Bug in paged results

I think there is a bug in paged search results.
After choosing a forum the forum Id is discarded when selecting other pages, either by "next page" link or by the page number link.

Ricardo,
Thank you for your note - I will pass on your observation to the OTN development team for investigation...
Thanks again - Andrew

Similar Messages

Cannot find paged results cookie

I have made an application, that works when accessing edirectory 8.8.2
(on a windows server, not that the platform matters I suppose).
I am able to do a paged ldap search, and my results are coming back to
me, nice and paged, like they are supposed to.
When I try the exact same code against a oes2sp1 with 8.8.4, I get
something like this (and only the first page of results)
(192.168.0.160:2151)(0x0003:0x63) controlPagedSetup: cannot find paged
results cookie
(192.168.0.160:2151)(0x0003:0x63) Sending operation result 53:"":"" to
connection 0x6804380
Why is the server saying that, and what does it mean? I don't recall
any possibility of setting cookies in the ldap api (actually an delphi
ldap control)

I have found the Paged Results Control to work:
http://ldapwiki.willeke.com/Wiki.jsp...deSortControls
Not sure about 8.8.4 or using Netware as all my attempts are 8.8.2 &
8.8.3 and on Linux/Unix.
Send me an email: jim at willeke com and we can try some things.
-jim
Nicolai Jensen wrote:
> I have made an application, that works when accessing edirectory 8.8.2
> (on a windows server, not that the platform matters I suppose).
> I am able to do a paged ldap search, and my results are coming back to
> me, nice and paged, like they are supposed to.
>
> When I try the exact same code against a oes2sp1 with 8.8.4, I get
> something like this (and only the first page of results)
>
> (192.168.0.160:2151)(0x0003:0x63) controlPagedSetup: cannot find paged
> results cookie
> (192.168.0.160:2151)(0x0003:0x63) Sending operation result 53:"":"" to
> connection 0x6804380
>
> Why is the server saying that, and what does it mean? I don't recall
> any possibility of setting cookies in the ldap api (actually an delphi
> ldap control)
>

Simple Paged Results Control

ODSEE has everything I need in a directory server.
One additional feature would make my day:
Simple Paged Results Control
We've got some pretty large containers on our directories, that not only cause the usual data warehouse type queries my developers like to do to fail (they keep bumping up against the entry return limit and allidsthreshold), but a real stressor on the directory server. I think I could convince them to use SPRC if it were available, as some of them have experience with Active Directory's implementation of it. Any chance we'll see this in future revs of ODSEE?

Hi,
You may want to consider Virtual List View (aka VLV Control) that provides result paging as well.
More info at [http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1507/fpypa?l=all&a=view|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1507/fpypa?l=all&a=view]
Sylvain

Is there a SUN Solaris ldapsearch utility supporting paged results?

Hellos..
We have Sun DS 5.2p4 on our servers.
I am using the ldapsearch executable which came with this install to read Users off an Active Directory.
BUT! Now the AD user base has grown beyond 1000 and I am getting Sizelimit exceeded errors.
I dont see any switches to allow me to set the client to read successive pages to get ALL results from AD.
Can anyone point me towards a Solaris 9 executable ldapsearch which supports paging!
I would be most grateful.
Thankyou.
GF

Ok babe...
There are 2 pieces that sort of fit together... the LDAP server and the LDAP client
I am painfully aware that the SUN Directory SERVER doesnt support paging.. and that the LDAP CLIENT provided by SUN named ldapsearch doesnt seem to have any switches or flags that allows it to get data as a series of 'pages' from LDAP SERVERS that actually DO support paging.
One of the LDAP SERVERS that DO support paged results is Active Directory.
My question is ... has anyone a Solaris LDAP CLIENT (I dont care what its called but ldapsearch is a good name) which allows paged results to be received from an Active Directory?
Has anyone experience of the openLDAP client does this beast support paging?
GF

