Avast! antivirus Mac Edition

I've been looking for anti-virus software for my iMac and am wondering if anyone is using the above "home edition" (or commercial for that matter). I'm interested in securing opinions of it.
thanks!

There are currently NO OS X viruses (don't get complacent, however).
To stop yourself from passing windows viruses on to your friends, I recommend the free ClamXav.
Good luck!

Similar Messages

Avast Antivirus for mac or Eset Cyber Security 6

Considering many threats nowadays on the Internet, including malware related to false pages, phishing pages, Java threats, I consider important to count on a security solution.
There are 2 of them I personally consider the best ones on the moment: Avast Antivirus for Mac and Eset Cyber Security 6.
Well, considering two important aspects - detection (higher scores it's better) and performance (lower system usage resources - like processors usage - it's better).
What is your opinion about them considering your experience?
Which one would you choose?
Thanks in advance!

"Avast" is perhaps the worst of the whole wretched lot of commercial "security" products for the Mac. It's worse than the imaginary "viruses" you're worried about. Not only does it fail to protect you, it destabilizes and slows down your computer, and it sometimes or always corrupts the network settings and the permissions of files in your home folder. Removing it may not repair all the damage, and neither will Disk Utility or even reinstalling OS X.
1. This comment applies to malicious software ("malware") that's installed unwittingly by the victim of a network attack. It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the victim's computer. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it. If you have reason to suspect that you're the target of such an attack, you need expert help.
OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user, but internally Apple calls it "XProtect." The malware recognition database is automatically checked for updates once a day; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
The following caveats apply to XProtect:
It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't necessarily been tested by Apple, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
For the reasons given above, App Store products, and other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. OS X security is based on user input. Never click anything reflexively.
4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is presumably effective against known attacks, but maybe not against unknown attacks. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
5. XProtect, Gatekeeper, and MRT reduce the risk of malware attack, but they're not absolute protection. The first and best line of defense is always your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and the malware attacker. If you're smarter than he thinks you are, you'll win.
That means, in practice, that you never use software that comes from an untrustworthy source, or that does something inherently untrustworthy. How do you know what is trustworthy?
Any website that prompts you to install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one, is untrustworthy.
A web operator who tells you that you have a “virus,” or that anything else is wrong with your computer, or that you have won a prize in a contest you never entered, is trying to commit a crime with you as the victim. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
Pirated copies or "cracks" of commercial software, no matter where they come from, are unsafe.
Software of any kind downloaded from a BitTorrent or from a Usenet binary newsgroup is unsafe.
Software that purports to help you do something that's illegal or that infringes copyright, such as saving streamed audio or video for reuse without permission, is unsafe. All YouTube "downloaders" are in this category, though not all are necessarily harmful.
Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, must be downloaded directly from the developer’s website. If it comes from any other source, it's unsafe.
Even signed applications, no matter what the source, should not be trusted if they do something unexpected, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it — not JavaScript — in your browsers.
Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a lock icon in the address bar with the abbreviation "https" when visiting a secure site.
Follow the above guidelines, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself from malware.
7. Never install any commercial "anti-virus" or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they all do more harm than good, if they do any good at all. Any database of known threats is always going to be out of date. Most of the danger is from unknown threats. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use the free software ClamXav— nothing else.
Why shouldn't you use commercial "anti-virus" products?
Their design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere.
In order to meet that nonexistent threat, the software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
By modifying the operating system, the software itself may create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
8. ClamXav doesn't have these drawbacks. That doesn't mean it's entirely safe. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
ClamXav is not needed, and should not be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful only for detecting Windows malware. Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else.
A Windows malware attachment in email is usually easy to recognize. The file name will often be targeted at people who aren't very bright; for example:
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥!!!!!!!H0TBABEZ4U!!!!!!!.AVI♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.exe
ClamXav may be able to tell you which particular virus or trojan it is, but do you care? In practice, there's seldom a reason to use ClamXav unless a network administrator requires you to run an anti-virus application.
9. The greatest harm done by security software, in my opinion, is in its effect on human behavior. It does little or nothing to protect people from emerging threats, but if they get a false sense of security from it, they may feel free to do things that expose them to higher risk. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.
10. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.

