Automate Your Intercompany Reconciliation Process in ECC

Hi
Can any one provide me this document "Automate Your Intercompany Reconciliation Process in ECC "
your help is very much appreciated.
Thanks and Regards
SH

Hi SH,
Please import the transport files attached to note 863630. This will ensure that you have the most recent corrections as well as the missing IMG paths. Please note that documentation for setting up the new ICR functionality is also attached to note 863630.
It should resolve your inquiry
Best Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Similar Messages

Intercompany reconciliation process in ECC 6.0

Hi
Can anyone guide me on how to understand intercompany reconciliation process in ECC 6.0? I have tried but could not understand.
Thanks in Advance

Hello,
If you have been using F.2E you should probably review note 1180060 ( https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1180060 ) as an introduction.
It is necessary to set up some ICR specific details with the new solution. But if you use customizing generation as described in note 1172591 ( https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1172591 ) migrating to the new solution should not be too hard...
Best regards,
Ralph

Intercompany Reconciliation process 003 - Sender Ledger

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to set up configuration for IC reconciliation process. In the step define reconciliation process attributes, do I have to mention any sender ledger for ICR process 003? I read that the sender ledger field is not mandatory for ICR process 003. If we leave this field empty the reconciliation program will consider entries from BKPF and BSEG tables.
My current client has reconciliation system same as sender system. There is a productive company code running on the same client of the same system.
Currently there are two ledgers defined ZA and ZB.
ZA - named as FI ledger and
ZB - named as SPL reporting ledger.
Questions:
1./ In the ICR configuration, Do I have to mention one of the current ledgers (ZA or ZB) in the sender ledger field in the configuration? If so what will be the impact?
2./ Can I leave the sender ledger field blank in the configuration? If so, what will be the impact.
I am trying to read through the documentation in SAP notes (1172591 and 863630) but I am unclear of what is needed to be configured in this field.
Any feedback will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Ram

Hello Ram,
For processes 001 and 003 you should leave the sending ledger field empty unless you want to transfer information from document splitting to ICR from the general ledger.
If you specify a sending ledger the program will try to retrieve additional details from the sender ledger specified. But this only makes sense if you are using New GL with document splitting.
Best regards,
Ralph

Intercompany Reconciliation (ICR) process reports

Hi,
I'm setting up Intercompany Reconciliation with New Ledger ECC6 and i wonder if there is any report giving track to what is automatically reconciliated by all 3 processes. Is anyone aware?
Thanks in advance,
Alix
Edited by: Alix Piot on Jan 29, 2009 4:31 PM
Edited by: Alix Piot on Jan 29, 2009 4:32 PM

Hi
it must be always Automatically Reconciliation in any solutions all Intercompany transactions " This is Cross-System"
●      Start reconciliation run automatically (required)
●      Check status of reconciliation run (optional)
●      Perform manual reconciliation (required)
●      Make adjustment postings (optional)
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c3/f0ab1a6dbe44a0b4fe990d329f29bc/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/DE/16/227c38a7c36259e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Regards
Edited by: Saif Ali Sabri on Feb 2, 2009 10:55 AM

GL Reconciliation process in Infomratinca for Financial analytics

Hi Guys,
I am implementing OBIA Financial Anlytics for the first time, need your valuable input for below issue.
I am trying to understand the GL reconciliation process withing OBIA Fianancial Analytics. As per the document which Oracle has given, I understood that for this process to happen we need GL account mapping to Group_Account_Num (Using file_group_acct_codes_ora.csv, file_group_acct_names.csv, file_grpact_fstmt.csv files).
According to the configuration guide;
By mapping your GL accounts against the group account numbers and then associating the group account number to a Financial Statement Item code, you have indirectly associated the GL account numbers to Financial Statement Item codes as well. This association is important to perform GL reconciliation and to ensure the subledger data reconciles with GL journal entries.
Also it has given one mapping for Financial Statement Item Codes and Base Fact tables. Now my understanding says, all the detail entries of GL AP should get recorded into to W_AP_XACT_F table, and if it is a GL AR entry it should get recored into W_AP_XACT_F and likewise for COGS, REVENUE, TAX and OTHERS.
But currenly in our system, I can see all the entries (AP, AR, COGS, REVENUE, TAX and OTHERS entries) are there in all detail table (W_AP_XACT_F, W_AR_XACT_F, W_GL_COGS_F, W_GL_REVENUE_F, W_TAX_XACT_F, W_GL_OTHER_F table.
Can anybody knows if this is correct behaviour or I am doing some mistake in the configuration.
Thanks in Advance,
Kashi

