Bapi_pr_create - External reference error.

I am trying to create pr using bapi_pr_create , im getting following error.
E BAPI 001 No instance of object type PurchaseRequisition has been created. External reference: # 5
I am not passing any value in HEADER-PREQ_NO assuming it should pick up the next PR no in internal no range. However it doesn't.
Looks like some configuration issue.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Tejas.

Hi Sandra,
I was also getting another error message "Enter Material Group".
Now when i am passing a valid material group i get following messages in return table:
I  00                   001 Function 'Create Purchase Requisition' was perform
S 06                   402 Purchase requisition number # 3 created
However my issue is why is it not picking up the PR No from internal no range maintained as from 0010000000 to 0019999999 and the next available no in tht range is 10000109.
Also i dont know how to view PR '#3' if it has been created in the system.
Regards,
Tejas.

Similar Messages

  • BAPI_PR_CREATE giving an error

    Hei Experts!
      'm using BAPI_PR_CREATE  to crate PRs....in the input file, if account assignment caegory is 'K'....'m getting the following error:
    No instance of object type PurchaseRequisition has been created. External reference: # 1
    Requisition date is in the past
    Enter Cost Center
    Enter Cost Center
    ....though I've entered the cost center.
    And... if account assignment caegory is BLANK...PR is being created successfully....
       Please suggest...
    Regards,
    Rudresh
    TCS Mumbai

    Thnx for d reply Pankaj....
        Cost center which I've entered is the valid one and when I'm creating PR manually using ME51N using the same cost center, PR is successfully created....

  • Error when loggong on for external ID "": Error during SAML 2.0 logon

    Hi,
    I'm getting be below error when trying to use SAML SSO for a ABAP Webdynpro page on a NW 7.4 system. When I access the page, it redirects to the identity provider, comes back to the page and it shows the logon page. I'm looking for any ideas of things I could look at.
    N  SAML20 SP (client 400): Incoming Response
    N  SAML20 Binding:          POST
    N  SAML20 IdP Name:         http://xxxxxx/adfs/services/trust
    N  SAML20 Status Code:      urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Responder
    N  SAML20 SP (client 400): Default ACS endpoint: https://xxxxxx/sap/saml2/sp/acs/400 , old default ACS endpoint
    N  SAML-Trace: CALL 'SAML login': SY-SUBRC = 222 , PWDCHG = 0
    N  *** ERROR => SAML-Trace: Path = /sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/oauth2_authority [sign.c       16519]
    N  {root-id=005056AD26DF1ED4B69880FF4BE51F68}_{conn-id=005056AD26DF1ED4B69880FF4BE53F68}_1
    N  *** ERROR => SAML-Trace: Returncode = 222 [sign.c       16519]
    N  *** ERROR => SAML-Trace: Message class = SAML number = 011 [sign.c       16519]
    N  *** ERROR => SAML-Trace: Message = Error when logging on for external ID "": Error during SAML 2.0 logon [sign.c       16519]
    I have updated the service to use alternate logon procedure and added the handler CL_HTTP_EXT_SAML20
    I have added the identity provider through transaction SAML2, but it does not seem to be working.
    Here is a decrypted SAML assertion:
    <samlp:Response ID="_9c844d84-8117-4851-8270-aeb12e935daf"
      Version="2.0"
      IssueInstant="2015-04-02T00:21:06.477Z"
      Destination="https://xxxxxxxxx/sap/saml2/sp/acs/400"
      Consent="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:unspecified"
      InResponseTo="S005056ad-26df-1ed4-b699-c4c630853f68"
      xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
      >
      <Issuer xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion">http://xxxxxxxx.com/adfs/services/trust</Issuer>
      <ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
      <ds:SignedInfo>
      <ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" />
      <ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha256" />
      <ds:Reference URI="#_9c844d84-8117-4851-8270-aeb12e935daf">
      <ds:Transforms>
      <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature" />
      <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" />
      </ds:Transforms>
      <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#sha256" />
      <ds:DigestValue>08HK08VLpJC23JoQs+p+oHbDBvjRF+9NwBeowmlFTrY=</ds:DigestValue>
      </ds:Reference>
      </ds:SignedInfo>
      <ds:SignatureValue>xxxxxxx</ds:SignatureValue>
      <KeyInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
      <ds:X509Data>
      <ds:X509Certificate>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</ds:X509Certificate>
      </ds:X509Data>
      </KeyInfo>
      </ds:Signature>
      <samlp:Status>
      <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Responder">
      <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:NoPassive" />
      </samlp:StatusCode>
      </samlp:Status>
    </samlp:Response>

