Billing Error : Not processed

Dear Gurus,
I am facing a problem where I have created a Scheduling Agreement for a customer of 10 items and I have have maintained schedule lines for 4 Items and target quantities for the same. system is allowing me to deliver the 4 items but when I am trying to bill the items it is showing Not Processed and billing is not done.
Although if I maintain target quantity and schedule line for the rest 6 items, then only system is allowing me to bill the 4 items.
I checked the Copy control routine for LF=> F2  it is '003' and in it Message '069' is the reason for this error.
I think this Error is occuring due to Incompletion Log but am unable to solve it.
My requirment is I donot want to maintain the schedule lines & target quantity for the rest 6 items as i donot want to deliver the items immediatly, So I should be able to bill the first 4 materials, although I am creating a Scheduling agreement for all 10 items.
Thanks & Regards,
Arunava Sahana

Hi,
I tested this scenario in Sand Box.
There is an incompletion log for the Item in the Sales order  for the CUSTOMER  MATERIAL in the ORDER DATA.
Please check the Incompletion log in the sales order  and complete the data.
Hope it will resolve.
regards,
santosh

Similar Messages

  • RFQ Message Error " Not Processed"

    HI
    If the message was processed successfully, the status is set to '1' and if an error occurs, the status is set to '2'. Status '0' usually means that the processing program has not yet been started (if the message is to be processed manually, for example).
    In my RFQ the processing status is "0" means " Not Processed"
    In the msg status a "traingle button" is thr instead of the "Green Button"
    So that we can not able take print out in ME9A also not able see print preview thro ME9A
    How to make this processsed...
    Vijay

    check if the RFQ contain release strategy and alrady released for output.
    you can check the print preivew in ME4N.

  • Billing output not processed properly

    when i applied output with output type (RD00) for invoice it is not activated properly. screen become blank.
    kindly help me.

    Dear Kiran,
    Please look in these areas
    Maintanance of the condition record in VV32 transaction
    Check the printer related settings.
    Check the transmision medum and partner function in the condition record.
    Make sure that output program and smart form or script program have been assigned to the output type RD00..
    And also chek is there any routine assigned in the requirement colomun of your output procedure control data.
    The invoice document has been released to accounting or not.
    I hope this will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Billing document not cleared when processing Payment cards in Sales order

    Hi,
    I am having an issue with Payment card processing (credit card). We are using SAP R/3 4.7. When I use manual authorization, the status of billing document still shows "A" incomplete. The status shows authorization successful but not settled in billing document.The accounting document when billed shows not cleared.We are not using any interface for credit processing. The authorization check is done outside of the system manually. We are planning to use manual authorization for all such transactions. I am not sure if any specific config is to be done or am I misssing something.
    Any inputs in this regard would highly be appreciated.
    Thanks!
    Sanjay

    Hello Sanjay,
    Please also check to see if the field VBAP-ABFOR is filled for the line item (This is the Form of payment guarantee). Without this field filled the billing does not know that the item will be covered by payment cards.
    VBAP-ABGES (Guaranteed (factor between 0 and 1)) should also be filled with 1.
    I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Ian Kehoe

  • Could not process due to error: com.sap.aii.adapter.file.ftp.FTPEx: 550

    Hi Experts,
    We have many File to EDI scenarios wherein XI System pick up the XML and sent to customers via EDI. Recently we faced a problem so created a Back-up System (Production copy) and tested successfully. After sometime the messages were routed to this back-up system and when we notice it and then stopped the back-up system. All the messages that were routed to back-up system, we try to send the same messages from the actually Production system to our customers. Now the problem is XI system (Production system) is unable to pick these files and I check the communication monitoring and encountered the below error message.
    Could not process due to error: com.sap.aii.adapter.file.ftp.FTPEx: 550.550
    Can anyone let me know how to fix the issue or what needs to be done?
    Your help is highly appreciated.
    Regards
    Faisal