you need to configure those three files to get the data in to BI and report them.
file_group_acct_codes_ora.csv : you need to pull all your natural GL accounts from EBS and feed them to this file. this file specifies each gl account and its behavior like whether it is a Payable entry or Receivable or Cash or PPE etc. so that you can view the data in payable, receivables etc dashboards with appropriate group totals.
the group codes you define here like AP, AR, CASH, etc must be defined in file_group_acct_names.csv, which is master file for Account groups.
file_group_acct_names.csv: This defines master set of group names you are using in your organization like AP, AR, CASH, PPE etc. these groups intern tagged to a financial statement codes like Revenue, TAX etc. so that you can find what is the total revenue or tax or AP etc for a specific period for a business unit.
file_grpact_fsmt.csv: This a master file containing Financial statement item codes like Revenue, Tax.
file_group_acct_codes_ora.csv >-- file_group_acct_names.csv >--file_grpact_fsmt.csv
(GL ACC NUM) (GROUP ACC NUM) (FSTMT ITEM CODE)

Questions on ICR reconciliation process 002 (functionality)

Dear all,
I am implementing ICR reconciliation process 002   and I have some
questions regarding process's behaviour and functionality. I have set
u201CDefine Rules for Document Assignments" as following:
1   POPER       Posting period    = Equal     POPER       Posting
period
10 RTCUR       Transaction currency    = Equal     RTCUR
Transaction currency
20 TSL   Transaction Currency    -1 Opposite Amount (Only for Value
Fields)   TSL   Transaction Currency
4/I need to reconcile accounts (process 002) not only for GL accounts w/o
open items but also Open Items GL accounts and vendor and customer GL
accounts (reconciliation accounts).
I do not need to manage open items nor vendor customer items (which would
be supported with processes 001 and 003); I just need to reconcile these
accounts as if they were GL accounts. I have tested in my test client and
seems to work. Is it possible?
Cheers

Hello Rafael,
The advantage of using process 001 or 003 is that you get a clear overview of the unpaid receivables and payables taking key date information into account. This is why the recommended procedure for dealing with payables and receivables is to use process 001 or process 003. You basically have a different angle when analyzing open items...
Having said all this it is possible to include any type of account in process 002. All you need to do is to not be quite as restrictive in your ledger selections. Then other line items will be posted to your ledger and can be analyzed within process 002. If this is what you need then go ahead and do it. Just make sure that you are sure your customer does not want to analyze receivables and payables on a different level...
Hope this helps,
Ralph

Questions on ICR reconciliation process 002

Dear all,
I am implementing ICR reconciliation process 002   and I have some questions regarding process's behaviour and functionality. I have set u201CDefine Rules for Document Assignments" as following:
1     POPER     Posting period     = Equal     POPER     Posting period
10     RTCUR     Transaction currency     = Equal     RTCUR     Transaction currency
20     TSL     Transaction Currency     -1 Opposite Amount (Only for Value Fields)     TSL     Transaction Currency
1/ when running trx 'FBICR2 - Reconcile Documents Manually' although there are only 2 items and they are reconciled and appear as without differences, group's status on navigation tree is "yellow" (Unassigned items). I expected that it will be "green" (Assigned without differences).
2/ I do not fully understand process behaviour. Although all accounts included in a group are balanced to zero; group status appears "yellow" (Unassigned items) and I have to unassign them in the assigned data view (bottom of the user interface) and then assign them manually again in order to get them in "green" status (without differences).
I understood for process '002' reconciliation is in a account balance point of view and not try to clear item by item. Am I right?
3/ If I am reconciliating company A with partner B in FBICR2, when I assign manually items and reconcile all accounts for this Company A/Partner B I expected that status for Company B and Parther A would be updated but transaction do not seems to work as I expected. Is this the correct behaviour or am I doing something wrong?
Cheers

