Bitrate analyzer

Hi,
Do you know if a FLF bitrate analyzer exists ?
I'm asking, because I'm facing a strange behavious : when
encoding a video at 300 kbps rate (CBR), and broadcasting the same
video at 300 kbps (+ 1 sec buffer), there should be no freeze
during the broadcast.
This is theory. But in practise, there are some freezes on
high motion scenes.
Is there any explanation ?
Xris

There were reports that Compressor sometimes would spike past what was set, though with your AC3 settings, even with two audio tracks, and the rates you selected it would seem to be safe
This app is suppossed to read spikes
http://www.videohelp.com/tools/MacDVDBitrateParanoia
But it has given me strange results
Also digiami.com (good software but $$$) also reads rates
Is your second audio file also an aif? If you remove it does the disk then build without error? You can try deleting MPEG/PAR files and/or repair permissions or delete prefs to see if it helps

Similar Messages

Encore CS5 insists on transcoding .m4v

Kind of stuck here.
Trying to author a Blu-ray and I encoded a large video file out of Premiere CS5 with Media Encoder CS5 using H.264 Blu-ray.
I always do this and then bring the clips into Encore and it never tries to transcode them but for this particular project it insists on transcoding and the transcoded file packs in another 4GB or so.
Here are my encoding settings:
Format: H.264 Blu-ray
Codec: Main Concept H.264 Video
TV Standard: Automatic
Frame dimensions: 1440x1080
Frame rate: Automatic
Field Order: Automatic
Pixel Aspect Ratio: Automatic
Profile: Main
Level: 4.1
Bitrate Encoding: VBR, 2 Pass
Bitrate Level: Custom
Target: 25Mbps
Maximum: 30Mbps
I don't get why Encore won't build without transcoding first. The initial encode took 20 hours and I don't want to wait for Encore to transcode the video again nor do I want the extra 4GB.
Any ideas as to what happened with my encode or is it a problem with Encore?
Thanks.

Pyramid Pyro wrote:
Agreed. If this is pre-audio then my idea is not correct.
My guess is that there is still a bit rate issue even if the file settings are correct. A bitrate analyzer may help, but that sounds like a lot of trouble (determining if the large/master file somehow clips just of the 30 mark and your short sample does not).
I like Ann's idea best so far
Best of luck,
Erik
Yeah, even if I change the project settings to 40.0Mbps and reimport the clip Encore still wants to transcode.
At this point I'm thinking something went wrong with the encode and I should just re-encode and try again.
Unless someone has another idea, I'll post my results when the encode is complete.

Studio 12.1 Performace Analyzer 7.7 problem, with 'er_print' utility.

I am having a minor but nagging problem with a regression in the er_print utility of the Sun Performance Analyzer suite bundled in Studio 12. is there maybe a patch available or in the works?
I have not had any success in finding a resolution by searching the open literature
The issue is that the callers-callees listing only dumps functions in alphabetical order, ignoring the sort order specified by sort. This is a regression from the Performance Analyzer (7.4) behavior from Sun Studio 10. We only recently jumped to studio 12.1.
This functionality is documented here: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-0304/afaid?a=view (as well as many other references). To quote:
callers-callees
Print the callers-callees panel for each of the functions, in the order specified by the function sort metric (sort)."
I use a script input to er_print that in the past analyzed the top N functions sorted on inclusive thread time. Now I have to be sure to dump ALL functions and need a third-party search tool to find that information in the resulting report.
Has anyone heard of this problem or are there Performance Analyzer patch(es) available. I saw some for 7.6 and another for unspecified but have not seen this problem in patch notices.
Thanks.
Regards,
Steve

