Avaya calls to CUCM 8.6: Call Park/Hold Fail

This may be similar to the issue I posted here:  https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3496110#3496110
4 digit dialing from an Avaya system to a CUCM 8.6.2 server works fine, the Avaya is set as an h.323 gateway in CUCM.
Once the call is active if the Cisco phone places the Avaya caller on hold they hear no hold music and the call stays active until the Cisco phone tries to retrieve it.  Then it's a fast busy on both end.
The same thing happens with calls placed on park.
Any suggestions?

Hi
Are you using G711 or G729 for these calls? If using G729 the CUCM software MTP cannot be used as it only supports g711, you would have to use a gateway-based MTP.
Try setting the calls to G711 to see if it works as a test.
Aaron

Similar Messages

  • CUCM 8.6 Call Forwarding to External Number Issue

    Hello,
    Call forwarding worked without problems, we could forward our phones to external numbers and everything was ok, when somebody called to my phone, I could  got the call to my cell phone.
    But now when I forward my phone to external number and try to call to my phone I get busy trigger.
    We didn't change configuration or install any update.
    I think its my ISP-s problem, to whom we have SIP Trunk.
    I don't understand log file, so can you tell what is the problem?
    Here is log:
    057729XXXX is called party, cell phone number
    original calling party number is 240XXXXX, but it is forwarded to 2484XXX
    INVITE sip:2484XXX@ISP-IP:5060 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP MY-CUCM-IP:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1003a84126249
    From: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM>;tag=4052091~294be736-ce3b-450f-a7f1-c801f3cc9a7e-27746002
    To: <sip:2484XXX@ISP-IP>
    Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:34:18 GMT
    Call-ID: 16d82e80-2b11a45a-c43e7-84450d0a@MY-CUCM-IP
    Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces
    Min-SE:  1800
    User-Agent: Cisco-CUCM8.6
    Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    Expires: 180
    Allow-Events: presence
    Supported: X-cisco-srtp-fallback
    Supported: Geolocation
    Cisco-Guid: 0383266432-0000065536-0000191815-2219117834
    Session-Expires:  1800
    P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>
    Remote-Party-ID: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
    Contact: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP:5060>
    Max-Forwards: 68
    Content-Type: application/sdp
    Content-Length: 215
    v=0
    o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 4052091 1 IN IP4 MY-CUCM-IP
    s=SIP Call
    c=IN IP4 MY-CUCM-IP
    t=0 0
    m=audio 29790 RTP/AVP 8 101
    a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
    a=ptime:20
    a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
    a=fmtp:101 0-15
    |2,100,56,1.173711429^MY-CUCM-IP^MTP_3
    17:34:18.526 |EnvProcessUdpPort - EnvProcessUdpHandler::fireSignal() varId = 2|2,100,56,1.173711429^MY-CUCM-IP^MTP_3
    17:34:18.526 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::fireSignal - SEND: index = 2, handler = 0xb2d59c98|*^*^*
    17:34:18.526 |EnvProcessUdpPort::fireSignal - SEND, destination = ISP-IP:5060|*^*^*
    17:34:18.526 |EnvProcessUdpPort - EnvProcessUdpHandler::send(buff, 1172, ISP-IP:5060)|*^*^*
    17:34:18.536 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::handle_input - handle = 334|*^*^*
    17:34:18.536 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::handle_input   Status: 0, Id: 2|*^*^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_UdpDataInd: Incoming SIP UDP message size 358 from ISP-IP:[5060]:
    [12623361,NET]
    SIP/2.0 100 Trying
    Call-ID: 16d82e80-2b11a45a-c43e7-84450d0a@MY-CUCM-IP
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    From: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>;tag=4052091~294be736-ce3b-450f-a7f1-c801f3cc9a7e-27746002
    To: <sip:2484XXX@ISP-IP>;tag=sip+1+b3a00013+867def6a
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP MY-CUCM-IP:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1003a84126249
    Server: CISCO-SBC/2.x
    Content-Length: 0
    |2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/Stack/Info/0x0/ccsip_spi_get_msg_type returned: 2 for event 1|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/Stack/Transport/0x0/context=(nil)|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/Stack/Transport/0x0/gConnTab=0xf484290, addr=ISP-IP, port=5060, connid=2, transport=UDP|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/Stack/Info/0x0/Return existing connection for port 5060 connId 2|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/Stack/Info/0x0/Checking Invite Dialog|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/Stack/Info/0xb1b50c90/INVITE response with no RSEQ - disable IS_REL1XX|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/SIPHandler/ccbId=0/scbId=0/sip_stop_timer: type=SIP_TIMER_TRYING value=500 retries=3|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/Stack/States/0xb1b50c90/0xb1b50c90 : State change from (STATE_SENT_INVITE, SUBSTATE_NONE)  to (STATE_RECD_PROCEEDING, SUBSTATE_PROCEEDING_PROCEEDING)|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/SIPHandler/ccbId=0/scbId=0/sip_stop_timer: type=SIP_TIMER_EXPIRES value=180000 retries=0|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.536 |//SIP/SIPHandler/ccbId=0/scbId=0/sip_start_timer: type=SIP_TIMER_EXPIRES value=180000 retries=0|2,100,230,1.4901096^ISP-IP^*
