BADI authentication check

You can't create a class that inherites from CL_HRPAD00AUTH_CHECK_STD, because this class is already final.
It should be another way to implement a BADI that checks authentication without skipping system authentication.
Any ideas?

Created as a seperate post from Badi - it is better to ask your own question than to respond to an old one.
matt

Similar Messages

HSRP Bad Authentication

Hi,
I'm having the following message almost continously:
%STANDBY-3-BADAUTH: Bad authentication from 103.226.1.249, remote state Init
I have double checked the config and there's no authentication configured in neither of the switches of this HSRP group. Config is the following:
SWITCH1:
interface Vlan2
ip address 31.226.1.249 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 200.4.163.249 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 103.226.1.249 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 103.197.4.3
ip helper-address 47.193.27.3
no ip redirects
standby 2 ip 103.226.1.1
standby 2 ip 31.226.1.1 secondary
standby 2 ip 200.4.163.1 secondary
standby 2 priority 120
SWITCH 2:
interface Port-channel1.2
encapsulation dot1Q 2
ip address 31.226.1.246 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 200.4.163.246 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 103.226.1.246 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 103.197.4.3
ip helper-address 47.193.27.3
no ip redirects
no ip directed-broadcast
standby 2 priority 130 preempt
standby 2 ip 103.226.1.1
standby 2 ip 31.226.1.1 secondary
standby 2 ip 200.4.163.1 secondary
This is the result of sh standby brief for switch 2:
Po1.2 2 130 P Active local 103.226.1.249 103.226.1.1
And this for switch 1:
Interface Grp Prio P State Active Standby Virtual IP
Vl2 2 120 Standby 103.226.1.246 local 103.226.1.1
The device which complains of this error is cisco Cat4232L3 with IOS 12.0(7)W5(15b). Despite I'm pretty sure this is a bug, I have found nothing in the Bug Toolkit...
What do you think?
Regards,
Ruben

Ruben
I do not see a problem with the part of the config that you posted. And the show standby indicates that HSRP is working (at least switch 2 knows that it is active and switch 1 knows that it is standby). I do not know if the full output of show standby would show anything else useful.
If standby is working and you are getting these error messages then it does sound like a bug. If you want to investigate further, it might be helpful to run debug for HSRP and see if it indiates anything. And of course opening a case with TAC is the ultimate way to find if it is a bug.
HTH
Rick

User exit or a badi for checking the vendor email id in me22n on me29n

hi all,
can anybody suggest me a user exit or a badi for checking the email id of the vendor in me21n or me22n or me29n.
i.e. a user exit or a BADI which gets hit either at the time of creation or release of a purchase order.
plz suggest me a solution its urgent.
regards,
santosh

Hi Santosh,
Have you looked BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST or user exits EXIT_SAPMM06E_016 / EXIT_SAPMM06E_017?
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto
Please reward points if helpful.

Supress authentication check from within ABAP code

Hi,
we want all users to update their email-address in their own sap profile. (a self service)
By default, in the screen "System"->"User Profile"->"Own Data", he can update all except his email-id.
For this, we have written an abap report.
DATA: p_smtp TYPE TABLE OF bapiadsmtp WITH HEADER LINE,
 p_return TYPE TABLE OF bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE,
 p_addressx TYPE bapiaddr3x.
data: p_uname TYPE xubname.
PARAMETERS: p_email TYPE ad_smtpadr OBLIGATORY.
 p_uname = sy-uname. "logged in user
 p_smtp-e_mail = p_email.
 p_smtp-std_no = 'X'.
 p_smtp-home_flag = 'X'.
 p_smtp-consnumber = '001'.
 p_addressx-e_mail = 'X'.
 CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_USER_CHANGE'
 EXPORTING
 username = p_uname
 addressx = p_addressx
 TABLES
 return = p_return
 addsmtp = p_smtp.
when we execute this report, with all rights, it works fine.
but a normal user when he executes, he is getting this error:
"You are not authorized to change users in group"
the su53 screen shows:
 Authorization check failed
Object Class BC_A Basis: Administration
 Authorization Obj. S_USER_GRP User Master Maintenance: User Groups
 Authorization Field ACTVT Activity
 02
 Authorization Field CLASS User group in user master maintenance
 <Dummy>
the point here is we cannot add User Maintenance rights to all our normal users.
is there any way, within the report (code) we can suppress the authentication check, programatically just while calling 'BAPI_USER_CHANGE', so that the user will be able to update his email-id.
thanks in advance,
Madhu_1980

