BEGDA LOGIC IN MASTER DATA?

We are going live by 14th Aug 2007. My Payroll control record is from 01042007. 1)What should be the BEGDA of Work Schedule Rule in master data for IT0007(Planned working time).
2)Similarly in IT2006 (Absence Quota),Leave Quota Balance for some plant happening on 1st Jan and some other plant by 1st of July. So shall they take Absence quota as per their credit Jan1st 2007 and July1st 2007?
3In IT 2001 (Absence), we are having four fields:
PERNR BEGDA ENDDA AWART
N N N C
8 8 8 4
PersNo: Beg Date End Date Abs.Type
000001 01012007 02012007 1020-Casual Leave.
My doubt here is say they have to maintain Casual leave for an employee 000001 for 2 days from 01012007 to 02012007 they ll be maintaining in above fashion.
OR
Can we skip this Infotype 2001 as we are maintaining the absence quota available with employees till July 1st.
Thanks$Regards,
Kaushal Rana

better to make your control record begdate as go live date work schedule rule date may be any date less than or equl to go live date
2.u can group those two plants differently and use different dates accordingly
Reward Points if useful

Similar Messages

Function Module Call Via CMOD Logic for Master Data Enhancement

Hi Friends Please help me to resolve this, would really be very kind of all of you.
Requirement. I want to Enhance the field ZFACTREG from VIBDBE table in my datasource 0busentity_attr extract structure l_s_REIS_BUSENTITY_ATTR, I want to create the logic in CMOD exit_saplrsap_002 to call my function module for enhancement of master data. Please help me Step by Step
Thanks
Poonam Roy
Step #1
I put this code which gives me error in CMOD like this
ERROR : Das formale Argument 'OTHERS' muss am Schluss der Ausnahmeliste stehen.
ABAP Code#1 IN exit_saplrsap_002
DATA: l_d_fmname(30) TYPE c.
CONCATENATE 'Z_DS_' i_datasource(25) INTO l_d_fmname.
TRY.
CALL FUNCTION l_d_fmname
EXPORTING
I_DATASOURCE = I_DATASOURCE
I_UPDMODE = I_UPDMODE
TABLES
I_T_SELECT = I_T_SELECT
I_T_FIELDS = I_T_FIELDS
I_T_DATA = I_T_DATA
C_T_MESSAGES = C_T_MESSAGES
EXCEPTIONS
RSAP_CUSTOMER_EXIT_ERROR = 1
OTHERS = 2
IF FOUND.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
RASIE RSAP_CUSTOMER_EXIT_ERROR.
END IF
CATCH CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FUNC.
ENDTRY.
Step#2
I simple created the Function module Z_DS_BUSINESS
and put the code in source code which gives me error . what should i put in other tabs like"Import", Export", Tables" i kept blank
ABAP CODE give me error : The Dictionary structure or table "FIELD-SYMBOLS" is either not active. i have to remove include in the FM. WHY SO??
FUNCTION Z_DS_BUSINENSS
""Lokale Schnittstelle:
*" IMPORTING
*" VALUE(I_DATASOURCE) TYPE RSAOT_OLTPSOURCE
*" VALUE(I_CHABASNM) TYPE SBIWA_S_INTERFACE-CHABASNM
*" VALUE(I_UPDMODE) TYPE SBIWA_S_INTERFACE-UPDMODE
*" TABLES
*" I_T_SELECT TYPE SBIWA_T_SELECT
*" I_T_FIELDS TYPE SBIWA_T_FIELDS
*" I_T_DATA
*" C_T_MESSAGES STRUCTURE BALMI OPTIONAL
*" EXCEPTIONS
*" RSAP_CUSTOMER_EXIT_ERROR
INCLUDE ZXRSAU02.
WRITE: / 'INSIDE THE Z_DS_MEASUREMENTS PROGRAM'.
TABLES: REIS_BUSENTITY_ATTR,
 VIBDBE,
field-symbols:.<fs_REIS_BUSENTITY_ATTR> like REIS_BUSENTITY_ATTR.
DATA: BEGIN OF i_c_t_data OCCURS 0.
 include structure REIS_BUSENTITY_ATTR.
DATA END OF i_c_t_data.
DATA: i_c_t_data_copy like i_c_t_data OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
 begin of i_vibdbe occurs 0,
 INTRENO like vibdbe-INTRENO,
 ZFACTREG like vibdbe-ZFACTREG,
 end of i_vibdbe.
i_c_t_data_copy[] = i_c_t_data[] = c_t_data[].
sort i_c_t_data_copy by vibdbe.
Select INTRENO
 into table i_VIBDBE from VIBDBE
 for all entries in i_c_t_data_copy
 where INTRENO = i_c_t_data_copy- INTRENO.
if sy-subrc = 0.
sort i_VIBDBE by INTRENO.
loop at i_c_t_data assigning <fs_REIS_BUSENTITY_ATTR>.
 clear: i_VIBDBE.
 read table i_VIBDBE with key INTRENO = <fs_REIS_BUSENTITY_ATTR>-INTRENO
 BINARY SEARCH
 transporting ZFACTREG .
 if sy-subrc = 0.
 <fs_REIS_BUSENTITY_ATTR>-ZZFACTORY = i_vibebe-ZFACTREG
 endif.
null

