BI Analysis Auth Error

Hi Have two analysis auths
1)
0TCAACTVT        02 03
0TCAIPROV          X
0TCAKYFNM       *
0TCAVALID          *
ZOBJ1                    A
ZOBJ2                     B
ZOBJ3                 1
2)
0TCAACTVT        02 03
0TCAIPROV          X
0TCAKYFNM       *
0TCAVALID          *
ZOBJ1                    *
ZOBJ2                     *
ZOBJ3                 2
Both Auths will go together to same user.
I want to restrict access to A and B for  ZOBJ1 & ZOBJ2 for value 1 (ZOBJ3)
but I want to give * access for ZOBJ1 & ZOBJ2 for value 2.
When I assign both auths user get * access for ZOBJ1 & ZOBJ2 for for 1 also.
Is there any way I can limit this access.

Closing so that I can post new quesiton

Similar Messages

  • ':' in SQL Format causes analysis auth failure

    Hi,
    When running a SEM-BPS planning folder it fails due to analysis authorisation errors. On doing a trace it fails as the SQL Format has PLANT = ':' and SALESORG = ':'. These values are not within the analysis auths set-up.
    Talking to the SEM-BPS person here they don't know how those got into the query.
    Any ideas how we can get round this?
    Thanks,
    Nick.

    hello,
    does oracle showing any errors in user_scheduler_job_run_details for this job ? I would advise try inserting some debug statement to identify where exactly its stuck. Also please check sample configurations syntax for user_scheduler_jobs.
    Cheers
    Sush

  • BI Role with Analysis Auth Object

    Hi
    How can i use Authorisation Object created in RECADMIN with all the list of Infoproviders in S_RS_COMP and S_RS_COMP1
    So that user can perform mentioned action on the data providers mentioned in analysis authorization object.
    As i need one place to list all the data targets user can access insted of maintaining in S_RS_COMP and S_RS_COMP1 and in Analysis Authorization object
    Thanks in advance

    Thanks Everybody for giving suggestions; I really appreciate alll your efforts.
    I followed step by step book of kamaljeet and findout that , I was missing to add related info objects of the inforprovider .added those info objects to auth analysis object.
    Now query is working fine without errors;
    problem is i am not able to restict the query since it showing all the data ; i am trying to put only few values in "0wbs_elemt "  .
    I added 0wbs_elemt in my analysis auth object;
    Clicked on 0wbs_elemt and kept values in value authorizations and also kept wbsh in hierarchy name , selected type 1, HI 0.
    still i am unable to restrict the data;
    Functinal consultants build WBSE  set up on a hierarchy. like
    18ICT-07/2011
          18ICT-07/2011-1
                18ICT-07/2011-1-AUDTM
                      18ICT-07/2011-1-AUDTM-01
                18ICT-07/2011-1-CETX_
                      18ICT-07/2011-1-CETX_-01
    they want to restrict like if we are giving 181ct-07 then they want to access every thing under it;
    same way like 181ct-08  etc etc..
    looks like they want to restrict the date very granuler level like  restriction on " Attribute Navigation   "
    Can anybody please do let me know how can we achieve  Navigation Restriction.
    Thanks.

  • Analysis Auth issue - multiple objects

    Currently we have different roles define for each separate section of our business with Comp code and Profit center (along with Hierarchy on PC).
    For e.g.
    Section 1
              Company Code u2013 1010,1050,1500,1520,1700,1800
              Profit Center u2013 150000 u2013 159999 and Profit Center hierarchy u2013 ZPROFIT_CTR_GROUP/99991231/G_15
    Section 2
              Company Code u2013 1110,1150,1500,1520,1700,1800,1980,2050
              Profit Center u2013 190000 u2013 199999 and Profit Center hierarchy u2013 ZPROFIT_CTR_GROUP/99991231/G_19
    Currently there are 30 such roles define, we have quite a segregation within the business. So each BW user generally has one of the 30 roles assign to them. This is working perfectly fine.
    Now because of the consolidations, there are some users who would manage information from different section. So now a user can have access to Section 1 as well as Section 2. Whenever we tried giving access to 2 roles directly to any user, the results of the query comes back as u201CNo Authorizationu201D
    If you notice in the difference between section 1 and 2 is additional company code and some matching company codes along with that is complete different Profit center range and profit center hierarchy node. I am not sure where exactly it is failing.
    Now one more thing for you information is that we have defined Auth variables on Company code (input/Auth/multiple Values) and Profit Center (Input/Authorization/Selection) and Profit Center hierarchy (hierarchy node variable / Authorization)
    I am just trying to understand where the No Auth error msg is coming. Is there some intersection which is killing the query result itself?
    Please let me know if any of you have any suggestion.