Here are 2 useful links:
http://www.sapdev.co.uk/fmodules/fms_updateaddress.htm
Updating email address in SU1/SU3
If these don't help the noly thing I can suggest is that you write your own bdc program.
Regards,
Warren.

ME31K BADI for checking Data in Commitment Plan/ Acct assignment

I am trying to find a BADI or User Exit to check Account Assignment / Commitment Plan Data, to work in TCodes ME31k or ME32K.
I tried using ME_PROCESS_OUT_CUST , But its only for BAPI.
Any Similar BADI to check in ME31K or ME32K.
Appricate any help

alex ice wrote:
Hi.
> 'Can we do any derivation or check to get the account assignment populated automatically in the Commitment Plan ?
> Account assignments screens are avaliable in the commitment plan so i think we dont want to apply this note.'-i don't think so, because as said in this note it's coding error.
Thank you. I will impliment the Corrections
>
> 'We have alaready activated the Fields to be transferred. I dont have a clue where we will set the account assignemnt specifically for contracts (in the case of PR and PO it comes automatically as per the derivation rule mainted)'-it derives not from contract,but from Earmarked fund,which generates from Com. plan.
Ok.Then i think some issue in the Earmarked fund.. How we can check this. Please guide.
>
> 'One more error : While running transaction FM_MRP_PR if the budget exceed the PR not pupulating the account assignment filed (if it is in the budget it is populating) and we are getting error message "Instance 10000120 of object type Purchase Requisition could not be changed ,Message no. BAPI003" Please advice how we can overcome this error.' when you get this error(also put it's number), if while changing, then check PR item number,if it's=0 then customize in OMI5
Message is PR No "10000120 10 Annual budget exceeded by 560,400.00 QAR (FM PB Availability Control) for document item 00010 ,
"Instance 10000120 of object type Purchase Requisition could not be changed ,Message no. BAPI003"
I have checked transaction OMI5 and Plant with Item PR 10 and Item no stock trans Res is 100. and hope this is correct.
Please Guide.
Regards
Hari

"Bad Authentication" when pop or smtp with Verizon e-mail using Evolution

I'm using Evolution 3.2.3 as my e-mail client.
It's worked with literally every ISP and mail service other than Verizon.
I followed the instructions on the Verizon support e-mail client setup:
Incoming mail server (POP3): pop.verizon.net
Incoming Server Port Numbers: 995
Outgoing mail server (SMTP): smtp.verizon.net
Outgoing Server Port Numbers: 465 Why is this important?
Make sure SSL encryption is enabled for the incoming and outgoing mail server.
But if I try to receieve or send e-mail I always get a "Bad authentication response from server" error.
Has anyone ever got Evolution to work with Verizon?
I searched and it seemed to work up until the year 2013.

For the sake of example, we are going to pretend that we are setting up fictional account "[email protected]" and the password for logging into that account in webmail is "fakepassword" - Again, this is a fictitious account for the sake of an example.
The settings for using Verizon's servers would be:
Incoming Server: pop.verizon.net
Server Requires Authentication: Yes
Username: fakeacct
Password: fakepassword
Requires a Secure Connection (SSL): Yes
Port: 995
Outgoing Server: smtp.verizon.net
Server Requires Authentication: Yes (You can set it to use the same settings as incoming, or manually enter the username and password.)
Requires a Secure Connection (SSL): Yes
Port: 465
If you are given the option anywhere for Secure Password Authentication (SPA), set it to No, Normal, Plain, etc. - This can also be listed as "Authentication type" in some clients.
These settings should work unless you have a Verizon/Yahoo account, in which case the server names are: incoming.yahoo.verizon.net -and- outgoing.yahoo.verizon.net
If all of that is set up and it's still not working, your best bet is to provide a screenshot of your settings (with personal information blocked/removed) and any errors you are getting.
If a forum member gives an answer you like, give them the Kudos they deserve. If a member gives you the answer to your question, mark the answer as Accepted Solution so others can see the solution to the problem.
"All knowledge is worth having."

