Automatic Budget version Numbers

Do oracle existing functionality allow us to give automatic budget version???
how to achieve this???
pls some1 help me....
thanks a lot n advance..........

I think you are trying to create FORM based Budget (Project Costing or Billing Responsibility) and what I am explaining you is the HTML Page Budget (Project Management Super User Responsibility).
Anyway, even FORM based Budget works almost in same way. Once you Baselined your Draft Version than automatically it will keep a copy of your last Baselined or Current Budget Version. So, again it allows you to do any changes by clicking "Details" button and again you can Baseline your Draft Version where you have done the changes. You cannot do any changes in the Baselined or Current Budget Version. You can do changes only in the Draft Budget Version.
For all the Baselined Budget Information, you can always click the "History Button" to view where you will find all your Automatically created Budget Version Number for all the Baselined or Current Budget Versions.
Regards,
Khan.

Similar Messages

  • How do I activate AUTOMATIC superscripting for numbers / dates; e.g. 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc .... It used to do this in all PRE-5.0 versions of Pages; now, it is GONE from Pages 5.0, and I cannot find out where / how to activate it !!

    How do I activate AUTOMATIC superscripting for numbers / dates; e.g. 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc .... It used to do this in all PRE-5.0 versions of Pages; now, it is GONE from Pages 5.0, and I cannot find out where / how to activate it !!

    Whilst I appreciate your responding - I do not think this helps with what I was enquiring (at least not without further explanations anyways).
    I am aware of, and do use, the function - System Preferences > Keyboard > Text - for various replacements like (tm), (c), etc .... and also for fractions like 1/2, 1/4, 1/3.
    However, my question was in relation to SUPERSCRIPTS for dates / numbers - namely, superscripting numerical suffixes for things like 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th,
    So - please help - HOW do I set this up ? If indeed it is possible without System Preferences > Keyboard > Text ???

  • Version numbering scheme?

    I know captivate doesn't automatically handle version control and I'm OK with that.
    However, we're starting to talk here about the schema for version numbering.  That is, what constitutes a 2.0 release opposed to a 1.8 release?
    In my former life working at a software production company we had very specific criteria that dictated if it was a 1.x.x release or a 1.x.x.x or what have you.
    I'm curious if others are using version numbering schema and how are you determining what constitutes a change in which spot?
    thanks

    For what it's worth, the versioning scheme was a technical decision.  After surveying large amounts of content on the web, we realized that there was a lot of Flash detection logic in the world that was going to break when we moved to 11.10.xxx.xxx. (12.0.0.x isn't completely without consequences, but it's better)
    The roadmap that we publish is the best indicator of what new functionality is in the pipeline:
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html

  • Budget version in CO is not showing up on _ALR_87013326  report. Why?

    Hi,
    This is something strange: i have 9 budget versions in my company code. I created them all and loaded budget nubmers identically!
    I can't understand the problem:
    When i execute report S_ALR_87013326 - "plan" number show up for versiona 1-8, but not for 9.
    I checked everything i could think of, still cant find what is the problem.
    Any ideas?

    This forum [FPM - General|Enterprise Performance Management (SAP EPM); deals mainly with the financial performance applications otherwise known as Enterprise Performance Managerment (EPM) carrying the BusinessObjects brand.   Your question pertains to SAP [ERP Financials Controlling|SAP ERP Financials - Controlling; which is covered by another forum.  Therefore your message has been moved.  Please adjust any bookmarks you might have and post to the appropriate area in the future.
    Thanks and best regards,
    [Jeffrey Holdeman|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/Jeffrey+Holdeman]
    SAP Labs, LLC
    BusinessObjects Division
    Americas Applications Regional Implementation Group (RIG)

  • Visual Studio 2010 Production Release Version Numbers

    I uninstalled the beta and installed the production release.  After letting it convert my projects, I noticed that the version numbers for the .NET assemblies appear to be 13.0.2000.0 and in the beta version they were 14.0.2000.0.
    Can someone from SAP confirm the version numbers for the production release?