Nik, thanks for taking a look. We can't go to 12.2 because we're a software developer and we'll lose our binary compatibility with the release we've been building for the last few months. I'm a systems guy and will paste in a developer's example below.
Note Marc's url shows a 12.1 Performance Analyzer patch 142369-01 we have not yet installed. The patch notice description doesn't show much. I'll pass on patch info to remote user/developer.
Developer example:
I use a script input to er_print that in the past analyzed the top N functions sorted on inclusive thread time. Now I have to be sure to dump ALL functions and need a third-party search tool to find that information in the resulting report.
Heres a shortened (only 4) example of the behavior Im seeing the focus of the functions in callers-callees are NOT those of the functions determined by the sort metric.
= = = =
sysun046% er_print /scratch/test.4.er
/scratch/test.4.er: Experiment has warnings, see header for details
(/opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/../prod/bin/sparcv9/er_print) sort i.total
Current Sort Metric: Inclusive Total Thread Time ( i.total )
(/opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/../prod/bin/sparcv9/er_print) cmetrics a.total:e.user:i.user:e.total:i.total
Current caller-callee metrics: a.total:e.user:i.user:e.total:i.total:name
Current caller-callee sort metric: Attributed Total Thread Time ( a.total )
(/opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/../prod/bin/sparcv9/er_print) limit 4
(/opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/../prod/bin/sparcv9/er_print) sample_select 22-53
Exp Sel Total
=== ===== =====
1 22-53 57
(/opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/../prod/bin/sparcv9/er_print) functions
Functions sorted by metric: Inclusive Total Thread Time
Excl. Incl. Incl. Total Name
User CPU User CPU Thread
sec. sec. sec.
26.015 26.015 113.530 <Total>
0. 26.015 113.530 ACE_Task_Base::svc_run(void*)
0. 26.015 113.530 ACE_Thread_Adapter::invoke()
0. 26.015 113.530 ORB_Task::svc()
(/opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/../prod/bin/sparcv9/er_print) callers-callees
Functions sorted by metric: Inclusive Total Thread Time
Callers and callees sorted by metric: Attributed Total Thread Time
Attr. Total Excl. Incl. Excl. Total Incl. Total Name
Thread User CPU User CPU Thread Thread
sec. sec. sec. sec. sec.
113.530 26.015 26.015 113.530 113.530 *<Total>
113.530 0. 26.015 0. 113.530 lwpstart
Attr. Total Excl. Incl. Excl. Total Incl. Total Name
Thread User CPU User CPU Thread Thread
sec. sec. sec. sec. sec.
0.010 0. 0.010 0. 0.010 ACE_Message_Block::clone(unsigned long)const
0. 0. 0.010 0. 0.010 *ACE_Data_Block::clone(unsigned long)const
0.010 0.398 0.398 0.398 0.398 memcpy
Attr. Total Excl. Incl. Excl. Total Incl. Total Name
Thread User CPU User CPU Thread Thread
sec. sec. sec. sec. sec.
0.001 0. 0.003 0. 0.011 ACE_Select_Reactor_T<ACE_Select_Reactor_Token_T<ACE_Token> >::resume_handler(int)
0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 *ACE_Guard<ACE_Select_Reactor_Token_T<ACE_Token> >::release()
Attr. Total Excl. Incl. Excl. Total Incl. Total Name
Thread User CPU User CPU Thread Thread
sec. sec. sec. sec. sec.
0.010 0. 0.010 0. 0.010 TAO_Synch_Queued_Message::clone(ACE_Allocator*)
0. 0. 0.010 0. 0.010 *ACE_Message_Block::clone(unsigned long)const
0.010 0. 0.010 0. 0.010 ACE_Data_Block::clone(unsigned long)const
= = = = =
Nik, thanks for taking a look.
Steve

I wonder to know what is the enterprise solution for windows and application event log management and analyzer

Hi
I wonder to know what is the enterprise solution for windows and application event log management and analyzer.
I have recently research and find two application that seems to be profession ,1-manageengine eventlog analyzer, 2- Solarwinds LEM(Solarwind Log & Event Manager).
I Want to know the point of view of Microsoft expert and give me their experience and solutions.
thanks in advance.

Consider MS System Center 2012.
Rgds

Error when starting Bex analyzer

Hi All!
We have a world wide BW-SEM application. In one country they get the following error message when starting Bex analyzer:
<install error> Missing ActiveX component: Business Explorer Global Services
Does anyone have a hint on what to do?
Thanks for your help!
Best Regards
Pontus

hi
try to check with SAPBEXC.xla
and take a look oss note 585643
may need to manual register .dll with regsvr32
Do an Installation check of the BEx Analyzer as follows:
In the bex analyzer menu, Business explorer -> Installation Check -> Once the excel sheet opens, press the start button to start the check. Check the entries in red to see any missing/old ocx, dlls.

