CX debit entry

Dear All,
I am creating a SD invoice for new company code. when i checked accounting doc after creating a invoice, debit entry and credit entry get posted to same G/L account.
debit entry not get posted to customer account.
please let me know the possible reasons ? i have already checked cx.reconsilation account/pricing procedure and VKOA setting.
expecting some differnt idea
thanks

Dear Friend,
If you are using TAXINN procedure, then your Tax conditions would be either JIVP (VAT) or JCST (CST).
Now as you might be know, Sales & other revenue accounts are determined & posted thru GL accounts mentioned in VKOA (Assign GL Accounts).
But Tax Accounts are determined thry GL accounts mentioned in OB40 against account Key.
What you can do is While maintaining Condition records for VAT or CST, enter Tax Codes in Tax Code column.
Now go to OB40, select the account key mentioned in Pricing Procedure against Tax Conditions & mention required GL Accounts against required TAx Codes.
By doing the above you can have seperate GL accounts for VAT & CST... These accounts can also be seperate for each state...
Hoep this helps...
Give points if useful...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta
Mumbai
98700 10230

Similar Messages

Is it possible to add value date field in the debit entry?

Hi gurus,
I'm an abapper and struggling to be an FI consultant since I have no one to consult with. Here's my issue:
I want to add the Value Date field in a GL acct debit entry. I used optional in Field status group. It doesn't appear unless if I change the posting key to credit. But if I change it to required entry, an error appears " Rules for posting key 40 and acct 115-30-002 set incorrectly for "VALUT" field . Did I miss anything? As much as possible, I don't want to use the other GL Account (a credit entry) since I dont need it in the program flow.
Need an expert explanation on this. Sorry I only have limited knowlege with regards to FI concepts.

Hi
Feild status at entry time looks for the following combination
S- Supressed
D- Display
R- Required
O- Optional
System looks for this above combination at first in Posting Key and then in FSV of account which we enter. For this partical purpose the the feilds in posting key are kept optional.
Check the feild status of posting key & account T-code FBKP.
thanks
Colin Thomas

Missing PArt II entry in cenvat register for debit entries through "j1ih"

While passing debit entries through tcode "J1ih" Part II entry is not generated in cenvat register, but in case of credit entries the part II entry no is generated. What could be the reason for the same? How do we resolve this issue?

In J1IH, Other Adjustment is to adjust all Debit entries and Additional Excise is to adjust all credit entries.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

AR: How to default two debit entries in the AR transactions window

Hi,
Is it possible to default two debit entries in the AR transactions window - invoice processing. How is it implemented?
Thanks!
Regards,
Mangvoc

Hi,
Generally, in AR, only one Receivable Account is debited irrespective of no. of Revenue or Tax lines.
But using SLA Setup, we can generate multiple Receivable lines.
We in our project, used Multi-Fund Receivable JLDs in SLA Setup to do that. these are generally used by Public Sector companies for Fund Accounting.
Please refer to Receivables User Guide. Multi Fund examples are provided in the last section.
There are two ways to generate Multiple Receivable Lines. Balance Method and Account Method. Pls refer to SLA User guide also.
regards,
guru

Posting thro J1IEX error - DEBIT ENTRY missing in table J_1ITRNACC

Hello,
While posting Cenvat Credit in J1IEX, the system is giving error as "Customization for DEBIT ENTRY missing in table J_1ITRNACC".
- "The customization details have not been maintained for this company".
When checked thro' SPRO>IMG>Logistics-General>Tax on goods movement>India>Account determination>Specify excise accounts per excise transaction', it shows all debit, credit entries for excise transaction type 'GRPO'.
Kindly suggest me what else need to be checked? Part I entry is already done during MIGO.
Thanking in advance.
Regards
Ratna

Dear Velu & Pankaj Singh,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
We already had setting for the following.
GRPO CR Credit CLEAR CENVAT clearing account
GRPO DR Debit ONHOLD CENVAT on hold account
GRPO DR Debit RG23AED RG 23 AED account
GRPO DR Debit RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
GRPO DR Debit RG23BED RG 23 BED account
GRPO DR Debit RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
The above is also maintained for sub trn type 'IP'
But we do not have any entry for SED account i.e. record does not exist for GRPO DR Debit RG23SED RG 23 SED Account.
The excise entries contains BED account, AED account, ECS account and AT1 account as SHE CEss account.
Pl. suggest.
Regards
Ratna

Where to find debit entry for planned activities through cost centre?

hello experts,
our client would like to know the impact of planned activities cost debit entry. the scenario is as follows.
1. at the year begining we are planning activity hrs against any cost centre.
2. respective activity hours are being confirmed through PP/PM orders.
this time orders are being credited and cost centres are being debited for the activty prices.
Now the question is tracability of credit entry wrt corresponding entry debit entry in the cost centre.
Can anyone help me out?
Regards,
Varsha.