Ralph thanks for your answer that was very helpful.
I reviewed table FBICRC002T and as you said, there were lines with RTYPE = 1 and TSL NE 0; but they were wrong, I mean not "real" since the amounts (totals amounts) were bigger than the sum of the individual line items documents involved in FBICRC002A.
Then I run 'FBICRC002_DATA_TCAL' and totals were recalculated and then I run FBICA2 and all lines in FBICRC002T with TSL NE 0 had RTYPE = 2 so gropus appear as "green" in FBICR2 now.
I think that I understand now how program derive group's status.
Then I did the following steps:
- I went to FBICR2 and unassign all items in "green" groups.
- FBICRC002A was updated with status 1 but FBICRC002T remains with status 2
- Then I logoff transaction FBICR2 and login transaction FBICR2 again. Since table FBICRC002T did not change (remains with status 2) groups appear "green" again although items were not assigned in FBICRC002A.
- Then I run 'FBICRC002_DATA_TCAL' again FBICRC002T was updated now with status 1
- After doing that, I log in transaction FBICR2 again and groups appear "yellow" as expected.
- Then I manually assign in FBICR2 all items so they changed to status "2" in FBICRC002A but FBICRC002T remains with status "1". Groups remains as "yellow" since FBICRC002T is not updated yet.
- Once again, If I run 'FBICRC002_DATA_TCAL' table FBICRC002T is updated with status "2" and groups are "green" in FBICR2.
If you are still keeping reading this thanks you. I think all of this sounds a bit tricky but my question is: how and when is table FBICRC002T updated? Is necessary to run 'FBICRC002_DATA_TCAL' after any manual change (assign or unassing) at FBICR2? Is this regular behaviour? Sound a bit strange by the way, I think I am doing something wrong or have misunderstood somethingu2026
Thanks a lot in advance for your help and patience.
Rafa

Credit Memo Request for intercompany sales process

Hi Experts
I try to find SAP notes regardsing the credit memo request for intercompany related issue but I can
not find any nates. The customer return the goods with 2 different
scenario :-
-Return with credit
-Return with replacement.
Can anybody explain how this 2 scenario perform in the SAP
intercompany sales process. Appreciate for your help. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jennie Tan

Already answered
Enter IG (internal credit memo) as the billing type for intercompany
billing for order type RE.
Cust-Sales/distrib-Transactions-Billing-Intercompany billing-Order types
Intercompany billing always refers to a delivery
Processing flow will be:
1. Create returns request invoice receipt (with or w/out reference)
2. Create returns delivery and goods receipt
3. Create credit memo invoice receipt for customer for 1.
4. Create internal credit memo for 2.
Therefore you must make the following entries in the document flow
for billing documents:
Target BillType        DlvType              ItemCat
a)    IG                  LR
b)    IG                  LR                    REN
Parameters for entries:
For a) Copying requirement: 14 Dlv.-rel.header IV
      Copy item no.: x (Check and decide yourself)
For b)Copying requirement: 15 Dlv.rel. item IV
      Data VBRK/VBRP      : 1 Inv.split (sample)
      Billing quantity    : B
      Qty/itm val.pos/neg : +
      Pricing type        : G
Also, refer following SAP Notes
13160 - Returns with intercompany billing
24756 - Credit memo requests with inter-company billing
652007 - Reporting internal credit memos on arrival side
11980 - Intercompany billing with order-related billing document
164074 - Problems for internal invoices on returns
Thanks & Regards
JP

Can BPm pick up existing process from ECC without human intervention

Hi
Is there any way BPM can read/pick the existing process from ECC system (may be solution manager workflow) and model the same.
Just trying to make sure from experts that it is not possible before replying client.
Lavanya
Edited by: Lavanya Sambaraju on Nov 19, 2010 8:23 AM

Hi Anil
Yes, we wanted to know if the process/workflow mainateined in ECC or solution manager can be dyna,mically picked up by BPM.
And your solution - "Currently BPM can talk to any other system through web services.If you can expose any functionality as web service in solution manager, you can call that from BPM"
how to implement this from solution manger?
All we know was to expose the BAPI/RFC's functionalities as web services from ECC and consume in BPM tasks or directly call these BApis in to BPM tasks.
Could you please share with us.
Thank you.

How to automate the data load process using data load file & task Scheduler

Hi,
I am doing Automated Process to load the data in Hyperion Planning application with the help of data_Load.bat file & Task Scheduler.
I have created Data_Load.bat file but rest of the process i am unable complete.
So could you help me , how to automate the data load process using Data_load.bat file & task Scheduler or what are the rest of the file is require to achieve this.
Thanks

To follow up on your question are you using the maxl scripts for the dataload?
If so I have seen and issue within the batch (ex: load_data.bat) that if you do not have the full maxl script path with a batch when running it through event task scheduler the task will work but the log and/ or error file will not be created. Meaning the batch claims it ran from the task scheduler although it didn't do what you needed it to.
If you are using maxl use this as the batch
"essmsh C:\data\DataLoad.mxl" Or you can also use the full path for the maxl either way works. The only reason I would think that the maxl may then not work is if you do not have the batch updated to call on all the maxl PATH changes or if you need to update your environment variables to correct the essmsh command to work in a command prompt.