    Hello,
    You are correct. The final build is version 13. Long story due to download sizes and integration. I've updated 4 Images now both 32 and 64 bit and had no problems. Other major change is there is no connectivity to BOE Enterprise and no plans to add it.
    See this [Link |Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010 Production Release Now Available;for more info and known issues.
    Thank you
    Don

  • How do I get row numbers to appear automatically in a Numbers chart.  Just 1,2,3,4, etc.

    How do I get row numbers to appear automatically in a Numbers chart.  Just 1,2,3,4, etc.

    Awesome! I needed a pointer for technical documentation: a thick white stroke, with a thinner black stroke going right down the middle of it. I made a new stripe stroke style: Start: 37%, Width: %26. Then I did a gap color of Paper, gap tint: 100%. Stroke color is black. Round cap.
    Thanks Bob! You rock. This made my day!!!

  • Pro Applications Update 2009-01 doesn't change version numbers?

    Hi,
    I ran the Pro Applications Update 2009-01 on my FCS installation. The update seemed to work fine, but when I open up FCP or any of the other apps, the version numbers are not changed. From the Pro Application Update page:
    "Pro Applications Update 2009-01 is a revision to Final Cut Studio (2009). This update includes Final Cut Pro 7.0.1, Motion 4.0.1, Soundtrack Pro 3.0.1, Color 1.5.1, and Compressor 3.5.1. The software addresses general compatibility issues, improves overall stability, and addresses a number of other minor issues."
    Since none of my FCS apps have upgrade version numbers, I can't tell if any of the fixes were applied. Is it possible I did something wrong when I ran the update?
    Thanks.
    Mike

    Thanks Larry and David for your responses, but unfortunately I'm not seeing what you are
    My Final Cut Studio 2009 apps are upgrades from the previous version. All the apps for FCS are in a "Final Cut Studio" folder that I created in Applications to hold the programs (I also drag this folder to the dock to have easy access to the apps).
    If I do a Command-I on the apps in this folder, they all show the old versions. Spotlight shows there are no other versions other than the ones in my "Final Cut Studio" folder.
    I wonder if the update's not working because I have the apps in a folder other than the original install location? The funny thing is that both VersionTracker and CNet's TechTracker say that there are new versions to install. But I would think that the updater would fail if I moved the apps from their original locations, not just end successfully?
    Mike

  • Need list of Crystal Reports Version Numbers by Product and Service Pack

    Hi All,
    Where can I get a list of Crystal Reports Version Numbers by Product and Service Pack? I'm trying to figure out which version we have is the most current version, because we have so many version installed threw out our company.
    Thanks.

    Hi Matt,
    Please check the crystal Report 2008 product versions
    Cr 2008+SP0 - 12.0.0.683
    Cr 2008+SP0 + FP1 - 12.0.0.796
    Cr 2008+SP0 + FP2 - 12.0.0.840
    Cr 2008+SP0 + FP3 - 12.0.3.900
    Cr 2008 + SP1 - 12.1.0.882
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.1 - 12.1.1.957
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.2 - 12.1.2.996
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.3 - 12.1.3.1028
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.4 - 12.1.4.1068
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.5 - 12.1.5.1096
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.6 - 12.1.6.1116
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.7 - 12.1.7.1144
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.8 - 12.1.8.1176
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.9 - 12.1.9.1290
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.10 - 12.1.10.1390
    Cr 2008 + SP1 + FP1.11 - 12.1.11.1454
    Cr 2008 + SP2 - 12.2.0.290
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.1 - 12.2.1.412
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.2 - 12.2.2.453
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.3 - 12.2.3.467
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.4 - 12.2.4.507
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.5 - 12.2.5.537
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.6 - 12.2.6.567
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.7 - 12.2.7.598
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.8 - 12.2.8.638
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.9 - 12.2.9.698
    Cr 2008 + SP2 + FP2.10 - 12.2.10.810
    Cr 2008 + SP3 - 12.3.0.601
    Cr 2008 + SP3 + FP3.1 - 12.3.1.684
    Cr 2008 + SP3 + FP3.2 - 12.3.2.753
    Cr 2008 + SP3 + FP3.3 - 12.3.3.812
    Thanks,
    Naga.