Hi,
Let break this issue.
1. If you maintain KP06, with reference to CE / CC / Activity, you get debit entries for the relevant cost centers
2. If you maintain KP26 Planned Activities and Planned Rates, you get credit to the relevant cost centers
So in the S_ALR_87013611 report referred to above, you would get both debit and credit to the cost centers in Plan Costs column + you can check the plan activities in the below section.
As against this actuals:
1. When you post your expenses to the cost centers / carry out assessment or distribution cycles for production cost centers (linked to the activity types), you ge the actual debits.
2. When you confirm the operations of the production orders, you get the credit to the cost centers.
Hope this clarifies your doubt.
Cheers!!

Debit entries are missing in table J_1ITRNACC

Dear CIN experts,
I have very strange problem in case of Capital purchase.
My excise posting for capital goods is BED       100 Rs.
                                                              Ecess       2 Rs.
                                                          H.Ecess        1 Rs.
But at the time of excise posting in J1iex Accounting simulation is            BED   101.5   Cr
                                                                                On Hold BED     50.0   Db
                                                                                BED     51.5   Db
System is not considering 103 Rs amt for BED.
After clicking on post system gives above error Debit entries are missing in table J_1ITRNACC.
Please suggest for this problem.
Regards,
Gitesh

Hi,
SPRO-Tax on goods movement-India-Specify excise accounts per transactions.
Check for GRPO & CAPE, whether Dr & Cr accounts are maintained properly or not.
I think, entry is missing here.
Regards,
Piyush

Create debit entry in DFKKOP during Return processing

Hi,
I have a requirement where an debit entry with particular main/sub needs to be created in DFKKOP during return processing. Can anyone have idea how we can approach for this requirement? Any FQEvent and FM/BAPI for debit entry creation.
Thanks in advance,
Murtuza

Let me explain the exact requirement. Actually this requirement is a suggested solution of the below issue.
In our system, there is an extra charge called NC charges along with consumption for selected accounts.
So with consumtion line item in DFKKOP, there is NC line item having main/sub for example as 999/S*
Now payment is made with full amount (consumption + NC charge), then system clears both consumption+NC items with payment and also creates one more line in DFKKOP with main/sub as 999/A* having the exact amount of 999/S* item. (I dont know the reason for this logic and how it is implemented)
Issue comes when Return is processed for the above payment. It removes clearing status of consumption+NC items and clears payment document with return document. But here is fails to create debit entry for 999/A* item (as it was created extra with payment). So my requirement is to create this line during Return. Otherwise it shows reconciliation difference during G/L posting for NC business unit.

Credit and Debit entries in Stock transfer

Hi,
In stock transfer (Between two plants with in one company code) pricing procedure we have added 4 condition types,
In the accounting document entries follows like this:
material price is credited on sending plant
total value (Material price+ 4 conditions value) debited on receiving plant
and 4 conditions values individually credited on receiving plant , upto this part system is showimg in the accouting document.
but my client is asking that above 4 conditions values should shown on debit part of sending plant in the same accounting document it self, how can i over come this issue can any body help me.
Thanks & Regards.
Edited by: vijay vijay on Dec 29, 2009 6:09 AM

Who/what is "it" in "it would like to create"? What does SAP "block"? What exactly is an issue?

Doing Extra Credit / Debit entries during INV verification itself

This is a tricky requirement hitting MM & FI simultaneously.
Whenever you do MIRO posting thru MIR7 ( Parking ) , for a particular service orders ( Doc type ) , there is a need to pass extra credit or debit to same vendor simultaneously rather unless that Credit / Debit is generated in FI for same vendor against that particular Bill & Miro , it should not allow to save MIR7 transaction.
In std SAP first MIR7 is to be saved & if at all any extra credit / debit effect is to be given , we have to pass thru FI entry.
But contractors bill verification dept wants to have very tighter control on this & hence some amount of development is required.
One of the approaches to solution:- IN MIR7 at time of saving it should activate one BADI / User exit thru which either FB65 or may be some Z transaction to be called for that vendor as well as that work order. All extra credit / debit is to be performed & then MIR7 is to be parked / saved.
One report is required to know the details of those miros for which such extra credit or debit is given before entire things get posted to Vendors liability.
Please have a solution & Technical feasibility.

Issue resolved

Auto Payment debit entries not considered

Dear All,
As per our practice we make the payment to the vendors 03 days in advance prior to due date for Cheque issuing formalities. While processing auto payment System takes Invoices of these 3 days but It does not consider debit notes which are due for recovery during these 03 days.
For Example, Payment made on 22.08.2010 (03 days advance ) due up to 25.08.10. In this payment bills covered due up to 25.08.2010. and Debit notes covered due up to 22.08.2010 instead of 25.08.2010.
please let me know how to consider all the debit notes.
regards
Ashish

any suggestions.