    Hi Brian,
    I am not sure but you could check below thread and couple of sap note.
    Single Sign On - Sharepoint 2010 to SAP using ADFS
    1799402 - Automatic account creation for SAML 2.0 SP
    1257108 - Collective Note: Analyzing issues with Single Sign On (SSO)
    It may help you to resolve / identify the cause of the issue.
    BR
    AKJ

  • Using an external reference clock for counter measuremen​ts

    Hi all,
    I have several PXI chassis
    configured for testing, each of which uses an NI-DAQ-6221 for
    conducting period and frequency measurements among other things.
    However each of my setups give me a slightly different reading when conducting identical measurements due to
    the tolerance of the DAQ on board reference
    clocks.
    The chassis' have a 10MHz GPS calibrated reference fed into them via the reference input and this is connected to the backplane. I have tried and failed to try to route and use this as my reference
    base for my counter measurements so that each of my cards will give me
    the same reading every time. I have tried the routing method using the
    DAQ connect terminals vi but could not get this to work. I have looked through the labview examples and cant find anything thta shows me what i need to do to take frequency and period measurments using my external reference as my base clock. There are some examples showing the use of the DAQmx timing vi set to sample clock mode which allows a clock source to be selected. However these examples are only for counting digital events and when i apply the same vi to a frequency or period measurement an error is thrown saying 'invalid timing type for this channel', 'you can select: implicit, on demand'.
    I do not
    understand the working of the DAQ hardware very well so was hoping
    someone could help explain to me how to do this if it is even possible
    or give me any guidance as to how else to overcome my problem. Any vis
    showing how to use my external 10MHz reference
    as the base clock for these kind of measurements would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Dan

    Hi Dan,
    Thanks for the reply. When trying to use the connect terminals i just tried connecting the PXI10 to the onboard clock in the hope that this would configure it to use the PXI10 signal to synchronise the onboard clocks via the PLL. Doing this didn't throw any errors as i recall, it just gave me a reading of infinity as it couldn't measure the signal.
    I have actually just managed to successfully do what i wanted thanks to help from Rob at NI tech support UK. There is a DAQmx timing property node which allows you to choose a reference clock source. By using the PXI_Clk10 signal this makes the DAQ synchronise its reference clocks to this signal. I have included an image of the code i used to achieve this to take period measurements.
    Here is a very useful link which Rob sent me which may be of help to anyone else with similar problems
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3615
    Best regards,
    Dan.
    Attachments:
    ExtRef Source Image.jpg ‏105 KB

  • PXI 6733 smallest voltage for external reference?

    Hi, I need to know, what is the smallest voltage possible for external reference?
    I couldnt find this information anywhere, I just found, the internal reference is 20Vpp and the device is 16 bit, so the LSB is 312uV.
    If I connect the EXT_REF with smaller voltage, let say 5V, the reference becomes 10Vpp and the LSB becomes 156uV.
    What is the smallest voltage that I can use, in other words, what is the smallest LSB I can get with this device?
    regards,
    yan.

    In prinziple you can decrease the external reference as you wish. But be aware of the error margin you create.
    You can see in the following graph that the measurement error consists of three parts, which have different reaction to the range:
    It all ends up to the following equation:
    You can see that the gain error (the first part) is only half the equation to finding the actual accuracy of the generation. So, assuming that we have zero temperature drift, if we can greatly reduce our gain error by providing a highly accurate reference signal, then we are still left with the offset error that is independent of the reference signal.
    You will also add additional error margin by using the external source, which ofcause has to be calibrated separetly, and adds an additional voltage drift. I therefor would recommend not to use reference voltages below 0.5V.

  • I get CDD-22400 but there is no external reference.