(I leave office until Monday morning, Europe time)
in include from customer-exit ZXRSAU01, etc.
CASE I_DATASOURCE.
WHEN '0CUSTOMER_ATTR'.
 PERFORM 0customer_attr changing i_t_data...
ENDCASE.
In each perform, doing what you wrote ; select (needed fields) from complementary-database-table into an internal table with a for all entries. sort the table. LOOP and MODIFY on i_t_data.
In some case i had to insert lines of i_t_data to an internal table of DS_structure when entering subroutine and back at exit. (on 4.6C PI 2003 if i remember)
Some optimization done when reading small tables (T001 society and the same, these are filled once and not for each packet of data.
Your idea of creating different FM is of interest, but the cost of passing i_t_data between two programs (two function groups) may overcome the gain of performance. In a job only one DataSource is processed so only one routine is actually called.
Regards.

Master Data-Logic of dates in Master data

Dear Sapients,
In Master data what should be the Logic for BEGDA, for diff. Infotypes and the objects.
In my present project I have taken the earliest hiring date i.e, 01011985 as BEGDA. Is this logic is okie. Else what should be d logic for BEGDA-ENDDA.
In one of my master data position is assigned to cost centres, FI guy has maintained d BEGDA of cost centers from 01012007 but my position's BEGDA is 01011985, I believe it ll be a mismatch n throw error. What should be d solution for this?
Regards,
Kaushal

hai
the begda of the records always depends upon accepted date s per the requirement of the client
more precisely from which date u r going to maintain the data for the employee in sap system.
generally it is acccepted upon earlier by the client and you.
because it always difficult to maintain all the data of the employee since the icepton of the company.
so a cut off date has to be accepted upon and from that date the data will be maintained and the records will have that BEGDA
regards
nalla

Abap logic not fetching multiple rows from master data table

Hi
I just noticed that my logic is fetching only 1 row from master data table.
ProdHier table
PRODHIERACHY            Level
1000                                  1
1000011000                      2
10000110003333              3
10000110004444              3
'10000110005555              3*
logic only fetches one row of level 3, I would like to fetch all level 3 rows.
DATA: ITAB type table of /BI0/PPROD_HIER,
      wa like line of ITAB.
Select * from /BI0/PPROD_HIER INTO wa where /BIC/ZPRODHTAS = 3.
IF wa-PROD_HIER(10) = SOURCE_FIELDS-PRODH2.
     RESULT = wa-PROD_HIER.
     ELSEIF wa-PROD_HIER(5) = SOURCE_FIELDS-PRODH1.
     RESULT = wa-PROD_HIER.
ENDIF.
ENDSELECT.
thanks

