Backup fail after kernel patches updated

Hello friends
i have update kernel pathes. then backup is failing cont. now my patch level is 114.
im getting error please suggest.
Job started
Step 001 started (program RSDBAJOB, variant &0000000000235, user ID BASIS1)
Execute logical command BRCONNECT On host sapodev
Parameters: -u / -jid STATS20080731152625 -c -f stats -t ALL
BR0801I BRCONNECT 7.00 (11)
BR0805I Start of BRCONNECT processing: cdymghmx.sta 2008-07-31 15.26.27
BR0252E Function fopen() failed for '/oracle/SAD/sapcheck/connSAD.log' at location main-11
BR0253E errno 13: Permission denied
BR0121E Processing of log file /oracle/SAD/sapcheck/connSAD.log failed
BR0806I End of BRCONNECT processing: cdymghmx.sta2008-07-31 15.26.31
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2008-07-31 15.26.31
BR0804I BRCONNECT terminated with errors
External program terminated with exit code 3
BRCONNECT returned error status E
Job finished
thanks & regards
sachin

Hi,
I think some of the answers are partially correct.
For the full and correct solution you must
> Check the owner, group, and access authorizations for BR*Tools and SAPDBA in accordance with Note [113747|http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/113747].

Similar Messages

Check Db fails after kernel patch update

Hi,
I've updated kernel 710 to the latest patch "159" on my PI 7.10 system, however now Check DB fails when scheduled from DB13 with a
"Scheduling failed" error.
We have SQL 2005 & I'm able to execute the job succesfully via the SQL Managemnt console.
Also, all the other background jobs are working just fine.
Pls. help.
Thanks,
Saba.
Edited by: Rajeev Ganju on Jul 22, 2009 2:37 PM

Hello,
Since I'm on SQL, I use DB13 just for Check DB.
I've tried deleting everything & recreating the schedule, but it has'nt helped.
Even after rescheduling, SM37 doesnt reflect the scheduled jobs.
Thanks,
Saba.
Edited by: Saba Sheikh on Jul 23, 2009 9:21 AM

Backup error after kernel patch upgrade

Hi.
I have a backup problem after the kernel patch upgrade. I have SAP R3 4.6C on HPUX11.0 with an Oracle 8.17 database.
I have upgraded kernel patch from 1655 to 2337.
Afterward, I am getting following backup error:
BR280I Time stamp 2007-11-06 09.29.01
BR279E Return code from '/usr/sap/HAD/SYS/exe/run/backint -u HAD -f backup -i /oracle/HAD/sapbackup/.bdwnpztp.lst -t file_online -c': 2
BR232E 0 of 115 files saved by backup utility
BR280I Time stamp 2007-11-06 09.29.01
BR231E Backup utility call failed
Does anyone know how to correct this?
Thank you.

Hi Jun,
backint is a link file that is in SAP kernel directory which links to the backup client on the server.
eg:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 32 Aug 13 2004 backint -> /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/backint
As part of kernel upgrade process, the kernel is backed up, mostly on the disk before upgrading. Check if this link exists and recreate it in the kernel directory, if no backup was done, compare it with other systems to get the details of the backint link.
Cheers,
Nisch

Static library not accessed properly after Solaris Kernel patch update !

Hi,
We are facing a sever issue in our application after our customer updated the Solaris 10 kernel patch u9 to u10.
We have two static libraries libdlib.a and libDLIB.a, with exactly same code base, but these two libraries are scattered across the code base and linked by many shared objects in our application.
However, one of the shared objects that links to "libdlib.a" library tries to access a function from "libDLIB.a". This behavior is causing a crash at a later point, since that shared object is supposed to access the function from "libdlib.a". Moreover, we found this is happening through the use of dbx.
I'm unable to understand why this problem surfaced after kernel patch update, though still the shared object works fine on Solaris 10 u9 patch.
Flow is something like this :
1. syslogrecorder.so gets loaded by one of the processes.
2. syslogrecorder.so is linked to "libdlib.a" at compile time, so it uses "libdlib.a" function DLIB_LoadLibrary and gets a handle to all the function pointers of the loaded library ( The purpose of DLIB_LoadLibrary is to load a shared library dynamically using dlopen )
3. syslogrecorder.so tries to do a "dlsym" and to do that it needs access to the library handle which we got in previous call DLIB_LoadLibrary. So syslogrecorder.so calls another function from DLIB_ProcAddress, which actually gives back the access to the loaded shared library.
Here is a catch in step 3, it is supposed to call DLIB_ProcAddress from the libdlib.a but as we observed from dbx output it does so by calling DLIB_ProcAddress from libDLIB.a and hence fails to give back the access to loaded shared library, causing crash at a later point in code.
Can someone put some light here that why this could happen ??
Thanks
Kuldeep

