BADI having multiple enhancement implementations

Hi,
The requirement is to have multiple implementations of a BADI. In the program i have to call each of the implementations of this specific BADI.
Is this how to do it.
1. Firstly i just know the enhacement spot details like the BADI name and the interface name. With this information i want to find all the enhancement implementations that exists for the given BADI name or interface name.
I tried the following method, but does not seem to work.
CALL METHOD cl_exit_master=>create_obj_by_interface_filter
EXPORTING
    inter_name                = 'IF_SSP_USER_SETTINGS'
   method_name               =
   flt_val                   =
   internal                  = SXRT_FALSE
   caller                    =
   delayed_instance_creation = SXRT_FALSE
IMPORTING
    exit_obj_tab              = lt_EXIT_OBJ_TAB
2. Once i get all the enhancement implementations, i want to call them one by one, i.e. a specific method of each of them.
Am i right in what i am doing given my requirement as stated above. If not, please direct me as to how i can achieve it.
Thanks and Regards,
Madhura Lobo

Arun,
Many thanks, and you're right about having different enhancement sets active, although you can control which enhancement set is active via the BADI COMPONENT...something...
However, in my case I shall remove the other two unused enhancement sets as this is just asking for trouble, if they remain.
I must admit I would like to see more control, perhaps a warning, to say that there is already an active enhancement set when you create a new one. This can easily happen when you have multiple developers on the project, of which some are junior.
Anyway, your time is much appreciated.
Jason

Similar Messages

Difference between Enhancement Implementation and BadI Implementation

What is the difference between Enhancement Implementation and BadI Implementation?

Hi Rajendra Prasad,
Enhancement spot : It is the point where you can add your code. It can have multiple implementations. All the implementations can active at a time but the sequence of executions of the implementations can be anything.
(or)
Enhancement points are regions where can insert our code to suit customer needs...Spots are subsets of points and created inside these points..for an enhancement point multiple active spots can exist.
For enhacement-sections : the main idea is to provide a spot to customise the existing process..eg:SAP has done a select criteria..but you need to filter it more by adding a where condition..in that case SAP suggests using Enhancement sections..At any time the first active enhancement section works...even if multiple sections are created(though ideally multiple sections are not allowed to be created)..if you do the procedure below you can see that enhancement-section when a spot is created for it...the code in the parent section is copied and given in the editable mode
Creating spots implementations for points/sections are given below................................................................
to Create a spot in the standard code...click on the spiral icon..screen changes to a different color...place cursor on ENHANCEMENT-POINT/ENHANCEMENT-SECTION keyword of the spot you require to create implementation for...righ click -> "enhancement implementation -> "create" -> a table control comes -> at the bottom "CREATE" button to be clicked" ...give a name and text in customer name space and save -> select the same name just given in the table control ..press 'Tick' .....you will get a space where code can be written..write the code.....save and activate
Also check the following blogs on enhancement framework
/people/thomas.weiss/blog/2006/01/24/what-the-new-enhancement-framework-is-for-150-its-basic-structure-and-elements-for-beginners
The new Enhancement Framework Part 2 - What Else You Need to Know Before Building an Enhancement
How To Define a New BAdI Within the Enhancement Framework - Part 3 of the Series
How to implement a BAdI And How to Use a Filter - Part 4 of the Series on the New Enhancement Framework
Source Code Enhancements - Part 5 of the Series on the New Enhancement Framework
Please go through this link also.
implicit enhancement and explicit enhancement
Reward points if it helps you
Cheers,
Swamy Kunche

Is it possibe to define a badi with multiple filters for single implementation ?

is it possible to have a badi with multiple filters in one implmentation?

