BW Query showing more Material than R/3 Query, Why..??

Hi All,
I am facing problem when running the query on Inventory cube 0IC_C03.
I have loaded data from 3 Data Sources 2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_UM as mentioned in below link and strictly followed by applying Marker updates after the load
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f83be790-0201-0010-4fb0-98bd7c01e328
Now the problem is,
End User trying to compare BW Inventory Query (Plant Analysis: Stock) values with MC.1 (Plant Analysis: Stock: Selection)
In R/3 (MC.1) showing the total number of materials are 3755 for the period 01.2008
In BW Query for the same period (01.2008) total number of materials are 3960
I am doubting why BW showing more materials?, this resulting the differance value for Valueated Stock value and Valuated Stock Quantity when we compare with R/3.
When i am comparing material wise in BW query with MC.1, whatever the missing Materials are showing in BW Query as 0 Quantity but some value
Ex: Values is = -£ 51.46 and Quantity is = 0 EA
Please provide me some inputs, your help will be appreciated.
Regards,
Rajesh

Hi Rajesh,
Please check the Material numbers which are coming extra in BW not in R/3 whether they are under any material group. If they are all in under the "#" material group then u can restrict the query by filtering the material group "#".
Just filter Excluding the "#" material group in the query.
Then you will get the right values.
Hope this may help you.
The difference between the BW and R/3 material numbers is because. Some extra materials may get from the UM datasource, so you are getting only values and not the quantities.
Try the above idea. I hope it works.
With Regards,
Ravi Kanth.

Similar Messages

Why does my exported swf show more content than actually on frame?

Why does my exported .swf show more content than actually on frame?
My problem is relatively simple, though, I had some trouble finding a solution to it:
When I play my exported animation using flash player in Google Chrome, if the window is bigger than the resolution flash document/frame, it shows content not meant to show up on the frame -- like parts of a huge background that aren't supposed to show up yet.
In other words, how do I constraint the .swf to the white background/document resolution?

Anyone? I'd appreciate it if someone replied soon -- I am done with my project once this issue is resolved, and I am excited to publish it.
Please respond if you have any useful knowledge on the matter!
Thanks!

HT201210 My Music library is showing more songs than I actually have? How do I fix this?

My actual music library on my phone is showing 100+ more songs than I actually have. But on my computer it's showing a completely different (less) number? Should I restore?

Try:
- Reset the iOS device. Nothing will be lost
Reset iOS device: Hold down the On/Off button and the Home button at the same time for at
least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
- Unsync all music and resync
- Reset all settings
Go to Settings > General > Reset and tap Reset All Settings.
All your preferences and settings are reset. Information (such as contacts and calendars) and media (such as songs and videos) aren’t affected.
- Restore from backup. See:
iOS: How to back up
- Restore to factory settings/new iOS device.

Control array's scrollbar shows more rows than dimensions

When an array's dimension and Number of Rows property are set to the same value, its vertical scrollbar is shown and implies there is one more row available in the array than the actual array size.
This happen only if the array is a control, not when it is an indicator. As an indicator, no scrollbar is shown at run time. In edit mode, a scrollbar is shown when as an indicator.
Is there a way to not have the scollbar appear if the number of rows equals the array size yet have it appear when the number of rows is less than the array size ?
Example vi attached.
Attachments:
Array scroll bar dimension.vi ‏18 KB

Jennifer,
In practice, the number of displayed array rows is restricted so that only enough rows are shown to remain within the bounds of the front panel. Otherwise as the array size is increased, the array will extend off the bottom of the screen. My modified version shows this restriction. But notice that as a control, the array shows one more dimension than it had been allocated to (and is shown as a disabled row). In fact, clicking on the bottom arrow of the scollbar will continue to add more rows to the array control.
Steve
Attachments:
Array scroll bar dimension.vi ‏22 KB

CallsAnsweredToHalf shows more calls than CallsHandledToHalf + ReserveCallsToHalf columns

We're running UCCE 8.5 with CVP 8.0 and UCM 7.5
When I look at the Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour table I see that the
CallsAnsweredToHalf column equals the sum of the CallsHandledToHalf and the ReserveCallsToHalf columns but only 95% of the time.
What I mean is that out of the 300+ agents we have for 10 of them it doesn't match. The CallsAnsweredToHalf column shows 1 more call than in the
CallsHandledToHalf and ReserveCallsToHalf columns.
I have looked and compared at the other columns to see if maybe there's a third column in the mix but it doesn't look like it.
Does anybody know why of this discrepancy? a bug maybe?
thanks

Hi,
It wont be same always the CallsAnsweredToHalf and CallsHandledToHalf because with in half hour which are call is answered by the agent is updated in the CallsAnsweredToHalf column but only the calls that have been answered and have completed wrap-up by agents in the skill group during the half-hour interval will be updated in the CallsHandledToHalf column.
Regards,
Gnaneswaran.

