BC4J - Multi-User Environment

Can someone explain, how to setup a BC4J project in a multi-user environment. In my case I want to create 50-100 Users in the database (I don't prefer creating a table and storing usernames and passwords in that table as in Auctions example). Do I need to create a connection.properties with 50-100 user connections? How does the connection pooling work in such a case. I am sure that someone might have went through this process. I need some input.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Virinchi

http://technet.oracle.com:89/ubb/Forum2/HTML/006025.html

Similar Messages

How to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1 and 6.1 server..(Urgently)

Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

Hi. A JDBC connection pool is a set of identical, interchangeable, pre-made
connections, and the controls to make sure only one user uses a particular
connection at any one time. If you want to have different DBMS users, you can
have a separate pool for each DBMS user, which may contain as many or few
connections as you want. Some applications has a pool for the accounting
applications, and another for the sales applications etc. Some do have a
separate pool for john, jane, joe etc, each with one connection. Pools
can be created and destroyed dynamically using the dynamic pool API.
Joe
softstar wrote:
>
Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

Firefox 4 multi user environment in linux: How to set global settings?

<blockquote>Locking duplicate thread.<br>
Please continue here: [/questions/826921]</blockquote><br>
Hi,
We used to be able to change settings in all.js file in FF 3.x.x platform, for changing settings like, proxy, authentication, etc. We installed FF 4.0.1 in linux, but, I can't find the all.js file to change any of the global settings in FF 4.0.1.
Could you please point me how to changeglobal settings in FF 4.x version?
thanks in advance.

Hi. A JDBC connection pool is a set of identical, interchangeable, pre-made
connections, and the controls to make sure only one user uses a particular
connection at any one time. If you want to have different DBMS users, you can
have a separate pool for each DBMS user, which may contain as many or few
connections as you want. Some applications has a pool for the accounting
applications, and another for the sales applications etc. Some do have a
separate pool for john, jane, joe etc, each with one connection. Pools
can be created and destroyed dynamically using the dynamic pool API.
Joe
softstar wrote:
>
Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

UPK11 - multi-user environment - manage author permissions - help

We are configuring our UPK 11 multi-user environment.
As we have it set, the "everyone" group has modify access to all folders.
I would like to have a few admins have modify access to the system folder and everyone else be read only.
Here's my dilemma -
My admin profile is also a part of the everyone group - so if I set the permissions on the everyone group to read only, that effects the admin login as well.
The documentation says that if I set up an author with explicit folder permissions, that they are not included in the everyone group, but everytime I try, they are added (irrevocably) to the everyone group before I can even assign an explicit permission.
I tried to set the everyone group to read only and nearly hobbled my admin account.
Can someone who has managed authors in a UPK 11 multii-user environment send out some tips?
I'm not understanding the documentation well enough to make headway.
[email protected]

Hi Paul,
I recently performed an implementation of UPK 11 at a client and had to show one of their employees how to administer the security surrounding profiles and authors.
The group "Everyone" is default, and each person will belong to that group. It seems that when a person is assigned to another group/with author-specific permissions, it will override that which is set to the "Everyone" group.
What I normally suggest (and implement) is that you modularise your security (separate the authors into their respective departments), and then create those departments as groups, and then assign permissions as required. Lets use an example - it assumes you are logged in as an admin user:
I create 3 folders (where 4 and 5 are defaults):
1. HR
2. FIN
3. CS
4. Administrators
5. Everyone
Each author is defaulted to number 5, and all administrators should be included in group 4.
Now the goal is to prevent HR and FIN from modifying CS, and vice-versa for the other two groups.
You will see in your library that the root is defined as "/". Firstly, ensure that the Administrators group has Modify access to this folder (Administration --> Manage Groups --> Permissions). I think you need to click on edit, then click on the "Add" button (under permissions), and choose the root folder "/" - ensure it has modify - by default this value should already exist. This now ensures that the security is filtered down to all sub-ordinate folders that exist under the root folder - you do not need to manually assign "modify" permissions to each folder for the Administrator group, as you have already done so at root level.
You will also notice that there is a "Members/Users" tab (can't remember off the top of my head which), and this allows you to select the profiles/authors that have Administrator group priviledges - ensure the correct users are selected.
I normally leave the "Everyone" group as it is - do this for now, ensure everyone is included in it, and only modify after you have implemented and tested your security structure if needs be - normally the other group permissions override the "Everyone" group permissions.
Next step is to assign department specific permissions to the 3 folders we created. Navigate to Administration --> Manage Groups, and ensure that you begin by editing the first department group (HR) - create the group if not already done, then edit (little pencil logo). You would like all HR users to have full modify access to their folder only, but they must not be able to mess around with the other two departments or the "System", "Getting started with UPK" and "/" folders. Under permissions, click on the Add button, and ensure that the folder "HR" has modify priviledge. Add the remaining 4 folders (CS, FIN, System, Getting started with UPK), and assign either Read or Read/View permission - this will ensure all other folders cannot be modified by HR users. Add the relevant HR users to the group under the "Members/Users" tab.
Apply the same for FIN and CS respectively.
Now you could get to a point where you may need cross-departmental access for a few users (FIN may need to access some HR content). I recommed that you do this on the user level, and not the group level, as you will limit who can access other departments. Navigate to Administration --> Manage Authors. Click on the specific user that will require access to another department. Edit his profile and under the permissions tab, ensure that he has required access to the other department folder (or sub-folders only) by adding and assigning the priveledge. This should ovveride the group security set for that specific department - but only for this user!
Test by attempting to create content in an un-authorised folder (when logged in as a normal user). Test admin account by creating content in each folder. If it works - you will no longer need to modify "Everyone", as your permissions are defined under the other groups. I hope this all makes sense?
Thats it in a nutshell really.
I hope that this helps, and feel free to get back to me if you are still unsure?
Regards,
Greig