    A common problem when authorizing using two different Characteristics is how the authorization variables are filled.
    If a user has access to both section 1 and section 2, a authorization varible for Company Code will contain the values
    1010,1050,1500,1520,1700,1800, 1110,1150,1980,2050
    and the authorization variable for Profit Cetre will contain
    150000 u2013 159999  and 190000 u2013 199999
    If the user doesn't restrict the query further, the system will issue a correct authorization error since the user is not authorized for the selection CC=2050 PC=150000 and all the other "cross-combinations".
    Try creating variants of the selection screen for section 1 and section 2 respectively and force the user to select one of these when executing the query.
    Regards,
    Lars

  • Analysis auth issue

    Hi,
    We have a scenario where we have 2 user IDs:
    X
    Y
    We have a report R1 which has values for an infoobject IO as 1,2,3,4,5
    Now User X is restricted to see only data for values 1,2,3 and Y is restricted for 4,5
    We have created Analysis auth object and assigned it to users. Then we added an auth variable in the report which will restrict data as per user authorization.
    Now the issue is that when we execute the report for User X, only values for 1 is displaying and data for 2 and 3 are not showing up inspite of data being avalable in the underlying Infoprovider.
    Same is the case with User Y where the data is only visible or 4.
    What can be the issue?

    Hi Debanshu,
    Though I could not understand the exact issue, I would rather suggest you to check the authorizations checked while executing the report in Transaction RSECADMIN. In the Transaction goto Analysis tab ->Log Administration. there in the Configure Log recording provide the userid for which you want to test the authorizations And save it.
    When that perticular user runs the report will will be able to see the logs for it using the option "Authorization Logs" screen. And this log will have a detailed information regarding the entire authorization trace for that user for that report.
    Regards,
    Pratap Sone

  • Auth Error in BW while executing a query with Company hierarchy

    Hi All,
    I have an issue in BW Reporting auth objects.. Hope to get resolved here.
    We are using BI 7.0. However We  are still using the Reporting auth objects for fiield level security. We are having a problem while executing a query with company code hierarchy ,which is built on a multiprovider.
    The Background is as below
    Multiprovider: ZM_CD01 with 5 infocubes
    Query: Has 0COMP_CODE as free characteristics with display hierarchy for Japan (Node APSC_012 is fixed value)
    Node APSC_012 has 4070,4076,407A,408A,9830 company code values under it.
    Reporting Auth Objects:
    Z0COMPCODE: (for flat values)
    4070,4076,407A,408A,407M,407P,8236, :
    ZHCOMPCODE: (For tree structure)
    4070,4076,407A,408A,407M,407P,8080, :
    APSC_MGMT_HIER (Nodes: APSC_012,APSC019)
    Both the reporting authorization objects are checked for multi provider ZM_CD01 in RSSM
    While executing the query the following Auth error is received.
    You do not have authorization to read object  "Z0COMPCODE" authorization on '0COMP_CODE'
    When I change the values for Z0COMPCODE to * it works fine. No Auth error.
    Please help me resolve this issue. It is very critical now as the user needs to execute some important reports.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Ramkumar C

    Hi Chandra,
    Try the following:
    1. Go to tcode RSSM
    2. Enter the cube ZM_CD01 (all the other cubes) then click change.
    3. Afterwards, u201Cunchecku201D ALL Authorization Objects under this cube. (Repeate the same for all the cubes)
    4. Click Save.
    This will resolve the issue.
    Rgds,
    Raghu