IPad mail icon shows more emails than there actually is?

My iPad shows more unread emails than there actually is - How do I fix this?

I figured it out! Clicked on EDIT then clicked on "mark as unread," on the bottom of the page; then clicked "mark as read," and it was fixed.

Is a WITH...SELECT query more efficient than a SELECT query ?

Hi folks,
Is the WITH...SELECT just a convenience or is it really efficient than a simple SELECT with UNION ALL ? e.g. is the following:
with rset as (select dname,empno,ename,hiredate,sal from emp e,dept d where e.deptno=d.deptno)
select dname,empno,ename,hiredate,sal,
case
when trunc(hiredate) < to_date('19800101','yyyymmdd') then 'Hired before 1980'
when trunc(hiredate) between to_date('19800101','yyyymmdd') and to_date('19851231','yyyymmdd') then 'Hired between 1980 and 1985'
else 'Hired after 1985'
end as notes
from rset
union all
select dname,empno,ename,hiredate,sal,
case
when sal < 500 then 'Salary less than 500'
when sal between 501 and 1500 then 'Salary between 501 and 1500'
else 'Salary greater than 1500'
end as notes
from rset;
better than the following:
select dname,empno,ename,hiredate,sal,
case
when trunc(hiredate) < to_date('19800101','yyyymmdd') then 'Hired before 1980'
when trunc(hiredate) between to_date('19800101','yyyymmdd') and to_date('19851231','yyyymmdd') then 'Hired between 1980 and 1985'
else 'Hired after 1985'
end as notes
from emp e,dept d where e.deptno=d.deptno
union all
select dname,empno,ename,hiredate,sal,
case
when sal < 500 then 'Salary less than 500'
when sal between 501 and 1500 then 'Salary between 501 and 1500'
else 'Salary greater than 1500'
end as notes
from emp e,dept d where e.deptno=d.deptno;
I am a newbie at sql tuning. Apparently, the first query should be faster because it runs the actual query only once and then just works on the resultset obtained. Is this thinking correct ?
Thanks a lot!!
JP

Also I tried a test here with a ten million row emp table queried five times, and explain plan showed the optimizer would read emp five times and not once.
Re: Intresting question
Apparently, the first query should be faster because it runs the actual query only once
and then just works on the resultset obtained.But my test combined with Jonathan's article made me question whether materializing ten million rows somewhere would be faster than querying them five times. Somehow I doubt it.

Reports showing more visits than Google Analytics

Question:
I have been receiving significantly high reports on numerous blogs posted across two different sites. When I compare the BC report to Google Analytics it's a massive different in numbers/page views.
Page views on web pages seems normal. But the blog reporting is significantly higher than what we suspect.
Answer:
A couple of things:
1, Always expect a 10% difference between BC reporting and a JavaScript based solution such as Google Analytics, as roughly 10% of web users browse with JavaScript disabled.
With this disabled, Google Analytics has a very limited ability for tracking unique user visits, as it can't place a cookie on their system or send data back to the Google servers.
As BC's tracking is all done server side (ie. not some code snippet you're pasting in), it should be able to more accurately measure these statistics.
2. Some web crawlers may not bypass BCs filtering and hence be recorded as hits.
For instance, with your blog you may have more heavily distributed links throughout the web via social media. A whole range of crawlers, archivers and indexers then visit those links to absorb the information and further spread it.
Most of these automated browsers have JavaScript disabled, so again, your Google Analytics simply won't pick their traffic up.
BC will record their traffic however, and they actively try to filter these out - but I'm sure some inevitably fall through the cracks and get marked as legitimate traffic.

