Benefits Management Enrollment problem

Hi.
I'm doing on Benefits Management, Health Plans.
I have finished doing all the configuration under spro for health plans. But under Enrollment, i can't find any of my health plans. And so i can't enroll..
When i click on the error list, it said that 'No entry found in the adjustment authorization table'.
Can i know whether anyone knows how to solve it? Thanks.

Hi,
You have probably configure both plan under same plan category and that only allow to enroll a person in just one. You have to configure it in different category under the same attributes.
There is also an activity in spro under Flexible Administration called Prerequisites and Corequisites. Check that out, but the issue may be in what I mentión aboved.
Regards,
Edoardo

Similar Messages

Benefits Plans Enrollment Problem in ECC

Hi All,
I have two insurance plans and i configured two insurance plans and i attached to one insurance plan type and i am able to see my insurance plans in my Benefits Enrollment screen (HRBEN0001).
Now my problem is: i am not able to enroll two plans one after another, if i am able to enroll one plan then i am not able to enroll in another plan, so only one plan is allowed to enroll.
Could you please some one tell me where did i mistake, and i am new to this Benefits configuration.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Abhi.

Hi,
You have probably configure both plan under same plan category and that only allow to enroll a person in just one. You have to configure it in different category under the same attributes.
There is also an activity in spro under Flexible Administration called Prerequisites and Corequisites. Check that out, but the issue may be in what I mentión aboved.
Regards,
Edoardo

ESS Webdynpro Benefits Open Enrollment

We currently have the ITS application for benefits open enrollment (PZ14) up and running. We are trying to setup the Webdynpro service for Open Enrollment.
We are on ECC 6.0, EP 7.0 latest SPs and we are using XSS 600 webdynpro Software Components.
Problem:
When we click on Open Enrollment service (Webdynpro), the following message comes up:
No plan selections could be prepared for the specified enrollment reason. Contact your Benefits Administrator for assistance.
The same service works fine with the ITS service for the same PERNR. The ITS service is able to show up the Open Enrollment without any problem.
Even if I include an entry in Infotype 0378 Adjustment Reasons, the new enrollment reason can be seen under the ITS Service but not under the webdynpro service.
Is there any additional customization (configuration) required for the Webdynpro Service for Open Enrollment.
thanks,

Experiencing the same issue. Did someone find a solution to this?
Thanks!

Change Server URL in Profile Manager Enrollment Process?

It appears devices learn the IP or URL of their MDM server during the Profile Manager enrollment process. It must be part of the configuration profile sent to the device. It also appears this is based on the machine's host name. Is there anyway to change that URL - as when the host name of the server changes? If so, where are the files located on the server.
I believe in the previous iPhone Configuration Utility there was a "server URL" and "Check in URL" that could be set. We can't seem to find any parameters in Profile Manger to control the same. Thanks for any help.

Hi Jonathan,
I stumbled on your responses because I was looking for an answer to my own issues.
I am like most just a lay user, although wth 20 years Mac experience.
The issue is as folllows:
I set up Lion Server and I host a Wiki page and I try to run Profile Manager.
I do not have a registered host name. The hostname is server.name.private.
In order to reach the server from the Internet my clients use a DynDNS hostname such as "name.dyndns.org".
My clients can access the Wiki pages with no problems and Safari shows https://name.dyndns.org in the address line.
However, if they want to connect to Profile manager, the server re-directs https://name.dyndns.org/profilemanager https://server.name.private/auth?redirect=https://server.name.private/devicemana gement/api/authentication/callback
which the client's browser cannot resolve because the internal hostname is unknown to public DNS servers.
Why does Profile Manager redirect in the first place ?
Can this issue be resolved without obtaining an "officially registered" hostname ?
Thank you for helping.
Regards,
Twistan

[Fwd: Starting Managed server problem ......]