  • Creation of Analysis Auth from SU21

    Hi All,
    I gave a try to one auth. Just wanted anyone of you to clarify this.
    I created one customised object from SU21, and created the field, which we have used in the Analysis Auth (rsecadmin)  like, Compcode, salesorg, co area, etc.
    I have entered the field values and generated. Now included this in a role for a reporting user which contains the objects s_rs_comp and s_rs_comp1 for which Comp1 given full *.
    Now the test user is able to create the queries based on the restrictions assinged, like company code. But he is not able to execute his own query, where he was given full access. SU53 shows that he doesn't have the access to Execute in S_rs_comp1, where I have maintained * for that.
    Does this mean that, the Charateristics for Analysis Auth will not work if assigned through the objects created from SU21. / or do i need to do something more.
    Can anybody help please.
    Thanks for the help.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi JC,
    The idea given by you is good. I tried, it. But its not working securely.
    I created one analysis auth for all common characteristics. and dvarious for different company codes and controlling areas.
    like grouped the following as one
    Company Code, Controlling Area, Keyfigues.
    I assigned a user a role like this. Take for example ODS A and B. Comp Codes, CC1 and CC2, Controling areas CA1 and CA2.
    assigned the Reporting roles like this. where
    1) ODS A > CC1 (CA ) (KF)
    2) ODS B > CA2 (CC) (KF)
    when checked user is able to see all the controlling areas on ODS B,where i gave him only CA2.
    That is the problem..

  • For IDOC monitoring, analysis and error handling in  ALE & idoc

    Hello...experts..can u please tell me about idoc monitoring,analysis and error handling..and can u please tell as per interview  point of view in this area..if availble can u send material about this...
    thx
    Message was edited by:
            durga kottapalli

    Hi,
    Reprocessing IDocs with errors
    Outbound (BD88)
    Once the error has been determined and corrected it is not necessary to resend the IDoc again. You simply resend the IDocs that have already been generated.
    Using the IDoc overview screen you need to take note of the following for each IDoc that was not processed:
    Error number: 2, 4, 5, 25, 29
    Error number: 30 (Execute Check IDoc dispatch to process)
    IDoc number
    Using the Error number, the IDoc number and the transaction BD88 , with the required message type you can resend the IDoc. Match the error number with this transaction and execute the function for the IDocs incorrectly processed.
    Just check the below link, u will get all IDOC related Interview questions
    http://www.allsaplinks.com/idoc_sample.html
    http://www.allsaplinks.com/
    http://www.sappoint.com/abap.html
    http://www.sap-img.com/
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCSRVEDISC/CAEDISCAP_STC.pdf
    http://www.netweaverguru.com/EDI/HTML/IDocBook.htm
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CABFAALEQS/CABFAALEQS.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCSRVEDI/CAEDI.pdf
    http://www.sappoint.com/abap.html
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/documents/popular-q-and-a/extending-a-basic-idoc-type-2358
    http://www.sapgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/ale_scenario_development_procedure.doc
    http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/eac/knowledgebaseCategory/0,295197,sid63_tax296858_idx0_off50,00.html
    http://www.sapgenie.com/sapedi/index.htm
    http://www.allsaplinks.com/idoc_sample.html
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCMIDALEIO/BCMIDALEIO.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCMIDALEPRO/BCMIDALEPRO.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/dc/6b7eee43d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/frameset.htm
    http://edocs.bea.com/elink/adapter/r3/userhtm/ale.htm#1008419
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/dc/6b835943d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm
    http://www.sap-img.com/
    http://www.allsaplinks.com/
    Regards,
    Suresh.
    Message was edited by:
            SureshKumar Ramamoorthy

  • Analysis auth obj assigment

    Hi
       Iam created one auth obj in rsec admin. how can i assign the auth obj to user .My answer is  1)direct assigment 2) through roles.
    for example: created analysis auth obj is : ztest_1
    It have the info obj : 0customer. and iam entered two values(values : A & B) in detail tab.
    In role tab where i have to find the created analysis auth obj.to assign values .like below
    Now i would like to assign this auth obj to user1 through role only for the customer value A .
    For user2 i have to restricted vale B.
    In direct assigment path will be the user>assign>specify the user name (user A)> give the created analysis auth obj (ztest_1)>select insert.
    This is the  process ...right?
    Now i would like to assign only one value (value A for the user A).How it is possiable in direct assigment..
    Other wise i have to create diff analysis auth obj(ztest_1...etc) for diff values(A &B)f or particular info obj(customer)?
    Thanks
    B.K
    Edited by: B.K on Jul 15, 2008 12:44 PM

