Automatic Post processing of Qualifications

Gurus,
I have to implement the IDP ( individual development plan ) and we plan to have one appraisal document for both objective setting and development plan. What we need to do is include the development plan and once the employee fullfill /aquire the development item, this has to go back and update the qualification catalogue of the employee.
Any thoughts ?
J

Hi,
Yes it is possible, in the appraisal template under the processing tab, you will find a section for follow-up processing. Here you have standard badi's to update qualifications. If the standard ones don't suit your requirement then you can create a bespoke enhancement for badi HRHAP00_FOLLOW_UP or HRHAP00_FOLLOW_UP_D depending on whether you want it to be processed in the background or not.
Regards,
Priya.

Similar Messages

Are 'read only' items causing my automatic row processing to fail?

I have a form that uses automatic row processing to update my table.
I recently had to add a check to lock down the fields using the read only condition where a record has been 'approved'. So, I turned off all of the fields and hid the update button.
Now they want me to check to see if the user is a manager, and if so, allow them to see the update button, and make a single field on the form modifiable.
I have the user identified as a manager, and can make the field accept the change (a yes/no combo box). Yet when they click the update button, the form just sits there. A branch is supposed to fire on hitting that button, taking them back to the previous report, but it doesn't happen. The source of the combo box in question uses a column on the table, and works fine when the form has all of the fields showing for modification.
I had some validations that I finally set to never fire, thinking that they were failing and just not giving the error messages. I know a bad sql or pl/sql atatement in a validation will cause the form to just keep sitting there doing nothing, and thought it might help.
Several of the various fields are combo boxes, several are text boxes.
I'm stumped.
Shall I keep the regular update button hidden whether it is a manager or not (because it has been 'approved'), and enable a new button that fires off a process to update the one field that the manager may want to change? Does making a field 'read only' always have a detrimental effect on the auto processes I've been counting on? Is that if fact what is happening now?
Thanks in advance for any advice or comments on this.
Clayton

Hi, Scott.
My version is 3.0.0.00.20
I have received info to set up the application, though I have not activated it as yet. I'm reluctant to try to load up the various tables to make it work. It could be done.
My workaround is to that the user (a manager) fires off to another form to show an individual record, and ask if he/she really wants to make this change. On submit, they will be taken back to the original locked down form, and I will update the single field in that process of returning them. This will actually be a plus, in that I expect to show them all of the 'duplicate' entries for that item, and show them that by 'activating' this particular item, they will 'deactivate' the one duplicate that is currently active. Or, if they are deactivating the sole item that is active, that there will in fact be no active items in the system. Convoluted as heck, but they swear this is how they've been doing business with their briefcases and file cabinets of Excel files. I'm surprise they even float at this point (these are ships we're talking about).
This all may be due to the form originally having a next/previous/count process once arrived at my clicking on the edit button of the report of items. All of that has been hidden away, and though the fields exist of the form, they are not used. They only see the current item that they clicked on from the report.
I read up a little on session state, as well as posts with the debug error I was getting. I'm still not on board with the whole issue of 'state'. Items stay as they are until they're changed, no? I suppose that sounds simplistic.
One of the things that caught my eye was several combo box lists that on read only mode, showed [] square brackets. Which, in some cases is okay.
What I'll try to do is set up a public application - for future use if nothing else. I'm going to be working on this for awhile. I have more than a bit of work to do to cleanse the data as well as get rid of the single sign on requirement (I'll assume that I should have to do this) in order to share the app.
I know you're expecting me to have this up and running for you to look at, but I'm under the gun. And they actually like my workaround.
I'll keep everybody informed, one way or another.
Clayton

De-linking (Valuation class & GL A/c) automatic posting in Invoice booking

Experts,
I have a issue regarding link between FI & MM
From what I understand,
there is a link between Service & Valuation class
& also a link between valuation class & GL.
This link enables automatic FI line item posting while invoice booking.
My question:
1. Can we break the linkage between valuation class & GL i.e. we want to stop the automatic posting
2. What is the effect of above
3. Would you advise to do this .. ? Why?
Regards,
KPS007

