AW01N- Total of write up not matching with total of indivudual transaction

Hi,
While viewing any Asset via AW01N, the total of Write up transaction is not matching with the total of individual transactions displayed in same screen.(It displays only last transaction value in total of write up transcation)
We applied OSS note No. 762128 still the problem exists.
Please inform me if anybody has resolved this before.
Thanks
Prasad

Hi,
Please note that the determination of the costs behaves differently in
the itemization and in the cost component split.
In the itemization, each item is rounded separately, while in the cost
component split first the individual items will be added up and then the
value will be rounded. The differences can be avoided by increasing the
lot sizes.
Please review sap note 168238, which explains the systems behaviour
and check the solution.
To avoid the occurrance of this problem you should
- always cost the header material again if an ingoing component with
changed values is being costed.
- also cost all materials again following a price calculation for a
particular period.
Please do not forget:
The itemization view only displayed the itemization on that level,
while the cost component view will display the cost component split
from all levels.
Please review sap note 889474. Sap note 66900 also explain why
small differences arise between the itemization and the cost component
split.
I hope helps,
Regards,
MLM

Similar Messages

Totals in BEx query not matching with actual total

Hi,
We have one report in BI, the total for few columns (Given by BI system i.e system generated) for the values of the key figures is not matching with actual total of that values...
I am confused to see, how sap BI can do the totaling mistake...
Please suggest and help....
Thanks,
Nitika

Hi
Please check following things
1. Check key figure aggregation properties, how it is defined, it might have been defined as Avg, Last,first value or it might using exceptional aggregates.
2. Double check your process of validation between cube and bex report for totals.
Thanks
Raghu.

Total calls presented does not match with the calls presented value in CSQ activity report (by interval)

Hi,
We encountered a mismatch details between the call presented value and total call presented value. I attached the report here. If you count the number of calls presented and handled there are 2 calls but why is it the total calls only count 1. Where did the other call go?
I look for some possible related problems but the answer only point out to a bug. The version of UCCX is 8.5.1 SU 3 and the bug was solved in version 7.0.
Hope you can help me with this issue.
Thanks and regards,
Rona

It looks like it may be an issue with the report file itself and not the report data. You can see both calls are shown in the report but the summary information doesn't appear to be calculating correctly. If you have the Crystal Reports Developer toolset you can open the report file and verify that the report summary is using SUM instead of something like MAX/AVG, etc.
Tanner

Total Amount before Discount do not match Row total

Hi,
I have this scenario for my A/R invoice. The amount in the the total (lc) column do not match with the total before discount field.
So, when I tried to create Cm for this invoice I encountered an error: There is a difference between total and it's contents.
What is the possible cause for this and how will I resolve this?
Thanks!

Hi Nelle,
If you are create any UDF related to this calculation at row level then first remove it then check it.
There are no any UDF created then upgrade your PL..
Thanks,
Srujal Patel

GL account balance not matching with the total stock value

Hi,
The GL account balance is not matching with the total stock value in report RM07MBSTfor stock in transit, Can anyone please let me know, where should, I look into to verify the reason for difference.
Quick response will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards

I am able to solve this issue. My client has a customized report, which helped me to look into the details of stock in tranisit account. Stock in transit account actually include PPV and TPV alongwith standard cost.

Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
Thanks

is your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
if then,
From Front-end:
Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
From Database side:
1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
Is that BI-Apps project?
btw, whtz ur name?

Why the doc total amount is not matched with the total item line amount?

Hi,
Recently when i try to update something in sales order via my add-on, i got an error said u201CThere is a difference between the document total and its components. [ORDR.DocTotal][line: 0] Iu201D Then i checked the sales order in SAP B1, I found the document total amount was not matched with the item line total amount. Actually the item line is quite simple, there is only one item line with qty 1. How comes the document total could be different with the amount from item line? I know the document total amount is a read-only field which is calculated automatically by SAP. This is really weird for us, we don't know how this happened.
Has anyone experienced similar situation like mine and how this happens?
Thanks,
Lan

I am having this same issue and I have additional information.
I am on ver. 8.8 PL 16.
Periodically (mulitiple times a week), when a Sales Order is created, the Doc Total amount is -zero- when there are clearly items that have a price associated with them. This causes an error when Adding the document. Sometimes, I can just change the quantity of one of the items, which forces the Doc Total to update. Most of the time this does not work, though. I end up having to restart the SAP client and then everything begins to work as it should.
This behavior is occuring on mulitple machines in our office.
Earlier in this thread, Rahul mentioned that they currency rounding was turned off and that this could be part of the problem. In fact, we were having issues with Currency Rounding and did turn it off not long ago. Rahul, can you explain better what you meant by "give the proper amount so that you can overcome the error..."
Randy Davis
Denver, CO
Edited by: Randy Davis on May 16, 2011 2:01 PM

The number of details is not matching with the total count.