    Hello B.K.,
    When you create an authorization ztest_1 with 0customer with values A & B, this will always have the two values for the customer just like it was before with the old authorization method.
    So no matter what way you assign this authorization to the user it will always have the two values!
    To separate (filter) only one value (A or B) you have to create two different authorizations, one for customer A and one for customer B.
    To assign, the direct assignment is just like you referred.
    To assign with the roles, go to the desired role in PFCG, enter in change mode, go to tab Authorizations tab and click on change authorization data (pencil button).
    Inside there, click on manual insert objects (something like this) and insert the object name S_RS_AUTH.
    You'll have a yellow sign.
    Expand that tree where the yellow sign is and click on the pencil button in front of the last yellow sign of the tree.
    In "Value from" in that next window insert the name of the authorization (in your example ztest_1).
    Generate your role.
    Now if you assign that role to the user "user1" in transaction su01.
    If ztest_1 has the values A & B for customer then user1 will have both values. If you separate the two authorizations let's say ztest_1A and ztest_1B with respectively the values A and B separate for the 0customer object.
    You could assign in the role the value ztest_1A in S_RS_AUTH values, and assign that role to the user "user1" in su01, and you could direct assign (just like you referred before) to the user2 the authorization object ztest_1B.
    Therefore you'll have user1 with the value A and user2 with the value B.
    Please assign points,
    Diogo.

  • Read System Analysis Data Error - Sol 10 u5 x86

    This morning, smpatch analyze and update via updatemanager will not work, giving this error:
    "Read System Analysis Data Error
    There is an error in reading system analysis data. Click on "Check for Updates" to restart a system analysis. If the problem persists, report the issue to your sysadmin or Sun."
    Is this a temporary problem with the Sun update system computers, or is this something I should worry about?
    Updatemanager worked fine yesterday.

    Never mind. The problem went away.

  • Improper message coming on console  " ftpd[16809]: [ID 487707 auth.error] load_modules: can not open module /usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1"

    Hi All,
    I am using solaris 10u10 on Sun Fire platform. I am getting below message on cosole.
    ftpd[16809]: [ID 776383 auth.error] open_module: stat(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1) failed: No such file or directory
    ftpd[16809]: [ID 487707 auth.error] load_modules: can not open module /usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1
    ftpd[16810]: [ID 776383 auth.error] open_module: stat(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1) failed: No such file or directory
    ftpd[16810]: [ID 487707 auth.error] load_modules: can not open module /usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1
    ftpd[16815]: [ID 776383 auth.error] open_module: stat(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1) failed: No such file or directory
    ftpd[16815]: [ID 487707 auth.error] load_modules: can not open module /usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1
    ftpd[16816]: [ID 776383 auth.error] open_module: stat(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1) failed: No such file or directory
    ftpd[16816]: [ID 487707 auth.error] load_modules: can not open module /usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1
    ftpd[16817]: [ID 776383 auth.error] open_module: stat(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1) failed: No such file or directory
    ftpd[16817]: [ID 487707 auth.error] load_modules: can not open module /usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1
    Also the file is present on the server 
    root@atrcx1454/var/adm> ls -lrt /usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1
    -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     bin        20652 Mar 19  2008 /usr/lib/security/pam_unix_session.so.1
    Can anyone help why above message is coming on console

    Is the ftp daemon that you use provided by the Solaris media ? If this is not the case, then would recommend to contact the software maintainer for more help.
    And regarding chroot, please check this URL to know what it is : Sandbox (computer security) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Depending how this environment is configured, the library is maybe not present in this one.

  • I keep getting error 3322 suberror 1000136 DRM auth. error using Firefox

    I keep getting error 3322 suberror 1000136 DRM auth. error using Firefox but have no problem playing same content in Chrome. I uninstalled and reinstalled Firefox but kept personal settings, which did not fix the problem. Can you help?

    You may have had a change in hardware since the last time you accessed protected content with Firefox. To reset the protected content licenses, go to the settings manager, and click on Reset Content Licenses. Here is a link to the settings manager: http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager08.htm l
    See also this forum post: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3051713
    We are working on automatic recovery from this error condition.

  • Mail Server Error - 21055: auth: Error: od?

    Hi,
    Just upgraded to OSX 10.8 Mountain Lion, now my email services have gone AWOL.
    The server logs are telling me  [DateTime domain.com] log[21055]:auth: Error: od (username, ip address): authentication failed for user=me, method=DIGEST-MD5
    From a client (MS offlook) point of view I'm getting :
    Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
    Subject:    test
          Sent: 06/08/2012 19:09
    The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:
          '[email protected]' on 06/08/2012 19:10
                451 4.3.5 <unknown[ip address]>: Client host rejected: Server configuration error
    This used to work quite well with Lion and the Server Admin Tools.
    Is there anything I can try?
    Thanks in advance,
    Jeff.

