Better zoom method for viewing image

Why can't they have the same type system as in Elements or full ps? Control + or - to change size and smaller jumps in size. And keep the same style slider thingy in both develop and library modules.
And of course ability to separate panels on another monitor. Image size is EVERYTHING when you're trying to make adjustments.

Ctrl + and = (which has - on it also) zoom in and out through the 4 zoom levels visible in the Navigator. If you require the final zoom to be larger than the default 2:1, then select it from the dropdown and LR remembers this for the final zoom..
As to the difference between Quick Develop and Develop, Quick Develop does RELATIVE adjustments, which are there for quick settings. It's useful for brightening images which have different exposure settings for example, where doing the same in Develop would force them all to the same ABSOLUTE value. The idea is to use it to help get to the Pick files quickly before Developing these files. There's no sense in developing 1000 files when you ultimately will only bring 10-20 top quality ones out at the end.
As to image size, Try Tab and Shift TAB.

Similar Messages

Default Program for Viewing Images?

I want to download and try the Photoshop Album Starter Edition while updating my Adobe Reader. BUT, if I don't like it I want to be able to return to using my Windows Photo Gallery. Does the Photoshop Starter Edition automatically set itself as the DEFAULT program for viewing pictures, etc? If so, how do I reset it to my Windows Photo Gallery or other program? Thanks!

Hi Alan,
To set some program other than Photoshop Album Starter Edition as your default program for viewing images of a particular format, say .jpeg, right click on any .jpeg image and then select "Open with" and then "Choose Program. In the open with dialog box select the application that you want to use for viewing .jpeg images and check the check box at the bottom of the dialog box which says "Always use the selected program to open this kind of file.
Cheers,
Chhaya

Looking for a Hi Res solution for viewing images and for capturing video

We are looking to complete some training videos that utilize a microscope, a Sony Firewire camera (1/3-inch Progressive Scan Color CCD 1024x768 Pixel Array). I want to capture the video on a macbook (imovie or FCE) and be able to make some training DVDs.
In addition, I need to purchase a monitor (cinema display??) that would allow people to view the manipulation from the microscope.
Whay type of setup am I looking at ? Will the Apple Cinema display work for this and give a hi res image on it?
I am not familar with the displays or the desired setup (the video out on the macbook be acceptable as the video comes in from the camera or does the camera go directly to the monitor?
ny insight would be appreciative. Thank you

Hi jforsberg,
What we need to know is that microscope have a video out or practically you use the Sony to capture the video thru microscope using custom tripod or camera holder?
If using you Sony is the case, then you can use iMovie for that, and you can view it "live" while you capture (import) it by selecting the input menu to your sony like shown here by EZJIM:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1091996&tstart=25
And you can mirror the screen from macbook to bigger external screen using mini DVI adapter. There are three option mini dvi to vga, mini dvi to dvi, and mini dvi to video, and if you want to use apple cinema display I believe you have to buy the mini dvi to dvi.
And apple said that macbook can drive up to 23" cinema display with 1440 x 900 resolution, but other user on macbook forum reportedly can use with other bigger screen and bigger resolution as well.
Best way is you visit apple store and buy that adapter and have it tested with both 23" and 30" (I believe apple guy won't mind considering you are a potential cinema display buyer).
Good Luck.

Changing rate of zoom motion for still image?

Hey everyone,
I'm working on a short documentary and have a large still image I am zooming out of with the motion tab, setting 2 key frames for zoom and center point at beginning and end.
The rate of the zoom goes slow at first and then speeds up more and more as it goes along, and it's going so fast by the end that you can't see the whole image. So I'm wondering how I can give it an even rate of zoom out, or at least slowing it down at the end.
I tried adding another zoom key frame, but couldn't find where the center point key frame was supposed to be, so it wound up changing it's directory a bit at that point.
There's got to be a way to do this. Thanks again!