    17:34:18.561 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::handle_input - handle = 334|*^*^*
    17:34:18.561 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::handle_input   Status: 0, Id: 2|*^*^*
    17:34:18.561 |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_UdpDataInd: Incoming SIP UDP message size 396 from ISP-IP:[5060]:
    [12623362,NET]
    SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden
    Call-ID: 16d82e80-2b11a45a-c43e7-84450d0a@MY-CUCM-IP
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    From: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>;tag=4052091~294be736-ce3b-450f-a7f1-c801f3cc9a7e-27746002
    To: <sip:2484XXX@ISP-IP>;tag=sip+1+b3a00013+867def6a
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP MY-CUCM-IP:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1003a84126249
    Server: CISCO-SBC/2.x
    Content-Length: 0
    Contact: <sip:ISP-IP:5060>
    [12623363,NET]
    ACK sip:2484XXX@ISP-IP:5060 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP MY-CUCM-IP:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1003a84126249
    From: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>;tag=4052091~294be736-ce3b-450f-a7f1-c801f3cc9a7e-27746002
    To: <sip:2484XXX@ISP-IP>;tag=sip+1+b3a00013+867def6a
    Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:34:18 GMT
    Call-ID: 16d82e80-2b11a45a-c43e7-84450d0a@MY-CUCM-IP
    Max-Forwards: 70
    CSeq: 101 ACK
    Allow-Events: presence
    Content-Length: 0
    INVITE sip:2484XXX@ISP's-Other-IP:5062 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP MY-CUCM-IP:5062;branch=z9hG4bK1003a95b8f3900
    From: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>;tag=4052092~294be736-ce3b-450f-a7f1-c801f3cc9a7e-27746002
    To: <sip:2484XXX@ISP's-Other-IP>
    Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:34:18 GMT
    Call-ID: 16d82e80-2b11a45a-c43e8-84450d0a@MY-CUCM-IP
    Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces
    Min-SE:  1800
    User-Agent: Cisco-CUCM8.6
    Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    Expires: 180
    Allow-Events: presence
    Supported: X-cisco-srtp-fallback
    Supported: Geolocation
    Cisco-Guid: 0383266432-0000065536-0000191816-2219117834
    Session-Expires:  1800
    P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>
    Remote-Party-ID: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
    Contact: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP:5062>
    Max-Forwards: 68
    Content-Type: application/sdp
    Content-Length: 215
    v=0
    o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 4052092 1 IN IP4 MY-CUCM-IP
    s=SIP Call
    c=IN IP4 MY-CUCM-IP
    t=0 0
    m=audio 29792 RTP/AVP 8 101
    a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
    a=ptime:20
    a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
    a=fmtp:101 0-15
    |2,100,56,1.173711431^MY-CUCM-IP^MTP_3
    17:34:18.567 |EnvProcessUdpPort - EnvProcessUdpHandler::fireSignal() varId = 0|2,100,56,1.173711431^MY-CUCM-IP^MTP_3
    17:34:18.567 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::fireSignal - SEND: index = 0, handler = 0xa6b4d7c0|*^*^*
    17:34:18.567 |EnvProcessUdpPort::fireSignal - SEND, destination = ISP's-Other-IP:5062|*^*^*
    17:34:18.567 |EnvProcessUdpPort - EnvProcessUdpHandler::send(buff, 1177, ISP's-Other-IP:5062)|*^*^*
    17:34:18.569 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::handle_input - handle = 335|*^*^*
    17:34:18.569 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::handle_input   Status: 0, Id: 0|*^*^*
    17:34:18.569 |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_UdpDataInd: Incoming SIP UDP message size 394 from ISP's-Other-IP:[5062]:
    [12623365,NET]
    SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP MY-CUCM-IP:5062;branch=z9hG4bK1003a95b8f3900;rport=5062
    From: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>;tag=4052092~294be736-ce3b-450f-a7f1-c801f3cc9a7e-27746002
    To: <sip:2484XXX@ISP's-Other-IP>
    Call-ID: 16d82e80-2b11a45a-c43e8-84450d0a@MY-CUCM-IP
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    Server: kamailio (3.3.1 (x86_64/linux))
    Content-Length: 0
    17:34:18.587 |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_UdpDataInd: Incoming SIP UDP message size 375 from ISP's-Other-IP:[5062]:
    [12623366,NET]
    SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP MY-CUCM-IP:5062;branch=z9hG4bK1003a95b8f3900;rport=5062
    Call-ID: 16d82e80-2b11a45a-c43e8-84450d0a@MY-CUCM-IP
    From: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>;tag=4052092~294be736-ce3b-450f-a7f1-c801f3cc9a7e-27746002
    To: <sip:2484XXX@ISP's-Other-IP>;tag=dc6a4ae7
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    Reason: Q.850;cause=0;text="unknown"
    Content-Length: 0
    |2,100,230,1.4901099^ISP's-Other-IP^*
    [12623367,NET]
    ACK sip:2484XXX@ISP's-Other-IP:5062 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP MY-CUCM-IP:5062;branch=z9hG4bK1003a95b8f3900
    From: <sip:057729XXXX@MY-CUCM-IP>;tag=4052092~294be736-ce3b-450f-a7f1-c801f3cc9a7e-27746002
    To: <sip:2484XXX@ISP's-Other-IP>;tag=dc6a4ae7
    Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:34:18 GMT
    Call-ID: 16d82e80-2b11a45a-c43e8-84450d0a@MY-CUCM-IP
    Max-Forwards: 70
    CSeq: 101 ACK
    Allow-Events: presence
    Content-Length: 0

    SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden error
    If your router is sending a SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden error to the SIP server you are registered to, there is a good chance your  router is blocking the incoming call due to the toll-faud prevention  feature that was added to IOS version 15.1(2)T.
    How to Identify if TOLLFRAUD_APP is Blocking Your Call
    If the TOLLFRAUD_APP is rejecting the call, it generates a Q.850       disconnect cause value of 21, which represents ‘Call Rejected’. The       debug voip ccapi inout command can be run to       identify the cause value.
    Additionally, voice iec syslog can be       enabled to further verify if the call failure is a result of the toll-fraud       prevention. This configuration, which is often handy to troubleshoot the origin       of failure from a gateway perspective, will print out that the call is being       rejected due to toll call fraud. The CCAPI and Voice IEC output is demonstrated       in this debug output:
    %VOICE_IEC-3-GW: Application Framework Core: Internal Error (Toll fraud call rejected):
    IEC=1.1.228.3.31.0 on callID 3 GUID=F146D6B0539C11DF800CA596C4C2D7EF
    000183: *Apr 30 14:38:57.251: //3/F146D6B0800C/CCAPI/ccCallSetContext:
       Context=0x49EC9978
    000184: *Apr 30 14:38:57.251: //3/F146D6B0800C/CCAPI/cc_process_call_setup_ind:
       >>>>CCAPI handed cid 3 with tag 1002 to app "_ManagedAppProcess_TOLLFRAUD_APP"
    000185: *Apr 30 14:38:57.251: //3/F146D6B0800C/CCAPI/ccCallDisconnect:
       Cause Value=21, Tag=0x0, Call Entry(Previous Disconnect Cause=0, Disconnect Cause=0)
    The Q.850 disconnect value that is returned for blocked calls can also       be changed from the default of 21 with this command:
    voice service voip
    ip address trusted call-block cause
    How to Return to Pre-15.1(2)T Behavior
    Source IP Address Trust List
    There are three ways to return to the previous behavior of voice       gateways before this trusted address toll-fraud prevention feature was       implemented. All of these configurations require that you are already running       15.1(2)T in order for you to make the configuration change.
    Explicitly enable those source IP addresses from which you would like           to add to the trusted list for legitimate VoIP calls. Up to 100 entries can be           defined. This below configuration accepts calls from those host           203.0.113.100/32, as well as from the network 192.0.2.0/24. Call setups from           all other hosts are rejected. This is the recommended method from a voice           security perspective.
    voice service voip
    ip address trusted list
      ipv4 203.0.113.100 255.255.255.255
      ipv4 192.0.2.0 255.255.255.0
    Configure the router to accept incoming call setups from all source           IP addresses.
    voice service voip
    ip address trusted list
      ipv4 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    Disable the toll-fraud prevention application completely.
    voice service voip
    no ip address trusted authenticate
    Two-Stage Dialing
    If two-stage dialing is required, the following can be configured to       return behavior to match previous releases.
    For inbound ISDN calls:
    voice service pots
    no direct-inward-dial isdn
    For inbound FXO calls:
    voice-port
    secondary dialtone