How to make extension available for all users in a multi user environment

Hi,
In a multi-user environment, a user install a dreamweaver extension,but just the user who install the extension can use it.
Is there a way that administrator install the extension and make this extension available for other users in multi-user environment(e.g. the Windows 7)
Thanks

In a multi-user environment, a user install a dreamweaver extension,but just the user who install the extension can use it.
Is there a way that administrator install the extension and make this extension available for other users in multi-user environment(e.g. the Windows 7)
Dreamweaver had this capability many releases ago, but it has been dropped, so it's no longer available.
Regards,
Randy Edmunds
Dreamweaver Development
Adobe Systems, Inc.

Problem with mode switching/Volume Panel in multi-user environment?

As above - using Windows 7 64-bit with an X-Fi Titanium Fatalty card.
All works well as long as I'm the only person logged in, but if my wife logs into the computer (using Windows 7's built-in multi-user mode...'fast user switching', which is enabled by default), and then I log back in...well, the volume panel app doesn't seem to work. In fact, even using the control panel app, I can't regain control of the soundcard enough to switch modes.
Logging her off doesn't resolve the issue, so it seems like something about her logging on (another user logging in, two volpanlu.exe running, something) is causing my instance to go haywire. [FWIW, I'm a 'standard' user on the PC, and her login is a 'limited' user]
Note that 'killing' the task volpanlu.exe in task managed, then going to the Windows services control panel and stopping and re-starting the 'Windows Audio' service, and finally re-launching volpanlu.exe from the start menu DOES always work to resolve the problem (regardless of if she's logged in or not...this always fixes it).
Still, that's a kinda annoyingly large set of steps to always have to go through whenever I want to change audio mode after she's logged in.
Is there any way to fix this? Any setting I could be missing to optimize the X-Fi control panel for multi-user environments? Any of the X-Fi mod dri've packs handle fast user switching better? Any other ideas?

GA little bit more tinkering around this, and I have some more information:
- Once I "seize control" (the kill of volpanlu, restart 'Windows Audio' service, re-launch volpanlu), if my wife logs back in, now *she* can't change the audio mode

Web Agent and Clip Board set up for multi user environment

Hi
Our environment is
Database: 0racle8.1.5 on Sun Solaris
Currently we are not using OAS but a portal server and Apache
Intermedia Web Agent and Clip Board are working fine.
The questions are
1. if there are multiple users (content managers) who would be adding /modifying content in the database, the how can I go about with Clip board.
2.The requirement is these people should be able to search documents on the basis of keywords. So how do we integrate Intermedia query capabilities on this clip board interface.
3. For production level how do we go about implementing.
Should we continue to have the ctxsys user and use that itself.
Thank you for any solutions