Hello Siva,
There is no hierarchical concept in filter values. You can have multiple filter values and at any time you can pass only one filter value while invoking Badi.
The concept of hierarchy can be implemented by combination of filter and methods.
1. You can have filter as the first level and have multiple filters.
2. Then you can define methods in Badi and this now becomes 2 level.
Thanks and Regards,
Veera

Multiple active implementations for filter value EXEC_METHODCALL_PPF

Hi,
I have created an implementation for the EXEC_METHODCALL_PPF badi which is triggered from an action in a transaction.It is working fine in the development system but while transporting it to the quality system I am getting the following error.
Multiple active implementations for filter value EXEC_METHODCALL_PPF definition
Errors occurred during post-handling AFTER_IMP_SXCI for SXCI L
AFTER_IMP_SXCI belongs to package SECE
The errors affect the following components:
BC-DWB-CEX (Customer Enhancements)
When i refer to the documentation of the error message it says....
Multiple active implementations for filter value EXEC_METHODCALL_PPF definition
Message no. ENHANCEMENT474
Diagnosis
There are multiple active implementations of the same business add-in definition, even though this is not allowed.
System Response
This is not correct and should not occur.
Procedure
Deactivate the implementations active for this BAdI definition one by one until there is only one active implementation left.
You should use transaction SE18 (Utilities -> Adjustment -> Multiple-use interfaces) to solve these conflicts systematically.
But I am apprehensive if deactivating all the standard implemenatations of the badi will create any problem.Please can any one suggest as to how to resolve this issue....
Any help would be highly appreciated.

Hello,
Please check the following suggestions
a) go to se18 -> enter your definition name and see if "Multiple" call check box is ticked in Quality
b)compare your transports since some objects in development may not have found it's way to the quality server
c)Please see if for the same definition,for different filter values...implementations are done...if so,is multiple checkbox marked? in quality also?if you have multiple implementations with the check box not marked..the message conveys u cannot have multiple implementations of the same badi....
d)also check if the filter being passed to the BADI is ok
Hope it was useful in some way
Reward if helpful
Regards
Byju

Multiple Enhancement sets

Hi Experts,
What are the advantages/disadvanyages of multiple enhancements sets:
For example :
I am having two components 1. Component of lead 2. Component of opportunity.
I want to have2 different enhancement set for different component i.e ZLEAD for lead and ZOPPT for opportunity. So , my query is , Is it possible to have multiple enhancement sets in a client and what could be the advantage/disadvantage of doing this?
How I have to make entries in customizing table BSPWDV_EHSET_ASG , because I assume that we have to maintin only one enhancement set with respect to a client.
Please clear my doubts.
Help will be appreciated.
Best regards
Sourabh

Hi,
The same client can support different enhancement sets. This is likely done if you have some requirement that demands different enhancements based on user role/profile. To determine which enhancement to load when a user logs in, you can use the COMPONENT_LOADING BADI/Enhancement spot(New BADI).
Regards,
Arun Prakash

