Calculation in Esbase System 9 slower than in 6.5

Hello,
I, ve the following problem I'll try to summarize:
We’ve migrated a database from Essbase 6.5 to System 9. The main calculation in the database consists in several FIX statements that are faster in the new version (according to the log), except one, that lasts 5 minutes in 6.5 and almost an hour in System 9.
This is the FIX:
FIX(@LEVMBRS (Products,0), @UDA("Business Unit", "ELIM"), &Current_Month, "Actual", &Current_Year, Eliminations, global)
Sales = @SUM( @UDA( "Business Unit", @NAME( @CURRMBR("Business Unit"))));
ENDFIX
I’ll try to explain the meaning of this FIX: For some members in the Business Unit dimension (Marked with the UDA “ELIM”) the sales are calculated as the sum of the sales of those Business Units marked with an UDA that is the same name as the Business Unit that it’s being calculated (@CURRMBR).
As an additional information, it’s interesting because the fix syntax is reported as “Invalid parameter type” by the syntax analyzer of the 6.5, but the calculation works correctly (in only five minutes). In System 9, on the contrary, the syntax is reported as correct, but the FIX lasts far more than in 6.5 (as I said, almost an hour).
Does anyone have any idea of what could be happenning? Do you know any alternate syntax for the sentence?
Thanks in advance for your help.

I experienced similar unexplained calc degradation going from essbase 6.5.1 to 7.1.5.
I had a calc statement similar to the one you are seeing degration on,
"Regular Hours" = "Dept. Minimum Hours Input"->@MEMBER(@CONCATENATE(@NAME(@ANCEST("Time Periods",4)), " GLOBAL DRIVER"));
I can't remember how I stumbled on this, but I did stumble on to the fact that the newer calc engine wasn't as efficient with resolving these functions. My statement was trying to resolve the "Time Periods" ancestor to it's 4 generation member, and concatenating that with " Gloabal Driver" which is a data input member. Since there are only 13 different "Periods" in my outline it wasn't too difficult for me to replace those functions with an IF statement checking which "Time Period" I was in (example)
If(@IsMbr("P01W1") OR @IsMbr("P01W2") OR @IsMbr("P01W3") Or @IsMbr("P01W4"))
"Regular Hours" = "Dept. Minimum Hours Input"->"Period 01 GLOBAL DRIVER";
ElseIf(@IsMbr("P02W1") OR @IsMbr("P02W2") OR @IsMbr("P02W3") Or @IsMbr("P02W4"))
"Regular Hours" = "Dept. Minimum Hours Input"->"Period 02 GLOBAL DRIVER";
Etc.
It meant a lot more typing, but it took my calc from 20 minutes to 2 minutes.
Hopefully you can do something similar to remove the functions.
Good Luck,
Robert

Similar Messages

  • SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SLOWER THAN EXPECTED

    The system performance is poor. Any tips?  Should I schedule a genius bar appointment?

    The system performance is poor.
    In what way?  Need details.  Please detail ALL you have done so far in the way of troubleshooting?   Need this info to avoid the been there done that scenarios.
    Any tips?
    Not until you provide details.
    Should I schedule a genius bar appointment?
    Not until we find out if it's necessary.
    OS X (10.6)
    Use Software Update or the OS 10.6.8 combo update to update your OS.  Also, update everything SU has to offer for your computer.  When done, repair permissions and restart your computer.

  • System seems slower after new hard disk installation.

    Dear all:
    After a recent hard disk crash that caused me to lose a lot of important professional and personal information I replaced my old defective hard disk (a Seagate Barracuda 1.0 TB internal SATA drive) with a new one (a Seagate Barracuda 1.5 TB internal SATA drive).
    The issue I am now experiencing may or may not be related to the new drive but I wanted to post it here and have your opinions about it. It seems to me that since this new hard disk was installed that my system is slower than it was before. Something else I noticed is that iTunes seems to hang every once in a little while, freezing and a while later resuming its operation (as if it were frozen while trying to read the information from its library located on the new hard disk ???).
    Since the capacity of the new disk has increased some 50% compared to the older one, could this be the issue ? Can the fact that the 1.5 TB hard disk are new technology be a reason why this is happening (some issues still not completely resolved) or could it be that the capacity being so much greater requires the drive to work harder at finding the data ?
    In case the information is relevant the drive's speed is 7200 rpm but I couldn't find any information (including Seagate's own web site) about its seek time spec.
    Something else I noticed is that since I've installed the two 1.5 TB internal drives the fans inside my G5 have become more noticeable, raising their speed to a noisy level every now and then depending on what I am doing with my computer. This didn't happened before when I had only one internal hard disk installed (my original purchase configuration) and when I had (2) internal 400 GB hard disks installed.
    Any ideas ?
    Thank you in advance.
    Joseph Chamberlain

    Turns out I used screws that were too long above the optical drive which blocked it...