    Hi,
    It seems to be problem with permission of files. Please ask your basis to do following:
    1. Set the permissions to FTP User you are using as 777 rights(full access to read , write and delete)
    2.If you have access to PI server, try to telnet /connect to ftp using command prompt (open ftp .....) the FTP server form there, you should see the same error there , inform this to your network guys.
    3.Clear all the files places already in the ftp (take backup) and test afresh after permissions are set by basis team.
    Regards
    Aashish Sinha

  • Bill and Routing Interface concurrent program is not processing component

    Hi All,
    While running Bill and Routing Interface concurrent program,not processing the component item(Line Item) from bom_inventory_comps_interface,still it show process flag as 1. where as billing item(Header Item) is successfully done..i have tried with all the option by giving component sequence id and batch id still it is not processing component item..
    Is it recommendable to give bill sequence id and component sequence id in interface table using bom_inventory_component_s sequence..
    I will be very pleased if i listen from u guys... Plz help me in resolving this issue..
    My Header Insert Stmt..
    INSERT INTO apps.bom_bill_of_mtls_interface@system_link_visma
    (assembly_item_id, organization_id,
    alternate_bom_designator, last_update_date,
    last_updated_by, creation_date, created_by,
    revision, item_number, item_description,
    implementation_date, transaction_type,
    process_flag, assembly_type, batch_id
    VALUES (l_inv_item_id, l_org_id,
    NULL, SYSDATE,
    1318, SYSDATE, 1318,
    l_revision, l_item_num, l_description,
    SYSDATE, 'CREATE',
    1, 1, 10003535
    Component Insert stmt
    INSERT INTO apps.bom_inventory_comps_interface@system_link_visma
    (operation_seq_num, component_item_id,
    item_num, basis_type, component_quantity,
    auto_request_material, effectivity_date,
    disable_date, planning_factor,
    component_yield_factor,
    enforce_int_requirements,
    include_in_cost_rollup, wip_supply_type,
    supply_subinventory, supply_locator_id,
    check_atp, optional,
    mutually_exclusive_options,
    low_quantity, high_quantity,
    so_basis, shipping_allowed,
    include_on_ship_docs, required_to_ship,
    required_for_revenue, component_remarks,
    transaction_type, process_flag,
    assembly_item_id, component_item_number,
    batch_id,component_sequence_id
    VALUES (l_operation_seq, l_comp_item_id,
    cur2.item_sequence, l_basis, cur2.quantity,
    l_auto_request_mtls, cur2.from_date,
    cur2.TO_DATE, cur2.planning_factor,
    cur2.yield_factor,
    l_enforce_int_requirements,
    l_include_in_cost_rollup, l_supply_type,
    l_supply_subinventory, NULL,
    l_check_atp, l_optional,
    l_mutually_exclusive_options,
    cur2.minimum_quantity, cur2.maximum_quantity,
    l_sale_order_basis, l_shippable_flag,
    l_include_on_ship_docs, l_required_to_ship,
    l_required_for_revenue, cur2.comments,
    'CREATE', 1,
    l_inv_item_id, l_comp_item_num,
    10003535,apps.bom_inventory_components_s.nextval@system_link_visma
    For Subcomponent Insert Stmt
    INSERT INTO apps.bom_sub_comps_interface@system_link_visma
    (substitute_component_id,
    substitute_item_quantity,
    assembly_item_id, component_item_id,
    operation_seq_num, organization_id,
    substitute_comp_number,
    component_item_number,
    assembly_item_number,
    transaction_type, process_flag,
    enforce_int_requirements,
    effectivity_date,component_sequence_id,batch_id
    VALUES (l_sub_comp_item_id,
    cur3.quantity,
    l_inv_item_id, l_comp_item_id,
    cur2.operation_sequence, l_org_id,
    l_sub_comp_item_num,
    l_comp_item_num,
    l_item_num,
    'CREATE', 1,
    l_enforce_int_requirements,
    SYSDATE,apps.bom_inventory_components_s.currval@system_link_visma,10003535
    Thanks
    Raman Sharma
    Edited by: 929841 on May 4, 2012 12:28 AM
    Edited by: 929841 on May 4, 2012 2:58 AM