To clarify: You did not modify or rebuild any of your binaries, but after installing a kernel patch, the application stopped working. Most likely, something about your application depended on a accidental behavior of the runtime loader. That accidental behavior changed due to the patch, and your application failed.
For example, if there is a circular dependency among shared libraries, the loader will break the cycle at an arbitrary point to establish an initialization order. By accident, that order might work, in the sense of not causing a problem. A change to the loader could cause the cycle to be broken at a different point, and the resulting initialization order could cause a now-uninitialized object to be accessed. I'm not saying this is what is wrong, but this is an example of a dependency on accidental loader behavior.
Finding your actual problem will require tracing the sequence of operations leading up to the failure. You are more likely to find help in a Solaris linker forum. AFAIK, there are currently no Oracle forums for Solaris, and the old OpenSolaris forums have been converted to mailing lists. You can try the "tools-linking" list found on this page:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
I also suggest you review the paper on best practices for using shared libraries written by Darryl Gove and myself:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/servers-storage-admin/linkinglibraries-396782.html
If you have a service contract with Oracle, you can use your support channel to get more help.
Edited by: Steve_Clamage on May 18, 2012 3:21 PM

Webi scheduling error in BO 4.0 SP04 after security patch updates in windows server 2008 R2

We are getting below error in BO 4.0 SP04 Web Intelligence report scheduling after security patch updates in windows server 2008 R2
while trying to invoke the method com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.IServer.getServerContext() of an object returned from com.businessobjects.rebean.wi.impl.services.DocumentInstanceManagementServiceImpl.getServer(com.businessobjects.sdk.core.context.IContext, com.businessobjects.rebean.wi.model.engine.IDocumentInstance)
We have reverted back security patch but still giving above scheduling problem in BO 4.0 SP04 WebI and we can view and refresh report.
Is there any way to fix the scheduling problem in BO 4.0 SP04 WebI?

HI,
Check SAP notes if they will help you.
1934855 - Scheduled Web Intelligence documents fail with com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server Error
1916443 - Scheduling Web Intellignce reports which are having long names to excel and pdf fails.
1792921 - Unable to schedule Webi documents in Excel or PDF format

Kernel patch updation for solaris 10 x86

I have Solaris 10 06/06 installed on x86 machine which is using svm and clustered with another node. The kernel revision is 118855-19 from the uname -a output. I am looking for the kernel patch updation and I heard 118855-36 is the latest one. Shall I go ahead with this patch and what r the dependency patches for this.
If anyone done this please guide me..

Patch 118855-36 is the latest kernel patch for Solaris 10 on x86 and its dependencies are:
113000-01 117435-02 118344-14 119043-09 119255-14 121264-01 122035-01 123840-01 (or greater)
Whether you should go ahead and install the patch is up to you, if possible try it out on a test box first. For better advice on this matter, I would suggest posting in the Solaris 10 forum as this forum is for the Sun Update Connection, Patch Manager & PatchPro toolsets.

Kernel patch update for solaris 10 x86

I have Solaris 10 06/06 installed on x86 machine which is using svm and clustered with another node. The kernel revision is 118855-19 from the uname -a output. I am looking for the kernel patch updation and I heard 118855-36 is the latest one. Shall I go ahead with this patch and what r the dependency patches for this.
If anyone done this please suggest and guide me..

For Solaris 10 x86 the latest offered with smpatch is 125101-07 and yes it may be recommended to patch. Then again you said clustered with sun cluster? You may want to check the documentation and if your machines aren't facing the internet you may wait for 7/07 to hit the street and do an upgrade.

