Auto Payment debit entries not considered

Dear All,
As per our practice we make the payment to the vendors 03 days in advance prior to due date for Cheque issuing formalities. While processing auto payment System takes Invoices of these 3 days but It does not consider debit notes which are due for recovery during these 03 days.
For Example, Payment made on 22.08.2010 (03 days advance ) due up to 25.08.10. In this payment bills covered due up to 25.08.2010. and Debit notes covered due up to 22.08.2010 instead of 25.08.2010.
please let me know how to consider all the debit notes.
regards
Ashish

any suggestions.

Similar Messages

CX debit entry

Dear All,
I am creating a SD invoice for new company code. when i checked accounting doc after creating a invoice, debit entry and credit entry get posted to same G/L account.
debit entry not get posted to customer account.
please let me know the possible reasons ? i have already checked cx.reconsilation account/pricing procedure and VKOA setting.
expecting some differnt idea
thanks

Dear Friend,
If you are using TAXINN procedure, then your Tax conditions would be either JIVP (VAT) or JCST (CST).
Now as you might be know, Sales & other revenue accounts are determined & posted thru GL accounts mentioned in VKOA (Assign GL Accounts).
But Tax Accounts are determined thry GL accounts mentioned in OB40 against account Key.
What you can do is While maintaining Condition records for VAT or CST, enter Tax Codes in Tax Code column.
Now go to OB40, select the account key mentioned in Pricing Procedure against Tax Conditions & mention required GL Accounts against required TAx Codes.
By doing the above you can have seperate GL accounts for VAT & CST... These accounts can also be seperate for each state...
Hoep this helps...
Give points if useful...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta
Mumbai
98700 10230

Debit Items not getting picked while making payment with F110

HI,
When making payment with F110, items with Debit balance is not getting picked.
Example:
Payment method is assigned in the Maser data.
For a particular vendor one item has a credit balance- posting key 31.
We have posted another JV with F-02 and debited that vendor with Posting key 21. (Payment Method is not entered in the line item)
When we run F110 the credit balance is picked and debit balance is being shown in exception list.
When we got to FB02 and insert payment method in debit line item and then again run the F110 then system pickes all line items and pays the net amount.
The question is why system is not considering Payment Method from Master Data in debit line item, while in credit line item it is picking payment method from the master data.
Do I need to do any setting for it so that it should automatically take payment method from master data even in case of Debit line items.
Regards
Sanjay

Hi All,
Thanks for your quick replies.
But it does not solve my problem.
When I am not assigning any payment method to either Debit or credit line items, system picks (payment method from Master data) for only credit line items and ignores debit line items.
But the problem is that when I assign payment method to debit line item (which is similar to what has been assigned to vendor Master Data) system groups both debit and credit line items and makes payment of only net amount.
My question was why system considered the debit line item for making payment if I manually enter payment method in the line item, if system has been designed only for out going payment. In my opinion It should have reacted similarly irrespective of whether payment method entered in the line item or not.
Regards
Sanjay

Auto payment enable in SAP (F110)-Check not generated

Hi All,
When I try to make payment via tcode f110, I specified bank which was assigned with a specific payment method in variant, system
auto selected all due invoices and make payment. Postings were successfully done but check number were not created.
However, when i made payment via tcode f-58, i specified the same bank which was assigned with a specific payment method. I
manually selected the due invoices and made payment. Posting were successfully done and check number were created
automatically by the system.
Any idea what could went wrong for F110 or any other area that i need to consider before i make auto payment.
Thanks
kanishka

Hi,
I was wondering if Business Area and Payment method supplements are valid in your scenario. Or even currency.
The way to find out why the check program (I reckon that you are using RFFOUS_C to print cheque) does not pick up the payment documents is to put only House bank/Account ID/cheque lot.
Woudl you like to try that?
Cheers
taro

Open Items not considered for Payment Lot

Hello Experts.
I have created some open items using FPE1. They are displayed as due in FPL9. But the same open items are not selected in FP06 for clearing. They are also not considered for clearing in a payment lot (FP05).
Can some one tell me what could be the reason for this
Best Regards
Venkat

If you have a clearing restriction, to be able to remove it when you change the document in FPE2 for example you need to activate that clearing restriction in:
Financial Accounting > Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable > Basic Functions > Open Item Management > Define Modifiable Clearing Restrictions
If you don't do that you cannot manually change it.
Adriano.
PS: Again are people in these forums that put answers to be in the statistics... GOD..

MM Service Entry Sheet Release Problem - Plant Not Considered

Dear Experts,
I have a problem in Service Entry Sheet Release as it does not consider plant although it is maintained in Release Strategy.
I have created 1 Class for Service Entry Sheet Release.
This class contains 3 Characteristics, 1st for Plant, 2nd for Value of Services and 3rd for Purchasing Group.
Now the problem is that during the Entry Sheet Release, system does not consider the Plant in deciding the Release Strategy.
It considers the first Release Strategy found for Purchase Group and Value of Service combination, thus ignoring the Plant Characteristic.
Characteristic for Plant is having 'Released' Status
Please suggest what to do so that the Plant is also considered in Release Strategy.

