Block Cookies at Domain Level

In early Firefox I would set cookie rules at the domain level using the wildcard - for example - *.tubmogul.com would be accepted, blocked, or allowed for session.
In current 3.x and 4.x implementations this does not appear to be possible and I feel like I am spending a good portion of the day blocking the various "n.domain.com" where "n" varies by site and within a site.
Ideas?

Don't use a wildcard with *. Only specify the domain, that includes all sub domains: tubmogul.com

Similar Messages

Help with allowing / blocking cookies

I use Logmein.com a lot to communicate with my office computer. I also have cookies set to ask me every time. Every time I want to log in to my office computer i receive a request to allow a cookie for the website which looks like this:
ihs-officepc-qhtpieiuip.app04-15.logmein.com
The problem is that every time the part of the url after ihs-officepc-............................................ is different. So I can not simply allow the site to set cookies, I have to answer the question every time.
Is there a way to set the domain to allow or to use wildcards to set up an allow situation that will recognize that I wish to allow cookies from this connection without having to answer the question every time?

You would have to set an allow exception for the top level domain (logmein.com) to make this work.
Note that you can get a lot of such request if you elect the 'ask me' setting to allow/block cookies.

How can I block a specific domain suffix, like .eu

I have been getting lots of spam from email addresses with suffix .eu and so I would like to block all such emails. Is that possible in the latest version of Mac Mail? How is it done?

The real answer is that as mailers get more and more bloated with features, they lose some of the basic features that existed decades ago. Blocking by domain is one of those features.
If you block messages with ".eu" (or whatever) in the From field, you will block ANY mail from ANY person or domain that has "eu" in it.
Apple really, really, really, needs to update the Mail program and fix a number of problems, and add features that people demand like domain-level blocking.
Other things that are broken include: failing to empty the junk mailbox regardless of your settings, when you create your own rules Mail will re-order them to its own liking even if that's not what you wanted, missing functionality in rules such as actually marking things as junk (if you just move them to the junk folder Mail still think it's real incoming mail and plays its incoming mail sound and marks the message as unread), etc.
Mail really, really, needs an overhaul.

ToyStore: Pagination returns ORA-01008 when blocking cookies in Firefox

Hi all,
In Internet Explorer, I have set the option to block all cookies (via Tools -> Internet Options -> Privacy -> shift slider to topmost level: "Block All Cookies"). In Firefox, I did the same via (Tools -> Options -> Privacy -> Cookies -> uncheck "Allow sites to set cookies").
Next, I tried to run the ToyStore demo in both browsers. When I select "Toys" in the menu, and then press the "Next" link to scroll through the pages, pagination works fine in IE. However, in Firefox, as soon as I press the "Next" link, I get the message: "ORA-01008: not all variables bound".
Now, which of them is right :-) ? Is pagination supposed to work at all when blocking cookies? I am asking this because I try to implement the pagination mechanism in another application.
Thanks for any replies and insights in this matter.

Hi Steve,
Thanks for taking interest in this matter. I tried your suggestions, as follows (these are extracts from the bc4j?????.log file):
[427] BC4J Property jbo.dofailover='false' -->(Configuration) from Client Environment
[448] BC4J Property jbo.connectfailover='false' -->(SessionImpl) from Client Environment
but I still received the error. I also tried the combinations of "true" and "false" for these properties - still no change.
In all cases, things started working again after I allowed to set cookies in the Firefox browser, even if I changed it within the same session that earlier returned the error message. As soon as I unchecked the "cookies allowed" setting, pagination returned the error again.
B.T.W.: if, after selecting "Toys" on the Home page, you click on one of links (for instance: "Robot"), you get the error message below. So it not solely a pagination issue.
Maybe you (or someone else) has any more ideas how to address this? Many thanks again for your efforts.
This is the error message I get when clicking the "Robot" link:
javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: Missing message for key "T-ROB-1"
     at org.apache.struts.taglib.bean.MessageTag.doStartTag(MessageTag.java:297)
     at web2d_inf._jsp._showcategory._jspService(showcategory.jsp:18)
     [WEB-INF/jsp/showcategory.jsp]
     at oracle.jsp.runtime.HttpJsp.service(HttpJsp.java:139)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageTable.service(JspPageTable.java:349)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.internalService(JspServlet.java:509)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:413)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.ResourceFilterChain.doFilter(ResourceFilterChain.java:65)
     at oracle.security.jazn.oc4j.JAZNFilter.doFilter(Unknown Source)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:604)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:317)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forward(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:220)
     at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.doForward(RequestProcessor.java:1069)
     at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processForwardConfig(RequestProcessor.java:455)
     at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:279)
     at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1482)
     at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doGet(ActionServlet.java:507)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.ResourceFilterChain.doFilter(ResourceFilterChain.java:65)
     at oracle.security.jazn.oc4j.JAZNFilter.doFilter(Unknown Source)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.EvermindFilterChain.doFilter(EvermindFilterChain.java:16)
     at oracle.adf.model.servlet.ADFBindingFilter.doFilter(ADFBindingFilter.java:228)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:600)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:317)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:790)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:270)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:112)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.0.0)].util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:192)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

