Business Area is not inheriting from Org.Unit or Cost Centre

Hi
Business area is assigned to Org.unit in IT1008, when I executing the action business area is not defaulting / Inheriting from Org.Management.
Any one could help me to solve this issue.
Thank you.
Bachi

It seems OM and PA are not integrated, are they?
RHINTE20  is the report can bring data from OM to PA.

Similar Messages

  • Cost Center Inheritance from Org Unit

    Good day all,
    Can someone please advise regarding cost center inheritance from org units?
    I understand the inheritance concept, however simple need to know if the CCenter is added to the org unit via A011 relationship, does the system physically create a A011 relationship on the position inhertiting the cost center from the org or does the system simply pick up the realtionship from the org unit relationsip for use in IT0001 field KOSTL (cost center)?
    Thanks guys, have a lovely day!
    Christy

    Hi Christy,
    As we know cost centre(K) is an unusual object in OM.Two type of objects internal  whose master record are in database table beloging to sap erp hcm and eexternal object whose master data belong to other application areas.Cost centre is an external object that is used to represent origin of costs.Inheritance concept is on the basis of whoch cost centre are assigned in org plan.
    directly related cost centre is called master cost centre and they are made via A011 cost centre assignment relationsip.they can be made at org unit,position or work centre and nornmally its org unit that common.Org unit at the top are asisgned the cost centre as a best practise so that all the org units below or reporting will inherit the same.
    Similarly multiple cost centre assignments can also e made through 1018 infotype(cost centre distribution).Inheritance also applied to them aswell.
    Hope this helps.
    No Worries
    KG

  • Error while asssignment of Org unit  to cost centre.

    HI  Frdz,
    When I am traying to assign org unit to cost centre I got this error CALL_METHOD_NOT_IMPLEMENTED.
    Experts pls let me know  how to solve this error.
    I maintained A\001 relation for cited above.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Narayana Kaja

    Check the table T77S0
    When you create relationships between cost centers and positions or
    organizational units in Organizational Management, the system requires
    that the cost center is assigned to a controlling area, as a cost center
    must always be assigned to a particular controlling area. In this case,
    the value of this entry will be used as the default for the controlling
    area.
    Let me know if you need more information.
    Thanks,
    Kiran.
    Reward points are appreciated.

  • Business Partner number not assigned to ORG unit

    hello colleagues,
    I cretaed an Org Unit at the highest level, i have assigned Basic data, address data and i have assigned  function and attribute, but when i save the Org unit,I am not getting the BP number,
    can anyone tell me what could be reaosn for this, but normally whenever a new org unit is created
    a BP has to be assigned to it right
    please help me with this problem
    regards
    chandu

    Hi Chandu,
    To create a bp number & relationship for org unit follow the below process
    ==> SPRO
    ==> Customer Relationship Management
    ==> Master data
    ==> Business Partner
    ==> Integration Business Partner-Organization Management
    ==> Create Business Partner Initially
    Click on Organisational Unit(s) and provide the input as 'ID' of the ORG and Execute
    Click on the line and right click and select 'Start Repair'
    If Bp is already existing, u wnat to build only relation ship follow the below process.
    ==> Use Tcode SE37
    ==> Use functional module as 'HR_OBJECTBUPA_INSERT' and Execute
    ==> Click on the value button and enter OT as 'O', OBJID as ID of the org BUPAGUID as
    Businesspartner GUID and Execute
    Regards,
    PePe

  • Org Unit and Cost Center not displaying in 0001 with A012 relationship

    Hi Guru's,
    Kindly help me in this regard ,
    Whenever i hire a person to a position which has an A012 relationship (Chief Position) then Org Units and Cost centres are not getting displayed in IT0001 .
    But when i hire a person in the same org unit with A003 relationship ; both Org units and Costcentres are getting displayed
    I have used an LSMW for uploading relationships and objects and i have also run integration reports for the same but still i am not able to display org unit and cost centre in it0001 when i hire a person with A012 relationship .
    Kindly Help

    both great advice, also, check this link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/14/d22fe48435d111950d0060b03c6b76/content.htm
    within this information there are various reports to run, which help recon OM and PA integration.  it will help you find your data problem and then fix the data for you if you follow step by step.
    best regards,
    michael

