Sharma.

  • Authorization Restriction for Object Changeability :

    Hi ,
    How to restrict users from using Object changeability in Production System if they are given access to RSA1, even though the system is completely closed , with Object changeability, the users can still create a new Info package and upload data ?
    I have gone through the SDN and SAP documentation, but I could not find any such references.
    Looking forward to your valuable input on this.
    Regards,
    Ahmed.

    Hi there,
    You have an authorization object named S_RS_ADMWB (Data Warehousing Workbench - Objects).
    You can with that object restrict the several activities (display, execute, create, etc.) for different Datawarehouse InfoObjects (InfoPackage, etc.).
    Try to restrict that to the users.
    Diogo.

  • Authorization restriction for Transaction PK13N

    Hi @ all
    My colleagues and I are responsible for the authorizations in our system.
    Since few days we test the Kanban functions in SAP.
    In abovementioned transaction are two buttons "To Empty" and "To Full".
    Does anybody know if there is a possibility to restrict some users for these buttons?
    Thanks @ all!!
    Greets Kristin

    Hi Kristin,
    The "Save to Empty" and "Save to Full" buttons are screen elements and can't be restricted with the authorization objects.
    Further, below are the authorization object that are checked with PK13N transaction code:
    C_KANBAN     PP KANBAN Processing
    C_TCLA_BKA     Authorization for Class Types
    CPE_SETTIN     Commodity Pricing Engine: General Settings
    You can imply restriction on any of these.
    If you with to show/remove one of these buttons, you can achieve this with screen variants using SHD0 transaction code.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Raghu

  • Authorization restriction for material group field in MM02 for user role

    Dear All,
                 My client wants to restrict 'material group' field usage in MM02 for certain users.
                 How to achieve this task?
                 Kindly advice
    Thanks &Regards
    Thangavel Ganesh

    Hi all ,
    You can use authorization object advised by AKPT MM. For related transactions , you can benefit from MM Related Authorization Objects - How to Find out & Assign , thanks to Sudeep A
    Regards.
    M.Ozgur Unal

  • Authorization restriction for PM Order via PM activity Type.

    Dear PM Experts....
    There is a requirement to restrict order creation (Eg: PM07) for selected user group if they select particular PM Activity Type(ILART).
    Is it possible to restrict authorization in such a way and What are the Authorization Objects that i have to change?
    Thanks in advance..

    Hi,
    Use the authorization object I_INGRP for restricting at the Planner Group level along with the I_AUART.
    At activity level might not be possible.
    Thanks
    Sunil

  • Authorization restriction for purchase order release

    How to restrict the authorization for particular authorization object with respect to roles.
    Example:  I am having below three release roles for purchase order.
    1.     Regional Commercial Head
    Below objects are assigned to it.
    M_BEST_WRK u2013 Plant 1000 with value 02
    M_EINK_FRG u2013 with release code A1
    2.     Regional Commercial Head
    Below objects are assigned to it.
    M_BEST_WRK u2013 Plant 2000 with value 02
    M_EINK_FRG u2013 with release code A1
    3.     National Commercial Head
    Below objects are assigned to it.
    M_BEST_WRK u2013 All plants with value 02
    M_EINK_FRG u2013 with release code B1
    All the roles are for releasing a purchase order.  My requirement is I had assigned 1st and 3rd roles to a user.  That user should not be able to release a purchase order with release code A1 for plant 2000.
    How to make it possible?
    Pls help

    u have 2 aothorisation M_BEST_WRK and M_EINK_FRG
    while giving authorisation condsider both
    say for ex user 1  give authro for M_BEST_WRK all paants and M_EINK_FRG B1
    user 2  give authro for M_BEST_WRK 1000 and M_EINK_FRG A1
    user 3  give authro for M_BEST_WRK 2000 and M_EINK_FRG A1
    so the user authorised to particular authorisation will be able to release correct po only
    hope this helps

  • FCH7 Authorization Restriction for voiding the checks

    Hi Sap Guru,
    There is a requirement in FCH7 where we need to provide to User A - just to put the void reason and save and to User B- just to reprint the checks.
    Please let me know if any user exist for the same.
    Thanks,
    M

    It is not possibel to provide authorization at this level.

