BI-IP To track the planning changes after Data Locking

Hi All,
Need your help to design solution for one critical user requirement in IP.
We all know that in CC Planning, every month after certain date we lock the planning tool and freeze the data. But on exceptional basis, we might require to unlock planning tool to allow users to do some changes in planning data.
User wants to track these changes and report it out. Is there any standard functionality that SAP-IP has provided to track these kind of changes? If not what is the best way to achieve this?
Appreciate any input regarding this ! Thanks a lot!
Som

Hi,
You need to have additional characteristics for User & Date in your RTP to record who changed when and what plan record.
Then you can create a characteristic relationship of type 'Exit Class' to derive User Id(last changed by) and the date(last modified).
Itu2019s not necessary to include User-ID and Date in any of the aggregation levels, but the Source Characteristic(Company code may be in your case) based on which the values are derived for User-ID & Date, must be present in each aggregation level.
Then create a custom class say ZCL_LOC_CR_LINE_ITEM by taking class CL_RSPLS_CR_EXIT_BASE as super class and then redefine the method DERIVE of interface IF_RSPLS_CR_METHODS in your class.
You can write following code in your method DERIVE:
CLEAR e_t_mesg.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <l_chavl> TYPE ANY.
ASSIGN COMPONENT '/BIC/ZUSERID' OF STRUCTURE c_s_chas TO <l_chavl>.
<l_chavl> = sy-uname.
ASSIGN COMPONENT '0DATE' OF STRUCTURE c_s_chas TO <l_chavl>.
<l_chavl> = sy-datlo.
This will solve your purpose.
Regards,
Deepti

Similar Messages

Explain plan change after partitioning - Bitmap conversion to rowid

hi gurus,
before partitioning the table using range paritioning,
for the query,
SELECT MEDIUMID
          FROM MEDIUM_TB
          WHERE CMREFERENCEID =8
           AND CONTENTTYPEID = 8
           AND CMSTATUSID = 5
           AND SUBTYPEID = 99
A. before partitioning
SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS          2452     882     16758
SORT ORDER BY               2452     882     16758
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     DBA1     MEDIUM_TB     2451     882     16758
   BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS
    BITMAP AND
     BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
      INDEX RANGE SCAN      DBA1     MEDIUM_TB_IX07     242     94423
     BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
      INDEX RANGE SCAN      DBA1     MEDIUM_TB_IX02     1973     94423
B. after partitioning
the explain plan changed to
SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS          33601     796     15124
TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID     DBA1     MEDIUM_TB     33601     796     15124
INDEX RANGE SCAN     DBA1     MEDIUM_TB_IX07     300     116570     as you can see in the plan, the paln cost is very high after partitioning and the query is taking more time.
index MEDIUM_TB_IX02 is not used in the second plan and also the plan method BITMAP CONVERSION.
fyi, there is all the indexes are b-tree based and global indexes.
what could be reason for the plan change?
please help
thanks,
charles

user570138 wrote:
SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS          2452     882     16758
SORT ORDER BY               2452     882     16758
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     DBA1     MEDIUM_TB     2451     882     16758
BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS
BITMAP AND
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN      DBA1     MEDIUM_TB_IX07     242     94423
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN      DBA1     MEDIUM_TB_IX02     1973     94423
If you supplied proper execution plans we might be able to offer some advice.
Use dbms_xplan.
A list of the index definitions might also help
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

What is the effect of the planned order after it is converted to production

Hello Gurus,
1.There was a planned order with wrong date 2041 instead of 2011
2. plannedorder is already converted to production order and is visble in assignment tab of the production order
3.when I am tryng to display the planned order it gives error planned order is not exists.
4. Production order is already delivered
Now will there be any effect on finanace or any other ,if the planned order was created with wrong date,
can we now change the date of planned order , but it says does not exist as it is already converted to prod order.
Please let me know the implications of wrong date and how we can correct the date from 2041 to 2011
Thanks in Advance
Himakar

Dear Himakar,
As explained by our forum member,once after the planned order is converted into production order,the entire planned order
details gets deleted from table PLAF and the planned order dates can be changed in the production order and there is no
business impact other than the planned/production/actual dates.
However the planned order no deatils can be checked in the production order.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

I recently upgraded from Leopard to Snow Leopard and I noticed that I have more capacity available on the Macintosh HD. I checked my files and applications and they are still on my computer. Can capacity on the HD change after an OS upgrade?