Having multiple problems with script - NTFS Permissions and AD Groups

Hi, all! I'm having multiple problems with my first script I've written with Powershell. The script below does the following:
1. Prompts the user for a corporate division under which a shared folder will be created, and adjusts variables accordingly.
2. Prompts if the folder will be a global folder or an office/location-specific folder, and makes appropriate adjustments to variables.
3. If a global folder, prompts for the name. If an office/location-specific folder, prompts for each component of the street address, city and state and an optional modifier. I've prompted for this information in this way because the information
is used differently later on in the script.
4. Verifies the entered information and requests confirmation to proceed.
5. Creates the folder.
6. Creates an AD OU and/or security group(s).
7. Applies appropriate security groups to the new folder and removes undesired permissions.
Import-Module ActiveDirectory
$Division = ""
$DivAbbr = ""
$OU = ""
$OUDrive = "AD:\"
$FolderName = ""
$OUName = ""
$GroupName = ""
$OURoot = "ou=DFS Restructure Testing OU,ou=Pennsylvania Camp Hill 4410 Industrial Park Rd,ou=Locations,ou=Camp Hill,dc=jacobsonco,DC=com"
$FSRoot = "E:\"
$FolderPath = ""
$DefaultFolders = "Archive","Customer Service","Equipment","Inbounds","Management","Outbounds","Processes","Projects","Quality","Reports","Returns","Safety","Schedules","Time Keeping","Training"
[bool]$Location = 0
do {
$userInput = Read-Host "Enter CLS Division: (W)arehousing, (S)taffing, or (P)ackaging"
Switch ($userInput)
W {$Division = "Warehousing"; $DivAbbr = "WHSE"; $OU = "ou=Warehousing,"; break}
S {"Staffing is not yet implemented."; break}
P {"Packaging is not yet implemented."; break}
default {"Invalid choice. Please re-enter."; break}
while ($DivAbbr -eq "")
write-host ""
write-host ($Division + " was selected.")
$FolderPath = $Division + "\"
write-host ""
$choice = ""
do {
$choice = Read-Host "Will this be a (G)lobal folder or (L)ocation folder?"
Switch ($choice)
G {$Location = $false; break}
L {$Location = $true; $FolderPath = $FolderPath + "Locations\"; $OU = "ou=Locations," + $OU; break}
default {"Invalid choice. Please re-enter."; $choice = ""; break}
while ($choice -eq "")
write-host ""
write-host ("Location is set to: " + $Location)
write-host ""
if ($Location -eq $false) {
$FolderName = Read-Host "Please enter folder name:"
$GroupName = $DivAbbr + " " + $FolderName
} else {
$input = Read-Host "Please enter two-letter state abbreviation:"
$FolderName = $FolderName + $input + " "
$input = Read-Host "Please enter city:"
$FolderName = $FolderName + $input + " "
$input = Read-Host "Please enter street address number only:"
$FolderName = $FolderName + $input
$GroupName = $DivAbbr + " " + $FolderName
$FolderName = $FolderName + " "
$input = Read-Host "Please enter street name:"
$FolderName = $FolderName + $input
$input = Read-Host "Please enter any optional information to appear in folder name:"
if ($input -ne "") {
$FolderName = $FolderName + " " + $input
$OUName = $FolderName
write-host
write-host "Path for folder: "$FSRoot$FolderPath$FolderName
write-host "AD Path: "$OUDrive$OU$OURoot
write-host "New OU Name: "$OUName
write-host -NoNewLine "New Security Group names: "$GroupName
if ($Location -eq $true) { write-host " and "$GroupName" MGMT" }
write-host
$input = Read-Host "Please confirm creation of new site/folder: (Y/N) "
if ($input -ne "Y") { Exit }
write-host
write-host -NoNewLine "Folder exists: "; Test-Path ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName)
if (Test-Path ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName)) {
Write-Host "Folder already exists! Skipping folder creation..."
} else {
write-host "Folder does not exist. Creating..."
new-item -path ($FSRoot + $FolderPath) -name $FolderName -itemtype directory
Set-Location ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName)
if ($Location -eq $true) {
$tempOUName = "ou=" + $OUName + ","
write-host
write-host $OUDrive$tempOUName$OU$OURoot
write-host
write-host -NoNewLine "OU exists: "; Test-Path ($OUDrive + $tempOUName + $OU + $OURoot)
if (Test-Path ($OUDrive + $tempOUName + $OU + $OURoot)) {
Write-Host "OU already exists! Skipping OU creation..."
} else {
write-host "OU does not exist. Creating..."
New-ADOrganizationalUnit -Name $OUName -Path ($OU + $OURoot) -ProtectedFromAccidentalDeletion $false
$GroupNameMGMT = $GroupName + " MGMT"
if (!(Test-Path ($OUDrive + "CN=" + $GroupName + "," + $tempOUName + $OU + $OURoot))) { write-host "Normal user group does not exist. Creating..."; New-ADGroup -Name $GroupName -GroupCategory Security -GroupScope Global -Path ("OU=" + $OUName + "," + $OU + $OURoot)}
if (!(Test-Path ($OUDrive + "CN=" + $GroupNameMGMT + "," + $tempOUName + $OU + $OURoot))) { write-host "Management user group does not exist. Creating..."; New-ADGroup -Name $GroupNameMGMT -GroupCategory Security -GroupScope Global -Path ("OU=" + $OUName + "," + $OU + $OURoot)}
$FolderACL = get-acl ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName)
$FolderACL.SetAccessRuleProtection($True,$True)
# $FolderACL.Access | where {$_.IdentityReference -eq "BUILTIN\Users"} | %{$FolderACL.RemoveAccessRuleAll($_)}
$BIUsers = New-Object System.Security.Principal.NTAccount("BUILTIN\Users")
$BIUsersSID = $BIUsers.Translate([System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier])
write-host $BIUsersSID.Value