Avast for mac will not install unless I close safari and mail but both are closed. I turned off computer and started again but same message appears.

avast antivirus for mac will not install unless I close safari and mail which are both off. I have shut down my imac and started again but same message when I tired to install. Help please.

jejerry wrote:
do you use any antivirus software ...
In General 3rd Party AV Software is Not Required as Mac OS X tends to look after itself.
Read Here > https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4545776?tstart=0
See Here > Antivirus Discussion

Is the "free" version of Sophos AntiVirus Home Edition worth downloading??

Is the Free Version of Sophos AntiVirus Home Edition worth downloading??

Mac OS X versions 10.6.7 and later have built-in detection of known Mac malware in downloaded files. The recognition database is automatically updated once a day; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders. In most cases, there’s no benefit from any other automated protection against malware.
The most effective defense against malware is your own intelligence. All known malware that affects an up-to-date Mac OS system takes the form of trojans that can only operate if the victim is duped into running them. If you're smarter than the malware attacker thinks you are, you won't be duped. That means, primarily, that you never install software from an untrustworthy source. How do you know a source is untrustworthy?
Any website that prompts you to install a “codec,” “plug-in,” or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown site, merely in order to use the site, is untrustworthy.
A web operator who tells you that you have a “virus,” or that anything else is wrong with your computer, or that you have won a prize in a contest you never entered, is trying to commit a crime with you as the victim.
“Cracked” versions of commercial software downloaded from a bittorrent are likely to be infected.
Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, must be downloaded directly from the developer’s website. No intermediary is acceptable.
Disable Java (not JavaScript) in your web browser(s). Few websites have Java content nowadays, so you won’t be missing much. This setting is mandatory in Mac OS X 10.5.8 or earlier, because Java in those versions has bugs that make it unsafe to use on the Internet. Those bugs will probably never be fixed.
Follow these guidelines, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can reasonably be.
Never install any commercial "anti-virus" products for the Mac, as they all do more harm than good. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use ClamXav — nothing else.

I ran an avast antivirus scan on my iMac because it was running slowly (I thought possibly cos it had avast installed anyway!) It reported that I have an infection with what it describes as an HTML:Bankfraud-BRO(Trj)

The infection is reported as
.Spotlight-V100/Store-V2/4A387C06-4BBA-43C0-96F4-CF61C65E524C/Cache/0000/0000/00 14/1373591.txt
Can anyone tell me if this is an infection and what to do about it?
I tried to isolate it in the avast antivirus chest as a precaution but received an error code and was unable to do so

It's not malware. If it's anything at all, it's the indexed text of a fraudulent email message.
"Avast" is perhaps the worst of the whole wretched lot of commercial "security" products for the Mac. It's worse than the imaginary "viruses" you were worried about when you installed it. Not only does it fail to protect you, it throws false warnings, destabilizes and slows down your computer, and sometimes or always corrupts the network settings and the permissions of files in your home folder. Removing it may not repair all the damage, and neither will Disk Utility or even reinstalling OS X.
Back up all data, then remove "Avast" according to the developer's instructions. Reboot.
If you tried to remove Avast by dragging an application to the Trash, you'll have to reinstall it and follow the instructions linked above.
If you still have problems after following those instructions, post again.

I uploded the new itunes software and now my ipod touch is not getting reconized in my itunes. I went through all the trouble shooting support from apple. But I do have a avast antivirus on my computer i wonder if that is what is holding it up

I uploded the new itunes software and now my ipod touch is not getting reconized in my itunes. I went through all the trouble shooting support from apple. But I do have a avast antivirus on my computer i wonder if that is what is holding it up

Could be since it (security software) is listed as #5 in the following:
iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch: Device not recognized in iTunes for Windows

HT4236 on syncing photos to my iphone from my mac (iphoto), just 2 or 3 per event retain the edited verisons, the rest are shown in the original version. I'm confused by this. Is this a bug? Is there a way to see all the photos on the mac-edited version o

on syncing photos to my iphone from my mac (snow leopard) (iphoto), just 2 or 3 per event retain the edited verisons, the rest are shown in the original version. I'm confused by this. Is this a bug? Is there a way to see all the photos on the mac-edited version on iphn?