Hi,,
I have implemented the logic in end routine and it still reads only the first row.
I am loading only PRODH1 and PROD2 but now I want to get all values of PRODH3 from the master data table.
The first 5 values are PRODH1 and first 10 values belongs to PRODH2.
Whenever PRODH2 = 1000011000 in source I should get the following values
10000110001110
10000110001120
10000110001130
I have multiple rows of 1000011000 so my result should be
1000011000               10000110001110
1000011000               10000110001120
1000011000               10000110001130
DATA: ITAB type table of /BI0/PPROD_HIER,
wa like line of ITAB.
data rp type _ty_s_TG_1.
Select * from /BI0/PPROD_HIER INTO table itab where /BIC/ZPRODHTAS = 3.
LOOP AT RESULT_PACKAGE INTO rp.
read table itab into wa with key PROD_HIER(5) = rp-PRODH1.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
     rp-PRODH3 = wa-PROD_HIER.
     ELSE.
read table itab into wa with key PROD_HIER(10) = rp-PRODH2.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
     rp-PRODH3 = wa-PROD_HIER.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
MODIFY RESULT_PACKAGE FROM rp.
ENDLOOP.
Edited by: Bhat Vaidya on Sep 10, 2010 11:27 AM
Edited by: Bhat Vaidya on Sep 10, 2010 11:37 AM

Master Data Logic!

Hi
Can anyone tell me what is Master Data Concept??
Tell me in clear Idea.
1. What is Direct & Flexible update??
2. How the Master Data object in ODS or Cube is loaded??
3.When we delete master data object which is used in Data Targets, why some data is not deleted?
Thanks
BI Learner

hii,
InfoSource Types
There are basically two types of InfoSources.
InfoSources with flexible updating
InfoSources with direct updating
In both cases uploaded data is transformed by the transfer rules, which have been created for the current combination of InfoSource and source system and for each InfoObject of the communication structure. A data target can be defined by several InfoSources which in turn can be defined by several source systems.
An InfoSource for hierarchies can only be defined by one source system.
For characteristics, attributes or texts, a combination of flexible and direct updating is only possible for different source systems.
InfoSources with Flexible Updating
For an InfoSource with flexible updating, the data from the communications structure is loaded into the data targets (InfoCubes, ODS objects, master data) using update rules. Several data targets can be defined by one InfoSource. The InfoSource can contain transaction data as well as master data.
This function is not implemented for hierarchies.
Before Release 3.0A only transaction data could be updated flexibly and it was only possible to update master data directly. Master data InfoSources were therefore distinguished from transaction data InfoSources. This is no longer the case as of Release BW 3.0A, since both transaction data and master data can be updated flexibly. You therefore cannot immediately see if it the InfoSource handles transaction data or master data with flexible updating. You should therefore specify which is the case when you define an InfoSource.
You have the following update options:
The data from InfoSources with master data or transaction data can be stored directly in ODS objects.
You can then update from ODS objects into further ODS objects, InfoCubes or master data tables using update rules.
It is also possible to update in InfoCubes or master data tables without having to switch between ODS objects.
InfoSources with Direct Updating
Master data (characteristics with attributes, texts or hierarchies) of an InfoObject can be updated directly (without update rules, only using transfer rules) to the master data table with an InfoSource with direct updating. To do this you must assign it application components. The characteristic is subsequently displayed in the InfoSource tree in the Administrator Workbench. You are able to assign DataSources and source systems to the characteristic from here. You are also able to load master data, texts, and hierarchies for the characteristic.
In the following cases you are not able to use an InfoObject as an InfoSource with direct updating:
The characteristic that you want to modify is characteristic 0SOURSYSTEM (source system ID).
The characteristic has neither master data, texts nor hierarchies. It is therefore impossible to load data for the characteristic.
The characteristic that you want to modify turns out to be a unit or a key figure.
To generate an export DataSource for a characteristic, the characteristic must also be an InfoSource with direct updating.
check the foll links
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b2/e50138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b2/e50138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
hope it helps,
regards,
raghu.