Forwarding to the security news group...
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Starting Managed server problem ......
Date: 1 Jun 2004 23:02:53 -0700
From: Sameer <barsatkiraat2001>
Newsgroups: weblogic.developer.interest.management
Hi All,
I need you guy's help in this regard, that I am using solaris 8 and
installed Weblogic8.1 Server.
My Scenario is;
Have configured Admin Server and Managed server with nodemanager on one
unix machine.
So, what am facing the problem;
I am not able to get run Managed server after starting the nodemanager
and admin server, getting the error in nodemanager logs that is :
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Warning> <Security> <BEA-090482>
<BAD_CERTIFICATE alert was received from PortalQA - 10.12.10.94. Check
the peer to determine why it rejected the certificate chain (trusted CA
configuration, hostname verification). SSL debug tracing may be required
to determine the exact reason the certificate was rejected.>
And in Admin Server logs it's saying;
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Warning> <Security> <BEA-090504>
<Certificate chain received from PortalQA - 10.12.10.94 failed hostname
verification check. Certificate contained AdminQA but check expected
PortalQA>
The WebLogic Server did not start up properly.
Exception raised:
'weblogic.management.configuration.ConfigurationException: Due to faulty
SSL configuration, this server is unable to establish a connection to
the node manager.'
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Warning> <NodeManager> <BEA-300038>
<The node manager is unable to monitor this server. Could not create an
SSL connection to the node manager. Reason :
[Security:090504]Certificate chain received from PortalQA - 10.12.10.94
failed hostname verification check. Certificate contained AdminQA but
check expected PortalQA>
Reason: weblogic.management.configuration.ConfigurationException: Due to
faulty SSL configuration, this server is unable to establish a
connection to the node manager.
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Emergency> <WebLogicServer>
<BEA-000342> <Unable to initialize the server:
weblogic.management.configuration.ConfigurationException: Due to faulty
SSL configuration, this server is unable to establish a connection to
the node manager.>
If some one can help me, I do appreciate in all due respect.
Sameer.

Hello Satya/All,
I'm also experiencing the exact problem you are facing. It would be great if
somebody could help in this regard at the earliest.
Thanks, senthil
Satya Ghattu <[email protected]> wrote:
Forwarding to the security news group...
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Starting Managed server problem ......
Date: 1 Jun 2004 23:02:53 -0700
From: Sameer <barsatkiraat2001>
Newsgroups: weblogic.developer.interest.management
Hi All,
I need you guy's help in this regard, that I am using solaris 8 and
installed Weblogic8.1 Server.
My Scenario is;
Have configured Admin Server and Managed server with nodemanager on one
unix machine.
So, what am facing the problem;
I am not able to get run Managed server after starting the nodemanager
and admin server, getting the error in nodemanager logs that is :
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Warning> <Security> <BEA-090482>
<BAD_CERTIFICATE alert was received from PortalQA - 10.12.10.94. Check
the peer to determine why it rejected the certificate chain (trusted
CA
configuration, hostname verification). SSL debug tracing may be required
to determine the exact reason the certificate was rejected.>
And in Admin Server logs it's saying;
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Warning> <Security> <BEA-090504>
<Certificate chain received from PortalQA - 10.12.10.94 failed hostname
verification check. Certificate contained AdminQA but check expected
PortalQA>
The WebLogic Server did not start up properly.
Exception raised:
'weblogic.management.configuration.ConfigurationException: Due to faulty
SSL configuration, this server is unable to establish a connection to
the node manager.'
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Warning> <NodeManager> <BEA-300038>
<The node manager is unable to monitor this server. Could not create
an
SSL connection to the node manager. Reason :
[Security:090504]Certificate chain received from PortalQA - 10.12.10.94
failed hostname verification check. Certificate contained AdminQA but
check expected PortalQA>
Reason: weblogic.management.configuration.ConfigurationException: Due
to
faulty SSL configuration, this server is unable to establish a
connection to the node manager.
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Emergency> <WebLogicServer>
<BEA-000342> <Unable to initialize the server:
weblogic.management.configuration.ConfigurationException: Due to faulty
SSL configuration, this server is unable to establish a connection to
the node manager.>
If some one can help me, I do appreciate in all due respect.
Sameer.

ESS Benefits Generic Enrollment - Different behavior backend v/s portal

We are using the ESS Benefits generic enrollment service for enrollment kicking off the adjustment reasons on IT 0378.
Here is the configuration set up, trying to simplify to explain the matter. We are on ECC 6.0 with EHP2.
1. Configured one plan type in savings category.
2. Within this plan type, configured 2 plans.
3. Configured all other related configuration to set up the 2 plans.
4. Configured the adjustment reason and the appropriate plan type created in step 2.
5. Created the required adjustment reason on 378.
In HRBEN0001 transaction via backendwe can see the 2 plans configured within the plan type.
But when Trying to enroll from ESS - only one plan can be seen for that plan type, the other plan is not shown at all.
OK - eventually, debugged and found this piece of code in FM HR_BEN_ESS_FILL_SELECTION_DISP. The 2 different plans are there until this piece of code takes one of them Off...
CODE -
3.) Reduce entries to one entry per type and period
delete adjacent duplicates from selection_display_gt
    comparing pernr
              barea
              bpcat
              pltyp
              begda
              sprps.
CODE -
This FM is called only for ESS application and not for backed program.
What we do not understand is why is it behaving differntly on backend v/s portal.
Any information or experience with this form any one of you will be highly appreciated.
Thanks.