  • URLClassLoader slower than system loader

    I'm subclassing URLClassLoader to load jar files on the local file system. I noticed that URLClassLoader loads about 30% slower than placing the jar files on the system class path. In my app, class loading performance in very important -even though it is just a one time hit.
    I suspect the URLClassLoader (which I believe is implemented mostly in Java on Sun's VM) is not leveraging the many performance optimziations that the system loader enjoys (which is probably implemented in native code).
    I also experience the same performance issue if I try to do jar loading myself using Java ZipFile i/o.
    Comments?

    well there is quite more overhead involved - loading from classpath of course is the most optimized one.

  • Why the system is very slow than before

     I have two computers, One is desktop, another is laptop,but I met the problems about the performance for the two
    computers, from last Monday, two computers speed are very slow, after I checked the task manager, I found the service(ntoskrnl.exe) used the 60-70% CPU resource, but why the ntoskrnl.exe cause this? I also download the tools and analysised it, but it seems
    that no useful information,how to find the root cause?
    summary all the information as below
    1.Suddenly this problems happened
    2. I closed the AVP (Kaspersky antivirus software), but it seems no improved for the performance
    3. I have closed the Windows search service, but no change for this
    4\I use the maxthon and Firefox browse
    , all the same thing happened.
    you can download the Log file from http://1drv.ms/WwTBhU

    Hi,
    Any update in this thread?
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/ce42930b-f0f3-4df7-a621-d8f9d59109b4/why-the-system-is-very-slow-than-before?forum=w8itpronetworking
    Regards
    Yolanda Zhu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Multihreading seems to run slower than multiple JVM

    Hello,
    I have a 4-core machine and I use windows XP.
    I build a java application that can launch a thread doing a series of heaving calculation.
    The thread takes 8sec to finish and the task manager indicate that 30% of CPU is in use.
    If I start 2 threads at the same time, each one finish in 14sec, using 40% of CPU.
    Now if I start 2 times my application, and run simultaneously 1 thread in each one, they all finish in 8 sec but using 60% of CPU.
    My question is why multithreading goes slower than running 2 JVM in parallel ? When running a profiler on the app, it doesn't seems to wait for shared ressources.
    Regarding the CPU usage, it seems that using one JVM doesn't use full available CPU.
    Is that a 'normal' behaviour, have you some explanation to it ?
    I hope I'm clear enough !
    Raphael

    I have digged it, and found the part of code that has this behaviour : intialization or copy of a big array.
    There is a piece of code showing this behaviour :
    public class TestParallel {
         public TestParallel() throws Exception {     
              Thread T1 = new Thread(new Worker());
              Thread T2 = new Thread(new Worker());
              Thread T3 = new Thread(new Worker());
              Thread T4 = new Thread(new Worker());
              long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
              T1.start();
              T1.join();
              T2.start();
              T2.join();
              System.out.println("Serial: " + (System.currentTimeMillis()-time) + " millis");
              time = System.currentTimeMillis();
              T3.start();
              T4.start();
              T3.join();
              T4.join();
              System.out.println("Parallel : " + (System.currentTimeMillis()-time) + " millis");
         public class Worker implements Runnable {
              public void run(){
                   long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
                   for (int i=0 ; i < 1000 ; i++){
                        double[] aBigArray = new double[500000];
                   System.out.println("Worker time : " + (System.currentTimeMillis()-time) + " millis");
         public static void main(String args[]){
              try{
                   new TestParallel();
              }catch (Exception e){
                   e.printStackTrace();
    }I imagine it's a normal behaviour, and there is no workaround.
    So I try another way, without array initialization but using System.arrayCopy. But I have the same problem.
    You can try by changing Worker runnable this way :
         public class Worker implements Runnable {
              public void run(){
                   double[] array1 = new double[500000];
                   double[] array2 = new double[500000];
                   Arrays.fill(array1, 0.03);
                   long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
                   for (int i=0 ; i < 1000 ; i++){                    
                        System.arraycopy(array1, 0, array2, 0, 500000);
                   System.out.println("Worker time : " + (System.currentTimeMillis()-time) + " millis");
         }I have this output :
    Worker time : 3625 millis
    Worker time : 3609 millis
    Serial: 7266 millis
    Worker time : 6531 millis
    Worker time : 6563 millis
    Parallel : 6594 millisSo two parallel thread working on different arrays with System.arraycopy take nearly twice as much time ???
    Edited by: RaphaelH on Jun 23, 2009 4:27 AM

  • Macbook pro system running slow - etrecheck shows issues - any idea how to apply fixes?

