Avoid copies in .wlnotdelete?

Hi people
When you deploy an enterprise application into Weblogic 6.1, the whole application
is copied into applications\.wlnotdelete\wl_app49002.ear and into applications\.wlnotdelete\wlap25104\
in exploded format!
That means in our case, 150 MB are copied twice!
How can I avoid this copying?
The developers are working on NT with the enterprise application in exploded format.
The enterprise application is not under the WL directory tree, but it is registered
in the config.xml of the domain.
In production we may use ear format.
WL 6.1 sp 1.
Thanks a lot
Alex

Hi
Try to use a field counter of structure SAPSCRIPT:
Copy &SAPSCRIPT-COUNTER_0(+)&
The system should be add 1 to field counter when that command is running.
But I'm not sure if it work, because if the user choose the number of copies in the dialog (from fm OPEN_FORM), the system'll print the same document for copies number times.
I think you should call your sapscrpit for copies number times parameter:
DO COPIES TIMES.
CALL FUNCTION 'WRITE_FORM'
ENDDO.
Max

Similar Messages

  • Reverse itunes media folder reorganisation

    hello and HELP!
    i am a new mac user, and in wanting to import all my music into itunes and avoid copies being made in a separate itunes folder, in the advanced section of the preferences i changed the itunes media folder location to being my "my music" folder, un-checked "copy files to itunes media folder when adding to library", and checked "keep itunes media folder organised" thinking it would just organise my music in itunes.
    however, to my great despair, itunes has re-arranged all my songs and re-named songs and folders in my "my music" folder, classing i don't know how many under "unknown", "various", etc...my great despair as i have 90GB of music which was perfectly organised by artist name and album and is now a big shambles.
    please someone tell me this re-organisation can be reversed? i've tried un-checking the "keep itunes folder organised" and re-starting itunes, but to no avail. i would greatly appreciate any advice at all.
    thanks so much
    chantal

    Welcome to AD!
    It's the same answer for both Mac and Windows.
    Sadly, that organization can't be undone. If only you had left the "copy files..." checked as well, you could go back to the originals.
    Perfect time for an UNDO button, but there isn't one.

  • Itunes media folder reorganisation

    hello and HELP!
    i am a new mac user, and in wanting to import all my music into itunes and avoid copies being made in a separate itunes folder, in the advanced section of the preferences i changed the itunes media folder location to being my "my music" folder, un-checked "copy files to itunes media folder when adding to library", and checked "keep itunes media folder organised" thinking it would just organise my music in itunes.
    however, to my great despair, itunes has re-arranged all my songs and re-named songs and folders in my "my music" folder, classing i don't know how many under "unknown", "various", etc...my great despair as i have 90GB of music which was perfectly organised by artist name and album and is now a big shambles.
    please someone tell me this re-organisation can be reversed? i've tried un-checking the "keep itunes folder organised" and re-starting itunes, but to no avail. i would greatly appreciate any advice at all.
    thanks so much
    chantal

    Welcome to AD!
    It's the same answer for both Mac and Windows.
    Sadly, that organization can't be undone. If only you had left the "copy files..." checked as well, you could go back to the originals...

  • I3 os4 - i4s os5 Albums gone - Cam roll missing photos

    ITunes 10.5 pc
    THE StORY:
    3G phone-------------
    Spent hours sorting 4000 pics on 3G os4 ready for 4s os5 upgrade.
    - created 9 albums from pics on camera roll 
    - Noticed photo library gets larger as I do this.
    - on iPhone, manually delete photos in Cam Roll to avoid copies in 3 places (goal: Present only in Photo Library and Albums since these are linked by design. Who wants a bunch of dup pics, crikey. 1 less is still better right?
    - in iTunes, (based on genius direction) right click phone icon, create backup. (the theory was a snapshot of current phones state before upgrade to 4s)
    - synced phone - (had some app upgrades/pics to account for)
    Q?. How do I know if pics are getting backed up some place when doing a sync?
    4S-----------
    Goal - Put new data on new phone.
    - plug in 4S. Right click phone icon, restore from backup option. Select most recent date.
    - complete restore. Phone restarts. Run through setup. Complete. Use phone! Yay!
    PROBLEM:
    3G
    Cam roll 4251 pics
    Photo library 792 pics = 10 albums (that took hours to create)
    4S
    Camera Roll 4251 pics
    No Photo Library and no albums. @&$! Really?
    - did I just lose 792 of my favorite pics including 262 pics of my fiancé makin funny faces!?
    - lame. Please help.
    Q?. How do I retrieve all my pics w/o losing changes made to new 4s
    - FYI I can still see the albums and photo album on the old 3G phone. Afraid to hook it back up to iTunes in fear of losing them, did they. It get backed up some how?!!!