Siddharth,
Thanks for your reply. Yes ESS has its own FMs. The UI, user exits, BADIs etc are different for backend v/s front end.
What we are not clear with, is the different behavior in core functionality -- i.e. When the adjustment reason is processed from the backend using HRBEN0001 - The 2 plans within the Plan Type are available for elections. BUT the same adjustment reason for the same penr when processed from ESS - there is just one plan available for elections.
It's clear from the code, that it is deleting one plan and this code is within the FM which is called only from ESS. But we are still not sure why it should behave differently i.e. 2 plans via backend v/s one plan via ESS.
Wanted to see if anyone can share any information if they have a similar benefits set up .. 2 plans within one plan type FOR savings plan category and then having a adjustment reason set up.
Regards.

X220 Fingerprint enrollment problems post domain migration

We recently reinstalled our 2008 R2 domain moving it from a SBS to a full server environment. We maintained the original domain name and re-created the users with the same credentials. I am using a X220 which runs Win7-64.
Following the joining on the new domain my fingerprint continued to work and log me on to the new domain however it wasn't behaving properly within Internet explorer continually asking for my password to be re-entered so I decided to try re-enrol all fingerprints. I used the Lenovo fingerprint software and the first thing that stood out was that there appeared to be no fingerprint to delete when I logged on, however when I went into the configuration it has the option to manage enrolled fingerprints. It showed nothing however it showed that I had 19 free enrolments still possible. After I exited from this screen I now had the option to delete previously enrolled fingerprints which I clicked on and chose all rather than the my user options.
Following this I rebooted and went into the bios and selected to erase the fingerprint reader within the bios and rebooted back into the system. At the logon screen it advised me no fingerprints were registered and that I should enrol some. I logged in manually and went to the fingerprint enrolment assuming everything was now reset. I then attempted to enrol my right index finger and the system advised me the finger was already enrolled, so I went back to fingerprint management option which still showed no detail however it now shows 21 free fingers. I noticed also that my left index finger is enrolled however I am free to enrol other fingers.
I now ensured that I had the latest Client Security Solution software 8.30.0.53-64 and Fingerprint software 5.9.5-64 and still I have the same issue. I have even fully uninstalled the fingerprint software and used the Windows biometric software which also reflects no finger prints however when I try enrol those fingers it advises already enrolled?
What do I do?

We recently reinstalled our 2008 R2 domain moving it from a SBS to a full server environment. We maintained the original domain name and re-created the users with the same credentials. I am using a X220 which runs Win7-64.
Following the joining on the new domain my fingerprint continued to work and log me on to the new domain however it wasn't behaving properly within Internet explorer continually asking for my password to be re-entered so I decided to try re-enrol all fingerprints. I used the Lenovo fingerprint software and the first thing that stood out was that there appeared to be no fingerprint to delete when I logged on, however when I went into the configuration it has the option to manage enrolled fingerprints. It showed nothing however it showed that I had 19 free enrolments still possible. After I exited from this screen I now had the option to delete previously enrolled fingerprints which I clicked on and chose all rather than the my user options.
Following this I rebooted and went into the bios and selected to erase the fingerprint reader within the bios and rebooted back into the system. At the logon screen it advised me no fingerprints were registered and that I should enrol some. I logged in manually and went to the fingerprint enrolment assuming everything was now reset. I then attempted to enrol my right index finger and the system advised me the finger was already enrolled, so I went back to fingerprint management option which still showed no detail however it now shows 21 free fingers. I noticed also that my left index finger is enrolled however I am free to enrol other fingers.
I now ensured that I had the latest Client Security Solution software 8.30.0.53-64 and Fingerprint software 5.9.5-64 and still I have the same issue. I have even fully uninstalled the fingerprint software and used the Windows biometric software which also reflects no finger prints however when I try enrol those fingers it advises already enrolled?
What do I do?

