Best Strategy for importing a WAR file

I would like to import a WAR file into JDeveloper and run it against the embedded OC4J app server. What is the best strategy (the approach which minimizes the amount of cutting and pasting)??
I tried to use the File/Import menu selection, but that didn't seem to operate the way that I expected. I also tried using the "Existing Source" from the same menu selection with "index.jsp", but JDeveloper didn't seem to like that either (it complained that it couldn't read "index.jsp" from within a zip file. So I had to resort to "New/Web Tier/JSP Page" and then cutting and pasting the source. After that JDeveloper was happy (no "not under the root server directory" errors). But I would like to have a more streamlined approach, because these WAR file has hundreds of files.
Thanks, Norman

Did you try creating
"Project from an Existing WAR file" option.
Create an emtpy workspace
File | New
Select General
Select Projects
Select "Project from an Existing WAR file" option
raghu
JDev Team

Similar Messages

Best strategy for importing organized images

Hello,
I have recently started using Aperture in my photography workflow and I need some advice from the experts on the best strategy to import the existing .JPGs from my hard disk into my Aperture library.
Prior to using Aperture, my workflow was as follows:
1.) I would import ALL the photos from my digital camera to a folder on my hard disk (one folder for each date of import). These, in effect, were my 'master' images, which I never edited or deleted.
2.) Next I would make a copy of each new master folder, under a separate folder called 'picks', where I would go thru and delete the bad ones and occasionally make some minor edits or crops to the good ones. These 'picks' folders are what I used for my slideshows, photo galleries, etc.
NOW, as I'm moving everything to Aperture, I'm attempting to find the best strategy to import everything, where I would maintain both a master copy of everything that came off my camera and the already organized 'albums' of 'versions' the represent my 'picks', but also reduce some of the redundancy of having duplicate copies of 60-70% of the photos in my library.
Here is where I need some advice. In the case of new photos imported directly from the camera into Aperture I have managed to figure out how to import the master images and then create albums of versions for my good pics. However, I haven't found any way to import my existing masters and picks without importing two copies of each "good" pick.
Is there any way I can get Aperture to recognize that the photos in my 'picks' folders are actually 'versions' of some of the original 'masters' so I don't need to import two master copies of each of my good pics? (I generally left the file names the same.)
I have several thousand existing pics on my hard disk that I'm hoping to import into Aperture so I'm hoping there is an efficient way to do this!
Many thanks for the help!

HI I would also be interested in how others do this. I have been playing with aperture for some time and I am still not sure whether to commit to it.
I also keep my masters in a folder structure with year at the highest level and day of shooting below that.
I know its not necessary to do this in Aperture but I am not sure I understand why or if its a bad thing to do.
Would love to her what others think and advise.
Thanks

Best camera for importing HD video files native to FCP?

I am researching what type of HD video camera to buy. The goal is to have video material captured to a memory card or stick and have the resultant video files available for direct import into FCP. I have used rented cameras in the past where I had to go through a convoluted process of importing the video material into iMovie, and then exporting the material from that application, so that the video files were usable by FCP.
Any info on how to judge whether a camera will create files that can be imported directly would be very helpful. I have read, for example, that if the camera creates AVCHD files, you can't edit natively in FCP. I am looking for a camera that is relatively portable, and has image quality one notch below pro standards (to keep cost under $1,500 I hope.) Thank you in advance.

Hi again, Guys.
In this discussion, the consensus was that the Panasonic HMC-40 was a good choice at a modest price for shooting HD material that would be cut on FCP 7. Sadly, I neglected to say, when I started the discussion, that ideally I need to shoot both in the US and the UK. i.e. at 60 Hz and at 50 Hz respectively. When I researched the Panasonic HMC-40 I was told that it could not switch between 60 and 50 Hz. But that the next camera up COULD switch. That camera is the AG HMC 151 E. I was told this by a Panasonic rep in the UK. But the problem is that I would like to puchase the camera in the US. The US model is the AG HMC 150. And that model it seems DOESN'T switch between 60 and 50 Hz. It only shoots 60. (Why Panasonic has done this is a mystery to me.)
On a tech discussion group about HD shooting, one person said that the problem with shooting 60 Hz in the UK is mainly lighting, e.g. if you are shooting with florescent light in the UK, you might get flicker if you use a 60Hz camera in the UK. So my questions are:
1) If I am shooting in the UK with a 60 Hz camera (i.e. a camera I have purchsed in the US that is not switchable) what are the biggest problems?
Is it only if I were shooting in florescent light, or is the quality overall a big problem.
2) If I shoot 60 Hz but am shooting in the UK, can I use FCP to convert the 60 Hz materail to 50 Hz and will that solve any image problems?
3) Now that I have mentioned that I would like to be able to shoot in the UK and US with the same camera, but that I want to buy the camera in the US, does anyone have another recommendation of a camera that is in the $2,000. range that would serve this purpose and still create files that would work well in FCP 7?
Do Sony or Canon address this switchable 60/50 Hz issue more effectively than Panasonic? In the earlier discussion, it was noted that Panasonic cameras created files that were easiest to use with FCP.
I am sure I have said things here that reveal how unknowledgeable I am about shooting HD. But this will be my first camera purchase after having been an editor for over 10 years. Any advice most welcome, and thanks in advance.

