Business rule, runtime prompt problem

Hi Gurus,
We have one business rule which contain run time prompt where global variable assigned to it, when I run the rule form workspace I would able see all numbers from prompt window
But when I run the same from Excel Smartview, I couldn't able to find all members from prompt windows.
I was wondering what would be the cause?
Thnx.

Hi Amit,
The person running the rule will need to have read access to both cost centers in order to transfer otherwise as you have seen the prompt will be invalid -- when select the prompt you should find the cost center that have no access to do not appear in the prompt itself. If you a value that the prompt does not make available then it will error out.
If you do not want to provide read access to both cost centers, you may be able to setup a multi-step process with a transfer out by a previous owner and transfer in by the new owner using a temporary cost center both have read access to -- workforce planning uses both (one step and two step) depending on how your security is provisioned.
Regards,
-John

Similar Messages

Business Rules Runtime Prompts

Hello,
in my planning application, i have a few business rules that cannot be linket do any dataform. Users must run them directly via "Tools->Business Rules" menu'.
These Business Rules have Runtime Prompt. User can fill them directly in the text field or navigate the outline using the "Select Member" icon.
1) Is there a way users can navigate the outline using Alias table? All members have aliases but i see only member names.
Using Administration Services i use limit to filter variable's members. Again, my outline navigation in "Select Member" icon in Planning is on a non sorted member list. 2) is there a way to avoid the behaviour?
Planning versione: 9.3.1.1.8 on windows server.
thank u.
daniele

Hi,
If you need to arrange your outline in proper order you need to go to:
workspace navigate-> application library ->double click the application and you'll need to edit the application members.
right click the parent member->reorder children (select the proper order of members)
you need to deploy the applacation after you have done this. try this if it works
regards,
hanson

Two business rules runtime errors

Hi,
The business rules looks very nice but I got two runtime errors, The first I have to deploy twice else I got a wdsl error
08/02/17 13:05:16 -------> CompositeDeployerTimer: deploying composites ...
08/02/17 13:05:16 --------->deploying composite model: businessrules/br!1.0*2008-02-17_10-23-41_328
17-feb-2008 13:05:16 oracle.integration.platform.PlatformMessages warningUnableRegisterService
WARNING: Unable to register service.
oracle.fabric.common.FabricException: Error in getting XML input stream: OrderCheckRules_DecisionService.wsdl: Error in getting XML input stream: OrderCheckRules_DecisionService.wsdl: Error in getting XML input stream: oramds:/br/OrderCheckRules_DecisionService.wsdl: MDS-00054: Het bestand dat moet worden geladen oramds:/br/OrderCheckRules_DecisionService.wsdl bestaat niet.
     at oracle.integration.platform.common.MDSMetadataManagerImpl.getDocumentAsInputStream(MDSMetadataManagerImpl.java:341)
     at oracle.fabric.common.wsdl.WSDLManager.loadWSDL(WSDLManager.java:141)
     at oracle.fabric.composite.model.CompositeModel.loadImports(CompositeModel.java:149)
     at oracle.fabric.composite.model.CompositeModel.getWSDLManager(CompositeModel.java:130)
     at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.soap.WebServiceEntryBindingComponent.load(WebServiceEntryBindingComponent.java:89)
The other is more serious. All the business rules fails with the same error.
17-feb-2008 13:11:45 oracle.bpel.services.common.ServicesLogger __log
SEVERE: <.> ORABPEL-36335
Fact not found in the rule engine working memory, rule session execution failed.
The rule session bpel:1701 failed because an instance of the fact credit_check_br.OUTPUT could not be found in the working memory of the rule session.
This is most likely a rule modeling error. The decision service interaction expects the fact instance to exist in the working memory of the rule session. Check the rule actions in rule designer and make sure that a fact of the expected type is being asserted. Contact oracle support if error is not fixable.
17-feb-2008 13:11:45 oracle.bpel.services.common.ServicesLogger __log
SEVERE: <.>      at oracle.bpel.services.rules.rpi.oracle2.OracleRuleSession.executeUnitOfWork(OracleRuleSession.java:516)
17-feb-2008 13:11:45 oracle.bpel.services.common.ServicesLogger __log
SEVERE: <.>      at oracle.bpel.services.rules.rpi.AbstractDefaultRuleSession.execute(AbstractDefaultRuleSession.java:272)
17-feb-2008 13:11:45 oracle.bpel.services.common.ServicesLogger __log
SEVERE: <.>      at oracle.bpel.services.rules.rpi.oracle2.OracleRuleSession.execute(OracleRuleSession.java:246)
17-feb-2008 13:11:45 oracle.bpel.services.common.ServicesLogger __log
SEVERE: <.>      at oracle.bpel.services.rules.impl.DecisionServiceImpl.process(DecisionServiceImpl.java:1273)
17-feb-2008 13:11:45 oracle.bpel.services.common.ServicesLogger __log
SEVERE: <.>      at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
17-feb-2008 13:11:45 oracle.bpel.services.common.ServicesLogger __log
SEVERE: <.> ORABPEL-36333
Error while executing the rule session.
The rule session bpel:1701 failed to execute.
Check the underlying exception and correct the error. Contact oracle support if error is not fixable.
17-feb-2008 13:11:45 oracle.bpel.services.common.ServicesLogger __log
SEVERE: <.>      at oracle.bpel.services.rules.rpi.AbstractDefaultRuleSession.execute(AbstractDefaultRuleSession.java:287)
SEVERE: <.> Fact not found in the rule engine working memory, rule session execution failed.
The rule session bpel:1701 failed because an instance of the fact credit_check_br.OUTPUT could not be found in the working memory of the rule session.
This is most likely a rule modeling error. The decision service interaction expects the fact instance to exist in the working memory of the rule session. Check the rule actions in rule designer and make sure that a fact of the expected type is being asserted. Contact oracle support if error is not fixable.