Analyzer 6.1.1 Not showing all data in 800x600 PC screen settings

I have a user not able to see the whole Analyzer view due to their client pc settings for screen size being set at 800x600. I created the Anazler views with my setting at 1024x768. I need the Analyzer server to make all of the views to be 100% instead of using pixels.

Hi man. Put de border and the proprierts to ajust fit screen. So, when the user open in 800x600, the report will ajust automaticaly in the screen.Regards,Gustavo Santade

Satatus of Data in Bex Analyzer

Hello ,
is it possible to hide "status of data" in bex analyzer ? I have read some documents but all are say it is only possible with Web Designer.
I have a query from a Multiprovider and I don't wnt to show Status of data information in the report .
thank you ,
blue

You can goto design mode in the workbook and delete the text element which is showing status of data, come out of design mode and save the workbook.
Edited by: Pravender on May 18, 2010 2:19 PM

SAP BPC MS 7.5 with Extended Analytic Analyzer and EPM connector

Hi experts,
I need your inputs regarding Extended Analytic Analyzer add ins.
I installed the SAP Business Object Extended Analytic Analyzer hoping to integrate the Xcelsius in SAP BPC MS 7.5
I am following the HTG to integrate but got lost.
In EPM connector steps, I cannot find the option from OPERATION TYPE: Retrieve data using Analyzer Report.
The only options available under operation type are
EPM Report
Retrieve Environments
Retrieve Models
Retrieve Dimensions
Retrieve Dimension Members
Input Data
Retrieve Business Process Flows
Retrieve Context
Retrieve Members Property Values
RetrieveText From Library
It doesn't include the option Retrieve data using Analyzer Report.
Im wondering if there are different version of the epm connector? Was my EPM connector differs from the HTG?
And also in Excel under Extended Analytic Analyzer, the function =GETREPORTDEFINITION() is missing
Please help me on this guys..
Thanks in advance.
yajepe

It seems a very good oportunity to use FIM.
FIM was designed especially for exchange data betweeen different SAP product.
FIM will provide an easy way to do the conversion using wizards and also will assure you about data inetgrity and quality.
This will be the way forward but more details has to be define during the implementation.
I hope this will help you.
Kind Regards
Sorin Radulescu

"analyze index" vs "rebuild index"

Hi,
I don't undestand the difference between "analyze index" and "rebuild index".
I have a table where I do a lot of "insert" and "update" and "query", What is the best thing to do ??
thanks
Giordano

When you use dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats package with cascade=>true option, you are also collecting stats for the indexes, no need to collects stats separately using dbms_stats.gather_index_stats.Of course, but I refered to the rebuild index question. Therefore I only mentioned the GATHER_INDEX_STATS.
Auto_sample_size has many problems/bugs in 9iOk didn't know that - I'm using 10gR2.
But this discussion made me curious. So I tried something (10gR2):
CREATE TABLE BIG NOLOGGING AS
WITH GEN AS (
SELECT ROWNUM ID FROM ALL_OBJECTS WHERE ROWNUM <=10000)
SELECT V1.ID,RPAD('A',10) C FROM GEN V1,GEN V2
WHERE ROWNUM <=10000000;
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM BIG;
COUNT(*)
10000000
So I had a Table containing 10 Million rows. Now I indexed ID:
CREATE INDEX BIG_IDX ON BIG(ID)
I tested two different methods:
1.) GATHER_TABLE_STATS with estimate 10%
EXEC DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS(TABNAME=>'BIG',OWNNAME=>'DIMITRI',CASCADE=>TRUE,ESTIMATE_PERCENT=>10);
It took about 6 seconds (I only set timing on in sqlplus, no 10046 trace) Now I checked the estimated values:
SELECT NUM_ROWS,SAMPLE_SIZE,ABS(10000000-NUM_ROWS)/100000 VARIANCE,'TABLE' OBJECT FROM USER_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME='BIG'
UNION ALL
SELECT NUM_ROWS,SAMPLE_SIZE,ABS(10000000-NUM_ROWS)/100000 VARIANCE,'INDEX' OBJECT FROM USER_INDEXES WHERE INDEX_NAME='BIG_IDX';
NUM_ROWS SAMPLE_SIZE VARIANCE OBJEC
9985220 998522 ,1478 TABLE
9996210 999621 ,0379 INDEX
2.) GATHER_TABLE_STATS with DBMS_STATS.AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE
EXEC DBMS_STATS.DELETE_TABLE_STATS(OWNNAME=>'DIMITRI',TABNAME=>'BIG');
EXEC DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS(TABNAME=>'BIG',OWNNAME=>'DIMITRI',CASCADE=>TRUE,ESTIMATE_PERCENT=>DBMS_STATS.AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE);
It took about 1,5 seconds. Now the results:
NUM_ROWS SAMPLE_SIZE VARIANCE OBJEC
9826851 4715 1,73149 TABLE
10262432 561326 2,62432 INDEX
The estimate 10% was more exact - also a 1,7 and 2,6 percent variance is still ok. It's also very interesting, that using AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE
causes oracle to execute a estimate 5% for the index and a estimate 0.5 for the table.
I tried again with a table containing only 1 Million records and oracle did an estimate with 100% for the index.
So for me I will continue using AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE. Its very flexible, fast and accurate.
Dim
PS: Is there a way to format code like one can do in HTML using <code> or <pre>?