  • Calls from cucm to CME not working-unknown number

    hi all
    we have cucm 9.1 and gateway 2911 on the side A and on the side B we have uc540 , we have configured tunnels between 2911 and uc540, calls from cucm SideA to uc540 Side B is ok and working fine. now we have one 9951 phone which gets ip from uc540 (side B) and tftp is our cucm IP.9951 phone is registered in cucm and calls from cucm to that 9951 phones are working fine. now problem is call is one sided between uc 540 local extension and ip phone 9951.
    9951 which is registered on cucm can call uc 540 user  but spa 504 phone which is registered on uc540 cant call to cisco 9951 phone gets error "unknown number"
    i am attaching debug voice ccapi inout with this
    kidnly help me to solve the issue ASAP

    here is show voice register all.i am surprised to see dial peer 20002 but there is no dial peer like that i dont know where its getting this dial peer 20002.extension 2002 is registered with my call manager.
    Router#sh voice register all
    VOICE REGISTER GLOBAL
    =====================
    CONFIG [Version=8.6]
    ========================
      Version 8.6
      Mode is srst
      Max-pool is 0
      Max-dn is 0
      Outbound-proxy is enabled and will use global configured value
      Security Policy: DEVICE-DEFAULT
      Forced Authorization Code Refer is enabled
      timeout interdigit 0
      network-locale[0] US    (This is the default network locale for this box)
      network-locale[1] US
      network-locale[2] US
      network-locale[3] US
      network-locale[4] US
      user-locale[0] US    (This is the default user locale for this box)
      user-locale[1] US
      user-locale[2] US
      user-locale[3] US
      user-locale[4] US   Active registrations  : 0
      Total SIP phones registered: 0
      Total Registration Statistics
        Registration requests  : 0
        Registration success   : 0
        Registration failed    : 0
        unRegister requests    : 0
        unRegister success     : 0
        unRegister failed      : 0
        Attempts to register
               after last unregister : 0
        Last register request time   :
        Last unregister request time :
        Register success time        :
        Unregister success time      :
    VOICE REGISTER DN
    =================
    VOICE REGISTER POOL
    ===================
    Router#

