BizTalk EDI Diassembler Pipeline Issue.

Hi All,
I am using BizTalk EDI Pipeline to diassemble an input EDIFACT D93A message. The message has IMD(Item Description) segment with a space between (: and Cream bar)like below and it is failing in the validation.
IMD+F++::: Cream Bar soap 4-pk'
QTY+12:15.000'
I dont have any party configured so as per my understanding, it will use the EDI Fallback properties where i set Validation property of "Leading and trailing spaces and zeros policy" to Allowed, but still it is getting failed.
Kindly help ?
Thanks,
Varun
Thanks, Varun

There seems to be other people experiencing problems with this features in 2013 / 2013 R2.
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c146a7e7-ebe6-4b43-8139-ac9d96f4a92d/biztalk-2013-failed-to-allow-leading-and-trailing-sapce-and-zero-on-party-agreement?forum=biztalkediandas2
Morten la Cour

Similar Messages

BizTalk EDI pipeline not failing due to NTE^02 exceeding 80 characters

Hi,
I have a case where special characters are used in the free form description that is placed in an NTE^02 segment in an outbound EDI document. The maximum length allowed for NTE^02 is 80 characters. But if a special character (Europe) is in the text,
it is supposed to be counted as 2 characters not 1. This is not being caught by the BizTalk EDI pipeline and file is failing EDI validation on the partners side due to this.
Any ideas if this is a bug or I am not setting a configuration?
Thanks!

Then you need to check their Companion Guide, or ask them, exactly what character set they're expecting.
If they say
"SóME TEXT" is 10 characters, then they are likely expecting Basic, or maybe Extended which is single
byte encoding (it's just ASCII), but you are sending UTF8. "ó" is a valid Extended single byte character but in UTF8 would be double-byte.
X12 supports UTF8 so double-byte characters are allowed, provided both sides agree.
Whatever the correct value, the better place to set it would be in the Agreement.
Thanks. I'll it out.
The partner is using UTF-8 which is what i am setting (and default). So does that mean "ó" is correctly being seen by the partner as occupying 2 characters lengths?

BizTalk Server 2010 - Batching Issue

Hi - I have setup and configured a Party and under Batching configuration setup the Party Name, Filter as ReceivePortName and Message Type and setup schedule for testing for every 5 mins. When I am dropping the message receiving following errors :
xlang/s engine event log entry: Uncaught exception (see the 'inner exception' below) has suspended an instance of service 'Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.RoutingOrchestration.BatchRoutingService(49b4780c-52fe-7b25-8e71-23f6d6ba8962)'.
The service instance will remain suspended until administratively resumed or terminated.
If resumed the instance will continue from its last persisted state and may re-throw the same unexpected exception.
InstanceId: bc7e6a70-9f6c-413f-9746-18266fba7b63
Shape name:
ShapeId: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
Exception thrown from: segment 1, progress 0
Inner exception: Exception occurred when persisting state to the database.
Exception type: PersistenceException
Source: Microsoft.XLANGs.BizTalk.Engine
Target Site: Void Commit()
The following is a stack trace that identifies the location where the exception occured
at Microsoft.BizTalk.XLANGs.BTXEngine.BTXXlangStore.Commit()
at Microsoft.BizTalk.XLANGs.BTXEngine.BTXXlangStore.ScheduleComplete(Boolean terminate)
at Microsoft.BizTalk.XLANGs.BTXEngine.BTXService.ScheduleComplete(Context ctx, Boolean finalPersisting, Boolean terminate)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.Service.Persist(Boolean dehydrate, Context ctx, Boolean idleRequired, Boolean finalPersist, Boolean bypassCommit, Boolean terminate)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.TransactionalContext.OnCommit()
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.AtomicTransaction.OnCommit()
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.RoutingOrchestration.BatchRoutingService.segment1(StopConditions stopOn)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.SegmentScheduler.RunASegment(Segment s, StopConditions stopCond, Exception& exp)
Additional error information:
A batch item failed persistence Item-ID 69062828-e34d-42c6-8c38-bd43bee7c619 OperationType MAIO_CommitBatch Status -1061151998 ErrorInfo The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. .
Exception type: PersistenceItemException
Additional error information:
A batch item failed persistence Item-ID bc7e6a70-9f6c-413f-9746-18266fba7b63 OperationType MAIO_InstanceComplete Status 12589892 ErrorInfo .
Exception type: PersistenceItemException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
MBH

This error can occur when the RoutingOrchestration attempts to send a message to the BatchingOrchestration and the BatchingOrchestration instance is not started.
Ensure that the BatchingOrchestration instances are running before submitting documents to be batched.
Known Issues with EDI Batching
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful.

