Automount and user rights

Dear readers and admins
Accoring the document Autofs.pdf from Apple itself, I did set up the following aoutmounts.
/Volumes/Users/thomas/Music -fstype=afp afp://thomas:[email protected]/music/thomas/Music
/Volumes/Users/thomas/Pictures -fstype=afp afp://thomas:[email protected]/photo/thomas/Pictures
/Volumes/Users/thomas/Movies -fstype=afp afp://thomas:[email protected]/video/thomas/Movies
This did work for the first two entries.
As I did decide to add the third one, I face now the following problems.
1.) All three mount points ar no more accessable. The user and group right did change at the time of mounting from "Username Staff" to "_spotlight wheel". I'm no more able to change with chown, chmod or else. This is even NOT possible if I'm connected with the activated Root account.
2.) As I'm using my system in an other language then English, the nest glitch is, that ONLY the mount point "Pictures" will have the translated name "Bilder". The mount point "Music" is changing between the original name and the translated name "Musik" every second. And lastly, the mount point Movies doesn't show the translated name "Filme" at all.
My main problem is #1. How can I change or at least delete the wrong mount points. If I try it, it tells me "mv: cannot rename a mount point" or "
thomas:thomas root# chown thomas:wheel Movies/
chown: Movies/: Operation not permitted".
Does anyone have a solution next to reinstall the hole system?
Thank you for anyones help and suggestions.
Regards
Thomas Thaler

When you execute SQL commands from PL/SQL blocks or procedure the GRANTS has to be direct and not through ROLE,
exec sys.dbms_lock.sleep(5) this will work from SQL . You can check this by typing SEZT ROLE NONE and then try to execute exec sys.dbms_lock.sleep(5), It may not work since the grant was through ROLE and not to the user.
thanks

Similar Messages

Help setting up accounts and user rights for students

hi there, we've just bought an xserve for a college classroom running 20 imac clients and me being new to the xserve and macs in general wondered if you guys can tell me the workflow for setting user accounts up and getting the students to log onto the xserve domain with their accounts. so that the xserve can give their imacs the restrcitions for their use (user rights basically) how the imacs log on has really got me stumped as with windows it does it on logging in? any help would be appreciated

I've just realised that you have to manually remove some stuff from the classes such as reference to J2Se classes.
How do you do this.

Admin and user rights for change active airport

Hello alltogether,
my son has a new MacBook (System 10.5) for his school and he learn with the computer in all school-subjects. So I create two users, admin and one for him. After he has install all applications that he need for school, I gave the admin a password. Now my son can't install applications or change system settings. But i must give him admin rights, because when he stay at school, he must change the airport environment for school and if he stay at home he must change it back to home. Is it not possible to set the rights for a not admin user so, that he can change the airport environment?
Thanks for reading.
Regards,
Tommy

If he needs admin status to use the wireless connection, then you need to make him an admin user. As far as I know, there is no partial admin configuration.

Grants and User rights

Hi,
I do not understand the following situation:
- Grant execute is given to EXECUTE_CATALOG_ROLE
- EXECUTE_CATALOG role is part of the DBA role
- User tiger is in the DBA role
As user tiger the following statement can be executed:
exec sys.dbms_lock.sleep(5) --> works fine.
But if I try to create the following procedure still as user tiger:
create or replace procedure pma_lock is
begin
sys.dbms_lock.SLEEP(5);
end;
I get the error PLS-00201: Identifier "SYS.DBMS_LOCK" must be declared.
Why is this so ? Where is the difference between executing and creating a procedure ?
Thank you for your help and explination
Peter

When you execute SQL commands from PL/SQL blocks or procedure the GRANTS has to be direct and not through ROLE,
exec sys.dbms_lock.sleep(5) this will work from SQL . You can check this by typing SEZT ROLE NONE and then try to execute exec sys.dbms_lock.sleep(5), It may not work since the grant was through ROLE and not to the user.
thanks

Windows 8 and User Rights - Access store but not install other programs

Hi, I wonder if someone can help,
I am trying to find out if it is possible through Active Directory to set up a group policy so that a user will be able to install apps from the windows store but be unable to install any other applications. I have seen that the store can be enabled or disabled
from windows server 2012, but have yet to find out if this is sufficient to allow store installs but no other external applications.
THanks

Hi Jon,
In addition to Martin’s reply, regarding Applocker, the following articles can be referred to for information.
AppLocker Step-by-Step Guide
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd723686(v=WS.10).aspx
Understanding AppLocker Rules
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd759068.aspx
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Licensing and user rights for speech features in Mac OS 9.

Are they to be used only for non-commercial personal uses?
Are they free to use for anything as long as you give Apple attribution?
For example, if they were to be used as voices in an iOS game, would it need to be free, be fine commercially, need to pay a license fee or simply be disallowed at all?
Thanks very much.