Rebuild index vs Analyze index

Hi All,
I am realy confused about rebuilding index versus Analyzing index.
Could anyone plz help me out what is the diffrence between them.
How to Perform analyze of indexes and Rebuld of Indexes for both Oracle 9i and 10g databases.
Thanks a lot

CKPT wrote:
You can see the posts of experts by jonathan
I am realy confused about rebuilding index versus Analyzing index. tell us you are getting confused why we need to ananlyze before reubild index? if so
if index analyzed the whole statistics of index will be gathered.... then you can check what is the hieght of the index.. according to the height of the index you need to take step is index need to be really rebuild or not...
lets see furhter posts from experts if not clear..Thanks OK, so you determine the height of an index is (say) 4. What then ? If you decide to rebuild the index and the index remains at a height of 4, what now ? Was it really worth doing and do you rebuild it again as the index height is still 4 and still within your index rebuild criteria ? At what point do you decide that rebuilding the index just because it has a height of 4 is a total waste of time in this case ?
OK, so you determine the index only has a height of (say) 3, does that mean you don't rebuild the index ? But what if by rebuilding the index, the index now reduces to a height of just 1 ? Perhaps not rebuilding the index even though it has just a height of 3 and doesn't currently meet your index rebuild criteria is totally the wrong thing to do and a rebuild would result in a significantly leaner and more efficient index structure ?
So what if it's pointless rebuilding an index with a height of 4 but another index with a height of 3 is a perfect candidate to be rebuilt ?
Perhaps knowing just the height of an index leaves one totally clueless after all as to whether the index might benefit from an index rebuild ...
Cheers
Richard Foote
http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/

Decimal Point in Analyzer 6.2.1

Hi all,Is it possible to set on server Analyzer 6.2.1 the decimal symbol and digit grouping symbol for the format of numbers ?When it has to be done the export to Excel, the number format are taken from Analyzer server. If the Regional Options from the client part for decimal symbol and digit grouping symbol are different from Analyzer server, the export in Excel it does not work properly. Is possible to set the export to Excel to take the number settings from the client part ?

As far as I know this shouldn't be the case. The Java applet should take local client settings period and not be affected by how the server is set. You should ensure that you have the 'international' version of the Sun Java Plugin installed and not the UK/US version. Hope this helps.Paul Armitage.Analitica Ltd.www.analitica.co.uk

Long time to start Java Web Client (Analyzer 6.2.1)??

Does anyone know why Analyzer(6.2.1) takes a long time to start Java Web Client. Sometime it's even take more than 5 minutes. I think it is the Java Plug-in starting on the client computer. Any solution?

