BPM : Workaround for SWWL transaction

Hi All
Am working on a BPM scenario...things work fine in a happy scenario...but once i get a error life becomes tough...even if the files sent after the error instance are all correct and its supposed to be a happy scenario , it gets stuck in the queue and everytime i have to go to transaction SWWL and delete it as well as the queues in SMQ2.
I was trying to figure out a way by which I can handle this in BPM itself...I tried using fork and in its exception branch having a control step assigned to CANCEL PROCESS but it doesn't solve my problem...
Kindly help me with some workaround for this...
Thanks in advance!!!

Yeah I have included the whole process in FORK itself and in exception branch kept CANCEL PROCESS .
But my point is something different here...
The exception branch is getting invoked and error is generated with a red flag in SXMB_MONI...but after that for proper messages also I get a waiting signal(Green Flag : Message scheduled for outbound process)...and unless I manually go to transaction SWWL and delete the instance teh files remain stuck in queue...once deleted in there everything works fine again...
Hope am clear...
I need a way where i need not go to SWWL atall and even if there's a error in one instance the subsequent instances should not wait for it to be cleared before getting processed...

Similar Messages

SSAS Tabular in DirectQuery - What are the workarounds for formula limitations?

Hello,
I need to create an SSAS Tabular model against the database of a live, real-time, line of business transactional system (i.e. a CRM).
The business requirement behind it is that we need to create some complex reports against live data, and our DW is only updated daily.
This live model will however be partitioned with a time-variance limitation (e.g. only records which are XX old can be returned).
Now here is the challenge. Since I am querying live data, then I believe the model must be configured in DirectQuery model. Am I right?
The issue is that DirectQuery mode is full of formula limitations. So my concern is, if I need a calculated column or measure that I cannot make it work due to DirectQuery limitations, then what are the alternatives?
Remember that the data source is from a live system, so it is not like I can create columns and measures in the underlying relational database.
Please advise.
Regards,
P.

Hi pmdci,
According to your description, you want to use some functions in calculated measure which are not supported in DirectQuery mode. Right?
In Analysis Services Tabular, since DirectQuery has the real time access and scalability, this comes with a price of restrictions on a number of DAX functions and missing Calculated Column feature. Generally the workaround for these scenarios
is replacing those functions with other functions which are supported in DirectQuery mode, or create columns in the data source. However, as you said, your environment is not possible to create columns in the database. And a lot of those limited
function are not replaceable, like time intelligence functions. So actually, there's no really effective workaround currently.
For you requirement, I suggest you submit Microsoft a feature request
at https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer
so that we can try to modify and expand the product features based on your needs.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou
TechNet Community Support

Change ITS parameter setings dynamically for one transaction iview

Hi gurus,
I have a configured ITS parameters and set ~webgui_simple_toolbar = 32
But now in one transaction, only on the last R3 screen (in this transaction) we need standard 'Back' button, (custom back button cannot be configured as this view is a pdf, t-code developed in ABAP )
I can configure 'Back' button by setting ~webgui_simple_toolbar = 40, but then it comes in all the transaction iviews and on all the screens.
Is it possible to set the value of ~webgui_simple_toolbar dynamically, in my t-code in ABAP, so that only for this transaction standard toolbar is visible.
thanks
Nishu

Hi Nishu,
Where exactly have you set the parameter
~webgui_simple_toolbar = 32
i.e in what Service? I believe from your description it is set in the WEBGUI service - which then all your transaction iViews are using to execute? Is this correct
One workaround would be to create an IAC for this one transaction that you are calling. Which would then have the settings
~transaciton <my_transaction>
~webgui_simple_toolbar = 40
~webgui 1
~singletransaction 1
Then setup the iView to be called as an IAC iView?
Regards,
Oisin

Authorization for a Transaction code

Hi,
In ECC 5.0, how can we get an authorization for a transaction code by debugging the code?
Actually in 4.6C, we used to debug the code & change SY-SUBRC code to '0' & get the authorization for a perticular transaction code.
Similarly how can we do this in ECC 5.0?
I tried, but I am not getting where to change the sy-subrc code to '0'.
Any help or clue is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Sarika.

Hi Sarika,
You can try out this workaround. In function module 'RS_TRANSACTION_TEST' put a breakpoint at statement ' call function 'AUTHORITY_CHECK_TCODE''. Execute the required transaction using tcode SE93.If you don't have the authorization then sy-subrc will be 4 after the above statement. In debugging mode change it to 0. Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Roshan Gujaran.