I have NO idea if these "exact problems" pertain to Macs, since I think most of these discussions are about Windows... but, some reading (not all PPro, but I put all the links I have saved, just for general information)
-see #3 http://forums.adobe.com/thread/771151
-you may NOT "map" your My Documents folder to a network drive
-you MUST give all users administrator accounts to use Premiere
-and especially Encore dual layer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/969395
-#5 Server 2008 is UNsupported http://forums.adobe.com/thread/851602
-a work around, of sorts http://forums.adobe.com/thread/957523
-and not on a "domain" http://forums.adobe.com/thread/858977
-also PreEl see #5 http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1017199
-more PreEl problem http://forums.adobe.com/thread/975117
The solution... some day... may be at this link
Adobe Anywhere http://www.adobe.com/products/adobeanywhere.html

How to Handle Connection Informatin in a Multi-User Environment

Hello,
I am trying to setup SQL Developer on a Terminal Services box where multiple users will have access to use this tool. However, I have noticed that conenction details are shown globally on a Terminal Services box to anyone who has access to use SQL Developer.
Is there a way to force these connection details to be stored in a user's Documents and Settings directory?
Thanks in advance...
Tom

After digging through the forum a bit, I have found that I can use the following switch in my shortcut to SQLDeveloper to achive this.
C:\oracle\sqldeveloper\sqldeveloper.exe -J-Dide.user.dir="%USERPROFILE%\.SQLdeveloper"
I tried to modify the SQLDeveloper.boot but that did not seem to work correctly. The above mentioned switch updates the "c:\documents and settings\%username%\.sqrdeveloper" with all password related information and SQL history that was important to meet our security requirements. We updated the shortcut in the AllUsers profile and this seems to work globally.
The only bad thing about this approach is that anyone can go into %AppData%\sqldeveloper.exe and run it without using the shortcuts. This would bypass the security precaution.
Is there a better way to approach this?
Regards,
Tom

Refreshing af:selectOneChoice values in multi-user environment

Imagine the following scenario:
a) User 1 is looking at a af:selectOneChoice on a web (ADF Faces) page showing some data
b) User 2 inserts a new row in the table (from different jsf page) whose data is shown on that af:selectOneChoice, and commits that new row
I need I way for the User 1 to see newly inserted row as a choice in the af:selectOneChoice.
So, here is relevant part of code:
                            <af:selectOneChoice value="#{bindings.LokacijaId.inputValue}"
                                                label="#{bindings.LokacijaId.label}"
                                                binding="#{tradingTicketBacking.selectOneChoice15}"
                                                id="selectOneChoice15"
                                                showRequired="true">
                              <f:selectItems value="#{bindings.LokacijaId.items}"
                                             binding="#{tradingTicketBacking.selectItems16}"
                                             id="selectItems16"/>
                            </af:selectOneChoice>- and here is relevant part of pageDef :
    <list IterBinding="TeeTradingTicketVOIterator" Uses="LOV_LokacijaId"
          id="LokacijaId">
      <AttrNames>
        <Item Value="LokacijaId"/>
      </AttrNames>
    </list>So, how to refresh values in the af:selectOneChoice, in order to see changes made by another user ?
I have the same question for data displayed in a af:table - how to make changes made by another user to be automatically visible for the first user ? What is the best way to achieve this ?
I am using ADF BC, and when I say "automatically", I mean "after User 1 made form submit in any way (partial or not)"
Message was edited by:
Cwele
Message was edited by:
Cwele

After user 1 submits the page, it might not even be committed, so there is no way to have the pending data from user1 seen by user2.
However, we do have a new feature in ADF 11g TP4 that I plan to blog more about called Auto-Refresh view objects. This feature allows a view object instance in a shared application module to refresh its data when it receives the Oracle 11g database change notification that a row that would affect the results of the query has been changed.
The minimum requirements in 11g TP4 to experiment with this feature which I just tested are the following:
1. Must use Database 11g
2. Database must have its COMPATIBLE parameter set to '11.0.0.0.0' at least
3. Set the "AutoRefresh" property of the VO to true (on the Tuning panel)
4. Add an instance of that VO to an application module (e.g. LOVModule)
5. Configure that LOVModule as an application-level shared AM in the project properties
6. Define an LOV based on a view accessor that references the shared AM's VO instance
7. DBA must have performed a 'GRANT CHANGE NOTIFICATION TO YOURUSER'
8. Build an ADF Form for the VO that defined the LOV above and run the web page
9. In SQLPlus, go modify a row of the table on which the shared AM VO is based and commit
When the Database delivers the change notification, the shared AM VO instance will requery itself.
However that notification does not arrive all the way out to the web page, so you won't see the change until the next time you repaint the list.
Perhaps there is some way to take it even farther with the active data feature PaKo mentions, but I'm not familiar enough with that myself to say whether it would work for you hear.