  • Business Area Field not Update in VF02 for output tex

    Hello All,
    in vf02 transaction the business area is not populating in case of output tex,i already search the relavent document in sdn but its not working,i impliment the exit userexit EXIT_SAPLV60B_006 (member of enhancement SDVFX006). as referance of http://scn.sap.com/thread/3146034,but my exit is not at all triger i check all the things like the project is already activated and i also thing that we need to fiel the bseg-table for tha i wrote the code also, as refer to
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3164333,please suggest to resolve this issue. in  note SAP Note 199886 it say its a stnd.behv .
    THANKS,
    Sam

    Hi,
      iam not sure how it can be checked but in FS00 you can compare both GL Accounts at - control in chart of accounts whether it is p& l account or Balance sheet account
    also check the field status group
    if you can compare both GL accounts you will get the answer
    If you are doing sales  order check whether the Business area is appaering in the order
    iam sorry business area does not come from material master,profit centre comes from material master

  • Changing personnel area/subarea (IT1008) from org unit to position

    We are live with PA and Org. Mgmt, but have been advised to change the infotype 1008 data - personnel area and subarea to be stored on the position instead of the org unit (where we have it now).  A big reason for this is we have cases when we need to overwrite the personnel subarea at the position level.  For example, a position belonging to an org unit with subarea ABCD, may really be in subarea WXYZ.  Therefore, even though the org unit is ABCD, it will be overwritten at the position level to WXYZ.  My understanding is that the RHINTE30 program will not work approrpiately if we are maintaining the data this way. 
    In transaction PPOME there is an account assignment tab on the org unit with cost center (filled in) and personnel area/subarea (which will be blank moving forward since that data won't be maintained on the org unit).  Then, there is also an account assignment tab on the position with cost center inherited from the org unit (sometimes needing to be overwritten at the position level), and the personnel area/subarea data.  My question is how should I handle the view of PPOME for this data?  Can I hide the personnel area and subarea on the account assignment tab for the org units only so it is not confusing for the users?  The problem with having it this way is that personnel area and subarea are blank on the org unit and filled on on the position.  They are conflicting and both visable/maintainable to the User.  Any advise please?  Thanks!

    Hi Nish,
    I gave you my input on your other related message and now will go for this one.
    As I commented on the other message, RHINTE30 will not integrate infotypes 1008 and 1013. So you don't have to worry about using this functionality (first part of your message).
    On the second part (personnel area / subarea on position rather than org unit): there are some considerations here that are more functional / process driven than technical. From a technical point of view, everything can be done. You can hide data from infotype 1008 on the tabstrip for your org. unit using dynpro handling, even via customizing. You can even transfer the data from infotype 1008 on the org. units to the positions or delimit it on the org units. There are some quite easy ways of achieving this using the LMSW tool (have you used it? I can forward some documentation).
    But personally, I would not recommend to do this from a process point of view. Everything in SAP HR is about the inheritance concept, and I think this works very well when it comes to org. units and positions. It is normally advisable to record personnel area / subarea on the org. unit level. This will be inherited by positions (even if you cannot see it at position level in PPOME) and thus defaulted for the employee. At position level you should handle only the exceptions, which will be in turn also defaulted for the employee holding the position. In this way, data maintenance is minimized. If you delete (or do not use from now on) information about infotype 1008 on org. unit level, your HR department will have to maintain this every time a position is created, and even in cases in which a position is shifted from one org. unit to another one.
    In my opinion, you should address this with your HR department and explain the concept and the consequences of maintaining all at position level. It would only be advisable to do it if the org. unit structure is very cross-personnel areas and subareas. If it is a matter of handling exceptions, again, I would recommend to continue recording this data at org. unit level. All in all, if the data is not recorded on the position and you need to see which is its personnel area, you just need to double-click on the org. unit above.
    Just wanted to let you know my opinion, of course it's your decision. By the way, I'm of course not aware of other possible implications like home-developed reporting and so on.
    Regards,
    Rodrigo

  • Business area is not being specified in cost center master.