[SOLVED] Generating GUID from BPEL for outbound transactions

Hello all,
I am trying to generate a GUID for outbound transactions from BPEL. As documented in Generating GUID with ora:generateGUID() , the GUID generated by ora:generateGUID is a different format than is expected by the B2B server (37 vs 32 digits).
Is there any solution or workaround for this?
Kind regards,
John

User,
Thanks for the help. Just to clarify for everyone...
There are 2 GUID generators that you can access, one in the BPEL side that generates funny 37-digit GUID's, and one in the XSLT (as user pointed out) that generates a proper 32-digit GUID. (S)he is correct as well about the formatting using concat to format the GUID properly for B2B.
In addition, in case there are those of you out there who are not using XSLT, I found a reasonable Java-based GUID generator at http://javaexchange.com/aboutRandomGUID.html A simple modification to the "toString()" method to put the braces around the GUID makes it useful in this case also.
Regards,
John

Error connecting SQL Azure - Network access for Distributed Transaction Manager (MSDTC) has been disabled

Sometimes I have an error connecting SQL Azure. The error occurs in an asp.net application and in a windows service running on VM in Azure. Error details:
System.Data.Entity.Core.EntityException: The underlying provider failed on Open. ---> System.Transactions.TransactionManagerCommunicationException: Network access for Distributed Transaction Manager (MSDTC) has been disabled. Please enable DTC for network
access in the security configuration for MSDTC using the Component Services Administrative tool. ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: The transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions. (Exception from HRESULT:
0x8004D024)
 at System.Transactions.Oletx.IDtcProxyShimFactory.ReceiveTransaction(UInt32 propgationTokenSize, Byte[] propgationToken, IntPtr managedIdentifier, Guid& transactionIdentifier, OletxTransactionIsolationLevel& isolationLevel,
ITransactionShim& transactionShim)
 at System.Transactions.TransactionInterop.GetOletxTransactionFromTransmitterPropigationToken(Byte[] propagationToken)
 --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
 at System.Transactions.Oletx.OletxTransactionManager.ProxyException(COMException comException)
 at System.Transactions.TransactionInterop.GetOletxTransactionFromTransmitterPropigationToken(Byte[] propagationToken)
 at System.Transactions.TransactionStatePSPEOperation.PSPEPromote(InternalTransaction tx)
 at System.Transactions.TransactionStateDelegatedBase.EnterState(InternalTransaction tx)
 at System.Transactions.EnlistableStates.Promote(InternalTransaction tx)
 at System.Transactions.Transaction.Promote()
 at System.Transactions.TransactionInterop.ConvertToOletxTransaction(Transaction transaction)
 at System.Transactions.TransactionInterop.GetExportCookie(Transaction transaction, Byte[] whereabouts)
 at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.EnlistNonNull(Transaction tx)
 at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.PrepareConnection(DbConnection owningObject, DbConnectionInternal obj, Transaction transaction)
 at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.TryGetConnection(DbConnection owningObject, UInt32 waitForMultipleObjectsTimeout, Boolean allowCreate, Boolean onlyOneCheckConnection, DbConnectionOptions userOptions, DbConnectionInternal&
connection)
 at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.TryGetConnection(DbConnection owningObject, TaskCompletionSource`1 retry, DbConnectionOptions userOptions, DbConnectionInternal& connection)
 at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.TryGetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, TaskCompletionSource`1 retry, DbConnectionOptions userOptions, DbConnectionInternal oldConnection, DbConnectionInternal& connection)
 at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionInternal.TryOpenConnectionInternal(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory, TaskCompletionSource`1 retry, DbConnectionOptions userOptions)
 at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.TryOpenInner(TaskCompletionSource`1 retry)
 at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.TryOpen(TaskCompletionSource`1 retry)
 at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()
 at System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.DefaultSqlExecutionStrategy.<>c__DisplayClass1.<Execute>b__0()
 at System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.DefaultSqlExecutionStrategy.Execute[TResult](Func`1 operation)
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.EntityClient.EntityConnection.Open()
 --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.EntityClient.EntityConnection.Open()
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.EnsureConnection()
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteInTransaction[T](Func`1 func, IDbExecutionStrategy executionStrategy, Boolean startLocalTransaction, Boolean releaseConnectionOnSuccess)
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectQuery`1.<>c__DisplayClassb.<GetResults>b__9()
 at System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.DefaultSqlExecutionStrategy.Execute[TResult](Func`1 operation)
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectQuery`1.GetResults(Nullable`1 forMergeOption)
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.DataClasses.EntityReference`1.Load(MergeOption mergeOption)
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.DataClasses.RelatedEnd.DeferredLoad()
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.Internal.LazyLoadBehavior.LoadProperty[TItem](TItem propertyValue, String relationshipName, String targetRoleName, Boolean mustBeNull, Object wrapperObject)
 at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.Internal.LazyLoadBehavior.<>c__DisplayClass7`2.<GetInterceptorDelegate>b__2(TProxy proxy, TItem item)

