Automatically confirm CR after Urgent Correction closed

How do we setup ChaRM so that when an URGENT CORRECTION is closed, the CR is automatically confirmed.
ie. Urgent correction > Imported to Production > Confirmed > Closed
(at this point the CR would automatically change from Approved to Confirmed)
Thanks!!

Hi shivjansi
I have checked the config in the IMG (as per your suggestion) and can confirm I have already set this up.
ZDHF E0008 SET_PREDOC
and
ZDHF E0010 SET_PREDOC
This should change the ZDCR status when the ZDHF is closed (E0008) or withdrawn (E0010).  But it's not happening
With the ZDMJ I have added similiar config:
ZDMJ E0013 SET_PREDOC
and
ZDMJ E0014 SET_PREDOC
This is working fine for ZDMJ.  When a ZDMJ is withdrawn (E0014), the ZDCR goes from Approved to Pending Approval.  When a ZDMJ is closed (E0013), the ZDCR goes from Approved to Confirmed.
Just need to get ZDHF doing the same thing! 
Shivjansi - is there something else I can look at for ZDHF to get this working?  Thanks!!!

Similar Messages

  • Automatic import urgent corrections

    Hello ,
    we have a userown urgent correction (zdhf). everything is ok, but we want import the urgent correction autmaticly in the productivesystem in the evening, if the urgent correction hav the status "authorized for import".
    is it possible?
    regards
    nico
    Edited by: Nico Effenberger on Oct 21, 2008 10:16 AM
    Edited by: Nico Effenberger on Oct 21, 2008 10:27 AM

    The question is answered.
    We use now the report sap_socm_service_report with a variant. it works good.
    thx nico
    Edited by: Nico Effenberger on Oct 21, 2008 10:29 AM

  • After working correctly before Firefox now says that I don't have the propper permission to have the automatic upgrade process. New iMac and MacBook Pro both afected. Using Snow Leopard

    After working correctly since I started using the iMac Firefox now say that I do not have the privileges to have it auto update the Firefox. I don't think I changed anything.
    == This happened ==
    A few times a week
    == Since last update

    Well, running on a 2006 model.  I did not have a startup disc.  Initially, it booted up on original software in 2006.  Since then, I've upgraded to 10.6 via a box set.  And, since then I think I popped it up to lion. 
    All I have on a disc is snow leopard.  And, I can't get farther than the setup screen due to hard drive.  I'm taking to a apple authorized repair store right now.  We'll see what they tell me .  I'm just going to weigh the cost of repair vs. buying new.
    Another bad, stupid thing is I had no means of backing up my stuff.  So, I might have lost things like music, vids, etc.  we'll see if they can recover.  If the cost is too much for repair I might just forget it and start over with a new system.  Just not sure at this point.

  • ChaRM: Completion of urgent correction

    Hi!
    What is the usual action after the completion of urgent correction via Task Plan?
    Is it possible to inform (automatically) the end user/support team about it?
    If Yes, how?
    Thank you very much!
    regards
    Thom

    Hello,
    the usual action after the completion of urgent correction via Task Plan called "Complete Correction".
    After this action the are no more action possible in SDHF because the SDHF has an intern status "finished".
    The last action in this process is in SDCR. Here you have execute the action "Confirms Realization".
    After this action the are no more action possible in SDCR because the SDCR has an intern status "finished".
    You can send an email notification after each action. This is not SAP standard. You must create your own CRM action.
    The note 691303 (Sending E-Mail from message after status change) will guide you.
    Best regards
    Thomas

  • Urgent Correction COmpletion

    Hi all,
    We are using SOLMAN 4.0 and SCM is configured for multi clients.Now when i do a urgent coorection,while completing the urgent correction it gives a warning "Not all mandatory phaseswere completed Do you still want tocomplete the task list?".
    We are haveing 3 developement clients and iam moveing the request from 110 client.
    Moreover when i click complete correction,it tries to log on to 120 client(i.e., i am taken to the logon screen)when i enter the password,it then gives the above warning.
    Can anyone tell what are all the mandatory pahses for a urgent correction?
    Why it logs to 120 client when i click complete correction?
    FYI:It was working fine when there is only single clients in dev and quality.
    Thanks in advance,
    Avinash

    Hello,
    the usual action after the completion of urgent correction via Task Plan called "Complete Correction".
    After this action the are no more action possible in SDHF because the SDHF has an intern status "finished".
    The last action in this process is in SDCR. Here you have execute the action "Confirms Realization".
    After this action the are no more action possible in SDCR because the SDCR has an intern status "finished".
    You can send an email notification after each action. This is not SAP standard. You must create your own CRM action.
    The note 691303 (Sending E-Mail from message after status change) will guide you.
    Best regards
    Thomas

  • How to avoid automatic confirmation of BP in Interaction Center

    Hi Experts,
    in SAP CRM when finding the correct BP the system automatically is confirming him. But I don't want the automatic confirmation. Where can I find the customizing so the user always has to use the button 'Confirm'.
    Best Regards
    Oliver

