Boolean Checkboxes in Advanced Search

Hi all,
I'm trying to use a checkbox in the "Advanced Search Area", but appearantly, you can't use a Java type 'Boolean' in the "Advanced Search Area". What's the reason for that? And is there a workaround?
If you make the checkbox any other type than 'Boolean', you need to specifiy a domain. But I don't want a domain, I just want it to pass on 'true' or 'false'. How can you pass a JSPX checkbox value (in the "Advanced Search Area") to a VO binding variable?
Thanks in advance,
Stijn.

Stijn, this is intentional, see section 6.9 of the JHeadstart Developers Guide.
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Similar Messages

  • How to get all Conditions in Advanced Search

    Hi All,
    I'm implementing the AdvancedSearch using Query bean.
    I have defined the Criteria row with one Item of Varchar2 Datatype.
    On Advance Search the poplist shows only two conditions (Lookup type=ICX_CONDITIONS) of "is" and "is not". How to get the complete list of conditions ("contains", "ends with", "starts with"....)
    Thanks,
    Satya

    What is the item type for which you get only the two conditions.
    If the item type is OAMessageChoiceBean or OAMessageLovInputBean the conditon poplist will contain only those two options. And if the datatype is Boolean the conditon poplist will again contain only those two options.

  • To display a VARCHAR field in database as select boolean checkbox

    Hi,
    i have a table in database having a VARCHAR2(1) field named IsActive with value 'Y' or 'N' , I need to display this field as select boolean check box in the JSF page
    using ADF Entity Object and ViewObject. We have followed the following method for displaying this field as select boolean check box.
    1. Changed the datatype of the IsActive field in the Entity Object as Boolean and the database column type as Varchar2(10)
    2. we have edited the query using case when IsActive='Y' then 1 else 0 end .
    3.and converted the IsActive inputtext to select boolean checkbox.
    Thus we where able to display this field as select boolean check box but the problem is that we where not able to insert the data as 'Y' or 'N' using this method.
    Please help us whether the method we are following is correct or is there any other method to insert and display the similar fields like IsActive as select boolean check box in ADF
    Thanks in Advance
    Anitha

    Anitha,
    Create a transient boolean attribute on your EO. Write the getter to return true/false if the real attribute is Y/N. Write the setter to do the converse. Bind the transient attribute to the checkbox.
    John

  • Functionality loss when 'Using Query Bind Variables in Advanced Search

    Regarding: 'Using Query Bind Variables in Quick or Advanced Search'
    The functionality to do the following is lost when I use bind variables in the Advanced Search:
    "Result matches all conditions"
    "Result matches any condition"
    "Case Sensitive?"
    Is there a way to Search with Detail groups but to keep the above functionality?

    Hi,
    Your application module impl java class extends the JHeadstart class JhsApplicationModuleImpl. THe latter declares a method:
    public void advancedSearch(String viewObjectUsage,java.util.ArrayList arguments,Boolean allConditionsMet).
    In your application module impl java override the advancedSearch method where you can include your own custom code before invoking the super method:
    super.advancedSearch(viewObjectUsage,arguments,allConditionsMet);
    The 'arguments' parameter is an arraylist of QueryCondition objects. You can set several properties for QueryCondition objects such as case-sensitity, operators etc.
    Regards,
    Ibrahim

  • How to restrict columns in Advanced search which are known at runtime

    Hi Team,
    I need your suggestions for one of my adf search usecase. I had Querypanel with table on UI...where in Viewobject has relations with 2 other tables and this Viewobject is based on Entity...now in advanced search for addfields i was getting all column names by default like 3 tables column names....instead of all columns i need to restrict to particular columns. This particular columns will be decided at runtime like how many columns needs to be shown and alias names for those particular columns. So could you please help me how to approach this requirement.
    Thanks in Advance for your help.

    whatever you said is at designtime wherein we can uncheck the Queryable checkbox....but as i said at runtime from the application i can come to know whichever fields needs to be there and alias names for columns for add fields in Advanced search...