Dear Charlie,
Thanks for your reply.
When I go to CL40N and check then system gives correct Release Strategy as it considers plant there.
But when actually the Entry Sheet is created/saved then system gives wrong release strategy as it does not consider Plant.
Let me tell you that my Release Strategies do contain common Purchase Groups but the Plants are different. So each Release Strategy is unique in this way.
But during Service Entry Sheet Creation system does not consider Plant in determining Release Strategy.
Please Help.

HT5552 are debit cards not accepted as one of the payment methods?

are debit cards not accepted as one of the payment methods?

This is a user to user forum, so why, we couldn't answer.
I found the following for you:
The Mac App Store, App Store and iBookstore services (the "Stores") accept credit cards issued by banks in India or Content Codes as forms of payment. iTunes may obtain preapproval for an amount up to the amount of the order. Billing occurs at the time of or shortly after your transaction. If you are using 1-Click purchasing, your order may be authorized and billed in increments during one purchasing session, so it may appear as multiple orders on your statement. When making purchases, content credits are used first; your credit card is then charged for any remaining balance.
This is a long link, but if you read throught it, you'll find more information: http://www.apple.com/legal/itunes/appstore/in/terms.html
Otherwise, you should contact Apple Direction for an answer.

Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

Dear Friends,
In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
Regards
Shammi

VENDOR AUTO PAYMENT

Dear gurus,
I had some problems about making auto payment in AP as follow:
1) When making a down payment, the document is automatically block for payment. It cause difficulties when I want to make auto payment, I have to manual change a lot of documents. Would you please tell me how I can make the down payment document automatically unblock for payment?
2) When I have an invoice with special GL Indicator, SAP separate it with the normal invoice (the invoice with reconcile account in vendor/customer master data). Is it possible if I donu2019t want to separate these kinds of invoice? (Ex: when making auto payment for vendor, I want to make a sum of payable amount, not separate in two lines base on credit account)
Thanks for your answers
Edited by: Duy Le on Nov 21, 2011 4:43 AM

Dear,
Thanks for your answer. I had changed documents by mass change function.
But question 2, problem about making auto payment in AP as follow :
I have 4 documents.
Doc1 : Invoice (not SGL) : Credit vendor 1000 USD (reconciliation account 331000)
Doc2 : Invoice (SGL) : Credit vendor 500 USD (3310100)
Doc3 : Invoice (SGL) : Debit vendor 100 USD (1312000)
Doc4 : Down payment (SGL : A) : Debit vendor 600 USD
Run F110 Auto payment --> System seperate 2 payment
Payment 1 include doc1
Payment 2 include doc2, 3
Payment 1 : doc1 --> OK
Payment 2 : doc2, 3,4 --> red (credit 500, debit = 100+600). No posting for payment 2
But my customer require 1 payment include document 1,2,3,4
Payment amount will be : 800 (Debit : 100 + 600, Credit : 1000 +500)
How to create one payment in this case for one vendor ?
Please help !!!
Edited by: Duy Le on Nov 21, 2011 11:34 AM

Auto-Payment Setup

When I try to set up auto-payment, I am denied, and get the message: We are currently experiencing difficulties with Automatic Direct Debit enrollment. Please try again later. We apologize for the inconvenience. I have been getting this message for the last two weeks now. When I try to set up auto-payment with my gas company and electric company, I've no problems, only with Verizon.

It is currently 11/13/2014, and I also have been getting this message when trying to update my auto payment settings these past couple of days. It is extremely frustrating being presented with a website which is extremely slow and can't even do anything as basic as let me update my information despite trying 10 times over 2 days. Note to your web developers: cool graphics and loading animations don't mean squat if it takes 5-10 seconds for every page to load and the page doesn't even work after it loads. I would rather the ugliest web site in the world if it means that pages loaded < .5 seconds and I could enter my changes, save, and get out as quick as possible.

Debit entries are missing in table J_1ITRNACC

Dear CIN experts,
I have very strange problem in case of Capital purchase.
My excise posting for capital goods is BED       100 Rs.
                                                              Ecess       2 Rs.
                                                          H.Ecess        1 Rs.
But at the time of excise posting in J1iex Accounting simulation is            BED   101.5   Cr
                                                                                On Hold BED     50.0   Db
                                                                                BED     51.5   Db
System is not considering 103 Rs amt for BED.
After clicking on post system gives above error Debit entries are missing in table J_1ITRNACC.
Please suggest for this problem.
Regards,
Gitesh

Hi,
SPRO-Tax on goods movement-India-Specify excise accounts per transactions.
Check for GRPO & CAPE, whether Dr & Cr accounts are maintained properly or not.
I think, entry is missing here.
Regards,
Piyush