    Hello Professional friends,
    When i specify Business area in existing cost center master data, it appears an error massage -    "Field change Business Area is not possible (transaction data already exists)"
    I tried to change the validity by analysis Period, when i do this, it appears anothe error " No further processing (contact your system administrator)"
    Its user critical requirement that he want to specify business for all new and existing cost center.
    there is no problem with new cost center.
    Waiting for valuable suggestion.

    Hello,
    The rule is that if you make any actual or planned date within the current year, you cannot make any changes to any of the organizational units within the cost center master.
    From the next year, you can remove / change the business are within the cost center master, provided:
    You have to change the validity period of the cost center master by doing:
    Go to KS02
    Edit ==> Analysis Period
    put your cursor on the valid from e.g. 01.01.1900 and click F5 (the line gets selected and become blue)
    Click on Other Analysis period and then change the analysis period. The new analysis period must be starting with the first date of the next fiscal year.
    Now change or remove the business area.
    For this year, surely you cannot change the business area, since there postings.
    Do not try to write any ABAP program to change the standard in order avoid the business area change error, it would end up data inconsistencies.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • FM to Delete Position and Central person from org unit?

    Hi
    In SRM, we used tr-cd USERS_GEN to create position/CP using SU01 user.
    In transaction PPOMA_BBP we can see Org unit assigned to position(S) and Central person(CP).
    How to unassign or delete the Position and Central person from org unit?
    Can you pls tell me any Func Module available.?
    Regards
    Chandra
    Edited by: princeck on Mar 10, 2011 2:54 AM

    Hi
    HR_CENTRALPERSON_DELETE  is working fine.
    Can you tell me how to delete position from Org unit. I want to delete it using FM or program.
    How to execute this program BUPA_TEST_DELETE?
    I gave Business partner as input, but it does not delete...anything. pls guide how to exeute.
    Any FM available.
    Regards
    Chandra

  • Obtain users from Org Unit.

    Hi all,
    Which tables I must know to obtain all users (purchasers) from Org unit?
    I can't use a FM. I need to obtain this data from R3, not SRM.
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    David.

    Hi. All links are in table HRP1001. You will have to go back to this table many times.
    Firstly you can get all the positions under the org unit from HRP1001, then you will have to go back to HRP1001 with the position numbers to get the person numbers and so on.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • SLMANAGER from org unit..

    Hi,
      is there any way to get all SLAPPROVER from org unit based on the user name. there is an attribute 'SLApproverList' in BUS4101 , when i given input as user name an instance , the above attribute get filled those who are all SLAPPROVER for that user.
      now i have to implement the same logic from Badi. from Badi i will pass creater name and i need all SLAPPROVER list, this is my requirement. can you please give me some hints for this.
    how to get SLAPPROVER from Badi.
    regards,
    john.

    Hi John,
    Sorry for delayed reply.
    To get SLAPPROVER from BADI. Try this -
    DATA : l_bus4101 TYPE swf_bor_object.
    DATA : l_limit   TYPE bbp_spers_sl-spending_limit.
    DATA : l_approver TYPE swf_bor_object.
    swc_get_property l_bus4101 'SLAPPROVER' l_approver.
    swc_get_property l_bus4101 'SpendingLimit' l_limit.
    It should be alright now. Please go through documentation on business objects and check SWC_GET_PROPERTY / SWC_SET_ELEMENT / SWC_CREATE_CONTAINER etc.
    If you get error with l_approver, please check correct type for it.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards.
    Pras

  • Business Area is not visible

    I have Discoverer 10g 9.0.4. The EUL is visible by a couple of accounts. Of the accounts that can see the Business Area, I can revoke the BA and it disappears from the user. I can then grant it back to the user and it is visible again.
    With a new database account with the same database permissions as the other accounts, the business area is not visible. I can log in with one of the "bad" accounts I can see the EUL5 tables. I can see that in EUL5_ACCESS_PRIVS and EUL5_EUL_USERS these accounts should be able to see the business area but no matter what I do in Admin, nothing is visible. What am I missing?
    I've even tried granting select on all EUL5 tables to public but that did nothing. I tried granting administrator access to these accounts but that didn't make the BA visible either.
    I tried another desktop with Discoverer Administrator installed and tried granting/revoking access to these accounts but that didn't help either.
    HELP! :)

