BI AUTHORISATION - Aggregation Check and Aggregation Authorization

Hi all,
The Aggregation Check and Aggregation Authorization in BI Analysis AUTHORISATION?  I want to know why is it when I take the ( out of my 0EMPLOYEE
0HRPOSITION and 0ORGUNIT, it comes up with a authorisation failures, but when I add this ( colan it works fine.
im kind of understood what it means, but not aware of why when i add and remove its behaving like this?
thanks everyone.

Hi there again,
Then you can try this:
Pickup a query as an example. That query is build over lets say infoProvider A.
Than you go to transaction RSECADMIN and create a ZDUMMY authorization. You give a description. Then you click on the InfoProvider button and insert the name A and click enter. Mark all characteristics but don't mark the options of : values neither the * values.
You'll see several characteristics added to your new authorization but with no values. Now double click each one and assign the values you want the test user to access.
Afterwards click on the special charact. button at the left of the InfoProvider button. Now, three new characteristics are added:
0TCAACTVT
0TCAIPROV
0TCAVALID
And values are automatically assigned to them. They can be left like that, they will be OK. 0TCAACTVT represents activity and can have the value 03, of display of the values; 0TCAIPROV represents InfoProvider and by default those authorization values will be for every InfoProvider, if you want you can change it from * to the value A, in this case, your InfoProvider A; 0TCAVALID can be *, which is valid for ever.
After that save the authorization and assign it to the test user.
Now test it, and you'll see only the values that you assign before in your ZDUMMY authorization will be valid for that query.
Diogo.

Similar Messages

  • How to check and maintain authorization objects

    Hi  Alll            
    Let me knowhow to check and maintain authorization objects  in SU24 ECC 6.0.
    Thanks
    sathies

    Hi Sathies,
    the old check flags
    U
    Unmaintained
    No indicator set. The check for corresponding authorization object is always executed. Field values are not displayed in the Profile Generator.
    N
    No check
    Check disabled. Field values are not displayed in the Profile Generator. This indicator cannot be set for HR and Basis authorization objects.
    C
    Check
    Check always executed. Field values are not displayed in the Profile Generator. For example: Printer authorizations.
    CM
    Check/maintain
    Check always executed. Field values are displayed for changing in the Profile Generator (yellow light).
    Have been divided now in
    Checkindicator : Check/NoCheck
    and
    Proposal: Yes/No.
    If defaults=yes, then you can modify them after clicking on the apropriate button.
    Please refer to the online help for SU24 too.
    Although the look of su24 has been changed significantly, the technique behind it is still the same.
    Once you have pressed the 'edit'-button on the top left corner, additional editing options will appear in the right-top-frame.
    b.rgds,
    Bernhard

  • Upload text file to oracle table with checking and aggregation

    Hi Friends,
    I am new to ODI.  I have encountered a problem which is specific to ODI 11G (11.1.1.6.3) to upload text file to oracle table with checking and aggregation.  Would you please teach me how to implement the following requirement in ODI 11G?
    Input text file a:
    staffCode, staffCat, status, data
    input text file b:
    staffCodeStart, staffCodeEnd, staffCat
    temp output oracle table c:
    staffCat, data
    output oracle table d:
    staffCat, data
    order:
    a.staffCode, a.staffCat, a.status
    filter:
    a.status = ‘active’
    join:
    a left outerjoin b on a.staffCode between b.staffCodeStart and b.staffCodeEnd
    insert temp table c:
    c.staffCat = if b.staffCat is not null then b.staffCat else a.staffCat
    c.data = a.data
    insert table d:
    if c.staffCat between 99 and 1000 then d.staffCat = c.staffCat, d.data = sum(c.data)
    else d.staffCat = c.staffCat, d.data = LAST(c.data)
    Any help on fixing this is highly appreciated. Thanks!!
    Thanks,
    Chris

    Dear Santy,
    Many thanks for your prompt reply.  May I have more information about the LAST or SUM step?
    I was successful to create and run the following interfaces p and q
    1. Drag text file a to a newly created interface panel p
    2. Filter text file a : a.status = ‘active’
    3. Lookup text file a to text file b : a.staffCode between b.staffCodeStart and b.staffCodeEnd
    4. Drag oracle temp table c to interface panel p
    5. Set c.staffCat : CASE WHEN b.staffCat IS NULL THEN a.staffCat ELSE b.staffCat END
    6. Set c.data : a.data
    7. Drag oracle temp table c to a newly created interface panel q
    8. Drag oracle table d to interface panel q
    9. Set UK to d.staffCat
    10. Set Distinct Rows to table d
    11. Set d.staffCat = c.staffCat
    12. Set d.data = SUM(c.data)
    However, the interface q should be more than that:
    If c.staffCat is between 99 and 1000, then d.data = the last record c.data; else d.data = sum(c.data)
    Would you please teach me how to do the LAST or SUM steps?  Moreover, can interface p and interface q be combined to one interface and do not use the temp table c?  Millions thanks!
    Regards,
    Chris