  • Budget version

    Hi guys,
    I have created a budget version DF1 in customising and ticked plan/actual as well as assigned it to exclusive use 0. Now i want to select it when doing the retraction of data from the BW system to BCS. How do i activate it so that i can be able to select that budget version for retraction.
    Regards,
    Tatenda

    Hi,
    To create versions:
    IMG Budget Control System (BCS) -> Budgeting  -> Definition of Budget Data  -> Edit Versions.
    To copy versions: please refer to the online help:
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/f0/ca5716260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
    BCS Budgeting  ->Budget Entry and Budgeting Tools  -> Mass Maintenance of Entry Documents -> Generating Entry Documents from Planning/Budget Data '
    I recommend you to have a look at the complete online help since you will find a lot of quite useful information
    cheers
    Mar

  • Version numbers

    Hi,
    In the xml descriptions there is a version attribute
    with eg value 9.0.3.10.62
    What is the difference between that and 9.0.3.10.93 (except that 62 is before 93 - I can see that ;) )
    And why would I encounter problems with code that was created (including the xml files) on 62 but then compiled on 93. Eg on execution on 92 version of JDev of 62 version created code , at certain times a master detail scenario comes up with the error that an owning entity is not found
    What would be the difference of the JDEV behind each ( I believe that both were 9.0.3.2 - am I wrong?)
    Thanks
    P.

    Olivier,
    just saw that somebody did answer back.
    i meant the xml descriptORS not descriptions - and apparently due to a mess up a 9.0.3 zip was unzipped in a directory called jdev9032 and nobody checked the version numbers.
    Wrong conclusion.
    The issue was that when something was working when developed on 9.0.3, it failed to work when recompiled on 9.0.3.2 without any obvious explanations.
    when the objects where forced to update their xml descriptors everything worked fine.
    I still do not understand why things would go that bad and why nothing warns you about the wrong versions but i guess one should be more careful anyway
    P.

  • Different definition of file version numbers in Jdev and Subversion

    In the SVN Red book(http://svnbook.red-bean.com/), they say that updating a single file creates the new revision of the whole repository.
    So even if a file has not changed, it still can go to a higher version.
    +"Revision Numbers Are Different Now+
    +In CVS, revision numbers are per file. This is because CVS stores its data in RCS files; each file has a corresponding RCS file in the repository, and the repository is roughly laid+
    +out according to the structure of your project tree.+
    +In Subversion, the repository looks like a single filesystem. Each commit results in an entirely new filesystem tree; in essence, the repository is an array of trees. Each of these trees is labeled with a single revision number. When someone talks about “revision 54”, he's talking about a particular tree (and indirectly, the way the filesystem looked after the 54th commit).+
    +Technically, it's not valid to talk about “revision 5 of foo.c.” Instead, one would say “foo.c as it appears in revision 5.” Also, be careful when making assumptions about the evolution of a file. In CVS, revisions 5 and 6 of foo.c are always different. In Subversion, it's most likely that foo.c did not change between revisions 5 and 6."+
    The above makes sense to me. But when I use JDeveloper with SVN, I see its showing me different version numbers with different files.
    Can somebody explain. JDev essentially is showing the version of the file when it was last checked in, but because of changes in some other files, the "actual" version (as per the definition in redbook) might have changed...jdev DOES NOT show this change...why the apparent difference is what I want to understand.
    Thanks,
    Amit

    Thanks for your replies.
    @Timo - I checked out the project from SVN repository to a new folder. It still shows the old versions for some files. In other words, all files are not on same version as shown in app navigator.
    @John - I have tried to reproduce the sections from the Redbook that I felt relevant and that led me to thinking what I am thinking (expecting) now.
    --Amit                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Version Numbers Vs. Patch Levels For Web Tools

    I have noticed that version numbers for Web Tools such as 620, 621, 622, 624, 625, 627, and 628 correspond somehow to the patch level (6, 8, 10, etc.). What is the difference between the version numbers and patch levels, and which ones match up with which?

    Hi Michael,
    Prior to p10, the last digit of the version corresponds to the patch level.
    From p10 going forward, the last set of digits represents the patch.
    Patch 10 is 2007.0.630.10
    Patch 11 will be 2007.0.631.11
    The version will only change if there are upgrade scripts that need to run for the patch.