Is it in any way like vocaloid or UTAU, which lets you use it for any purpose, even commercially as long as it follows the law (and is not used to defame people)?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocaloid
http://utau.wikia.com/wiki/UTAU_wiki

Diagnostics/Tuning pack and user rights

What roles should a user get (minimally) to be able to use the packs fully? I have found some info on SQL Access Advisor, but still looking for the rest of the functionality.
Any idea[b] where I can find this information?
Cheers,
Mike

http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/oem/pdf/ds_config_pack.pdf

When using the camera downloader in Adobe Bridge CS6 with Nikon D5200 we are unable to see previews of the photos and it is very slow to download. The issue occurs under a the users rights, but not under admin level. This is a new issue

When using the camera downloader in Adobe Bridge CS6 with Nikon D5200 we are unable to see previews of the photos and it is very slow to download. The issue occurs under a the users rights, but not under admin level. This is a new issue.

Hi Jdentremont,
Lync client gets user photos by first querying the Address Book Web Query (ABWQ) service on the server, which is exposed through the Distribution List Expansion web service. The client receives
the image file and then copies it to the user's cache to avoid downloading the image each time it needs to be displayed. The attribute values returned from the query are also stored in the cached Address Book Service entry for the user. The Address Book Service
deletes all cached images every 24 hours, which means that it can take up to 24 hours for new user images to be updated in the cache on the server.
To troubleshoot your problem, please follow the steps below:
1. Navigate to
“X:\share\1-WebServices-1\ABfiles\000000000\000000000” folder. (ABS file share)
You should see some photo files in this folder as the following screenshot.
2. Delete all the files in this folder.
3. On test PC, delete local cache files.
%userprofile%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Office\15.0\Lync\[email protected]
4. Sign-in Lync with the test account.
5. Go back to the ABS file share, check if there is any Photo file in the folder.
Best regards,
Eric
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Firefox has remberd a password to a website ... chessatwork and I get loged in to my main page and when I click on any link it takes me right back to my log in page, where it has it stored.... password and user name,,, whats up and how do I turn that off?

Firefox has remberd a password to a website ... chessatwork and I get loged in to my main page and when I click on any link it takes me right back to my log in page, where it has it stored.... password and user name,,, whats up and how do I turn that off? chessatwork has ran great for me for many yrs, then one day I down loaded firefox and went to play chess on this site chessatwork.com, well the window popped up asking to remember the log in and pass word and so I said ok, and it did, but now when I click log in and I go to my main page (home) and click on any link, say to play game I return right back to log in

See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Deleting_autocomplete_entries<br />
Remove a saved password here: Tools > Options > Security: Passwords: "Saved Passwords" > "Show Passwords"
You may also need to remove the cookies from that website.<br />
* Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"

Proper user and group rights

Dear readers and admins
My question is about the "correct" setting of the user and group rights, so the following is possible. It relates to Server 10.3 and to 10.4.
Requirements:
Group 1 = "Regular user"
Group 2 = "Administration, Accounting"
User 1 and 2 belong to Group 1, users 3 and 4 belong to Group 2.
User 1 & 2 must have read/write access to files and folders in Group 1, but may not have access to files and folders of Group 2.
User 1 & 2 must be in a position of creation and deletion of file and directory of Group 1, as if they were their own files and directories. I.e. User 2 must be in a position to delete or change files and directories that an other user of Group 1 has created.
User 3 & 4 must have read and write access to files and directories of Group 1 & 2. They must be able to creating and changing such files and directories, as if they were their own files and directories. I.e. User 3 & 4 must be able to create and change files and directories which belong to user 1 & 2.
As I understand it, this can be achieved with ACL's under Server 10.6.
Am I right?
What would such a structure look like with ACL's?
I unfortunately don't have a server 10.6 running, as, down due to technical problems, my server is down.
Thank you in advance for your help.
All a happy new year.
Regards
Thomas Thaler

Yes - and it's pretty easy.
1. You would create whatever share points you would like (very easy to do)
2. You would make sure in Workgroup Manager you have the users assigned to the correct groups that you discussed.
3. On the folders for Group 1 you would add ACL permissions of Full Control for Group 1 and Full Control for Group 2.
4. On the folders for Group 2 you would add an ACL permission of Full Control for Group 2.

Extended user rights and 500 users limits on a PDF Form

Hello,
I read that there's 500 users limits for using extended user rights on Acrobat Pro 9.
Here's my situation:
- I built an application PDF form with extended user rights for Adobe Reader users to save the form. And I'm going to be hosting it on the web for users to download the PDF form to their local hard drive.
- The form will have a button to submit to a web page with a script for processing FDF, XFDF, XML, or HTP form export.
My question is:
1. Would it be violating the 500 users limits if more than 500 users download the form and save the PDF after filling out fields, but not submit the data back to the server?
2. What would happen if more than 500 responses are received through above method? Would new visitors still be able to save the PDF form for their archive purpose after downloading it from our web site?
Thanks.