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

ODBC BI Server Bug - arithmetic operation resulted in an overflow

I am trying to write some really simple .NET code access the Oracle BI Server ODBC driver and it's not working at all. I've connected fine, however it seems like anything I try to do related to getting database information spits up an error "arithmetic operation resulted in an overflow".
Here is the code:
Dim ConnectString As String
Dim FactoryType As String
Dim Factory As System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactory
Dim Connection As System.Data.Common.DbConnection = Nothing
Dim TablesData As System.Data.DataTable = Nothing
Dim err As String = ""
Dim nl As String = Chr(13) + Chr(10)
Try
    ' Connect to the database via ODBC
    ConnectString = "DSN=BSODBC_7;uid=TheUser10;pwd=************"
    FactoryType = "System.Data.Odbc"
    Factory = System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(FactoryType)
    Connection = Factory.CreateConnection
    Connection.ConnectionString = ConnectString
    Connection.Open()
    ' Request a list of tables from the database
    ' ** Tried both with restrictions and without
    ' ERROR on this line:
    ' “Arithmetic operation resulted in an overflow.”
    TablesData = Connection.GetSchema("Tables")
    ' Show the list of tables on the screen in a grid
    ' If it was successful.
    OnScreenGrid.AutoGenerateColumns = True
    OnScreenGrid.DataSource = TablesData
Catch ex As Exception
    ' Report the error
    err = ex.Message
    If Not (ex.InnerException Is Nothing) Then
        If Not (ex.InnerException.Message Is Nothing) Then
            err = err + nl + nl + ex.InnerException.Message
        End If
    End If
    MsgBox(err, MsgBoxStyle.OkOnly + MsgBoxStyle.Exclamation, "Error")
Finally
    ' Clean up and Close the DB Connection
    If Not (Connection Is Nothing) Then
        Connection.Close()
        Connection.Dispose()
        Connection = Nothing
    End If
End Try
Any Thoughts? Is this a known bug? Is there a fix?

I doubt on line
OnScreenGrid.DataSource = TablesData
instead of array as TablesData try to take List object and assign it to OnScreenGrid.DataSource
just in case check this
DataGridView.AutoGenerateColumns Property (System.Windows.Forms)
I might be wrong but just check it

Finder search bug? No results if 'Search' field is blank.

I can't determine if this is a bug or is simply a change in Finder search behavior (for the worse, IMO) in 10.8.
In the Finder, when I select 'File>>Find' (or hit ⌘-F) and then select the current folder from the top of the search parameters, no files appear in the search results if the 'Search' (for filename) field at the top of the window is blank even though the only other search parameter is 'Kind is Any'.
If I enter text in the 'Search' field, matching results start to appear.
In 10.7, I saw different behavior. In the absence of text in the Search field, the Finder would simply return results matching the other parameters and ignore the Search field.
With the new behavior, there doesn't seem to be any way to construct a saved search based solely on other parameters (kind, date, file label, etc) without specifying some filename parameter as well. Of course, I can work around the problem by using something like 'NOT xxx!@#$%' in the Search field, but this approach is klugy at best.
Anyone else see this? Bug? Deliberate change in Finder behavior?

Yes the report ESH_TEST_SEARCH returns no material.
So should I suspend the indexing and reschedule with with real time indexing ? I am not sure whether we choose real time indexing in the first time.
What about the authorizations, I see USER_AUTHORITY object is activealready.
Thanks

