Backward Pricing after posting GR for Dairy Indistry

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario similar to Dairy or Live stock industry which SAP has already laid down in which the PO is updated with new price based on the Results of Quality Characteristics
for eg. If Quality Characteristics is Specific Gravity & its withing Specification, then corresponding condition type is updated in PO based on the GR quantity (per 1000 kg for eg.) after posting GR or after Usage decision in QM Inspection Lot
I want to understand if we implement the same solution, how the PO is updated after GR. Is the price PB00 or Condition type is changed at each GR? What happens if we have multiple GRs for the same PO ? Can we still implement ERS for these POs ?
Kindly throw some light if someone has already implemented this scenario or done proof of Cocept
Thanks in Advance
SAMIR MISTRY

Hi Samir ,
Have you considered using the Price Date Control under the Condition Control tab in the PO?
As per the F1 help:
"Price Determination (Pricing) Date Control
Determines which date is to be used for price determination (pricing) purposes.
Use
Enter the key for the desired date.
If you choose the date of goods receipt, for example, a new price will be determined upon the arrival of the goods, causing  
the item to be revaluated at this time."
If you have multiple GRs for the same PO you can still use ERS processing, of course youll
have to run MRRL for each individual corresponding GR.
Hope this helps,
Adam.

Similar Messages

  • BADI / USER EXIT for MB01 - after posting GR.

    Hi,
    We have some requirement, where we need to create the Goods Issue using bdc after posting the GR in MB01. can anybody give the user exit / BADI for this.
    i have used BADI - MB_DOCUMENT_BADI : It is triggering while click on the Save button in the MB01, but it is calling before post the GR. the customization part should trigger after the GR post.
    Regards,
    Sree

    Hi Sree,
    Do it the other manner. Store the GR in a Z-table and do the BDC or use the BAPI as suggest Keshav in a periodic job, or call it with a job (OPEN_JOB, CLOSE_JOB,...) in a function module, always with the option IN UPDATE TASK. Think that you have the number of document in this BADI and you must wait some time (1, 2 or 5 seconds) until the database save all data.
    Be careful with this badi (MB_DOCUMENT_BADI), see Note 92550 - Stock inconsistency due to customer enhancement (exit, BAdI) to understand the reasons.
    Regards,
    Eduardo
    Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Feb 2, 2011 2:20 PM

  • BADI for Vendor Invoice after Posting to send a mail to vendor

    Hi,
    My requirement Is like this.
    I have to send a mail to vendor after the Invoice for vendor is Posted.
    For dat I am searching for a badi to implement after the invoice is successfully posted.
    Please give some solution about this.
    Regards,
    Jyoti..

    if it is F-43 . check out the following
    BAdI Definition      Description                                                                               
    AC_QUANTITY_GET      Transfer of Quantities to Accounting - Customer Exit       
    BADI_ENJ_ALT_ADR     Go to alternative vendor/customer data                     
    BADI_F040_SCREEN_600 Screen Enhancement on F040 0600 Document Header            
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01   Screen Enhancement 1 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS02   Screen Enhancement 2 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS03   Screen Enhancement 3 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04   Screen Enhancement 4 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS05   Screen Enhancement 5 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_PRKNG_NO_UPDATE BAdI for Deactivating Update of Parked Documents           
    F050S008             FIDCC1, FIDCC2 Inbound IDoc: Update Comparison Ledger      
    FBAS_CIN_LTAX1F02    Tax interface                                              
    FBAS_CIN_MF05AFA0    EWT - Downpayment Clearing - Tax transfer for CIN          
    FI_AUTHORITY_ITEM    Extended Authorization Check for Document Display (FB03)   
    FI_GET_INV_PYMT_AMT  BAdI for determining the payment amount for an invoice     
    FI_HEADER_SUB_1300   Screen Enhancement for Document Header SAPMF05A            
    FI_PAYREF_BADI_010   BAdI: Payment Reference Number                             
    FI_TRANS_DATE_DERIVE Derive BKPF-WWERT from Other Document Header Data          
    INVOIC_FI_INBOUND    BADIs for Inbound IDoc INVOIC FI (Vendor Invoice)          
    RFESR000_BADI_001    BAdI for Own Processing of POR Item                        
    otherwise - find out the package of the program of the transaction.
    go to se84 - enhancements- business add ins - definitions - enter package and execute - you will see all the definations.