    Hi Oliver,
    You can change the configuration at your identification profile, at t-code CRMC_IC_BPPROFX
    There, change the 'auto continue' options for your profile.
    Kind regards,
    Garcia

  • Automatic confirmation indicator set in TO

    Dear forum
    I am creating a transfer order with reference to a delivery, using transaction LT03.
    But when I look at the transfer order in display mode after it is created, the Confirmation indicator (LTAK-KQUIT) is set automatically in the TO.
    How is the configuration made to avoid having the confirmation indicator set in the transfer order?
    I had a look at the IMG settings in LE->WM->Activities->Confirmation and removed the "Confirm immediately" indicator set for the movement type 601 GI for delivery...but it did not do it for me, the Confirmation indicator is still set in the transfer order.
    Anyone knows?
    thanks

    IMG settings in LE->WM->Activities->Confirmation
    From SAP Help:
    "Immediate confirmation of a transfer order item only works out
    *if the respective movement type does not disallow this
    *if the storage type from which the materials are picked is not subject to pick confirmation
    *if the storage type into which the materials are put away does not have a putaway confirmation requirement."
    If you remove any of this conditions, then the stock transfer order will not be set to confirmed automatically. In my case, I just had to set the "confirm stock removal" indicator for the storage type in question, in order to remove the automatic confirmation indicator in the stock transfer order.

  • Automatic Confirmation of Vendor Changes

    Hi friends,
    We are developing a Z report to automatically confirm some modifications in vendors. On the first part of this Z report we describe an internal table and fill it with the vendor codes (field LIFNR) that need to be confirmed.
    On the second part of the report we are suposed to update field LFA1-CONFS for these vendors, but direct updates of databse are banned (of course). I've found a function Module called "VENDOR_UPDATE" that could help, but it needs tons of mandatory tables, so I wonder if there is any other Function Module to update this field: LFA1-CONFS, or if someone can propose any other approach to this problem.
    Many Thanks for your help.
    Ignacio.

    Hi Robert,
    It looks you're right about VENDOR_UPDATE, it would be like a direct update so it's discarded.
    About RFBIKR00 it looks that field CONFS is not allowed here so I doubt it is a way.
    I am now thinking on the following commands:
    set parameter id : 'lifnr' field aux_lfa1-lifnr.
    call transaction 'FK08' and skip first screen.
    As transaction FK08 is the correct one to confirm the changes and keeps a trace it looks the better approach. The problem is that I can't get this commands working fine, maybe I should add more parameters.
    How can I know the parameters I can use with this command?
    Thanks for your help. Your answer have been helpful and points have been assigned.
    Kind Regards.
    Ignacio.

  • Ristrict Cancelling Process Order Confirmation (CORS) after FI MM period cl

    Showing current date as posting date after Cancelling Process Order Confirm:
    Issue with FICO and PP :-, after settlement (ko88) and all period end closing, system still allowed doing Cancelling Process Order Confirmation (CORS) and Showing current data as posting data
    For example:
    My order created on 30th September 2010 and order confirmed on the same day ie my posted date (30th September 2010)
    I have done order reversal on 3rd October 2010 and posting date should be 3rd October 2010 but system showing current data as posting data. Can you please guide me why this unusual behavior happening

    Hi Arun
    Is this  congif change will help me
              1)In BS22 first search for TECO.
               2)Double Click on TECO.
               3)New entry.
               4)Now search FI posting.
               5)Select status as Prohibited
    My Requirement : Ristrict Cancelling Process Order Confirmation (CORS) after FI, MM period closed, and Materail Ledger done
    I want to ristrict the (CORS) reversal of Process Order Confirmation after FI MM ML closed
    right now as per standard its giving warning masage as " Posting with carent date YES or NO, if you say YES then system doing CORS on system carent date, i want to restrict it
    Is above steps you refered will help me
    please confirm
    Regards
    MKbinnal

  • In the closure of Adobe, the process remains active and takes too much resource processor.   Expected results:The process AdobRd32.exe has to be correctly closed.

    In the closure of Adobe, the process remains active and takes too much resource processor.
    Expected results:The process AdobRd32.exe has to be correctly closed.

    I'm not sure on a Mac, but when I have this issue, I simply kill the thread (task-manager/processes/select the process, kill thread)
    I have had no ill effects doing this.
    It is my belief, it is the cloud, since they have a dcc connection, you can disconnect from the cloud, close everything, and the cloud is still connected to you. This is a feature of their update process I suppose.(speculation)  Additionally, I remember reading somewhere this issue was due to applying administrative permission at the instigation of the installation. (which I do allow *some* trusted companies to have this so updates can be applied during my downtime. ) 
    I have never had any overt issues after killing the thread and I have done that many times.
    Hope this helps

  • Urgent Correction cancellation

    Can anyone tell me how to close an urgent correction, the associated change request and support message after the change request has been approved but then the decision is made that no work is required.  The developer has not been assigned to the urgent correction and no transports have been created.