I recently upgraded from Leopard to Snow Leopard on my MacBook and I noticed that I have more capacity on the Macintosh HD than before the upgrade. I checked my files and applications and they are still on my computer and nothing appears to be missing. Before the upgrade I had around 111 GB capacity with around 10.50 GB available on the Mac HD but now after the upgrade I have 119 GB capacity and 20.92 GB available. Can capacity on the HD change after an OS upgrade?

No, but the upgrade removed unneeded PowerPC code and changed the way free space is determined.
(72071)

How to identify or track the latest changes in database objects

Hi,
I am working in an application which has Oracle 10 g for backend.
the application in total has around 30 tables and around 25 packages. I want to track the latest changes made in database. The database is accessible to my team of 20 members and i want to keep track what all changes in database(tables ,packages) are being made by them.Which package or table is being affected?
Can yanyone please suggest how to track the same?

To track table changes see following discussion: Re: How to find Last modified/updated time of a particular table

Where can we track the Address Change Details

Hi all,
Where can we track the Address Change Details either through forms or tables
How can we differentiate the old and new addresses
Thanks in advance

select person_id, count(*)
from per_addresses
where trunc(sysdate) between date_from and nvl(date_to,sysdate)
group by person_id
having count(*) > 1;
check columns ADDRESS_TYPE & PRIMARY_FLAG.
These determine whether the address is primary or not, and also what type of address it is.
Cheers,
Vignesh

Process chain is running even after the 'No Schedule After' date

Hi Experts,
          On 19th sep, we scheduled a process chain where the scheduled start date is 20th sep, 07:30:00 and no start after date is 22 sep, 00:00:01. The periodic value is 'Daily' and there is no restrictions for this load.
         But yesterday the process chain ran at 7. We checked tbe jobs that triggered and found that the start date and no start after date is changed to 21 and 23 respectively.
        But the last changed date for the process chain is 19th sep only.
        Anyhow, we removed the process chain from schedule. But, I want to know the reason for this load that loaded even after the 'No start after' date.
       Please help me to know why this issue happened...
Regards,
Yokesh.

I also have been caught by this option once : the "do not start after" is here to avoid problems of scheduling : let imagine your system can be stopped, for any reason, so the scheduling will be postponed. In this case, it avoid, for instance, to load data during the day. It's not for running a PC for only a certain period of time.

Is anyone having trouble unlocking the new iphone after you lock it?

I was wondering if anyone is having trouble unlocking the new Iphone after you lock it? this has happened to me twice and then I have to reset my phone, I never had this problem with the 4s

Go to expresslane.apple.com and go to itunes/itunes store and billing/redemption and apple ID account billing, and click on send an email or talk to a live chat advisor.. have your order numer, cost, and the name of the item... you'll need to explain in detail. If you send an email they will get back to you within 24 hours. If you chat with a live advisor they will assist you immediately. They are really good at getting you a refund when needed.