Cisco TSP in a Citrix/WTS Multi user environment ?

Does someone know if it works with any version of the Call Manager.
I just read something about the Cisco TSP- driver that can use any application that supports TAPI like Outlook and Navision do.
But I didn?t find anything about the compatibility with citrix or wts...
But when I think about I can imagine that it does not work because it's just one Outlook per server in multiple instances...hm.
Maybe you know an alternative way to initiate calls from the desktop.
thanks in advance
EDIT: SORRY- saw there are already some posts relating this issue.

I had tried this exact thing on a Citrix server. Problem was, there is only one logon instance for the TSP and it pulled up the same extension for all Citrix user on that server. After this, I did try it further. Hopefully you will have better luck than I.

Application contexts in multi-user environments

[Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.3.0]
Hi,
I'm experimenting with application contexts as a means of utilizing bind variables in variable WHERE clauses.
In a multi-user environment where the database is accessed from an application using a single user id, are there any conflicts involved when the same procedure is accessed multiple times and the same context variable is set to different values by each call? In other words, can I assume that between the time the user_id of my_context is set and the query is executed in procedure call 1 that those values will be used and not be affected by other procedure calls also setting the user_id of my_context?
Thanks,
Ed Holloman
================================================
create or replace context my_context using my_proc;
================================================
In procedure call 1 to my_proc:
================================================
my_query := 'SELECT * FROM my_table ' ||
'WHERE user_id = sys_context(''my_context'',''user_id'')';
dbms_session.set_context('my_context', 'user_id', '12345');
OPEN my_refcursor FOR
my_query;
================================================
In procedure call 2 to my_proc:
================================================
my_query := 'SELECT * FROM my_table ' ||
'WHERE buyer_id = sys_context(''my_context'',''user_id'')';
dbms_session.set_context('my_context', 'user_id', '45678');
OPEN my_refcursor FOR
my_query;
================================================
etc.

A quick little test shows John's statement in action:
sql>create or replace procedure test_procedure
2    (p_value in pls_integer,
3     p_rc    out sys_refcursor)
4 is
5 begin
6    dbms_session.set_context('TEST_CONTEXT', 'VALUE', to_char(p_value));
7    open p_rc for select sys_context('TEST_CONTEXT', 'VALUE') from dual;
8 end;
9 /
Procedure created.
sql>var rc1 refcursor
sql>var rc2 refcursor
sql>exec test_procedure(1, :rc1)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
sql>exec test_procedure(2, :rc2)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
sql>print rc2
SYS_CONTEXT('TEST_CONTEXT','VALUE')
2
1 row selected.
sql>print rc1
SYS_CONTEXT('TEST_CONTEXT','VALUE')
1
1 row selected.Note the original value (1) has not been stomped on by the second execution even though we fetched this after that second execution and fetch sequence.

Aperture as a Multi-User Digital Asset Management Tool

Does anyone have any experience using Aperture in a multi-user environment? I'm trying to compare it to Cumulus by Canto which is designed as a multi-user tool.
I realize that each user would have a copy of Aperture on their Mac, but are there other issues that are not such as multi-variable searching capabilities of one versus the other. My gut tells me that Cumulus is more robust and can handle much larger libraries as well as all types of digital data and can search within document such as InDesign for a particular image.
Thanks
--Mitch

There is no possible way you can use Cumulus and
actually save money.
I don’t expect to save money. I expect to save time finding info, and avoiding duplication of almost everything we have
Stepping into digital asset management is a far bigger
issue than your boss can imagine. Try not to take this
personally, but your initial question about using
Aperture as an enterprise or workgroup DAM suggests you
have no idea what you're suggesting or possibly getting
into. Canto is all smoke and mirrors unless you can
afford the training and have dedicated, competent and
engaged support personnel.
Nothing taken personally. The question was asked because management is promoting Aperture as the end-all and be-all of imagement, whereas I’m looking for a tool to manage all our documents
Before you go much further, you need to understand
databases and you need to understand that DAM's return
on investment is not about saving money, it's about
preventing the spending of money; a huge difference and
there are few mgrs who can parse that difference from
the sales hype. Buy a copy of "The DAM Book" and try to
get someone to explain databases, cataloging
applications and server-based storage to you.
I understand databases quite well, but I will get a copy of the book you mentioned. I am running an Xserve in my environment, so I do understand servers and OS X Server.
I wish you tremendous luck and hope your experiences
are better than most of the Canto customers I have ever
met, including me. You just have no idea how expensively
wrong your decision to employ Cumulus could turn out to
be. Not that it's a bad product (although we thoroughly
despise it); it's sold as a miracle. Cumulus is a
supremely complex (not necessarily complicated),
over-designed and totally un-Macintosh application.
What version of Cumulus are you using, and why are you so unhappy with it? May I contact you off line to discuss this?
Thanks for the reply
—Mitch