Receive pipeline issue in BizTalk

Hi All,
I'm getting below error frequently in BizTalk while the records triggering from inbound to out bound.
Here Inbound transport Type : FILE and Outbound transport Type :
WCF-BasicHttp
Log Name:      Application
Source:        BizTalk Server
Date:          18/2/2015 12:38:53 PM
Event ID:      5719
Task Category: BizTalk Server
Level:         Error
Keywords:      Classic
User:         N/A
Computer:      someserver.local
Description:
There was a failure executing the receive pipeline: " BizTalk.Pipeline.ReceiveMeasureCSVs, SLNG.BizTalk.Pipeline, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=bb4520a982c06a31" Source: "ESB Dispatcher" Receive Port: "SLNG_DynamicResolutionOneWay"somelocation
_*.csv" Reason: Root element is missing.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
    <Provider Name="BizTalk Server" />
    <EventID Qualifiers="49344">5719</EventID>
    <Level>2</Level>
    <Task>1</Task>
    <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2015-02-18T04:38:53.000000000Z" />
    <EventRecordID>2022354</EventRecordID>
    <Channel>Application</Channel>
    <Computer>someserver.local</Computer>
    <Security />
</System>
<EventData>
    <Data> BizTalk.Pipeline.ReceiveMeasureCSVs, SLNG.BizTalk.Pipeline, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=bb4520a982c06a31</Data>
    <Data>ESB Dispatcher</Data>
    <Data>SLNG_DynamicResolutionOneWay</Data>
    <Data>\\sftp server location_*.csv</Data>
    <Data>Root element is missing.</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
How can i fix this error. Could you please assist me on this.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Vasu

Hi,
Check the output of the map creating the msg to be sent to the port.
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/19ae19f2-1799-4b2a-a056-1619a955fa19/issue-with-publishing-schema-as-webservice-using-wcfbasichttp-two-way-channel?forum=biztalkgeneral#3492ac06-708a-4b3c-a594-e249fcfa57e3
Regards Pushpendra K Singh

Biztalk EDI error

I received this error:
Error: 1 (Miscellaneous error)
16: Invalid Control Standard Identifier
Error: 2 (Field level error)
SegmentID: ISA
Position in TS: 1
Data Element ID: ISA11
Position in Segment: 11
Data Value: ^
7: Invalid code value.
The sequence number of the suspended message is 1.
I believe it is pointing to this value ^ but my whole edi file has this character ^. I know the fact that it is supposed to be changed to the value capital U
But I would still want to process this file to my SQL server with the value ^. How can I achieve that? any receive pipeline settings that needs to be edited?
Christiane

Maheshkumar,
I created a receive pipeline and used the EDI disassembler and I checked this property to TRUE, (USEISA11ASREPETIONSEPARATOR) and that fixes this particular issue but then Biztalk displayed 3 errors in the application log.
Error: 1 (Field level error)
SegmentID: ST
Position in TS: 1
Data Element ID: CIMCode
Position in Segment: 4
Data Value:
1: Mandatory data element missing
Error: 2 (Field level error)
SegmentID: PER
Position in TS: 1580
Data Element ID: PER04_CommunicationNumber
Position in Segment: 4
Data Value:
6: Leading or trailing space found
Error: 3 (Field level error)
SegmentID: PER
Position in TS: 5210
Data Element ID: PER04_CommunicationNumber
Position in Segment: 4
Data Value:
6: Leading or tra
Christiane

Biztalk EDI ISA12 Invalid

HI Experts,
Am getting below error,
Error: 1 (Miscellaneous error)
17: Invalid VersionId
Error: 2 (Field level error)
SegmentID: ISA
Position in TS: 1
Data Element ID: ISA12
Position in Segment: 12
Data Value: 004010
7: Invalid code value
As my partner is sending that value, I thought of editing service extension schema also, but i can't found that.
Without using custom pipeline can any suggest where we can add custom values to ISA12, so that it will reflect in Party configuration in Biztalk 2013