  • Thesaurus in advanced search

    We are writing a custom search using the advanced search but want to use the thesaurus with it. I know it only works with the banner search but is there a way to include it in advanced search......
    Ray

    Yes. Add the URL parameter in_hi_req_thesaurus=1to the end of each advanced search URL that should use the thesaurus (you should be able to try this in your browser to verify that it works). Or, if you want every advanced search query to use the thesaurus automatically, write an advanced search PEI that sets the value of PT_SEARCHSETTING_THESAURUS to Boolean.TRUE.
    Craig

  • Adobe Reader: Missing Advanced Search Options

    I am using Adobe Reader XI (probably Standard) and trying to perform regular expression searches. When I go to Advanced Search (Ctrl-Shift-F) and click "Show More Options" I would expect to see the following options in the "Return results containing:" drop-down list:
    Match Exact Word or Phrase
    Match Any of the Words
    Match All of the Words
    Boolean Query
    The only two that appear are "Match Exact Word or Phrase" and "Match Any of the Words." The remaining two are not in the list. Without "Boolean Query" I cannot perform regular expression searches which is very helpful in filtering irrelevant results, especially in documents thousands of pages long.
    Where are the other options?

    Well, thanks.
    Thought I had tried that, but went back and found it. So, Adobe assumes the only time I want/can/should perform a regular expression search is only when searching through and entire directory, and that there's no reason I should expect to do the same within a current document.
    IMHO, that is utterly ridiculous.

  • Advanced search web part issue

    hi,
     i am implementing a  advanced search web part , and in that  property restrictions, i have added  2  doument library columns [ not the site columns ]
    from my subsite in my site collection.
    but when i give some search keywords and perform   search, i am not able to get the search results in terms of documents/content.
    any extra settings do i need to do for performing advanced search
    1) Do i really need site columns to be created under the site collection , in order to be  searchable ?
    if i create a  simple document library column and cant i get it in the crawled properties section
    in the  central admin's search serv appln's  search schema section?
    pls advice

    As per my understanding you can crawl DL columns
    Can you get that document in search results page? Please check to see if the site which contains the library is included in content source.
    Could you please check site settings->Site Administration->Searchable columns, maybe the column is excluded?
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/b97a43b1-c727-4daa-a0d9-a18e53e09dd9/list-and-document-library-title-column-crawled-properties?forum=sharepointadminprevious
    Go to your Search Service Application in Central Administration.
        Click on Metadata Properties in the left navigation.
        Click on the Crawled Properties link.
        Click on the Categories link then select the SharePoint category
        Navigate the pages (next page arrow link) until you see ows_Title. Click on ows_Title.
        In the "Mappings to Metadata Properties" area of this page, ensure that the "Include values for this property in the search index" checkbox is checked, then Click OK. This checkbox is not checked by default.
        Repeat the same procedure above for your ows_Description crawled property to confirm that it is included in the index - which it should be by default.
        Start a Full Crawl 
    This will now include these crawled properties in the index and should now be available in the Managed Property which exposes them for Search.
    If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

  • New field in account advanced search

    Hello Experts,
    I'm facing issue where the new field is not showing up on the advanced search screen for account (CRMM_ACCOUNT).  The new field has been added to both search request and search result structure.  The logic has also been implemented to incorporate the new field into the search query. 
    When add this new field to the field group, the field displays on the 'Get' drop down box and I was able to search by this new field fine.  However, it doesn't get display on the advanced search screen.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    --Jamie.