  • TS1424 can't download ny post after just paying for it on additional ipad

    I can't download ny post after just paying for it on additional ipad. Any idea how to fix?

    As long as you bought the current version of Aperture from the App Store you can download it as many time as you like without any additional cost.
    You need to make sure you use the same Apple ID when you log into the App Store as you used when you first purchased Aperture.
    good luck.

  • Capture and post excise for part goods after Goods receipt for an Import PO

    Hi ALL,
    We have  a scenario, client posted the goods receipt and invoice posted for an import PO
    Now client wants to post excise for part goods. I tried to capture excise by J1IEX with material document, system throwing error, "Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 1200059". I checked J1ID vendor excise details are maintained.
    We are using TAXINJ procedure. Please propose a solution for this issue.
    Regards,
    Murthy

    Hi,
    There are two vendors, main vendor and secondary vendor for import PO
    Main vendor for payment to material cost
    Secondary vendor for payment to Excise
    I maintained , ECC and exc ind vendor.
    I did J1I5 -- I updated RG23 part1
    and try to do J1IEX -- capture excise invoice with material doc, getting below error
    "PLA-AT2 amount 07.09.2010 is greater than available amount"
    Please advice
    Regards,
    Murthy

  • Posting keys for account determination for transaction EXC do not exist

    hi
    i am doing Sales order for 1 month,no error i have got
    but now i am getting error
    Posting keys for account determination for transaction EXD do not exist
    HELP

    There will not be any such postings called FI side / SD Side.
    Positng always done in Financial perspective only into Certain G/L accounts depends on configuration we did.
    As we know,
    To post Invoice Conditions in G/L accounts , we configure Account Determination . These tables will be communicated through Account keys maintained in Pricing procedure & in Account determination tables.
    To account the stock in Inventory, will configure the same in OBYC - FI/MM Account Determination.- this will be triggered through Movement type - Transaction key / General modifier / Valuation calss / Valution group code n other factors.
    In your issue,
              Which Postings you are referring to?
    In SO creation, Controlling documents will be created ( Ref: COPA - Controlling & Profitablity Analysis Customization)
    After PGI in Delivery: Inventory will accounted through OBYC settings
    After releasing invoice to Accounting, G/L accounts posted through VKOA settings.
    Hope ,now you provide exact information related to your query

  • STO - Excise tab not getting displayed in material document after posting.

    Dear all,
    We are facing an STO issue where in after we have done the receipt at the receiving plant with excise, the excise tab does not display in the GR material document.
    It is plant to plant stock transfer with excise, the process that we are following as given below:
    1) STO PO - ME21N
    2) Outbound delivery - VL10B - Post PGI in VL02N
    3) Outgoing excise invoice - J1IIN  - With the key DLFC.
    4) GR - MIGO with excise invoice capture.
    During GR posting in MIGO screen the system does display the excise tab, we enter the outgoing excise number and the corresponding values appear in BED, ECS and HCES. We post the GR material document.
    But after posting the material document if we display the same GR material document it does not show the excise invoice tab. And since we are not having part 1 entry number we are not able to post the part 2 entry in J1IEX.
    Request to please do let us know if we have missed out on any configuration or master data.
    Regards,
    mahesh.