522 IP REPUTATION BAD (please check for IP address...

Hello,
We are a big hosting provider within the UK with multiple servers and thousands of hosted websites.
We have recently migrated a shared hosting server to new hardware and a new set of IPv4 IP addresses (freshly assigned by RIPE).
Customers hosted on this new server are trying to send emails to @btinternet and @btopenworld mailboxes using our smtp email server but they receive a bounce back stating "522 IP REPUTATION BAD (please check for IP address listing on reputation services)"
I have checked our shared IP address that is used to send email and it comes back squeeky clean!
What I need help with is who can I speak to to find out why our IP address was blocked and how to go about getting it removed again.
I tried BT's automated telephone service who put me through the the broadband team - They were helpful but kept giving me new numbers of departments I needed to phone which sent me on a wild goose chase returning me back to the same department again.
There must be a BT Yahoo email postmaster department I can get ahold / speak to regarding this...
Any help or advise please?

I am also getting this error today when I wasn't getting it yesterday sending from and to the same email addresses from the same location I now get the error
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection:
host mx.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.49]: 522 IP REPUTATION BAD (please check for IP address listing on reputation services)
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path:
Received: from [93.157.219.252] (helo=[192.168.1.56])
by mx1uk.supremebox.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from )
id 1VMvWR-0002So-Gl
for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:53:04 +0400
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.6.130613
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:53:00 +0100
if i try to send from by bt account to the bt account i get this error
Your message has not been sent as you are accessing your email over an unsecure or untrusted connection. Visit www.bt.com/emailcodes for advice on using secure connections.

Badi for check tax number field

Hi guys!
Can anyone tell if exists a badi that ckecks the field 'TAXNUM' in transaction 'BP' after we put a value there.
I've already check in the transaction 'Bus7' and i only find the function for the event 'check before saving' -'BUP_BUPA_EVENT_DCHCK'.
Thanks in advance.
Hugo.

Hi everybody!
I need understand how implement check of taxnum using transaction BUS3 - view BUTX01.
I need check tax number in transaction FPP2.
I see a post very interesting:
Badi for check tax number field
I create a module function but inside of module function i don't have data for my validation. I think i make a mistake. Help please!
If somebody have a tutorial would be great!!
Thanks!

Pavilion a1240n Bad BIOS Check Sum Starting Bios recovery

I have a Pavilion a1240n when i turn on the computer the first screen that comes up says Bad BIOS check Sum starting BIOS recovery
Checking for floppy...
Floppy not found!
Checking for CD ROM....
CD ROM not found!
Checking for Floppy...
Floppy not found!
It does this continuously and I cant get pass the screen any Ideas on what could be the problem and how I can solve this issue
Thank you in advance

Hi,
I have a Media Centre PC M7260In. I started the PC after many days. Now while i start the PC it shows the Error as below.
Bad Bios Checksum, Starting Bios Recovery
Checking for Floppy
Floopy Not Found
Check for CD-Rom
CD-Rom Not Found
I already done the procedure as per link.
1.Remove the Battery
2. Change Jumper setting without Power Cord and reset as default.
No Change Please Help
Thanks & Regards,
Shiju

A distribution group with "require all senders are authenticated" checked still receives external mail

a distribution group with "require all senders are authenticated" checked still receives external mail. this does not happen for any other DG i am aware of. this also happens from multiple external senders.
please assist.
thanks