Hi Sandy,
I see now that Customizing Enumeration won't help as you can't add Enumerations ISA12, only below fields can be modified:
ISA01 – Authorization Qualifier
ISA03 – Security Qualifier
ISA05 – Sender ID Qualifier
ISA07 - Receiver ID Qualifier
GS01 - Functional Code
GS07 - Responsible Agency
So this option is ruled out.
I would ask you to
apply hot fix on your dev env and test (Ideally it should resolve the issue) . But ff applying hot fix does not help then you should contact
Microsoft Support
reporting this bug.
Maheshkumar
S Tiwari|User
Page|Blog|BizTalk
Server : Fetching UNB and UNG Segment Values From Interchange Envelope and Mapping

EDI Message type issue

Dear Friends,
In my current project my issue is related to EDI Message type the problem is as below
If I use output type (message type) NEU which is SAP standard and if I select this out put type (NEU) with medium EDI after saving this I can see all the data segments in Outbound Idoc.
Now the actual issue is if I use the ZNET customize output type which is the extension of NEU with medium type EDI after saving this if I check the Idoc (We02) I am not able to see few purchase orders data segments like E1EDKT1(Header Text ) and E1EDPt1(Item Text)
What could be the reasons? Is there any setting where output types and data segments are linked
Your help will be highly appreciated
With Best Regards,
Ashish Vats

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I have maintained all the parameters in partner profile.... I think Could not explained the issue in detail.
the issue is as below
When I select the output type ZNET in purchase order and medium EDI(Partner profile for Vendor maintained for outbound PO) after saving the same when I check the outbound IDOC generated by system in that some segments are not coming while in NEU output type all the segments are coming properly.
ZNET is the Extension of NEU .. now my question is to forum where output types are linked with segments ?so that I can compare the ZNET with NEU and findout the missing segments or could link the missing segments with ZNET
Hope I could explained you...........
Regards,
Ashish

BizTalk MIME Encoder - Filename issue

Hi All,
I am using MIME enoder component. In order to assign a proper name for the attachment, I used the below code in a custom pipeline component.
attachmentPart.PartProperties.Write("FileName", "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/mime-properties","SampleXml - Copy.xml");
However, when I see the actual message that is transmitted (using fiddler), file name is encoded into some cryptic value like below..
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: {17DE6096-2E1A-4F6A-BD27-7F6532AE4E10}
Content-Description: SampleXml - Copy.xml
Content-Disposition: filename="=?utf-8?B?U2FtcGxlWG1sIC0gQ29weS54bWx=?="
My end system wants specific file name to be present in Content-Disposition. Does any one have any idea why this is happening and how to correct it ?
Thanks in advance...

For the benfit of others,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/454833/system-net-mail-and-utf-8bxxxxx-headers has the answer for my question.
When I send a file with name: SampleXml.xml
and it is converted to “=?utf-8?B?U2FtcGxlWG1sLnhtbA==?=”
by MIME Encoder
Pipeline component.
Base64 encoded value of SampleXml.xml
is U2FtcGxlWG1sLnhtbA==

Biztalk EDI 856 Mapping H1 Segment

Hi,
I'm new to EDI 856 mapping in Biztalk. I have to map xml schema to EDI 856 XSD and generate a EDI file through biztalk.
I've 3 datasets (repeating nodes) in internal schema (shipment level, order level and item level) I have to map this data to EDI 856 in Biztalk mapping. But the complexity is i have to map all the data's with-in HL loop. I have to repeat HL loop thrice
for shipment level , order level , and item level and each time i should map data to different segments. (ex: i should have LIN segment only at item level).
My output should be like
<HL> --SHIPMENT LEVEL
<TD1></TD1>
<TD3></TD3>
<REF></REF>
<FOB></FOB>
<HL> -- ORDER LEVEL
<TD1></TD1>
<REF></REF>
<N1></N1>
<HL> --ITEM LEVEL
<LIN></LIN>
<SN1></SN1>
<TD></TD>
The problem i face is since i loop HL segment the N1 which should be present only at order level gets repeated at shipment and item level too. Please help me or suggest any study material , its urgent.
Thanks in advance..