    You need to populate the organization_id or organization_code in bom_inventory_comps_interface.
    Here is a minimal insert
    INSERT INTO bom.bom_inventory_comps_interface
                (operation_seq_num, last_update_date, last_updated_by,
                 creation_date, created_by, process_flag, transaction_type,
                 bom_item_type,
                 effectivity_date, organization_code, assembly_item_number,
                 item_num, component_item_number, component_quantity
         VALUES (1                                                   -- op_seq_num
                 ,SYSDATE, 1433
                 ,SYSDATE, 1433, 1                                  -- process_flag
                 ,'Create',
                 4 -- bom_item_type 1 Model; 2 Option class; 3 Planning; 4 Standard; 5 Product family
                 ,SYSDATE - 1, 'PUB', 'SSGPARENT1'          -- assembly_item_number
                 ,10                                                     --item_num
                 , 'SSGCOMP1'                           -- component_item_number
                 , 10                                          --qty
                )Sandeep Gandhi

  • Error while processing SHPMNT in using big pack size 20 but not if 1

    Hi Experts,
    I am trying to to process status 64 SHPMNT IDocs via background job using program RBDAPP01.
    When I try to use Pack Size 20 (minimum preferred/suggested by SAP for better performance), I am encountering the status 54 error message "Processing terminated because not required or possible" when the SHPMNT IDocs are pointing to the same Shipment document.
    According to the error message:
    Processing of this IDoc is terminated because it is unnecessary or impossible. Reasons for termination may include:
    1. The IDoc appears twice in the IDoc packet you just processed
    2. The data included in the IDoc you entered does not provide unique identification of the application document concerned. For example, you enter the primary identification using field EXTI1. There could be two application documents with the same 'external identification 1'. In this case, there would be no way to tell which document should be changed.
    So, I got the idea of trying Pack Size 1 and it worked!
    So in conclusion, SAP (by default) does not allow processing of multiple SHPMNT IDocs referring to the same Shipment document in one packet.
    Is it possible to disable/turn off this check so that SHPMNT IDocs will be processed using Pack Size 20 even if they are referring to the same Shipment?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ruix

    Hi Ruix,
    We are running to exactly similar problem, Can you please share how you have resolved this issue?
    Many thanks in advance!!!!
    Regards,
    Kumar

  • Certificate issues Active Directory Certificate Services could not process request 3699 due to an error: The revocation function was unable to check revocation because the revocation server was offline. 0x80092013

    Hi,
    We have some problems with our Root CA. I can se a lot of failed requests. with the event id 22: in the logs. The description is: Active Directory Certificate Services could not process request 3686 due to an error: The revocation function was unable to
    check revocation because the revocation server was offline. 0x80092013 (-2146885613).  The request was for CN=xxxxx.ourdomain.com.  Additional information: Error Verifying Request Signature or Signing Certificate
    A couple of months ago we decomissioned one of our old 2003 DCs and it looks like this server might have had something to do with the CA structure but I am not sure whether this was in use or not since I could find the role but I wasn't able to see any existing
    configuration.
    Let's say that this server was previously responsible for the certificates and was the server that should have revoked the old certs, what can I do know to try and correct the problem?
    Thank you for your help
    //Cris