I'm not sure what you did to create the rule you are running here. Did you try the Rules chapter of the 105 sample on the TP3 page? That one does work.
Once you have it working using the sample, try your exercise again and let us know what you did to create your rule. There are many permutations here and we want to know what doesn't work.
Heidi.

Business Rule - Invalid prompt error - Security flaw?

Hello all,
I have a business rule in which users transfers volume from one cost center to another. The users have write access to sending cost centers and no access to receiving and this is how it is need. When I designed the rule and during the testing the business rule ran fine. I am pretty sure that I ran the rule successfully with a test user setup with a lower access to test the scenario. But now the rule has stopped working. It will work only if I give write acess to user to both sending and receiving cost center.
The error message is " The following value is not valid for the run time prompt it was entered for: CCName."
As far as I understand, the security controls access to objects like calc scripts. The access just gives users the rights to view/run the script but what ever is written in script, even if it outside the scope of user access, it will still get executed. I am positive that I have done this before and it worked fine.
Any ideas as to why this wont work and why the error would start popping up? Nothing has been changed in the system.

Hi Amit,
The person running the rule will need to have read access to both cost centers in order to transfer otherwise as you have seen the prompt will be invalid -- when select the prompt you should find the cost center that have no access to do not appear in the prompt itself. If you a value that the prompt does not make available then it will error out.
If you do not want to provide read access to both cost centers, you may be able to setup a multi-step process with a transfer out by a previous owner and transfer in by the new owner using a temporary cost center both have read access to -- workforce planning uses both (one step and two step) depending on how your security is provisioned.
Regards,
-John

Business rule + compare date + problem in jspx

Hi all ,
i am useing Jdeveloper11.1.1.3 .
i need to compare birthDate and employmentDate. birthDate must be greater than employmentDate at least 15 years.
there is a business rule method in entity object impl file :
* Validation method for InsuredPerson.
public boolean validateInsuredPerson() {
//start date must be greater than birthdate _ at lease 15 year (180 month)
Date birthDate=getBirthDate();
birthDate = (Date)birthDate.addMonths(180);
Date startDate=getStartDateEmployment();
if(birthDate.compareTo(startDate)==1) {
return false;
return true;
when false eraise an error message wil genarate.
when i test it in appmodule every thing is ok but by runnig jspx page :
birthDate is --> 1970-05-05
employmentDate --> 1991-05-05
consider edit birthdate from 1970-05-05 to 1980-05-05
so 1991-1980= 11 is < 15 --> error raise
but in jspx year of birthdate changed to 1995 ==> 1980+15
any body know why?or another way to develop it.
Regards,