Domain Level and Backup AD as VM?

We're currently running Windows 2012 R2 Essentials (25 users license default) as the DC. We're thinking to have the 2008R2 as the secondary (backup) DC. Questions are:
1. We have AD recycle bin enable, would it cause any issues lower the domain level to 2008R2?
2. Can 2008R2 run as a VM on a Hyper-V (the host is 2008R2 and part of the domain, but not DC)?
Thank you,

Yes you can run a VM and promote it as a Domain Controller, however if your domain / forest functional level is set to Windows Server 2012 then you cannot have a Windows Server 2008 R2 as a domain Controller. For this you need to have Windows Server 2008
R2 domain functional Level.
Domain Functional Level and Forest Functional level cannot be downgraded. if it's already set to Server 2012 functional level then you cannot downgrade it to 2008 R2. Please go ahead and check what's ur Forest & Domain functional Level
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/understanding-active-directory-functional-levels(v=ws.10).aspx
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753104.aspx
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc730985.aspx
Nirmal Madhawa Thewarathanthri
Sorry but you are wrong. I just lowered the levels to 2008R2.

How can I add a blocking cookie to keep by Blogger stats feature from counting my own page views? Blogger has a pop-up menu that promises to do this, but it has not worked.

This is the message from the Blogger stats pop-up:
"Don't track your own page views: You can tell Blogger not to include your own pageviews in its stats. To do this, Blogger must add a blocking cookie to your browser."
I click on the "Don't track my pageviews" option and click "save." However, my own pageviews are still being tracked. Can I do this operation myself?
Regards — Ed

Hi ben_burrowes, the disallow future dialogs checkbox appears on normal sites, no add-on required, but apparently some sites have found a way around it.
In a thread about a different inescapable website problem a user suggested gutting the page using the Inspector. I haven't tested it on the kind of page you're encountering, but here's how you would do it: right-click a blank area near the margin of the page, and choose Inspect Element (Q). This should open a panel with some element of the page's HTML code selected. You're looking for the <body> tag, scroll up if necessary, then right-click it and choose Delete Node. You also could delete the <head> node. There's a good chance this will cripple the script that's preventing you from leaving the page. Obviously not an approach you would want to have to use often, but you could practice it for potential emergencies.

I can't get my iphone 5. Ios 7, to accept cookies. I have set the 'block cookies' field ti either never or from third parties. I have cleared history and cookies and data, restart the iphone. Please help...

I upgraded my iphone to os 7 two days ago. However, now it cant accept cookies at all. I have set field 'block cookies' to never or from third parties. I have cleared history and cookies, then reboot my iphone. I have tries to force close all applications. Still, cant accept cookies. Please help...

Make sure you have the latest iTunes version installed and hopefully you have the most recent backup of your iPhone. Do a DFU restore. While it's plugged in to your computer, press and hold the Home and Sleep/Wake buttons together until the screen is off. When the screen's off, release only the Sleep/Wake button and keep holding down the Home button. Wait until you see in iTunes on your computer to show that it detected it in recovery mode. When it does, proceed with the restore. It will be restored and updated to the latest iOS 7.0.2. If you have a backup, restore from that backup once iOS 7.0.2 is successfully installed on your iPhone.
If your iPhone still won't activate, I agree with gail, you will have to get in touch with that developer.

Hi, While installing XQuatrz-2.7.7, the installation blocks at the "destination" level. It asks how to install this soft, "Install for all users" is shadowed, but frozen: i cannot select anything and move on. Any idea how to get that fixed? Thanks!