    Hi,
    Do the all customization setting for CIN for reference check the following link for India. and Material management
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/BBlibrary_start.htm
    You have to maintain Excise master data for material,vendor and PLant in J1ID .
    reward if helpful,

  • Posting of cancelled Invoice after posting date is over

    Hello Experts,
    I am stuck up with a situation and as such seek your help.
    A invoice was generated and the subsequent accounting document was also cleared. Now after the posting date was over, someone cancelled the invoice by T.code VF11 and as expected it didnt get posted .The document flow showing is as per below :
    Order - open
    Invoice - completed
    Accounting Document - Cleared
    Cancel Invoice - Open
    Now, the business and their audit policies do not allow the client to cancel the invoice in back date ( within the posting period).
    What are the options do we have to tackle the situation.
    Joy

    The issue has been temporarily addressed by changing the posting date.
    However, now the client wants us to make an ABAP development so that no user is able to cancel the invoice after posting date is over. Now for that I have the following issues. Can someone please help me out in this.
    The basic process details I am following is as per below:
    For Transaction Code VF11 (i.e for Cancellation of Invoice) , when the invoice number which is subject to cancellation is provided, the System should search in VBRK table for the following :-
    1)The System will at first search whether the entry exists or not. If the Entry is not valid then it should give an message u201C Document xxxxx does not Existu201D.This is in line to the existing practice.
    2) If the Document number is valid then it will go to the billing date field and  will fetch the value from the VBRK table . Then it will match  whether the value fetched (i.e. this Invoice date)  is in present posting period or not. The system can find the posting period from the table V_T001B.
    a.If  the  Invoice date lies in the present posting period then the system will allow the cancellation document to be saved. This is in line to the existing process.
    b.If the Invoice date lies beyond the present posting period then the system will not allow to save the cancellation of the Invoice with a pop up message of u201C The Document number subject to cancellation do not lie within the present posting periodu201D .
    Now We have looked both the tables, from VBRK we will get Doc# and Billing date(FKDAT) but when we select Posting Date from table T001B( Permitted Posting Periods) there is some issue.
    1.  What will be the condition for selecting records from T001B table.Since there is multiple key fields
        RRCTY (Record Type) ,
        BUKRS (Posting Period Variant) ,
        MKOAR (Account Type or Masking)
        BKONT (To Account). 
    So, to get unique record what will be the value of this key fields. Is there any relationship with VBRK table ? 
    2.  Which field I have to consider as Posting Date or Period. Because there are many fields related to Posting period.

  • After working fine for several months, my iPhone 5 has started dropping bluetooth connectivity for 2 to 5 seconds at a time with my Sony MDR-1RBT headphones.  The headphones work fine with other devices.  I haven't moved to ios7 yet.  Any ideas?

    After working fine for several months, my iPhone 5 has started dropping bluetooth connectivity for 2 to 5 seconds at a time with my Sony MDR-1RBT headphones.  The headphones work fine with other bluetooth devices.  I haven't moved to iOS7 yet.  Any ideas?

    What user troubleshooting have you done on the phone? The steps are restart, reset, restore from backup, restore as new. Understand that a restore will put the latest iOS on your device. It is also possible there is a hardware fault on the device and the Bluetooth is failing. Anything is possible given the scenario you describe.
    And as far as iOS 7.x is concerned, we have 5 different iPhones here at home, all with the latest iOS, a 4, 4s, 5c, and 2-5s and all are working just fine. So, a blanket statement such as the one provided by the other poster is not completely true. Others are not having any issues at all either.

  • Error while posting confirmation for limit PO

    Hi Experts,
    we are having a standalone scenario(SRM 7) and the issue is as mentioned below
    The situation is that the PO is a limit order with 2 line items. The first line item is complete and has been closed off with the u201Cno further confirmation/invoiceu201D indicators selected. However the 2nd line still has some limit remaining but the when the central confirmations attempts to enter a good receipt against the line they get an error message which is "No Confirmation could be entered for purchase order"
    please guide me how to solve this.
    regards
    smita

    Hi,
    please find furhte information.
    a limit sc is created for a value of 37000 GBP and after approval it created a PO. but the user went and added a line item directly in PO for 40000 GBP. Now the total value of SC is 77000 GBP.
    user has created a confirmation for 36000GBP and selected no confirmation required further.there is no issues with this lin item
    but with the second line item he posted confimation for value 37000 gbp and invoiced for 30000 GBP.
    when i am trying to post confirmation for 3000 GBP system is throwing an error that "no confirmation could be entered for purchase order"
    could any one guide me how to solve this or any suggestions for solving this.
    regards
    smita