Thanks for your reply
I solved my problem,
Definitely a bug in syncing through itunes.
- Connect Iphone with MacBook Pro through USB
- Go to iphone on itunes, photos, deselect photo synchronization.
- Sync (all pics will be removed from iphone)
- Close itunes, iphoto, disconnect iphone
- Select in finder: (home)-pictures-iphoto library.
- Sec click on iphoto library and choose "show package contents"
- Delete iPod Photo Cache
- Close finder
- Empty trash
- Reconnect iphone
- Allow photo synchronization again and everything works smooth.
After this, changes made in iphoto are instantaneously reflected in iphone photos.
Once every hundred photos, one gets detached from iphoto and then changes are no longer reflected (buggy) :-(
In this case I erase the photo in iphoto, sync, go back to iphoto trash, reestablish the photo from the trash and sync again.
Hope this improves. Still have to try cloud though.
Thanks
RC

Bootcamp gtx 680 mac edition and windows 8.1 BLACKSCREEN

I have an MacPro 5,1 with EVGA GTX 680 Mac EDITION, with two SSD drives
1 SSD Mac OS X 10.8.5
1 SSD Windows 8.1
Using BootCamp5.1.5621 drivers on the MacPro.
DAY1
Put in the new Card OS X Booted Great, tested everything as expected. Then I booted over to Windows 8.1 Screen resolution came in at 640x480, so I rebooted. The screen was completely black on reboot.
DAY2
Read that Windows 8.1 was using old or expired drivers in its automatic driver updates, I safe-booted and disabled
like here
http://superuser.com/questions/665158/can-i-prevent-a-driver-from-being-installe d-with-windows-8-1
rebooted, still black screen.
DAY3 and DAY4
STEP1.
Safe Booted and got an app called DDU
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/550192/geforce-drivers/display-driver-u ninstaller-ddu-v12-6-0-released-03-17-14-/26/
I uninstalled ALL drivers for windows 8.1 I rebooted and under DEVICE MANAGER it saw my video card as the Generic Microsoft Video driver or whatever it was.
I then installed the EVGA drivers according to the EVGA website.
I tried Driver 335.23
During install SCREEN FLASHES BLACK, then BLACK FOREVER.
WENT BACK TO STEP1.
I tried Beta Driver 334.67
During install SCREEN FLASHES BLACK, then BLACK FOREVER.
WENT BACK TO STEP1.
I tried GEFORCE DRIVERS 334.89, 326.01, 327.23 and 335.23.
During install SCREEN FLASHES BLACK, then BLACK FOREVER.
WENT BACK TO STEP1.
DAY5
Safe Booted and got an app called DDU
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/550192/geforce-drivers/display-driver-u ninstaller-ddu-v12-6-0-released-03-17-14-/26/
I uninstalled ALL drivers for windows 8.1 I rebooted and under DEVICE MANAGER it saw my video card as the Generic Microsoft Video driver or whatever it was.
Then I went back to the BOOTCAMP folder, found the NVIDIA drivers for the video card and it ERRORS during the installation.
I can't even begin to explain how frustrated I am,
BTW the card is SUPER SOLID and runs Perfect in OS X.
I drowing in black screens...

It removed all extra peripherals and it worked. Ended up being an ATTOTECH card, that was making it crash.

To install firefox 5.0, message says avast1web rep20110101 will be disabled. What does this mean? Will it disable the avast antivirus installed on my computer?

What more can I tell you? Firefox recommends 5.0 be installed. When I try to do so, I get a message that says some addons are not compatible. specifically avast web rep 20110101. I have no idea what avast web rep 20110101 is and am concerned that it refers to the avast antivirus protection installed on my computer. I need to know if that is what the message means & that if I install 5.0, I will disable the antivirus protection.