    Thanks for getting back to me red shift, everything is now up and working again. 
    I think it was somthing to do with some folder permissions and some mail settings.  The mail server GUI supplied with Mountain Lion is all but useless and didn't help in any way in tracking down or resolving the problem. So, I've taken the plunge and set up MailServ for Mountain lion, its a much better mail server GUI client, and seemed to correct some of my postfix settings.
    I've tinkered a bit with command line mail stuff, but not quite at a level where I can fully administer it.
    Are there any good command line resources out there?  This is somthing I need to improve on.
    Cheers.

  • UCCX 8.5.1 SU2 traffic analysis report errors out

    Anyone run into this before, I'm not seeing a bug fixed for this issue in SU3 either.
    If we have a call center outage or some issue effecting services, one day a month, and try to run the IVR traffic analysis report for the whole month (where one day we had outage) the report for that timeframe fails to run. If we adjust the report begin/end time to end before problem day/hour the report runs fine. Same for after that time to end of the month. We can also run the report for the single day of outage (whole 24 hour period) without problem to which is strange.
    Regarding the outage, it is where UCCX services stop for some reason. This is HA WAN setup. The systems were not powered down or shutdown unexpectedly. 
    Seems it is choking on the data and trying to divde by zero....
    We see this in logs,
    1: 11/6/2012 8:56:32 AM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:0 :Final Font Size=$rptFontSize
    1: 12/6/2012 11:20:36 AM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:The following SQL Command failed due to ()SQL Command=[call sp_ivr_traffic_analysis ('2012-11-01 5:00:00', '2012-12-01 5:59:59', -18000, 0 )]
    2: 12/6/2012 11:20:36 AM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:TraceDBError #1:(ADO Error# -2147467259|Description E22012: (-1202) An attempt was made to divide by zero.|Source Ifxoledbc|SQLState |NativeError -1202)
    3: 12/6/2012 11:20:36 AM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:Database Error | A runtime error occurred while executing the query. Please check log for more details
    4: 12/6/2012 11:30:32 AM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:Failed to run Interpreted SQL Command(call sp_ivr_traffic_analysis ('2012-11-01 5:00:00', '2012-12-01 5:59:59', -18000, 0 ))
    5: 12/6/2012 11:34:52 AM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:The following SQL Command failed due to ()SQL Command=[call sp_ivr_traffic_analysis ('2012-11-01 5:00:00', '2012-12-01 5:59:59', -18000, 0 )]
    6: 12/6/2012 11:34:52 AM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:TraceDBError #1:(ADO Error# -2147467259|Description E22012: (-1202) An attempt was made to divide by zero.|Source Ifxoledbc|SQLState |NativeError -1202)
    7: 12/6/2012 11:34:52 AM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:Database Error | A runtime error occurred while executing the query. Please check log for more details
    8: 12/6/2012 12:02:53 PM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:Failed to run Interpreted SQL Command(call sp_ivr_traffic_analysis ('2012-11-01 5:00:00', '2012-12-01 5:59:59', -18000, 0 ))
    9: 12/6/2012 4:00:13 PM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:The following SQL Command failed due to ()SQL Command=[call sp_ivr_traffic_analysis ('2012-11-01 5:00:00', '2012-12-01 5:59:59', -18000, 0 )]
    10: 12/6/2012 4:00:13 PM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:TraceDBError #1:(ADO Error# -2147467259|Description E22012: (-1202) An attempt was made to divide by zero.|Source Ifxoledbc|SQLState |NativeError -1202)
    11: 12/6/2012 4:00:13 PM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:Database Error | A runtime error occurred while executing the query. Please check log for more details
    12: 12/6/2012 4:18:56 PM %CHC-LOG_SUBFAC-3-UNK:Failed to run Interpreted SQL Command(call sp_ivr_traffic_analysis ('2012-11-01 5:00:00', '2012-12-01 5:59:59', -18000, 0 ))