    I better summarize.
    ...old 3G iPhone.
    1. Created a backup of:
    Camera Roll 4251 pics
    Photo Library 792 pics consisting of 10 albums.
    New 4S
    1. Restored from backup.
    2. Result: Camera Roll 4251 pics
    No Photo Library and no albums. They went missing, how?!
    - did I just lose 792 of my most important pictures?
    Any insight appreciated.
    1. How do I get the albums from my old phone backed up if I ran the backup function before upgrade to 4s with apparently no luck?
    2. Additionally, if I could somehow get the pics backed up, how do get them onto my now already restored 4s where only a camera roll is present? 

  • Howto get rid of duplicates in iTunes but keep albums complete

    I try to get rid of duplicates in iTunes but came across the following problem:
    In File -> display duplicates tons of duplicates show up, but when I delete one file the entry is the itunes-library is deleted as well and I will miss this song in that specific album.
    Is there a solution to refer to 1 file on disk with multiple entries in my library, to keep my albums complete with the correct ID3-tags (meta-data) and get rid of duplicate files on disk. This would save me a lot of space on disk.
    Or is the correct way of avoiding copies of files in iTunes, to drag-in the file once and link with various album-playlists to it? Then you still missing the possibility of saving meta-data of those playlist-links, right?

    iTunes does not have the ability to show just one file in multiple albums. So you'll have to keep the multiple files for multiple albums.

  • Strange behavior of oracle database

    I have a instance in a db server and i access the databse from sqlplus through my client.today morning when I wanted to restart the database while opening the database it gave the following error.
    SQL> startup
    ORACLE instance started.
    Total System Global Area 272629760 bytes
    Fixed Size 1248504 bytes
    Variable Size 125829896 bytes
    Database Buffers 142606336 bytes
    Redo Buffers 2945024 bytes
    Database mounted.
    ORA-01172: recovery of thread 1 stuck at block 137 of file 2
    ORA-01151: use media recovery to recover block, restore backup if needed
    but when restarted it sitting on the server itself it got started up without complaining.
    What could be the culprit for this strange behavior of the database??

    Hi,
    This problem normally occures when block corruption happens.
    DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS: ORA-1172 is said to happen when we failed to change on a block during instance recovery. This happens when a block is broken and fixed during its recovery. We have collected two dump files of the redo logs to investigate this symptom further. We would like to know what the reason to cause this symptom was and how to avoid / cope with this.
    *Cause: Crash recovery or instance recovery could not apply a change to a block because it was not the next change. This can happen if the block was corrupted and then repaired during recovery.
    *Action: Do a RECOVER DATAFILE for the file containing the block. If this does not resolve the problem then restore the file from a backup and recover it.

  • Oracle Installer strange behavior!

    After installing the latest version of oracle database lite, I deinstalled it.
    Now when I try to install something, the Oracle Installer just closes without installing and without any message of error. I'm using the Oracle Installer 10.1.0.3.0! This happens after I choose what to install.
    Did this happen to anyone?!

    Hi,
    This problem normally occures when block corruption happens.
    DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS: ORA-1172 is said to happen when we failed to change on a block during instance recovery. This happens when a block is broken and fixed during its recovery. We have collected two dump files of the redo logs to investigate this symptom further. We would like to know what the reason to cause this symptom was and how to avoid / cope with this.
    *Cause: Crash recovery or instance recovery could not apply a change to a block because it was not the next change. This can happen if the block was corrupted and then repaired during recovery.
    *Action: Do a RECOVER DATAFILE for the file containing the block. If this does not resolve the problem then restore the file from a backup and recover it.

  • How do you avoid unneccesary "array copies"?

    Hello - I have been having significant difficulty trying to optimize my code as I have been finding that LabView tends to make copies of variables almost everytime you access them. This may not be a big deal some times, but in my case, I am using arrays that are 10MB in size or greater, and making duplicates of them not only wastes memory, but also time. I would like to figure out a way to avoid this. From what I can see, using a continuous thread with shift registers and sequence locals can reduce some of the duplication, but generally that becomes a wiring nightmare in the diagram. Also, one thing that I would like to do is keep some of these arrays within a record format, but I think anytime you have a wire coming out of a
    bundle, a new copy of that variable is made. I'd like to be able to use pointers, but someone from NI told me pointers were a "bad word" in LabView and references obviously don't work the same.
    Any ideas would be appreciated (sorry the text is long).