Explain plan changing after partition exchange

I currently have a data warehouse where I use partition exchange to refresh the data. I'm finding that after a partition exchange of exactly the same data. explain plan changes.
database 11.2.0.2
To demonstrate what I'm doing I simplified the steps.
first I gather stats on the table that will be exchanged and run explain plan
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats( ownname=> 'IDW_TARGET', tabname=> 'PROGRAM_DIM' );
Select
FROM IDW_TARGET.ITD_MONTHLY_SUMMARY_FACT A,
IDW_TARGET.GL_PERIOD_DIM B,
IDW_TARGET.PROGRAM_DIM C,
IDW_TARGET.RPT_ENTITY_DIM D
WHERE ASST_SEC_CONCISE_NAME = 'abc'
AND A.GL_PERIOD_KEY = B.KEY
AND A.PROGRAM_KEY = C.KEY
AND A.RPT_ENTITY_KEY = D.KEY
AND B.PERIOD_YEAR >= 2006;
** uses FTS on fact table and runs in 20 seconds. **
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 25M| 71G| 47105 (1)| 00:09:26 | | | | | |
| 1 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10003 | 25M| 71G| 47105 (1)| 00:09:26 | | | Q1,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 25M| 71G| 47105 (1)| 00:09:26 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 4 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWC | |
| 5 | PX RECEIVE | | 4551 | 1773K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 6 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10000 | 4551 | 1773K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 7 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 4551 | 1773K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 | 1 | 1 | | | |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | RPT_ENTITY_DIM | 4551 | 1773K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 | 1 | 1 | | | |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 25M| 61G| 46999 (1)| 00:09:24 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 10 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWC | |
| 11 | PX RECEIVE | | 184 | 35696 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 12 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10001 | 184 | 35696 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 13 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 184 | 35696 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 1 | | | |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | GL_PERIOD_DIM | 184 | 35696 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 1 | | | |
|* 15 | HASH JOIN | | 25M| 57G| 46992 (1)| 00:09:24 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 16 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWC | |
| 17 | PX RECEIVE | | 4085 | 6829K| 1334 (1)| 00:00:17 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 18 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10002 | 4085 | 6829K| 1334 (1)| 00:00:17 | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 19 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE| | 4085 | 6829K| 1334 (1)| 00:00:17 | 1 | 1 | | | |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PROGRAM_DIM | 4085 | 6829K| 1334 (1)| 00:00:17 | 1 | 1 | | | |
| 21 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 71M| 45G| 45650 (1)| 00:09:08 | 1 | LAST | Q1,03 | PCWC | |
| 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ITD_MONTHLY_SUMMARY_FACT | 71M| 45G| 45650 (1)| 00:09:08 | 1 | 141 | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("A"."RPT_ENTITY_KEY"="D"."KEY")
9 - access("A"."GL_PERIOD_KEY"="B"."KEY")
14 - filter("B"."PERIOD_YEAR">=2006)
15 - access("A"."PROGRAM_KEY"="C"."KEY")
20 - filter("ASST_SEC_CONCISE_NAME"='abc'')
drop table PELPROGRAMDIMALLDATA; -- Start fresh here and drop the partition that will be exchanged
create table PELPROGRAMDIMALLDATA as select * from PROGRAM_DIM; -- going to use exact same data for partition exchange (only one parition)
alter table PELPROGRAMDIMALLDATA add constraint CON_342 unique ("VALUE" ) using index ;
alter table PELPROGRAMDIMALLDATA add constraint CON_343 primary key ("KEY" ) using index ;
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=>'IDW_TARGET', tabname=>'PELPROGRAMDIMALLDATA');
alter table PROGRAM_DIM exchange partition ALL_DATA with table PELPROGRAMDIMALLDATA excluding indexes;
** rebuild indexes **
** explain plan for same statement uses nested loop**
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2637K| 7514M| 33428 (1)| 00:06:42 | | | | | |
| 1 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10003 | 2637K| 7514M| 33428 (1)| 00:06:42 | | | Q1,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 2637K| 7514M| 33428 (1)| 00:06:42 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 4 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWC | |
| 5 | PX RECEIVE | | 4551 | 1773K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 6 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10000 | 4551 | 1773K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 7 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 4551 | 1773K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 | 1 | 1 | | | |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | RPT_ENTITY_DIM | 4551 | 1773K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 | 1 | 1 | | | |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 2637K| 6511M| 33324 (1)| 00:06:40 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 10 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWC | |
| 11 | PX RECEIVE | | 184 | 35696 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 12 | PX SEND BROADCAST | :TQ10001 | 184 | 35696 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 13 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 184 | 35696 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 1 | | | |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | GL_PERIOD_DIM | 184 | 35696 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 1 | | | |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2642K| 6035M| 33318 (1)| 00:06:40 | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 16 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWC | |
| 17 | PX RECEIVE | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 18 | PX SEND ROUND-ROBIN | :TQ10002 | | | | | | | | S->P | RND-ROBIN |
| 19 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 420 | 702K| 220 (0)| 00:00:03 | 1 | 1 | | | |
| 20 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| PROGRAM_DIM | 420 | 702K| 220 (0)| 00:00:03 | 1 | 1 | | | |
|* 21 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PROGRAM_DIM_IX20 | 420 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 | 1 | | | |
| 22 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 6299 | 4201K| 33318 (1)| 00:06:40 | 1 | 9 | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 23 | PARTITION LIST ALL | | 6299 | 4201K| 33318 (1)| 00:06:40 | 1 | LAST | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 24 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID | ITD_MONTHLY_SUMMARY_FACT | 6299 | 4201K| 33318 (1)| 00:06:40 | 1 | 141 | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
| 25 | BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS | | | | | | | | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
|* 26 | BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | ITD_MONTHLY_SUMMARY_SK09 | | | | | 1 | 141 | Q1,03 | PCWP | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("A"."RPT_ENTITY_KEY"="D"."KEY")
9 - access("A"."GL_PERIOD_KEY"="B"."KEY")
14 - filter("B"."PERIOD_YEAR">=2006)
21 - access("ASST_SEC_CONCISE_NAME"='abc')
26 - access("A"."PROGRAM_KEY"="C"."KEY")
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats( ownname=> 'IDW_TARGET', tabname=> 'PROGRAM_DIM' );
** explain plan for same statement uses full table scan**
see first explain plan
Since the stats were not gathered after the partition exchange I would imagine that they would still be used.
Edited by: user12198207 on Feb 7, 2012 8:13 AM
Edited by: user12198207 on Feb 7, 2012 9:47 AM