  • CUCM to CVP calls. CTI-RP vs Route Pattern

    CVP 9 or above
    CUCM 9 or above
    Requirement:
    1. Consultive Warm Transfer - The agents to be able to transfer calls to a a different department by dialing an internal number and wait in the queue until answered.
    2. Internal - Back-office people to dial internal IT-Helpdesk or HR
    I see the above call flows as same, i.e. a Call Originating from CUCM to CVP .... correct me please?
    I have tested both and they both work exactly the same way, i.e. using a CTI-RP associated to PGUSER, ICM answers it sends correlation id to CUCM and CUCM sends this to CVP ...AND... using a simple route patters instead point to CUCM-CVP SIP trunk. Functionally they behave same way - ICM/CVP answers and queues call until answered.
    But the documentation confuses me, below snippet from CVP Config Guide
    "... Calls Originated by Unified CM
    Internal Help Desk calls: For these calls, the Unified Communication Manager (CM) phone user calls a CTI Route Point
    Consultative Warm Transfer: For these calls, a Unified CM agent places the caller on hold and dials in to Unified ICME to reach a second agent .... "
    And then on the same doc, there a Note
    (*1) Note For warm transfers, the call from Agent 1 to Agent 2 does not typically use a SIP Trunk, but you must configure the CTI Route Point for that dialed number on the Unified CM server and associate that number with your peripheral gateway user (PGUSER)
    (*2) And then again on the same doc under 'Unified ICME Warm Consult Transfer/Conference to Unified CVP' chapter/section it mentiones doing this using a Route Patter 'Create a route pattern and assign the route list to the route pattern'
    So the confusion is
    1. Why treat these call flows as Internal and Warm Transfer - they are calls from CUCM to CVP for the same end result - queue the call and transfer to an agent?
    2. Route pattern or CTI-RP, what diff it makes? They both behave the same way, so is there a diff from reporting point of view that a call to CTI-RP are treated as Transferred rather than new calls or what?
    3. Also if you compare (*1) & (*2) above, they both talk about Warm Transfer and *1 says 'must use CTI-RP' and *2 says use a Route Pattern?
    Please assist.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kartik

    Kartik,
    The Route Pattern that is mentioned is used for connecting a call leg through CVP to a local VXML Gateway for media playback. The CTI Route Point is entirely different from the Route Pattern/Route List setup. Here's the basic call flow:
    Internal caller dials DN
    DN hits CTI RP in CUCM. CTI RP sends call to ICM.
    ICM matches DN to Call Type to Script, executes Script.
    At some point, Script has either Send To VRU or a Run Ext. Script node.
    ICM sends CUCM Network VRU label back to CUCM.
    CUCM routes label using Route Pattern and Route List. The CSS of the internal caller determines how this is modified, i.e. which prefix digits to add for determining VXML gateway to route to.
    Call is sent to CVP through SIP trunk
    CVP receives call, tells ICM it has the call.
    CVP starts new call leg to VXML gateway with digit string to match bootstrap dial-peer.
    VXML Gateway receives call, initiates bootstrap TCL and VXML magic.
    Yes, this is basically the same call flow for a fresh internal call to a queue, or an internal warm transfer to a queue. The CTI Route Point is needed in both cases. The Route Pattern/Route List combo is needed in both cases.
    When you start looking at reporting, yes of course the two call scenarios are different. One is a transfer, the other isn't. The transferred call will have a more complex call history if you look at it in the TCDR.
    From the standpoint of call legs, you will use less legs if you do a direct (one-step) transfer instead of a warm transfer. It is also simpler to maintain the call context in that case. In a warm transfer scenario, the agent is putting a caller on hold, then starting a new call, and joining the two calls together. The new call is coming from the agent, not the original caller. In a direct transfer, CVP just takes back the original call, potentially does more queuing, then sends the original caller to a new agent target.
    -Jameson

  • I can call from Branch through Gatekeeper to CUCM. But cannot call from CUCM through Gatekeeper to any Branche.

    Hello All,
    I can Call from any Branch office to CUCM through Gatekeeper. But I cannot call from CUCM through Gatekeeper to any Branch.
    My CUCM version is 9.1.2
    Regards
    Bahlul

    Do you see anything shw up on the debugs on the branch router?
    Check debug h225 asn1 to see if there is a setup coming from the CUCM. If not, that means the CUCM is not receiving the IP address of the branch gateway from the GK. This could mean a config issue on the GK with respect to the branch gateways, or on the UCM.
    Take debug gatekeeper main 10 from the gatekeeper. These debugs will show what's happening on the GK while processing the incoming ARQ from CUCM.
    Also please upload the config of the GK, branch gateway here.
    Hantale
    Sree

  • Use Cisco CUCM for outbound "call me at" feature on Lync meetings

    I'm trying to find a step by step to enable users (non enterprise voice users) to use the dial me at feature in Lync conference meetings. I only want the user to have the ability to tell Lync to dial a number to place that number into the conference call,
    the feature is easy to enable but i can't get the routing right between CUCM and Lync. I've looked all around the net but I can't seem to find anything that matches what i'm trying to do, other docs cover enterprise voice and that's out of my scope. Any assistance
    here would be nice. Thanks