LOV restriction prob. in multi-user evnironment

hi to all,
I am in a prob. for 3 days. i want to restrict the LOV that once the user selects a value from LOV it must not be shown in LOV again. I have used
declare
b boolean;
begin
post;
b := show_lov('ord_lov');
end;
in when-button-pressed. It works but in multiuser environment , when the same form is opened at more than one client's end , the form helds for 2nd user until 1st user closes the same form. Is there any way to handle this LOV restriction in multi-user environment. Help me plz

How do you maintain the information about who has seen what rows?

Convert module sigle user environment to multiuser

Hello
Currently module supports single user. Now, we have to make it to support multiple users.
There are certain problems with current form module if it is used as multi user environment.
For example, multiple users are running this module at a time and retrieving same value simultaneously in ITEM# field by pressing the ACQUIRENEW# button these items are already exist 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039......eg. if one user run this module and get item# 1036, second user also run this form and get the same item# 1036, third user also run this form and get the same item# 1036 but second should get 1037 and third user should get 1038 at the same time.
Second user cannot get item# 1037 until first user commit the value the item# 1036 but our client working in multiuser environment where at the same time so many user run this form and first user got 1036 second got 1037 third got 1038 an so on...
You have to make sure that duplicate product# should not be entered.
any one can give a sample code please help me this is urgent.
thanks in advance.
regards,
deemy

If you are putting this into a multiuser environment then:
"Second user cannot get item# 1037 until first user commit the value the item# 1036 "
Means you must introduce serialisation so that effectively only a single user can access the process to a acquirenew#
If this is what you want to achieve then you may have to go back to the old table method of generating sequence values.
If you have a table solely to manage the new value then when the user asks for a new value you can select from the table for update with nowait this will stop any other user getting a value until your user commits or rolls back their transaction.
At that point there is a free for all when a new/or the same user can lock the table again.
This will meet your requirement, but I think you should look at your design, perhaps use a sequence and consider how essential it is to maintain an unbroken sequence of item# (I think there are numerous threads on this site which have talked about maintaining this type of sequence) as this will STOP everyone except one person working with a new value and is not often the intention of a multiuser environment.

File Discrepancies for Multi Users

Hi ...
We are running RH7 and RSC3.1 with 3 users - We identified
(only yesterday) that after User 1 had deleted one topic file from
Project Manager and added several others ... User 2 and 3 had
broken links for these topics.
We are able to update existing topics by one user, who check
in, then user 2 and 3 can get the latest version and instantly view
the changes - lovely!! Exactly what we would expect ...
But the same is not occurring when we remove or add entire
topics to both the Project Manager and the TOC ...
User 2 and 3 see the topics in the TOC with the dreaded red
cross through them ... and have to try and locate the file or
restore broken links etc ... to get their view of the project in
sync with User 1. This seems to defeat the whole purpose of being
able to have a multi user authoring environment????
A major concern of this problem appears to be the risk of
undoing each others work by potentially restoring files that
another user intended to remove ...
Is anyone else experiencing similar issues ... we are in a
big organisation and are very restricted in terms of our ability to
access the servers etc ... but I want to know if there is something
we should be checking or doing differently from an application
perspective? Any advice or ideas are greatly appreciated...
Many thanks ...
Frustrated!

Hi Fi@qldpol, and welcome to the board. With your situation,
there are two likely possibilities:
1. Was your project added to source control via RoboHelp, or
was it initially added using RoboSource Control? If it was added
from RoboSource Control, then that is the problem.
2. If #1 is not the problem, then you might be having
problems with some of the users' CPD files. First, have everyone
make backups of the local version of their project (the files
actually residing on their PCs). Then have User 2 and User 3 delete
their copy of the project, and replace it with a copy of User 1's
local files. Before they open the project, they should delete the
cpd and pss files. After they delete those files, they can open the
project as usual and let the cpd file rebuild. We have to do this
every so often with some of our projects to get everyone
synchronized.
Hope that helps.
G

BC4J - Multi-User Environment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for