Does this mean that Avast will continue to scan for viruses and protect my computer from harmful or malicious internet diseases?

Does 10.5.6 Support Dual displays for Radeon 9800 Pro Mac Edition cards?

Does 10.5.6 Support Dual displays for Radeon 9800 Pro Mac Edition cards?
And is there driver updates for anyone using the all-in-ones HP printers...has anyone been able to use their scanners since the update? and has the dual screen support been added to avoid the blue screen on startup?

The ATI Radeon 9600 PC/Mac edition 256 MB should work in the MDD G4. It has two DVI ports (one is dual-link and can support a 30" display). You will need adapters for ADC displays.

Can I replace an ATI RADEON 9800 PRO-(256MB)-MAC EDITION with Mac ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb Video Card For G4/G5

Hi,
I am trying to help a friend whose graphics card has bust.
The old one was an ATI RADEON 9800 PRO-(256MB)-MAC EDITION.
I've been looking on ebay and it seems a lot cheaper to get a Mac ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb Video Card For G4/G5.
Can I just swap them over? The connectors are not identical according to the photographs.
Thanks.

I'd like to thank everyone for all the really useful information in this thread. It helped me solve a similar problem, which I'll describe here briefly in case it helps someone else.
I have a 2004/5 dual 2 Ghz PowerPC G5 and an Apple Cinema HD display linked, as I later found out, with the now defunct ADC connector. The display suddenly started to look like that scene in The Matrix, when code falls like rain down the screen, and I worked out I needed to replace my Radeon 9800 pro video card (I discovered the board was blue when I removed a thick layer of dust).
I took japamac's excellent advice and bought a Geforce 6800 Ultra from the linked eBay seller in Hong Kong, who delivered it extremely quickly, along with the cables to plug it into the DVD drive power source and a CD with installation instructions. It was only then that I realised the card had two DVI connectors and my display needed ADC (I hadn't understood the difference).
eBay came to the rescue again with a seller who had a secondhand DVI to ADC adapter, which Apple produced when it phased out ADC about six years ago but no longer sells. It has its own power supply and looks like a large version of the Mac laptop power cables - and has added signifcantly to the pile of spaghetti under my desk.
Installing the Geforce 6800 Ultra is fiddly, and a bit scary if you're not used to delving into the insides of a Mac, but the instructions were clear and illustrated with useful photos. The video cable has four connectors. Two fit into the end of the card, the other two (linked in a Y shape) form a bridge between the DVD/superdrive and its power cable. You have to remove the DVD drive, unplug it, and then plug one of the two Y video card connectors into the DVD power cable and the other into the DVD drive itself. Then you replace the DVD drive, plug the two remaining cable connectors to the video card and ease it into the old card's AGP slot.
Finally, with the G5 reassembled, plug the adapter's DVI connection into the back of the card, plug the Cinema Display ADC cable into the adapter block, plug the adapter's USB cable into the G5 (this enables the the USB ports on the back of the display to work), and power up.
At the time of writing, the display has been up and running for a couple of hours and all seems fine.
Thanks again everyone for all your help and advice. If it wasn't for communities like this, it would be virtually impossible to solve problems with old but still serviceable Macs.

Early 2009 MacPro with GTX 285 (Mac Edition) - Dual Monitor Setup

Hey Guys - I tried going through the forum to find this, and I think I see some common responses, but wanted to detail my question and make sure I have it right.
I have a MacPro (early 2009) with the EVGA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition GPU. I replaced the GT120 that came with the MacPro. I was initially planning on attaching two monitors to the GTX 285, but I have heard rumors that for smoother performance, I should hook up the GT120 as well and hook up one monitor to that one.
However, I am reading posts regarding other configurations (4870 and GT120, etc), and it seems like there are different responses. Basically, I am looking for better performance for graphics demanding application (gaming, photo-edit, movie, etc).
Thanks for your time and responses ahead of time.