Hi,
Its just a general thought and I realize you know your application and user community better I do, but do you think your users are going to be very happy when they are presented with a report with more than a hundred columns? Have you considered maybe presenting the data in some sort of rolled up form from which the user can then drill down to the data they are particularly interested in. Also, I'm sure your LAN administrator would be happy not to see 100+ column by x number row reports being regularly shipped across the network.
Also, 100+ column reports suggests tables with 100+ columns which are probably not designed in a very relationally compliant way. I find that good DB design usually results in applications that have to make less compromises, such as hacking export files in order to fool the API into making ridiculous, unsupported and unsupportable compromises.
Just a thought..................
Regards
Andre

Query showing less data than the listcube

Hi Gurus,
For the same keyfigure I am getting $20 less in the query but the LISTCUBE of the multiprovider is showing correct value compared to R/3.
Please extend your ideas.
Thanks
Nisha

Hi,
It is exactly the same filter criteria that I have put in the LISTCUBE which is pulling correct data in the list cube.
Thanks

If Apple incorrectly showed more bars than it should have... wouldn't most

phone makers do the same, to make their phone look better?
I lost two bar after upgrading, but I do seem to have similar service. No dropped calls.

I wouldnt say that they are throwing at&t under the bus.. It will just keep at&t honest about where the weak spots are. I would say that they are showing a "truer" signal than was previously shown. Granted my personal opinion like in my previous post.. my best dBm level i've ever seen on my BlackBerry was -70dBm which was full 5 bars. but according to apples new software that 70dBm is within the "5 bar" limit. altho its much closer to the 4 bar section. So realistically should the blackberry have shown 4 instead of 5? Im curious to see if any former blackberry users like myself are able to mention if they have ever had lower than a -70dBm reading on their berry and how their new signal on the iPhone 4 matches up. I usually display the same level signal (with 4.0.1) as i did with my bold 9000. There are some locations that i will show 3 bars where it used to be 5 - but its a very reliable 3 (even had data rates in the 4000kbps down/2400kbps up) in the 3 bar range. So i'm very pleased.

Query returns more row than expected

1. select * from view_name where col1 = 'value1' returns 12 rows
2. select * from (view script) where col1 = 'value1' returns 24 rows
i have a view called view_name. If i use view_name directly in the query, it returns 12 rows. But if i use the select script directly in from clause, it returns more rows. I am not able to find out why it is happening so. Any pointers will be helpful.

Are you saying that the SQL for view_name and view_script are identical? Can you post them?

Usage showing more memory than is accounted for

how do i get rid of 'other' storage bloating?

Other is email, text messages, and the stuff that apps use in the background, like when you save your place in a game. You can try deleting old email and text messages. Specifically if people send you pictures in text messages and as attachments.
Other than that, yes you need to restore your phone as new and do not restore from a backup, the backup will put the "Other" stuff right back on your phone.

Photo library shows more photos than it really has

My photo library has 41 photos, however when checking "Usage" it shows I have 10.4Gb. Why?
The complete Photo & Camera shows:
1. Photo Library = 10.4 Gb
2. My Photo Stream = 20.1 Mb
3. Shared Photo Stream = 821 Mb
when checking via iTunes, it shows I have 3801 photos, where are they? I know they are not the in recently deleted album.
Any ideas?

Hi rfirmeza,
It may help to force close all open apps and restart your iPhone.
Force an app to close in iOS
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT5137
Turn your iOS device off and on (restart) and reset
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT1430
If you're still seeing a discrepancy in the number of photos on your device and storage space used, the next step would be to reinstall iOS on your device by placing it in Recovery Mode, then choosing Update in iTunes.
Make sure that you have iTunes 12 or later on your computer.
Put your device in recovery mode.
When you get the option to restore or update, select Update. This will reinstall iOS without erasing your data.
If your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch doesn't respond or doesn't turn on
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201412
Cheers,
Allen

Why does my iTunes show more photos than I really do on my device?

I only have 493 photos on my device but my iTunes shows that I have 644 and a lot of memory is used because of that? Any reason why this happens and how I might be able to delete the extra photos?