Hi,
SAP standard process are the best business practises and it should changed only when we have genuine business problem and not for people issue.
There are several scenarios will occur during MIGO and MIRO. For each scenario system should determine a correct Inventory account, GR/IR clearing account, Price difference account and etc. First you need to prepare an excel sheet with all your possible business scenario, valuation area/valuation grouping code and their respective GL accounts. Once you have listed out all the scenarios and correct GL accounts, you can configure the system as per your requirement. Initial home work is needed to avoid any difference in account posting. Hence try to fix the source of your problem rather than changing the best practise. Account determination is vast and it cannot be explained here but please refer the below link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/1a39516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
Regards,
Senthil

Post Processing a bank line item - opening balance

Hi Experts,
I need some help with post processing of a bank statement item.
It is a greenfield implementation where no legacy transactional data or opening balances are migrated. Therefore I've posted a bank statement with incoming domestic bank transfer. This line item now requires post processing as it does not relate to any preceding transaction / document.
The journal entry looks like this...
161012 - AUD Bank No.1 Domestic bank transfers = Credit 5,000,000
161010 - AUD Bank Account No 1 = Debit 5,000,000
I guess "post processing" is required to clear the account 161012 and credit account 161010.
What is the best way to do that?
Thanks
Puru

Hi Puru,
Go to Liquidity Management > view bank statements > Filter with your new bank
You will observe that a bank statement with ID # 0 got created and the closing balance is same amount what you have migrated.
Now you select new bank statement the ID will be 1 and the last bank statement 0 closing balance will become the opening bank balance in bank statement # 1.
Migration of balances for bank accounts enables you to migrate the current balances of your bank accounts. During migration system automatically creates an offsetting entry so that the document balance results in zero ( this entry is only for migration posting only )
Your expectation of again posting manual journal is not incorrect and is not required here.
Your migration of bank opening balance amount is successful and you can use this bank account for your postings going forward.
Kindly mark this thread as answered if i answered your queries.
Thanks
Lokesh Sharma

Without Automatic Row Processing (DML)

Hi All
I try to make one page to show use DML statements without standard Automatic Row Process.
What I have:
One page with:
region: Report - select empno, ename, sal, deptno from emp;
region: Form with items: p6_empn, p6_ename, p6_sal, p6_deptno
addictionaly in that moment I have:
process CreateProcess:
begin
insert into emp (empno, ename, sal, deptno)
values (emp_seq.nextval, :P6_ENAME, :P6_SAL, :P6_DEPTNO);
commit;
end;
and button CREATE.
Create Process is fired when I push CREATE button and Insert statement works corecctly. Branch is on the same page. (I use request).
Now I would like to show update and delete statements.
In Report I have in column EMPNO standard button Edit (each row)
(<img src="#IMAGE_PREFIX#edit.gif" alt="Edit">)
I have process SelectProcess:
begin
select ename,sal,deptno
into :p6_ename, :p6_sal, :p6_deptno
from emp
where empno = :p6_empno;
end;
It is fired In Load _ Before Header
When I push Edit in one row I would like to see details of employee in Form, but I see nothing. In session state all is correct - I see :p6.... with name, sal and ...
I dont know how to connect this process with buton and branch.
could you help me?

Hi,
I have done a quick test for this - [http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=25946:1]
On the Edit page, I have a process called P2_LOAD_DATA that runs "On Load - Before Header", is conditional on P2_EMPNO being NOT NULL and using the following code:
BEGIN
SELECT EMPNO, ENAME, JOB
INTO :P2_EMPNO, :P2_ENAME, :P2_JOB
FROM EMP
WHERE EMPNO = :P2_EMPNO;
END;I have a button with a Button Name setting of "UPDATE" (user sees this as Apply Changes)
I then have a process that runs "On Submit - After Computations and Validations" and is conditional on REQUEST = UPDATE. The code is:
BEGIN
UPDATE EMP
SET ENAME = :P2_ENAME,
JOB = :P2_JOB
WHERE EMPNO = :P2_EMPNO;
END;The source settings on P2_EMPNO, P2_ENAME and P2_JOB are as I described in my previous post.
One thing to check - do you have a "reset page" process? If so, remove it.
Andy

Third party sale scenario: COGS not allowed as automatically posted.

