Average Response Time for Reports

Hi Gurus,
I am using OAS 10.1.2.0.2 with Business Intelligence and Forms Installation.
Previously I have never seen Average Response Time of Reports server greater than 10000(ms),
But It is increasing continously and now within 2-3 days it has increased upto 114668(ms)
CPU Usage (%)          N/A
     Memory Usage (MB)          N/A
     Average Response Time (ms)          114668
its Maximum queue size is 1000....
I am not able to find out why it is increasing in this manner.....
plz help..
Thanx

Hi,
Today it has been increased upto 170236 ...
Thanx,
Santosh

Similar Messages

ISA Server 2006 + Average response time for Non Cached requests = performance issues?!?!?!

All,
I am in a predicament with internet browsing speeds...We have a 3rd party look after our line and internet facing f/w so I cant troubleshoot them, so at the moment Im looking at ISA as the potential bottleneck - we have a fairly standard environment:
Internal > Local Host > Perimiter n/work > Firewall > Internet
I have been running custom reports on the ISA server to see what data can be collected - I have noticed that "Average response time for non cached requests" (traffic by time of day) can be as high as 76 seconds!!!!!! Cached hits are between .5
and 2 seconds.
I have also coonfigured a connectivity verifier which is also flagging slow connectivity, massively over the >5000ms and also reporting "cant resolve server name on occassions- and this is configured for
www.Microsoft.com --- DNS ???!?!, however I have looked through DNS (no obvious errors / config issues) which I can see
I have run the BPA on ISA server to ensure its Health - - connectivity verifier errors flagged timeouts to microsoft.com as expected...
Can anyone advise any obvious areas to investigate as Im struggling! - as always the 3rd party have told us the internet pipe is fine :O

Problem resolved.
DNS forwarders have been changed on the ISA server / DNS and this has improved lookup speed considerably.
thanks all :)

Average Response Times for a Reports Server

On Application Server Control and Grid Control are sections listing the Average Response Time in milliseconds.
Can anyone tell me what response it is measuring exactly?
Thanks
Andy

See the Online Help for the page for a description of the metric. In Help, you can search for "metric" to see definitions of the other metrics.

Average response times for VA01 and VA02 transactions

Hi,
we have some users complaining about response times, more specific for VA01 and VA02 transactions. We would like to compare our average response times to those of other companies in order to get an idea of what is acceptable to most companies. If you are willing to contribute, can you please send a few hours of STAD data (only for VA01 and VA02 transactions) of an average working day? Perhaps you can download the data into a spreadsheet and mail the zipped file to my account Many thanks.
Best regards,
Guido Van Leuven

Hi,
This is not the issue. We are investigating everything possible to improve our response times and we believe that that these are ok as well. We just want to build a case where we can prove that our response times are not worse than those at other companies and that we can do only by comparing those statistics.
Best regards,
Guido Van Leuven

ASM & Average Response Time

Greetings All, I was hoping that others may have some insight into DB Control and how is reports ASM Disk response times.
First my environment:
Oracle RAC 11g R1 Standard Edition, Patchset 12
Two Node Cluster
Windows x64 2003 R2 DataCenter Edition.
I am leveraging DB Control to monitor the ASM instances along with the db instances. My issue is regarding how db control gathers metrics to report on average response time for the DISKS that make up the Disk Group.
I have two issues:
1.) The overall response time reported in db control for my disk group "DATA" does not jive with the average I calculate based on the numbers being reported by db control. E.g.) I have ten LUNS in my DATA disk group and if I calculate the mean avg response time from each individual disk as reported by db control I don't get the same number being reported by db control. The numbers differ by as much as 20%.
2.) The numbers reported by ASM for avg response time for each LUN in the disk group are not the same from disk to disk. E.g.) In my current production environment here are the Avg Response Times for each LUN in the group:
8.73, 11.38, 5.22, 4.13, 3.04, 15.84, 12.71, 12.91, 10.51, 9.25.
I would have expected that these disks would have had the same avg response time because ASM is working to guarantee that each disk has the same number of I/O's.
The disk array has identical disks for all 10.
Further, the average for all disks as being reported by db control is : 7.28.
If I do the math I get an average of 9.38, the % diff between these two numbers is 28%
I have heard that db control does a poor job of reporting on ASM disk metrics but this is just people grumbling. I was hoping that someone out there may have some solid facts regarding db control and ASM.

hey....
maybe its be better off to open a generel discussion task on metalink....
*T

Report to calculate avg response time for a transaction using ST03.