Hi,
While installing XQuatrz-2.7.7, the installation blocks at the "destination" level. It asks how to install this soft, "Install for all users" is shadowed, but frozen: i cannot select anything and move on. Any idea how to get that fixed?
Thanks!

It says above 2 relevant and 1 correct answere available .............
I'm new here so could anyone direct me to these answeres?

Firefox Help page on "blocking cookies" is incomplete and refers to a "tool" menu that does not exist

The following page:
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Blocking%20cookies?s=blocking+cookies&as=s
is incomplete - please see as example:
"Viewing a list of blocked sites
To see a list of sites that you have blocked from setting cookies: "
There is no text after the colon.
Also the same page refers to selecting a "Tools" menu from the Firefox window(whatever that is?) - in order to get "Page info" so that cookies can be blocked. I can't the Tools menu - clicking on the Firefox (at top left hand of page) does not give this option.
I was looking at this page in order to find out how to permanently block specific cookie sites. I block them when they appear when I have set "accept 3rd party cookes to "keep until" - "ask me every time" - and I also have "clear history when Firefox closes" set. However the blocked addresses are deleted when I come out of Firefox - this is very irritating as there are some cookies I wish to permanently block. This means that every time I open a web site I have to click on "deny" cookie several times - even thought they are the same ones I have blocked in a differenrt session. I prefer to choose what I block as some sites really don't work without their personal cookies - usually to support subscriber log in (e.g to log in to the "New Scientist" site)so "private browsing" doesn't really help and as you have mentioned elsewhere blocking 3rd party cookies can also cause problems
yours
H.Ruddy
Thank you for "Do Not Track" it's a good start although it will have no effect if the sites ignore it.

Looks like a problem with show for that is only specified for Firefox 3.5 for that section.

Have new computer, Win 7, and the blocking cookies is not working on Firefox

I have been using XP as the OS for many, many years and have been using Firefox also with never any problems with blocking cookies using that feature. As of today, when I received the new computer, this is not functional. I have attempted to block google.com cookie several times and each time, it keeps appearing in the cookies list which shows what is on the computer. Is this a problem with Win 7, or a change in Firefox? The options windows have changed in some aspects as well. I downloaded Firefox immediately after getting the new computer.
This is very, very frustrating. Any and all help will be most appreciated.
***I attempted to follow the directions below, however it said it was being prevented from asking me to "allow"???
Firefox

How are you blocking Google from settings cookies?
Try opening the Permissions manager by typing or pasting '''about:permissions''' in the address bar and pressing Enter. Then type ''goog'' in the search box above the site list. What do you have set for google.com? See the attached screen shot for an example.

Built-In Domain Level Groups dont have permissions on domain they should on 2012

Hello,
First this is a brand new domain environment with everything running server 2012 datacenter edition.
Second I've never seen anything like the following occur in a domain environment. What I had is what appears to be a bad 2012 AD structure however so far all AD tests come back good. The problem is the built-in domain level groups do NOT offer any level
of access that they should. For example if I add a user in the administrators group, they don't have any permissions that group is supposed to have. THe same with every other builtin, backup operators, server operators, account operators and on and on. The
only way a user gets that level of access is if I add them into the domain admins group. As you can imagine this is crazy and not a solution for my help desk crew. (having them all be domain admins that is) So while I could very well use delegation, I need
to find out why my builtin groups don't function as they should. Anyone have any ideas on what to check or where to look? I'm at the point of opening a case with Microsoft on this.
Thanks in advance

Because those builtin groups AREN'T domain level groups in the way you're thinking. The Administrators group on the server gives users administrator permissions on the server, but that doesn't mean permissions on the entire domain.
If you look in the user list in ADUC you'll see that while Domain Admins are a Global security group, Administrators is only a local group, eg local to the server (or more accurately since they no longer have local details, to domain controllers), so doesn't
grant permissions to anything outside of the domain controller. On all non DC's the machines have their own local administrators group which is independent of the domain one, and can have different memberships.
So if you only need a user to have permissions to the DC then administrators is fine, but if you need them to have access to the entire network, eg other servers and workstations, then they need to be members of domain admins. If you only want them
to have limited permissions then you need to grant those permissions either via a global/universal group, or by adding them to the relevant local group on each machine they need access to.