    Hi Jamie,
    What i understand is the field has been added in Field Grp ACC_SEARCH_LOG_04 but its not showing up in Advanced Search right. I hope you should do this step i.e  Goto-> Layout Generation and Uncheck 'Only Check Fields Groups' from the checkbox and Enter the Field Grp in Field Grp field over there then execute it. Hope you can see the Custom field there.
    When you click Show advanced search you can see the 'Find Dropdownlist box ' select 'All Accounts' value from there and check whether your custom field is populating there or not.
    Thanks,
    Raju

  • KM folders as drop-down on advanced search

    HI All,
    When user hits the advanced search option, there is option of restricting search to folders and sub-folders.
    This is available in the folder structure. How can this be made to appear on a drop-down option. The user wants to have it in the same way as the sdn search options wherein the search can be restricted based on the dropdown of category/folders.
    Please advise.
    Thanks and regards,
    Arun

    Hi Arun,
    This is what SDN Advanced Search provides.
    Next to the Search term, it provides the option to select an index as a Dropdown choice. Below the search bar, it gives an option to filter the search result through a set of defined filter values like Product etc. This means that the content has been Meta Data tagged for the values represented by the check boxes.
    If you select a checkbox, then the result set displayed to you will be filtered according to that.
    What you basically need to do, is to define multiple indexes according to your needs and then define meta data properties which are assigned to each document / folder. This way you can achieve what you need.
    I hope this helps, if it does, then please award points in SDN.
    cheers,
    Shantanu

  • Basic Search & Advanced search in IdM

    Hi Experts,
    I was searching for one user on IdM UI, and I found that the basic search was not working (I only filled the Unique ID= userXYZ), but when I search for this userXYZ under advanced search, the user was found correctly.
    Did you get this behavior in your system, I mean the Basic search in not showing the same results as the Advanced?
    I am using IdM 7.2 SP7.
    Thank you very much for your comment,
    Victoria

    Hi Matt,
    The basic search work fine for other users.
    The problem here is that Basic Search can not find my inactive userXYZ only by entering his ID but when I choose Advanced Search and Inactive checkbox now I can find my inactive userXYZ.
    So why this inactive user can be shown only by using the combination of Advanced + Inactive checkbox ?
    Many thanks,
    Victoria

  • How does 'Does not contains' work in advanced search?

    I'm deploying a application based on JHeadsart and i am very enthusiastic about it! Thanks for the good work. I have a question about the 'Does not contains' search option in the advanced search/set by user mode.
    It looks i have to use wildcards which is not necessary with the contains option.
    Example:
    In the JHeadstart demo tutorial.
    I search on the lastname of employees with 'does not contain'.
    If i use does not contain 'A' i get 107 records
    If i use does not contain '%a%' i get 51 records
    If i do not enter any criteria i get 107 records.
    Is this the intended behavior?
    Thanks,
    Ruben Spekle

    Ruben,
    This is not intended behavior, you have found a bug!
    It turns out that we do set the wildcard usage in case of "does not contain", but we only interpret this wildcard usage if the operator is "like" (and we should also do this when the operator is "not like").
    We will fix it in the upcoming release. If you want to fix it before that, you should make a subclass of JhsApplicationModuleImpl and use that as the superclass of your application modules. In your Impl class, override advancedSearch(String, ArrayList, Boolean), and use instead of QueryAttribute your own subclass of QueryAttribute. In your subclass of QueryAttribute override getQueryValue to also apply the wildcardUsage when the operator is NOT LIKE.
    Thank you for bringing this bug to our attention!
    kind regards,
    Sandra Muller
    JHeadstart Team
    Oracle Consulting

  • Advanced Search: Viewing Results Issue

    This problem seems to only be on my Microsoft Surface Pro tablets with windows 8.1.
    When doing an advanced search within a document the results box is usually very large and you can see all the hits that came back. However, on my Surface when doing a search the results box is so small that you can't even see what's showing up.
    I've tried to enlarge the search box which slightly helps but still can only see one or two results at a time and must continue to use the scroll bar to get through them.
    I was curious if there was any options within Adobe that could be changed in order to get this view changed so its more user friendly and easier to work with?
    I've been through many of the options myself but was unable to find anything that worked.
    Thanks for the help.