Hi Abap Gurus ,
I want to develop a report which calculates the average response time(ST 03) for a transaction on hourly basis.
I have read many threads like in which users are posting which tables/FM to use to extract data such as dialog step and total response time .
I am sure many would have created a report like this , would appeciate if you can share pseudo code for same.Any help regarding the same is highly appreciated...
Cheers,
Karan

http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/

Can Cisco Historical Reports Report Average Hold Time for Incoming Calls?

Is the a way that Cisco Historical can report on the Average Hold Time for Incoming Calls? User is trying to figure out if there is a hold time prior to the agent picking up the call.
I am running CRS Historical Reports Versions 5.0 (2.5).

Hi,
You can check the link belowCisco Unified Contact Center Express 5.0 Historical Reporting Administrator and Developer Guide:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_5_0/programming/hr_admin_devp/crs501hd.pdf
this document includes all the details regarding the reports and its cutomization.
Regards,
Trad

Average Response Time ASM

Hi,
Installed 10g RAC SE on Enterprise Linux 64. We have two ASM instances with 2 disk groups DATA and FRA. Database Control reports for disk group DATA (that consists of 3 RAID 5 vol.) that Average Response Time is 54-58 ms. Read Response Time is around 40-45ms. Everything is done to Oracle recommendations with a large stripe size and so on. We don't have performance problem but should not the response time be better? Can someone else share response time values for comparison?
Regards Lars

Grid Control always has been notoriously bad at measuring I/O performance of ASM, sadly. The service time numbers are usually high, and the IOPs numbers often are not IOPs so much as "I/Os to date with periodic resets to zero" numbers.
As the previous poster said, use iostat. On Linux, iostat -x, the svctm column.

"Windows 8 using 100% of HDD with high average response times and low read/write speed"

Turns out this is a fairly well known windows 8.1 issue that has been plaguing users since at least 2013 and there is no one simple fix, so it may not be *entirely* hp's fault; but I've had two of these laptops, both the same model, the first one needing to be returned and exchanged for an entirely unrelated issue (hardware failure: ethernet port nonfunctional with lights stuck on). Both are refurbished. Both have been extreemly slow and unresponsive even compared to a lesser Brazos powered laptop I had before, but I've only recently decided to investigate why.
So if there is something HP specific going on here, I hope there is one simple fix. My average response time has gone up as far as well over a minute (>60,000ms), so I may be an outlier case here compared to the typical windows 8.1 hardrive responsiveness/bandwidth problem.
Edit: there is a case with another HP pavilion laptop (intel powered though, so it may be an intel storage driver issue described in the first link) being much, much worse.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Guess what just now happened again
So using DISM did _not_ fix it.

High Avg Response time for logon requests via CMS

Hi Team ,
We are continuously receiving observing high Average reponse time for logon requests to the BO system via Central Management Server.
We observe response time up to 25043 ms .
Currently we are on SAP BO 4.0 SP7 patch 9 (4.0.7.9)
DB = SQL server 2008 R2
App Server = SAP NW 7.31 SP 7.
Also the size of our CMS DB is around 15 GB .
What could be the possible reasons ?
Regards ,
Abhinav

Hi Abhinav,
As one of the issues has been raised as a bug which is resolved in BI 4.1 so you can upgrade to resolve this bug. Also if the CMS database size is large then CMS has to search for objects through huge number of rows hence that will affect overall performance. So you can try to reduce this size as per my previous upate.
Apart this you can try following steps
Try to ping CMS DB server from BO servers and confirm the response is coming in 1 ms. Run tracert <DB servers name> from CMD and check the number of hops. If response time is not 1 ms or there are more number of hops then ask your network team to resolve network latency issue
You can increase the "System database connections" for each CMS from server properties. It is set to 14 by default which means the CMS will establish 14 connections to CMS database at any time. You can increase this value, however please make sure that the system database allows more connections than default 14 from DB side. This needs to be confirmed from your DBA.
Please add CMS cluster members in platformservices.properties file under Tomcat folder. Please refer following SAP KBA for steps to add the cluster members
       http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1668515
       http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1766935
   4. Also please confirm number of users simultaneously login to system at peak time. Usually one           CMS is capable of handling around 500 requests. So if you have more then 1000 users then add           another new CMS on same nodes if there is enough free memory on the server
Regards,
Hrishikesh

What %of Avg Response time for Avg DB Time is known as Good Perfformance ?

If my average response 875 mili seconds - what %of DB Time is accepted as best perofrmance.
could any one give bench marks for Best peforming ABAP (R/3) System>
Rgds
PR

Hey,
In general, normal performance should have
60% DB and 40% appl, however, those performance are right for ECC/R3, if you are using other system, this is not relevant, for example XI, might have 80%DB and only 20% appl.
it looks like your system is not having performance problems,
due to the fact that you have 875 mili sec average response time.