Dear Gurus,
I have come across this error during execution of third party sale scenario.
When the user enters a PO with reference to PR which is in reference to SO, one error pops up which says COGS cannot be automatically posted only.
When I deselect the "Post automatically" tick, the PO can be saved.
Process we are following during third party sale process:-
1. Sales order.
2. PR with reference to Sales order.
3. Purchase order with reference to PR.
4. Statistical GR with reference to PO.: COGS Dr. To GR/IR Clearing account Cr.
5. Sales Invoice: Customer Dr. To Sales Cr.
6. MIRO: GR/IR Clearing account Dr. To Vendor Cr.
I have my own doubts on the statistical GR part. Can you pls. validate the same.
Also in case of third party sale, what will be the CO object as COGS is not created a cost element. (SAP standard)
Regards,
Harnish Shah

Hi
Please check the steps for 3rd business process.
Sales Order:VA01
List of Sales Order:VA05
Purchase Order with reference to Purchase Requisition: ME21N
Inbound Delivery:VL31N Material Receipt:MIGO
Result Recording Work list:QE51N
QM Usage Decision:QA32
Activities due for Shipping `Sales Orders, fast display` VL10A　(VL01N)
Post of Goods Issue (PGI):VL02N
Post of Goods Deliver:VLPOD
Post the Billing doc VF01 or Maintain the Billing due list-VF04
Release Billing Document for Accounting VFX3
Delivery Document list ZVL05
Edit Work list for Invoice List VF24
Output of Billing Document VF31
Customer Payment F-28
As per my knowledge once psot the PGI,System will upddate COGS values.
Regards
asuvamsi

Where do I define the automatic posting of goods issue to Cost Center?

Dear Experts,
I found out that all the raw material consumed each time I do the confirmation of process order via CORK did not post to Cost Center.
Where do I define the automatic posting to Cost Center for Goods issue for consumption?
regards,
Abraham

Hi,
I found out the default movement type has been predefined to 261 (GI for Order, in which it doesn't post to Cost Center). I guess the standard system has a valid reason to set it as 261 instead of 201 (GI for cost center).
As far as I understand, the Process order will accumulate all the costs (direct cost - material, labour and machine hour and also indirect cost) during the confirmation (material is backflushed and fnished goods is auto-GR). And at the end of the period, this process order will be settled its variance if there is (between the total cost credited - based on standard cost of the finished goods and actual total accumulated costs debited).
So, my question is, by right should there be any CO posting being made to Cost Center for material consumption in the above process flow as I checked in the standard system, the material movement for raw material and finished goods have no Cost Center posting at all?
regards,
Abraham

Payment terms in automatic payment process

Dear Experts,
Can anyone tell me,how to make it sure,payment terms assigned in documents are not considered in automatic payment process.Per example,If one pyment term is of 15 days due net,it will not allow us to make the payment before the due date.
I can assign payment terma immediately due net in the vendor master.This is the secondary thing.If already we have end number of documents posted with the payment term with 15 days due net,then how to go about it.Now there is an option of changing it manually one by one,which is tedious.
Please advice
Regards
Partha

Hi,
From FBL1N, you can chnage the baseline date through MASS change option.
From FBL1N, select the documents for which you want to chnage the terms. Click on the Mass Change icon. From the pop up screen, input a baseline date as required and execute. All the documents will be updated with the given baseline date.
For example, if you give a baselline date of 30 days back, the invoices (with 15 days payment terms) will fall due immediately as of today.
Regards,
Mike