Periodic Transfer of Master Data

Hello,
I need assistance understanding the underlying config related to master data updates in R/3 and the resulting entries in GTS.
Our setup:
GTS (7.2) is a plug-in to CRM
CRM & R/3 in same logical system group (GTS)
EWM in unique logical system group (FEEDSYS) - based on SAP config guide and direction, we split feeder logical systems from GTS logical systems. all logical systems had resided in a single logical system group (GTS)
EWM > system for warehouse functions
R/3 > feeder system for material master
R/3 > GTS Plug-In activated (per SAP direction)
R/3 > Configure Control Settings for Document Transfer > MMOA mapped to our purchase order doc type at logical system and logical system group level
R/3 > Configure Control Settings for Document Transfer > MMOB mapped to our inbound delivery doc type (EL) at logical system and logical system group level for DTAVI
R/3 > Configure Control Settings for Document Transfer > MMOC mapped to our movement types 101 and 601, in addition to others
I mention the PO and Inbound delivery setup because we do see changes to material qty in R/3 after creating PO's and the subsequent IB deliveries.
We are trying to implement GTS as a bonded warehouse - storing material as duty-unpaid only. We are not concerned with duty-paid status for this implementation.
There has been an initial transfer of material to GTS from R/3 via /SAPSLL/MENU_LEGALR3. We have GTS master data marked as BondedWH. Although T-Code MMBE shows qty's for the material, it does not match the qty being displayed in GTS stock overview.
The SAP GTS Config guide states, page 40, to create a job for RBDMIDOC, with a variant and have it scheduled. We still need to do this part and it is my understanding this is to synce data. With this, I am also trying to understand the use of change pointers in R/3, in addition to enhancement project SLLLEG04 for the User Exits for Material Masters. I don't know if we need to worry about the SLLLEG04 enhancement or not.
I know there is more information I can provide on our current setup, but what major things are there to consider to get the stock overview qty's of GTS to actually reflect what's in MMBE, AND, be displayed as duty-unpaid, rather than duty-paid via the initial transfer function?
Any advise or experience getting R/3 to communicate correctly with GTS, especially in light of a bonded warehouse is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Brian

Hello Uwe,
Our intent for GTS is the use of bonded warehouse functionality.
As a part of preparation for go-live activities, we will stock the warehouse with material, this is a distribution center of service parts (replacement parts). The stocking activitiy will be through STO's. As a result, we expect all the material showing up in GTS to be duty-unpaid. We will continue to receive material into the warehouse via STO's as no base-receipts are required at this time.
When we process orders through the warehouse system (EWM) we expect the qty's in GTS to reflect what has been shipped (exports). As such, we will be able to reconcile any stock discrepancies with the authoriities.
My questions about intial transfer is my attempt to get some inventory showing in GTS, so that after I process the inbound deliveries based on PO's (STO) I see the inventory building in GTS.
The use of initial stock transfer may not be correct as I described my activities above, but with very little documentation specifying the actual process of establishing a bonded warehouse, especially in our landscape, I am working through this on a trial-and-error basis.
I hope this provides clarity on our goals. I will continue to research the change pointers as I am still not sure of the relevance.
Regards,
Brian

CIF of master data

Hi,
My question is related to the CIF of master data.
I built an integration model to transfer the materials from R/3 to APO, and then the delta modifications are CIF by a background process at night.
I would like to transfer all the delta master data, but having one excetption.
I do not need to transfer the safety stock delta changes in R/3 to APO, so that I maintain these values independently in APO. The issue is that the safety stock values in R/3 are also changed but with another purpose and the R/3 values are overwriting the values that I am uploading directly in APO after the delta CIF transfer.
Is there any way that I can CIF the delta master data changes in R/3, but restricting the delta safety stock changes?
Thanks a lot!