    > I have read that document, and especially in terms of the
    > bundling/unbundling, it more or less just states to avoid it which for
    > my application may not be the easiest solution. Also, in it a phrase
    > reads "Each level of unbundling/indexing might result in a copy of
    > that data being generated". I'm trying to figure out when "might"
    > becomes "does" or "doesn't". Also, I have seen the consequences of
    > using locals, globals and "value" property nodes. I wonder why LabView
    > requires making a copy when these are used (because programatically
    > within the scope of the diagram they are much easier to use then
    > sequence locals and shift registers). thanks.
    First, I'll comment on the local and value property. If the AE really
    said that pointers are a dirty word in LabVIEW, what they really meant
    was that LabVIEW works on dataflow and really doesn't expose the pointers.
    The upside of this is that it is much less likely that you will have
    uninitialized values, stale pointers, memory leaks, etc. You also have
    much clearer idea of what is happening to your data, and parallelism is
    much easier to see/use. The downside is that you have less control.
    Also, it is best not to think of the reference as a pointer/reference to
    data, but instead it is a reference to a UI object, the control or
    indicator.
    Locals and reference->value are convenient when you are used to writing
    lines of code, or expressions that move the data from one location to
    another. This code is typically using a sequence to make lines of code
    where each of them loads what it needs, modifies it, then stores the
    results. Again, this feels familiar, but it is not what works well in
    dataflow like LV. It works much better to largely get rid of the
    sequences and simply let the data dependency do the work.
    Doing this should automatically help your memory usage provided you keep
    the items in the performance chapter in the back of your mind. Also,
    remember that subVIs normally don't hurt memory usage provided their
    panel is not open, and they can even help with memory usage as storage
    buffers can be reused.
    For the unbundle issue, hopefully your have an array of rather small
    records, but in the event you have a record with large arrays, you do
    need to avoid repeatedly accessing the elements, indexing, etc. You may
    want to build a data access subVI that can do the indexing, searching,
    etc in a common location and avoid returning the big arrays. This also
    allows for the storage to be moved to a shift register and the whole
    thing becomes a functional global.
    You might want to spend a little time browsing through the examples for
    smart or functional globals as well as some of the analysis ones that
    process arrays to see how they deal with the sequencing and wiring.
    Greg McKaskle

  • Avoid summarization in cj88 to COPA

    Hi All,
    do you know if is there any way to avoid summarization in cj88 to COPA?
    I need to settle a WBS to COPA, and maintain the original splitting of cost of sale from Results Analysis.
    Regards
    Simone

    Hi All,
    do you know if is there any way to avoid summarization in cj88 to COPA?
    I need to settle a WBS to COPA, and maintain the original splitting of cost of sale from Results Analysis.
    Regards
    Simone

  • How to avoid multiple copies of data in page refresh

    How to avoid multiple copies of data in page refresh

    If you are talking about a page with an insert query, ignore the fact that it's a page refresh.  It's just another way that someone can insert duplicate records.  I like to handle this in my insert query.
    insert into thetable
    (f1, f2, etc)
    select distinct
    value1, value2, etc
    from some_small_table
    where you don't already have that record

  • Avoid memory copies

    Hi All, 
    I am trying to avoid making multiple copies to Improve efficiency. Attached is the vi taken from a larger program. The idea here is to replace 2 D array(Image data) at each iteration, the vi attached shows the first 8 pages of the 3d array is being replaced. This number could change ,that is why I’m allocating 100 pages on the 3d constant. However, the performance of the vi seems to be dependent on the 3d array size which might suggest to me that I’m making data copies for each iteration. In theory, if what we are doing inside the for loop is just replacing the 2D array of 0 to 7 pages, the performance should be independent of the 3d array size? I have used the “show buffer allocation “ tool and there is not buffer allocated at the shift register. Does this mean that we are not making multiple copies for each iteration?
    Please advice
    Thanks
    Attachments:
    Inplace.vi ‏130 KB

    Well, you array has 31M element, using 120+ MB of memory. This will not fit in the processor cache, so there is some penalty.
    You have to be really careful with constant folding, because you are using diagram constants. If I disable debugging in your code, it executes in 0 ms because everything is folded. After replacing the constants with controls to avoid folding, it still executes 20x faster than with debugging enabled. A lot of the overhead seems to be in the debugging code.
    (I would also wire the output to somewhere, else the compiler might eliminate the entire thing as part of dead code elimination.)
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • How do I avoid keeping copies of messages in Mail?