I'm so happy that you're soooo happy. If you were so so happy, I would be disappointed. Blessed? You honor me Japamac-san. I have not bestowed blessings in years, it must have been accidental. Well, I am getting old, there's a reason people move away from me on the subway. I'm glad you interpreted it that way.
Well, ok, the cats out of the bag. I do expect 10.6.2 to do something significant for this card. For gosh sake something has to one day justify this investment...
Both EVGA and Nvidia say it's all up to Apple.
Apple says,... well Apple never says anything,.. but since they sell it on their website one would think it was in their interest to do their best. It's really not nice to sell one card as a 200 dollar option, granted 350 by itself, and another for well over 400 that is only marginally better. It's like looking for a Ford, changing your mind for the Porsche, and ending up getting a Ford with a Porsche sticker on it. This card wails in Windows, how can Apple deny that performance to it's own OS?
While OS changes are incremental one doesn't necessarily expect that all things related to the industry will be. CUDA and Open CL are emerging technologies, but the 285 is real and out there. And it has been for quite some time now. Perhaps more honest marketing campaigns are needed, something like, "Here's the best video card for the Mac out there in existence, you'll just have to wait a few years to see that for yourself, maybe".
Nah, it's not right, you buy a product for what it is, not for what it could be. If it gets better over time that's great, but right from the start it should be worth the price. The 285 hasn't been that yet.
And we 285 owners waited for Snow, with all the talk of Apple's unleashing the power of the GPU. It came and the card ran slower. 10.6.1,... well at least the OS ran better. 10.6.2, well I can't say much about it, but if one can believe what they read, it looks like Apple is at least aware of certain things to be especially worked on. The question for me is to what degree they fine tune things. Can it really be as difficult to create a driver for Nvidia cards, unlike the drivers for ATIs which seem to work with such ease? It's almost like Apple and ATI are intrinsically bound somehow. For instance, with the 285 a new game like COD4 runs just perfectly for me with a 30" monitor, but another game under Rosetta runs not too well at all. Put the 4870 in and COD4 runs very well but not as good as the 285. The Rosetta game however runs great with the ATI. It's things like that I find to be very weird.
If the history of OS X has shown us anything
The history of anything only shows me we learn nothing from it. That's my biggest fear in this case, but I'm encouraged by what I hear.
Expecting 10.6.1 or even 10.6.2, .3, or even .4 to be perfect
That's an odd thing isn't it? How long would car companies last if they fine tuned their cars by analyzing how they failed and crashed for their customers on the road? "Yo, Edsel, I think we need a way to stop them once they're going".
Yet as much as we pay for our computers and equipment we realize that the companies are using us as their R&D Depts. It's an interesting cycle, we're sold things that don't work well, give feedback to make them work well, and next time we buy the better product and it starts all over again.
Well, it's been an interesting chat, full of sound and fury, signifying... well, probably something.

Virus detected by avast antivirus in the arch-0.7.iso file?

i was running avast antivirus for windows when it found a virus in the mailcap package
extract the mailman package..
browse to /home/mailman/tests/msgs/nimda.txt
i suppose that the virus scanner went crazy cause of the title of the file, but is that supposed to happen..?weird..(note: i set the scan to "thorough scan" and "scan within archives")
anyway, for anyone who's interested..the contents of the file are :
Received: from tom.interq.or.jp (tom.interq.or.jp [210.172.128.229])
by imap.interq.or.jp with ESMTP id f8J1sCHb006936
for <[email protected]>;
Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:54:13 +0900 (JST)
Received: from master.debian.org ([email protected] [216.234.231.130])
by tom.interq.or.jp with ESMTP id f8J1sAS04533
for <[email protected]>; ) Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:54:11 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:54:11 +0900 (JST)
From: <[email protected]>
Subject: C:WINNTmmc.exebqinsghtmstaskicwconnhtml helpdialerhypertrmgotodlgmsicwie6bakieexbqqviewie6bakeudcediticwdldwintlreadmehypertrmmsicwnpbqv32hypertrmicwhelpieexmscreatehmmapiwrite32npbqs32fixiehtml helpicwconn1write32ie6setupicwtutorieexsupportsetuphtml helplover.com.install
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
type="multipart/alternative";
boundary="====_ABC1234567890DEF_===="
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Unsent: 1
--====_ABC1234567890DEF_====
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="====_ABC0987654321DEF_===="
--====_ABC0987654321DEF_====
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<iframe src=3Dcid:EA4DMGBP9p height=3D0 width=3D0>
</iframe></BODY></HTML>
--====_ABC0987654321DEF_====--
--====_ABC1234567890DEF_====
Content-Type: audio/x-wav;
name="readme.exe"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: <EA4DMGBP9p>
XXXX
--====_ABC1234567890DEF_====
i dont understand any of this at all..so can anyone please explain what this means, and why the scanner might have picked up this file... thanks ..