  • Authorization Restrictions for user

    Hi
    User has Sales Rep role and supposed to see only customers in the countries he is assigned to In this cas CN/HK
    But he can see customers in the US. Where can we see the restrictions and how to control this.
    We have ACE concpet also enable for our client. Does this is contolled by ACE., Please suggest us.
    Many Thanks
    Vijay

    vijay,
    Go through the blogs below and understand the ACE framework. then check for the zclasses developed and scheduled jobs which are recalculating these access rights periodically.
    /people/boris.dingenouts/blog/2006/09/18/the-concept-and-implementation-of-crm-ace
    /people/ravikiran.chittum/blog/2007/09/19/configuration-implementation-of-crm-access-control-engine-ace-part-1
    /people/ravikiran.chittum/blog/2007/10/01/configuration-implementation-of-crm-access-control-engine-ace-part-2

  • Authorization restriction for BP transaction

    Hi,
    We need to restrict the BP transaction access to user in the below mentioned way in our SRM system.
    1. Restricting BP access to all the users with display access.
    2. Restricting BP access to security users with create, change and display access.
    What is the main object for BP transaction for restricting access in the above mentioned scenarios?
    Here, we have observed one more issue like....
    Let say object-B_BUPR_BZT(not sure) is a main object for transaction-BP. If we restrict activity to 03 in that object, it will give display access when we are executing transaction-BP.
    Some of other transactions(like PPOMA_BBP) are there in SRM, those are also maintaining same object with all activities(create,change,Display).
    In this scenarios, how the above mentioned restriction is going to help the user.
    Please check and advice in this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    KKRao.

    > Let say object-B_BUPR_BZT(not sure) is a main object for transaction-BP.
    It may be a "main object" for BP, but that doesn't tell you much at all about the security aspects or where in the logic of the transaction it is used. This object is for example not a part of the business logic of transaction SE80, or that I am sure.
    If you have no clue, then start in SU21 and read the application help documentation on the transaction (to understand it's context) and the use-cases of the object - also to find the other transactions. Then you will become more sure.
    You also need to understand that in the same way the transactions, reports and the "real checks" are layers in the security, objects themselves can also be selective and layered in a conceptually consistent way, or (to make it more interesting...) transaction dependently.
    There are lots of shortcuts (even out-of-the-box roles which someone might try to sell you...) but ultimately if you use a SAP system to "build" your business processes, then you need a concept to secure your build. SAP owns the authority-checks in standard programs to enable the process to comply with legal requirements and some common sense.
    => So, you need to choose your transaction (or other entry point) carefully and understand the objects which they use.
    Cheers,
    Julius

Maybe you are looking for

  • New imac VS. 4 year old G5???

    Hello. I currently have a single processor 1.8ghz Power Mac G5. It is about 4 years old and running a little funny lately (im sure nothing yet another install and restore cant fix). I was looking at the specifications for the new imacs and noticed th

  • Mac Mini startup issue

    So, earlier tonight, my computer was acting a little strange (it seems to have been flaky after updating to 10.4.8 lately) and after restarting, I get the gray apple screen, and the spinning indicator, but nothing else happens, other than more spinni

  • How do you get podcasts to list by release date on iPhone?

    Read my whole question because I keep seeing people not doing so. So, podcasts through iTunes on the iPhone recently updated. Before when I downloaded podcast episodes, they would be by release date, in the music app under the specific podcast. For e

  • Query monitoring using AUDIT

    Hi all, DB version : 11.2.0 OS version : RHEL 5.5 I have enabled auditing at the database level. Can anyone let me know how could i find out which query was executed by the user 2 hours before. I am not sure how could i find the query using AUDIT. Ju

  • Firefox crashes when any facebook mafiawars link is clicked, it only works if i run firefox in safe mode. Why? & How do i fix it?

    after being auto-updated to version 15, firefox crashes when any facebook mafiawars link is clicked, tried versions 3.6.12 to 15 without any change and even updated java but it only works if i run firefox in safe mode. what happened and how to i fix