CA - Year End 2011

Recently we applied the required year end payroll patches to our clients DEV and QAS systems. The requirement was to patch SAP_HR from level 64 to 74, including all the SAP_BASIS, SAP_ABA, PI_BASIS and all other prerequisite patches.
After applying year end payroll patching, it was noticed that in table view V_512W_D the validity period of many standard wage types was changed. For the wage types affected, the new validity period starts on 01/01/2012. While this in itself is not a major issue, we have some concerns about other standard SAP objects that may have been affected by the year end payroll patching.
How can we find out about other tables that may have been affected in a similar fashion?

It is normal to have some WTs delimited at the beginning of the fiscal year to respond to the Legal Changes, as they require changes a Processing Class or Cumulator. Look into the Master Canadian Year-End Note (and the related Notes) for all the information.
Furthermore, the same happens to some constants (in V_T511K) and to some Tax parameters.
Edited by: Rémi Corriveau on Jan 3, 2012 3:21 PM

Similar Messages

CA - Year End 2011 Planning Question

I am planning to do a Stack Upgrade for this year on ECC EHP4 to Stack level 8. But I am wondering if I should wait until Stack 9 is released at the end of this month. The main driver for the stack upgrade is component SAP_HR & EA_HR.
Last year, we got to SAP_HR level 23 and then applied the CLC. If I apply Stack level 8 it only gets me to level SAP_HR 26. Looking at the releases for SAP_HR it states that #42 will require stack 9 and is listed as a sycnchro point for 2011 and also #36 will be synchro point.
I don't want to do 2 stack upgrades in one year. Will SAP_HR #36 be the synchro point ? or will SAP_HR #42 be the synchro point.
What is the best approach - apply stack 8 and then go to SAP_HR 36 and apply CLC from there ? or apply Stack 9 and go to SAP_HR and either apply CLC or all other releases required for SAP_HR & EA_HR for year end.

Hi Andrew,
I understand there are two synchro points: one at stack 8 (which requires SP 36) and other at stack 9 (which requires SP 42). The decision about which one to apply is yours. If you go to stack 8, afterwards you will be required to apply more CLCs that going to stack 9. On the other hand if you apply stack 8 you will be up to date with your system earlier and will be able to avoid eventual issues.
Please check the following link for further information: http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000595040&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&_OBJECT=011000358700005142032000E
Kind regards,
Felipe Grandi

Year end

HI SAP Gurus
we are going to apply SAP notes , today do i need any furthur configuration required for that or SPS will already configured, plese help me out
thank you in advance

Hello Goutham,
Kindly clarify whether you are taking about Payroll US or Payroll Canada,
If it is Payroll US,
then all the relevant note's and HRSP Level is document in the year end page
"Service.sap.com/hrusa" --> Year end
Also you can put watch this thread for year end thread for payroll US
"US - Year End 2011
If it is Payroll Canada,
then all the relevant notes and HRSP Level is document in the year end page
"service.sap.com/hrcanada" --> Year end
Also you can put watch this thread for year end thread for payroll canada
"CA - Year End 2011
With Regards,
S.Karthik

Year End Adjustments for AW CPF - Singapore Payroll

Hi,
The year end adjustments are not reflecting for the Dec month payroll.
Please kindly refer to the below calculations for the excess amounts that are not being calculated for AW CPF.
Month      OW paid in 2011     OW subject to CPF in 2011     Contribution Payable For OW Employer - 2011     Contribution Payable For OW Employee - 2011     AW paid in 2011     AW subject to CPF     Contribution Payable For AW Employer - 2011     Contribution Payable For AW Employee - 2011
Jan     $7,000     $4,500     $675     $900
Feb     $7,000     $4,500     $675     $900     $23,000     $22,500
Mar     $7,000     $4,500     $698     $900
April     $7,000     $4,500     $698     $900
May     $7,000     $4,500     $698     $900
June     $7,000     $4,500     $698     $900
July     $7,000     $4,500     $698     $900     $30,000     0     0     0
Aug     $7,000     $4,500     $698     $900
Sept     $7,000     $5,000     $800     $1,000
Oct     $7,000     $5,000     $800     $1,000
Nov     $7,000     $5,000     $800     $1,000
Dec     $7,000     $5,000     $800     $1,000     $20,000     $833     $127     $166
To be more clear the /314 and /315 are not being populated.
Any other note that has been missing or is very important to carry out the function.
Thanks
Edited by: swatibani on Dec 5, 2011 8:43 AM