Correction in cenvat on hold account, debit entry to be posted

Dear Friends,
During PGR, Correct entry is
BED - Rs 25600+
CESS - Rs 512+
HCESS - Rs 256+
CENVAT ON HOLD - Rs 26368+
CENVAT CLG ACCOUNT - Rs 52736-
But one document found with the following below mentioned entries -
BED - Rs 25600-
CESS - Rs 512-
HCESS - Rs 256-
CENVAT ON HOLD - Rs 26368-
CENVAT CLG ACCOUNT - Rs 52736+
Now correction is required, RG23 entries i will correct by J1ih, regarding Cenvat on hold, anyone advice, how can be corrected.
Thanks
Madhukar

like u have done following enrty
cenvat on hold     115 +
RG23 BED     100 +
RG23 ECS        10 +
RG23 H CESS    5 +
cenvat clearing account   230 -
now u want to reverse it right
then u will first have to go to J2I8 and tahe the credit of 115 cenvat on hold account
so that
RG23 BED     100 +
RG23 ECS        10 +
RG23 H CESS    5 +
will come to RG 23 C register on credit side
so ur RG23C registure will have
RG23 BED     200 +
RG23 ECS        20 +
RG23 H CESS    10 +
now use J1IH other Adj select Rg23C
for amount
BED     200
ECS        20
H CESS    10
so that the entry will be passed
RG23 BED     200 -
RG23 ECS        20 -
RG23 H CESS    10 -
cenvat clearing account   230 +
this is the std sap way to reverse the Captial credit taken
hope this helps

Debit entries in part 2 register for rejected materials

Hi,
GR posted, part1 and part2 posted. Later material rejected, and with reference to rejected material document we have created Excise invoice (thru T.Code J1IS).
We observed part1 register get updated, but part 2 register has not updated. But entries observed in the table J_1Ipart2(but with register type is 'D' despatch type).
Please advice, how can we get updated in part2 register??
Regards,
Sattuj

Hi Satuj,
Process you are following is absolute fine. If you see accouting entries in J1is these are reversed entries from register part 2.Only you need to check the proper GL code if they are assigned in customizing.This you can check in IMG>logistic general> tax on goods movement path --> India --> Account determination --> Specify excise gl code as per escise TT .
Here you check the GL entries with respect to excise TT OTHR
I hope you will find your solution
Regards
Vivek Sharma
-- Reward if helpful

Debit and credit entry of items in repair order after DP90

Dear All,
From the repair order we create a service order, followed by operations and components in service order. We do a DP90 after completing the service order and see that there are entries for in repair order. Once again we go back to service order and delete one of the material not required, do a DP90 and what we see is, we have a negative entry for the item that is deleted.
I am not from CS background so request for lill explanation, why is system behaving in such a manner, to remove these entried from repair order what is the correct method. I can delete it directly but i am sure that is not the right way.
Please suggest in detail if possible.
Thanks
Deepak

Hi Pete,
I've been reading some of your posts and feel you might be able to help me with an issue regarding the "debit memo" indicator issue during DP90 processing for a repair order.
In our company we do just the standard repair: create repair request, return the material, generate service order then do RRB billing through DP90. DP90 adds sub items to repair order, which is fine. The problem is if I go to the repair overview screen from the main item, I don't see lines with "debit memo" indicator there for the sub items added by DP90 transaction - meaning if the sub items are added through DP90, there is no entry in the repair overview table with "debit memo" checkbox. Then if I look into COPA, I don't see planned revenue on the main item - the prices on those sub items don't get picked up as planned revenue. After I do billing, the actual revenue does go up to the main item and seen in COPA. Thus I have a "negative order backlog" caused by zero planned revenue.
I did some testing manually adding items with "debit memo" checked in the repair overview screen. Then sub items were added to repair order and I saw planned revenue on my main item. This made me wonder why items generated by DP90 don't have corresponding "debit memo" entry under repair overview screen.
We need to have the planned revenue picked up so we don't have negative backlog value after actual revenue is billed. I want to find out if the issue is caused by the missing "debit" entry in the repair overview screen or some other reason. If that's the reason, how to get the debit memo entry generated under repair overview screen?
Hope I have explained my problem clearly. Could you please shed some light on this?
thanks in advance!
Meng

Accounting entry against Excise invoice not created for Service Tax sales

Dear all,
I am facing one problem related to accounting entry against excise invoice not created, for service tax sales scenario in SEZ plant.
Accounting entry against billing document is generated,which contains revenue account-Debit entry,service tax 10% --Debit entry,ECS-Service tax 2% --Debit entry, SECess Service Tax 1% --Debit entry & Sundry Debtors (Reco) - Domestic(Customer receivable reconciallation) account-Credit entry.
But after generating excise invoice, accouning entries not generated for clearing of Cenvat suspense entry(i.e.service tax 10% ,ECS-Service tax 2% , SECess Service Tax 1%) which is generated during billing document.
Plz. suggest step by step guideline to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Mukesh Pardeshi

Hi ReazuddinMD,
thanks for your reply and support...I checked all the entries/accounts maintained correct.. but the Accounting entrys against Excise invoice not created..
Now i am geeting error as below at the time of saving Excise invoice,
No account is specified in item 0000000001
Message no. F5670
Diagnosis
No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
System Response
The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
Procedure
A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.

CX debit entry

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for