  • BI aggregated authorization (colon)

    Hi
    We're having a discussion regarding BI Authorization and aggregared levels.
    The authorization is on both level "0PLANT" and 0PURCH_ORG" and the discussion is about to put in colon for aggregated authorization.
    Is there any risk with this? Could this be equivalent with "star" in som cases on aggregated level? or is it totaly safe to fut this value?
    https://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/46/932b839c8019ade10000000a11466f/frameset.htm

    HI Jacob,
    : is not considered as a star value. In fact  ':' is used to pass the authorization check that happens when auth relevant characteristic is present in the Info provider/Multi provider on which the report is built on and we don't want to restrict the report on that characteristic ( Info object)  but also did not want to give star value. hence its absolutely safe to use ':' for those info objects.
    Thanks,
    Kalpana.

  • Aggregation authorization within analysis authorizations

    Hello,
    The BW developers have created several queries that use aggregated data. When testing the queries with the end user ID (assigned to an end user role and analysis authorization), it is failing due to missing authorizations, particularly b/c of the following:
    Supplementation of Selection for Aggregated
    Characteristics
      Check Added for Aggregation Authorization:     0COMP_CODE  
      Check Added for Aggregation Authorization:     0PLANT  
    All Authorizations Tested
      Message EYE007: You Do Not Have Sufficient Authorization  
      No Sufficient Authorization for This Subselection (SUBNR)  
    Following CHANMIDs Are Affected:
    142 ( 0COMP_CODE )
    189 ( 0PLANT )
    192 ( 0SALESORG )
    In the BI documentation, it specifies that : (colon): allows only aggregated access to data (e.g. allows information on all sales areas only on aggregated level –not on particular countries). Is this ( specified as a value within the particular characteristics? I also tried to select the "aggregation authorization" icon within txn code RSECADMIN and this did not help.
    Any help would be GREATLY appreciated.

    Updated: For the analysis authorization, for these characteristics, in addition to the specific values, there is an entry for ":" and this did not resolve the issue.
    Authorization Check  
      Detail Check for InfoProvider ZBL_13IT  
      Preprocessing:  
    Selection Checked for Consistency, Preprocessed and Supplemented As Needed
    Subselection (Technical SUBNR) 1
    Check Node Definitions and Value Authorizations...
    Node- and Value Authorizations Are OK
    End of Preprocessing
      Main Check:  
      Subselection (Technical SUBNR) 1  
    Supplementation of Selection for Aggregated Characteristics
      Check Added for Aggregation Authorization:     0COMP_CODE  
      Check Added for Aggregation Authorization:     0PLANT  
    Following Set Is Checked  Comparison with Following Authorized Set  Result  Restmenge 
    Characteristic  Contents 
    0PLANT
    0SALESORG
    0TCAACTVT
    0COMP_CODE
    SQL Format:
    COMP_CODE = ':'
    AND PLANT = ':'
    AND SALES
    ORG = '0403'
    AND TCAACTVT = '03'
    Characteristic  Contents 
    0PLANT  I EQ IC01
    I EQ IC02
    I EQ IC03
    I EQ IE02
    I EQ IE04
    I EQ IZ01
    I EQ MC01
    I EQ ME01
    I EQ :
    0SALESORG  I EQ 0301
    I EQ 0341
    I EQ :
    0TCAACTVT  I EQ 03
    I EQ :
    0COMP_CODE  I EQ 0327
    I EQ 0341
    I EQ :
    Not Authorized   
    All Authorizations Tested
      Message EYE007: You Do Not Have Sufficient Authorization  
      No Sufficient Authorization for This Subselection (SUBNR)  
    Following CHANMIDs Are Affected:
    142 ( 0COMP_CODE )
    189 ( 0PLANT )
    192 ( 0SALESORG )
      Authorization Check Complete

  • ITunes does not allow me to download at Store "You do not have authority to write in iTunes Media files. Adapt your authorisation in explorer and check for available downloads in Store

    As administrator of my pc icannot download musc/video from Store: the message (translated from Dutch) "You do not have authority to write in iTunes Media files. Adjust your authorisation in explorer and check for available downloads in Store

    Hey! I had the same problem you did just today when I was trying to get my second iPhone to sync. What you need to do with music or anything extra that you doing you have to creat a second playlist or picture or anything that you would like to use, so that you can add to the second device that you are going to be using. I am not sure if that will help but it helped me out a lot!! Good luck!