Question: Best Strategy for Dealing with Large Files 1GB

Hi Everyone,
I have to build a UCM system for large files > 1GB.
What will be the best way to upload them (applet, checkin form, webdav)?
Also what will be the best way to download them (applet, web form, webdav)?
Any tips will be greatly appreciated
Tal.

Not sure what the official best practice is, but I prefer to get the file on the servers file system first (file copy) and check it in from that path. This would require a customization / calling a custom service.
Boris
Edited by: user8760096 on Sep 3, 2009 4:01 AM

Best format for importing AVCHD (.mts) files?

After reading a lot of these archives and being a very new Mac user, I think I understand what I have to do here. I have an HD camcorder that records in .mts. I can either directly import from the camera to iMovie (which takes up far too much space) or I can convert the .mts to a different format that takes up lesser space while keeping the original files saved elsewhere.
What I haven't been able to figure out is, what format is going to be the most space efficient? While I would love to have super great HD quality, these are all home movies and primarily I want to be able to view them, edit/merge clips a little for storage, possibly burn to a DVD. Some quality lost in compression is ok with me. I have handbrake and converted to .mp4, but that still seemed to take up a lot of room...about 450 MB for maybe a 1-2 minute clip. There has got to be a better way, I would imagine, that would store better and also be acceptable to iMovie without translating into AIC codec (which I know takes a lot of room). Any thoughts? I am open to other third party conversion tools. I also can use Final Cut Pro if there is a compressed file FCP uses that will be smaller and better.
Thanks!!

So, I've been playing around with things. I used handbrake to convert the .m2ts into .m4v, and when I unclicked "optimize file", the file stayed at around 32 MB, and the original .m2ts was 27 MB. I also used a VoltaicHD trial to convert (it converted to .mov), and it was 107MB. The quality in iMovie was not too different to my eye, and it looks like the different is 1920x1080 vs 1440x816.
For home movie quality type stuff (and provided I keep original files in the event I ever want to use them), is the handbrake method going to be the smallest I can get? It seems pretty good to me, an extra few MB isn't a big deal...just not sure if I'm totally missing something here. It seems like the .m4v isn't being converted to the AIC, whereas the .mov is. Handbrake is a pain b/c it doesn't seem like I can click on multiple files at once to add to queue, but to save all that space it seems worth it. Tried MPEG streamclip and it doesn't convert .m2ts. Just want to make sure I'm not missing something, because that's a huge difference in storage space.

What's best strategy for dealing with 40+ hours of footage

We have been editing a documentary with 45+ hours of footage and presently have captured roughly 230 gb. Needless to say it's a lot of files. What's the best strategy for dealing with so much captured footage? It's almost impossible to remember it all and labeling it while logging it seems inadequate as it difficult to actually read comments in dozens and dozens of folders.
Just looking for suggestions on how to deal with this problem for this and future projects.
G5 Dual Core 2.3 Mac OS X (10.4.6) 2.5 g ram, 2 internal sata 2 250gb

Ditto, ditto, ditto on all of the previous posts. I've done four long form documentaries.
First I listen to all the the sound bytes and digitize only the ones that I think I will need. I will take in much more than I use, but I like to transcribe bytes from the non-linear timeline. It's easier for me.
I had so many interviews in the last doc that I gave each interviewee a bin. You must decide how you want to organize the sound bytes. Do you want a bin for each interviewee or do you want to do it by subject. That will depend on you documentary and subject matter.
I then have b-roll bins. Sometime I base them on location and sometimes I base them on subject matter. This last time I based them on location because I would have a good idea of what was in each bin by remembering where and when it was shot.
Perhaps, you weren't at the shoot and do not have this advantage. It's crucial that you organize you b-roll bins in a way that makes sense to you.
I then have music bins and bins for my voice over.
Many folks recommend that you work in small sequences and nest. This is a good idea for long form stuff. That way you don't get lost in the timeline.
I also make a "used" bin. Once I've used a shot I pull it out of the bin and put it "away" That keeps me from repeatedly looking at footage that I've already used.
The previous posts are right. If you've digitized 45 hours of footage you've put in too much. It's time to start deleting some media. Remember that when you hit the edit suite, you should be one the downhill slide. You should have a script and a clear idea of where you're going.
I don't have enough fingers to count the number of times that I've had producers walk into my edit suite with a bunch of raw tape and tell me that that "want to make something cool." They generally have no idea where they're going and end up wondering why the process is so hard.
Refine your story and base your clip selections on that story.
Good luck
Dual 2 GHz Power Mac G5 Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Best methods for importing artwork via Illustrator with tranparency?