Can Adobe's licensing department define "extract"? I know there is a lot of confusion here and I'm trying to understand.
Here is our scenario: We have developed an Adobe fillable form which we will be sending to 1000 customers. Customers can open the form (in Reader v9.5 and greater) and fill out the form, validate it and then print it. The customers are not sending the PDF files back to us and the PDF data is not being collected so there is no data we can extract from Adobe files (we are not that advanced yet). Customers will just print the information, then fax or send back to us by U.S. Mail.
When we receive the completed information (via fax/mail, not PDF), we read information off our form. Does Adobe consider reading our information “extracting” with our eyes? I’m not sure how they can consider that extracting? I would think Adobe owns the mechanism (aka PDF file) for validating our content, but they wouldn’t own the content on our form if we want to physically read it, right?
Adobe needs to clarify this more clearly and I’ve ready their interpretation of the Policy, but it doesn’t address this scenario. http://www.adobe.com/products/eulas/pdfs/Reader_Extension_Policy_A10-5-31-2011.pdf
George, I don't think you are an Adobe Employee. I see you are a MVP, but you are not officiall speaking for Adobe are you?
---Thanks.

Upgrading to Acrobat Pro XI / Adobe Reader XI and enabling user rights

My company is a little behind on software updates and I'm going to ask for Adobe Reader XI to pushed out company wide since allows the user to save a filled-in PDF form.
Right now I'm using Acrobat Pro X, and suspect I will need to upgrade as well.
My questions are:
With the new-found ability of Reader to finally be able to save a filled in form, how does this effect the "enabling user rights" scenario?
Is it needed if the entire company is using Adobe Reader XI?
I did a test in Adobe Reader XI, and sure enough, I was able to save a filled-in form...BUT, I could not digitally sign the form.
Is this where the enabling user rights is still mandatory?
Or is this because the form was designed in Acrobat Pro X?
Does Acrobat Pro XI work around this?
I know I don't need to upgrade to Acrobat Pro XI to continue making forms, but should I?
Thanks for your feed back, and I look forward to reading your replies

Thank you, George, for the prompt reply!
I suspected as much, but couldn't find a clear cut answer in my searches.
The tab order update alone has convinced me its worth pushing for the new Acrobat Pro XI.
The update to Adobe Reader XI will make many of our forms easier to get into the digital workflow, and I'm looking forward to getting use further away from a paper-based system

Acrobat 8 Form - "This Operation Not Permitted" error when enable user rights and open Reader X

I have a form which is causing me fits. It was created from an existing PDF form to which I added data fields using LifeCyele Designer.
When I enable user rights to the document and try to open it in either Adobe Reader X or Acrobat 8 Pro I get the message "This operation is not permitted" twice. Once I get rid of the messages the form works fine.
Is there a way to upload the form to this forum for someone to look at it?
With my limited knowledge, I did try to investigate embeded font issues and hidden object issues. But after much work I've not gotten much closer to a resolution.
Best,
David

You cannot upload the file to the forum, but you can use Acrobat.com or Dropbox if you have an account. If you ha e no other options I'd be happy to take a look: acroscript at gmail dot com

Advanced user rights and 500 users of my PDF Form

I am owner of Acrobat Pro & Livecycle Designer ES. I have done interactive pdf form and i would like to sell it to my client. My client would like to put it in intertet for his customer. I suppose that would be more than 500 answers in a year. They will collect data and post by e-mail or post to him.
What should i do to do it legally (i would like to save it locally)?

LiveCycle Reader Extensions is (was) part of the ADEP enterprise portfolio. There are no price lists as each package is tailor-made for a customer - to discuss pricing and installation options you must speak directly to Adobe Customer Support.
martinbartosh wrote:
@Bernd. OK i understand your point of view. So please tell me how is it with that server product. May i rent this product from hosting company or only i can buy it for heavy cash and put it on my own server? Is it allow to resell? Where is price list? Why i can`t find any reseller to rent me that server for small company. Is that only allowed for enterprise who has thousands of servers and did not resell it to small people. Please give me opportunity for cash (which small firm can pay) to save it localy without changing advanced user rights. If i had opportunity i would like to buy it but i fell that i can`t. Maybe i am wrong. So please tell me what should i buy to do that. Please tell me also how much it cost and where is any price list to that. I represent few persons company and i can afford normal price software as Creative Suite and not afford buying server for 50K or something like that.

User rights required to install and run netmon on windows 7

What are minimal user rights required to install and run Netmon on Windows 7
Senior IT Systems Administator

You have to belong to the Netmon Users group.
Thanks,
Paul

Automount and user rights

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for