    Hi I normally consider myself pretty web savvy but I'm totally lost on what to do here. This computer has been running slow since I got it, but the harddrive went sideways recently. I've never worked with a recovered drive - which I apparently have as my terminal lists my workfolder-2 so....I'm guessing I'm pretty screwed. I learned about etrecheck through the forums here but don't understand how to apply it
    Would anyone help me understand what I need to do?
    Here's my etrecheck:
    Problem description:
    very slow osx system even with only one or two apps open - standard 2013 macbook pro
    EtreCheck version: 2.1.5 (108)
    Report generated January 1, 2015 9:52:46 PM EST
    Click the [Support] links for help with non-Apple products.
    Click the [Details] links for more information about that line.
    Click the [Adware] links for help removing adware.
    Hardware Information: ℹ️
      MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) (Verified)
      MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro9,2
      1 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 2-core
      4 GB RAM
      BANK 0/DIMM0
      2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
      BANK 1/DIMM0
      2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
      Bluetooth: Good - Handoff/Airdrop2 supported
      Wireless:  en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
    Video Information: ℹ️
      Intel HD Graphics 4000 - VRAM: 512 MB
      Color LCD 1280 x 800
    System Software: ℹ️
      OS X 10.8.5 (12F45) - Uptime: 4 days 8:16:35
    Disk Information: ℹ️
      APPLE HDD HTS545050A7E362 disk0 : (500.11 GB)
      disk0s1 (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / : 499.25 GB (310.25 GB free)
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>  [Recovery]: 650 MB
      HL-DT-ST DVDRW  GS31N disk1 : (369.9 MB)
      disk1s1 (disk1s1) <not mounted> : 54 MB
      disk1s2 (disk1s2) <not mounted> : 26 MB
      disk1s3 (disk1s3) <not mounted> : 34 MB
      disk1s4 (disk1s4) <not mounted> : 33 MB
      disk1s5 (disk1s5) <not mounted> : 65 MB
      disk1s6 (disk1s6) <not mounted> : 29 MB
      disk1s7 (disk1s7) <not mounted> : 26 MB
      disk1s8 (disk1s8) <not mounted> : 20 MB
      disk1s9 (disk1s9) <not mounted> : 36 MB
      disk1s10 (disk1s10) <not mounted> : 12 MB
      disk1s11 (disk1s11) <not mounted> : 35 MB
    USB Information: ℹ️
      Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
      Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
      Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
      Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
    Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
      Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Configuration files: ℹ️
      /etc/hosts - Count: 2
    Gatekeeper: ℹ️
      Mac App Store and identified developers
    Kernel Extensions: ℹ️
      /Applications/VMware Fusion.app
      [not loaded] com.vmware.kext.vmci (90.4.18) [Support]
      [not loaded] com.vmware.kext.vmioplug.10.1.24 (10.1.24) [Support]
      [not loaded] com.vmware.kext.vmnet (0104.03.86) [Support]
      [not loaded] com.vmware.kext.vmx86 (0104.03.86) [Support]
      [not loaded] com.vmware.kext.vsockets (90.4.23) [Support]
      /System/Library/Extensions
      [loaded] at.obdev.nke.LittleSnitch (4228 - SDK 10.8) [Support]
      [loaded] com.globaldelight.driver.BoomDevice (1.1 - SDK 10.1) [Support]
      [not loaded] com.waltop.iokit.driver.USBAtTablet (1.1.0) [Support]
    Problem System Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [failed] com.apple.accountsd.plist
      [failed] com.apple.CalendarAgent.plist
      [failed] com.apple.coreservices.appleid.authentication.plist
      [failed] com.apple.pbs.plist
      [failed] com.apple.printtool.agent.plist
      [failed] com.apple.tccd.plist
    Problem System Launch Daemons: ℹ️
      [failed] com.apple.wdhelper.plist
    Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [running] at.obdev.LittleSnitchUIAgent.plist [Support]
      [not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist [Support]
      [running] com.penpad.penpadtablet.plist [Support]
      [loaded] org.chromium.chromoting.plist [Support]
    Launch Daemons: ℹ️
      [running] at.obdev.littlesnitchd.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist [Support]
      [invalid?] com.adobe.SwitchBoard.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.github.GitHub.GHInstallCLI.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.daemon.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist [Support]
    User Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist [Support]
      [failed] homebrew.mxcl.postgresql.plist [Support]
    User Login Items: ℹ️
      Boom Application (/Applications/Boom.app)
      iTunesHelper Application (/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)
    Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
      JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 14.9.0 - SDK 10.7 Check version
      o1dbrowserplugin: Version: 5.38.6.0 - SDK 10.8 [Support]
      AdobeExManDetect: Version: AdobeExManDetect 1.1.0.0 - SDK 10.7 [Support]
      Silverlight: Version: 5.1.20513.0 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.246 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      WidevineMediaOptimizer: Version: 6.0.0.12757 - SDK 10.7 [Support]
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.1
      Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.246 - SDK 10.6 Mismatch! Adobe recommends 16.0.0.235
      googletalkbrowserplugin: Version: 5.38.6.0 - SDK 10.8 [Support]
      AdobePDFViewer: Version: 10.1.1 [Support]
      Autodesk123D32: Version: Autodesk123D32 1.0.6 - SDK 10.7 [Support]
      DirectorShockwave: Version: 12.1.3r153 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
    Safari Extensions: ℹ️
      Searchme [Installed] Adware! [Remove]
    3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
      remoting_host_prefpane  [Support]
      Flash Player  [Support]
    Time Machine: ℹ️
      Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
          3% coreaudiod
          2% Activity Monitor
          1% WindowServer
          1% activitymonitord
          1% Google Chrome
    Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
      168 MB Google Chrome
      49 MB Google Chrome Helper
      34 MB mds
      30 MB WindowServer
      26 MB Finder
    Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
      93 MB Free RAM
      1.39 GB Active RAM
      1.35 GB Inactive RAM
      1.45 GB Wired RAM
      48.43 GB Page-ins
      17.53 GB Page-outs