# out-string -inputObject $BIUsers
$Ar = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule($BIUsersSID.Value,"ReadAndExecute,AppendData,CreateFiles,Synchronize","ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit", "None", "Allow")
$FolderACL.RemoveAccessRuleAll($Ar)
Set-ACL ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName) $FolderACL
get-acl ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName) | fl
$FolderACL = get-acl ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName)
$ADGroupName = "JACOBSON\" + $GroupName
$objUser = New-Object System.Security.Principal.NTAccount($ADGroupName)
$objUser.Translate([System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier]).Value
write-host $ADGroupName
write-host $objUser.Value
$Ar = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule($ADGroupName,"ReadAndExecute","ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit", "None", "Allow")
Out-String -InputObject $ar
$FolderACL.AddAccessRule($Ar)
$ADGroupName = "JACOBSON\" + $GroupNameMGMT
$Ar = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule($ADGroupName, "Modify", "ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit", "None", "Allow")
Out-String -InputObject $ar
$FolderACL.AddAccessRule($Ar)
Set-ACL ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName) $FolderACL
} else {
$tempOUName = "cn=" + $GroupName + ","
write-host
write-host $OUDrive$tempOUName$OU$OURoot
write-host
write-host -NoNewLine "Group exists: "; Test-Path ($OUDrive + $tempOUName + $OU + $OURoot)
if (Test-Path ($OUDrive + $tempOUName + $OU + $OURoot)) {
Write-Host "Security group already exists! Skipping new security group creation..."
} else {
write-host "Security group does not exist. Creating..."
New-ADGroup -Name $GroupName -GroupCategory Security -GroupScope Global -Path ($OU + $OURoot)
$FolderACL = get-acl ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName)
$ADGroupName = "JACOBSON\" + $GroupName
$FolderACL.SetAccessRuleProtection($True,$True)
$Ar = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule($ADGroupName,"Modify","ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit", "None", "Allow")
$FolderACL.AddAccessRule($Ar)
$FolderACL.Access | where {$_.IdentityReference -eq "BUILTIN\Users"} | %{$FolderACL.RemoveAccessRuleAll($_)}
Set-ACL ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName) $FolderACL
My problems right now are in the assignment/removal of security groups on the newly-created folder, and the problems are two-fold. Yes, I am running this script as an Administrator.
First, I am unable to remove the BUILTIN\Users group from the folder when this is an office/location-specific folder. I've tried to remove the group in several different ways, and none are having any effect. Oddly, if I type in the lines directly
into Powershell, they work as expected. I've tried the following methods:
$FolderACL = get-acl ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName)
$FolderACL.SetAccessRuleProtection($True,$True)
$FolderACL.Access | where {$_.IdentityReference -eq "BUILTIN\Users"} | %{$FolderACL.RemoveAccessRuleAll($_)}
Set-ACL ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName) $FolderACL
$FolderACL = get-acl ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName)
$FolderACL.SetAccessRuleProtection($True,$True)
$BIUsers = New-Object System.Security.Principal.NTAccount("BUILTIN\Users")
$BIUsersSID = $BIUsers.Translate([System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier])
$Ar = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule($BIUsersSID.Value,"ReadAndExecute,AppendData,CreateFiles,Synchronize","ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit", "None", "Allow")
$FolderACL.RemoveAccessRuleAll($Ar)
Set-ACL ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName) $FolderACL
In the first case, the script goes through and has no apparent effect because afterwards, I do a get-acl and the BUILTIN\Users group is still there, although when looking through the GUI, inheritance appears to have been broken from the parent folder.
In the second case, I get the following error message:
Exception calling "RemoveAccessRuleAll" with "1" argument(s): "Some or all identity references could not be translated."
At C:\Users\tesdallb\Documents\FileServerBuild.ps1:110 char:5
+ $FolderACL.RemoveAccessRuleAll($Ar)
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [], MethodInvocationException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : IdentityNotMappedException
This seems strange that the local server is unable to translate the SID of a BUILTIN account. I've also tried explicitly putting in the BUILTIN\Users SID in place of the variable in the New-Object line, but that gives me the same error. I've
also tried the solutions given in this thread:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/ad59dc58-1360-4652-ae09-2cd4273cbd4f/remove-acl-issue?forum=winserverpowershell and at this URL:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff730951.aspx but these solutions also failed to have any effect.
My second problem is when I try to apply the newly-created security groups, I also will get the "Some or all identity references could not be translated." I thought I had found a workaround to the problem by adding the -PassThru option to
the New-ADGroup commands, because it would output the SID of the group after creation, however a few lines later, the server is unable to translate the account to apply the security groups to the folder.
My first Powershell script has been working well up to this point and now I seem to have hit a showstopper. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks!