resolved by self

Asset Fiscal Year End Closing - Depreciation not posted completely in 2010

Hi Experts,
I have an issue concerning AA 2010 year end closing, since there is one asset which depreciation in 2010 was not posted completely, meaning that we cannot close 2010 fiscal year.
This happened because of the following situation:
Vendor Incoice was posted in 30.12.2010, with a document date 31.03.2010 (meaning that for this asset the depreciation calculation start date was 01.03.2010). Then, in 30.03.2011 someone post the reversal document, with posting date 31.12.2010.
So for this asset I donu2019t have any depreciation posted in 2011 and no values in depreciation book, for the asset, meaning that even if I change the depreciation calculation start date for 01.01.2011, it will still be necessary to run depreciation in Dec.2010.
However I cannot run depreciation for this asset for 2010 because it will have impact in 2010 balance sheet, which cannot happen.
Do you have any ideas to solve this problem?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Andreia Nascimento

Hi,
As i have already suggested you for the [SIMILAR THREAD|Re: Asset Fiscal Year Closing not possible], which you have only posted in FI forum, there is no other alternative than running the repeat dep run for FY 2010 for period 12.
Please do not cross post your questions.
REgards,
Srinu

Asset year end closing issue

Hi, I run ajab to close year 2010 (not 2011)and encounter below issue:
Asset 004110000555-0000 in company code 0000 (depreciation incomplete)
Message no. AU070
Diagnosis
The planned depreciation was not completely posted to Financial Accounting for asset 004110000555-0000 in company code IN00 in depreciation area 90.
System Response
Year-end closing cannot be carried out for company code IN00.
Procedure
Post the depreciaton using the appropriate posting program (Periodic processing) in Financial Accounting. Then start a repeat run for this asset, if necessary
My depreciation area 90 is "Post assets periodically in General Ledger", what should I do?

Hi
Is depreciation fully posted for the year 2010. Try to run AFAB in repeat mode for the last period of 2010 in test run to see if any values are coming for posting.
If depreciation values exist, then same needs to be posted before you close the Asset fiscal year.
Also please note for posting the depreciation your Fiscal year and period should be open in accounting.
Regards
Malathi

Cycle count (MICN) exceeded at year end

Hi all,
i have alreay completed the cycle count till 30 dec 2009 by using MICN.But whenever i started counting for 31st december 2009( end of 2009),it is giving me 1500 materials to count. But in real scenario, it should give arround 10 materilas to count.
Please tell me what i should do so that i can get actual cycle count for 31st dec 2009. Is this problem relating to year end problem? If so, what i should do to solve this issue.
Thanks
pabi

Hi Syed,
Thanks for your reply.But i count the materials everyday.Maximum 10 materials come for cycle count everyday.
From 1st december to 30 december, i count every day & my cycle count is within 10.
But suddenly, when i put the date 31st december 2009, then cycle count is more than 1500 which is unexpected.
i came to know that, my manager has opened the calender year till 2011. Is it causing any problem?
or This is year end problem & to solve this, i need to open 2010 financial year. Plz suggest what is the real problem & solution
for this.
Thanks
pabi

Year End-Notes Emergency Contacts

We have applied all the 2011 year-end notes and have discovered an error It looks like anyone listed as an emergency contact on the family member dependent Infotype 0021 now appears as an emergency contact on the Health Insurance infotype 167 with a red error. Any suggestions or notes pertaining to this error?
Thanks,
Kawana

What Country's Year-End Note(s) are you referring to ?
On what version are you on ?
I don't know for other Countries, but the Canadian Year-End Note will not be available until December 1st.
We are currently in the process to apply the Baseline Support Packs (SAPKE60062 to SAPKE60074) to be ready for the Year-End Note.

Month-end and year-end valuation differences!

Hı Friends,
What are the differences between Month-end and year end valuation in the system?
Thank you!

Yes
For example
31.12.2010
Dr/Cr Forex loss/gain a/c
Cr/Dr B/s adjustment a/c
01.01.2011
Dr/Cr B/s adjustment a/c
Cr/Dr Forex loss/gain a/c

Funds Management Year-end Issue

For Funds Management Module year end activity, it mainly involves commitment and budget carry forward.
For a particular Fund / Fund Centre, we transferred the commitment and the budget from 2011 to 2012. However it was not distributed accordingly in 2012. From the screenshot below, you can see that the budget (Sender) had multiple levels (Fund Centres).
1.MIMOS
2.1000
    3.MM05
      4.MM0501
        5.MM050107
However, the receiver was only at the highest level which is MIMOS. Now under the budget reports, it is showing insufficient funds @ the Fund Centre level.
Please guide me on how do I redistribute Funds to the lower levels Fund Centres.
Please refer to the screenshot at: http://nazrinrizal.blogspot.com/2012/01/funds-management-fm-year-end-issue.html
Help would be very much appreciated. Thanks!