Backup Fails after several successful days - errors "Device is not ready" & "The System cannot find the path specified"

Well I am back again, with another backup issue. After fixing one issue with the backup failing after a reboot, I have encountered another which is starting to cause me a lot of headaches.
The setup is thus - the backups run on a host machine running Windows Server 2012, this hosts three VM's (1x Server 2012 and 2x2008 Since the 19th of December a single backup drive has been attached for the backups (not ideal but the company had closed for
the holidays) up until the 26th these backups were working flawlessly.
On the 26th the backup completed with warnings, transferring a good 90% of the data to the backup (2/3 VMs). On the 27th it transferred a bit more at around 95% (2/3 VMs). On the 28th, it didn't completely backup a single VM.
On the 28th this error appeared in the event logs and after checking in the snap-in the same errors appear on the warning days as the errored day.
The backup operation that started at '‎2014‎-‎12‎-‎28T20:30:09.774946400Z' has failed with following error code '0x80780049' (None of the items included in backup were backed up.). Please review the event details for a solution, and then rerun the backup
operation once the issue is resolved.
Thanks in advance/

Hi,
Please check the detailed error message in the backup log files in C:\Windows\Logs\WindowsServerBackup. In additional, you could go through the similar thread to help troubleshoot this issue:
Windows 2012 Backup for HyperV failed with error code '0x80780049'
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/f1a0c9c6-7b4c-409c-b4da-c145b8b59eb1/windows-2012-backup-for-hyperv-failed-with-error-code-0x80780049?forum=winserverhyperv
Best Regards,
Mandy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

XMII content area not opening after Netweaver patch update.