  • Error in :Posting keys for account determination

    Hi, Gurus,
          please suggest the solution for the following problem.
                we are selling two  types of materials, one is the  product material and the second one is the scrap material.Different type pricing procedures, sale order,delivery and billing types were configured for the same. For CST and VAT   same condition type  :"ZCST - for CST " and  ZVAT - for VAT" were used in both pricing procedure and the standard account keys : MW1 for ZCST and MWS for ZVAT  and  same G/L accounts configured .
    .                                                   key combination for the condition types as mentioned below:
    .                                                        ZCST:  Country/PlntRegion/Region/TaxCl2Cust/TaxCl.2Mat
                                                             ZVAT: Country/PlntRegion/Region/TaxCl1Cust/TaxCl.Mat
         Now we want to capture  CST and VAT seperately for both the materails.For that two new account keys created and incorporated the same in scrap pricing procedure and  and new  G/Ls created and assigned .Now the system is throwing  following error while while releasing the billing document to accounting document.
    Posting keys for account determination for transaction Z48 do not exist
    Message no. F5598
    here Z48 is the new accounting key created for  the  CST tax.We tried all the possibilities, but system is throwing the same error.
    with regards
    sam

    Thank u for ur response.Now it is solved when OB40 and OBCN maintained.Here I am facing a new problem.pl. provide the solution.we configured twoseperate  pricing procedures for our product and scrap material.We have configured same condition types for VAT(ie.condition type:ZVAT) and CST(cond type:ZCST), in both pricing procedures. Now We want to maintain  seperate condition types for VAT and CST for pricing procedure for Product material and Scrap material. I have created two new condition types for scrap sales ZSCT- cst for scrap and ZSVT-vat for scrap by copying the same from existing conditions ZCST & ZVAT, and the same is included in the scrap pricing procedure. And also maintained OB40,OBCN,OVK1,OVK3,OVK4, FTXP,FV11 and VK11.
    now I am facing the following problems.
    1. while creating the Material master & customer master, in tax category sub screen all conditions i.e. conditions defined for  product material( ZCST,ZVAT) and defined for scrap material (ZSCT, ZSVT) displaying and these are compulsory fields.
    2. While creating the sale order for scrap material, system is considering the TAX classes from ZVAT/ ZCST (defined for product material) and taking the condition value from the condition type ZSVT/ ZSCT with the TAX class values of  ZVAT/ZCST.
    Now I would like to know is there any procedure  to assign the Material type and Customer group to Tax category.
    Thanks & Regards
    sam

  • Goods Receipt after Completion Confirmation for Service Order

    Hi,
    We have a scenario in which a Notification is used to create a Sales Order & a Service Order using the action button.
    The Sales Order has a old/used product as a line item which we will consume along with some other new parts(added in the components tab in Service Order) to make a remanufactured product which we will obtain after using IW42 for Completion Confirmation. (The Service order is to carry the cost of refabrication/refurburishment & additional parts as well)
    We need to do Goods receipt of this remanufactured product to bring it into stock so that we can deliver the same using the same sales order.
    Is this possible? We have tried using Refurbishment order both CS/PM but have not been successful in inwarding the remanufactured product using IW8W.
    Kindly do suggest possibility of using a Service Order(created through a notification) with a GR feature for the above process of inwarding. Any alternate suggestions would also be very helpful.
    If this functionality can be achieved with some enhancement(custom exit, BADI etc) & some amongst you have worked on something similar , please do share your valuable inputs
    Thanks & Best Wishes
    Vishal

    Hi
    I dont think you will be able to do Goods receipt against prodcution order using inbound delivery VL31N. Inbound deliveries are normally created for Purchase orders and then GR can be posted wrt to the inbound delivery.
    Prod order is normally within warehouse only so you can use MB31 and post GR directly against Prod order.
    If you can explain more about your scenario hope we may help
    Please let us know
    thanks