Hi,
I can anyone help me to map a flat XSD to a structured XSD in biztalk mapping.
Incoming Schema
Record
<Shipmentdata>
<Shipmentdata1>
<Shipmentdata2>
<Orderdata>
<Orderdata1>
<Orderdata2>
<ItemData>
<ItemData1>
<ItemData2>
OutputSchema
<shipmentData>
<OrderData>
<ItemData>
My input schema is a flat one which i take from DB (ex: if there is 15 items in one shipment and 3 orders the xml will repeat 15 times with repeating data in shipment node and order node). I should convert it into a Structured XML with 3 level of hierarchy.
Please help with Biztalk mapper example. Thanks in advance.

4010_850 EDI file Generation issue.

Hi All,
We are facing issue in converting 850 EDI XML to EDI file.
We could generate a simple EDI based on mandatory elements. But when we try to provide DTM and AMT values , We are hitting below issues..
I am missing some basic stuff. Please find the EDI XML i am trying to convert to EDI file.
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?><Transaction-850 xmlns:ns1="urn:oracle:b2b:X12/V4010/850" Standard="X12" xmlns="urn:oracle:b2b:X12/V4010/850">
<ns1:Segment-ST>
<ns1:Element-143>850</ns1:Element-143>
<ns1:Element-329>000000010</ns1:Element-329>
</ns1:Segment-ST>
<ns1:Segment-BEG>
<ns1:Element-353>00</ns1:Element-353>
<ns1:Element-92>NE</ns1:Element-92>
<ns1:Element-324>12345678</ns1:Element-324>
<ns1:Element-373>20140703</ns1:Element-373>
</ns1:Segment-BEG>
<ns1:Loop-PO1>
<ns1:Segment-PO1>
<ns1:Element-350>001</ns1:Element-350>
<ns1:Element-330>1</ns1:Element-330>
<ns1:Element-212>96</ns1:Element-212>
<ns1:Element-639>AA</ns1:Element-639>
<ns1:Element-235_1>VC</ns1:Element-235_1>
<ns1:Element-234_1>571157</ns1:Element-234_1>
<ns1:Element-235_2>CB</ns1:Element-235_2>
<ns1:Element-234_2>00100</ns1:Element-234_2>
</ns1:Segment-PO1>
<ns1:Loop-PID>
<ns1:Segment-PID>
<ns1:Element-349>F</ns1:Element-349>
<ns1:Element-352>Rockford product</ns1:Element-352>
</ns1:Segment-PID>
</ns1:Loop-PID>
<ns1:Segment-DTM>
<ns1:Element-374>038</ns1:Element-374>
<ns1:Element-373>20140626</ns1:Element-373>
</ns1:Segment-DTM>
<ns1:Loop-AMT>
<ns1:Segment-AMT>
<ns1:Element-522>1</ns1:Element-522>
<ns1:Element-782>1</ns1:Element-782>
</ns1:Segment-AMT></ns1:Loop-AMT>
</ns1:Loop-PO1>
<ns1:Segment-SE>
<ns1:Element-96>#SegmentCount#</ns1:Element-96>
<ns1:Element-329>000000010</ns1:Element-329>
</ns1:Segment-SE>
</Transaction-850>
Only DTM passed :
=============
Error :
Extra Element was found in the data file as part of Segment DTM. Segment DTM is defined in the guideline at position 210.{br}{br}This error was detected at:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 5{br}{tab}Element Count: 1{br}{tab}Characters: 1014 through 1017
Extra Element was found in the data file as part of Segment DTM. Segment DTM is defined in the guideline at position 210.{br}{br}This error was detected at:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 5{br}{tab}Element Count: 2{br}{tab}Characters: 1052 through 1060
Element DTM01 (Date/Time Qualifier) is missing. This Element's standard option is 'Mandatory'. Segment DTM is defined in the guideline at position 210.{br}{br}This Element was expected in:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 5{br}{tab}Element Count: 1{br}{tab}Character: 1078
DTM + AMT Passed :
===============
Error : Extra Element was found in the data file as part of Segment DTM. Segment DTM is defined in the guideline at position 210.{br}{br}This error was detected at:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 5{br}{tab}Element Count: 1{br}{tab}Characters: 1014 through 1022 Extra Element was found in the data file as part of Segment DTM. Segment DTM is defined in the guideline at position 210.{br}{br}This error was detected at:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 5{br}{tab}Element Count: 2{br}{tab}Characters: 1057 through 1060 Element DTM01 (Date/Time Qualifier) is missing. This Element's standard option is 'Mandatory'. Segment DTM is defined in the guideline at position 210.{br}{br}This Element was expected in:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 5{br}{tab}Element Count: 1{br}{tab}Character: 1078 Unrecognized data was found in the data file as part of Loop PO1. The last known Segment was DTM at guideline position 210.{br}{br}This error was detected at:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 6{br}{tab}Characters: 1278 through 1286 Unrecognized data was found in the data file as part of Loop PO1. The last known Segment was DTM at guideline position 210.{br}{br}This error was detected at:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 7{br}{tab}Characters: 1295 through 1367
Thanks in advance,
Siddhardha
Manager , Deloitte Consutling.