Hi all,
Recently we upgrade Netweaver patches [few] from 7.3 SP7 to 7.3 SP9, after the patch update XMII is not show main content area, Header and links in the left panel are displayed but the main content area is blank.
Error Trace:
#2.0 #2014 07 14 13:32:16:540#+0300#Error#com.sap.xmii.Illuminator.gui.homepage.HomePageBuilder#
##sap.com/xapps~xmii~ear#C0000A365209024C00000001000031D8#111421450000000004#sap.com/xapps~xmii~ear#com.sap.xmii.Illuminator.gui.homepage.HomePageBuilder#96221#353##1FCB79F10B4211E4BC70000006A4280A#f37849690b4111e4afb7000006a4280a#f37849690b4111e4afb7000006a4280a#0#Thread[HTTP Worker [@2100786422],5,Dedicated_Application_Thread]#Plain##
Error transfering attributes org.w3c.dom.DOMException: INVALID_CHARACTER_ERR: An invalid or illegal XML character is specified. #
#2.0 #2014 07 14 13:32:31:063#+0300#Error#com.sap.xapps.mpm.interceptors.AuthorizationChecker#
#NONE#sap.com/xapps~mpm~ear#C0000A365209024D00000017000031D8#111421450000000004#sap.com/xapps~mpm~ear#com.sap.xapps.mpm.interceptors.AuthorizationChecker#96221#353#JTA Transaction : 57060#1FCB79F10B4211E4BC70000006A4280A#204e5c880b4211e4b3cb000006a4280a#204e5c880b4211e4b3cb000006a4280a#0#Thread[HTTP Worker [@15878578],5,Dedicated_Application_Thread]#Plain##
com.sap.xapps.oee.ejb.exception.OEELocalizedException: User 96221 does not have authorization to execute this service; user is trying to perform action read#
#2.0 #2014 07 14 13:32:31:063#+0300#Error#com.sap.xapps.mpm.interceptors.ExceptionHandlerInterceptor#
#NONE#sap.com/xapps~mpm~ear#C0000A365209024D00000019000031D8#111421450000000004#sap.com/xapps~mpm~ear#com.sap.xapps.mpm.interceptors.ExceptionHandlerInterceptor#96221#353#JTA Transaction : 57060#1FCB79F10B4211E4BC70000006A4280A#204e5c880b4211e4b3cb000006a4280a#204e5c880b4211e4b3cb000006a4280a#0#Thread[HTTP Worker [@15878578],5,Dedicated_Application_Thread]#Plain##
com.sap.xapps.oee.ejb.exception.OEELocalizedException: User <USER_ID>does not have authorization to execute this service; user is trying to perform action read#
#2.0 #2014 07 14 13:32:31:079#+0300#Error#com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.ejb.model#
#BC-JAS-EJB#tc~cm~ejb~api#C0000A365209024D0000001B000031D8#111421450000000004#sap.com/xapps~mpm~ui#com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.ejb.model#96221#353##1FCB79F10B4211E4BC70000006A4280A#204e5c880b4211e4b3cb000006a4280a#204e5c880b4211e4b3cb000006a4280a#0#Thread[HTTP Worker [@15878578],5,Dedicated_Application_Thread]#Plain##
execute
Component and version:
Component
Version
ADSSAP
1000.7.30.0.0.20101020230400
AJAX-RUNTIME
1000.7.30.9.19.20140618151600
BASETABLES
1000.7.30.9.1.20140217143400
BI-WDALV
1000.7.30.7.2.20120925175200
CFG_ZA
1000.7.30.7.1.20120710234700
CFG_ZA_CE
1000.7.30.7.0.20120312160300
CORE-TOOLS
1000.7.30.9.15.20140609162300
DI_CBS
1000.7.30.9.0.20130217111100
DI_CLIENTS
1000.7.30.7.2.20120808174400
DI_CMS
1000.7.30.9.0.20130217111100
DI_DTR
1000.7.30.9.1.20130429184500
ENGFACADE
1000.7.30.9.3.20130731225200
ENGINEAPI
1000.7.30.9.13.20140514195200
EP-BASIS-API
1000.7.30.9.3.20131203022700
ESI-UI
1000.7.30.7.1.20120419061400
ESP_FRAMEWORK
1000.7.30.7.3.20121022202400
ESREG-BASIC
1000.7.30.7.2.20130915212500
ESREG-SERVICES
1000.7.30.7.0.20120312224700
FRAMEWORK
1000.7.30.9.6.20140312211900
FRAMEWORK-EXT
1000.7.30.9.11.20140510042200
J2EE-APPS
1000.7.30.9.8.20140513152200
J2EE-FRMW
1000.7.30.9.20.20140702194800
JSPM
1000.7.30.7.1.20131029203300
LM-CORE
1000.7.30.9.10.20140702194800
LM-CTS
1000.7.30.7.5.20121018185000
LM-CTS-UI
1000.7.30.7.0.20120312160500
LM-MODEL-BASE
1000.7.30.7.0.20120312170300
LM-MODEL-NW
1000.7.30.7.0.20120312170300
LM-SLD
1000.7.30.7.3.20130822180000
LMCFG
1000.7.30.7.7.20130211235800
LMCTC
1000.7.30.7.5.20120823193700
LMNWABASICAPPS
1000.7.30.9.7.20140528172400
LMNWABASICCOMP
1000.7.30.7.1.20120501171100
LMNWABASICMBEAN
1000.7.30.7.2.20130509173200
LMNWACDP
1000.7.30.7.0.20120312170300
LMNWATOOLS
1000.7.30.7.0.20120313005500
LMNWAUIFRMRK
1000.7.30.7.3.20131028182100
MESSAGING
1000.7.30.9.31.20140616191000
MII_ADMIN
1000.14.0.4.2.20140310045511
ODATA-CXF-EXT
1000.7.30.8.3.20130619172700
OEE_MII
1000.1.0.2.0.20140110094411
SAP-XI3RDPARTY
1000.7.30.0.0.20101021060500
SAPMECORE
1000.6.1.4.14.201405091456
SAPMECTC
1000.6.1.4.2.20140513105149
SAPMEINT
1000.6.1.4.9.20140513105113
SAPMEINTCTC
1000.6.1.4.2.20140411083601
SAPMELEGACY
1000.6.1.4.14.201405091456
SAP_BUILDT
1000.7.30.9.0.20130217101400
SECURITY-EXT
1000.7.30.7.5.20121008182800
SERVERCORE
1000.7.30.9.31.20140702194800
SOAMONBASIC
1000.7.30.9.1.20130626201800
SR-UI
1000.7.30.7.0.20120313005400
UDDI
1000.7.30.7.0.20120312224700
UISAPUI5_JAVA
1000.7.30.9.19.20140130141100
UMEADMIN
1000.7.30.7.7.20130515172000
WD-ADOBE
1000.7.30.7.0.20120312164400
WD-APPS
1000.7.30.9.0.20130217123000
WD-RUNTIME
1000.7.30.9.22.20140609172000
WD-RUNTIME-EXT
1000.7.30.9.0.20130217123000
WSRM
1000.7.30.9.0.20130217140200
XMII
1000.14.0.4.3.20140314030733
Are we missing patch updates?
Has anyone faced this issue, any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,