I change my codes now it is ok .
public boolean validateInsuredPerson() {
//start date must be greater than birthdate _ at lease 15 year
int birthYear=getBirthDate().dateValue().getYear();
int startYear=getStartDateEmployment().getValue().getYear();
int diff=startYear-birthYear;
if(diff<15) {
return false;
return true;
}

Smart View error on Launching Business Rule

Hi ,
I am in Planning 9.3.1
After connecting to Planning Webform from Smartview, i am trying to Launch Business Rule attched to the webform
Hyperion--> Calculation Option--> Rules on form
It open the new BR Launching window with all parameter selected in the Webform Page drop down list but when i trying to change the Arguments
by clicking on the icons or if i am clicking on the Launch button getting following error
"Substitution Vars XML is malfunctioned, can't initialize dialog"
any idea or tought on this.
-KK

There is an article on this issue on "My Oracle Support"
SmartView "Substitution Vars XML is malformed, can't initialize dialoge.." Message is Displayed after Clicking on the Magnify Button [ID 752508.1]
Symptoms
Error message in SmartView after clicking on the magnify button "Substitution Vars XML is malformed, can't initialize dialog.." is displayed.
Planning web forms with Business Rule (Runtime prompt) set to "Run on Save". When submitting data in SmartView, it will then open a separate window to allow changes to the run time prompt values.
Cause
This issue is caused by substitution variables values containing double quotes or the '&' signs.
Solution
This is a noted bug, but the following will help as a workaround to the problem:
1. Login to EAS as administrator.
2. Next navigate to the enterprise view.
3. Select the Essbase Servers.
4. Right-click on your server.
5. Select Edit.
6. Select Variables.
7. Remove double quotes and '&' signs from substitution variable value.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Business Rule:Usage of @ISMBR with User Prompts/ Variables+Loop Function

Hi,
currently facing a business rule user prompt - if-selection issue - not sure, if it's simply a bug or other ways how to solve it:
depending on runtimeprompt [RTP_VERSIONS], either the 1st or 2nd part of the rule should get executed using a loop command.
The special thing is, that you can choose several versions simultaniously in runtimeprompt : as soon, as Data Input is part of the selection, the 1st part of the if-section should apply and the 2nd loop executed (and other way round)
this works if I select 1 Member in the user prompt, but does not work, if I select several members.
according to the manual, @ismbr function is "true", if already 1 member is matching !
I experiemented in addition to @ismbr with @list and @range and also with additional == "Data Input"
any idea, which other command should apply ? any experience, if using user-variables with several member selections in if-sections is a problem ?
of course I could simply create separate businessrules or restrict runtimeprompt to 1 value/ version - but inconvenient.
we are on system 9.3
Businessrule:
VAR breakvar1=1; /*Controls Deletion of Budgetdata on Version Data Input */
VAR breakvar2=1; /*Controls Deletion of ALL Data on selected Versions */
FIX( "BegBalance",
[RTP_SCENARIO],
*[RTP_VERSIONS]*,
"Local",
+..... other dimensions+ )
"HSP_InputValue"
IF( *@ISMBR("Data Input")* AND not @ISMBR(&Scenario_1_curr))
breakvar1=1;
breakvar2=0;
ELSEIF( not @ISMBR(&Scenario_1_curr))
breakvar1=0;
breakvar2=1;
ENDIF;
ENDFIX;
SET UPDATECALC OFF;
SET MSG SUMMARY;
Loop(1,breakvar1) /* delete all accounts = all data */
FIX( [RTP_SCENARIO],
[RTP_VERSIONS],
@IDESCENDANTS([RTP_PROJECT])
CLEARBLOCK ALL;
ENDFIX;
ENDLOOP
Loop(1,breakvar2) /* delete only budget accounts, not setupdata */
FIX( [RTP_SCENARIO],
[RTP_VERSIONS],
@IDESCENDANTS([RTP_PROJECT]),
*@IDESCENDANTS("Costs")*
CLEARBLOCK ALL;
ENDFIX;
ENDLOOP
Edited by: Rodian Abel on May 4, 2010 10:38 PM
Edited by: Rodian Abel on May 4, 2010 10:43 PM