  • Error in  BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE with movement type *261'  after posting

    Hi All,
    After sucessfull posting of  BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE  with movement type *261' .
    After posting ,while checking In mb51 document exists for it but checking in mmbe stock not reduced from resisticted stock.
    Can you kindly tell the import parameter to be filled to over come this error.
    Thank you.
    Thanks,
    AMS

    Hi Himanshu/ Tejaswini Khante / Madhu,
    Thank you all for your kind reply.
    @Himanshu....I have tried with LWA_ITEM-STCK_TYPE = BLANK, Still it didnt work.
    @Tejaswini Khante ...I checked the MMBE tcode, all the stocks are in 'Unrestricted use' only. The quality inspection, reserved fields are all blank. The materials are not Batch managed.
    @Madhu...Yes, i discussed with the Functional, yet to find a possible solution.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rajesh

  • Preflight keeps saying  "Unable to save the PDF File after post processing"

    I'm at a loss how to overcome this. Spent almost a whole day, together with another person, trying to fix it with no success!
    I use Adobe pro CC on a PC
    I usually receive pdf files from this one client who edits and formats a book in Mac Pages. Up until a few days ago I had no problems converting the client's pdfs into pdf/x3, but the last three versions of the latest file have stumped me.
    Just to test, I first just tried to convert the file (33MB), unchanged, to pdf/x3 using the save as other option - message reads  "the document has been saved, however, it could not be converted according to the selected standard profile: convert to PDF/X. Please use preflight with the profile "Convert to PDF/X" in order to identify those properties of the document which prevent it from being compliant to this profile"
    if I then choose under Profiles - convert to PDF/X3 - it says no problems found, and appears to have saved the file. If I try to save again as a pdf/x3, just to make sure, it then tells me it's not pdf/x3 compliant
    OK - so then I go back to preflight - and choose the standards function - then pdf/x3, then continue with the default colour profile. About halfway through the conversion, at the point of saving the file,  I get the message "unable to save the pdf file after post processing"
    So far I've had no luck figuring out what this is.
    I then choose the option of "verify compliance of ppdf/x3" - message reads "pdf/x3 version key (GTS_PDFXVersion) missing", and "Trapped key not true or false"
    Help!! How can I be sure the file converted / or not?
    kim

    Yes I was/am aware of Preflight's inability to play nicely over cloud technologies in certain cases, especially wrt Standards technologies, this will be partially addressed in an upcoming version of Preflight without saying too much.  But the same thing could theoretically have happened if the file was also located on another local network client or server.  Leaving aside the argument that this may violate the Acrobat User Agreement - since purchasing the software, the user agrees to employ its functionality on a single host system and precludes host-client-based scenarios - this simply is not a supported use, meaning the user may not have expectations that it will work at all, if the applications requirements are not observed.  There do exist server-solutions for Preflight files within networks, but Acrobat and by extension Acrobat Preflight is not one of those solutions, and (still) belongs in the single host-based desktop environment.
    However most (99.9%) functions within Acrobat <-> acrobat.com file exchange are supported, file syncing across multiple devices will soon be supported, but Standards compliance is still admittedly a problem at this point.  Some testing has been done using 3rd party cloud technologies starting with enterprise-based solutions, such as Office 365, and this will continue to ramp up to include other 3rd party products.
    As for the second point, Preflight will usually change the PDF version to be complaint, are you saying that it was unable to do so in this case?  It seems that this error should have popped up during the normal Preflight conversion attempt.  Personally I think solving a workflow problem using the print path is a little bit of a heavy-handed approach, but if helped and the results are acceptable, then that is good.  Since that path is non-existent on a Mac, as one needs to Save as Adobe PDF from the Print dialog's PDF drop-down menu, I am assuming your workflow involved file creation on a Mac, then further processing on Windows using the PDF printer.  I am wondering if a simple resave/Save As... to PDF with overwrite on a Mac, or Preflighting the file using a PDF version compatibility profile before the PDF/X conversion would have helped.  Since there are such a multitude of methods that a PDF can be created, there are also many ways within Acrobat that a user can shape the file to be compatible with the expected workflow, ie, 'many ways to skin a cat', without being morbid.