    Hi,
    In Lync Server 2010, it is not supported with “call me at” function for non-Enterprise Voice users.
    However, Lync Server 2013 now allows participants that are not Enterprise Voice enabled to initiate dial-out calls from a meeting conference, called “Dial-out Conferencing for non-Enterprise Voice users”.
    This can be configured by setting the Conferencing policy to allow this feature (Set-CSConferencingPolicy –AllowNonEnterpriseVoiceUsersToDialOut:$true). After enabling this, then assign a voice policy to the users who need the function.
    Best Regards,
    Eason Huang
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Eason Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Unity Connection transferring calls to CUCM

    I have posted here before, continuing my learning in my lab.
    CUCM 9 and CUC 9.  4 IP Phones registered and all have mailboxes.  I have a System Call Handler configured to answer calls coming from a CTI Route Point.
    I have been playing with a scenario trying to learn all the capabilities of the various call handlers.
    Im currently trying to allow the caller to transfer to a phone number that is registered in CUCM - but does NOT have a mailbox.
    My CUC Configuration
         Call Handler Basics
              Callers Hear -> My Personal Recording
              During Greeting -> Allow Transfers to Numbers Not Associate with Users or Call Handlers
              After Greeting -> Conversation -> Caller System Transfer
         System Settings -> Restriction Tables
              Default Transfer
                   I added a new entry and specifically entered the DN that I was trying to transfer to (123)
                   I unchecked the "blocked" for all entries
         Call Management -> Call Routing -> Forwarded Routing Rules
                   Attempt Forward Routing Rule -> Send Call to -> Conversation -> Attempt Forward
    From an IP Phone, I dial the CTI RP and get forwarded to the main / opening call handler.  I traverse a couple of menu tree levels to get to my call handler where I am attempting to transfer back to CUCM.  I hear my recorded personal greeting instructing me to enter my number.  Whether I wait for the recording to end or whether I enter the digits during the greeting, the results are the same.  The result is that nothing happens.  No recorded message telling me that I cant be transferred to that number - nothing at all.  The call just terminates.
    I started up Connection Remote Port Status monitor and I can watch the sequence of the call.  When I enter the digits of the target phone (123), I see in the Remote Port Status Monitor that it sees and receives the DTMF digits, but then nothing happens. 
    I next tested by adding a test user in CUC with the same DN of 123.  As soon as I did that, I repeated the attempted call and when I dialed "123", I get the recorded message "Wait while I transfer that call" and then the call completes successfully.
    This is my home lab so I can make any changes that you suggest with no user implications.
    Jeff

    Hi Jeff,
    That is weird! It is still shown in this 9.x doc
    Overview of Default Restriction Tables in Cisco Unity
    Connection 9.x
    Default Fax
    Restricts numbers for fax delivery.
    Default Outdial
    Restricts numbers for message notifications
    Default System Transfer
    Restricts numbers that can be used for
    Caller system transfers, which allow
    unidentified callers to transfer to a
    number that they specify. For example,
    callers may want to dial a lobby or conference room phone that is not
    associated with a Connection user. By default, the table does not allow
    Connection to dial any numbers.
    Default Transfer
    Restricts numbers for call transfers.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/9x/administration/guide/9xcucsagx/9xcucsag110.pdf
    Cheers!
    Rob
    "May your heart always be joyful
    And may your song always be sung
    May you stay forever young " 
    - Dylan

  • Silent monitoring calls with CUCM 6.0 and UCCX 5.0

    Dear all,
    We have just integrated a 3rd party recording solution in our VoIP system, which consists of CUCM 6.0 and UCCX 5.0.
    Until now we used the recording and monitoring solution of the UCCX for the agents. This worked ok.
    But, as we wanted to record other people's calls and also the outgoing calls of the agents, we have created for them a Recording profile in the CCM and assign it to the agents phone.
    We have also mantained the recording and monitoring active for them in the UCCX.
    What is happenning now is the following:
    - The 3rd party recordings works perfectly.
    - The recording in the UCCX gets only one way audio.
    - The silent monitoring gets only one way audio.
    - If the 3rd party recording server is stopped, but the recording profile is stil active in the phones, the silent monitoring in the UCCX works.
    Could any of you confirm if using a 3rd party recording solution the monitoring still works?
    Is there any 3rd party silent monitoring software?
    Thanks in advcance.
    Best regards,
    Amaia

