Calculation in a condition

Post Author: rohan_ferns
CA Forum: WebIntelligence Reporting
All,
Pretty novice user of WebI.
I'm currently running a query in my WebI inbox which prompts user to enter year and month as takes these inputs to give the final output. Is there a way by which I can take the year part and month part of the system date as the inputs than having to prompt the user to enter these values.
By wanting to do so I can eliminate the need for user interaction and schedule these reports to other Infoview inboxes on a scheduled day of every month.
Help appreciated.
Thank You.
Regards,
Rohan Fernandes
BO Reporting Analyst

Post Author: rohan_ferns
CA Forum: WebIntelligence Reporting
jsanzone,
Didn't understand when you said "You don't mentioned database vendor". If you meant BO version I'm currently using BO Release XI.
Also when I'm editing this query in WebI, I've pulled these two fields in the query filters area. I've selected equal to from the drop down next to the field names and then have the following options (Constant, Values From List, Prompt and Object).
Which option do I need to select in order to fit in your solution.
Help appreciated. TIA.

Similar Messages

Cannot make a calculation and put conditions

Hi,
I'm using Discoverer Desktop version 10.1.2.45 and I want to make a calculation and put a condition but I can't. When I select Tools --> Calculations from the menu it appears the calculation wizard. When I click to new button I should see a window to make the calculation but I see another window with the following message instead:
Operation incorrect. The operation couldn't be made. (Translation from Spanish).
This message also appears when I try to edit a calculation. I thought Discoverer was installed incorrectly so I decided to reinstall it. But the results are the same. I can't edit and make any calculation.
When I try to make a condition I select Tools --> Conditions and it appears the condition wizard. When I click new button I should see the window allows me to introduce a new condition but it doesn't appears me anything.
I have made the same operations (a calculation and a condition) using another computer with the same Discoverer Desktop version and it works correctly. But in this computer Discoverer is in English (we have all computers with Windows XP in spanish).
Why I can't make calculations and conditions?
Any suggestion would be appreciated.
Thanks.

I have the same problem, Discoverer works very well
two months ago, but now it does not work.
Have anyone solved this problem?
GreetingHas anything changed in the last 2 months? What is not working? Which version? Desktop, Plus, or Viewer?

Calculation in a Conditional Formatting

Do you know if it is possible to create a conditional format based on the result of a calculation?
I would like to use a calculation in the field "Value". The instructions to fill this field say: "Type a numeric value or select a value from the drop-down list". But my drop-down list is empty. Any idea?
Thanks

It is not possible. The value cannot be based off of another field. The only workaround that I can come up with would be to display the calculation in an adjacent column to the one you want to format, and set the format such that the background and foreground are the same color.
A few months ago, I thought this would be an easy way to highlight and entire row, but ran into this "problem".

Problem with calcule in SD conditions

Hello!
I´ve been created a new formula in VOFM>Formulas>Condition values.
In my include RV, i have this code:
data: v_value type p decimals 6.
Select * from konp into wa_konp....
v_value = wa_konp-kbetr / wa_konp-kpein.
Variables values are:
wa_konp-kbetr = 5.13
wa_konp-kpein = 1000
But, after this calcule, v_value return 0.000001
WHY??? What´s wrong in this code???
I try to do this same code in another report and v_value return right result (0.005130).
Please, somebody help me!!

Hello,
i´m trying somethings and just worst my situation.
Look that examples:
1º
v_value = '5.13' / 1000.
result: v_value = 0.000001
2º
v_value = '5.130000' / 1000.
result: v_value = 0.005130
3º
v_value = '5.130000' / 10000000.
result: v_value = 0.000001
I don´t understand what happen...
Please, somebody could explain me?
Edited by: Rodrigo Kenji Matsunaga on Aug 31, 2009 8:55 PM

Tax condition value is not calculating based on condition rate maintained

Hi,
I have maintained the condition rate as 4% for a condition type against a tax code in FV11. and also the validity period is correct.
But when I select the tax code in purchase order and click on taxes button, some other condition value is coming in condition value field for that condition type. for example the PO price is 100Rs. the condition value has to be 4% on 100Rs that is 4Rs. but some constant value is coming 5, even if change the condition rate in FV11 as 0%, the condition value is coming as 5 only.
Does anybody faced this issue.??