  • When I click the download apps,itunes ask me to authorise this computer and I finish do it, it ask me authorize again and again

    when I click the download apps,itunes ask me to authorise this computer and I finish do it, it ask me authorize again and again

    Delete the song from your Itunes music list, then redownload it, Itunes will ask you if you if you want to download it for free.  This seems to be the fix for my problems.

  • Authorisation error : Check user id and password

    Hi,
    Just out of the blues our production box started giving out this error " Authorisation error : Check user id and pwd" ..All the users are valid users and SLD and RWB in the Java GUI but the IR and ID do not log in...Has anybody faced this error before ..Any advise please..
    -Teresa

    > Hi,
    >
    > Just out of the blues our production box started
    > d giving out this error " Authorisation error : Check
    > user id and pwd" ..All the users are valid users and
    > SLD and RWB in the Java GUI but the IR and ID do not
    > log in...Has anybody faced this error before ..Any
    > advise please..
    >
    > -Teresa
    Hi Guys,
    I restarted the J2EE and it solved all these issues..But my question is what would have triggered this as I haven't upgraded or added any patches...The only activity we did was to recycle our entire box recently..Thanks for the suggestions..I can't find the points icon..I would like to award you some..
    -Teresa

  • Check and repair authorisations

    This utility program does not work since on 10.5.2.
    Never finishes afetr hours and hours.
    What is the solution to run this checking and repair.
    Thanks
    Marc

    In Leopard (10.5) it does take a long time to repair permissions (authorizations). It should complete well short of an hour, though. Have you tried just letting it run overnight?
    If you search these forums for "Repair permissions doesn't finish", you'll find quite a few entries. I didn't look through them, but you may find some help.

  • I upgraded my iphone 4 to ios7 and syncd it, however after i restored my backup I couldnt sync because itunes claims my pc is no longer authorised for purchased items on my phone. I have repeatedly authorised the pc, and still receive the same error

    I upgraded my iphone 4 to ios7 and syncd it, however after i restored my backup I couldnt sync because itunes claims my pc is no longer authorised for purchased items on my phone. I have repeatedly authorised the pc, and still receive the same error

    Hello m2205
    Check out the article below to troubleshoot your authorization issue within iTunes, you may need to remove the SC Info folder.
    iTunes repeatedly prompts to authorize computer to play iTunes Store purchases
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1389
    Regards,
    -Norm G.

  • Performing check and potential update for status control table

    Cheers Experts,
    I searched in the forum, but I didn't find an answer.
    I'm working on a 3.0B BW system.
    After updating from PSA to an ODS, in the log I see the following line:
    "Performing check and potential update for status control table" and double clicking on it, it says:
    If data is loaded into an InfoCube, or existing data is edited (aggregated/compressed/deleted/got from a DataMart), then there is a change in  the potential reportability of the data , or the possibility of deleting data by request, or of aggregating or compressing.
    This status of each one of these Cubes is stored in a status table, that is updated when there is any change to the status of a request in the Cube.
    The system now analyzes the requests in the Cube and compares the calculated status with the status table.
    If deviations from the status table arise then you are given the option of adjusting the status table.                                         
    I have 2 questions:
    1) What is BW doing, mainly because I'm working on an ODS and not an Infocube?
    2) What can I do to reduce its execution time, since it lasts several minutes?
    Thanks and greetings.
    Roberto

    Roberto, did you ever find an answer to your question?  We also are experiencing long runtimes during this particular process running 3.x deltas from ODS to ODS and cubes.

  • Query to fetch users and User Authorizations

    Hi
    I have a task to retrieve the all users and the authorizations. I am trying to run a query to get the results.
    Inorder to get the users, I use
    select * from OUSR
    But I am stuck with authorizations.
    Can anyone help.
    Thanks in advance.
    MSJ.

    Hi Manoj,
    It is not possible in SAPB1.
    Try to Export to Excel File.
    check the thread,
    Re: Authorisations List
    Regards,
    Madhan.