ESS Benefits open enrollment - Issue

Hi,
When we click on the benefits open enrollment link, we do not want some of the plans to be displayed to the ess user. Is there any way to control it ( SPRO or BAdI ).
Env - EP 7.0, ECC6.0
Thanks,
Ravi

I posed the same question to an ESS consultant who responded with the following:
"The plans presented in benefits enrollment (PZ14) and Participation Overview (PZ07) are list output from ABAP. You can go into the program and select or exclude some of them based on certain criteria. I've seen customers extend the Plan infotype to add a flag field to make it configurable to show, not show a given plan."
Since specific instructions weren't given, I wouldn't consider the issue answered.
However, I can provide the following work around:
Due to the fact that different populations have different open enrollment period timeframes, and all populations have been configured under one benefit area...we decided to create an "Open Enrollment Adjustment Reason" for each group instead. Thus, the Adjustment Reason permissions will only display the plans we want the employee to see via ESS. Prior to the open enrollment period for the population, we will run the Mass Adjustment Reason report to create IT378 for all relevant employees. The OE offer will appear as another Adjustment Reason under the Enrollment service in ESS.

Regd:Benefits Open Enrollment Issue

Hi SAP,
I have problem in Open Enrollment which is in ESS.
We have used the Portal Navigation for designing the Navigation instead of Homepage Framework.
When we were using Homepage frame work the open Enrollment works fine(ie) it will be highlighted when the period is opened and it will be glared when the period is closed.
But now after changing the navigation design it is working fine when the period is open but its not getting blared or disabled when it is closed instead it gives me the error.
I need to make it disable when the period is closed.
Is there any configuration that I have to do.
Please put me some light on it.
Its very urgent.

I posed the same question to an ESS consultant who responded with the following:
"The plans presented in benefits enrollment (PZ14) and Participation Overview (PZ07) are list output from ABAP. You can go into the program and select or exclude some of them based on certain criteria. I've seen customers extend the Plan infotype to add a flag field to make it configurable to show, not show a given plan."
Since specific instructions weren't given, I wouldn't consider the issue answered.
However, I can provide the following work around:
Due to the fact that different populations have different open enrollment period timeframes, and all populations have been configured under one benefit area...we decided to create an "Open Enrollment Adjustment Reason" for each group instead. Thus, the Adjustment Reason permissions will only display the plans we want the employee to see via ESS. Prior to the open enrollment period for the population, we will run the Mass Adjustment Reason report to create IT378 for all relevant employees. The OE offer will appear as another Adjustment Reason under the Enrollment service in ESS.

FCP 6, Media Manager, DualEyes Problem

I've locked picture on a 90 minute feature and I'm trying to export the sequence to an external drive so our colorist can do the grading.
The camera original footage came from various Canon DSLRs. Some of the footage was transcoded (Pro Res 422 HQ) off site and delivered to me. But most of the footage, I transcoded myself, using log and transfer.
I highlight the sequence I want to export in the FCP browser, then right click, but when I click “Media Manager”, nothing happens. The little icon spins for a split second, then nothing.
The same thing happens if I try to open Media Manager from the top menu. Nothing. Won’t open.
Everything in the timeline plays just fine. Exporting the timeline as a self-contained or reference file works without any problem.
It seems Media Manager doesn't like certain clips in the timeline.
I went through the timeline one clip at a time and started to compare the clips MM had a problem with versus those it didn't have a problem with.
It seems the offending clips are all clips that were created in DualEyes, off site, to sync second system audio.
Clips that I synched here, on site, using PluralEyes, do not offend Media Manager.
I don't know that this matters, but...
The offending DualEyes-created files that were created off site include a single, merged file - a video track and three audio tracks (a pair of tracks from the second system audio, and a single track from the camera mic that was used for reference).
One last thing I tried to confirm it was the created-off-site DualEyes files that were keeping MM from working...
I imported two files, residing in the same folder on the HD.
File A had been synched using DualEyes. It has a video track and three audio tracks (one from camera mic, two from second system audio).
File B had not been synched (an MOS take). It has a video track and two audio tracks (camera mic).
I laid both clips in the timeline, next to each other.
If I right click on File A and then click Media Manager, I get an "Error 34" message.
If I right click on File B and then click Media Manager, Media Manager opens normally.
Any idea what's going on here? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
I'm running...
Final Cut Pro 6.0.6
2.4GHz 8-Core MacPro
6 GB RAM
OSX 10.6.8
8TB G-Tech esPRO RAID 5 (4.8 TBs used)
Cheers,
Jeffrey

I have no idea why this problem is occuring, but you might try deleting the audio from your sequence before doing the media manage. You could then copy a mixed down track to the media managed sequence if you want audio reference.
Also, select one of the problematic clips and hit command-9 (clip settings) and tell us the settings for the clip.