    hello,
    let me recap first:
    you see these errors on a ROOT CA. so it seems like the ROOT CA is also operating as an ISSUING CA. Some clients try to issue a new certificate from the ROOT CA and this fails with your error mentioned.
    do you say that you had a PREVIOUS CA which you decomissioned, and you now have a brand NEW CA, that was built as a clean install? When you decommissioned the PREVIOUS CA, that was your design decision to don't bother with the current certificates that it
    issued and which are still valid, right?
    The error says, that the REQUEST signature cannot be validated. REQUESTs are signed either by itself (self-signed) or if they are renewal requests, they would be signed with the previous certificate which the client tries to renew. The self-signed REQUESTs
    do not contain CRL paths at all.
    So this implies to me as these requests that are failing are renewal requests. Renewal requests would contain CRL paths of the previous certificates that are nearing their expiration.
    As there are many such REQUEST and failures, it probably means that the clients use AUTOENROLLMENT, which tries to renew their current, but shortly expiring, certificates during (by default) their last 6 weeks of lifetime.
    As you decommissioned your PREVIOUS CA, it does not issue CRL anymore and the current certificates cannot be checked for validity.
    Thus, if the renewal tries to renew them by using the NEW CA, your NEW CA cannot validate CRL of the PREVIOUS CA and will not issue new certificates.
    But it would not issue new certificates anyway even if it was able to verify the PREVIOUS CA's CRL, as it seems your NEW CA is completely brand new, without being restored from the PREVIOUS CA's database. Right?
    So simply don't bother :-) As long as it was your design to decommission the PREVIOUS CA without bothering with its already issued certificates.
    The current certificates which autoenrollment tries to renew cannot be checked for validity. They will also slowly expire over the next 6 weeks or so. After that, autoenrollment will ask your NEW CA to issue a brand new certificate without trying to renew.
    Just a clean self-signed REQUEST.
    That will succeed.
    You can also verify this by trying to issue a certificate on an affected machine manually from Certificates MMC.
    ondrej.

  • Script Alert: "Sorry I could not process the following files" (Error Message using Image Processor)

    I'm a seasoned Photoshop/Bridge CS5 user who recently upgraded to CS6.  In Bridge I just ran my first Image Processor batch, trying to convert a set of RAW .NEF files to .PSD files with a basic editing action I created applied to them.  Photoshop CS6 opens the files from Bridge and applies the actions, but then I get the "Script alert" error message "Sorry I could not process the following files" and a list of all of the files in the batch I was trying to run the script on.  The files all remain open and are saved on my hard drive in a folder created by the Image Processor script, but do not close unless I manually close them.  I never had this problem in CS5 where the image processor would apply the desired actions to the batch of photos one at a time, then save and close.  Thoughts on how I can fix this bug?

    Hey Jeff--
    No specific action steps to make the image safe - no flattening, etc. Had problems narrowing down the specific action step causing the problem. So I ran the Image Processor script in the ExtendScript ToolKit and debugged in. (I'm using the version that shipped with CS4.)
    Turns out what was happening is that the app.activeDocument.close() command on line 1490 was never getting called, because the this.SaveFile() above it was throwing an exception. More debugging got me to the problem - SaveFile() tries to restore the history state after making a doc safe for saving as a JPEG. This causes an exception. So I commented out line 1571:
    // app.activeDocument.ativeHistoryState = historyState;
    The script runs just fine after this. I commented out the close to see what history states got added to the doc, but no new states are recorded, so commenting out the restore line should not cause any problems.
    Of course, my solution does not solve the problem and I may need to comment out all the saveFile() lines that does this. Not sure why some actions have this problem and others don't. The actions I am running have about 25 steps. Perhaps PS is not catching up quick enough. I added a $.sleep(2500) after the restore history but that didn't help.
    So, not sure where this gets us. I will check about posting an action set with just one of the actions that cause the problem. But I may also have our customer comment out that line of the Image Processor script.
    Hope this helps. May post more next week.

  • HT4623 I can not get connected to App Store , download or update any apps,  EVEN I DID RESET ALL SETTING , STILL I RECIEVE A MESSAGE says: YOUR REQUEST IS NOT PROCESSED ,ERROR COD: 109 !! WHAT DOSE IT MEAN? HOW CAN I SOLVE THE PROBLEM??