Hi
for example the PO price is 100Rs. the condition value has to be 4% on 100Rs that is 4Rs. but some constant value is coming 5, even if change the condition rate in FV11 as 0%, the condition value is coming as 5 only.
try this
change your PO value and then observed the changes ,IF then your are getting value different than 5 ,then i think there is no problem in your tax procedure because you are saying after 0% in FV11 also your are get 5 only in PO
as per me you can not put any constant value in tax procedure ,we only map how tax calculation will below for condition
and check your condition record for that vat condition again in FV13
Regads
Kailas ugale

MWST Calculation on Z condition Type

Hi,
We have a requirement for tax calculation as follows:
PR00                                        100
ZR00 (60 % of PR00)              60
MWST (10 % on ZR00)            6
Total (PR00 + MWST)               106
Our question is how we can achieve the tax calculation to happen on ZR00 ? Currently tax is getting calculated on PR00.
The MWST has the following standard settings:
MWST - Requirement                                                      - 10 &
             Alternative formula for condition base value     - 16
Please help !
Regards

Hello,
try with this:
- if you haven't already done, define a condition record for MWST condition in VK11 with the desired percentage;
- in the pricing procedure maintenace remove the alternative calculation formula corresponding to MWST condition;
- always in the pricing procedure maintenance, in the field "From" of the record MWST, enter the "Step" number corresponding to condition type ZR00;
Hope to be useful.
Best regards,
Andrea

Tax calculation for fright condition

Dears ,
I have this situation :
PB00 : 100
FRA1 : 10 %
ZAVS : 110
Total Price : 110
During the selection of tax code in invoice tab , I need to calculate tax like this
PB00 : 100
FRA1 : 10 %
ZAVS : 101
Total Price : 111
As Tax code applied for 10 % from gross price which means 10 EGP and 10 % tax from this is only 1 EGP
I hope I make it clear
Can I do this ?
Thanks and Regards
Rami

No what you are trying to say is not very clear.
If you mean you want to calculated the tax on ZAVS value and the tax should be 11 instead of 1, do the following:
1) In pricing M/08 assign a subtotal, say 4. This copies the value to KOMP-KZWI4
2) In your tax procedure OBQ3, use a calculation type to fetch the value from KOMP-KZWI4. The calculation type 362 does this but this is India specific, you may need to create something similar with some small ABAP

Sales taxes are being calculated on the conditions tab for service master

Hi All,
Create a PO for the following - Acct assignment cat F, item cat D, plant A001, CC USJ2, Pur org US10. Choose a service master. If you see in line item and check the conditions tab, you will find NAVS value is 0. Same NAVS value goes to EKPO-NAVNW where it is showing as 9% of the PO amount which actually should be 0. The scenario can be simulated by adding another line item copying an existing one. Now if we go to invoice tab and remove Jurisdiction code manually and then again put back the same Jur code, the problem vanishes.
BADI : EXTENSION_US_TAXES
Implementation Name : ZEXTENSION_US_TAXES
in this implementation we have 4 methods.
ME_CALCUL_SRV_TAX,MM_DATA_FOR_TAX_SYSTEM,ME_TAXCOM_MEPO,MM_ITEM_TAX_MODIFY,MS_TAX_DATA_LIMITS and MS_TAX_DATA_SERVICES.
But MM_ITEM_TAX_MODIFY, MS_TAX_DATA_LIMITS and MS_TAX_DATA_SERVICES are empty.
Please guide me in the right direction to resolve this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Raja
IBM.

Wrong assignment of P org with P grp is the route cause, found the error and rectified which is working fine.
Thanks and Regards,
Venkata Koppisetti.