    I have a really low capacity MacBook Air. Earlier this year, I discovered I could keep it usable without a bunch of "running low on disk space" warnings by limiting the caching performed by Safari and Mail. In Safari it was easy, it's in Preferences, but in Mail it was a bit buried - select the account, advanced tab, and then "don't keep copies of any messages".
    Problem is, it seems like in Mavericks this preference is gone. Is there an equivalent? I'm out of room on my Air once again.

    @Lanny: For the record, I am not keeping a copy of every single email–emails are kept selectively and folders are well-organized. Attachments are stripped unless strictly needed. The problem isn't just size, it is the amount of files copied, and the number of devices onto which your emails are duplicated across. It is just wasted bandwidth and storage space. Nevertheless, even with selective mail handling the total amount of storage  easily number a couple of gigabytes if you have a couple of years worth of emails.
    Your suggestion to use POP3 instead of IMAP would be more relevant if Mail.app had retained the 'Do not keep copies of any messages' setting when setting up your account as POP3 instead of IMAP. However, it does not. The setting is not present anymore in the Mail.app version shipped with OSX Mavericks–regardless of whether POP3 or IMAP is being used.
    Furthermore, what you describe as the 'main features and advantages of using IMAP' is simply not correct. Every mail client by default copies your messages from the server for use locally. Where IMAP differs is that one can subscribe to commonly-used folders (which will be synchronized and kept up-to-date on the client), whereas less frequently-used folders only reside on the server. These emails can be accessed quickly thanks to IMAP's efficient search mechanisms–both for header or full-text searches. So in short it has much better ways of locating your messages that conventional POP3 clients have. There is rarely a need to have a local copy at all.
    It actually appears that you have mixed up IMAP and POP3, as the IMAP 'advantage' you are stating is specific to POP3. With POP3, email is  stored on the server until you check your email, where it is fetched from the mail server and stored locally–often with the remote copy expunged–which is the complete opposite of what is intended.
    The differences and benefits of using IMAP vs. POP3 are explained here:
    http://mail2web.com/blog/2010/02/pop-imap-difference/
    Your other suggestion regarding upgrading the harddrive simply to store multiple copies of email is a rather questionable solution if you ask me, as the SSDs are welded onto the MacBooks and cannot be replaced without tearing it apart (or spending a huge amount of money to have it serviced by Apple in order to do so). There is also the question of justifying a purchase of a bigger drive just because Apple removed an option in one of their core applications.
    So my question as to why this core IMAP functionality was removed still stands. This is clearly an impairment of functionality which should be dealt with by Apple instead of forcing its users to abandon the way mail is being accessed, or resorting to expensive and cumbersome workarounds.

  • Deploy reports in ssrs which are renamed and avoid multiple copies

    Hi, I have renamed few of my reports renamed and checked in. Usually we deploy it from BIDS off of TFS reports solution. We are using SQL Server 2008 R2 version. I tried deploying these reports to DEV & QA environments and report manager has 2 copies
    of the same report one with the old name & the other with the rename. What would be the approriate way to delete these reports from Production without having to do it manually.
    Thanks in advance...........
    Ione

    You have to delete them manually in this case. 
    There is no way around it.
    Thanks! Josh

  • Where do I find settings to avoid saving duplicate copies of files

    I have just about had it with this overpriced piece of ####, but my wife loves it and this is her machine.
    I see there are numerous copies of the same file in the same directory\folder. (documents, pictures, you name it)
    Is there someplace I can set the system to challenge when someone attempts to save or copy a file to a folder in which a file with that same name already exists?
    Thank you for you help

    I don't quite understand the question; the only way a file can be saved with the same name in the same folder (directory) is if it's saved as a different file type (i.e. with a different file extension).
    So you can have fred.jpg and fred.tif and fred.pdf all in the same folder, but trying to save any one of them with the same extension will bring up the warning dialogue asking if you want to replace the original.
    Saving as a copy will modify the name to fred copy.jpg for example.

  • To Avoid illegal copies

    I have jus finished my project, I am thinking on selling it; the problem is that (obviously) I dont want to somebody makes illegal copies of it.
    I was thinking in checking the mac address so, it will only work in one machine with a specific NIC. But, what if somebody get the classes that are in my jar file and use it; how I can get all my project in one class so no one can read it, or make some use of it.
    Could somebdoy give me some tips, or where to get info about how to protect java software?

    Try obfuscating your Java bytecode, using an Java obfuscation tool. Just search online for Java obfuscation tools, and you'll find quite a few. I believe Sun used Dash-O to obfuscate their JCE code.
    SCJP, SCJD, SCEA, SCWCD, SCBCD
    CISSP, PMP, PHR
    OCPDBA 8i/9i
    http://www.certgear.com

Maybe you are looking for