    Hi,
    This message is related to the one I posted last week "Check constraint or database trigger disappear + Dr Watson".
    I work with Designer 9i (9.0.2.5) under NT4 SP6 and with db 9.2.0.3.
    I have more details and I can reproduce the behaviour.
    Here is the scenario:
    1. I create a view without source tables and columns (I just put a name and click FINISH in the design editor wizard).
    2. I get the error CDD-22400: Attempt to view or modify an object outside of the current workarea.
    3. As suggested by the Action field, I use the External References utility, but it doesn't retrieve anything.
    4. A collateral very annoying effect: the view I just defined is createad but other objects (view, constraint, trigger) that I create after are lost when I leave the Design Editor and I come back.
    Did anyone face this problem?
    Thanks in advance,
    Jean-Jacques Porrovecchio

    Salut Jean-Jacques,
    error CDD-22400 normaly occurs when one of your objects refers to an object outside your workarea.
    This is rather weird in your case as you created a view without specifying any source table/column.
    The only thing I'm thinking of could be that SYSTEM FOLDER is missing from your Workarea.
    Regards,
    Didier.

  • 2012: Execute Package Task (external reference) Very Slow in SSDT

    Hi All,
    I have 4 packages which I've deployed using the package deployment model to the MSDB package store.
    Configuration setup is System Env Var pointing at SSIS Configurations table that populates the connection string of my SSISConfig data source. Source/Dest configurations are in the SSIS Configuration table.
    I have a  'master' package that executes the 4 packages in parallel using the Execute Package control flow task (external reference, SSIS Package Store)
    When I execute this master package in SSDT it takes 1minute 56 seconds to finish. All the execute package tasks seem to hang until the last few sec then finish one after the other. It's the same if execute one of the Execute Package Task items individually.
    It just hangs there for nearly 2 min then rushes through its work (i've verified by looking at the destination tables; nothing happens until the end).
    But the packages executed directly in ssdt take 2-3 sec to execute.
    I've deployed the master package to the server and executed it via SSMS. It takes <3 sec.
    I've RDPed into the ssis box and it's the same. Executing the packages individually or the master package in dtexecui takes less than 3 sec.
    Something's going wrong inside SSDT (some kind of timeout? but there are no error msgs or warning) that's making it take nearly 2 minutes.
    Have others experienced this? Have I misconfigured something? The env var has been working on my local machine since last week and i've restarted many times since then, so I'm positive SSDT is using the 'current' version of the env var.
    Jakub @ Adelaide, Australia