Please see SAP Note 2040655 for this fix.
Regards, Steve

After Kernel-Patch 139556-08 System wont come up

Hello...
Yesterday I installed KernelPatch 139556-08 (x86-64bit s10x_u6wos_07b ) in multiusermode on a Virtual machine installed on a Vmware ESX 3.5 machine.
After rebooting the System wont come up - only in failsafe 32 bit mode - Mounting the ZFS Systempool under /a is working too. The System crashes with a dump -
starting with errormessages "rootnex ....undefined iommulib".
Any chances to recover my System without a backup ?

I made the same mistake using the recommended patchset from 13/8. On 30 systems the patch set went in fine
in full user mode. Then I thought that it should be save to apply to my latest server, which I installed using a zfs
root file system. The patch 139556-08 failed to install and the patch script stop with
Applying 139556-08 ( 45 of 160) ... failed
Application of patches finished : 2009.09.01 17:28:01
Following patches were applied :
119255-67 126869-03 140900-01 119784-12 125556-05
140172-02 140797-01 121119-16 139521-02 141017-01
140084-02 140861-01 120273-26 119758-15 138867-02
Following patches were skipped :
Patches already applied
120901-03 120720-02 117435-02 121454-02 125504-02
121334-04 118344-14 121264-01 118855-36 120012-14
119318-01 118919-21 113000-07 126424-03 127128-11
121297-01 123840-04 138218-01 122641-06 138884-01
122035-05 127756-01 121454-02 125548-02 137138-09
127885-01
Patches obsoleted by one or more patches already applied
118844-20 124205-05 122661-08
Following patch failed to apply :
139556-08
Aborting due to failure while applying patch 139556-08.
Application of this patch should have succeeded - this failure is unexpected.
Please assess cause of failure and verify system integrity before proceeding.
Install log files written :
/var/sadm/install_data/s10x_rec_cluster_short_2009.09.01_17.23.54.log
/var/sadm/install_data/s10x_rec_cluster_verbose_2009.09.01_17.23.54.log
/var/sadm/install_data/s10x_rec_cluster_failed_2009.09.01_17.23.54.log
So the patch did not apply. However on re reboot the system went into single user
mode with error messages on cpu cpupm etc.
I then rebooted and went into fail safe and did an auto update. After that the system
crashes on a full boot up, but I can still gotinto failsafe.
I have got no copy of the patch on the system so I am somewhat "stuffed".
This is the second time a recommended patchset ruined one of my main file servers
and previously I installed it single user mode.
Any idea how I can get out of this mess short of re-installing.
Considering that the problem was reported way back in May should such an important
issue not have been seen and remedied before?

SRM catalog navigation fails after Microsoft patch KB2416400

After applying Microsoft patch KB2416400, displaying catalogs is failing in IE7 and IE8. Getting the "Navigation to the webpage was canceled"... If you uninstall the patch, it will fix the issue in IE7. I have already reviewed the settings found in OSSN 1511147, which has not solved the issue when the patch is applied. Has anyone else applied this IE security patch and experienced similar results? We are on SRM7.0, SP05 - EP and catalogs both using https. Thanks.

Hi Kris,
we found a solution. Please look in SAP Note 1456162.
The note was written for IE 8, but it looks that the MS patch KB2416400 provides the same security measure also for IE 7.
IE7 does not allow the dynamic rendering of html by the outbound handler after the patch.
Cheers,
Jan

Steps for Kernel Patch Updation on Solaris 10 X4100 with 2disks mirrored

Hi all,
I have Solaris 10 10/06 (118855-19) installed on one of the X4100 server. This is the time for me to update the latest kernel patch (118855-36). We have two disks mirrored. My questions are,
1) Do i need to detach any of the disk from the mirror before doing any patching.
2) Is it possible to install the patches without detaching any disks from the mirror. (i.e. installeing patch on mirrored root filesystem)
3) how to boot from the second disk in case the patch installation creates problem while booting up.
Any suggestions or steps which you have already implemented for the above scenario.