Intercompany reconciliation in FI

Hi.
Is there anybody who got experienced to implement Intercompany reconciliation function in SEM or SEM-BCS similar in FI as follows?
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/1b/56b63e8697b300e10000000a114084/content.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/1b/56b63e8697b300e10000000a114084/content.htm]
From my understanding, Intercompany reconciliation(ICR) in FI make reconciliation job in accounting document level while basically SEM-BCS does it in Item balance level.
I just know if it is possible in BCS.

Hi Todd
It is always better to have the ICR done in ECC before the data is moved on to BCS so that u can always fix the data before it is moved on to BCS and many companies do like this only.
It may not be good a idea to reconcile after the currency translation in BCS, since it is virutally not possible to identify and fix the problem at that level.
Kindly read the following documentation on ICR:
https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000346442007E.PDF
https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000346452007E.PDF

Intercompany STO Process

Hi Experts
I am in to Intercompany STO process with one step Goods issue procedure.
When i tried to post PGI for the NLCC type D.O obtained the below error.
Error Message
Fld selectn for mvmt type 645 / acct 6005100 differs for Business Area (033)
Please advise how to fix.
Regards
RG
Edited by: R G on Jan 10, 2011 4:40 AM

Hi
Field status group is maintined as: G003 Material Consumption accounts
Post Automatically is ticked.
I understand the Business Area field is not maintained (suppress) in the account group of G003.
But, it is in movement type is maintaied as Optional.
However no requirement to use the Business Area in overall.
So, where should i turn off it in relevant to movement. Thus wouldn't cause the discrepancy against the GL.
Rgds
RG
Edited by: R G on Jan 10, 2011 6:49 AM
Edited by: R G on Jan 10, 2011 7:07 AM

Accounting entries for intercompany billing process

hi,
can any body explain what it intercompany billing process and intra company billing process and STO processess.
and their individual accounting entries of these three business with excise impact.
regards,
balajia

> Total Questions: 494 (232 unresolved)
Perhaps you should reconsider the quality of your questions? In this one you seem to have put in absolutely no effort of your own, but I will put some effort into tracking down your next question for you...
Please read the forum rules before continuing further.

Intercompany sales process

Dear ALL SD Guru,
I am doing the intercompany sales process . For the same task i have created the sales order , delivery and finally create the invoice for the customer . After that when i am trying to create the intercompany invoice , system is showing me error " Sales organization is not defined" How ever i have done all the following required setting related to create the intercompany invoice in the system.
1- Assign the supplying company code sales area to deliverying plant.
2 Create one internal customer with supplying comany code and same sales area .
3 Assign internal customer to ordering sales organization
4 Assgn default intercompany billing document type (IV) to order type (OR)
5 I have extended the articles by supplying company code sales area
6 maintain the copy control in bet Or & IV
Is there any other setting required to execute this process , Please tell me
Waiting your response
Abhi

Hi,
see below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/dd/5614e7545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/sd/configuring-intercompany-billing.htm
Kapil

Automate PO Complete from SRM to ECC

Hi All,
To Automate PO Complete from SRM to ECC i am using BADI BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI. In ECC I have to update the following indicators.
EKPO-LOEKZ = S (Deletion Indicator in Purchasing Document)
EKPO-EREKZ = X (Final Invoice Indicator)
EKPO-ELIKZ = X ("Delivery Completed" Indicator)
While coding I have to check CRM_JEST (Individual Object Status) where STAT (Object Status) = I1023 to determine a PO with u201CTransaction Completeu201D status.
Also CRM_JEST-INACT (Indicator: Status Is Inactive) and BBP_PDHGP (Business Transaction Purchasing Information) - VERSION_TYPE (Version Type (Active Document, 'Normal', Work Version)) where both are blank to determine what the active status of the PO is.
Can anyone tell me how should i approach? If there is any sample code kindly send it.
Regards,
KM

Check the Material master UoM and then check to Both system setting for the UoM in transaction CUNI, make sure you use the same ISO codes.
in SRM , check your material master UoM in Tcode COMMPR01, if need you can replicate again the material using R3AR2 and R3AR4.

Automate Your Intercompany Reconciliation Process in ECC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for