Hello,
I am not an expert in MSDTC but as we know,SQL Azure Database does not support
distributed transactions. This means that SQL Azure doesn’t allow Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC) to delegate distributed transaction handling.
One common cause of MSDTC getting involved in Entity Framework applications is the fact that we close and reopen the same connection as needed (i.e. for each query that is executed).To avoid the stack from opening and closing the connection multiple times,
you can simply open the connection explicitly and run the queries in the same connectio.
The following thread is about a similar issue, please refer to:
http://answers.flyppdevportal.com/categories/azure/sqlazure.aspx?ID=d705a8cf-cba4-494c-96f6-96a136bd29e3
What's more, you can also try the workaround that involves setting the Enlist option of the SQL Azure connection to false. For the detail explanation, please refer to:Entity
FrameWork and SQL Azure
Regards,
Fanny Liu
Fanny Liu
TechNet Community Support

Extensions like Ghostery, WOT or AdBlock stop working after two or three times. Restarting the webpage in a new tab the extensions will work again for several times and then stop again. Has anybody an explanation or a workaround for this bug in Safari 5?

Extensions like Ghostery, WOT or AdBlock stop working after two or three times. Restarting the webpage in a new tab the extensions will work again for several times and then stop again. Has anybody an explanation or a workaround for this bug in Safari 5?

Remove the extensions, redownload Safari, reload the extensions.
http://www.apple.com/safari/download/
And if you really want a better experience, use Firefox, tons more choices and possibilities there.
Firefox's "NoScript" will block the Trojan going around on websites. Best web security you can get.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/
Ghostery, Ad Block Plus and thousands of add-ons more have originated on Firefox.

Error while running a BDC for the Transaction F-02

Hi,
 I'm getting an error "Parking not possible during Batch Input" while running a BDC for the transaction F-02.
 When i click on the error message it displays the message [b]"In Customizing, you can control whether an error message is issued."
 How to solve this issue?.
 Waiting for ur replies.........
Regards
N.Senthil

Hi,
When you are doing the recording in SHDB, and in the same screen where the TCODE to be recorded is given, there are options that you can choose called "Recording Parameters"...Select the checkbox which says "Not a Batch Input Session", this will set the sy-binpt variable to " "(in a recording by default it is "X")...and you will not get this error...
Also make sure while writing the BDC program to make use of the "bdc options" parameter which has this property to switch of sy-binpt...
 Refer below theard for sample bdc code for f-02.
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=5126766&messageID=1538409
Regards

Fields in read-only mode for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC6.0

Hello,
This is regarding the query for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC 6.0.
While creating BP / Changing BP system is disabling the fields in compnay code & sales area option. There is a SAP not provided 907860; and specified that the proplem is because of the delta customizing.
All the customization settings are as per the note. And the Synchronization Control is also activated. But still the fields are disabled only.
I have checked the field settings also in Cross-Application-Components & Logistic-Genral.
But these are not working for compnay code & sales area data.
please let me know if anyone has faced this type of problem / found any solution on this.
Best Regards,
Shubhada

SAP IMG -> Cross Application Components -> Master Data Synchronization  Synchronization Control -> Synchronization Control -> Activate Synchronization options
This setting allows you to activate synchronization of BP with R/3. Not maintaining the values may result in certain fields being read-only in BP.
Suggested Values:
Source Object: BP | Target Object: CUSTOMER | Active Indicator : X
Source Object: BP | Target Object: VENDOR | Active Indicator : X
Source Object: CUSTOMER | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
Source Object: VENDOR | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
Have you set all of the above settings??
BHARATH