Target sost calculation not considered Current cost estimate in KKBC_ORD

Hi All,
We have an case wherein it observed that target cost calculation on SFG is wrong
in KKBC_ORD where system does not considered the current cost estimate.
We have all the necessayry customisation in place for Target cost version 0 for current cost estimate.
Below is detailsed case.
1 Process Order created in Dec 2011
2 Price Released to Mat master on 01.01.2012
3 Goods movement,Operation confirmad Material Issues, FG qty delivered @ std cost 0n 04.01.2012
4 Order Technically completed (TECO)
5 KKS1/KKS2 will be done at month end.
We know that In Process order, after deliver of FG the target cost on FG is not getting calculated,target cost will be updated only after calculating variance. it does
not calculate after delivery of finished goods, On Execution of KKS1/KKS2 variance will be calculated the target cost on FG and will be updated.
In process order (COR3 --> Cost analysis) Target cost ,Actual cost and Planned cost are calculated based on the following:
Total Plan Cost = Std Cost the material required to Produce X Planned Qty of the required material
Target Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Std Qty of material required to produce, for Produced Actual Qty
Actual Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Actual Qty of material consumed, for Produced Actual Qty
The variance is calculated on SFG and assemblies based on the difference between actual and target cost in KKBC_ORD. During creation of process order, the plan cost
will be updated with the valid standard cost upon the creation.
The target cost on SFG and Assemblies is only generated when there is good receipt from production order into inventory.
The target cost is generated using the valid / recent costing run for the correspondence SFG in KKBc_ORD.
All other target costs showed in COR3 (Menu Go to > Costs > Analysis) or KKBC_ORD before doing KKS1/2 is only statistical- However in our case Traget cost calculated
on SFG in KKBC_ORD not relevant with current cost estimate.
However Actual cost and Planned cost Calculated correctly.
Actual Cost= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
Planned cost= Std Cost the material required to Produce (6.572,12) X Planned Qty (12.415)= 81.592,87
However Target cost is not considering the current cost estimate;It should be - Current Standard cost of the materilal(5.624,88)X Target Qty(13.958,124)=78512.07.
But Errorneously Target cost is showing 67.383,59 which causing unfavorable variance to standard.
It should be 78512.07-77.021,48= 1490.59 favourable var to standard in KKBC_ORD.
Any help,suggestion and input would be highly appreciated.
Thanks with Regards
Subrata

hi
target cost is your standard cost* actual confirmed quantity, not the standard quantity required
the variance calculated will be always the actual debit to the production order- actual credit of the production order
your actual credit for the process order is std cost* actual quantity delivered to the inventory= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
actual debit to the process order is total actual cost which you can see in COR3 report .
By the way for which period you have calculated variance, target cost will be calculated based on that months standard cost
krishna

F110 Auto payment with Check in foreign currency and Doc currency is LC

Hi Guru,
When I try to use auto payment for document currency in local currency, while check is foreign currency, it always in the expception list, could you advice how to handle this scenario. thanks.

Hi
From the log you mentioned check for the following things:
In FBZP -bank determinationin Ranking order---Pymt-C with currency USD and rank order 1 and housebank has been mentioned.
In bank accounts in the dialogue module below ranking order the entries are made for bank account for the above.
and in available amounts make the suficient amount available for this bank
Also Check whether the Payment method C and the housebank details are mentioned in Vendor master record.
Regards
Aravind
Assign points if useful

Payment term issue "error payment term is not defined"

I have created a new payment term, and incorporated in customer master and created sales order . payment term is getting populated in sales order with an error "payment term is not defined". Please help to resolve.'
David

There can be many possibilities for this error, in tcode OBB8,
- the terms of payment is not marked for customer.
- date limits are not mention properly.
- if the installments are not config properly
Or
Try it putting manually in to the sales doc.
If problem persists, take assistance of FI team member to sort out the error.
Also, refer following SAP Notes:
- 66529 F5839 Payment term & not defined
- 598025 Work method terms of payment for condition records
- 1180397 enterprise SOA conversion/Supplement to Note 117317
- 311514 No payment method for installment terms of payment
- 649567      EDI: incorrect baseline date for payment
- 208023      Posting bill doc ->FI:incor cash discount rate used
- 391939      Entries ignored with warning messages in sales document
Thanks & Regards
JP

F110 - Message Payment proposal could not be carried out

Hi All,
Need help..
In the F110 Payment proposal when executed is showingh error
Payment proposal could not be carried out.
The log says
" Overlap with payment run 25.02.2009 DOREE     .... the execution of the payment program is terminated     .
I checked the payment proposal for 26.02.2009 and for that no parameters have been entered and it shows status as " No parameters entered as yet ".
But when I went to menu path , there is no option to delete this run.
How do I getaway with this previous run which has problems..?
Regards,
Jaya

Hi ,
table "reguh" doesn't have any entries pertaining to this payment proposal.
It is just that parameters are entered and proposal is being run.
proposals are not yet created. I believe in the process it is hitting an error and then coming out saying
proposal canot be carried out.
Tried the previous solution by having the additional log parameters and all.
But still log only shows :
Log for proposal run for payment on 26.03.2009, identification DORE
Overlap with payment run 25.02.2009 DOREE
... the execution of the payment program is terminated
End of log
How to delete this payment run 25.02.2009 DOREE
thanx
Jaya

Auto Payment debit entries not considered

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for