Issue is solved with the files provided by oracle support. They used Document editor version
Oracle Document Editor -> 7.0.5.4018 & X12 - 8.0.0.186
Not sure what is wrong with our files.
We used document editor 7.0.5.4043 & X12 - 8.0.0.186
Below is the update i put in SR.
==================================
My xsd contains below text.
<xsd:appinfo>
<UNMKey>Full|CodeList|-<Parent Node ID>.<Index>|Composite|-<Node ID>|Element|-<Node ID>|Loop|-<Node ID>|Segment|-<Node ID>|Transaction|-<Node ID>|ReplacementCharacter|_|InternalSeparator|-</UNMKey>
</xsd:appinfo>
===================
The file you provided have the below.
<xsd:appinfo>
<UNMKey>Full|Default|-<Node ID>|CodeList|-<Parent Node ID>.<Index>|ReplacementCharacter|_|InternalSeparator|-
</UNMKey>
</xsd:appinfo>
Not sure if that is really causing the issue.
==========================================
If anyone is interested here is the SR number (#3-9312618901)
Thanks,
Sid

EDI Convertion Space Issue

Hi
We are converting EDI to XML using "localejbs/X12ConverterModule" , after conversion we still see D_I06 has space left over, which is failing in VM mapping, i stripped out space using UDF, works fine, anyone experienced same issue in EDI convertion
To test it, I took XMl form B2B mapping http://sap.com/xi/B2B/Examples/ANSIX12 > MM_ASC850_4010_TO_ORDERS05, by default D_I06 has space left over, I understand for D_I02 & D_I04 but not clear for D_I06
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:ASC850_004010 xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/B2B/Examples/ANSIX12">
   <S_ISA>
      <D_DATAELEMENTSEPARATOR>*</D_DATAELEMENTSEPARATOR>
      <D_I01>00</D_I01>
      <D_I02>          </D_I02>
      <D_I03>00</D_I03>
     <D_I04>          </D_I04>
     <D_I05>ZZ</D_I05>
      <D_I06>SAP0001       </D_I06>
Check the attached document
Checked with X12 modules still the same
Configuring the Converter Module Parameters - SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, business-to-business add-on 1.0 - SAP L…

Hello,
Seeburger apparently just pushes the content to the target message. The B2B add-on contains business logic to verify lengths, based on the XML schema.
Seeburger also uses logic to verify that incoming EDI-Files are following the syntax rules, and also verifies outgoing EDI messages in the same way to make sure that all EDIFACT/ANSI X12 Syntax rules are fullfilled.
However in this example an incoming ANSI X12-file is translated to the XML-equivalent and for the XML-ANSI X12 which is then created from the original ANSI X2 file, not the same "syntax rules" need to be applied (as they cannot be applied anyway with the XML-possibilities)....also there is no definition existing on how an XML-equivalent of an ANSI X12 file need to look like....therefor it is just a defined behaviour of Seeburger that this incoming field is modified by stripping away the leading spaces....(since field length are anyway not verified on XML-side)
Kind Regards
Stefan

EDI Seperator Channel Issue - Single EDI File is Creating Two IDOCs

Hi Experts,
We are facing a strange issue in our project. We are working on SAP PO 7.4 SP06. Our's is an EDI to IDOC Scenario. We are using standard EDI XSD's generated by B2B 2.0 Cockpit. Since yesterday our Quality server is behaving strangely. Its processing an EDI File and generating TWO IDocs out of it.
When we run the same EDI File in our DEV Environment it executes perfectly and creates only ONE IDOC.
Signature in OM and it is 1 to 1 and in MM Target IDOC header is mapped to "Constant".
Our Scenario is :
1st IFLow : File to EDISeperator
2nd IFlow: EDISeperator to IDOC.
Appreciate your valuable inputs.