WIP - Job Order Pending for Completion Transaction Reprt

How can we get report - job order pending for completion transaction from WIP module?
Please give us solution.
Thanks & Regards,
PressureJet Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Edited by: PressureJet Systems Pvt. Ltd. on Apr 7, 2013 9:57 PM

Can you elaborate your question more?
Mahendra

Error : Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 exci

I have Created Impot PO, After Planned Delivery cost MIRO I am trying to Perform GR then its giving Error "Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 excise group
Message no. 8I402"
I have already maintained GL account in "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction" for Excise group U1
This problem is coming when Additional Duty on custom condition type JADC is maintained in "Maintain Excise Defaults" node in the column "ADC Cond" . If I remove JADC condition type from this place the this error is not coming but AED column is not fetching any value while doing GR.
Please help me in this issue , still No answer
Edited by: shiwanshu singh on Jan 28, 2009 10:26 AM

Dear sir
For GRPO have you maintained sub transaction Type IP for your excise group U1. If you not maintained pl maintain . and assign G/L account to modvat clearing account , the G/l account should be same as company code CVD account.
Regards
jrp

Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and 58 Excise group

Hi Experts,
When i am doing Goods receipts for Depot for Subcontracting
i am getting this error message .Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and Excise group. For Depot no modvat. is there any configuration setting for depot. Please do needful.

Hi,
Please maintain
Hi,
go to SPRO
Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
SPROLogistics u2013 GeneralTax on Goods MovementsIndia Account Determination  Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Enter excise group -58
ETT_ GRPO
and G/L account
G.Ganesh Kumar

Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group

Dear Experts,
Iam raising this question after checking all the contents related to Sub Transaction type in SDN.
My prob is: for raw material sales scenario i have created order delivery and invoice. For Invoice i have done account determination with a different G/L in VKOA. Now i have to create an excise invoice and the accounting entry for central ED on sales should go to different G/L account. for account determination i have done the following settings:
Maintained Sub transaction type in
IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Basic Settings
->Maintain Sub Transaction types
IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India ->
Account determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction.
Here against DLFC sub transaction Type is maintained..
Also
IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Account determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Here maintained Excise group with DLFC Company Code subtransaction type, chart of accounts and all required GL Account .
But when the iam creating Excise Invoice in J1IIN and clicking on Subtransaction type-F4, no entries are shown. No values found is the message in green. Message no. DH801
If i use subtransaction type and enter billing document and enter, the following error message comes:
"Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group"
Iam unable to understand why the subtransaction type maintained is not showing in TCODE J1IIN?
Regards

For the error message DH801, please check note 840911
Excise modvat accounts not defined for
DLFC transaction and excise group"
Please check your G/L assignments "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction"
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and TS excise group

Hi Guys,
Suddenly we are facing issue during exicse invoice capturing with MIGO
system is giving following error
"Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and TS excise group
Message no. 8I402
While in Excise account assignment table CAPE is Linked to Modvat Clearing Account which is further liked to correct GL
Can any one explain the cause of this issue Points will be awarded
Regards,
Ashish

Hi
Pls maintain the following:
1. SPRO->Logistics General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
Pls note the Sub Tansaction type is IP for ETT CAPE.
ETT Sub Trn Type DC Ind Account Name
CAPE IP CR Credit ONHOLD CENVAT on hold account
CAPE IP DR Debit ONHOLD CENVAT on hold account
CAPE IP DR Debit RG23AED RG 23 AED account
CAPE IP DR Debit RG23BED RG 23 BED account
CAPE IP DR Debit RG23SED RG 23 SED account
CAPE IP DR Debit RG23ECS RG 23 ECS account
2. SPRO->Logistics General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Check the G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type CAPE and maintain the same G/L accounts for ETT CAPE with Sub Trn Type IP.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks

Error - Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and 01 exci

Dear All,
Getting below error while doing J1IIN - Posting Excise invoice for Sale.
"Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and 01 excise group"
I checked with the settings GL are assigned to for DLFC and 01 excise group.
Is anywhere else I need to mantain the modvat GL
Regards,
Rakesh

Check if you are using any subtransaction type along with excise transaction type.
Excise group, ETT, company code, sub transaction type (if any), Chart of account, Modvat account (pls maintain all the entries over here) search for modavat clearing field and maintain it.
BR
Edited by: Sujoy on Jan 15, 2010 9:45 AM

BPM : Workaround for SWWL transaction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for