    Very strange. The sysssislogs are the same for any method of execution, but there's a 5 sec delay for each step when executing via SSDT
    endtime,message
    2014-02-06 09:37:15.000,Execute phase is beginning.
    2014-02-06 09:37:20.000,PrimeOutput will be called on a component. : 104 : Merge Join : Merge Join
    2014-02-06 09:37:20.000,PrimeOutput will be called on a component. : 213 : Unchanged : Unchanged
    2014-02-06 09:37:25.000,A component has returned from its PrimeOutput call. : 213 : Unchanged : Unchanged
    2014-02-06 09:37:25.000,A component has returned from its PrimeOutput call. : 104 : Merge Join : Merge Join
    2014-02-06 09:37:30.000,PrimeOutput will be called on a component. : 143 : ODS - Src - State : ODS - Src - State
    2014-02-06 09:37:30.000,PrimeOutput will be called on a component. : 17 : Src - dbo - State : Src - dbo - State
    2014-02-06 09:37:35.000,A component has returned from its PrimeOutput call. : 143 : ODS - Src - State : ODS - Src - State
    2014-02-06 09:37:35.000,A component has returned from its PrimeOutput call. : 17 : Src - dbo - State : Src - dbo - State
    2014-02-06 09:37:35.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 264 : OLE DB Source Output : 182 : Source Checksum : 185 : ChecksumInput : 7 : Source Checksum : Paths[Src - dbo - State.OLE DB Source Output] : Source Checksum.Inputs[ChecksumInput]
    2014-02-06 09:37:35.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 263 : OLE DB Source Output : 53 : Destination Checksum : 56 : ChecksumInput : 7 : Destination Checksum : Paths[ODS - Src - State.OLE DB Source Output] : Destination Checksum.Inputs[ChecksumInput]
    2014-02-06 09:37:40.000,A component will be given the end of rowset signal. : 53 : Destination Checksum : 56 : ChecksumInput : Destination Checksum : Destination Checksum.Inputs[ChecksumInput]
    2014-02-06 09:37:40.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 258 : ChecksumOutput : 104 : Merge Join : 109 : Merge Join Left Input : 7 : Merge Join : Paths[Source Checksum.ChecksumOutput] : Merge Join.Inputs[Merge Join Left Input]
    2014-02-06 09:37:40.000,A component will be given the end of rowset signal. : 182 : Source Checksum : 185 : ChecksumInput : Source Checksum : Source Checksum.Inputs[ChecksumInput]
    2014-02-06 09:37:45.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 259 : ChecksumOutput : 104 : Merge Join : 118 : Merge Join Right Input : 7 : Merge Join : Paths[Destination Checksum.ChecksumOutput] : Merge Join.Inputs[Merge Join Right Input]
    2014-02-06 09:37:45.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 264 : OLE DB Source Output : 182 : Source Checksum : 185 : ChecksumInput : 0 : Source Checksum : Paths[Src - dbo - State.OLE DB Source Output] : Source Checksum.Inputs[ChecksumInput]
    2014-02-06 09:37:45.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 263 : OLE DB Source Output : 53 : Destination Checksum : 56 : ChecksumInput : 0 : Destination Checksum : Paths[ODS - Src - State.OLE DB Source Output] : Destination Checksum.Inputs[ChecksumInput]
    2014-02-06 09:37:50.000,A component has finished processing all of its rows. : 53 : Destination Checksum : 56 : ChecksumInput : Destination Checksum : Destination Checksum.Inputs[ChecksumInput]
    2014-02-06 09:37:50.000,A component has finished processing all of its rows. : 182 : Source Checksum : 185 : ChecksumInput : Source Checksum : Source Checksum.Inputs[ChecksumInput]
    2014-02-06 09:37:55.000,A component will be given the end of rowset signal. : 104 : Merge Join : 118 : Merge Join Right Input : Merge Join : Merge Join.Inputs[Merge Join Right Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:00.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 259 : ChecksumOutput : 104 : Merge Join : 118 : Merge Join Right Input : 0 : Merge Join : Paths[Destination Checksum.ChecksumOutput] : Merge Join.Inputs[Merge Join Right Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:05.000,A component has finished processing all of its rows. : 104 : Merge Join : 118 : Merge Join Right Input : Merge Join : Merge Join.Inputs[Merge Join Right Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:10.000,A component will be given the end of rowset signal. : 104 : Merge Join : 109 : Merge Join Left Input : Merge Join : Merge Join.Inputs[Merge Join Left Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:15.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 258 : ChecksumOutput : 104 : Merge Join : 109 : Merge Join Left Input : 0 : Merge Join : Paths[Source Checksum.ChecksumOutput] : Merge Join.Inputs[Merge Join Left Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:20.000,A component has finished processing all of its rows. : 104 : Merge Join : 109 : Merge Join Left Input : Merge Join : Merge Join.Inputs[Merge Join Left Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:20.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 261 : Merge Join Output : 2 : Add audit columns : 3 : Derived Column Input : 7 : Add audit columns : Paths[Merge Join.Merge Join Output] : Add audit columns.Inputs[Derived Column Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:25.000,A component will be given the end of rowset signal. : 2 : Add audit columns : 3 : Derived Column Input : Add audit columns : Add audit columns.Inputs[Derived Column Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:25.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 260 : Derived Column Output : 195 : Type 1 SCD : 196 : Conditional Split Input : 7 : Type 1 SCD : Paths[Add audit columns.Derived Column Output] : Type 1 SCD.Inputs[Conditional Split Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:30.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 265 : Unchanged : 213 : Unchanged : 214 : Union All Input 1 : 7 : Unchanged : Paths[Type 1 SCD.Unchanged] : Unchanged.Inputs[Union All Input 1]