Batch Management (ROH) - Problem

Hi,
We have activated Batch Management for Raw Materials.
I have done the following Configurations for PP Module.
1. Maintained Batch Mngt settings in ROH in MRP2, entry "3"
2. Strategy Type in SPRO
2. Search Procedure in OPLG
3. Maintained Search procedure in OPL8
4. Maintained Condition for that ROH in COB1
Now the problem is :
We have created 4 batches with some qty.
1st Production order: The batch determination is taking place properly, and Batch 1 gets consumed.
2nd Production order: The batch determination taking place properly, but the 1st Batch which has no qty. is being seen with EMPTY Field for QTY, and the Batch No. field is GREYED (non-editable).
Question:
Why the BLANK Batch is appearing, as because of which i am getting a error in costing "Consumption account cannot be determined", Area of responsibility as FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING.
But why should the BLANK FIELD APPEAR ?
please provide valuable inputs
Thanks in advance,
Harris

Hello Brahmankar Sir,
I checked up, but since the Costing error is coming in the production order itself, hence it is not allowing for the confirmation, and is getting terminated in the confirmation stage itself.
One thing i came to know is that the BLANK field which is seen, when checked its Item Details, is showing as movement No. 531.
What can be the reason for the same ?
Requesting your kind input.
Also the batch No. for the BLANK field Line item is seen as 1.
Item Component       Qty.                                                     Batch No.                Batch
0010     R18                               EA     L     0010     0     100     1051                              1
0010     R18                  10      EA     L     0010     0     100     1051        0000000004               2
Requesting your kind inputs.
Thanks and regards,
Harris

Solution Manager 3.2 SP 8- Change Request Management Configuration Problem

Hi friends,
We are in process of implementing SOLMAN 3.2 SP8 in our landscape.I am facing problem in configuring change request management.
When the developer is working on an urgent correction document we are facing a problem.The steps we are following are here under provided.
Step 1 :
Selected Action "In development" - > it created the transport request in the dev system.
Step 2:
Action "Log into System" -> made correction attached to the transport request manually and released the task.
Step 3:
Action "Release transport requests" -> The transport request in the development was released.
Step 4:
Went for action "Pass to correction" -> I am facing exceptions which conveys
Status was reset by system
A condition is not satisfied because of an exceptional situation
Not all transport requests yet released
And we would be thankful if you provide the authorization required for the different roles in the change request management.I have followed the help file of SOLMAN 3.2 and create the users as under
User - Role
SOCM_RQSTR - ZSAP_SOCM_REQUESTER
(Derrived from SAP_SOCM_REQUESTER)
SOCM_DVLPR - ZSAP_SOCM_DEVELOPER
(Derrived from SAP_SOCM_DEVELOPER)
SOCM_CHNGNGR - ZSAP_SOCM_CHANGE_MANAGER
(Derrived from SAP_SOCM_CHANGE_MANAGER)
SOCM_CHNGNGR - ZSAP_SOCM_IT_OPERATOR
(Derrived from SAP_SOCM_IT_OPERATOR)
Even then I am facing problems while developer creating transport requests and while logging into development system.
I tried adding S_RFC,S_RFCACL auth objects to their roles but did not help.
Pl. suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Mrutyunjay
Message was edited by: Mrutyunjay Rao Dora

Hi all,
We are trying to implement the Change Request Management piece in Solution Manager 3.2.
We are facing the following issues which I think relate to the same reason:
1)We have created a Maintenance Project in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN and assigned it a logical component, which consists of our two system landscape (namely DEVàQAS). We have also created the IMG project in the DEV system and have distributed that IMG project to both the Solution manager system and the DEV system. Now we have to make the maintenance cycle and task list for that maintenance project, but as we select the project and click on create project cycle it shows the message "The project is not released. Hence cycle can not be created". It is showing the status of project as locked .How can we open or unlock the project to remove the error?
2) Also after selecting the SMI project when we click on the button CTS status switches or project specific Transport route it responds with the error "Project landscape not configured; set the project status to "open" first ".
3)When we click on synchronize single project it prompts for the login of connected system (Development System) and after login, it gives an error "Warning, problems during synchronization of the system Landscape".
For Error resolution, we have checked the system landscape and it does not give us any errors. We have done that, both from the solution manager by going to the transaction SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN --> >system landscape tab>selecting our logical component and doing a check by clicking the "Check system Landscape" button. It returns with "no Errors". We also did a check on the TMS configuration by logging directly on to the TMS domain controller system and checking the Transport routes. We have checked the RFC connections without any errors.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Abhi

