Benefits: Health plans show costs with bi-weekly rates in Enrollment screen

Hello,
I have created 2 new health plans. During testing, I noticed when trying to enroll employees via the Enrollment screen, the plan options show costs with bi-weekly rates rather than monthly rates. For these health plans, I had set the cost variants and costs rules to "Monthly." Is there another setting somewhere that I am missing? Please advise- thanks

The benefit payment model assignment is configured in view V_T74HE (note VARGU is getting from feature MODDE). You can check this payment model through view V_T549W to see what period parameter it's set to (PERMO). It's probably currently set to 'bi-weekly' instead of 'Monthly' in your system.
Rgds.

Similar Messages

Benefits Health Plans Deductions are not working

Hi All,
I configured health plans successfully and i am able to see all of my health plas from Open Enrollment and when i was trying to enroll into plans, the plans are showing wrong deduction amount for all my health plans.
Instead of deducting one dollar, it is deducting 4 dollars
Instead of deducting 3 dollars, it is deducting 12 dollars.
so each and every deduction amount is multiplied by 4.
I was checking each and every table, i haven't find any thing wrong, some one please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Abhiram.

Hi Keeran,
In the standard the contribution are taken depending on the employee pay period (payroll area). But I think you might be able to modify this process via a user exit, the best for your scenatrio, I think, is the one below:
Definition name PBEN_PAY0006
Definition short text Country exit for determination of EE contribution fixed per.
Hope this help
Sarah

Query plan shows Cost: 0 Bytes: 851 Cardinality: 1

Hi,
Customer running 10.2.0.4 on linux 64 bit.
Explain plan shows:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 0 Bytes: 851 Cardinality: 1
8 FILTER
7 SORT ORDER BY Bytes: 851 Cardinality: 1
6 HASH JOIN OUTER Cost: 2,873,137 Bytes: 5,047,622,251 Cardinality: 5,931,401
4 HASH JOIN Cost: 1,696,501 Bytes: 4,567,178,770 Cardinality: 5,931,401
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE LIVE.INSTRUMENT Cost: 212,073 Bytes: 679,589,280 Cardinality: 1,595,280
3 PARTITION RANGE ALL Cost: 764,856 Bytes: 2,040,401,944 Cardinality: 5,931,401 Partition #: 6 Partitions accessed #1 - #27
2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE LIVE.DEALTRANS Cost: 764,856 Bytes: 2,040,401,944 Cardinality: 5,931,401 Partition #: 6 Partitions accessed #1 - #27
5 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE LIVE.SMDBINSTRUMENT Cost: 1,169 Bytes: 4,958,172 Cardinality: 61,212
I understand that explain plans can be unreliable but:
1) why does cost show as 0? Its obviously much higher. Is there just not enough room?
2) why a cardinality of 1?
Thanks in advance,
Steve

Hi Someoneelse,
Not sure, i have a query into the client.
Thanks for responding.
Steve

MM Planned Freight Costs with

Dear friend
Does anyone could guide me to setting up the freight costs by condition FRB1 to ECC put the value of condition as part of costs of material !
Could you explain the behavior of MIRO(Accounting posting) with main item together with planned freight costs !
We need to understand how the SAP input the freight costs into the main item.
best regards,
Ale

Hi Aless,
U have to inventorise freight condition
This can be done by assigning accrual key in m/06
in condition mark tick as accrual..
Other than the Basic price all other condition types can be inventories. for this u have to do the following. at M/08 ( Pricing Procedure) You have to Flag Statistical Indicator(S) and you should give appropriate Account key and Accurals key( exampl FR1, FRE for Freight) and at M/06( condition type) for particular condition type u have to Flag Accurals an control data 2. If u do all the 4 then any condition type can be inventorised as per the business requiredment.

Satellite A660-17T - PC Health Monitor shows problem with battery health

I have an A660-17T which I've had since November 2010, I've used it a fair amount but not always on battery, I'd estimate that the battery has between 10 and 20 charge/discharge cycles on it.
I updated the BIOS to v1.80 when I first got the laptop, everything seemed to be fine. Recently, within the last 2-3 weeks the health monitor software is reporting that the battery is in poor health, showing that the capacity is reduced to 40% of the original capacity. I don't believe this as when I do run on battery I get several hours usage.
I have today updated to BIOS v1.90, although there is no changelog that I can find, it just says "improved features" or similar.
Is this really a failing battery, or is it somehow that the software is incorrectly reading the value of capacity from the battery pack due to a change in Windows or some other change in the system? I can't see how a battery can run for the same amount of time it always did and actually have a fault.
Any thoughts? Should I go back to the retailer and report this as a fault, or is it worth waiting to see if a future OS or driver update fixes this?
Thoughts welcome!