Calculated measure with condition on 2 date dimensions

Hi,
I built a cube which has 2 different time dimensions, let's say Time1 and Time2 (which both have 2 levels : Year and month), and a measure we'll call measure1.
I would like to define a new measure as a calculated member, that would sum the values of measure1 only where Time1 <= Time2.
Should I write it in SQL, the query would be :
SELECT Sum(measure1)
FROM table
WHERE Time1 <= Time2
Seems to me that it would be an easy thing to do, but as a beginner with MDX I can't find anything that seems to work consistently.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance

When you expect to filter time like Time1 <= Time2, you can do it in MDX if it is from the same dimension and same attribute using the range operator ":".
But when it is different dimension you can achieve the same by filtering members from the dimensions. Select all members from dimension1 and dimension2 that you want to analyse, no need of creating new measure.
Theoretically speaking member x1 from dimenion1 is not same as member y1 from dimension2 and you cannot filter x1 on the basis of the y1.
Since I don't know exactly what is your scenario is, alternate approach is as below. It is a sample query, where I am expecting goods to be delivered the same day it is shipped.
with member [measures].[ship date] as Int([Ship Date].[Date].currentmember.Member_Key)
member [measures].[delivery date] as Int([Delivery Date].[Date].currentmember.Member_Key)
member [measures].[late shipping] as iif([measures].[delivery date]>[measures].[ship date],[Measures].[Sales Amount],0)
select {[Measures].[Sales Amount],[measures].[late shipping],[measures].[ship date],[measures].[delivery date]} on 0,
non empty{[Delivery Date].[Date].[Date]*[Ship Date].[Date].[Date]} on 1
from (
select ([Delivery Date].[Date].&[20030713],[Ship Date].[Date].&[20030708]) on 0
from [Step-by-Step])
http://www.bifeeds.com

Service Tax Calculation for Condition Types

Dear Experts,
In an Import Purchase Order for Coal, along with the Basic Price of the Coal, the following Conditions are also entered, in the Condition Types maintained in the Import Pricing Schema
-        Water front royalty
-          Port Dues
-          Berth Hire Charges
-          Port terminal charges
-          Surveyor charges
Each of these conditions may have a separate Vendor, hence the Purchase Order creator will select each condition and assign the required vendor.
Each of these conditions is subject to Service Tax, Educational Cess and Higher Secondary Educational Cess, the User want that separate service tax calculation be made available in the pricing schema for these individual conditions and the relevant vendor be assigned to these condition. the service tax on individual conditions be paid to the relevant vendor along with the basic value for the condition.
Separate Condition Types (15 nos.) for each of the above conditions for Service Tax, Educational Cess and Higher Secondary Educational Cess can be prepared and added in the pricing schema, the user will have to enter the percentages in the relevant conditions.
The user wants that the Service Tax be automatically calculated for these conditions, instead of manually entering the same. Please guide how can this be achieved.
Thanks in advance.
AJ

Hi,
For this you have to maintain the all your charges in your pricing procedure along with each charge you have to maintain 3 condition types for service and chesses.
Ex:
step counter cond.type des.                   from                 to
1 1 P000 Gross Price
1 2 P001 Gross Price
25 0 JM00 Water front royalty                 1
26 0 ser1 service                                  25
27 0 edu1 educationcess                      26
28 0 edu2 se.edu.cess ;                        26
29 0 jm01 Port Dues                                1
30 0 ser1 service                                   29
31 0 edu1 educationcess                       30
32 0 edu2 se.edu.cess                           30
like this you have to built your pricing procedure in a m/08. after that for you want the service tax automatically so for that you have to put the accesses sequence in you service condition types (ser, edu1,edu2).in m/06.
After that you have to maintain info record for that material and import vendor. in me11 in that in condition tab you have to maintain percentage for ser, edu1, edu2 . the system will calculate the service charges automatically.
Thanking you,

Condition formula for alternative calculation type

Hi gurus,
we need to create some condition formulas to be applied in our pricing procedure.
Do you know where to program them in the system and what additional settings are required?
Thanks and best regards,
VL

Hi Victor,
For your query, you can create new alternative calculation or alternative condition base values in T-COde VOFM with the help of an ABAP.
Go to VOFM T-CODE
Then Click on Formulas then condition value or condition base value.
You need to take Acces key from basis team to create a new calculation type for that number should start from 900 to 999.
Tell you Abaper to take the values from internal table XKOMV, XKOMK, KONDI, XKONP there are many internal tables are there, from that you will get respective conditon type values.
In internal table KBETR field contains condition record value & KWERT contains the calculated value.
Read wrt condition tyep and calculate according that and pass the value.
Try this, which will help you in resolving your query.
If satisfied close the thread.
Regards,
Nagesh

Tax Calculation of free goods

Hi
We have a requirement where the client wants only VAT to be posted in GL accounts and not the price.For this I tried free goods condition type R100 with AltCBV 28.But the VAT value is also coming zero. I want the VAT to be calculated on Pricing condition and then give 100% discount.
Apart from this I also tried to make pricing condition statistical and calculate VAT on it but then also system gives zero value for VAT.
Also wondering if the scenario can be addressed with Free of Change Dellivery.