I'm new to Final Cut Pro and am tryin to figure out the best methods for importing artwork via Illustrator. So far, I've been saving the artwork as a transparent PNG, but I feel like there should be a better way. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Hi:
Ussually I have to rebuild in AI the company logo (I use to work for industries) to include in FCP edit.
- If you have CS2, open Photoshop and create a new file using the right preset (i.e. DV PAL) using transparent background. That creates a PSD empty file with all attributes you need (pixels dimensions and aspect ratio) to use later in FCP.
- Select your work (i.e. the final logo) in the AI canvas and copy it.
- Paste it in the empty PSD file as "vextor information" (I don't remember right now the exact words!). That way you can resize it in the PSD file without loosing quality.
- The better ir deciding the size NOW in Photoshop, or create sveral version in different sizes. Yuo'll get better quality id you make the resizings in Photoshop rather that doing a scale in FCP timeline.
- Once your logo is in the right dimension into the PSD file, save a copy and flatten all layers keeping the transparent background. If you don't need the layers during editing in FCP, you better have all layers flattened.
- Import that file in FCP.
That's my workflow, but probably you'll find different flavors here!
Alberto

Best strategy for ID based video source with a plugin

Hi,
What would be the best strategy to load a video file based on an ID instead of source URL. The plugin would use a webservice to lookup the ID and retrieve the url for the video. The ID would be passed to the player via a flashvar.
Thanks,
Peter

Hello!
I guess LoadFromDocumentElement would be optimal...
SMIL plugin is based upon it - so you may want to refer to it.

Importing a WAR file into WebLogic 8.1

Hello,
First post here so go easy on me :-D
Is it possible to import a WAR file into WebLogic 8.1? If so, how?
I have a WAR file created using Eclipse and want to test if I can take that WAR file and rebuild the project in WebLogic.
Any help is appreciated?
Thanks,
Tommy

I,
your domain should be started in developement mode. Then, just copy your
war file in the "applications" directory under your domain directory.
Emmanuel
Tommy Dunne a ?crit :
Thanks Emmanuel, I had a look at that link you sent me.
Im still isnt 100% clear to me...In tomcat when you have a WAR file you can just put it in the webapps directory and tomcat will automatically expand it for you and you can run the application straight away.
Is there such functionality in weblogic? How do you get weblogic to see the WAR file? Do you have to create a project or anything?
Sorry if this is a very basic question...

Best setup for a non-Mac file server?

I have a dual xeon server, with a SATA RAID5 I want to use as a file server in a cross-platform environment.
*What I've tried and the issues...*
At first I considered using Windows 2003 (Win2k3) but Services for Macintosh (SFM) is an older version of AFP and thus only supports 31 character filenames. With all our Macs supporting SMB/Samba/CIFS and Apple touting that "Macs and PCs can co-exist harmoniously on the same network" I figured I would give that a try.
SMB doesn't work.
Sure I can create a connection, but transferring files is a completely different story. I'm trying to backup application and system data, but companies such as Adobe and Apple have named some of their files with special characters that can't be transferred over SMB. I know NTFS doesn't support these characters, but I though a Linux box using SMB would work fine. It doesn't. It's the protocol which keeps me from transferring the data. I end up with the lovely error message of "You cannot copy some of these items to the destination because their names are too long or contain invalid characters for the destination..." (what's sad is, if you google for " because their names are too long or contain invalid characters for the destination" you only get 6 results.)
So I thought I would give NFS a try. Apple says "Viewed from Mac OS X, [connecting via NFS] is just like connecting to an Apple or Windows server." No. It's not. NFS shares don't even show up in the Finder's Network listing. There are also a pile of other hurdles which are only tackled by savvy, command-line using users.
So that leaves me with AFP. Win2k3 doesn't support filenames longer than 31 characters, and Win2k8 is dropping SFM altogether. Off to choose a *nix flavor, but that requires Netatalk. It hasn't been updated in years, it has many bad performance reviews... and most distros have removed it. I can download and install it. Oh, but that requires I get the kernel source files. Then I have to create an RPM an that's not working... now I'm several levels deep in trying to figure out how to get Netatalk working and I'm not even sure it will work.
*What's the best setup for a non-Mac file server?*
FreeNAS seems promising, but it's in alpha/beta and they have all sorts of warnings regarding potential data loss. Sure there's ExtremeZ-IP, but I really don't want to spend $675 do something Apple claims OS X can already do. I can put just about any non-Mac OS on this thing... what's the best way to set it up so it works?
Thanks much.