I was hoping to stay with strictly Powershell, but unless I can find a Powershell solution, I may resort to ICACLS.
As for the problems with my groups not being translatable right after creating them, I think I have solved this problem by using the -Server parameter on all my New-ADGroup commands and this example code seems to have gotten around the translation problem,
again utilizing the -Server parameter on the Get-ADGroup command:
get-acl ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName) | fl
$FolderACL = get-acl ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName)
# Add the new normal users group to the folder with Read and Execute permissions
$GroupSID = Get-ADGroup -Identity $GroupName -Server chadc01.jacobsonco.com | Select-Object -ExpandProperty SID
$SIDIdentity = New-Object System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier($GroupSID)
$Ar = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule($SIDIdentity,"ReadAndExecute","ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit", "None", "Allow")
$FolderACL.AddAccessRule($Ar)
# Add the management users group to the folder with Modify permissions
$GroupMGMTSID = Get-ADGroup -Identity $GroupNameMGMT -Server chadc01.jacobsonco.com | Select-Object -ExpandProperty SID
$SIDIdentity = New-Object System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier($GroupMGMTSID)
$Ar = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule($SIDIdentity, "Modify", "ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit", "None", "Allow")
$FolderACL.AddAccessRule($Ar)
Set-ACL ($FSRoot + $FolderPath + $FolderName) $FolderACL
Going this route seems to ensure that the Domain Controller I'm creating my groups on is the same one that I'm querying for the group's SID to use in the FileSystemAccessRule. It's been working fairly consistently.
Still having issues with the translation of the BUILTIN\Users group, though.