You could try out transaction FM9P for year 2012 in your test system to reconstruct the distributed values.
To me it seems that the actual budget for 2011 has only been entered for the top-level MIMOS and distributed from there (I assume you are using Former Budgeting), and thus the carryforward only considers the "actual" fund center + fund combination for which the budget was entered.
If budget would have been entered to the lowest-level fund center, you would have to run FM9Q to sum it up for the above fund center hierarchy levels.

Clarification on Canada Year End SAP Note : 1658938 and 1662043

Dear All ,
We are currently doing yearend SAP note updates for Canada and need clarification on Canada Year End SAP Note : 1658938 and 1662043 .
SAP Note : 1658938 is with yearend delta transports which needs to be applied ,but it is mentioned that we need to apply all Year End related notes released on or before December 15th before applying the Delta transports.
My query is that Note 1662043 released on 12/12/2011 whether this needs to be applied before or after applying delta transports mentioned in 1658938
Pls help us on this .
Thanks
Muthuraj

Hello Muthuraj,
You need to apply note 1662043 the note before applying the delta transport.
I hope it clarifies.
With Regards,
S.Karthik

Balancing for Year end

Hi,
I'm in Toronto looking for a document that explains the
- SAP process for Balancing Year End
- SAP standard reports that are used to balance at the end of the year.
Thanks in advance.....
Regards,
Shahzad Jiwani

The above image is document of YEC 2011 and applicable for SAP B1 8.81 and 8.82 releases.
So, if you are currently use one of both releases, you can use the above document.
you can ask the var to send you the document or you can search it in the google.
Rgds,
JimM

Back up plan for Asset year end closing

Hi,
Do you have any back plan prepared for Asset year end closing especially t.code AJRW and AJAB (running this in Background).
what back up plan we should recommend if it fails for already happened activities.
Regards
Shanu

Hi Shanu,
there is a Test-run modus.
If it fails for some reasons, you will get a error message. Then you solve this error and repeat AJRW or AJAB.
regards Bernhard

Mid year go live and year end go live

Hi Experts,
What is the difference in configuring Mid year go live and year end go live What are difficulties we face in mid year go live.
thanks & Regards.
Akhil

https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=21620306&messageID=6587485
you go live on the SAP payroll system in the middle of a financial year, you have an option to transfer your legacy data into the SAP payroll system.
The system provides the schema INLK for transferring your legacy data. For this purpose, you need to perform the following IMG activities:
Define the payroll periods for which you want to transfer the legacy data. For more information, refer to the IMG under Payroll India -> Legacy Data Transfer -> Define Periods for Import
Define the type of data you want to import. For more information refer to the IMG under Payroll India -> Legacy Data Transfer -> Define Pay Elements for Import
Upon execution along with the payroll driver, the schema INLK formats the information defined in the above tables as payroll results and stores the values in the database table PCL2.
For more information on the Legacy Data Transfer functionality, refer to OSS note number 506128.

Issue in year end closing

Hi
I have an issue in year end closing. What would be effect if i do not clear the open items in GR/IR Account as part of year end acitivity. The balance in my GR/IR Account is zero as of my balance sheet date.
What would happen if i run the balance carry forward program?
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

This program will reclassify the entries for the Balance sheet reporting. Since your balance is zero there should not be any impact on the reporting side. Whether you run this program or not it will not have any impact on the balance carry forward program. Since these entries will get reversed at the beginning of the next period in any case.
The config setting will be in OBYP
The following config document may help you in better understanding.
Define Adjustment Accounts for GR/IR Clearing
The goods receipt/invoice receipt (GR/IR) clearing account is posted to whenever you receive goods that have not been invoiced yet or whenever you receive invoices for goods that have not been delivered yet.
In this activity you define the numbers of the adjustment and target accounts for the automatic postings for the GR/IR clearing account.
Transfer postings have to be made at the balance sheet date to reflect the goods invoiced but not delivered and the goods delivered but not invoiced. The program that analyzes the GR/IR clearing account adjustments this account by posting any outstanding amounts to an adjustment account. It makes the offsetting entry to the account for goods delivered but not invoiced or to the account for goods invoiced but not delivered (target account).
Edited by: Sivakumar Gopalakrishnan on Jan 15, 2008 4:11 PM

CA - Year End 2011

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for