    I can not get connected to AppStore , DOWNLOAD OR UPDATE ANY OF MY APPS , WHEN I GO FOR INSTALLING , THE MESSAGE SAYS: YOIR REQUEST IS NOT PROCESSED ,  ERROR CODE, 1009!!! HOW CAN I SOLVE THIS PROBLEM??

    Try contacting the iTunes support staff, they do the app store also, at:  http://www.apple.com/emea/support/itunes/contact.html

  • Error in process -in SRM not able to generate a PO in R/3

    Hi Experts,
    Can anyone tell me hwo to resolve this problem?
    This is classic scenario, version 4.0
    The user has raised a shopping cart without assigning vendor to it, so it has gone error in process as we dont have the Purchase requistion scenario.
    I have now assigned a vendor in the shopping cart by going to the sources of supply tab and giving my vendor in the preferred vendor and then ordered the shopping cart still I the approval and follow on documents are in errors and not able to generate an order
    Please suggets some FM or some solution thru which I can generate an order, I have used the following but not able to generate an order .
    I tried by BBP_PD_SC_RESUBMIT -FM
    BBP_REQREQ_TRANSFER - FM.
    BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER_INTERNAL.
    but the problem is not yet resolved. Ours in N-step approval badi.
    Please suggest.
    Regards
    Srujank

    Hi Daniel,
    Thanks for your reply !!!
    I m sorry , I have already tried that actually, but didnt not work. Actually the shopping cart is already approved  for that I have made changes and re-submitted .
    the workflow is WS14000133, and N-step approval with Badi implementation.
    so i think this is not allowing me to change.
    Regards
    Srujank

  • PO error in Process-Order Unit PU not convertible into unit lot of req

    Hi ALL,
    SRM 5.0 SP13 ECS
    Service based req with order unit LOT was pushed to SRM . SC got approved in SRM with order unit LOT, PO got approved with order unit LOT and now the PO is in error in process state. I looked up RZ20 to find the message "Order unit PU not covertible into unit Lot of req. We are using material groups and not material masters.
    Any idea what is causing this error? order unit seems to be the same, right though the scenario, It was never tried to change at any point of time in the cycle
    Krishna

    krishna
    update here your findings.it helps others too when they are in trouble.
    Muthu

  • Error: The resource did not process correctly. How do I get rid of it?

    I continue to receive an error everytime I log in to my college student email. The error says The resource did not process correctly. I desperately need help with this problem the error shows this as well java.lang.NullPointerException

    Is that with Angel LMS from Blackboard?
    That software doesn't seem to work with Firefox 7.
    *http://helpdesk.oneonta.edu/xoops/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=167

  • SSIS-Execute Process task Error _File/Process "\\Servername\Foldername\batfile.bat" is not in path

    Hi Sir,
    I have designed the SSIS Package in 2012 Version. and i have deployed into the Integration Server,using Project Deployment Model.
    In the SSIS Pacakge we are calling the batch file using Execute Process task.
    when i am Executing the SSIS pacakge using Visual Studio(Sql Server Data tools) which is working fine.
    When i Execute the Pacakge uisng Sql server Management Studio,after the Deployment i am getting the below Error message.
    ExecProcess task:Error: File/Process "\\Servername\Foldername\batfile.bat" is not in path.
    Thanks for your time.
    Regards
    Prasad

    Hi Prasad,
    When you say executing the package in SSMS, I think you right click on the package and execute it manually rather than execute it through SQL Server Agent job, right? How did you execute the package from the SSMS on DEV server? Have your also deployed the
    SSIS project to the SSISDB catalog on DEV server or you used SSMS tool on DEV to connect to the QA server to execute the package?
    When you log into the Database Engine instance, make sure the credentials you used has access on the shared folder which hosts the .bat file. Besides, I think the issue may be caused by the Windows UAC feature which may lower the permissions level of an
    administrator to a standard user. So, I suggest that you run the SSMS as administrator to see if it works.
    Regards,
    Mike Yin
    TechNet Community Support

  • Sub Agreement XML import error:  XML import could not process field: CONTRACT_UNIQUE_DOC_NAME