Bug 2679062 - Wrong results possible from multi-column INLIST - though stat

Hi,
The following test case is supplied in the metalink in bug no. 2871341, the base bug for this bug is 2679062.
REPRODUCIBILITY:
Reproduces constantly with simple test case below:
TEST CASE:
DROP TABLE A1
CREATE TABLE A1 (X1 VARCHAR2(10), X2 VARCHAR2(10))
REM *********** Create the second table: ***************
DROP TABLE A2
CREATE TABLE A2 (X1 VARCHAR2(10), X2 VARCHAR2(10))
INSERT INTO A1 VALUES ('1','2');
INSERT INTO A2 VALUES ('3','4');
COMMIT;
CREATE INDEX A1_X1 ON A1(X1 );
CREATE INDEX A1_X2 ON A1(X2);
CREATE INDEX A2_X1 ON A2(X1);
CREATE INDEX A2_X2 ON A2(X2);
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW A_ALL AS SELECT * FROM A1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM A2;
ANALYZE TABLE A1 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
ANALYZE TABLE A2 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
SELECT * FROM A_ALL;
SELECT * FROM A_ALL WHERE (X1='1' AND X2='2') ;
SELECT * FROM A_ALL WHERE ((X1='1' AND X2='2') OR (X1='3' AND X2='4'));
The 2nd query returns answer while the second is not !
The following is published in the 9.2.0.4 fixed bug list:
" 9204 - 2679062 - Wrong results possible from multi-column INLIST "
I have installed 9.2.0.4 patch set on a win 2000 machine Oracle and saw that the above case is actually solved but our application which has a very similar case doesn't.
After investigating I found the following test case that fails, it reproduces only when you have index on all columns (covering index):
drop table t1_1;
drop table t1_2;
create table t1_1(c1 number, c2 number, c3 number);
create table t1_2(c1 number, c2 number, c3 number);
create index t1_1_ix on t1_1(c1, c2, c3);
create index t1_2_ix on t1_2(c1, c2, c3);
create or replace view t1 as select * from t1_1 union all select * from t1_2;
insert into t1_1 values(1, 2, 100);
insert into t1_2 values(1, 2, 200);
commit;
analyze table t1_1 compute statistics;
analyze table t1_2 compute statistics;
prompt
prompt #######################################
prompt try 1 - works fine
prompt #######################################
prompt
select * from t1
where
(c1=1)
and
( (c2=2) and (c3=100)
prompt
prompt #######################################
prompt try 2 - works fine
prompt #######################################
prompt
select * from t1
where
(c1=1)
and
(c2=2) and (c3=200)
prompt
prompt #######################################
prompt try 3 - try 1 OR try 2 does not work !
prompt #######################################
prompt
select * from t1
where
(c1=1)
and
( ( (c2=2) and (c3=100) )
or
( (c2=2) and (c3=200) )
opened a TAR and wanted to share with you.
Tal Olier ([email protected]).

Hi,
The following test case is supplied in the metalink in bug no. 2871341, the base bug for this bug is 2679062.
REPRODUCIBILITY:
Reproduces constantly with simple test case below:
TEST CASE:
DROP TABLE A1
CREATE TABLE A1 (X1 VARCHAR2(10), X2 VARCHAR2(10))
REM *********** Create the second table: ***************
DROP TABLE A2
CREATE TABLE A2 (X1 VARCHAR2(10), X2 VARCHAR2(10))
INSERT INTO A1 VALUES ('1','2');
INSERT INTO A2 VALUES ('3','4');
COMMIT;
CREATE INDEX A1_X1 ON A1(X1 );
CREATE INDEX A1_X2 ON A1(X2);
CREATE INDEX A2_X1 ON A2(X1);
CREATE INDEX A2_X2 ON A2(X2);
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW A_ALL AS SELECT * FROM A1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM A2;
ANALYZE TABLE A1 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
ANALYZE TABLE A2 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
SELECT * FROM A_ALL;
SELECT * FROM A_ALL WHERE (X1='1' AND X2='2') ;
SELECT * FROM A_ALL WHERE ((X1='1' AND X2='2') OR (X1='3' AND X2='4'));
The 2nd query returns answer while the second is not !
The following is published in the 9.2.0.4 fixed bug list:
" 9204 - 2679062 - Wrong results possible from multi-column INLIST "
I have installed 9.2.0.4 patch set on a win 2000 machine Oracle and saw that the above case is actually solved but our application which has a very similar case doesn't.
After investigating I found the following test case that fails, it reproduces only when you have index on all columns (covering index):
drop table t1_1;
drop table t1_2;
create table t1_1(c1 number, c2 number, c3 number);
create table t1_2(c1 number, c2 number, c3 number);
create index t1_1_ix on t1_1(c1, c2, c3);
create index t1_2_ix on t1_2(c1, c2, c3);
create or replace view t1 as select * from t1_1 union all select * from t1_2;
insert into t1_1 values(1, 2, 100);
insert into t1_2 values(1, 2, 200);
commit;
analyze table t1_1 compute statistics;
analyze table t1_2 compute statistics;
prompt
prompt #######################################
prompt try 1 - works fine
prompt #######################################
prompt
select * from t1
where
(c1=1)
and
( (c2=2) and (c3=100)
prompt
prompt #######################################
prompt try 2 - works fine
prompt #######################################
prompt
select * from t1
where
(c1=1)
and
(c2=2) and (c3=200)
prompt
prompt #######################################
prompt try 3 - try 1 OR try 2 does not work !
prompt #######################################
prompt
select * from t1
where
(c1=1)
and
( ( (c2=2) and (c3=100) )
or
( (c2=2) and (c3=200) )
opened a TAR and wanted to share with you.
Tal Olier ([email protected]).

Paging results on PHP/Oracle

Does anybody have a clean code they can share about paging query resultset on PHP using OCI (not ADO or something else)???
I've tried some posted here but the results is not encouraging ...