Yeah, FC doesn't handle this real well. Using the Ease in sometimes works, but I've found that instead of easing in, it sort of adjusts (subtly) the position of the photo.
What I've done in the past is adjust the speed of the photo "clip" to run longer, so the zoom is slower.
I've also thought the original file size of the photo made a difference, a larger file seems to not have this problem as bad, though I have NOT tested this. For me, this seemed to happen when using smaller files. My PS files are around 30MB each! Yes, lots of rendering when doing anything to them, but that does work.
Jonathan

Problem for viewing Image and "\n" on Alert

Good day.
I made a Midlet MIDP 1.0 CLDC 1.0 that have an Image on Alert class;
this is my code:
Alert al = new Alert("AppTitle");
try {
al.setImage(Image.createImage("/MyApp/myimg.jpg"));
} catch (java.io.IOException e) {
al.setTimeout(3000);
al.setType(AlertType.INFO);
display.setCurrent(al);
On Nokia Phones (I've tried Series 40 e 60) the result is that I view on text area Information and near of it (but cutted) the image.
Why?
I have another question:
If I use on Alert class
al.setString("MyApp\nMyName");
within or eithout image On Nokia phones the "\n" idn't considered.
Both problems in others phones (I've tried Motorola and Sony-Ericsson) aren't.
Why?
Best regards and good work.
Stefano Errani

Hi MTSTUNER & J Maloney
I really appreciate the interest you've both taken in the question.
Yes, J Maloney you would be correct. I was wanting to see the whole of the image, the masked bits and the not masked bits... as well as the mask too all simultaneously.
I'm currently kicking myself that I've not explored the Masks panel. Don't know when it was introduced, I have kind of skipped a version of PhotoShop or two on my own machine - lame excuse, I know gov. The density idea is far more elegant than my solution. However, I did find that by creating the duplicate I've been able to colourise it so as to make the results of what I was doing really obvious visually. I like the invert idea too, so simple - and it might prove the best of the options... but I'll try it on another image as I've pretty much done this one - lots of hats, not much hair.
No offence on the "last paragraph". My reaction was "it's not unasked" though I wasn't clear: "How do sensible people approach this exercise?"
Thank you too MSTUNER, I appreciate the time spent.
"Quick Mask?" occurred randomly to me. Something I've never bothered with, tending to go straight to Layer Mask work. I'll own up that Quick Mask has never managed to make itself part of my workflow, I've no idea why because I'm sure it should if I gave it time. However, a quick experiment hasn't produced a Eureka moment. I was hoping I could easily subtract or add a Quick Mask from/to an existing Layer Mask... nope, doesn't seem to want to - though it was a 'quick' experiment.
Thank you again for taking the time and enjoy the rest of your day. Regards.

Alternative method for displaying images blobs stored in DB

I am trying to use an Application Process as a means to displaying images stored in BLOB columns in my table. And it works except for one problem. The code for my on-demand Application Process is below (the name of the application process is OUTPUT_IMAGE):
DECLARE
l_mime VARCHAR2(255);
l_length NUMBER;
l_file_name VARCHAR2(2000);
lob_loc BLOB;
BEGIN
SELECT photo_mime_type,
photo_blob,
photo_filename,
dbms_lob.getlength(photo_blob)
INTO l_mime,
lob_loc,
l_file_name,
l_length
FROM persons
WHERE id = 260;
owa_util.mime_header(nvl(l_mime,'application/octet'), FALSE);
htp.p('Content-length: ' || l_length);
htp.p('Content-Disposition: filename="' || l_file_name || '"');
owa_util.http_header_close;
wpg_docload.download_file(lob_loc);
END;
I can then create HTML like:
<img src="f?p=[my_app_id]:0:[the_session_id]:APPLICATION_PROCESS=OUTPUT_IMAGE">
Which works nicely.
The question/problem is: How can I pass the ID of the record (whose BLOB I want to display) to the Application Process? (In the code above you'll see the value of 260 is currently hard coded). I thought about tacking on something like "&my_id=xxx' to the end of the URL but doing so prevents the Application Process from even running. 
All comments/suggestions much appreciated, 
Thanks,
 
Andy

Andrew,
The URL for an Application Process uses the standard f?p syntax.
Try passing your value like this:
< img src="f?p=[my_app_id]:0:[the_session_id]:APPLICATION_PROCESS=OUTPUT_IMAGE:NO::MY_ID:[the value to send]"> You would need to have an item called MY_ID.
Your query could then refer to it as
WHERE id = :MY_ID;
Doug

Any lifecycle methods for view/page that can be triggered during Navigation ?