Hi,
Please do check your input file(s). Could be that you offer an EDI interchange, containing multiple messages, to SAP PO.
Also, maybe in the mean time, some objects or configuration was changed.
Kind regards,
Dimitri

BizTalk FTP send port issue

Hi,
I’m receiving following error while sending message to an ftp link from BizTalk 2010 in production.
Unable to connect to FTP server "ipaddress" as user "username". Inner Exception details: "No FTP server found on the specified address. ".
Previously, everything was working fine. What could be the issue? It’s very urgent as it’s in production. Please help.
Thanks.
Kunal G

Kunal,
I am getting the same error on Windows 8 OS and BizTalk server 2010. Can you suggest how to fix this firewall settings?
thanks
Rama K

Biztalk Custom Send Pipeline Error

Hello Experts,
I have been trying to work with the Custom Send Pipeline, which picks up the .xml file which has the path directory of the file needs to be sent to the destination. I used the code from
here to practice how it works
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;
using Microsoft.BizTalk.Message.Interop;
using Microsoft.BizTalk.Component.Interop;
using System.IO;
namespace Sample.SndLargeFiles
[ComponentCategory(CategoryTypes.CATID_PipelineComponent)]
[ComponentCategory(CategoryTypes.CATID_Encoder)]
[System.Runtime.InteropServices.Guid("52dcc4e5-28e1-49a2-81fd-de496ac80fe8")]
public class SampleSndLargeFiles : IBaseComponent, IComponentUI, IComponent
#region IBaseComponent Members
public string Description
get
return "Send Large Files to destination reading from disk";
public string Name
get
return "SampleSndLargeFiles";
public string Version
get
return "1.0.0.0";
#endregion
#region IComponentUI Members
public IntPtr Icon
get
return new System.IntPtr();
public System.Collections.IEnumerator Validate(object projectSystem)
return null;
#endregion
#region IComponent Members
public IBaseMessage Execute(IPipelineContext pContext, IBaseMessage pInMsg)
// Read filepath from the context properties
string largeFilePath = pInMsg.Context.Read("LargeFilePath", "https://SamplePL.PropertySchema").ToString();
// Read file from disk
int bufferSize = 1024;
FileStream fs = new FileStream(largeFilePath, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.Read, bufferSize);
if (fs.CanSeek)
fs.Position = 0;
pInMsg.BodyPart.Data = fs;
return pInMsg;
#endregion
I am getting error when I am trying to use in my send Port
"Reason: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. "
I have checked GAC and restarted the host instances after deploying the pipeline but nothing helps.Any help is greatly appreciated.Thanks

Johns,
If I debug the orginal code it shows
"An exception of type 'System.NullReferenceException' occurred in Jax.Dhana.SndLargeFiles.dll but was not handled in user code
Additional information: Object reference not set to an instance of an object."
in the below line
string largeFilePath = pInMsg.Context.Read("LargeFilePath", "https://SamplePL.PropertySchema").ToString()
If I change the code to
string largeFilePath = System.String.Empty;
object propVal = pInMsg.Context.Read("LargeFilePath", "https://SamplePL.PropertySchema");
if (propVal != null) {
largeFilePath = (System.String) propVal;
I am seeing "Empty path name is not legal" on the below line,
FileStream fs = new FileStream(largeFilePath, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.Read, bufferSize);

Biztalk EDi schema Validation

Hi Experts,
Currently we are validating the EDI IFSCUM schemas at the pipeline level, now I have a requirement in such a way that the message should come to Orchestration and in Orchestration i will validate the incoming message against schema validation method.
I tried to keep the edivalidation set to false and dropped the message with wrong record count in UNT record.
But this message is failing at port level, i need to pass this message to orchestration.
How can i bypass these kind of validations at port level?

Hi Sandy,
Some of the EDI validations are performed always irrespective whether the EDI validation is enabled or not.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb226369.aspx
Refer the msdn article above. This specifies the validation that are performed always and validation which are done only if the EDI Data validation is enabled.
Regards, Vivin.

BizTalk EDI Diassembler Pipeline Issue.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for