Locking stats did not make any difference. Also, I deleted the stats at the global level leaving just partition stats and it continued to use the nested loop which takes 15+ minutes instead of 20 seconds with the FTS.
In my original situation it listed the stats at the global level as stale after the partition exchange. But after I removed many of the steps and use just what's described in this posts.
select * from dba_tab_statistics
where table_name='PROGRAM_DIM';
shows stale stats=no for both global and partition. Kind of unexpected. Further digging in shows that is just determined by a case statement.
from dba_tab_statistics view ddl
case
when t.analyzetime is null then null
when ((m.inserts + m.deletes + m.updates) >
t.rowcnt *
to_number(DBMS_STATS.GET_PREFS('STALE_PERCENT',
u.name, o.name))/100 or
bitand(m.flags,1) = 1) then 'YES'
else 'NO'
end

Tracking the table changes

Hi All,
We need to have a trace on the changes(direct/transactional) made to one particular field of a table (LFA1-ESRNR). We have already explored the following options:
--> Attempting the change log in the table is expected to have a huge hit on the system memory.
--> Another option of tracking this field is the data base level is ruled out because it's not recommended practice.
--> The option of logging the changes through vendor master changes is also ruled out because requirement is to track the changes done directly to the table.
Any pointers to this direction would be highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Ashish

Hi Ashish ..
The best way to do is using Change douments .. Since SAP provided the Change doc mainly for this..
Tables: CDHDR and CDPOS.
Tcode: SCDO. Vendor Master : KRED is the Change doc object.
For this the Corresponding data element of LFA1-ESRNR i.e ESRNR is already flagged with Change Document property.
What do u mean by directly updating table .. is it in SE11 or SM30 ..
Then In the Generated Table maintenance program incorporate the Change document logic also .
<b>reward if helpful</b>

Why is the color changed after export?

Hi
The colors of my movie change after i export them.
I tried to find the anser on all kind of forums but i believe i'm the only one with this problem.
My settup:
Mac 24GB 1333MHz DDR3
Eizo CG221

Here are some screenshots.
I've made no color correction.
If you look at the preview, you see it's saturated and the colors are off. And after the export it's back to the origanal colors.
Here are some more specs:
Footage: Proress 422
Sequence settings:

Inspection Plan - Change order date Combination issue

We are facing 1 issue in our system.
The Inspection plan assignments with new change orders is not assigning the correct inspection plan.
Example:
Plan                       Change Number               Valid from Date
1                              CO-1                                1/01/2007
2                              CO-2                                1/01/2008
3                              CO-3                                1/01/2010
The plan selected when Change order CO-2 is cut in, is plan 1 but should be Plan 2. We believe the date on the CO does not drive the selection of the most current plan. When plan 3 is implemented after plan 2, Plan 2 is selected.
Any one has faced this kind of issue in your exp?
Edited by: Tom_Eric on Apr 28, 2010 10:49 PM