Yes it is possible. You have to add custom logic in the material CIF user exit to turn off the update of safety stock fields in APO. Actually there are a lot of threads in this forum that discuss this issue.
You can start by referring to the thread below
Re: CIF problem with Dynamic and Static Stock Method

Historic and Current data for Master data bearing objects

Hi All,
We are trying to implement type 2 dimensions for all the master data bearing characteristics, where we require historic and current data available for reporting. the master data can have a number of attributes and all of them can be time dependent. We are not getting any 'datefrom' or 'dateto' from the source system.
For example:
For Example: The table below shows data entering BI at different dates.
Source Data day of entering BI
MasterID ATTR1 ATTR2
123506 Y REWAR day1
123506 N REWAR day4
123506 Y ADJUST day4
123506 N ADJUST dayn
The field 'day of entry into BI' is only for your understanding; we do not get any date fields from the source. SID is the field we are generating for uniqueness. It is a counter. EFF_DATE would be the current date for all the data. EXP_DATE would be 31.12.9999 until the attributes change. SID and MasterID together would be the key.
On day 1 the following data enters BI,
day 1
SID MasterID ATTR1 ATTR2 EFF_DATE EXP_DATE
1 123506 Y REWAR 2/10/2009 12/31/9999
On day 4, 2 data records enter with same PID,
SID MasterID ATTR1 ATTR2 EFF_DATE EXP_DATE
2 123506 N REWAR 2/13/2009 12/31/9999
3 123506 Y ADJUST 2/13/2009 12/31/9999
the EXP_DATE of the record of day 1 needs to be changed to current date.
Also there are two records entering, so latest record would have EXP_DATE as 31.12.9999. And the EXP_DATE of the first record on day 4 should change to the current date.
so the following changes should happen,
CHANGE
SID MasterIDATTR1 ATTR2 EFF_DATE EXP_DATE
1 123506 Y REWAR 2/10/2009 2/13/2009
CHANGE
SID MasterID ATTR1 ATTR2 EFF_DATE EXP_DATE
3 123506 Y ADJUST 2/13/2009 2/22/2009
On day n, one data record enters with same PID,
SID MasterID ATTR1 ATTR2 EFF_DATE EXP_DATE
4 123506 N ADJUST 2/22/2009 12/31/9999
The change is ,
CHANGE
SID MasterID ATTR1 ATTR2 EFF_DATE EXP_DATE
3 123506 Y ADJUST 2/13/2009 2/22/2009
The data expected in P-table is as below, on Day n or after Day n, untill any other record enters for this MasterID,
1 123506 Y REWAR 2/10/2009 2/13/2009
2 123506 N REWAR 2/13/2009 2/13/2009
3 123506 Y ADJUST 2/13/2009 2/22/2009
4 123506 N ADJUST 2/22/2009 12/31/9999
Has anyone worked on type 2 dimensions earlier? Or any ideas to implement this logic would be appreciated.
Regards,
Sudeepti

Compound the Master ID with eff date and other attribute as superior objects
so you will get P-table as
ATTR1 ATTR2 MAT ID
1 2/10/2009 2/13/2009 123506 Y REWAR
2 2/13/2009 2/13/2009 123506 N REWAR
3 2/13/2009 2/22/2009 123506 Y ADJUST
4 2/22/2009 12/31/9999 123506 N ADJUST