Automated post processing of PDFs

The PDFs generated by RoboHelp are not production-ready in my
opinion, because:
- All bookmarks are expanded by default.
Acrobat Pro does not include a feature to collapse all
bookmarks at once (you can only collapse top-level bookmarks). You
have to collapse bookmarks either manually, or use the free Acrobat
plug-in "closebm" from Planet PDF. This plugin works with Acrobat 8
BTW.
- The initial page mode of the PDF generated with RH is set
to "Page Only". This means that the bookmarks panel is not
displayed when opening the PDF. My preferred setting is to show the
available bookmarks when a PDF is opened (Acrobat setting
"Bookmarks Panel and Page").
Because we run everything in batch (compile help, publish
help) and because we do not wish to buy a full Acrobat license for
every author/publisher (the add-on that comes with RH should be
enough), I have created a solution that automatically collapses
bookmarks, sets the initial view to show bookmarks, and finally
linearizes (Fast Web View) the PDF.
You don't need Acrobat to do this and all auxiliary (and
free) programs to post process are in the sample project that you
can download from
here:
After unzipping the sample project, double-click the file
"PostProcessPDF.bat". This batch file will update the
"Printed_Documentation.pdf" in the folder "PDF Input" and put 2 new
versions in the folder "PDF Output":
1. BookmarksCollapsed.pdf
2. BookmarksCollapsed_Linearized.pdf
The following steps are performed in the batch file:
- The bookmarks from the original RH PDF
("Printed_Documentation.pdf") are exported to XML using "iText
Toolbox";
- The resulting XML file is manipulated with "replace.exe"
(just a free command line search/replace tool that I found), so
that bookmarks are set to collapse;
- The manipulated XML file + original
"Printed_Documentation.pdf" are then combined in "iText Toolbox" to
create the new "1. BookmarksCollapsed.pdf" in folder "PDF Output";
- The "1. BookmarksCollapsed.pdf" in folder "PDF Output" is
processed with Ghostscript's "pdfopt" to linearize the PDF again.
When you change a PDF and just "Save" a PDF (also in Acrobat), Fast
Web View is gone. In Acrobat you have to 'Save As' or use the "PDF
Optimizer" to linearize the PDF again.
The sample project is pretty large (11 MB), but this is
because Ghostscript and iText Toolbox are included.
BTW, you must have Java installed to use "iText Toolbox".
Have fun,
Herman

I thought that because Ghostscript is command-line based, I
could just add the files to my sample project.
But apparently there are some dependencies, and you have to
install Ghostscript to use my sample files.
If you want to play around with my sample files, install
Ghostscript to the folder 'RH' (remove folder 'gs' first). It will
then install to folder RH\gs, where the batch file is expecting the
Ghostscript files.
Latest version of Ghostscript can be found here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/downloading.php?group_id=1897&use_mirror=heanet&filename=gs 862w32.exe&73395111

Lumia 1020 - Disable Post Processing?

Preface: I've only had the Lumia 1020 for 48 hours.
Problem: I've noticed that when taking pictures with the Nokia Pro Camera application, the preview after capturing the image is awesome. If I then go to look at the captured image, there is a short pause, and suddenly the picture goes soft, detail is lost, colors become horribly skewed. It would seem that there is some massive post processing being done after the image is archived.
Request: Is there any way to disable this post processing? It's taking wonderful pictures and destroying them.
I'll see if I can take a screen capture to show what I'm talking about and I'll post again after work.
Lumia 1020 Quirks.
- Post processing done even on "raw" 34MP images.
- The entire screen is powered when using Peek. Despite being OLED and Nokia specifically stating otherwise.
- Can turn on (but not off) camera in the background on a call. App doesn't open but shutter does and spins up CPU.