I think he is saying he does want to allow the user to select more than one member.
You mention you are using @ismbr and @list. I would say that should be the one that would work.
For example if you wanted Version1 and Version2 and you hardcoded it. It would look like this
If (@ismbr(@list(Version1,Version2))
So using your Variable I expect you wrote it like this
if (@ismbr(@list(variable)) and that it didn't work.
@range is useful as it is cross dimensional and that isn't the case here. So if @list doesn't work than this is a bug/problem for your specific situation and will have to approach it differently.

Can members in business rule prompts be sorted

Hi,
we have business rules with prompts in accounts as Level 0 of a parent. the users are complaining that these leaf level members in the prompts selection window are not sorted. Is there a way we can display the selection list in prompts alphabetically?
thanks

Hello,
the users see the alias or ID?
When it is the ID, then I can agree what Sree said. If it is the alias, you have a bigger challenge. Sorting the children on Alias.
I would recommend to use a relational table for creating the dimension files in EPMA or OutlineLoad.
Regards,
Philip Hulsebosch

Other Delete Business Rule Problem

Hello everybody
I have a problem with Oher delete business rules and the problem is for getting rowid for a deleted row and it causes ther error : no data found.
I solved this problem in this way
qms_transaction_mgt.process_rule_violation
( p_br_name => 'BR_TEAM004_DEL'
, p_msg_code => 'MS-00184'
, p_display_label => display_label
, p_table_name => 'ms_teams'
, p_table_rowid => null /* get_rowid */
In fact, I use null instead of get_rowid for this kind of rull. Is it a good way? Have every body any better way?
Thanks
Hassan

Hassan,
This is a known bug in the original Headstart 6i release. This bug was corrected in Headstart Patch 6.5.2.1 which is available via the Headstart Supplement Option. The Supplement Option can be purchase via your local consulting organization or the Oracle store. You will be given access to a portal from which you can download patches.
Regards,
Lauri

Error in Business Rule execution

Dear Gurus,
I have two base planning applications whihc are having lot of business rules. I have created Duplicate application for those two application by using LCM and EPMA. I have migrated each and every artefact.
I am able to see all the Business Rules in planning application and able to launch those but one business rule is giving problem.
That business rule is having 6 runtime prompts but in error it is stating only one RTP name.
The Error is - Unable to retrieve variable RTP_LAST_ACT_WK deployed in application PROPTEMP in Planning instance Default
I am clue less why the application is throwing this error.
Thanks
Giri Prasad

Hi Rahul and Endy,
I have created another duplicate application now and migrated all the artefacts and I set the default value for RTPs which i got from validation of particular business rule. Now its running fine with default instance.
The problem is i have created some more applications on different instance than the base application where the business rule validation is throwing different error.
I can stongly say that the instance is making the difference.
can you please let me know how to change the instance of existing planning applications.
Thanks
Giri

Business Rule RTP issue

Hello,
Currently I am seeing end users intermittently having issues on Business Rules. THe problem is that the description/prompt strings do not display when a user launches a rule. This seems to occur in both SmartView and IE8.
Has anyone experienced this sort of issue before ?
Cheers
Chris

I had some weird issues where the pop-up wasn't actually being displayed on the monitor, but it was opening (I think it was actually on 11.1.1.3). We found this out by someone experiencing the problem, and then adding a second monitor for another purpose and the box would show up on the second monitor. We ended up deleting the Excel items in the registry, and when Excel is reopened it rebuilt them and the popup worked, another option would have been to add a second monitor temporarily to move it back to the main monitor.
Regards
JTF