No master data transmitted from ERP to GTS

We are using ERP 4.70 with the following settings:
SAP_APPL 470 SP-Level 0031
PI 2004_1_470 SP-Level 0016
PI_BASIS 2005_1_620 SP-Level 0017
SLL_PI 720_470 SP-Level 0007
together with SAP GTS 7.2 SP-Level 09
I created the message types /SAPSLL/DEBMAS_SLL and /SAPSLL/MATMAS_SLL manually and activated them.
I try to send an customer master data to GTS but the partner will not transmitted. In the log protocoll in GTS the error message appears that there was no data collected from table SAPSLL/TCOGVA
If I try to send a material master from ERP to GTS the RFC connection gets broken with error message:
RFC error (The transaction has dumped the connection). What I had found out is, that the error appears in the function /SAPSLL/API_1006_SYNCH_MASS.
Has this something to do maybe with a wrong IDOC type? Does I have to to something in some tables. Do I use the wrong programme? I use /SAPSLL/MATMAS_DISTRIBUTE_R3 and /SAPSLL/DEBMAS_DISTRIBUTE_R3.
I made absolutely the same customizing settings in another system at a customer and it worked fine there.
Does anybody has an idea? Thanks to all for the possible help.
Thanks very much in advance

Hi Andreas,
there are several possibilities why this is not working.
First of all you should check, if your RFC settings are correctly maintained.
Please bear in mind that the logical systems have to be assigned to logical system groups and that GTS and R/ shall not be in teh same group.
Please also ensure that the logical system name is the same in both systems, R/3 and GTS.
Secondly there is also the possibilites that necessary tables are not filled correctly.
Please run report /SAPSLL/PLUGIN_CHECK_R3
It could be thate.g. the tables TBD24 and TBD62 are not filled
for the relevant message type (in your case /SAPSLL/DEBMAS_SLL and /SAPSLL/MATMAS_SL)
To update this tables corretly pls. do the following:
- BD53
- select message type (/SAPSLL/MATMAS_SLL)and edit it
- select a segment
- save
- deselect segment again
- activate
- set in trx BD60 the FM to the correct value
(/SAPSLL/MATMAS_DISTRIBUTE_R3)
You can than check with the programm: '/SAPSLL/PLUGIN_CHECK_R3' if
all 4 required tables (TBD24, TBD62, TBDA2, TBDME) are filled, or not.
I hope this helps with the issue.

Adding new attribute to Master data - Not present in ECC

Hi,
We want to add a new field in the master data object 0plant. the new field is not present in the R/3 side. So we are planning to maintain it manually.
Is it feasible? Can someone explain how to approach the situation?
Since it is not going to come in Process chain or any of the mappings below InfoObject will the process chains work properly?
Regards

Hi
if you cant impliment any logic you cam maintani it mannually.
First add attribute to master data object and activate.
Do master data load if required.
Then right click on materdata addtribute and manage -> content tab -> Content
display complete data and you can maintain attribute values individually for all ercords one by one (will be pain even for 100 records).
another alternative is of doing file upload for this attribute.
Regards
Sudeep

Master Data transfer from SAP R/3 to SAP GTS

HI,
Master data like customer master is transferred fro R/3 to GTS. Any customer master in R/3 has many fields like company code, sales area, shipping conditions etc.
Shipping conditions and other fields are not defined in GTS. So how come when the customer master which is copied into SAP GTS is not giving any error since certain fields like shipping conditions are not there in GTS. I mean there are certain validation in R/3 for a customer . So how come these validations are being done in SAP GTS ??
regards

Customer/vendor the fields which is passed to GTS from ECC can be found in - (/SAPSLL/MENU_LEGAL - SAP Compliance Management (SPL Screening) - Logistics (Simulation of SPL - Check general address). Here you can see all the details captured for Business Partner in GTS. You can also see the entire field range at (/nbp)
When you transfer a Customer master record to GTS, in GTS an internal BP number is created to map the stated fields based on number range logic etc as per requirement. The BP's are created in GTS as per the partner role in GTS and also can be retrived using partner role. At document level the validations happen w.r.t to partner functions mapped and created as per the feeder system.