  • Possibility to register Pre-/Post-Procedures for an SQL Template Handler

    I would appreciate to see the possibility to register pre-/post-procedures for an SQL template handler in ORDS 3.0.
    Why:
    We use Oracle VPD/Row-Level-Security to secure data access. Hence a trigger sets a couple of attributes in the database session context at login time which are then used in static RLS predicates to limit which records the user can see/modify.
    With ORDS 3.0 all sessions are opened under the same technical user (e.g. APEX_REST_PUBLIC_USER), hence all users have the same/no attributes in the session context and could see/modify all data.
    To avoid this situation, I need to set the attributes (e.g. the authenticated user) in the database session context before the actual query/plsql handler is executed.
    Also, resetting the session context after the handler is executed would be good.
    This scenario is in line with scenarios 'One Big Application User' and 'Web-based applications' in http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/network.111/b28531/vpd.htm#DBSEG98291.
    Different solution approach:
    Kris suggested to write a PL/SQL handler where the pre-procedure is called before the business logic procedure/query. This is ok for me as long as I modify data and only need to return no or little data.
    As soon as I need to return a lot of data (e.g. select c1, c19, c30 from t1), this approach will force me to write a lot of code in the PL/SQL handler in order to marshal the c1, c19 and c30 to JSON and put it in the HTTP response.
    But this is the beauty of ORDS - I can simply define a template, write a GET SQL Handler 'select c1, c19, c30 from t1'  and have the data available as REST service, without writing any code to write JSON marshaled data in the HTTP response.

    I tried to log the request at Oracle REST Data Services (ORDS) but I could only start a new discussion: Possibility to register Pre-/Post-Procedures for an SQL Template Handler
    As I mentioned there, the PL/SQL handler approach works for me as long as I have no or only little data to send back to the client (e.g. put/post/delete succeeded or an error message why the call failed).
    If I need to return a lot of data from the PL/SQL handler I would need to, as far as I understand, to marshal the data to JSON and write it to the response body in the PL/SQL handler.
    I don't want to do the marshaling, because ORDS does it better.
    However, this works for me:
    I write a pipelined stored procedure that takes as input the attributes I need to set in the session context. I then can reference it in the SQL handler:
    select * from table(my_pipelined_function(:USER, ....)
    Now the JSON/HTTP response is created by ORDS again.
    I still needed to code a couple of lines, but it is way better than duplicating the functionality already existing in ORDS.
    With the hooks it would be perfect because I would not have to write any code (apart from the procedure to set the session context attributes), just configure the REST services in ORDS.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Voicemail Not Working (Again)

    I switched to Verizon about a year ago and have had repeated problems with my voicemail failing to work.  I will set it up and it will indicate it is working and then without notice I get an email or phone call from someone that tells me that they ha

  • Safari quitting problem

    For a few days now everytime I open up one of my twitter accounts Safari quits immediately, doesn't happen with other account. Anyone experienced similar problem?

  • What is an ageing report? What are the data sources used to develop an agin

    Hello BW gurus, I was going thru some of the BW resumes. I could not understand some of the points mentioned below. Kindly go thru them and please explain each of it. Thank you. TR. •     Developed AR ageing report, created invoice layout and process

  • Guitar and USB SB Live! 24-bit Exter

    Hallo all, I was eager to buy the aforementioned SB model (USB SB Li've! 24-bit External) as my laptop doesn't seem to get any input from my guitar through the embedded sound card. I was wondering, as this is the primary and only reason for me to buy

  • Can I change the record an EJB points to from within the bean?

    I have a problem which I hope someone can help with. I'm programming an EJB application which references several 'price list' type tables. An order will contain several option selections, which reference options, which each have an associated price.