Hi ,
Say i have 2 views. I navigate from 1st view to 2nd View using App.to method. Now is there any lifecycle method that i can trigger in the view/page once the app navigates to 2nd view ?
Regards
Sakthi

Hi.
U mean go back to 1st view?
Regards
Pavan

What is the proper method for embedding image files in a documentDB model?

I'm working on some standard CMS functionality to produce simple service articles for a website. I'm looking at two possible options but I'm not sure which way to go.
Example 1:
I really want to create a value object to represent the image such as
class ImageFile
public byte[] fileData { get; set;}
public string contentType { get; set;}
class WebArticle
public ImageFile {get; set}
public string someContent { get; set; }
Or am I stuck with storing the image seperately w/ Azure Storage and just simply using my documentDB object to reference it's url via something like this:
class WebArticle
public string imageUrl { get; set; }
public string someContent { get; set; }
I see that there is some way to add "Attachments" but I'm not really clear on what the attachments are for. I don't think that I am reading the correct documentation. Is there a webpage out there that clarifies this. A kindle book on Amazon maybe?
I'm looking forward to using this new technology. Ryan's Channel 9 presentation on the subject really caught my attention.
Thank,
Dan Jerome

Ryan C:
https://code.msdn.microsoft.com/Azure-DocumentDB-NET-Code-6b3da8af
Mimi G:
http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/documentdb-resources/

Method for "darkening" images

Hi,
I am floundering about looking for a quick and easy way of moving the RGB values of all the pixels of an image x% towards a solid colour. Does anyone know of anything that will do this or similar?
Cheers.

look for the RGBImageFilter class

Missing plugin quicklook for view image in finder

How to solve my problem?

I think you have to give us more information like which system version you have, why you think you don't have the quick look, what you have tried to resolve the problem.

How to view image by using webcam at other computer.

I am student. Now I make one project by using LabVIEW software.
Now, my question is:
I have two computer, both computer got install software LabVIEW. And the programming for viewing image by using webcam already finished done.
Now is, I want to open Webcam at computer B from Computer A. I already search, found that techique "Web Publishing Tools" can do this. Beside this, got another easier technique to do this?

There are other ways in which you can transfer images over the network but you will need to do some programming for it. Have a look at the following links:
Streaming IMAQ Images Over a Network (or Internet)
Transfer Images Over the Network
Adnan Zafar
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Coleman Technologies

Need image viewer zoom software for N900

Hi all, I need a picture viewer with zoom feature for N900, where can I find a free app? Thx.

well, the built-in picture viewer of your N900 has also a zoom feature. what exactly are you missing?

Is there any options/addons for selecting/changing image size when viewing images?

When clicking to open images when on web pages there is no option to select size.
I'm looking at some pages that have images (mostly jpg) I like to compare and that is very hard when all images open in a size that normally fill most of the browser window.
So I wonder if there is some hidden options or addons for selecting image size when opening images for viewing?
I have tried Image resizer/scaler, image zoom and show picture with mix results. Image resizer/scaler and image zoom allow resizing of images, but when opening images on same tab as web page the white image "frame" that is visible when reducing image size is left in original size. This make viewing and opening other pages a hazard.
I'm grateful for any help...cheers :-)
Picture of white frame
http://s25.postimg.org/z1ubo6zun/Remove_Exterior_Fog_at_Skyrim_Nexus_mods_and_c.png

hehe no offense, but I'm not following the version rushing from Mozilla. I'm using many customizations and addons and it is a nightmare to change to a new version and practically impossible to use last version. Also the FIrefox history have shown that earlier versions have both been more stable and had better implementation of features.
Spending hours customizing and finding out that addons dont work with new version every time Firefox come with a new version , no thanks. For that to happen Firefox have to be more compatible across versions and more friendly toward customization in updates and new versions. I have used Firefox for at least 8-9 years with practically no security problems and one thing I have learned is: dont update or install next version if the version I have is working well.
Maybe I should have mentioned this in this question, that Im using v26 and that my FIrefox is heavily modified with addons and customizations.
'''Back to the subject'''
Anyway I dont think any of my customizations or addons should create a white frame behind images, but I'm asking to find out if you guys also get this white frame when resizing pictures to a smaller size after clicking images for viewing.