Rick may be right because although i didnt think of it before i tend to have notoriuosly long classnames for my php classes and i have used samba on occasion (when rsync is out of the question for one reason or another) and never had a problem. I use kubuntu (feisty at the moment )with an ext3 filesystem. if i have a chance this evening ill give it a try and see what happens.
You could also possibly use FUSE to use an ssh filesystem for the shares... i don tknow how that would figure in your back up though.
Also if worse comes to worse you could tar or dmg the the necessary files... just some thoughts.
Ill be interested to know what you end up implementing....
OH one last thought... Compile Darwin from source and use that as your server

Best strategy for variable aggregate custom component in dataTable

Hey group, I've got a question.
I'd like to write a custom component to display a series of editable Things in a datatable, but the structure of each Thing will vary depending on what type of Thing it is. So, some Things will display radio button groups (with each radio button selecting a small set of additional input elements, so we have a vertical array radio buttons and beside each radio button, a small number of additional input elements), some will display text-entry fields, and so on.
I'm wondering what the best strategy for tackling this sort of thing is. I'm sort of thinking I'll need to do something like dynamically add to the component tree in my custom component's encodeBegin(), and purge the extra (sub-) components in encodeEnd().
Decoding will be a bit of a challenge, maybe.
Or do I simply instantiate (via constructor calls, not createComponent()) the components I want and explicitly call their encode*() and decode() methods, without adding them to the view tree?
To add to the fun of all this, I'm only just learning Faces (having gone through the Dudney book, Mastering JSF, and writing some simpler custom components) and I don't have experience with anything other than plain vanilla JSP. (No EJB, no Struts, no Tapestry, no spiffy VisualDevStudioWysiwyg++ [bah humbug, I'm an emacs user]). I'm using JSP 2.0, JSF 1.1_01, JBoss 4.0.1 and JDK 1.4.2. No, I won't upgrade to 1.5 (yet).
Any hints, pointers to good sample code? I've looked at some of the sample code that came with the RI and I've tried to navigate the JSF Blueprints stuff, but I haven't really found anything on aggregating components into a custom component. Did I miss something obvious?
If this isn't a good question, please let me know how I can sharpen it up a bit.
Thanks.
John.

Hi,
We're doing something very similar. I had a look at the Tomahawk Date component, and it seems to dynamically created InputText components in the encodeEnd(). However, it doesn't decode this directly (it only expects a single textual value). I expect you may have to check the request yourself in decode().
Other ideas would be appreciated, though - I'm still new to JSF.

Best strategy for migrating GL 6 DW CS4?

First I gotta say that -- as decade-long user of several Adobe products -- Adobe has really screwed over long-time users of Adobe Golive. After a week of messing around with something that should be a slam dunk (considering the substatial amount of $ I've paid to Adobe over the years for multiple copies of GoLive 5, 6 and CS2), I can tell you Adobe's GL > DW migration utility ONLY works for sites created FROM SCRATCH in GL CS2 (they must have the web-content, web-data folder structure). This means that Adobe's migration utility only works for maybe 10% - 15% of the GoLive sites out there, and about 10% - 15% of Adobe's loyal GoLive customers, and it particularly screws over Adobe's longtime GoLive customers. Sweet! ( (Just like Adobe screwed over users of PhotoStyler -- which was a better image editor than PhotoShop, BTW.) Obviously, I would walk away from Adobe and make sure I never ever paid them another cent, but the Republican-Democrat "free market economy" has made sure I don't have that option.
So I've gotta make Dreamweaver work, which means I've gotta migrate several large sites (the biggest has 5,000 static pages and is about 2 gigs in size) from GoLive 6 (or GoLive CS2 with the older folder structure) to Dreamweaver CS4.
Which brings me to my question -- what's the best strategy for doing ths? Adobe's migration utility is a bad joke, so here's the alternative, real world plan I've come up with. I'd apreciate any suggestions or comments...
1) create copies of all my GL components in the content folders for my GL site (not in the GoLIve components folder)
2) replace the content of all GoLive compnents (in the GoLive components folder) with unque character strings, so that instead of a header with images and text, my old header would look something like xxxyyyzzz9
3) create a new folder called astoni in the root of my hard drive. Copy all my GoLIve web site content (HTML, images, SWF, etc.) into astoni in exactly the structure it was in with GL
4) create a new Dreamweaver site by defining astoni as the local location for my site, astoni\images as the location for images, etc.
5) use Dreamweaver and open the newly defined astoni site. Then open each of the GoLive components I copied into a content level folder in astoni, and drag each into the Dreamweaver Assets/Library pane, in order to create library items just like my old GoLive components
6) use Dreamweaver to Search & Replace out the unique text strings like xxxyyyzzz9 with the content of my new DW library items
7) refresh site view to make all the links hook up...
Thanks for your help. Hope this discussion helps others too...