    Hi All,
    I am importing Sub Agreement in XML format and getting below error.
    XML import could not process field: CONTRACT_UNIQUE_DOC_NAME
    unsupported null bind parameter no. 0
    Below is the XML.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <sapesourcing xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="Contracts.xsd" defaultlanguage="" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
      <objects>
        <object classname="contracts.Agreement">
    <fields> 
                                    <CONTRACT_UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>P-XXXX-00001</CONTRACT_UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>
                                    <DISPLAY_NAME>Testing Agreement Name 1 </DISPLAY_NAME>
                                    <CALC_METHOD>UNIT_PRICE_ENTERED</CALC_METHOD>
                                    <UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>S0002510</UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>
                                    <STATUS>In Process</STATUS>
                                    <COMPANY>TEST</COMPANY>
                                    <LOCATION>Location_114</LOCATION>
                      </fields>
        </object>
      </objects>
    </sapesourcing>
    If anyone is successful in importing Sub Agreement in XML format?  also please validate the above xml structure?
    Note: I am able to load  Sub Agreement using CSV. But in our scenario data comes in XML format.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sai

    Hi Gary,
    I am able to load below objects in XML format without any issues. And I am using Scheduled Task of type “Data Import Monitor” to load them.
    1)  Project (1100)
    2)  Master Agreement (1004)
    3) Extension Collections for Project
    4) Extension Collections for Master Agreement
    1) Working XML Structure for Project(1100) .
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <sapesourcing xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="Projects.xsd" defaultlanguage="" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
      <objects>
        <object classname="projects.projects">
          <fields>
    <UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>S0004392</UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>
      <DISPLAY_NAME>Test Project</DISPLAY_NAME>
    2) Working XML Structure for Master Agreement (1004) object.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <sapesourcing xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="Contracts.xsd" defaultlanguage="" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <objects>
    <object classname="contracts.Contract">
    <fields>
    <UNIQUE_DOC_NAME> 00215944</UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>
    <DISPLAY_NAME>TEST MA</DISPLAY_NAME>
    <DOCUMENT_DESCRIPTION>Contract Desc</DOCUMENT_DESCRIPTION>
    3) Working XML Structure for Extension Collections for Project(1100).
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <sapesourcing xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="Projects.xsd" defaultlanguage="" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <objects>
    <object classname="projects.projects">
    <fields>
    <UNIQUE_DOC_NAME> S0004392</UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>
    </fields>
    <collections>
    <Z_DETAILS replace="true">
    <object classname="extension_collections">
    <fields>
    <NAME>Sai</NAME>
    <EMAIL>[email protected]</EMAIL>
    </fields>
    </object>
    <object classname="extension_collections">
    <fields>
    <NAME>Krishna</NAME>
    <EMAIL>[email protected]</EMAIL>
    </fields>
    </object>
    </ Z_DETAILS >
    </collections>
    </object>
    </objects>
    </sapesourcing>
    4) Working XML Structure for Extension Collections for Master Agreement (1004).
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <sapesourcing xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="Contracts.xsd" defaultlanguage="" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <objects>
    <object classname="contracts.Contract">
    <fields>
    <UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>00215944</UNIQUE_DOC_NAME>
    </fields>
    <collections>
    <ZLINKS replace="true">
    <object classname="extension_collections">
    <fields>
    <LINK_NAME>SAP</ LINK_NAME>
    < LINK_URL> http://www.sap.com/index.html </ LINK_URL >
    </fields>
    </object>
    <object classname="extension_collections">
    <fields>
    <LINK_NAME>SCN Sourcing</ LINK_NAME>
    < LINK_URL>http://scn.sap.com/community/sourcing</ LINK_URL >
    </fields>
    </object>
    </ ZLINKS >
    </collections>
    </object>
    </objects>
    </sapesourcing>
    Could you please help me with the right XML Structure for Agreement( 1003)?
    Regards,
    Sai

Maybe you are looking for