The key to Analyzer 6.2.1 running correctly is the version of Sun Java Plugin. The ideal version (most optimal) is 1.3.0_02.Secondary to this if Analyzer performs OK once you are logged in then it could be down to the speed of your connection. The applet compiles at runtime (unlike Analyzer 5 which was a one time download). The delay in getting to the login screen could be this download.Hope this helps.Paul ArmitageAnalitica Ltd.www.analitica.co.uk

Statpack analyzing of 9i database.

hi Expertise
Please help me for sorting the statpack report of my production DB in 9i. Also advise some recommendation after analyzing my statpack view.
Elapsed:     3.75 (min)     225 (sec)
DB Time:     7.84 (min)     470.65 (sec)
Cache:     10,016 MB
Block Size:     8,192 bytes
Transactions:     2.01 per second
Performance Summary
Physical Reads:     15,666/sec          MB per second:     122.39 MB/sec
Physical Writes:     22/sec          MB per second:     0.17 MB/sec
Single-block Reads:     1,412.69/sec          Avg wait:     0.03 ms
Multi-block Reads:     1,916.26/sec          Avg wait:     0.05 ms
Tablespace Reads:     3,346/sec          Writes:     22/sec
Top 5 Events
Event     Percentage of Total Timed Events
CPU time     79.89%
PX Deq: Execute Reply     6.38%
db file scattered read     4.32%
SQL*Net more data from dblink     4.29%
db file sequential read     2.00%
Tablespace I/O Stats
Tablespace     Read/s     Av Rd(ms)     Blks/Rd     Writes/s     Read%     % Total IO
TS_CCPS     3,117      0     2.5      0      100%     92.5%
TS_OTHERS     204      0.2     26.2      1      99%     6.09%
TS_AC_POSTED03     19      1.9     127      2      89%     0.63%
Load Profile
Logical reads:     42,976/s          Parses:     39.41/s
Physical reads:     15,666/s          Hard parses:     5.43/s
Physical writes:     22/s          Transactions:     2.01/s
Rollback per transaction:     0%          Buffer Nowait:     100%
4 Recommendations:
Your database has relatively high logical I/O at 42,976 reads per second. Logical Reads includes data block reads from both memory and disk. High LIO is sometimes associated with high CPU activity. CPU bottlenecks occur when the CPU run queue exceeds the number of CPUs on the database server, and this can be seen by looking at the "r" column in the vmstat UNIX/Linux utility or within the Windows performance manager. Consider tuning your application to reduce unnecessary data buffer touches (SQL Tuning or PL/SQL bulking), using faster CPUs or adding more CPUs to your system.
You are performing more than 15,666 disk reads per second. High disk latency can be caused by too-few physical disk spindles. Compare your read times across multiple datafiles to see which datafiles are slower than others. Disk read times may be improved if contention is reduced on the datafile, even though read times may be high due to the file residing on a slow disk. You should identify whether the SQL accessing the file can be tuned, as well as the underlying characteristics of the hardware devices.
Check your average disk read speed later in this report and ensure that it is under 7ms. Assuming that the SQL is optimized, the only remaining solutions are the addition of RAM for the data buffers or a switch to solid state disks. Give careful consideration these tablespaces with high read I/O: TS_CCPS, TS_OTHERS, TS_AC_POSTED03, TS_RATING, TS_GP.
You have more than 1,222 unique SQL statements entering your shared pool, with the resulting overhead of continuous RAM allocation and freeing within the shared pool. A hard parse is expensive because each incoming SQL statement must be re-loaded into the shared pool; with the associated overhead involved in shared pool RAM allocation and memory management. Once loaded, the SQL must then be completely re-checked for syntax & semantics and an executable generated. Excessive hard parsing can occur when your shared_pool_size is too small (and reentrant SQL is paged out) or when you have non-reusable SQL statements without host variables. See the cursor_sharing parameter for an easy way to make SQL reentrant and remember that you should always use host variables in you SQL so that they can be reentrant.
Instance Efficiency
Buffer Hit:     69.13%          In-memory Sort:     100%
Library Hit:     96.4%          Latch Hit:     99.99%
Memory Usage:     95.04%          Memory for SQL:     64.19%
2 Recommendations:
Your Buffer Hit ratio is 69.13%. The buffer hit ratio measures the probability that a data block will be in the buffer cache upon a re-read of the data block. If your database has a large number of frequently referenced table rows (a large working set), then investigate increasing your db_cache_size. For specific recommendations, see the output from the data buffer cache advisory utility (using the v$db_cache_advice utility). Also, a low buffer hit ratio is normal for applications that do not frequently re-read the same data blocks. Moving to SSD will alleviate the need for a large data buffer cache.