    Mohammed,
    It is common, in many of the Cisco Express 8.5 environments we have looked at, for the Total Incoming Calls given on a Traffic Analysis report to be a higher number than an Application Report.
    The Traffic Analysis Report counts every unique sessionID (unique call) that is inbound (contact type of 1).  The Application Reports do a similar thing but qualify (filter) only the records that have an application assigned.
    There are simply times where inbound calls have been directed to an "agent" without having an applicaiton assigned.
    The best thing the reporting user can do is to run a query on his or her database such as: 
         select * from ContactCallDetail where contactType=1and startDateTime > '2012-11-16 10:00:00' and startDateTime < '2012-11-16 11:00:00';
    Usually when an application is not assigned to the record in the ContactCallDetail table it is because the destination type is equal to 1, which is an 'Agent' instead of a 'route point'.
    So if you modify your select statement to filter by destinationType, you can quickly find the records that don't have the application assigned. 
    Example:  select * from ContactCallDetail where contactType = 1 and destinationType = 1 and startDateTime > '2012-11-16 10:00:00 and startDateTime < 2012-11-16 11:00:00';
    When you look at these records, you will see the agent that took the call from the destinationID field.  The number in that field should match up with the field called 'resourceID' in a table called 'resouce';
         Example:  select * from resource where resouce=6011; where 6011 was the number you found in the destinationID field.
    If there is still confusion about the source of the call - then talk to that agent and find out what is was.
    Good Luck and let me know if you need further help.
    Ron Reif
    [email protected]

  • Interactive Analysis Desktop Error: c3_olap_error_en_10901 (WIS 10901)

    Hi all,
    Running BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 4.0 I built a business layer between a BW infocube as infoprovider and a while refreshing the webi report in interactive analysis desktop the above error message pops up.
    I used the infoprovider successfully for a BEx query on which I run a "traditional" universe successfully. I further used those objects for a prototype in SBO explorer. Hence I don't see a reason why the Infocube isn't working for the new business layer. I am pretty sure the issue lies in between the infoprovider and the webi report.
    Thanks for your inputs!
    Sven
    The detailed error message is:
    com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.CommunicationException$UnexpectedServerException: c3_olap_error_en_10901
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.core.exception.ExceptionBuilder.make(ExceptionBuilder.java:144)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.core.exception.ExceptionBuilder.make(ExceptionBuilder.java:101)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.common.CommonRequestHandler.afterProcessing(CommonRequestHandler.java:122)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.internal.AbstractServer.processIt(AbstractServer.java:178)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.internal.AbstractServer.process(AbstractServer.java:133)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.internal.InstanceServer.process(InstanceServer.java:93)
         at com.sap.sl.sdk.services.util.ServerRequestProcessor.processServerRequest(ServerRequestProcessor.java:49)
         at com.sap.sl.sdk.dataprovider.service.DataProviderServiceImpl.processDataProviderCommand(DataProviderServiceImpl.java:366)
         at com.sap.sl.sdk.dataprovider.service.DataProviderServiceImpl.processDataProviderCommand(DataProviderServiceImpl.java:378)
         at com.sap.sl.sdk.dataprovider.service.DataProviderServiceImpl.run(DataProviderServiceImpl.java:164)
         at com.sap.sl.sdk.workspace.service.WorkspaceServiceImpl.run(WorkspaceServiceImpl.java:331)
         at com.sap.webi.ui.tasks.workflows.RunWorkspaceTask.doIt(RunWorkspaceTask.java:73)
         at com.sap.webi.ui.tasks.workflows.RunWorkspaceTask.doIt(RunWorkspaceTask.java:11)
         at com.sap.webi.toolkit.ui.tasks.WebITask.doInBackground(WebITask.java:109)
         at javax.swing.SwingWorker$1.call(SwingWorker.java:278)
         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
         at javax.swing.SwingWorker.run(SwingWorker.java:317)
         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
    Caused by: com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.ServerException: c3_olap_error_en_10901
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.common.CommonRequestHandler.newServerException(CommonRequestHandler.java:237)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.common.CommonRequestHandler.createAllServerExceptions(CommonRequestHandler.java:215)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.common.CommonRequestHandler.afterProcessing(CommonRequestHandler.java:118)
         ... 18 more

    HI ,
    Even i'm facing the same error. Could you tell me which patch(details) is this and form where can i get it?
    Thanks and regards,
    Abhishek

Maybe you are looking for