    2014-02-06 09:38:30.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 261 : Merge Join Output : 2 : Add audit columns : 3 : Derived Column Input : 0 : Add audit columns : Paths[Merge Join.Merge Join Output] : Add audit columns.Inputs[Derived Column Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:35.000,A component has finished processing all of its rows. : 2 : Add audit columns : 3 : Derived Column Input : Add audit columns : Add audit columns.Inputs[Derived Column Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:40.000,A component will be given the end of rowset signal. : 195 : Type 1 SCD : 196 : Conditional Split Input : Type 1 SCD : Type 1 SCD.Inputs[Conditional Split Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:45.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 260 : Derived Column Output : 195 : Type 1 SCD : 196 : Conditional Split Input : 0 : Type 1 SCD : Paths[Add audit columns.Derived Column Output] : Type 1 SCD.Inputs[Conditional Split Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:50.000,A component has finished processing all of its rows. : 195 : Type 1 SCD : 196 : Conditional Split Input : Type 1 SCD : Type 1 SCD.Inputs[Conditional Split Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:55.000,A component will be given the end of rowset signal. : 66 : Insert ODS - Src - State : 79 : OLE DB Destination Input : Insert ODS - Src - State : Insert ODS - Src - State.Inputs[OLE DB Destination Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:55.000,A component will be given the end of rowset signal. : 220 : Update ODS - Src - State : 225 : OLE DB Command Input : Update ODS - Src - State : Update ODS - Src - State.Inputs[OLE DB Command Input]
    2014-02-06 09:38:55.000,A component will be given the end of rowset signal. : 213 : Unchanged : 214 : Union All Input 1 : Unchanged : Unchanged.Inputs[Union All Input 1]
    2014-02-06 09:39:00.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 262 : New : 66 : Insert ODS - Src - State : 79 : OLE DB Destination Input : 0 : Insert ODS - Src - State : Paths[Type 1 SCD.New] : Insert ODS - Src - State.Inputs[OLE DB Destination Input]
    2014-02-06 09:39:00.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 257 : Changed : 220 : Update ODS - Src - State : 225 : OLE DB Command Input : 0 : Update ODS - Src - State : Paths[Type 1 SCD.Changed] : Update ODS - Src - State.Inputs[OLE DB Command Input]
    2014-02-06 09:39:00.000,"The final commit for the data insertion in ""Insert ODS - Src - State"" has started."
    2014-02-06 09:39:00.000,Rows were provided to a data flow component as input. : : 265 : Unchanged : 213 : Unchanged : 214 : Union All Input 1 : 0 : Unchanged : Paths[Type 1 SCD.Unchanged] : Unchanged.Inputs[Union All Input 1]
    2014-02-06 09:39:00.000,"The final commit for the data insertion in ""Insert ODS - Src - State"" has ended."
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,A component has finished processing all of its rows. : 213 : Unchanged : 214 : Union All Input 1 : Unchanged : Unchanged.Inputs[Union All Input 1]
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,A component has finished processing all of its rows. : 220 : Update ODS - Src - State : 225 : OLE DB Command Input : Update ODS - Src - State : Update ODS - Src - State.Inputs[OLE DB Command Input]
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,A component has finished processing all of its rows. : 66 : Insert ODS - Src - State : 79 : OLE DB Destination Input : Insert ODS - Src - State : Insert ODS - Src - State.Inputs[OLE DB Destination Input]
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,Post Execute phase is beginning.
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,Insert ODS - Src - State wrote 0 rows.
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,Cleanup phase is beginning.
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,End of package execution.
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,"<?xml version=""1.0""?><DTS:ProcessMemoryUsage xmlns:DTS=""www.microsoft.com/SqlServer/Dts""><DTS:PeakWorkingSetSize>66457600</DTS:PeakWorkingSetSize></DTS:ProcessMemoryUsage>"
    2014-02-06 09:39:05.000,End of package execution.
    Look at the times. It's going up in exact 5sec increments! The package takes about 3 sec to run when the master package is executed via dtexecUI outside SSDT. The log looks "normal" in those instances as well; the end times are more randomised
    This is with SP1 CU8 installed.
    Jakub @ Adelaide, Australia