Your shared pool maybe filled with non-reusable SQL with 95.04% memory usage. The Oracle shared poolcontains Oracle´s library cache, which is responsible for collecting, parsing, interpreting, and executing all of the SQL statements that go against the Oracle database. You can check the dba_hist_librarycache table in Oracle10g to see your historical library cache RAM usage.
SQL Statistics
Click here to see all SQL data
Wait Events
Event     Waits     Wait Time (s)     Avg Wait (ms)     Waits/txn
PX Deq: Execute Reply     137     30     219     0.3
db file scattered read     431,159     20     0     951.8
SQL*Net more data from dblin     51,140     20     0     112.9
db file sequential read     317,856     9     0     701.7
io done     6,842     5     1     15.1
db file parallel read     21     1     52     0.0
local write wait     250     1     4     0.6
db file parallel write     825     1     1     1.8
SQL*Net message from dblink     208     1     3     0.5
log file parallel write     2,854     1     0     6.3
0 Recommendations:
Instance Activity Stats
Statistic     Total     per Second     per Trans
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client     87,889     390.6     194.0
consistent gets     10,141,287     45,072.4     22,387.0
consistent gets - examination     884,579     3,931.5     1,952.7
db block changes     100,342     446.0     221.5
execute count     18,913     84.1     41.8
parse count (hard)     1,222     5.4     2.7
parse count (total)     8,868     39.4     19.6
physical reads     3,525,003     15,666.7     7,781.5
physical reads direct     539,879     2,399.5     1,191.8
physical writes     5,132     22.8     11.3
physical writes direct     29     0.1     0.1
redo writes     1,598     7.1     3.5
session cursor cache hits     4,378     19.5     9.7
sorts (disk)     0     0.0     0.0
sorts (memory)     4,988     22.2     11.0
table fetch continued row     310     1.4     0.7
table scans (long tables)     82     0.4     0.2
table scans (short tables)     18,369     81.6     40.6
workarea executions - onepass     0     0.0     0.0
5 Recommendations:
You have high network activity with 390.6 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client per second, which is a high amount of traffic. Review your application to reduce the number of calls to Oracle by encapsulating data requests into larger pieces (i.e. make a single SQL request to populate all online screen items). In addition, check your application to see if it might benefit from bulk collection by using PL/SQL "forall" or "bulk collect" operators.
You have 3,931.5 consistent gets examination per second. "Consistent gets - examination" is different than regular consistent gets. It is used to read undo blocks for consistent read purposes, but also for the first part of an index read and hash cluster I/O. To reduce logical I/O, you may consider moving your indexes to a large blocksize tablespace. Because index splitting and spawning are controlled at the block level, a larger blocksize will result in a flatter index tree structure.
You have high update activity with 446.0 db block changes per second. The DB block changes are a rough indication of total database work. This statistic indicates (on a per-transaction level) the rate at which buffers are being dirtied and you may want to optimize your database writer (DBWR) process. You can determine which sessions and SQL statements have the highest db block changes by querying the v$session and v$sessatst views.
You have high disk reads with 15,666.7 per second. Reduce disk reads by increasing your data buffer size or speed up your disk read speed by moving to SSD storage. You can monitor your physical disk reads by hour of the day using AWR to see when the database has the highest disk activity.
You have high small table full-table scans, at 81.6 per second. Verify that your KEEP pool is sized properly to cache frequently referenced tables and indexes. Moving frequently-referenced tables and indexes to SSD or theWriteAccelerator will significantly increase the speed of small-table full-table scans.
Buffer Pool Advisory
Current:     3,599,469,418 disk reads
Optimized:     1,207,668,233 disk reads
Improvement:     66.45% fewer
The Oracle buffer cache advisory utility indicates 3,599,469,418 disk reads during the sample interval. Oracle estimates that doubling the data buffer size (by increasing db_cache_size) will reduce disk reads to 1,207,668,233, a 66.45% decrease.
Init.ora Parameters
Parameter     Value
cursor_sharing     similar
db_block_size     8,192
db_cache_size     8GB
db_file_multiblock_read_count     32
db_keep_cache_size     1GB
hash_join_enabled     true
log_archive_start     true
optimizer_index_caching     90
optimizer_index_cost_adj     25
parallel_automatic_tuning     false
pga_aggregate_target     2GB
query_rewrite_enabled     true
session_cached_cursors     300
shared_pool_size     2.5GB
optimizercost_model     choose
1 Recommendations:
You are not using large blocksizes for your index tablespaces. Oracle research proves that indexes will build flatter tree structures in larger blocksizes.