My privacy option does not include "custom settings"and i am not able to block cookies.

To set Firefox to block cookies from all websites:
At the top of the Firefox window, click on the Firefox button (Tools menu in Windows XP) and then click Options
Select the Privacy panel.
' Set Firefox will: to Use custom settings for history.
Remove the check mark from Accept cookies from sites.
Click OK to close the Options window
"Set Firefox will: to Use custom settings for history" is not included in my privacy panel

Do you see the set Firefox will line?
Next to that text you see a clickable button and if you click that button then a drop down list with further choices will open.
See:
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Options%20window%20-%20Privacy%20panel

I can't find a way to block cookies from the Bank of America website. Is there a way to still do this?

Previously, when accessing the Bank of America Online Banking website I could keep them from placing cookies on my machine. Following your online instructions I can only deal with history. How can I block cookies with the current version of Firefox running on a Mac?

I installed the add-on, and was told it was installed, but when I go to the Bank of America site I can't find an icon to toggle. If I could find it, it sounds like what I'm looking for.
However, I have gone to the Permissions list for the BofA website and with either "Allow cookies just for this session" or "Don't allow cookies" makes it impossible to get into the site.
The frustrating thing is that I can use Safari and ALL of the security boxes show up, just as they used to do with Firefox.

Blocking cookies - I was told there was a cookie tab under Privacy with a choice for EXCEPTIONS - but 3.6.12 doesn't have it - how do I block a cookie that keeps coming back

Blocking cookies -
I was told there was a cookie tab under Privacy with a choice for EXCEPTIONS
- but 3.6.12 doesn't have it
- how do I block a cookie that keeps coming back
using 3.6.12

To see all the History and Cookie options, select: Tools > Options > Privacy > History: Firefox will: "Use custom settings for history"
See:
* [[Blocking cookies]]
* [[Enabling and disabling cookies]]

Domain level security issue with InfoPath Form

I have followed the article “Submitting Data from InfoPath 2007 to a SharePoint List” which can be found at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc162745.aspx.
But instead I am using SharePoint and InfoPath 2010.
I get the following error after deploying and running the form with its security level set to domain.
“A query to retrieve form data cannot be completed because this action would violate cross-domain restrictions. If this form template is published to a SharePoint
document library, cross-domain access for user form templates must be enabled under InfoPath Forms Services in SharePoint Central Administration, and the data connection settings must be stored in a UDC file in a data connection library in the same site collection.
If this is an administrator-approved form template, the security level of the form must be set to full trust, or the data connection settings must be stored in a UDC file by using the Manage data connection files option under InfoPath Forms Services in SharePoint
Central Administration.”
How do I get this form working on the server and client using domain level security?
Extra Note: On an additional not the form works fine in SharePoint and InfoPath designer when the security level is set to Full Trust.

Hi, Is this possible over a SharePoint "LIST"? I'm hitting brick walls and can't set the Security level on my form at all. Everything that I'm reading refers to Document Libraries but nothing about SharePoint List. It seems that this should work over a list,
but I'm hitting brick walls all the way around. Here is a copy of the question that I posed below under Todd.Wilder's post:
Hi,
Following this forum question/comment I am attempting to set the security on my Infopath form to Full Trust. But, I don't have the Security and Trust option. I can set the Trusted Location through the Trust Center but I can't find anywhere to set security.
I am using InfoPath 2010. What am I missing? Everything that I'm reading says that this is the problem and my error message is exactly like SomeGuy's message. One more piece to this is...this is a form over an Existing SharePoint List. I've found that I can
see the Security if I start InfoPath and start a New Blank Form, but by editing the form from a SharePont list, the option to edit Security is not there. HELP!!
I am following the instructions below that come from:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee526352.aspx
The InfoPath form designer automatically selects the appropriate security level (either Restricted or Domain) based on the features that you are using in the form. The security setting is always as restrictive as possible, starting at Restricted, to help
ensure a greater level of protection for you and your data. Users can manually override this automated setting to select a level of security that is more appropriate for the form by following these steps:
Click the File tab, and then click Form Options on theInfo tab.
In the Categories list, click Security and Trust.
Uncheck the Automatically determine security level (recommended) check box.
Select the desired security level.
Thank you,
~Tina~
~Tina~

Block Cookies at Domain Level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for