Look at
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:12499734965902645361::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:127412348064
A working example in SQL*Plus:
arc@sles> var nrows number;
arc@sles> var offset number;
arc@sles> exec :nrows := 3;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
arc@sles> exec :offset := 5;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
arc@sles> select rowno,empno,ename from
2 (select rownum as rowno,empno,ename from
3 (select * from scott.emp order by empno)
4 where rownum <= :offset + :nrows)
5 where rowno >:offset;
ROWNO EMPNO ENAME
6 7654 MARTIN
7 7658 CHAN
8 7698 BLAKE
The same in PHP could like something:
$stmt = OCIParse($conn,"select rowno,empno,ename from
(select rownum as rowno,empno,ename from
(select * from scott.emp order by empno)
where rownum <= :offset + :nrows)
where rowno >:offset");
OCIBindByName($stmt,":nrows",$nrows,10);
OCIBindByName($stmt,":offset",$offset,10); ...

Scroll bug in search result in contacts

Got a bug in contacts when search result need to scroll (more than 10 results) cant choose last result contact. Its scroll away every time you trying to scroll it.

I'd similar problems.
The search option didn't find many massages I posted.
Searching for JClient gives just a single item !!!!
What's wrong ?
TIA
Tullio

Paging results from openSearch source

Hi
I have created a result source and connected it to an aspx page that I have created which gets a search phrase as parameter and renders results in OpenSearch 1.1 protocol.
Im displaying the results in a search center with OOTB search webparts.
Basically everything works ok besides 2 things:
1. The search results paging doesnt work. when I click on a page in the paging links i can see the request arrives to my aspx page but no indication for the requested page is shown
2. The search results from the result source i have created are halted if it takes more than 15 seconds to render the results, is there any way to change this interval? from the log i can see its a webrequest timeout but couldnt find the place to modify
it.
Thanks in advance,
Yuval

I'm not sure about paging, but it doesn't look like the Core Results Web Part allows you to set the timeout limit. If you were returning the results via code, you could use the following property:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.office.server.search.query.querymanager.timeout(v=office.15).aspx?cs-save-lang=1&cs-lang=csharp#code-snippet-1
Dimitri Ayrapetov (MCSE: SharePoint)

Bug: the query results dialog extends outside the screen boundaries

Hi, I observed this bug on MacOS 10.5.5 running Eclipse 3.4.1 with FlexBuilder 3.0.2 installed. Steps to repro:
1. make FlexBuilder full screen
2. open an MXML document
3. make the editor full screen (double-click the editor's tab)
4. select in the text editor the name of a Flex SDK class (e.g. Window, Button, ...)
5. scroll the editor window so that the selected text is near the bottom of the screen
5. click the Blueprint button, or type ctrl-B
Result: the Blueprint query results window is only partly visible, most of it is below the bottom of the screen
Expected: the query results window auto-positions itself to be fully visible

Thanks for trying out Blueprint and giving us feedback!
We have filed a ticket for this bug and will do our best to address it in the next release!
Mira Dontcheva
Research Scientist
Adobe Systems

Javascript in 'Execute when page loads', not working when paging results grid

I have some Javascript in an Apex page, running in 'Execute when page loads'. It does some stuff to a results grid. It works fine on page load, but then doesn't run when I page through, or sort the grid. I presume this is because the grid is being sorted / paged using Ajax, which means the page isn't being fully loaded.
Is there anywhere else I can put the code so it gets applied to the grid on sorts and paging?

Thanks, works perfectly! I used the After Refresh and just selected the region I wanted to trigger the Javascript, and it works great. As you say the scope needs to be Dynamic.
For anyone else reading this, something which caught me out was that my reports region was using the No Template setting, and the Dynamic Action didn't work, as it requires you to use a template which contains #REGION_STATIC_ID# - which is used by the dynamic action to identify the region. Once I switched to using a template, it worked fine.

Display bug in iTunes Results

Hi everybody,
I have the latest version of iTunes and the last few days I have a bug in the display of results when I search in iTunes.
Here the result: http://www.picdo.net/fichiers/2010/7/7/0afdf91a-90d8-491d-8d9a-b4876b8560dd_Capt ure-decran-2010-07-07-a-220912.png
Have you an idea? Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Olivier Morel

Note : I tried uninstalling iTunes completely (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1224) and reinstalled but the problem still exists.
Ideas? Thanks.