Instead of ragging on people who are familiar with DW and Site Development, you should be gracious and accept the practical advice you've been given. A "best strategy" would be to read some tutorials and learn how to work with HTML, CSS and server-side technologies. Without some basic code skills, you're going to find DW an uphill, if not impossible battle.
Frankly, I don't have free time to hand-hold someone through the excruciating process of migrating a 5,000 page static site from GoLive to DW. And I doubt anyone else in this forum has either. We're not Adobe employees. We don't get paid to participate here. We are all product users JUST LIKE YOU.
I'm sorry you're frustrated. I'm also sorry for your clients. But the problem you have now isn't Adobe's fault. It's yours for not keeping up with server-side technologies or handing-off these huge static sites to more capable web developers. I'm not saying you need to buy anyone's books, but they are good resources for people willing to learn new things.
That said, maybe you should stick with GoLive. The software doesn't have an expiration date on it and will continue working long into the future. If you're happy using GL, keep using it to maintain your legacy sites. At the same time learn X/HTML, CSS & PHP or ASP. Use DW CS4 for the creation of new projects.
FREE Tutorial Links:
HTML & CSS Tutorials - http://w3schools.com/
From Tables to CSS Web Design Part 1 -
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/table_to_css_pt1.html
From Tables to CSS Web Design Part 2 -
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/table_to_css_pt2.html
Taking a Fireworks (or Photoshop) comp to a CSS based layout in DW
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/fireworks/articles/web_standards_layouts_pt1.html
Creating your first website in DW CS4 -
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/first_cs4_website_pt1.html
Guidance on when to use DW Templates, Library Items and SSIs -
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/ssi_lbi_template.html
Best of luck,
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
www.alt-web.com/
www.twitter.com/altweb
www.alt-web.blogspot.com

Best Method For Importing Clips Between FCP Projects

What is the best method for importing clips between FCP 7.0.3 projects? I am wondering whether or not pulling the clips from the Capture Scratch folder is the way to go or will using Import from the new FCP project create a new folder in Capture Scratch with the imported clips? I have a new HD camcorder with different clips for different projects and Log and Transfer makes it so easy to bring them all in at once but now wondering how best to separate them into separate Capture Scratch folders for each project.

well, I simply either drag them in to the new/different project from the finder, or drag or copy and paste between open fcp projects. Never had any problems working this way. Just remember that if you delete a specific project scratch disk folder, you may be deleting media used in another project.

Best method for importing mini DV tape movies directly to an external seagate hard drive for later import to iMovies ??

Best method for importing mini DV tape movies directly to an Seagate external hard drive,for later import to imovie event???

The simplest and cheapest option is LifeFlix. They have more info at www.lifeflix.com or on the Mac app store at https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/lifeflix/id630212114?ls=1&mt=12

Best strategy for buring dual layer DVD

I've got a project that won't fit on a single layer DVD, so I've got it set up for dual layer and "best quality" which results in a 7.38GB disk image. However, iDVD 8 warned me when burning the disk images that some utilities may not be able to burn a reliable dual layer disk copy and to use iDVD instead, does this include Disk Utility?
I always use Disk Utility to make copies, iDVD took almost 7 hours to burn the disk image, I can't afford to wait that long for each copy. So what's the best strategy for burning dual layer DVDs?

subsequent copies burn in far less time immediately after the first provide you don't quit iDvd
If you know ahead of time you'll need more than a few copies, I'd recommend burning from a disc image to the desktop and reducing the burn speed (4x or lower) I prefer to use Roxio Toast myself. But others have had success with Apple's Disc Utilities as well.

Best Strategy for importing a WAR file

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for