Badi created throught Enhancement Spot,but it is not registered in SXS_ATTR

Hi All,
Can anyone please tell me regarding why, When BADI created through Enhancement Spot, it is not registration in the SXS_ATTR table.
During creation of BADI, Through BADI Definition, the interface and Class is generated by the system itself. Where when I create Badi , by Enhancement Spot I need to enter manually both the interface and Class name.
BADI Definition: Z_CUSTOM_BADI
Implementation name : Z_CUSTOM_BADI_1
I hv given a class name as: ZCL_IM_CUSTOM_BADI_1
But during the debugging, it showing the class name as: ZCL_IM_CUSTOM_BADI
Thanks in advance.
Rgds.
Shaik

Hi
I think the request is good for deleting the enhancement, the problem could be if there are other objects there, but if the only object is the enhancement I think It should be ok
@Max, inside the task when i double clicked the enhancement, its throwing an error the cant be read.
That's normal if you have delete it
Max

BADi migrated to enhancement SPOT.

Hi All,
I am working on BADI 'ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST'.When i am implementing this BADI.It is giving the information message like BADI migrated to Enhancement spot.
Is it possiable to implement this BADI.I want to check the condition in the item level.
Can anybody expalin what does it mean.
Thanks,
Swapna.

Hi Swapna,
Check if the BADI is being called by puting a break point in method GET_INSTANCE of class CL_EXITHANDLER.
Put a break point on
CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_class_name_by_interface
    EXPORTING
      instance                      = instance
    IMPORTING
      class_name                    = class_name
    CHANGING
      exit_name                     = exit_name
    EXCEPTIONS
      no_reference                  = 1
      no_interface_reference        = 2
      no_exit_interface             = 3
      data_incons_in_exit_managem   = 4            class_not_implement_interface = 5
      OTHERS                        = 6.
Parameter exit_name will contain the exit names.
and check whether your implemenation is active.

Enhancement object does not exist for enhancement implementation

Hi Experts,
When i tried activating my implementation, i got the sujected error. any kind of inputs will be very helpful. This is an existing implementation and was last changed in October, I just wanted to added few more changes to that.
Here is the long description of the problem.
Diagnosis
An enhancement implementation xxxxxxxxx was delivered to customers, but the enhanced object YYYYYYYYYY does not exist in the system. The corresponding record does not exist in Table .
This can have different reasons:
The enhanced program object YYYYYYYYYY belongs to a different software component than the enhancement and this software component was not relevant for delivery.
An error occurred during system setup so that the enhanced object YYYYYYYYYY was not imported.
The enhancement implementation xxxxxxxxx is obsolete and the enhanced object YYYYYYYYYY has meanwhile been deleted or copied. As a result, there could be enhancement implementations in the system that have not been adjusted or that have incurred an error during deletion or renaming.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator and try to clarify the problem - if necessary, with SAP's help.

Hi Reddy,
1) Please go through the enhance implementation of that. 2) Check whether any thing activation is missing.3) Check the implementation class. It is better to understand if you explain for which badi you are using.
Regards,
Madhu.

Wrong package in enhancement implementation

Hello,
our SAP-Consultants/Developers in the SAP-introduction-project had in the beginning activate the Enhancement Implementation "WF08_START_V2" (transaction SE19) with own coding. Unfortunately there is an error in the coding from this time and we'd like to repair it. But if we want to get into the coding, the following error message appears:
"Message no. TO142
Diagnosis
Object ENHO WF08_START_V2 is in the name range reserved for SAP. The object cannot be assigned to package ZWF, since it belongs to a different name range or namespace.
System Response
Editing is terminated.
Procedure
Assign the object to an SAP package whose name begins with A-S or U-X.
If you want to create the object as a test object, you can also assign it to a local package (1st character = $) or a test package (1st character = T)."
We don't know, how they get the customer package to the SAP standard Enhancement Implementation !?
All our tries to change the coding (or the package) are all failed.
1.     SE19 Button u201CChangeu201D ->Message no. TO142: see above.
2.     SE80: With the Button u201CEnhanceu201D in Include LFMF2F02 (->where the Enhancement Implementation is) -> Message no. TO142: see above.
3.     SE80: Modification in Include LFMF2F02 (->where the Enhancement Implementation is) -> Message no. ED296: Components of enhancements and sections cannot be modified.
4.     SE03: Change the package ZWF in standard->Message no. TO142: see above.
Have anyone a idea ?
Best Regards
Jürgen

If i would have the chance i would have do this.
But I don't know why and how the SAP-Consultant/Developers had made the standard objects assigned to customer name space.
And I had not made the inconsistently situation, but i have now the problem.
The question is how can we bring back the "normal" conditions ?
The situation for me in the moment is this:
Transaction SE19.
Radiobutton "New BadI"
Field "Enhancement Implementation": WF08_START_V2
Button "Change" than comes the message:
"SAP object ENHO WF08_START_V2 cannot be assigned to
package ZWF
Choose 'Display object' or 'Cancel'."
(Message no. TO142)

De-activating UI Enhancement Implementations

Hi,
Can anyone please tell me if its possible to deactivate Enhancement Implementations that are created for ABAP WD components?
I know that Enhancement Implementations that are based out of BADIs have a checkbox "Implementation is Active" by which I can control whether the Enh.Imp is active or not.
Is there something similar even for the Enhancement Implementations that are created for the ABAP WD UIs?
Thanks a lot in advance for your reply.
Best Regards,
Pramod

Hi pramod,
Check this link.
[SDN-Web Dynpro for ABAP|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/63a47dd9-0b01-0010-3d8e-de27242bf011]
Best of luck,
Bhumika

Multiple active implementation

Hi,
For a badi, can be multiple active implementations?
if yes how can I do that?
Thanks.
deniz.