Management console problem after installing recommended patch cluster

Hello everyone.
I just got a new SUN 440 server, it didn't come with the solaris os installed and so I installed solaris 9 12/03 to it. The installation went fine and I could start the management console with no problems at all. Then I went to sunsolve.sun.com to download the latest recommended patch clusters for solaris 9 (this was yesterday Sept.-06-2006), I downloaded the file, checked it with md5sum, unzipped it, went to single user mode and ran the install_patch script. After the patch cluster finished installing I rebooted the server for the patches to take effect, I logged in, tried to run console management 2.1 and it starts OK but I cannot use any services it offers because it says (in the console events):
"Server Not Running: no solaris management console server was available on the specified server. Please ensure there is a Solaris Management Console server available on the specified host and that it is running"
When I click on "See Exception" I get (for a particular service that is... in this case com.sun.admin.fsmgr.client.VFsMgr - for managing file systems):
java.rmi.RemoteException: Server RMI is null:
at sun.com.management.viperimpl.client.ViperClient.lookupServer(ViperClient.java:376)and so on...
I already checked that the service is running on port 898 and it seems that there is no other app. using that same port. I also restarted the service using /etc/init.d.init stop/status/start but I get the same results.
I don't know solaris very much and don't know what else to do, please help.
Thanks in advance.

Well, I guess what you see isn't what you get.
Guess I'm used to the fact USENET just left things formatted the way they were :-O

Starting Managed server problem ......

Hi All,
I need you guy's help in this regard, that I am using solaris 8 and installed Weblogic8.1 Server.
My Scenario is;
Have configured Admin Server and Managed server with nodemanager on one unix machine.
So, what am facing the problem;
I am not able to get run Managed server after starting the nodemanager and admin server, getting the error in nodemanager logs that is :
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Warning> <Security> <BEA-090482> <BAD_CERTIFICATE alert was received from PortalQA - 10.12.10.94. Check the peer to determine why it rejected the certificate chain (trusted CA configuration, hostname verification). SSL debug tracing may be required to determine the exact reason the certificate was rejected.>
And in Admin Server logs it's saying;
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Warning> <Security> <BEA-090504> <Certificate chain received from PortalQA - 10.12.10.94 failed hostname verification check. Certificate contained AdminQA but check expected PortalQA>
The WebLogic Server did not start up properly.
Exception raised: 'weblogic.management.configuration.ConfigurationException: Due to faulty SSL configuration, this server is unable to establish a connection to the node manager.'
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Warning> <NodeManager> <BEA-300038> <The node manager is unable to monitor this server. Could not create an SSL connection to the node manager. Reason : [Security:090504]Certificate chain received from PortalQA - 10.12.10.94 failed hostname verification check. Certificate contained AdminQA but check expected PortalQA>
Reason: weblogic.management.configuration.ConfigurationException: Due to faulty SSL configuration, this server is unable to establish a connection to the node manager.
<Jun 2, 2004 9:44:26 AM GMT 04:00> <Emergency> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000342> <Unable to initialize the server: weblogic.management.configuration.ConfigurationException: Due to faulty SSL configuration, this server is unable to establish a connection to the node manager.>
If some one can help me, I do appreciate in all due respect.
Sameer.

Hello,
NodeManager requires proper SSL configuration. Are you sure you are using the right certificates?
Try running AS with following option
-Dweblogic.security.SSL.ignoreHostnameVerification=true
Ali

MCX Managed printers problem with Adobe CS5.5

I manage 300 or so Macs running 10.6x with a 10.6 server using Workgroup Manager.
I am having a problem where the managed printers multiply exponentially in Adobe applications, so that on some machines there may be 15 or so versions of the same printer in the print dialogue box. This only happens in Adobe Applications. When I look in CUPS there are multiple MCX versions of the same printer, no other Applications seem to be picking up these extra printers. If I reset the print system and reboot then everything returns to normal for a while, but the extra printers slowly return. Is anybody else having the same problem and managed to solve it?

Did you ever resolve this? I'm also having issues!

Benefits Management Enrollment problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for