    We've got to delimit the problem.
    When we use 3rd party recording solution there are 4 RTP flows: 1 incoming to monitored/recorded phone and 3 flows outgoing.
    1 incoming RTP flows
    - voice of remote phone
    3 outgoing RTP flows
    - voice of monitored/recorded phone
    - voice of monitored/recorded phone sent to 3d party recording server
    - voice of remote phone sent to 3rd party recording server
    When we use a network analyzer we see that the agent running in the PC (UCCX 5.0) establishes two RTP flows for the monitoring session. But we can see that one of these flows sends 3 packet RTP per 1 packet RTP sent in the other RTP flow (in the same time).
    We think agent sends to monitoring device all the outoing RTP packets of the phone (that belong to three different RTP flows), instead of sending only the RTP packets belonging to voice of monitored/recorded phone.
    The other flow, voice of remote phone, sounds fine.
    Is there a solution to avoid this problem when we monitor with UCCX 5.0 and record with a 3rd party software at the same time?
    Thanks,
    Christian

  • Why are my current calls being interrupted by new calls?

    Why are my current calls being interrupted by new calls?
    I'm using iPhone 6 plus and reset my network settings multiple times. The issue is random.

    glic1 wrote:
    Why are my current calls being interrupted by new calls?
    I'm using iPhone 6 plus and reset my network settings multiple times. The issue is random.
    Are you saying when your on a phone call and someone else calls you it does what exactly?  Disconnect your current call with the new call?

  • My iphone 4S has problem in making and receiving the calls. While making the call , call fails and netwrok disappears. Like wise no voice is heard for incoming calls. This happened after return from the overseas travel.

    My iphone 4S has problem in making and receiving the calls. While making the call , call fails and netwrok disappears. Like wise no voice is heard for incoming calls. This happened after return from the overseas travel.

    Hello SamSax
    Check out the assist page below for troubleshooting call connectivity.
    Calls and connection issues
    http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/assistant/calls/
    Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
    Regards,
    -Norm G.

  • My speaker on my iPhone 4s stopped working. I can't hear my phone ringing, music, apps or use the speaker when having a call.  I can still make and take calls when I see them calling but can't hear the phone ring.

    This afternoon my speaker on my phone stopped working. I can not hear it ringing when someone call, but if I see someone calling and I answer the call they can hear me and I can hear them fine. I also can't not put the caller on speaker at all , I also can't hear my music or gaming apps. When I turn my phone on or off it does not make a sound as well. I have turned the phone off and turned it off by pressing the top button and home button at the same time and that did not work. I checked the volume and the mute button and the volume is up all the way. I don't know what else to do can you please help me?

    I have had this happen to me on 3GS, 4 and 4s.   Usually the solution is one of the following:
    1-  If  your volume indicator says  headphones even though they are not plugged in, then:
    Stick your headphones into the headphone jack and then remove quickly.
    2. If that does not work Power your phone off. Then when restarting Reset the phone by pressing the home button and the power button at the same time until the apple logo appears.
    3. Make sure you have not chosen to send audio to an Airplay device such as Apple Tv.
    Hope one of these works for you

  • I got problem when trying to contact my iphone 4 using facetime,it did ringing,but my iphone 4 did not receive that call as if nothing happen.But,when the call ended,that call appeared in the missed call list.fyi both are connected to internet.

    i got problem when trying to call my iphone 4 using facetime with my Macbook Pro 13',it did ringing,but my iphone 4 did not receive that call as if nothing happen.But,when the call ended,that call appeared in the missed call list.fyi both are connected to internet.Help!! thank you in advance

    i got problem when trying to call my iphone 4 using facetime with my Macbook Pro 13',it did ringing,but my iphone 4 did not receive that call as if nothing happen.But,when the call ended,that call appeared in the missed call list.fyi both are connected to internet.Help!! thank you in advance

  • Since you don't allow emails any more – I suspect because of the numerous complaints with your service and the way you treat people that you don't want documented, I am calling and I want this call recorded for future reference. I have been a long time fa