  • HT3702 My bank was charge me the following amount of USD 1. But i do not have any purchase of USD1. Please check and refund.

    My bank was charged me the following amount of USD 1. But i do not have any purchase of USD1. Please check and refund.

    We are fellow users here on these user-to-user forums, you're not talking to iTunes Support nor Apple.
    The HT3702 page that you posted from tells you what it is :
    As with many other merchants, the iTunes Store and Mac App Store places an authorization hold on your payment card account for the approximate amount of any purchase you make. If you update your billing information, the iTunes Store or Mac App Store will place an authorization hold on your payment card account, usually in the amount of 1 USD or the local currency equivalent, to verify your account information.
    Authorization holds are removed by your financial institution shortly after your purchase clears. The time it takes to remove authorization requests varies by financial institution.

  • BBP_PS_PROJECT_GET_LIST: Checks for Change Authorization.

    Hi,
    I have a custom SAP program that is required to fetch pertinent details from a project.
    The SAP function module BBP_PS_PROJECT_GET_LIST retrieves several internal tables is used for this purpose. 
    For some reason this function module, which looks like it should only retrieve information and cannot perform changes itself, checks for Change authorization to object C_AFKO_ACT.  As a result, users with Change access to projects can run this and get the appropriate results (in internal table IT_AFVC).  However, users with Display access only to projects do not have any data returned back in this same structure.
    Any idea on how to go about this problem?
    Regards
    Jibat

    Hi,
    See also the foll related  notes before you implement the corrections in the note 818342 based on your current SP level for SRM 4.0.
    Note 742314 - BADI for approver selection when adding/changing approvers
    Note 802581 - Error in call "BBP_WFLH_AGENTS_FOR_CHANGE_GET"
    BR,
    Disha.
    Do reward points for  useful answers.

  • Tacacs problem with ACS 4.2 NDG and shell authorization sets

    Hi all,
    I am trying to solve this problem without success so far. I have fresh ACS 4.2.15 patch 5 ACS installation and I am tryng to deploy it to our environment. So I have configured one 2960S to be my test client and everything works fine. Problem is when I try to create fine grained policies using network device groups and shell authorization sets.
    I have created shell authorization sets called ReadOnly and FullAccess. I have also created NDG called FloorSwitches and added my 2960. I have 2 user groups called FloorSwitchesReadOnly and FloorSwithcesFullAccess. Now, if I configure group FloorSwitchesFullAccess and assign Shell command authorization set per NDG and then log into the switch, all of my commands are refused as unauthorized.
    One thing that I have noticed is that if I assign shell command authorization set to any device ( in user group settings ) it works fine. Or if I create association with DEFAULT NDG in user group it also works. So my conclusion is that ACS for some reason does not associate my switch with correct group but rather puts it to DEFAULT group for some reason.
    Did anyone had similar problem or is there something that I am doing in a wrong way? Is there another way to achieve such thing without using NDG's?
    Thanks everyone....

    Please upgrade to patch 6, there is a bug in patch 5 and you can check the release notes or the readme for more information.
    What is your user setting set to while you are testing command authorization, did you set it back to the group setting?
    Thanks,
    Tarik Admani

Maybe you are looking for

  • PR to PO conversion error

    Hi, I have created a service interface for PRtoPO conversion with 3 operations [Query, Read and Create(or Conversion) ]. In the Query operation I get a list of open PRs. In the Read operation I get the details of a single PR (like PR no, item no, mat

  • Page does not display

    hi, im trying to create a JSP web app but instead of displaying the intended output (a form and a String), the browser shows the code instead. what must i do to make the page display properly? //codes are in add.jsp <%@ page language="java" %> <%@ pa

  • Problem with custom_logic badi and it_param - ujk_large_string 1024

    Hi experts, I have a Problem triggering a script with custom logic badi. I try to implement a data and comment copy package for alle dimensions with source and target. Target is pushed in one string to IT_PARAM table of type UJK_T_SCRIPT_LOGIC_HASHTA

  • When burning a bluray I get this error message: Total bitrate is too high near time = 4.760000

    When burning a bluray I get this error message: Total bitrate is too high near time = 4.760000 The video is encoded with sonic cinevison as avchd file and one AC3 file.

  • RAID with Disk Utility question

    I've setup a RAID array in disk utility for an external SATA NAS that I have. The Silicon Image Si3132 drivers are not working for Snow Leopard (the SATARAID 5 drivers) so I've installed the base non-raid drivers for 10.6. I'm using Disk Utility to s