*Journal Entries while uploading the vendor master data from legacy system*

hi SAP Folks,
can any one of you tell me the journal entries while uploading the vendor master data from legacy system to SAP system.
Eg: legacy system is having 10000 vendors list, 1 reconciliation account and $ 1000000. while uploading all these data from legacy system to SAP what are the journal entries we get.
thanks in advance.
Edited by: ravindranath manikonda on Nov 24, 2008 1:12 PM

Hi
you will be having only one entry logically
i.e. Opening Bal. clrng A/c Dr.
To Vendor A/c Cr.
regards

Issue with 0hrposition master data

We are extracting data from SAP using 0HRPOSITION_ATTR datasource. I noticed that data is not maintained correctly in master data tables in BW and giving us incorrect results in reporting. Consider below mentioned scenario:
Position A created as vacant on 04/01/2006 with start date (BEGDA/ Valid from) as 04/01/2006 and End date (ENDDA/ Valid to) as 12/31/9999 and is vacant. Below mentioned entry is shown under maintain master data for 0HRPOSITION in BW:
Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
A 03/31/2006 01/01/1000
A 12/31/9999 04/01/2006 X
Position A is now delimited on 09/15/2006 as its no more required. In SAP, position has record only from 04/01/2006 till 09/15/2006 as vacant. When record is extracted in BW, it creates below mentioned entry in master data table.
Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
A 03/31/2006 01/01/1000
A 09/15/2006 04/01/2006 X
A 12/31/9999 09/16/2006 X
Entry 09/16- 12/31 is incorrect as position doesnt exist for this duration. If we report on 0HRPOSTION with key date as 09/30/2006, it shows position A as vacant though position no longer exists.
Has anyone come across this situation. any help is greatly appreciated.
Kamal
P.S: Milind Rane...I was searching through the forums and came across your post.I would appreciate if you could let me know how you solved this issue...
Message was edited by:
Kamal K

HI KK
I have a similar issue. Can you please let me know how this Issue with 0HRPOSITION_ATTR extractor was resolved. In my case i have incorrect data in BW when reporting is done. THrough the extractor untill the PSA i have the correct records coming but in the master data 0HRPOSITION i have incorrect records.
Please help.
Thanks
Hari
Message was edited by:
SAPCOOL

How to compare the data in a view with data present in a master data?

Hi All,
We have loaded some data into a Master Data Object (YMETADATA) in Development system.
Now, the same data can be present in a view RSDVCHA.
Our aim is to write a ABAP program, which would read a record from RSDVCHA and look into Master Data records and show whether it is present in the master data or not?
Has anyone written such type of code earlier, If so, please do help me out in writing this code?
Thanks in advance,
Anjum.

Hello Anjum,
It looks that the view is based on the master data table itself and view doesn't contain data and is a logical representation of the underlying database tables.
Moreover the view RSDVCHA is used for viewing the characteristics, basic chars and local properties.
Are you storing similar values in YMETADATA?
[Thanks|http://chandranonline.blogspot.com/]
[Chandran|http://chandranonline.blogspot.com/]

How to find the size of the master data objects in the BW system?

Hi,
We would like to understand the size of the master data tables overall for a specific source system (Logical name is Ex.ABCD, which supplies all master data to BW). Can you please advise the procedure to find out this?
Is there any table that will allows to see all the master data objects related to specific sources system so that we can find out that table size? Thanks.
For example, we have many Texts, Hier & Attributes.
0COUNTRY_TEXT
0REGION_TEXT
0PERSON_ATTR
0MATERIAL_LPRH_HIER
Advance Thanks.
Edited by: BW USA on Feb 2, 2010 10:52 AM

Hi,
You can find out all the master data tales used in the BW system by
Tcode : SE11
Enter as /BIC/P* for master data tables and press F4 which gives list of master data tables currently used in BW system.
Similarly for Texts /BIC/T* and press F4
Similarly for Hierarchies /BIC/H-* press F4
and can know the size of the all tables.
Thanks,
Gopal

BEGDA LOGIC IN MASTER DATA?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for