No reply

Preventive Maintenance Planning - change call date of future calls

Hello,
we are using time based maintenance plans to schedule our maintenance obligations towards customers. After creating the plan and scheduling (IP10) we get the scheduled calls proposed by the system.
Now we want to use IP10 or IP19 to move those planned call dates that are in the future without releasing the predecssor calls but it gives us an error: "Maintenance plan 16.04.2009: Predecessor to still on hold".
Does anyone know if there is a way around this?
Thanks,
Tobias

Hi Tobias
As per your query... you cannot move the call dates which are in the future. First you have to skip the cal which are before the future cal date. then only you can do...
- Pithan

Partititon1,2,3 in group ODS,FAC status not change after data redistribute

Hello,
first thanks for your help. By now the db2 data redistribute has been sucessful. but another issue occurs , could you give me some suggestion?
1. run Tcode dbacockpit-->db2 for linux, unix, and windows database > configuration>database partiton group
i found the stutus in db partion group NGRP_FAC_AB7 and NGRP_ODS_AB7 and partion 1,2.3. is partion not in partitioning map containers created. I know if we want to change the status from this to partion in partioning map status , we should do a redistribute.
i have made a redistribute action like this
1. double click what i want to distribute
2. select the relevant partition , for example partition 0001
3 click the execute immediatelly button .
when i finished , the status is not changed . so i change the redistribute log located in /db2/db2ab7/sqllib/redist/ AB7.NGRP_FACT_AB7.2008022808582 .
the log message is
Data Redistribution cannot be continued.
Error: Redistribution failed with SQLCODE=-6047 (rc=-2145779603).
the SQL 6047 detail information is like the following. I don't know what happens.
it's a SAP bug just like the previous issue ? Could you give me some suggestion ? Thanks
db2 => ? sql6047
SQL6047N Database partition group cannot be redistributed
because table "<name>" does not have a partitioning
key.
Explanation:
At least one table in the single-node database partition does not
have a partitioning key. All tables in the single-node database
must have a partitioning key before the database partition group
can be redistributed to a multiple-node database partition
group.
The operation was not performed.
User Response:
Use the ALTER TABLE command to specify partitioning keys for
tables that do not have one. Then try the request again

Before redistribution, do your tables reside on only one partition? Does the error message you get list the table or tables that do not have a partitioning key?
All fact tables, ODS tables and PSA tables are created with a partitioning key in a SAP BI system. However, in the FACT and ODS tablespace, there are a few BI management tables (name starting with 'RS') that do not get a partitioning key by default if created in a tablespace on only one partition. The BI data distribution wizard in the DBA Cockpit takes care of some of these tables, for example RSDMFACTAB and RSDMODSTAB. Maybe there are some additional ones.
Please list the names of the tables without partitioning key. If the error message does not contain them, you can get them with the following SQL statement:
select varchar(tabname,30)
from syscat.tables a
where tbspace='<your_tablespace>'
and not exists (select partkeyseq from syscat.columns b
where a.tabschema=b.tabschema and a.tabname=b.tabname
and b.partkeyseq > 0)
Brigitte

Is there a report to track the exception messages after a MRP run ?

We have a scenario at our client site where MRP run is not optimized to the fullest.
The planners are not trained on how to interpret those exception messages.
They are not trained on how to reschedule / expedite planned orders resulting from an MRP run.
Is there a report out in SAP that keeps track of
1) History of number of exception messages by type ( Expedite/Reschedule/Cancel)
2) History of number of exception messages that were acted on or ignored by the planner.
This is to create metrics on the usage of MRP exception reports by planners.
Appreciate your inputs..

Hi
The exception messages are dynamic and time dependant. You cannot have history of exception message.. If your user is feeling difficult to use standard MRP reports. Create a new report using a function module MD_STOCK_REQUIREMENTS_LIST_API
It gives all MRP data including exception messages.
Regards
Antony

BI-IP To track the planning changes after Data Locking

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for