According to this [URL=http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-26.html]security advisory[/URL], Nimda was a worm in late 2001. I guess that file in the package is for testing mailman's worm blocking (judging from the filename, I've never seen/used mailman before).

PNY Quadro K5000 Mac Edition - Audio Problems via DP/HDMI adapter

Hello,
as stated in the topic I have some troubles to get the sound working on my TV witch is plugged into the Mac Pro via HDMI/DP adapter.
Setup:
Mac Pro 5.1 with OSX 10.9.5
Graphics PNY Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
My Question ist this: Ist there a Problem with the OSX, the Card or the Adapter?
The Macs Internal sound works fine. The TV plugged into a Laptop via HDMI works too.
If anyone has a similar Setup or a clue whats going on, I would very much apriciate some help.
best regards from germany,
osslord

Do you have anything plugged into the headphone jack? If so unplug it.
Next try resetting the SMC anf VRAM
Intel-based Macs: Resetting the System Management Controller (SMC)
About NVRAM and PRAM

Gefoce 8800 GT (Mac Edition) for Gamers???

So...If buy a Geforce 8800 GT (Mac Edition) in a bootcamp partition with Vista x64 i can get the best performance for games like crysis, gears of war and more.....??????
And can i use SLI mode on this card???
Cause I was planning to build up a PC only for GAMES.......
Thanks!

I had a hard time getting bootcamp to partition it the way I wanted to.
What I actually did was I used Disk Utilities, partitioned it the way I wanted it. I had a 250GB HD (~232GB formatted), I have 80 GB for Windows XP, 100 GB for Windows Vista, the rest as a FAT32 data drive (if I want to transfer data between the two operating system, or a data partition for the two to be able to read). At first I tried 100GB for both Vista and XP but I got confused not knowing which one was which when I wanted to install, that's the reason for the difference in size, use whatever you wish. Make sure when you partition it with Disk utility, all the partitions you want Windows to be able to use is "MS-DOS" (which is FAT32). Windows Vista will need to reformat it to NTFS but you must format it as MS-DOS in Disk Utilities first.
You do not need to run Boot Camp assistant to get Windows on your system. After disk utility finished partitioning to your desire, restart your MP and hold down the option key. Select the windows installation CD. After you finished installing windows and it reboots, it might take you to OS X again. Just make sure when you reboot it again, hold down the option key, now it will show you another hard drive saying Windows.
The tricky part when installing is knowing which partition to install on. For Windows XP, the hard drives spaces are listed as MB, rather than GB.
When you have installed multiple windows (XP and Vista), if you hold down the option key, you will only see: Macintosh HD (hard drive), Windows (hard drive), and any other bootable disc you have. If you select the Windows (hard drive), it will go to a black screen for a few seconds, then it gives you the windows boot option (DOS-style), you get 30 seconds to select Windows Vista or "Older version of Windows" (which is XP).
I cannot confirm this but you need to install XP first, then Vista. As Vista is a more "later" version of Windows, it knows not to overwrite the boot-sector of XP.
To install the hardware drivers, just put in your MP restore disc 1 and run the setup.exe file, it has all the drivers for your system.
I'm sure there are better guides to help you by searching Google, but this is what I know.
Message was edited by: Supreme Virtue

Avast! antivirus Mac Edition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for