    Since you don’t allow emails any more – I suspect because of the numerous complaints with your service and the way you treat people that you don’t want documented, I am calling and I want this call recorded for future reference.
    I have been a long time faithful customer of vzw and although the past year I have been late on payments many times and really couldn’t afford your exorbitant prices for services lots of other companies offer sometimes three times cheaper than what you charge, I have hung in there trying my best to meet my obligations.
    This month has been no exception. You don’t know the background; the whole story of people’s lives. I know you could care less because all you care about is the profit-the money that comes in.
    I was told when I agreed to pay my bill on the third per the recorded message that I had 14 days to pay…you cut me off anyway. The phones are not the tissue; your suspending my service means I cannot work. I may lose my job…how do you justify that? In any case? The least you could do would be to keep 4986 on and cut the phones off. But no. You refuse to compromise and meet the basic needs of your customer. What does that say about your company? I tried to call back on three separate occasions to tell you I couldn’t pay because of unexpected expenses but couldn’t get out of the automated system…sadly couldn’t get to a real person which also speaks volumes to me.
    All this tells me this is a company I don’t wish to be affiliated with any more. As soon as I can, I will discontinue service with you…I know you could care less. I will honor the remaining portion of the contract but that’s it. You don’t deserve my business. I am a good, hardworking person who, at the sacrifice of myself and my needs, always pays her bills…albeit late at times. I realize others tell you stories and lies to justify themselves. That’s not me. If you knew what I had been through the last 7 yrs you would marvel that I am  still on my feet…don’t judge too quickly. You could be wrong…and in my eyes you are by doing this to me.
    God will see us through this extremely scary time of that I have no doubt. No thanks to your company and lack of understanding and mercy. I am doing the best I can. Sadly you are not.
    See I have choices. MANY choices of providers for services you offer. I don’t have to be treated like this. I don’t have to succumb to your coldness and callousness. I intend to choose better (and cheaper). If your company doesn’t get the “people factor” back you will be sorry.

    Problem here is you admit you cannot afford the service.
    And you want to blame Verizon for losing a job because you have no cell phone.
    If your job depends on that phone I would pay it on time every time if you need a job to pay your bill.
    No other service is going to treat you any different. And if you cannot afford Verizon's monthly invoice how are you going to afford new devices, activation fees, possible security deposits on any other cellular carrier? You can't.
    Also if you made an arraignment to pay and then decide you cannot do so, why should Verizon extend you service or credit, or why is it you want to use the service and data and not pay for it as agreed.
    Get a prepay phone. Its evident the cost is too high for you to afford on post pay.
    Good Luck

  • The call was cancelled by the caller before the remote party answered

    Hi,
    We have a Lync 2010 Enterprise deployment in a single site with 2 FE and Mediation Server collocated.
    When dialling a number from a PSTN phone the call gets routed via our PBX/PBX Gateway/Mediation Server/FE Server to the desktop Lync client successfully.
    As soon as the user answers the call with the Lync client the call 'hangs' and terminates without hearing anything on either side.
    The snooper logs show:
    Error:
    SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated
    Partial Content:
    User-Agent: UCCAPI/4.0.7577.4398 OC/4.0.7577.4398 (Microsoft Lync 2010)
    Ms-client-diagnostics: 52092;reason="The call was cancelled by the caller before the remote party answered"
    Content-Length: 0
    Please help?
    Vinkie

    What kind of gateway are you using to connect to your PBX and how?  What is your media set to?  G.711 μ-law or a-law?  I'd check media settings there as a starting point. 
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".

  • I am recieving calls from a solicitor. Show up as no caller Id. I want to block all calls that do not show caller Id. Can I do that? I am on the do not call list

    How do I block all in coming calls that do not show on my caller Id. Phone says "no caller id" This particular call is from a place selling septic tank cleaner. They leave an automated voice mail. They are calling me over and over. I am on the national do not call list but that's no help. Because the caller id doesn't show anything I can't even report them.
    I remember in the past calling a number and before my call would go thru I would have to enter my phone number so the party I was calling knew who was calling them. That is what I want to do. I want to block all calls from "no caller id" "number unavailable" Just FYI my phone is an IPHONE 5 and I am on Verizon.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks

        itbitybob, good day!
    Thank you for taking the time to reach out to us today. I know how frustrating it can be getting phone calls from "no caller id" numbers. We do have an option that is called Family Base that will allow you to block unknown numbers, private numbers, or caller id. This link will provide you with the full details of this option. http://vz.to/1gIklla I hope this is able to answer your question. If you have further questions please feel free to reach back out to us at any time.
    KevinR_VZW
    Please follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport 

Maybe you are looking for