This isn't really a question for this forum, you may be better to look at some of the sys-admin forums for a complete answer.
You should not need to break the mirror in order to apply the kernel patch, however doing so would allow for quicker recovery of the system should something go wrong during patching.
I would strongly advise that you read the special install instructions for the kernel patch prior to installing it.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-118855-36-1
You may also wish to use a patch cluster rather than smpatch/updatemanager, these can be downloaded from SunSolve:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/private-cgi/show.pl?target=patchpage

Backup failed after upgrade

I just upgrade the database from 9i to 10.2.0.4. After the upgrade, the backup failed with the following error. What's wrong and how to fix? Thanks!
CBRP:/opt/app/oracle:>rman target / catalog xx/xx@cdbp
Recovery Manager: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Aug 17 08:51:03 2009
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
connected to target database: CBRP (DBID=2190525556)
connected to recovery catalog database
PL/SQL package RMANNEW.DBMS_RCVCAT version 10.02.00.03 in RCVCAT database is not current
PL/SQL package RMANNEW.DBMS_RCVMAN version 10.02.00.03 in RCVCAT database is not current
RMAN> backup database;
Starting backup at 17-AUG-2009 08:51:40
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of backup command at 08/17/2009 08:51:41
RMAN-03014: implicit resync of recovery catalog failed
RMAN-03009: failure of full resync command on default channel at 08/17/2009 08:51:41
RMAN-10015: error compiling PL/SQL program
RMAN-10014: PL/SQL error 0 on line 2138 column 12: Statement ignored
RMAN-10014: PL/SQL error 306 on line 2138 column 12: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'CHECKPROXYARCHIVEDLOG'
RMAN-10014: PL/SQL error 0 on line 1970 column 12: Statement ignored
RMAN-10014: PL/SQL error 306 on line 1970 column 12: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'CHECKBACKUPREDOLOG'
RMAN-10014: PL/SQL error 0 on line 1810 column 12: Statement ignored
RMAN-10014: PL/SQL error 306 on line 1810 column 12: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'CHECKBACKUPREDOLOG'
RMAN-10014: PL/SQL error 0 on line 1618 column 15: Statement ignored
RMAN-10014: PL/SQL error 306 on line 1618 column 15: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'CHECKARCHIVEDLOG'

Pl see if MOS Doc 312661.1 (Rman Resync Fails Due to Invalid Objects after Upgrading Catalog to 10g) is applicable here
HTH
Srini

Oracle field length error after Oracle patch update

Dear All,
We have an ABAP program wherein we are inserting records in an external (non-SAP) Oracle DB
by means of native SQL. On 22/08/2010, we had updated an Oracle patch in the production server.
After the patch was updated, the program has started throwing error:
An SQL error has occurred: ORA-12899: value too
large for column
"CELLAPPS"."AWLTBLMESSAGES"."MESSAGETEXT" (actual:
438, maximum: 350)#ORA-06512: at line 1
The message text variable has only 219 characters. After some observations, i found that all the data is
converted into exactly double the length after this oracle patch update.
Please help.
Thanks.

Hello,
Which is your NLS for your SAP and the external databases?
SELECT VALUE FROM V$NLS_PARAMETERS WHERE PARAMETER = 'NLS_CHARACTERSET';
What is your DBCO Conn. Info field?
What is the result if you set the remote connection in DBCO as per SAP note [808505|http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/808505]?
Regards,
Eduardo Rezende

Unicode Kernel Patch Update

Hi,
I want to Update the Unicode kernel patch of my ECC 6.0 system.
Since ,there is no run folder in a Unicode system,how do we go about it.
Since downtime on a Production system is a huge constraint,I dont want to mess up things.
Please help.
Thanks,
saba.

Hi,
Check this links
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/go/km/docs/library/webas/s-u/sp8%20downloading%20the%20patches/index.htm">Click here</a>
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/go/km/docs/library/webas/s-u/sp8%20kernel%20copy/index.htm">Click here</a>
Kind Regards
Umesh K

Backup fail after kernel patches updated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for