Hi
Normally in scenario where you are dealing with samples , there are cases you have to charge only TAXES / EXCISE part.
Here my SUGGESTION is you can handle this through a simple sales order process, where you have to configure a new pricing procedure.
1. Create a new document type to handle samples.
2. Create a New pricing procedure where you can keep the basic price condtion as Statistical and rest all same as wht is is there your main pricing procedure. Just juggle with the TO-FROM to capture the TAX part in the total.
3. Doc pricing procedure will help you to pick the new Pricing procedure
4. Now Process this as a normal sales order
5. This new document type will help you to have a proper reporting.
The only constraint here is USER has to punch a fresh order seperately for such scenario. He cannot give a free good in the same sales order which is used as standard.
The other way is you can configure a FREE GOOD Determination procedure as suggested where you need to then have your Single pricing procedure accomodating the same scenario.
Thanks
RB

Excise not captured in the MIGO & Tax calculation is not correct in the PO.

Excise Settings completed.                    02.11.2007
a)     Configuration done as per J05 Building block.( Tax Procedure TAXINN)
b)     Maintained J1ID, all steps.
c)     Maintained tax code in FTXP.
d)     FV11  Maintained for Material, vendor, Plant in combination with Tax code input tax maintained in FTXP.
e)     Checked CIN Health, all tick are green.
f)     Given all G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type (ETT)
g)     Maintained all number Ranges.
Issue  1)
Tax calculation is not correct in the PO, tax tab
a)     JMIP is appearing 12% in condition amount, (as per condition record) but condition value is Zero, (Not calculated by the FI Pricing procedure). Screen shot for Pricing procedure, PO taxes and condition record given below.
b)     JIPC Sales tax 4% in condition amount (as per condition record) , calculated by the FI Pricing procedure is 8%, condition value is Rs 8 instead of Rs 4
Fi pricing procedure.
PO Taxes  wrong Tax calculated
FV11 Condition record
Issue  2)
While creating Goods receipt aginst PO (Tax code V2 in PO). Movement type 101, Excise tab appears at Header and Item level and we need to put the Vendors Excise Invoice and date, nothing is copied from the PO for Excise duty & sales tax.
Now we put the values for ED and Sales tax manually in the MIGO and saved the document. While display material document, excise tab is not there i.e. no excise related activiy is captured here in goods receipt.
If you need more detail, please revert on cell 093295 53235.
Please suggest.
Manish Gupta
93295 53235
[email protected]

Hai,
1.Check the condition types JMIP & JMIC in IMG - Financial accting New - FI AC Global settings - Taxes on sales and purchases - Check calculation procedure - Define condition type.
2.The condition types you have used are defined for non deductible taxes i.e., it gets inventorised, added to the material account.And also the accural key assigned to this condition types are NVV - defined for non ded input taxes.
3.Instead the condition types defined by SAP Standard system for BED & ST are JMOP & JIPS and the accurals assigned to this are VS1 & VS5.
If you want clear details mail the screen shots to my id [email protected]

Maintain the acct key and acurals/provisions in calculation schema-MIRO

Hi,
In PO we have maintained different delivery condition.
When we are doing MIRO we are getting error "maintain the acct key and acurals/provisions in calculation schema" for condition type YLBB and YLBE.
However we have checked condition type and calulation schema and found that acct key and accurals maintained.
YLB9     BivacInspec.fee/Quan
YLBB     LPRC charges/Quant.
YLBC     Port charges/Quant.
YLBE     Clearing Charges/Qt.
Please suggest somesolution.
Thanks
Ashok

Hi Ashok,
In M/08 check whether   acct key and acurals/provisions in calculation schema" for condition type YLBB and YLBE are maintained or not.
Also if they are maintained there then check in M/06 for condition type YLBB and YLBE , whether accurals check box are checked or not...If not check and then try.
Cheers!!!
Utsav

Tax not calculating in PO

HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj Saini

Hi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards

Calculation in a condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for