  • Agilent 34970A External Reference Configuration via Labview 8.2

    Hello
    I am trying to scan up to 12 channels with the Agilent 34970A. My goal is to measure the temperature using channel 101 as the external reference using 4-wire RTD whereas all the other channels are supposed to use Thermocouple (k-Type). I know that the Agilent is able to do so, because you can configure it on the manual display. My problem is that every time I have configured Channel 101 ( CONF: TEMP FRTD,85, (@101)) and then the other Channels 102:1XX ( CONF: TEMP TC,K, (@102:1XX)) it seems that the configurations for Channel 101 are lost. I tried everything I could come up with to seperate the inputs, but nothing usable comes up. Any Advice?
    Thanks Neja

    There are two different drivers sets for the 34970, but they're not from Agilent. They're available from the NI Instrument Driver Network. Since you said you had it working under 7.1 you're probably using the older "hp34970" drivers. The error codes you indicated are -138, which is "Suffix not allowed", and -113, which is "Undefined header". Both of these basically mean a syntax error, which is likely incorrect code with the drivers. There are numerous configuration VIs. Which one are you using, and how are you calling it? Can you use the updated project-style drivers available from the link I posted?
    I'm not quite sure I understand what you're saying with the COM ports. You said you get nothing when using COM1 or COM2. How many devices do you have connected to your COM ports? What communication parameters (baud rate) are you setting?
    It would probably be worthwhile to see what happens if you try to talk to instrument via MAX to see if this is a communication problem or a LabVIEW problem. With the LabVIEW drivers you can see what command is being sent out to the instrument by simply putting a probe on the string that's being fed to the VISA Write. Then, you can enter the same command in MAX (as well as confirming the command from the user manual) to see what happens.

  • Lync 2013 federation with Skype error: 'Reference error id 504 (Source ID 239)

    I have setup lync 2013, configured skype federation (http://www.techtroubleshoot.com/federate-lync-server-with-skype/) and also done Lync provisioning. Skype federation worked for a few days (2weeks) and then stopped. Currently I am getting the following
    error 'Reference error id 504 (Source ID 239)'.
    Ports are open on the firewall. I however still get the error.
    KimaniBob

    Verify from following:
    you can telnet to your sip domain on port 5061 and 443 from external and resolve of nslookup to srv record of sipfederation is correct.
    Certificate on Edge Server not expire or damaged.
    This link had similar issue, you can check it.
    http://terenceluk.blogspot.com/2013/04/unable-to-send-instant-messages-or-view.html
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"

  • When contacting your support team, reference error ID 504 (ssource ID 239)

    Hi,
    The certificate and the CA server was changed
    Got some issues:
    External Lync user cannot change lync status from offline to online
    Even if the external Lync user status is offline, the user can still see the status of his contacts
    External Lync user can IM the internal Lync user but the internal Lync usercannot reply to IM with error message
    when contacting your support team, reference error ID 504 (ssource ID 239)    
    Any known issues and fix?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Please make sure that Edge can resolve the user's front end.
    Please check the old posts similar issue that has been resolved.
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/071b373b-6851-45fc-96c2-6f8f60eb32de/internal-user-got-error-id-504-source-id-239-when-reply-the-message-to-external-user?forum=lyncprofile
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/eff520ae-826e-441e-98aa-9bc6b47aed6b/unable-to-message-external-user?forum=ocsedge
    check this
    https://greiginsydney.com/decoding-lyncs-client-side-error-messages/
    Whenever you see a helpful reply, click on Vote As Helpful & click on Mark As Answer if a post answers your question.

  • I get a "JavaScript Application - Reference Error: XPCSafeJSObjectWrapper is not defined" error every time I try to open a new tab.

    <blockquote>Locking duplicate thread.<br>
    Please continue here: [/questions/777191]</blockquote><br>
    Just like the title says, starting with Firefox 4 Beta 6 or 7, I forgot. Any time I try to open a new blank tab (sometimes even when I start up Firefox and the app tabs load) I get an error that says "JavaScript Application - Reference Error: XPCSafeJSObjectWrapper is not defined" If I close it everything works as normal again (until I open a new tab) but it is very annoying to have to do this. Is there any fix for this or is the bug just still there?

    Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of the add-ons is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes).
    * Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
    See:
    * [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]]
    * [[Troubleshooting plugins]]

  • External Reference number not copied in Service Confirmation

    Hi,
    We are on CRM 5.0 SP11. We have Mobile Service 5.0 SP11.
    In Mobile Service in the Service Order creation screen we have a window to input External reference number. When we create a Service Confirmation as a followup document of Service Order, SAP by default only allows to copy Reference Object,Subject and notes (both header and item level) to the Confirmation.
    Does anyone have idea how we can copy the External Reference number to Confirmation when we do followup to Service Orders on mobile.
    This functionality works fine on Enterprise.
    Thanks,
    Yatin

    Hello,
                 The external number won't be copied by standard as Wolhfard said they are different documents.
    You need to code this to make this copy from service order to Service confirmation.
    Open your Mobile Application Studio and make following changes.
    Open the BusinessObject "BOMSVHelper"  and view the code. Go to the Method "CopySrvTransHeader"  write the following code in it.
    Find the code
    UserName = _unwind(BusinessRootObject.UserDataDictionary.GetData("USERNAME"))
    and paste the following code below it.
            Dim servconfobj As BusinessObject = bocopysrvtrans.SalesInfo
            Dim servtransobj As BusinessObject = orderheaderobj.SalesInfo
            servconfobj.SetAttribute("PoNumberSold", servtransobj.GetAttribute("PoNumberSold"))
            servconfobj.SetAttribute("PoDateSold", servtransobj.GetAttribute("PoDateSold"))

  • IMac G5 won't boot, external interrupt error

    I started my iMac G5 and did get the chime but it automatically goes into OF mode. The fans run loudly and it continously scrolls an "external interrupt" error with a bunch of jargon that goes by so fast I can't read it.
    I tried resetting SMU, none of the bootup key sequences work, I can't boot from disk and it won't go into target disk mode. I've searched online "external interrupt" which has been an issue for others, but haven't found an answer to the problem yet.
    I just tried resetting SMU again. This time I got the chime again, but now have a black screen. After about 30 seconds of nothing the fans start running and the screen remains black. Help please!

    Worth trying a few more times:
    Resetting the SMU on a G5 iMac:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1767
    and on resetting the PMU on a Power Mac G5, G4 and G3 :
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1939?viewlocale=en_US
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1436

  • Using excel sheets with externa references

    I was hopping someone could point me somewhere to begin here.
    What if I am implementing CM solution in a financial department, which strongly uses excel spreadsheets, which means they're going to need external references from a file, to another .xls for example. Is there any thing about that matter in UCM?
    ty

    Post what you would like to do in Excel here
    http://www.microsoft.com/mac/support

  • Resolving External References ....in a package

    hi all..
    Resolving External References in IR Subprogram
    CREATE PROCEDURE above_salary
    (emp_id IN NUMBER)
    AUTHID CURRENT_USER
    AS
    emps NUMBER;
    BEGIN
    -- External reference is resolved in schema of current user:
    SELECT * FROM employees
    WHERE employee_id = emp_actions.num_above_salary(emp_id);
    -- External reference is resolved in schema of owner of above_salary:
    emps := emp_actions.num_above_salary(emp_id);
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE
    ('Number of employees with higher salary: ' || TO_CHAR(emps));
    END;
    CALL above_salary(120);
    what are the security reasons for which the references is behaving as above..
    thanks in advance
    gud day

    SELECT * FROM employees
    WHERE employee_id = emp_actions.num_above_salary(emp_id);
    in the above statement package emp_actiosns called indirectly from a select statement ....and while executing the package above_salary which is calling emp_actions..
    the resolution of the name is by currentuser.emp_actions....(INVOKER RIGHTS)
    BUT..
    emps := emp_actions.num_above_salary(emp_id);
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE
    ('Number of employees with higher salary: ' || TO_CHAR(emps));
    in this statement while executing the above salary package .....the package empaction is resolved as owner.emp_action(DEFINER RIGHTS)
    WHY IS THIS DIFFERENCE IMPORTANT..WHAT ARE THE SECURITY REASONS BEHIND IT

Maybe you are looking for