So after looking at the 5MP version (attached) it seems that it is indeed post processing it after the fact and saving it that way. Which begs the question.... Why? Isn't the photo review going through the Nokia Pro Camera app anyway? Why is it doing post processing (I've also had it remove red-eye automatically when reviewing photos)?
Stil, I want to know; how can I disable it?
*Edit: Trying to attach the large format photo as well...
*Edit2: After uploading both and flipping back and forth between the "review" image, the 5MP saved image, and the highres saved image, they are all the same, meaning that it is doing the post processing as it is saving the 5MP & 34MP image. This means there is no way to truly undo it. (It also means things like auto-redeye reduction are permanent, and can't be undone, tweaked, etc.)
So.... thoughts?
Lumia 1020 Quirks.
- Post processing done even on "raw" 34MP images.
- The entire screen is powered when using Peek. Despite being OLED and Nokia specifically stating otherwise.
- Can turn on (but not off) camera in the background on a call. App doesn't open but shutter does and spins up CPU.
Attachments:
WP_20130812_12_46_36_Pro.jpg ‏2045 KB
WP_20130812_12_46_36_Pro__highres.jpg ‏10902 KB

Automatic row processing updating my primary key

Hi all!
In Apex 3.2, I've got an Interactive report with a DML form on a table. My table has a primary key which use a sequence (trigger based). When I created my forms, I specified that I wanted to use an existing trigger as the source type of the primary key.
When I try to create a record, it work. If I try to create a new record and save, my trigger give me an error message because the automatic row processing is trying to update the primary key too. (My trigger on the update specify that the primary key should not be updated).
So my question is : How can I make the automatic row processing update everything but the primary key ? (I noticed that I could have asked APEX to use my SEQUENCE directly instead of the trigger (in the creation Wizard). But I dont know how to change this now that my form is created.)
Is there a source type that I can change in my primary key item ?
Note : My primary key item (id_emp) is protected and hidden. If I display it as "Display only", the update works... But I dont need to see id_emp on my form.

OK,
From your first post, it sounds as though the process is trying to perform an INSERT rather than an UPDATE. It is, therefore, trying to create a new record using a primary key that already exists on the table.
If that is the case, then we need to go through the points along that route:
1 - when you load a record into the page, the primary key page item should be given a value. So, firstly, check the link is populating the correct page item. And then, when the page has loaded, click the Session button on the Developer's toolbar at the bottom of the screen and check that the value is there
2 - when the page loads, one, and only one, page item should have the primary key value. This should be P3_NO_EMPLOYE*. Check other page items to make sure that their source is not NO_EMPLOYE. Again, check with using the Session button to see if the value appears anywhere else on the page
3 - when the page loads, the "SAVE" button should become visible. Check that this is conditional on P3_NO_EMPLOYE being NOT NULL
4 - there should be one, and only one, button that triggers the SAVE action. Check that there are no other buttons that either (A) are called SAVE or (B) trigger the INSERT SQL database action
5 - when the SAVE button is clicked, the "Process Row of..." process should be triggered and, because the button is SAVE and, therefore, sends "SAVE" as the REQUEST value, the process identifies this request as an Update database action. Check that you have Update ticked on the process and that you only have one process that can perform the update
6 - it is possible to change the value of the Request after a button has been clicked, so check that you have no computations or processes that run before the "Process Row of..." process
Andy

Automatic Posting accounts not allowed when G/L Account is entered in LIPS

Dear all,
In order to override the standard G/L account determination when PGI a delivery, we developed a routine to write the G/L account devired by the system and populate LIPS-KONTO with the account we want to post.
This is working perfectly as soon as that G/L account does not have the flag "automatic postings only" is not flagged.
However, is this flag is active, we are not able to PGI.
Do you know if this is the normal SAP behaviour? Any suggestions if we must use that account?
thanks!
Fátima Pereira