Hey,
> I don't believe this as when I do run on battery I get several hours usage.
That means you have the same battery remaining time as before you saw the error message from PC health monitor?!
In this case it seems that the battery is ok and maybe its just wrong information from the Toshiba tool. So I would recommend reinstalling PC Health Monitor that you can download from official Toshiba website:
http://eu.computers.toshiba-europe.com > Support & Downloads

Infotype 0167 - health plans : cost : employee credit

Hi Gurus,
I need your help!
In the infotype 167, I need to change the value for the employee credit.
We changed our insurance company in 2007, so we need to update the data in this infotype.
Iu2019ll give you an example:
Before the change, the value of employee credit was 10u20AC, and now itu2019s 9u20AC. We need to see the new value (9u20AC) in infotype 167, but we want to keep the old value saved.
If we make that change at IMG (personnel management/ benefits/ plans/ health plans/ define cost rules) the system only show the oldest value (at the infotype).
Is there any way to keep the both values at IMG, but just show the last one(9u20AC) in infotype 167.
Thanks a lot!
PC

Hello,
I really appreciate your help, I have already tried this, but it didnu2019t work.
The value that appears in the infotype 167, it's always the oldest, and we need to see the newest.
Thanks,
PC

Problem with MIRO Transaction while posting Un planned Delivery cost

Hi all,
We have entered all the details including unplanned delivery cost in transaction MIRO. When we are trying to post the same by using post button directly with out simulation, system is asking for plant details.
For first time we have entered wrong Plant details , system immediately asking again for plant details.
Next time even if we entered correct plant details, the system is coming out from the screen MIRO and it is not posting the document.
If you go through simulate button and it is working fine and it is giving Warning message, If we enter the wrong Plant details.
My Client requirement is If we post the MIRO transaction including Un planned delivery cost with Post button. If we enter wrong plant details. System will through Error message, until we enter the correct plant details.
Is there any way to do this. Pl help me in this regard.
Regards,
Ramesh

In the MIRO T Code, U can see PO reference tab is there, Just below it there is Purchase order/scheduling agreement field is there . enter the purchase order number in blank field next to Purchase order/scheduling agreement and press enter. U can see it will take the required data automatically.
hope this helps
regards

MIRO for Planned delivery cost

Hello,
Its Raw material PO with Freight & unloading Charges codition.Excise duty applicable only for Raw material .
service tax applicable for Freight & unloading charges vendor.
while booking MIRO for Raw material ,excise accounts should be hit & for Planned delivery cost service accounts shoud hit.
but While Posting Planned delivery cost tax code for which sevice tax code has been used, excise offset account is getting Posted together with service tax accounts.
How to Post MIRO for Planned delivery cost with only service tax accounts.
Regards,
Jyoti

Hi Deva,
Is the problem about the rounding of the value?
If so I sugest you modify the rounding scheme of the conditions to 'round up' in the condition master. In this case 0,004 would become 0,01. It's important to know that currency is always posted with two decimal numbers, but you can always do this: 1000units cost 4$ (for example).
For what I know you cannot post a value in invoices for less than 0,01$.
Give more feedback.

How to select Dependants in IT0167 for Benefits Coverage of Health Plan

Hi
How to add Employee's dependents in IT0167 for Health Plan Benefits Coverage? Are there any specific configuration steps to be included: I have configured the below
Define Options for Health Plan: EMPL (Employee only) & EMFL (Employee+Family)
Define Dependant Coverage Options: EE (Employee only) & EEF (EmployeeFamily)
Define Min & Max No of Dependants: Coverage option EE+F
1 Spouse 1 1
2 Child 1 8
All the other activities in SPRO are completed - but when I trying to enroll employees with Family coverage, I am not able to see the Dependants information in IT0167 in Depents Tab
Please help me to fix this
Regards

Hi,
Please check if you have configured the below nodes:
Benefits
Flexible Administration
Dependent/Beneficiary Eligibility
-Define Family Member Groupings
- Define Dependent Eligibility Rule Variants
- Define Dependent Eligibility Rules
- Assign Eligibility Rule Variant to Plan
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Anand Jalan

Health Plan Dependants -Benefits

Hi All,
Health Plans are not allowing certain dependants to be selected.
for example : for options Employee + Partner &
Employee + Family we need to have Domestic Partner (13) added as an option
I look in the table V_T74HR & configured the subtype for the above two options.
I wanted to know is there any more settings or config required apart from above table?
Please guide on same... as i am not much familiar with Benefits part.
Thanks & regds,
Nithi