Hi We have a rquirement for doing this
Can you please clarify me
Can I do multiple badi implimentation for std Badi (bbp_WF....)
my requirement this I need to do for   same business object BUs2121
1. For company code   As01 I need to use different logic for Schopping Cart work flow
2. For cmpany code   As 35   I need to use differen logic for Schopping Car Work flow
Can you please provide me the docuemnts if any to do this.
Sekhar

How many implmentation allowed of BAdi with multiple use option???

Dear all ,
                    I have doubt in BAdi implementation -
Case 1 - I have create a z badi with multiple use option enabled . than i create two implementation of that BAdi . when i call it from my z program than it will call only one which was created 1st so what is use of 2nd implementation and when it will call ???
Case 2 - Same case for tcode VD02 their is badi CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA which is also multiple option enable Badi
              for this also i have created 2 implementation but in this case when i create 2nd implementation it asked for migration of implementation why ???
Thanks

Dear deepak ,
                        i have check it both implementation showing yellow color please check my z program and tell me what is wrong in this .
REPORT Y_BADI_EXP1.
CLASS cl_exithandler DEFINITION LOAD.
DATA : l_badi TYPE REF TO ZIF_EX_MYBADI,
       email TYPE AD_SMTPADR,
       email1 TYPE AD_SMTPADR..
PARAMETERS : p_user TYPE sy-uname.
START-OF-SELECTION.
CALL METHOD CL_EXITHANDLER=>GET_INSTANCE
EXPORTING
EXIT_NAME                     = 'ZMYBADI'
NULL_INSTANCE_ACCEPTED        = 'X'
CHANGING
INSTANCE                      = l_badi               " here it will return 2 implementation ZMYBADI_IM1 , ZMYBADI_IM2
EXCEPTIONS
NO_REFERENCE                  = 1
NO_INTERFACE_REFERENCE        = 2
NO_EXIT_INTERFACE             = 3
CLASS_NOT_IMPLEMENT_INTERFACE = 4
SINGLE_EXIT_MULTIPLY_ACTIVE   = 5
CAST_ERROR                    = 6
EXIT_NOT_EXISTING             = 7
DATA_INCONS_IN_EXIT_MANAGEM   = 8
OTHERS                        = 9
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
CALL METHOD l_badi->GET_USER_EMAILID
EXPORTING
uname = p_user
CHANGING
emaill = email.
WRITE : /5 email.       " when o/p comes it shows only 1st implementation .
i placed break point in methods of both implementation but as usual it stop only at first method ???

MM: PO Not Picking up PR Having Multiple Line Items

Hi All,
When Creating PO with Reference to PR Having multiple line items, not picking up the line items and also the vendor and also the where in we have to select input tax code.
CASE1: Created PR 760001340 with single line item and also could able to create PO.
Case2: Created PR 760001341 with multiple line items, When creating PO with reference to PR the line items and Vendor are not picking Up.
Plz. Advise a solution.
Thanks in Advance.....
Regards
Sudheer

HI SHWN,
Thanks for prompt response.
ERROR Message: When referencing a requisition, please also enter a requisition item no.
Regards
Sudheer

Does anyone have experience with having multiple editors work on the same project from different computers?

Does anyone have experience with having multiple editors work on the same project from different computers?

As much as I hate to admit it, YOU ARE RIGHT!
I will tread lightly on this project.
Thanks for the sanity check,
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

BADI having multiple enhancement implementations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for