Hello,
The situation is the following....
Two items in the sales order with two different item categories and same movement type.
This movement type is customized in OMWN with Account Modifier ZVA that is linked to account A.
In case of the first item category this will be ok.
On the second item category the customer wants to keep the same movement type but post into a different account.
During delivery processing we created in a userexit to override the derived Account Modifier to another one that we need and retrieve that account and populate LIPS-KONTO.
Conclusion:
1) If we use the standard account determination, LIPS-KONTO is not filled in and the system considers an automatic posting.
2) If the LIPS-KONTO is filled in with a GL Account that has the "automatic postings only" set, the system apparently is considering this a manual posting.
My question is: Is this the Standard SAP behaviour?
Regards,
Fátima

Bug: Timestamp columns don't work in automatic row processing

It appears that automatic row processing doesn't work with timestamp columns. Here is the scenario:
- I have a view that contains a timestamp column
- I create an automatic row processing process that reads a row from this view
- I create a hidden item with a source type of "Database Column" and set its source value to the name of the timestamp column.
- The value of the hidden input is empty, i.e. value=""
I found that, as a workaround, if a change the view to convert the timestamp to a string (e.g. SELECT TO_CHAR(LAST_MODIFIED) LAST_MODIFIED rather than SELECT LAST_MODIFIED), it works correctly.
Adding a format mask or doing the conversion in a "post calculation computation" (e.g. TO_CHAR(:P34_LAST_MODIFIED)) doesn't work.

Later on in my exploration I found that some of the text boxes on the Keynote inspector were not accepting text, and so I couldn't even change the transition time for a slide. That prompted a restart of the program and that also seems to have solved the problem where the inspector wasn't accepting input for the columns and gutter. It's working now. So watch out for that. No idea what was at the root of it, which is annoying.

Account Receivables AR_AUTOMNT - Automatic Maintenance Processing.

I need help to set up AR_AUTOMNT process. I followed peoplebooks 'Setting Up Automatic Maintenance Processing' After i run the process in the message log i see this.
10 2:59:45PM PS:AR - Automatic Maintenance
10 2:59:46PM 1 Requests will be processed
10 2:59:47PM Building Work Tables
10 3:00:02PM 96 debit items selected for processing
10 3:00:03PM 96 credit items selected for processing
10 3:00:03PM Database Update in progress
10 3:00:18PM 0 Maintenance Worksheets created
10 3:00:18PM 0 line items created on Maintenance Worksheets
10 3:00:19PM 92 Pending Groups created
10 3:00:19PM 0 line items created in Pending Groups
10 3:00:19PM 92 line items created in Pending Groups
10 3:00:20PM Automatic Maintenance process has completed successfully
3:00:27PM Published message with ID edac0e95-80b7-11e0-a6a0-ed6ef00794bc to create entry in folder GENERAL.
3:00:27PM Successfully posted generated files to the report repository
The reports were blank for 'AR11004', 'AR11005'.
I did not understand where i am doing worng.
In the SET UP Automatic maintenance Methods-
I am trying to balanace the Items, Item Balance which is less than eqaul to $9.99

Hi Suresh,
Thank you for your kind response.
I've checked OB31 and found no entries. I've used tcode: SU21 and SU22 to chec the affected tcode: FD01 .
I've also checked and analyzed authorization object F_KNA1_AEN and have configured a dummry role for testing in QAS.
Authorization package in the dummy role:
-> Maintained Customer: Change Authorization for Certain Fields            F_KNA1_AEN
-> Maintained Customer: Change Authorization for Certain Fields            T-QS25298300
->   Field group                VGRUP
For Field group (VGRUP), I'm able to define the "Object Type": D for Customers, but I do not know what is the value for "Field Group"
Please kindly advice how can this be done.
Thank you.
Cheers.

Automatic clearing process for consignment liability account?

Hi all,
we have to manually do a FI posting to clear the consignment liability account, but there are 2000 line items, so I'm wondering if there is any automatic clearing process like GR/IR clearing ( MR11) for consignment liability account? Or can we run a program to clear this account?
please advise.

uncheck docs which can be cleared and try , make sure test run is on.
try with other gr/ir as well just too see if this tcode serves the purpose.

Automatic Post processing of Qualifications

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for