  • Crover - generate OS version numbers for Arch Linux

    Arch is a rolling distro, but did you ever wish it still had release numbers? So you could check what "version" you currently have installed, and upgrade to the latest "version" if necessary, with a reasonable delay between versions?
    Of course you didn't. No sensible person would want to attach pseudo-version numbers to a rolling distro.
    https://code.google.com/p/crover/
    https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/crover/
    crover returns a version number for Arch Linux based on time elapsed since the distro's initial release (March 11, 2002). The number format is X.Y, with X being years and Y being subdivisions of the current year. By default, the version number is generated for the current date with a subdivision size of one week.
    As of this writing, the current version is Arch Linux 12.1. In other words, Arch is 12 years and 1 week old.

    Hmm, you could actually make this somewhat more relevant to actual update practices if you wanted. Were I to try to accomplish such a task, I would figure out a way to check and see if all the official repos are up-to-date (or just if all the packages the user has installed are up-to-date with `checkupdates`). Then, take the number of seconds elapsed since Arch's release till the last update (which brought that rig up-to-date).
    Then, you could grab the user's list of currently installed packages with pacman and take a hash of it. And, by concatenating those two figures together, you could get some semblance of a "version" number. For example, mine would be something similar to the following:
    378691200.4c41d609
    Not to mention, with this calculation, it would not be difficult to format the time part of the version in a variety of ways. May be worth thinking about
    All the best,
    -HG

  • CC apps version numbers? Can't find current version number of apps in Download Center

    Is there a way to see the current version numbers of the different apps on the Adobe website, or in CC Download Center? All I see is that they are version CC.
    Well, that doesn't tell me much...is it After Effects 12.0, 12.1? Photoshop 14.0, 14.1, 14.1.2? I can't tell which is the most current from your website. The CC app isn't any better as I can't trust what it says. I have apps installed, but it doesn't recognize them – It's shows that I need to install them. Is that because I need to update it? It doesn't show as an update, only that I need to install it.
    If I could tell from your website (Download Center) what the current release version of the software is, I could at least compare it to the version I have installed on my machine.

    Hello there, carlafromswisher.
    One thing that could be playing a roll in your issue might be the Country your App Store is set to. In this case, the apps may be available in the French store, and not the US store. The following Knowledge Base article offers up how to change the country of your Store:
    Change the country of your iTunes Store, App Store, iBooks Store, and Mac App Store account
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6119
    Change your country on iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch
    Tap iTunes Store, App Store, or iBooks Store.
    At the bottom of the Featured page, tap Sign In.
    If you're already signed in, skip to step 5.
    Tap Use Existing Apple ID.
    Enter your Apple ID and password and tap OK.
    Tap your Apple ID.
    Tap View Apple ID or View Account.
    Tap Country/Region.
    Tap Change Country or Region.
    Tap the Store menu and tap your country.
    Tap Next.
    Review the Terms and Conditions and Apple Privacy Policy.
    Tap Agree if you agree to the terms and conditions.
    In the prompt that appears, tap Agree.
    Select a payment method and enter your payment information.
    Enter your billing address and tap Next.
    Thanks for reaching out to Apple Support Communities.
    Cheers,
    Pedro.

  • Curiosity - Network Volume Version Numbers

    When my computers loose connectivity to network drives, the next time they connect a version number is appended to the volume name (only seen in some locations - such as alias "Original:" path (Get Info) and in some applications). While not USUALLY a problem, I have had issues with Backup not finding my Time Capsule Disk apparently because of a "change" in volume name (yes, I am using Time Machine but I also have a need for Backup). I have two Time Capsules, one with the volume "<volumename>-43" and the other "<volumename>-20", that I'm assuming have lost connectivity 43 and 20 times respectively.
    Is it possible to "reset" these version numbers - or better yet, keep them from happening in the first place?

    I'm having the exact same issue, which breaks all my references to the volume. I have to update the path to include the new number <volumename>-5 currently. The problem happens when I do a restart, or loose network connection for other reasons. I happens on my desktop (Mac Pro) and my laptop (MacBook Pro) when mounting to my Tiger Server (PowerMac G5). It is extremely frustrating and makes code development a pain in the butt when I use my server for file storage.

Maybe you are looking for