Hi,
From your description, I would like to verify if the problematic Distribution Group is a member of other distribution groups that don't check "require all senders are authenticated".
What's more, please check if there is any difference between this problematic distribution group and other normal distribution groups.
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

BADI for check tax numbers in BP

Hi,
I need a BADI for check that the user pick two types of tax numbers (ES0 and ES1) in BP when createa a new IC.
All BADIs that I find only execute on update and don't send exception.
Anyone can I help me??
Thanks

Thanks Micheal
but I need some additional information.
I need to know how to get an error message in the function module I created.
Thanks a lot

BADI to check and update field in transaction BP through WEB UI

Hi,
I have this requirement to check certain data from BUT000 and based on this update the Search term field in BUT000.
I am using Badi BUPA_GENERAL_UPDATE.
I am also able to retrieve the current value in BUT000 using function module
CALL FUNCTION 'BUPA_GENERAL_CALLBACK'
 TABLES
 et_but000_old = t_but000_old
 et_but000_new = t_but000_new.
My requirement is to update a field in BUT000 in memory.
If I was to use transaction BP in CRM then simply I can modify the value using
ASSIGN ('(SAPLBUD0)MEM_BUT000[] into <Field_symbol>
But the issue is that when called through the WEB UI I cannot access this memory.
Can any one suggest me a Function Module or some method by which I can change the value of BUT000 in memory while saving.
Awaiting your quick suggestions.
Regards,
Taher

Hi Sidd,
I figured out another way to do this.
FIELD-SYMBOLS <fs> TYPE ANY TABLE.
DATA : ws_bus000_i TYPE bus000___i.
FIELD-SYMBOLS <fs2> TYPE bus000___i.
IF sy-tcode = 'BP'.
 ASSIGN ('(SAPLBUD0)MEM_BUT000[]') TO <fs>.
 IF <fs> IS ASSIGNED.
 LOOP AT <fs> ASSIGNING <fs2>.
 IF <fs2> IS ASSIGNED.
 IF <fs2>-partner_guid = ws_but000-partner_guid.
 <fs2>-bu_sort1 = 'BP'.
 ENDIF.
 ENDIF.
 ENDLOOP.
 ENDIF.
 UNASSIGN : <fs>, <fs2>.
ELSEIF sy-tcode IS INITIAL.
 ASSIGN ('(SAPLBUD_MEM)gt_but000_mem[]') TO <fs>.
 IF <fs> IS ASSIGNED.
 LOOP AT <fs> ASSIGNING <fs2>.
 IF <fs2> IS ASSIGNED.
 IF <fs2>-partner_guid = ws_but000-partner_guid.
 <fs2>-bu_sort1 = 'WEB UI'.
 ENDIF.
 ENDIF.
 ENDLOOP.
 ENDIF.
 UNASSIGN : <fs>, <fs2>.
ENDIF.
on debugging I could figure out the program containing the data in the memory.
Before the save I accessed this program and updated the parameter as required.
Also For transaction BP this program is not available but there is another program so there is an if else based on the sy-tcode.
I need to check for other BP transactions as well but as of now this seems good.
Kindly suggest.
Taher.

Code of ME_process_cust_Po BADI for checking item data?

Hi all,
While users are creating new PO in ME21N, I have to check the condition records for the Materials they entered.
If the condition record is not maintained for the respective material The creation of PO while saving it , should not be allowed and a message should be displayed.
Please mention the respective method and code to do this?
Thanks
Vamshi.