Unable to access Business Rules Facts after refreshing XML Facts

I have created a business rule using an xml schema to generate the XML Facts. Then I created a Decision Function to call a Ruleset to process the information in the XML Facts. This decision function has input and ouput parameters from the XML Facts.
The decision function is used inside a BPEL Process, by defining the Dictionary has the created business, defined the Service has de Decision Service. After this configuration I'm able to define the Input Facts and Output Facts from and to a variable in the bpel process. Using the Decision Fact Map window I define the input and output to the exposed Business Rule Facts. This works just fine. The BPEL runs and the Rules are correctly used.
When I change my xml schema to add more elements and complex types I use the "Reload XML Facts From Updated Schemas" option available in the bussiness rule. After this operation I will no longer have access to the Bussiness Rule Facts in the Decision Fact Map window. So I'm no longer able to call the decision function.
Yet the business rule has no problems and i have tested using a fuction to call the Decision Function.
Is this a bug or a feature?
I'm using Oracle 11g with the SOA Composite Editor 11.1.1.0.0.52.19.

Problem solved. There was an element in the xml schema that had nillable = true. Because of this the XML Fact for that element would no longer be available in the BPEL Process. Removing the nillable and generating the XML Facts again solved the missing variable problem.

Display of data after Business Rule Execution

Hi Gurus
We are using 11.1.2 and experiencing few problems with some of out Business Rules. The problem is, BR executed successfully and the resultant data is not displaying in the target form. As a workaround, we put a dummy value in any of the target's combination and re-execute the BR, this time BR gets populate the target cell. Pls advice what sort of problem is this???
Thanks in advance,
SNK

It could be down to the business rule not creating blocks, by entering dummy data then you are creating the blocks and the rule will run as expected.
Have a look at this post :- Re: Busines rule Issue
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Problem with FIX-Statement in Business Rule

Hello,
ich have a business rule with two nested FIX-Statements.
I calculate depending on the month in the runtime-prompt a forecast for this month. After that i fix on that month an clear some specific accounts. But some of these accounts still have data.
they are in the cleardata section and they are children of FiBuKonten from the first fix. When i leave out the @CHILDREN("FiBuKonten") in the first fix the accounts are cleared as excepted, but i need that fix because not all accounts are part of this forecast.
I changed everything to work as a calc-script and the same problem appears, on dev and prod database.
Why are some accounts cleared while others not ? Really misterious!
Here is the rule
FIX([TEBIT_RTP_Year],[TEBIT_RTP_Version],"IFRS operativ",[TEBIT_RTP_Entity],"Daten brutto","Daten_brutto_P_M",@CHILDREN("FiBuKonten"))
[TEBIT_RTP_Period](
IF(@ISMBR("Jan"))
Actual_kum = Budget_kum;
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Feb"))
Actual_kum = Budget_kum;
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Apr"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("1HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Mar)/9 + Actual_kum->Mar,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("May"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("1HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Apr)/8 + Actual_kum->Apr,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Jul"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("2HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Jun)/6 + Actual_kum->Jun,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Aug"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("2HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Jul)/5 + Actual_kum->Jul,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Oct"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("3HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Sep)/3 + Actual_kum->Sep,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Nov"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("3HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Oct)/2 + Actual_kum->Oct,2);
ENDIF;)
FIX([TEBIT_RTP_Period])
     CLEARDATA "41000000";
     CLEARDATA "41100000";
     CLEARDATA "41200000";
     CLEARDATA "41990000";
     CLEARDATA "41000900";
     CLEARDATA "41096000";
     CLEARDATA "41196000";
     CLEARDATA "41296000";
     CLEARDATA "41940000";
     CLEARDATA "42000000";
     CLEARDATA "42100000";
     CLEARDATA "42200000";
     CLEARDATA "42099000";
     CLEARDATA "42199000";
     CLEARDATA "42299000";
     CLEARDATA "42990000";
     CLEARDATA "41918000";
     CLEARDATA "41100900";
     CLEARDATA "42091000";
     CLEARDATA "42918000";
     CLEARDATA "54000000";
     CLEARDATA "54009000";
     CLEARDATA "54009900";
     CLEARDATA "54009600";
     CLEARDATA "54130200";
     CLEARDATA "93541175";
     CLEARDATA "54001000";
     CLEARDATA "54001900";
     CLEARDATA "54014000";
     CLEARDATA "54019000";
     CLEARDATA "54021000";
     CLEARDATA "54021900";
ENDFIX
ENDFIX
Thx for your help.
Greets
Kevin