    As per my understanding you can crawl DL columns
    Can you get that document in search results page? Please check to see if the site which contains the library is included in content source.
    Could you please check site settings->Site Administration->Searchable columns, maybe the column is excluded?
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/b97a43b1-c727-4daa-a0d9-a18e53e09dd9/list-and-document-library-title-column-crawled-properties?forum=sharepointadminprevious
    Go to your Search Service Application in Central Administration.
        Click on Metadata Properties in the left navigation.
        Click on the Crawled Properties link.
        Click on the Categories link then select the SharePoint category
        Navigate the pages (next page arrow link) until you see ows_Title. Click on ows_Title.
        In the "Mappings to Metadata Properties" area of this page, ensure that the "Include values for this property in the search index" checkbox is checked, then Click OK. This checkbox is not checked by default.
        Repeat the same procedure above for your ows_Description crawled property to confirm that it is included in the index - which it should be by default.
        Start a Full Crawl 
    This will now include these crawled properties in the index and should now be available in the Managed Property which exposes them for Search.
    If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

  • Advanced search based on term set

    I have a picture library where I use a term set to tag photos. The managed property is called owstaxIdCuisine.
    When I perform a keyword search using one term from the term set (e.g. "vegetarian"), I would expect the pictures tagged with this term to be on top of the results. However it is not the case.
    I have tried to include my managed property under "Add property restrictions" and enter the keyword there, but it doesn't seem to make any difference.
    When I use refiners on the search results, it works fine: if I click the "vegetarian" checkbox, then I get only the vegetarian pictures. However I'd like my users to get the correct results directly from the advanced search form.
    What am I missing?
    Christophe Humbert Path to SharePoint http://blog.PathToSharePoint.com User Managed Solutions http://UserManagedSolutions.com

    Hi Christophe,
    Have you checked if you could add the custom managed property in the advanced search form per the following article?
    http://waelmohamed.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/add-custom-search-properties-in-your-advanced-search-sharepoint-2010/
    Thanks
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Advanced Search Interception

    I've got an Advanced Search that I need to intercept and do some pre-processing of the
    search criteria before search executes.
    I'd first like to add a input field to the Advanced Search UI that is not part of the
    view object attached to the Advanced Search model. If the user submits search data in
    this "new" field, I'd like to intercept that input data and use it to execute a query
    programmatically against a different view object. The results of this query will then
    "auto-populate" one of the other fields in the Advance Search model.
    In my AppModuleImpl, I notice the following method in my JHS generated application:
    public void advancedSearch(String viewObjectUsage, ArrayList arguments)
    super.advancedSearch(viewObjectUsage, arguments);
    I know I can "intercept" the Advanced Search process at this point, have access to any
    search input data from the user via the ArrayList of QueryArguments, and since this is in my
    AppModule, I also have programmatic access to my other view object.
    I have two things I don't understand how to do:
    (1) Add a "new" input field to the searchBean from my UIX Advanced Search page, so that I can
    capture my "new" non-model search field.
    (2) Create and add a new QueryArgument programmatically and add it to the ArrayList before calling
    the super.advancedSearch(..) method. Specifically, the QueryArgument constructor takes some args
    that I'm not familiar with (since JHS I think typically does this behind the scenes). Once my
    "new" query field is added to the searchBean (from (1) above), I can use this data to execute a
    query against another view object programmatically, and the results from that query will feed a
    a new QueryArgument that I'd want to programmatically build and add to the ArrayList.
    Are there any examples or tutorials of how to do this?
    Thanks,
    Timothy

    Timothy,
    The easiest way to do this, is to add a transient attrbute to the VO to get the additional input field in your search area. This attribute should have the queryable checkbox, but does not match a column in the underlying VO table.
    When you generate your app, JHeadstart will then add a search field for this transient attribute, and it will create a QueryAttribute for it when you press Find button. Then, by overriding advancedSearch in your app module, you can get this QueryAttribute from the arraylist argument and do your preprocessing.
    Steven Davelaar,
    JHeadstart Team.

Maybe you are looking for