Hi ,
this is the sample code for Item check, by using mm_messages_mac(include u can raise error msg based on the INFNR(info record) field.
DATA: ls_mepoitem TYPE mepoitem,
        ls_customer TYPE mepo_badi_exampl,
        ls_tbsg     TYPE tbsg.
INCLUDE mm_messages_mac. "useful macros for message handling
here we check customers data*
ls_mepoitem = im_item->get_data( ).
IF ls_mepoitem-loekz EQ 'D'.
a physical deletion of the item was carried out. therrefor we have to*
delete customer data on the level of the item*
    ls_customer-ebeln = ls_mepoitem-ebeln.
    ls_customer-ebelp = ls_mepoitem-ebelp.
    CALL FUNCTION 'MEPOBADIEX_SET_DATA'
      EXPORTING
        im_data                    = ls_customer
        im_physical_delete_request = 'X'.
ELSE.
update/insert operation*
    CALL FUNCTION 'MEPOBADIEX_GET_DATA'
      EXPORTING
        im_ebeln = ls_mepoitem-ebeln
        im_ebelp = ls_mepoitem-ebelp
      IMPORTING
        ex_data = ls_customer.
check customers data*
check field badi_bsgru. This should be carried out only for new items. Once the PO is posted the*
field should no longer be changeable. This is done in Method FIELDSELECTION_ITEM.*
    IF im_item->is_persistent( ) EQ mmpur_no.
      IF ls_customer-badi_bsgru IS INITIAL.
Place the cursor onto field badi_bsgru. The metafield was defined in BAdI ME_GUI_PO_CUST,*
Method MAP_DYNPRO_FIELDS.*
        mmpur_metafield mmmfd_cust_01.
        mmpur_message_forced 'W' 'ME' '083' text-002 '' '' ''.
      ELSE.
check whether the field is valid*
        *SELECT SINGLE * FROM tbsg INTO ls_tbsg WHERE bsgru EQ ls_customer-badi_bsgru.*
        IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
          mmpur_metafield mmmfd_cust_01.
          mmpur_message_forced 'E' 'ME' '083' text-004 '' '' ''.
invalidate the object*
          CALL METHOD im_item->invalidate( ).
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
check field badi_afnam*
    IF ls_customer-badi_afnam IS INITIAL.
      mmpur_metafield mmmfd_cust_02.
      mmpur_message_forced 'W' 'ME' '083' text-003 '' '' ''.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
regards
Prabhu

Exit\badi for check MR8M transaction BUDAT field

hello expert,
I must check the field RBKP_V-BUDAT of the MR8M transaction. there is a user-exit\badi to do it?
thanks in advance.

Yes, it's custom, below is the documentation :
HY SIMGINVOICE_UPDATE
Interface name : IF_EX_INVOICE_UPDATE.
method IF_EX_INVOICE_UPDATE~CHANGE_AT_SAVE
Use
You can use the business add-in (INVOICE_UPDATE) to further process the
    following functions or, if necessary, forbid them:
o   Creating invoices (invoices, credit memos, subsequent debits,
        subsequent credits) in Logistics Invoice Verification
o   Parking documents in Logistics Invoice Verification, and making
        changes to these documents, for example, deleting them
Standard settings
The business add-in is not active in the standard system.

BADI - WORKORDER_GOODSMVT - check for BATCH management

Hi there,
I have implemented WORKORDER_GOODSMVT BADI (Backflush method) to fill the batch number with a default value for a given plant.
This is working fine.
However, I only want to fill this if the Material in the Production Order is "batch managed" (at the moment it's happening for all materials in the Prod. Order ). This indicator field does not appear to be available in the structures of the BADI.
If I look in CO02 for the order, I can see a column called BATCH which is filled with an 'X' in certain cases.
An F1 on the screen field says that it is 'RESBD-SPLKZ'
However, if I check RESB table (or read RESBD using a function module) , this SPLKZ field is always blank for the given order.
Does anyone have an idea why this is, or where I can find a proper "Batch Indicator" field?
All suggestions appreciated.
I have searched forums and can't find relevant solution.
Thanks,
David.

Hi Bruce,
I solved the problem by going to MARC table with material and plant, and checking field MARC-XCHPF ('Batch management requirement indicator').
if this field was set to 'X', I made my change to the CHARG field.
Hopefully this helps you.
this is from a long time ago, I should have updated the post sooner - will mark as solved now.
thanks,
David

BADI authentication check

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for