Hi,
Please check if you have configured the below nodes:
Benefits
Flexible Administration
Dependent/Beneficiary Eligibility
-Define Family Member Groupings
- Define Dependent Eligibility Rule Variants
- Define Dependent Eligibility Rules
- Assign Eligibility Rule Variant to Plan
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Anand Jalan

Raw Material Costing with Overhead, Product Cost Planning

Hi,
I have an issue applying overhead to purchased raw materials. We need to apply this overhead for only a certain materials. So, I have defined a overhead key/overhead Group, and assigned the group in the material master of the raw material. The overhead is 2% freight on raw material costs.
In the std.costing variant, I have assigned the costing sheet under Overhead on material components tab of the corresponding valuation variant. I have also included the Freight OH in the cost component structure.
However, when I run the costing with CK11N for the raw material, it is showing only the raw material cost, not the overhead.
What could be the problem?
I appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Ram

Is the overhead rate a percentage type or quantity based?
Have you maintained both actual and plan rates (1 & 2) under define % based OH rates or Qty based OH rates accordingly?
Does the validity date (in define OH rates )cover the date of costing?
Is the Costing sheet assigned to the valuation variant at plant level?
Is the OH base in the costing sheet includes the cost element of the raw material?

Issue with reversal of MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

Hi Xperts
We have found out an issue while reversing the MIRO document for Planned Del costs. When we have done the MIRO, the accounting entry got correctly posted with correct account keys.Conditions are not inventoried.
However, when we had reversed it - the stock account got hit.Do not understand, why that happened.Do you have any clue?
1. Suppose we have done the MIRO for Del Cost & then performed GR.Now Stock has already consumed & afterwards we have found that the MIRO for Del Cost is wrong & reverse - in this scenario shall the Stock account will get a hit????
2. I have maintained Price Control "V" in Material Master.However, I have maintained a Standard Price by mistake.In that case shall SAP ignores the MAP & takes Standard Price into account & post PRD??
Regards
Soumick

Hi,
Before checking Planned Delivery costs accounting documents in MIRO posting and MIRO cancellation document, 1st check how Planned Delivery costs designed for your procurement process.
Use t.code:ME23N, check your Purchase order
Option-1:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account and at the same time Planned Delivery costs posted to Separate Planned Delivery costs G/L account.
OR
Option-2:
Is Planned Delivery costs posted to Planned Delivery costs G/L account ONLY
OR
Option-3:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account ONLY.
Based the above one setting, system will post goods receipt and invoice posting document with corresponding accounting entries. Also cancellation of invoice posting document refer to these setting.But account posting depends on price control available in material master.
NOTE:
Standard price procedure (price control “S”):The system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances in price are posted to price difference accounts.
Moving average price (price control “V”): The system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.Differences in price between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
Regards,
Biju K

ERS for Return Items with Planned Delivery Costs also as credit

Hi
I have the requirement to process ERS-Returns (MRRL) where I need to have a credit memo for the product cost and the planned delivery costs incurred with the original order. ($15,000 for product and $1200 for delivery costs = Credit Memo for $16,200) I have tested this extensively but in all situations the planned delivery costs creates an 'invoice' not a credit memo.
Has anybody encountered this requirement? If so, were you able to resolve without implementing an enhancement?
Thanks.

For delivery costs you need to maintain the following customizing:
> OLMR
    > Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)
      > Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs
The flag controls whether to include or exclude planned delivery costs
from automatic settlement.
Regarding the planned delivery cost, it will not listed in
transaction MRRL. This is the standard SAP design. Instead, please
use transaction MRDC.

HT5100 I changed my course description last week but it still hasn't showed up with the changes in iTunes. When you download the course it is correct. Is there something I am missing?

I changed my course description last week but it still hasn't showed up with the changes in iTunes. When you download the course it is correct. Is there something I am missing?

Since the maximum OS X version for an eMac is 10.5, how are you running OS X 10.7.5 on the eMac?
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1591

How can i calculate my planned and actual labour cost with fields from tab

Hi,
i want to calculate my planned labour cost for all operations in my production order. how can i retrive form the tables and how the actual planned cost gets calcualted. where can i see the overhed calcualtion of the material and labour.
please suggest.
regards
madan

Hi,
Planned cost is nothing but the Standard values which you give for each opearation in the routing.
The actual values from the confirmation for production order
The following table and fields you can get the values
PLPO, AFVC - look for setup time,labor time,machine time fields
AFRU - look for the required fields setup,labor,mcahine time etc
Thanks and regards
Murugesa

Benefits: Health plans show costs with bi-weekly rates in Enrollment screen

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for