Which app is the best for viewing documents without sliding while zooming?

I have many novels saved under *.htm, doc and pdf.
I'm using Quick Office, but when I zoom in, I have to slide the screen from side to side just to watch the whole things, which make my eyes feel very tired.
So I need your help about which app is the best for viewing documents without sliding while zooming, I mean, when you zoom in, you just have to slide vertically to see the whole documents, and don't have to slide horizontally.

shazeal wrote:
There is a big difference between Windows and Linux, the scheduler being the biggest. Here are 3 shots from oblivion, I tried to keep the Tri-passes around 400-450k, and the texture mem is ~ the same in all 3.
The first two also have, Apache, Dovecott, Mysql, Samba, and SSHD running in the back ground, these were all stopped for the 3rd.
Gnome Desktop 2.2.4 Full bloated install - All background services running, run from gnome terminal, Firefox open. Consonance Music player running.
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/1551 … tc5.th.jpg
Xorg only no WM, with urxvt console open to launch the game, nothing else running except background services.
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/34/s … zu1.th.jpg
Xorg only, all non essential services stopped.
http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/7540 … zd7.th.jpg
All running on Wine 1.1.7, Oblivion is running around 150 mods, and QTP3, Body mods, High res texture packs for the character skins, with HDR lighting. As you can see the FPS does not change, it fluctuated between 19-20 on all three runs.
Especially with Dual cores, you will find that games do not loose FPS even with things like a lightweight music player running in the background. Windows scheduler simply was not made for that kind of thing, and benifits alot more from a lower number of background processes. I wont say linux does not benifit, but with Dual cores and CFS, it is not really noticable anymore.
Wait, does that mean you have better performance while you are running more stuff? Does the desktop manager handle graphics better?
This really did confuse me...

Which is better datatype for storing Images in 11gr2 Database ?

Can anyone tell me which datatype should be maintained for storing images in database in terms of
1. Space
2. Speed.
And, Is there another way for storing images instead of database ?
Thanks/Regards in advacne.

982164 wrote:
Which one have better speed, database system or file system ?Database is better all around. It is not just a question of speed. It is a question of storage, security, flexibility, scalability, robustness and so on.
If you use ASM and raw devices from a storage array or SAN, how do you get o/s files onto that? (requires a file system on the SAN/array LUNs)
If it is inside the database, database security, concurrency and consistency apply to the image. Outside the database? How do you control who has access? Prevent someone with slippery fingers from accidentally deleting/renaming/moving images files? How do you backup up the image data with the image attribute data in the database?
Having all this inside the database, part of the database, managed by the database, provides you with more flexibility, robustness, and security. After all a RDBMS is a data management system - it is designed for managing data. And that includes managing binary data.
As for speed. Reading a 24MB image is reading 24MB worth of data. Whether that data is read by process A from disk1, or process B from disk2 - the amount of data is the same. So if you want faster I/O, then use faster disks. If disk1 is faster, process A will perform better reading the image than process B. If disk2 is faster, the roles are reversed.
So I/O speed is not a direct function of process A or process B. It is a direct function of the I/O storage and fabric layer. Yes, a process's method of I/O can make a difference (e.g. using block reads not aligned with the physical blocks on disk). But this is more a configuration issue than process doing badly designed I/O calls.
So the speed question is a bit loaded as it has more to do with the architecture and design of the I/O system - and less to do with the process doing that I/O. You can have a highly optimised I/O process doing poorly using an old and slow I/O layer, and poorly written I/O process doing pretty well on a SSD I/O layer.
Databases like Oracle is designed for dealing with data - and thus effectively dealing with I/O. Lots of it. For lots of data. So I/O process design is not a consideration. The database processes will use the I/O layer as optimally as possible and as configured.

Better zoom method for viewing image

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for