Does it make a difference when a dimension has dynamic calc members and i dont fix on that dimension to fix on the Level 0 members of that dimension ? The result should be the same in my eyes.
SGF is dense. I found out that everytime i the fix includes that first member M_124100 the error occoured.
I changed the rule in the form that i split the FIX Statement. And now it works without the error and with all data cleared. Even when i don`t reorder the dimension SGF.
Again thanks for your help.
Greets
Kevin
FIX([TEBIT_RTP_Year],[TEBIT_RTP_Version],"IFRS operativ",[TEBIT_RTP_Entity],"Daten brutto","Daten_brutto_P_M")
FIX(@CHILDREN("FiBuKonten"))
[TEBIT_RTP_Period](
IF(@ISMBR("Jan"))
Actual_kum = Budget_kum;
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Feb"))
Actual_kum = Budget_kum;
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Apr"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("1HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Mar)/9 + Actual_kum->Mar,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("May"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("1HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Apr)/8 + Actual_kum->Apr,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Jul"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("2HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Jun)/6 + Actual_kum->Jun,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Aug"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("2HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Jul)/5 + Actual_kum->Jul,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Oct"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("3HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Sep)/3 + Actual_kum->Sep,2);
ELSEIF(@ISMBR("Nov"))
Actual_kum = @ROUND(("3HR"->Dec - Actual_kum->Oct)/2 + Actual_kum->Oct,2);
ENDIF;)
ENDFIX
FIX([TEBIT_RTP_Period])
CLEARDATA "41000000";
CLEARDATA "41100000";
CLEARDATA "41200000";
CLEARDATA "41990000";
CLEARDATA "41000900";
CLEARDATA "41096000";
CLEARDATA "41196000";
CLEARDATA "41296000";
CLEARDATA "41940000";
CLEARDATA "42000000";
CLEARDATA "42100000";
CLEARDATA "42200000";
CLEARDATA "42099000";
CLEARDATA "42199000";
CLEARDATA "42299000";
CLEARDATA "42990000";
CLEARDATA "41918000";
CLEARDATA "41100900";
CLEARDATA "42091000";
CLEARDATA "42918000";
CLEARDATA "54000000";
CLEARDATA "54009000";
CLEARDATA "54009900";
CLEARDATA "54009600";
CLEARDATA "54130200";
CLEARDATA "93541175";
CLEARDATA "54001000";
CLEARDATA "54001900";
CLEARDATA "54014000";
CLEARDATA "54019000";
CLEARDATA "54021000";
CLEARDATA "54021900";
ENDFIX
ENDFIX

Sequence will not validate with run time prompts in business rules

I am in Hyperion Planning v 1.1.1.3, with Workforce initialized. I am creating a sequence of business rules. The rules use run time prompts within them and validate when used on their own. However, when I insert them in a sequence the sequence will not validate, apparently due to the run time prompts.
The sequence returns the error: Cannot calculate. Essbase Error(1200323): Error parsing formula for [FIX STATEMENT] (line 7): expression expected after [(].
Line 7 in the business rule is as follows:
FIX ([rtpYear],[rtpScenario],[rtpVer],[rtpCC],[rtpBU],[rtpEmp])
The problem is not isolated to this business rule, it occurs with any rule I try.
Can sequences function with run time prompts in the included business rules?
Stephen

I have figured out that if any rtp is hidden in the business rule, the sequence will not validate. Is this expected behavior for sequences?
Additionally, hiding the variables in the sequence has no effect if the variables are not hidden in the rule. When launched from a menu in a web form, the user is prompted for values for all variables (except for the Execution Database Name) although they are prepopulated based on the members in the POV, Page, etc. Is this also expected behavior?
I also find that it won't validate if "Merge launch variables" is selected (I have included rules associated with different plan types and with different dimensionality, so this may be expected). The user is prompted to provide values for every variable in each rule in the sequence, many of them duplicates (though, again, they are prepopulated based on members in the form).
Stephen

Business rule, runtime prompt problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for