Systemwide Tuning using STATSPACK Reports [ID 228913.1] and http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/statspack-examples/ should be useful.

Single Sign On and BeX Analyzer

Hello All,
Does anyone know of a way of using windows authentication (via Active Directory) to automate the login prompt in the BeX Excel Analyzer? I have found a solution for the BI portal via SPNego, but have not been able to find any discussion or documentation about automating the BeX Excel Analyzer login prompt. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks, --Matt

Hi Derick,
I want to make our discussion into 2 parts
1) Sign on
2) Viewing data based on the Heirarchy
1)Before discussing about the Sign on i want to know which connectivity you are using ? Live offcie or QaaWS.
2) We can make the second point possible in two ways One is with providing restriction at universe level
and the other one is through the use of flash variables.
Using flash variables:
The main idea of using flash variables is reading the User ID from BO authentication and based on that we fetch the Heirarchy level of that user. Then we use some excel logic to hide the data from Low level heirarchy(Here we use Dynamic Visibility for components).
I hope this is what you ar looking for....
If so i have more points to acheive such scenario.
Please provide the your BO environment details, such that it will be easy to identify the better best wat to acheve it.
Regards,
AnjaniKumar C.A.

How to change Analyzer user password with Administration API?

Hi, I would like to change Analyzer user password with Administration API. Can someone post some sample commands to do the task? I would just like to write an application to change end user's Analyzer password. As I see I would need to do the following: 1. login with admin userid/password 2. execute some method to change password for required userid. I think the input parameter should be userid (of the user I would like to change password) and new password (the new password for the user). 3. logout Can someone post some sample code (commands to execute)? Thanks, grofaty My system: Analyzer Server 7.0.1. Essbase server 7.1 Windows XP SP2 

<blockquote>quote: <hr>Originally posted by: knightrich Hello Mr. Jordan. I would like to exchange some thoughts about "housekeeping" Analyzer reports in preparation for migration from Analyzer 7.0.0.0.01472 to 9.x: ... Did you solved such a problem or do you have an idea if it could be solved with the Admin API methods? ... Migration from 7.00 to 9.x: As we heard last week the "Migration Wizard for Reports" in 9.3 should be able to migrate reports. Do you have experience or more detailed information about that Wizard? Many thanks in advance knigthrich<hr></blockquote> knighrich, I'd like to be more help, but I have no experience with System 9. I did substantial cleanup when we migrated from Analyzer 6 to Analyzer 7.1, and even more cleanup when moving up to 7.2, but our installation is smaller in scale than yours and we didn't need to automate report cleanup. You might be able to get the ownership information you need through the back door, doing a direct query on the database, but simpler might be an export users, at least from 7.0. (This facility probably doesn't exist in system 9; it was dropped in 7.2 in favor of an undocumented API) The export file is an xml file that could easily be parsed to identify reports that have the administrator as user and then a second pass to delete those with otuer ownership as well. As previously suggested, you might be able to get this by a well crafted SQL query against the repository. Procedurally, we have both public reports that have the blessing of management and are widely available, owned by a "public owner", and private reports developed by indivdual users and shared or not. Our team maintains the public reports, but not the private reports. We may be asked to make a previously private report public and take over maintenance of it. I hope that you can find a solution that meets your needs. Certainly a call to customer support to identify a poorly documented feature would be in order.

Bitrate analyzer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for