Try to reset the phone by holding the sleep and home button for about 10sec, until the Apple logo comes back again. You will not lose any data by resetting, but it can cure some glitches.
If this does not help, setting it up as new device would be the next step:
How to erase your iOS device and then set it up as a new device or restore it from backups

Oracle view return more rows than its base query

O/S : AIX
Database : 11g R (11.1.0.6.0)
Query in questioon :
select A.CompanyCode, A.Code ElementCode, A.ItemTypeCode ElementItemTypeCode, A.SubcodeKey ElementSubcodeKey,
D.DecoSubcode01 SubCode01, D.DecoSubcode02 SubCode02, D.DecoSubcode03 SubCode03, D.DecoSubcode04 SubCode04,
D.DecoSubcode05 SubCode05, D.DecoSubcode06 SubCode06, D.DecoSubcode07 SubCode07, D.DecoSubcode08 SubCode08,
D.DecoSubcode09 SubCode09, D.DecoSubcode10 SubCode10, C.ItemTypeBCode, C.SubCode01B, C.SubCode02B, C.SubCode03B,
C.SubCode04B, C.SubCode05B, C.SubCode06B, C.SubCode07B, C.SubCode08B, C.SubCode09B, C.SubCode10B,
B1.ValueString SlipNo, B2.ValueString EmployeeCode, B3.ValueString SetNo, B4.ValueString SalesOrderCounterCode,
B5.ValueString SalesOrderCode, B6.ValueString Remarks, B7.ValueDecimal SumTareWeight, B8.ValueString PackingUMCode,
B9.ValueString PrimaryUMCode, B10.ValueString PlantCode, B11.ValueDecimal PackingFormCode, D.LogicalWarehouseCode FromWarehouseCode,
D.TemplateCode FromTemplateCode, D.PhysicalWarehouseCode FromPhysicalWarehouseCode, D.WHSLOCATIONWAREHOUSEZONECODE FromZoneCode,
D.WarehouseLocationCode FromLocationCode, E.LogicalWarehouseCode ToWarehouseCode, E.TemplateCode ToTemplateCode, E.PhysicalWarehouseCode ToPhysicalWarehouseCode,
E.WHSLOCATIONWAREHOUSEZONECODE ToZoneCode, E.WarehouseLocationCode ToLocationCode, D.TransactionDate, D.ItemTypeCode, E.WeightGross SumGrossWeight, E.WeightNet SumNetWeight
FROM Elements A, ADStorage B1, ADStorage B2, ADStorage B3, ADStorage B4, ADStorage B5, ADStorage B6, ADStorage B7,
ADStorage B8, ADStorage B9, ADStorage B10, ADStorage B11, GoodCutAndFentDetail C, StockTransaction D, StockTransaction E
where A.ABSUNIQUEID=B1.UNIQUEID and B1.NameEntityName='Elements' and B1.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentSlipNo'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B2.UNIQUEID and B2.NameEntityName='Elements' and B2.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentEmployee'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B3.UNIQUEID and B3.NameEntityName='Elements' and B3.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentSetNo'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B4.UNIQUEID and B4.NameEntityName='Elements' and B4.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentSOCounterCode'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B5.UNIQUEID and B5.NameEntityName='Elements' and B5.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentSOCode'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B6.UNIQUEID and B6.NameEntityName='Elements' and B6.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentRemarks'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B7.UNIQUEID and B7.NameEntityName='Elements' and B7.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentTareWeight'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B8.UNIQUEID and B8.NameEntityName='Elements' and B8.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentPackingUM'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B9.UNIQUEID and B9.NameEntityName='Elements' and B9.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentPrimaryUM'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B10.UNIQUEID and B10.NameEntityName='Elements' and B10.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentPlant'
and A.ABSUNIQUEID=B11.UNIQUEID and B11.NameEntityName='Elements' and B11.FieldName ='GoodCutAndFentPackingForm'
and A.CompanyCode=C.CompanyCode and SlipNo=C.SlipNo and C.SeqNo=1 and A.ItemTypeCode=C.ElementItemTypeCode
and A.SubcodeKey=C.ElementSubcodeKey and A.Code=C.ElementCode and A.CompanyCode=D.CompanyCode
and C.FromSTTransactionNumber=D.TransactionNumber and C.FromSTTransactionDetailNumber=D.TransactionDetailNumber
and A.CompanyCode=E.CompanyCode and C.ToSTTransactionNumber=E.TransactionNumber
and C.ToSTTransactionDetailNumber=E.TransactionDetailNumber
and SLIPNO='57575763636'
This query return 1 row.
Then i created a view on this query except condition SLIPNO='57575763636'
Now when i use the view as shown below return two rows.
select * from ViewGoodCutAndFent WHERE SLIPNO = '57575763636'
I am not able to determine where is problem area is. Thanks & Regards

In the query SLIPNO is probably C.SlipNo
In the view SLIPNO is probably B1.ValueString

BW Query showing more Material than R/3 Query, Why..??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for