    Hai Nanacy,
    If the urgent correction is in created state you can go to action and click withdraw correction.This will close the Urgent correction and the preceeding document i.e., change request will be changed to to be approved status.Then you need to close the Change request manually and close the support desk also manually.
    Please revert for any clarification,
    Thanks and regards,
    Avinash.

  • No Automatic confirm for TO from PC

    Dear Expert,
    I will use external racking system and use idoc to the interface.  I have problem when using Posting change movement type 309, when source and destination bin is same bin. The TO showing the first line AS1 - 922 was automatically confirm and 2nd line 922 - AS1 no yet confirmed
    Our scenario need that both of line item should not confirmed, and will confirm using idoc.
    I already deactivate all setting auto confirmation in storage type, define movement type and interfacing movement type MM-WM.
    There is any advise to deactivate automatic confirm, or any users exist?...
    regards,
    Irwan

    Hello Irwan,
    this is a unlikely behaviour for posting changes TOs.
    In older releases (as far as I rembember), it was possible to get 1st item created unconfirmed but it was not possible to confirm the 1st item with a difference.
    The difference behaviour is the reason why it does not make too much sense to leave the 1st item unconfirmed after creation, because it was - and is - still not possible to confirm it with a difference or use a WMCATO to cancel it.
    So even if you manage to get it created unconfirmed and sent it by WMTORD, the only WMTOCO for this item is a confirmation, even if your subsystem does not find the stock/SU at the source bin. The difference hast to be reported in 2nd item all the time.
    We integrated this in our subsystem by detecting a posting change TO with 1st confirmed item and do not create a WMTOCO for this item after executing the posting.
    Best regards,
    Matthias

  • EREC :  To send automatic confirmation mail

    hi experts,
    Is possible to send automatic confirmation mail to the candidate's e-mail after competing application ?
    can it be done through process template ?
    Is there any standart workflows for this ?
    Regards
    Garayev

    Hi,
    I'd like to add a general thought
    When I learned SAP workflow (I admit, quite some years ago) there was a rule that SAP delivered workflows are in every case only examples you can check to get an impression what the application is capable of but they are never meant for production use. So you should never use SAP workflows in production. You might copy them but I see this as an option only for one or two of the e-recruiting example workflows. The others are just unmaintainable if you add everything for a production scenario.
    Similar rule applies to the SAP entries in customizing tables. While it is quite nice to use the e-recruitng search customizing from standard delivery as it is really a hell of work to do this from scratch, the activity customizing is anywhere between questionable and nonsense. Esp. with EhP 4 and above where SAP changed the application in a way that leads to new design recommendations for the acitvivity customizing but did not change the examples. The way to go is to delete the SAP entries and create a process and activity set really reflecting the project needs. So again the SAP example workflows won't match as you will have your ovn activity types.
    Rgds.
    Roman

  • The requests imported within an urgent correction, getting reimorted in MC

    Hello All
    Using change request management, I found that when we are importing normal corrections, the previous imported requests via urgent corrections are getting re-imported in to the production. It’s the standard configuration that SAP provided, but its going to be trouble if its going to overwrite the previous imported changes.
    Does any one know how to resolve this issue to avoid re-importing of already imported requests in maintenance cycle [MC]?  Is there any way to resolve this issue?
    Urgent help will be appreciated,
    Thanks & Regards
    Sharmishtha

    Hi Jason
    I am using solution manager 4.0 SP 12, with default functionality I am facing following issue.
    For example request T1 is released from Dev and imported in QA, then after PRD in urgent correction. In maintenance cycle i.e. normal correction, request T2 is released from Dev, but while import in QA, its importing T1 and T2, same happens when we are trying to import it PRD, its importing again T1 and then T2.
    This is happening because requests are getting import with “import again” tp option, but its set default for preliminary transports i.e. urgent correction. As its happening via change request management I don’t know where do we can change/set this option or change these default configuration settings.
    Its problem if its try to import the already import request as it may have impact on the current functionality as per our users & client’s concerns.
    Will you please help me in this ?
    Waiting for reply;
    Regards,
    Sharmishtha

  • Getting confirmation mail after sending PO to a supplier

    Is there any fuctionalality of getting confirmation mail after the vendor receives a purchase order (output condition is set for the PO  medium is external send).If yes, who will get this confirmation mail , the creator of the PO or the buyer of the purchasing group??

    A purchase order response (POR) can be created in response to a purchase order (PO) in the Enterprise Buyer System if
    ·        An XML message is received from the vendor in response to a PO or
    ·        It is created manually by a desktop user (for example an purchasing assistant) or a purchaser (professional user)
    In both cases, a POR (business object BUS2209) is created and the associated start conditions (predefined and delivered activated) are evaluated, causing different workflows to be started:
    For details, check : http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm40/helpdata/en/45/87a34098022a54e10000000a1550b0/content.htm

Maybe you are looking for