SLR - transaction response time for all appl. servers together

Hi,
we want to have in SLR response time for defined transaction. We have activated necessary steps for monitoring transactions, started CPH and we can see in SLR average response times.
We have several application servers and we want to have in SLR TOTAL response time for all appl. servers together.
Is it possible? What is necessary steps to do it?
Thanks for all hints.
Regards,
Roman

Hi Andreas,
Another way to approach this would be to use CCMS transaction monitoring by maintaining table ALTRAMONI (in the satellite system) as described here: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/b3/468e3b093d4031e10000000a11402f/content.htm
In RZ20 you'll be able to see the last 24 hours of performance data in a 1-hour granularity, as well as the last 30 minutes in a higher granularity. Depending on your requirements you can then configure alerting so that you get an email when performance passes a certain threshold.
Jon

ST03N Tcode not showing last 3 days average response time

Hi,
In my Production system not showing last 3 days average response time.In our production 1 (CI+DB) and 3 dialog instances are there. In all servers sapcollector working fine but in all servers not showing last 3 days values.Please advise solution.
Thanks,
Srinivas.

The following are the prerequisites needed to get the workload monitor(st03) working.
1)      The system time zone of the SAP and the Operating system has to be same. This can be done by customizing time zones of the SAP using the Tcode STZAC.
2)     All the standard background jobs has to be scheduled to run. This can be done by scheduling the standard background jobs using the Tcode SM36.
3)     The following parameters has to be added to the instance profile.
Parameter                                                  Value(default)                                                  Description
i.     stat/as_collect                                                          = 2                                          Application statistic: detailed records.
ii.     stat/as_level                                                              = 1                                          Records for application statistic are active.
iii.     stat/max_files                                                           = 48                                        Max. no. of stat files to be kept.
iv.     stat/as_max_files                                                    = 48                                        Max. no. of appl. stat files to be kept.
This can be done by editing the profiles using the Tcode RZ10.

Ping success rate against Average response time

Hi All,
I find this very weird, while I am pinging some host, and the host's Success Rate is for example below 40% while the average response time remains at around 5ms.Why Weird? Shouldn't it raise the Average response time if there were timeouts ( Success Rate ) on the proccess?
This is causing problems to me, because I have implemented a script which changes routing between two different ISP's based on Success rate and Average Response Time.
It compares both of the ISP's result to make the change, here is a piece of code which shows exactly what I want to do, maybe there's a better way to do it, if you have any ideas please share.
if {$srate_isp1 >= $srate_isp2 && $avrg_isp1 <= $avrg_isp2
:Make the change
else
Do nothing
The problem with this is, if Success rate is below 40% and is worse than Success rate of ISP2 , and the average time remains better for ISP1, it will not make the change.I was expecting average response time to raise if the success rate is bad, but sadly enough its not going to happen.
Btw, the script is in TCL, and I would share the whole script but its too long.If you need more bits of it, i'll share.
Thanks,
Uran

This happens when wifi device in your computer re-scans wifi networks in background.
To reproduce this, run ping to any host and then click on wifi icon to display list of available networks - and you will see ping lag.
This can be disabled in registry - search for ScanWhenAssociated parameter inside HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM and set it to 0 everywhere (typically 2 occurences). After it restart wifi driver or computer.

Bad response time for aRFC

On our R/3 ECC6 production system ,we have one aRFC call by external system,there are 200000 times per day.
and the response time for the RFC call is 35ms ,Some times its response time(commit time) are much longer and up to 2 seconds.
There is very simple code for the RFC as shown below
    insert ztable from table lt_internal_table.
    commit work
    call function 'function_name'
    starting new task 'N'.
    tables
       it_tab = lt_internal_table.
Regards,
ShiChunQing

Dear Randorlf ,
Now i can determine that statement "commit work"   have a high cost some times.
I write a simple report as show below,
One high cost will occurs per several minutes.
report ztest.
do 10 times.
    GET RUN TIME FIELD t1.
    INSERT ytest_table FROM TABLE lt_tab.
    GET RUN TIME FIELD t2.
    t1 = t2 - t1.
    WRITE:/ 'insert:',t1,sy-uzeit.
    COMMIT WORK.
    GET RUN TIME FIELD t3.
    t2 = t3 - t2.
    WRITE: 'commit:',t2,sy-uzeit.
enddo.
Run results:
insert:        879 16:23:02 commit:      1,713 16:23:02
insert:      1,607 16:23:05 commit:      4,434 16:23:05
insert:       1,265 16:23:08 commit:      3,790 16:23:08
insert:        648 16:23:11 commit:      1,195 16:23:11
insert:        659 16:23:14 commit: 390,208 16:23:15
insert:        640 16:23:18 commit:      1,032 16:23:18
Best regards
shichunqing

Average Response Time for Reports

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for