LOV Bug with rendering result?

Hey,
I'm attempting to create a basic LOV using either the "ADF LOV Input" or "ADF LOV Choice List" components.
When I try to use these components with a small set of data they behave as one would expect, however I run into some odd behavior when the list behind the LOV is large and the component is required to fetch additional rows of data as the user scrolls through the options.
With the LOV Input, as I scroll through the data it is retrieved fine, however when I select a value from the bottom half of the list, the component on the page does not update with the selected value and the console in JDeveloper throws the following [truncated] stack trace:
SEVERE: Server Exception during PPR, #1
java.lang.NullPointerException
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.model.binding.RowDataManager.getRowIndex(RowDataManager.java:171)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.model.binding.FacesCtrlHierBinding$FacesModel.getRowIndex(FacesCtrlHierBinding.java:417)
     at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXIterator._fixupFirst(UIXIterator.java:310)
     at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXIterator.__encodeBegin(UIXIterator.java:297)
     at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXCollection.encodeBegin(UIXCollection.java:517)
     at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.render.CoreRenderer.encodeChild(CoreRenderer.java:271)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.SimpleInputListOfValuesRendererBase$ListOfValuesDialogRenderer.encodeContent(SimpleInputListOfValuesRendererBase.java:598)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.PanelWindowRenderer.encodeAll(PanelWindowRenderer.java:190)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.DialogRenderer.encodeAll(DialogRenderer.java:135)
     at oracle.adf.view.rich.render.RichRenderer.delegateRenderer(RichRenderer.java:846)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.SimpleInputListOfValuesRendererBase$ListOfValuesPopupRenderer.encodeAllChildren(SimpleInputListOfValuesRendererBase.java:634)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.PopupRenderer.encodeAll(PopupRenderer.java:225)
     at oracle.adf.view.rich.render.RichRenderer.encodeAll(RichRenderer.java:815)
     at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.render.CoreRenderer.encodeEnd(CoreRenderer.java:208)
     at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.encodeEnd(UIXComponentBase.java:733)
It looks as though the View Object on the back-end is getting populated with the correct value selected from the list (I have a second, cascaded LOV built off the value selected which is populating with the correct data) however the front-end is not getting populated with the correct data.
With the second LOV component (ADF LOV Choice List) I am completely unable to scroll through the list of values; the component hangs as soon as it attempts to fetch any more data and throws the following [truncated] stack trace in the JDeveloper console:
SEVERE: Server Exception during PPR, #2
java.lang.NullPointerException
     at oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUCtrlListBinding$JUCtrlListBindingItemRef.get(JUCtrlListBinding.java:3006)
     at javax.el.MapELResolver.getValue(MapELResolver.java:164)
     at javax.el.CompositeELResolver.getValue(CompositeELResolver.java:143)
     at com.sun.faces.el.FacesCompositeELResolver.getValue(FacesCompositeELResolver.java:64)
     at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.getValue(AstValue.java:117)
     at com.sun.el.ValueExpressionImpl.getValue(ValueExpressionImpl.java:192)
     at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.bean.FacesBeanImpl.getProperty(FacesBeanImpl.java:70)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.ValueRenderer.getValue(ValueRenderer.java:170)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.ValueRenderer.getConvertedString(ValueRenderer.java:129)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.OutputTextRenderer.encodeAll(OutputTextRenderer.java:105)
     at oracle.adf.view.rich.render.RichRenderer.encodeAll(RichRenderer.java:815)
     at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.render.CoreRenderer.encodeEnd(CoreRenderer.java:208)
If this is indeed a bug with the ADF components themselves attempting to lazy-load the values in the list, is there a way to force the component to simply load the entire list up-front instead of as the user scrolls? This would be an acceptable workaround for my application.
For the record, the View this page is based off runs flawlessly in the BC tester. Also, incase this helps any, the LOV is not based on any sort of Fk link / association. It is built upon accessor attributes (and bind variables and view criteria in the case of the mentioned cascading LOV).
Thanks in advance for the help,
Chris

Chris,
can you provide instructions how to reproduce this based on the HR schema (e.g. Departments/Employees table). If its easier for you to create a testcase, please send it to frank. /nimphius /@ oracle.com (please remove blanks and slashes) in a zip file, where you rename the "zip "extension to "unzip"
Frank

Bug in paged results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for