Hi all, again stuck with the code.
There is a form where i have to populate all the details of few tables in excel & there is a report where i have to make count of all these details.
The problem here is the number of details that is populated in excel is not matching with the count in report, both have to match. There some problem in code, please help me in matching it.
The below is the 5 tables with the columns below.
Tables are ENQACEDTL, ENQACEHDR, ENQACMDTL, ENQACMHDR, ENQACSPEC:
The Names mentioned below the table's name are Column Names:
ENQACEDTL
ENQACEHDR
ENQACMDTL
ENQACMHDR
ENQACSPEC
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENGREF
ENGREF
QTY
OFFREF
MINSL
ITEM
EPREPBY
ITEM
BRANCH
EINSL
FRAME
DEPT
RATING
DEPT
MTEMP
TECOLD
ENGREFTDT
ENCLIP
MKTREF
ETEMP
THE BELOW IS THE SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR POPULATING DATA IN EXCEL:
SELECT ENQACEDTL.ENQNO, ENQACEDTL.ENQAMDNO, ......... (....ALL COLUMNS)
FROM ENQACMHDR,ENQACMDTL,ENQACEHDR,ENQACEDTL,ENQACSPEC
WHERE
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACMDTL.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENQNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACMDTL.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACEHDR.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACEHDR.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREF=ENQACEDTL.ENGREF AND
ENQACMDTL.ITEM=ENQACEDTL.ITEM AND
ENQACMHDR.DEPT=:PROC_DEPT AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREFDT BETWEEN :FROMDATE AND :TODATE
ORDER BY ENQACMHDR.ENQNO,ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO;
THE BELOW IS THE SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR COUNT OF DETAILS IN REPORT:
SELECT ALL ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.DEPT, COUNT(ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.ENQNO) COUNT
FROM ACENQ.ENQACEDTL, ACENQ.ENQACEHDR
WHERE (ACENQ.ENQACEDTL.ENGREF=ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.ENGREF)
AND ENQACEHDR.LOCKE=1 AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREFDT BETWEEN :P_STDATE AND :P_ENDDATE
GROUP BY ENQACEHDR.DEPT;
There is problem in join condition of 1st code that is in the "SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR POPULATING DATA IN EXCEL":
Please help me to sort out this problem..
Thank You.
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Oracle Forms & Reports Builder 6i.

As Karthick points out, we cannot help if we cannot see your correct table structures (create table statements) and some example data and expected output (insert statements would be helpful). You're telling us there's a problem, but we cannot see what the problem is as you've not shown it. Just saying your query is not working is like me telling you my car is not working, but not telling you what the symptoms are. You wouldn't know where to start in fixing it.
Why are you using Oracle 9.2.0.1 ? Not only has that version been unsupported for about a decade, but 9.2.0.7 was the first version of 9i that was considered 'stable' as versions prior to that were considered buggy. So you're using an old, unsupported and buggy version of oracle. Seriously, you need to consider upgrading to a supported version, preferably at least the latest 11g version.
And what has oracle Forms and Reports got to do with the issue?
And please explain how you are getting your data out of Excel and presenting it to Oracle to be able to query against it. Excel does not have "tables", so your question is completely unclear how you are querying the data from Excel.

CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
Satya

Hi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman

Planning area data not matching with backup cube / PSA

Hi friends,
while loading data from planning area to backup cube , for the key figure ( result of a macro),the data in planning area is not matching with PSA as well as with cube.
At the same time Data is matching at total level but not at disagregated level. And many times it disagregate in equal Proportion in cube/psa.
Pls its urgent.
Pts for sure.
Vishal.
9326179903

make sure you have replicated the extraction of the data source. This is needed to ensure your backup cube gets the current data as in the planning area
if you got to /SAPAPO/SDP_EXTR then you can see this button
you can set this up as a program scheduled to run before the updation of your cube
As for the disaggregation, test at what level you are choosing your characteristic? ( i suppose you can choose the level)
Are you extracting at a detailed level or at the aggregated level
Is your macro saving the data into a Keyfigure or is it an auxilliary KF or something?

Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

Dear all,
When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
Deticked all check boxes in it.
Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
Jeyakanthan

Hai!
What version of SAP B1 u r using.
I do got the same problem for my customer. I did this..
1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
2. Export to Excel
3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
4. Export TB to Excel.
5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
*Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
*Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
9. see the reconcillation details.
10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K
+91 9710445987

GR/IR account G/L balance does not match with BSIS table

Hi,
I am preparing a report which uses table BSIS.But the total in the table does not match with the GR/IR G/L balance account.When I click on balance item display in FS10N the entries match with that of BSIS but the total is different.Also how to factor the year opening balance entries in the report.
Thanks
Arun

But that will slow down the system considerabley, because BSEG contains a huge data

F_IT_01 does not match with FAGLGVTR

Hello All,
What is the reason for report F_IT_01 not matching with FAGLGVTR
Please advice

Hello,
I would not advise you to do such things in your environment.2 mins is very less time how could you be so sure a 2 min query is bad. And your second point is totally baseless it wouldtake a query a fraction of secondto read 1000 rows.My answer would be please
dont implement.
If you want to test below query might achieve the first requirement, I have not tested it please treat this query as hint and optimize or add anything if required.
If you schedule this query through agent for every 2 mins or 5 mins .It can achieve.But some query takes more time to rollback than to finish scheduling this would lead to unstable environment
USE MASTER
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TEMPDB.SYS.ALL_OBJECTS WHERE NAME LIKE '#KILL_CONNECTION')
BEGIN
DROP TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
END
CREATE TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
SESSION_ID INT
,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME BIGINT
,START_TIME DATETIME
INSERT INTO #KILL_CONNECTION
SELECT
SESSION_ID
,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME
,START_TIME
FROM SYS.DM_EXEC_REQUESTS
WHERE TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME > 7200 AND SESSION_ID > 50
DECLARE @SESSION_ID BIGINT
DECLARE @CMD VARCHAR(1000)
DECLARE KILL_CONNECTION CURSOR FOR
SELECT SESSION_ID
FROM #KILL_CONNECTION
OPEN KILL_CONNECTION
FETCH NEXT FROM KILL_CONNECTION INTO @SESSION_ID
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CMD = 'KILL ' + @SESSION_ID
EXECUTE (@CMD)
END
CLOSE KILL_CONNECTION
DEALLOCATE KILL_CONNECTION godrop table #Kill_connection
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

Free space of mdf and ldf does not match with database free space

In SSMS i saw file size related properties and found below details for one database.Here values does not match with other properties. Here size of the mdf, ldf and total size matches with other values under each window. But Available free space of mdf and ldf
if added then it does not equal to Available free space shown in shrink database window and free space shown in database properties. This is true for any database. Why is it so? Please can anyone explain the logic behind this?
Under database properties:
Size: 91.31 MB
Space available:13.40 MB
Under database file properites:
mdf size:17 MB
ldf size:75 MB
under shrink database:
currently allocated size:91.31 MB
Available free space:13.40 MB
under shrink file-for data file:
currently allocated size:16.38 MB
Available free space:12.63 MB
under shrink file-for log file:
currently allocated size:74.94 MB
Available free space:55.62 MB

Hi,
Database properties and database shrink show the total (log+data) values. Others show the individual sizes, log and data separately.
I hope it helps.
Janos
There are 10 type of people. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
My Blog |
Hire Me
This does not answer my question. If you add allocated space of mdf and ldf it equals to database allocated size.But i am asking why this ldf and mdf free space together(when added 55.62+12.63 ) does not equal to database free space?

Entry View is not matching with General Ledger View in a document

Dear Experts
My problem is entry view is not matching with general ledger view because of profit center. I have posted the general ledger account with posting key 40 and profit center 1200 but when we see the same through general ledger view getting different profit center (i.e. 1410).
Offsetting general ledger account is compulsory ? if it is working for one general ledger account it should support other general ledger accounts also, but it is not the same in our scenario. Any customization level problem ?
Earliest help is needed.
Thanks - VG.

Hello VG,
In the general ledger view, the line items for the selected ledger are taken from a data merge between the document line items in the entry view and the document line items in the general ledger view. In the case of fields that exist in both views, the data in the general ledger view takes priority. However, fields are only transferred from the general ledger view to the fields in the entry view if they are active in the relevant ledger. If fields exist in the general ledger table group but are not active in the relevant ledger, they are transferred from the entry view. In the data merge, amounts in the entry view are in some cases (such as cash discounts) distributed proportionately across the amounts in the general ledger view. This is necessary if, as a result of document splitting, a line item in the entry view has been split into multiple line items in the general ledger view. The proportionately distributed amounts in the entry view cannot then be used for reconciliation with account balances because the total of the cash discount amounts from the line items, for example, does not correspond to the balance of the cash discount account as a result of the rounding differences.
Pls check this,
Rgds
Manish

AW01N- Total of write up not matching with total of indivudual transaction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for