    I did the following as a test:
    create user test_disco identified by test_disco default tablespace tools temporary tablespace temp;
    grant connect to test_disco;
    grant dba to test_disco;
    -- Next, use Discoverer Administrator and grant access to the BA
    -- Next logon as TEST_DISCO and run the select statement:
    select b.ba_name
    from EULOWNER.eul5_eul_users u,
    EULOWNER.eul5_bas b,
    EULOWNER.eul5_access_privs p
    where u.eu_id = p.ap_eu_id
    and b.ba_id = p.gba_ba_id
    and u.eu_username = user
    -- one row returned
    -- Next, connect with Discoverer Desktop or Discoverer Plus as TEST_DISCO and unable to see any Business Areas.
    What is going on?

  • Business Area is not  pulling for Balance Sheet Accounts

    Hi,
    For few Balance Sheet GL Accounts (From MM side), Business area is not pulling while doing MM Cycle. For other Balance Sheet GL Accounts (From MM side), system is pulling the Business area by default.
    I have checked all the Field Status Group configuration and all. Still could not find the route cause for this. Can any one help me why it is not pulling Business area for Balance sheet accounts when doing MM cycle.
    what should i do if system has to pull Business area for Inventory Related Balance sheet GL Accounts?
    Kindly Help me..
    Thanks
    Sunil

    Hi,
    in OMJ7, assignement were there properly. Still why i am not able to pull Business area for  Balance Sheet Accounts.
    I Can give one Clue: For Inventory Finished Goods, system is pulling Business area and for Inventory Raw material and Inventory Semi-Finished Goods system is not pulling the Business area.
    This is my problem...
    Thanks
    Sunil

  • Earmarked funds during goods receipt (GR) is not inherited from PO.

    Hi, Everybody u2026
    We are using Earmarked Funds relevant for FM updating, but, during goods receipt (GR) and invoice receipt (IR) it is not inherited from purchase order (PO).
    In ME21N the account assignment is F and the system ask us to enter the GL Account, Order and additional the Earmarked Funds. The system is deriving correctly the fund, the funds center and the commitment item from those entered in the Earmarked Funds.
    However, during goods receipt and invoice receipt, the Earmarked Funds is not inherited from purchase order (PO) besides the others account assignments (order, fund, funds center and commitment item ) in the coding block.
    Best regards,
    Thanks

    Hello,
    I will provide some hints:
    - If it is a service PO, please check the Note 972276 (Service Purchase orders only).
    - If the posting is related to Asset, please kindly check:
        a. Note 684659
        b. Check if you have a derivation rule in FMDERIVE with the function module FMDT_READ_MD_ASSET.
        c. Check in your FI-AA customizing if you have activated the account
          assignment element but you have not specified an account assignment type for
          account assignment object for APC balance sheet postings (see note 684659 for
          details).
    I hope it helps
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • Business Area is not getting updated in "Main Bank Account" Line item (FF_5

    Hi Gurus,
    I am executing T Code: FF_5 for uploading the "Multi-Cash" Format. This transaction clears the Bank Clearing Account and post the entry to the credit of "Bank Main Account".
    Now while i had executed F110, the Business area was properly captured in the Bank Clearing Account Line item. But while executing FF_5, the Business Area is not getting captured against the "Main Bank Account" Line item.
    Can you please tell me how to capture the Business Area against the "Main Bank Account" Line item.
    Rgds,
    Prasad.

    Hi,
    1. In case of Business where payments are made centrally it is important to report
        Bank A/c Business area wise.
    2. However I have solved the problem by doing "Sustitution", and its working fine. The Business Area is getting updated against the Main Bank Account Line item.
    3. I am however getting one error while doing the upload in FF_5. The error occurs
       only if Business Area is a "required" field in Bank Account's "Field Status
       Group".
       Error: (00 298) Formatting error in the field COBL-GSBER ; see next message.
       But if I make Business Area as an Optional Field I am not getting an error and
       also the posting is done to Main Bank Account.
    Is there anyother method by which this error can be corrected.
    I have assigned 2 points for your inputs. Can you help me to solve this error as well.
    Rgds
    Prasad

Maybe you are looking for