    Searchme [Installed] Adware! [Remove]
    Start by going to Safari/Preferences/Extensions and un-install the above.
    17.53 GB Page-outs
    Adding some RAM would help. Even though you haven't restarted for 4+ days, this is a little high. The 2 places I’ve seen recommended most to buy reliable RAM are below. I have purchased RAM several times from Other World Computing and have always been very satisfied with the product and service. They have on-line instructions on how to replace the RAM. OWC has also tested RAM above what Apple states is the maximum. I now have 6GB installed on a machine supposedly limited to 4 GB.
    Crucial
    Other World Computing
    Activity Monitor – Monitor Performance Problems  
    Performance Guide
    Why is my computer slow
    Why your Mac runs slower than it should
    Slow Mac After Mavericks
    Things you can do to resolve slowdowns  see post by Kappy

  • After updating to Mavericks, my mac seems slower than ever.

    Here is a report for my mac that maybe someone can help me figure out why.  Is something not compatible?
    Hardware Information:
    iMac (21.5-inch, Mid 2011)
    iMac - model: iMac12,1
    1 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 4 cores
    4 GB RAM
    Video Information:
    AMD Radeon HD 6750M - VRAM: 512 MB
    System Software:
    OS X 10.9.2 (13C64) - Uptime: 0 days 6:56:17
    Disk Information:
    ST3500418AS disk0 : (500.11 GB)
    EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
    Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 499.25 GB (133.53 GB free)
    Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
    HL-DT-STDVDRW  GA32N 
    USB Information:
    Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
    Apple Internal Memory Card Reader
    Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
    Apple Inc. BRCM2046 Hub
    Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
    Serato Serato Scratch LIVE(c)2004
    SCM Microsystems Inc. SCR3310 v2.0 USB Smart Card Reader
    FireWire Information:
    Thunderbolt Information:
    Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Kernel Extensions:
    com.serato.usb.kext     (2.3.0)
    Launch Daemons:
    [System]     com.adobe.fpsaud.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2.Agent.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.marketcircle.daylite.accessd.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.marketcircle.daylite.attachmentd.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.marketcircle.daylite.backupd.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.marketcircle.daylite.cardcald.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.marketcircle.daylite.portsd.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.marketcircle.daylite.staged.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.marketcircle.daylite.touchd.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist 3rd-Party support link
    Launch Agents:
    [System]     com.divx.dms.agent.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [System]     com.divx.update.agent.plist 3rd-Party support link
    User Launch Agents:
    [not loaded]     com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist 3rd-Party support link
    [not loaded]     com.citrixonline.GoToMeeting.G2MUpdate.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [not loaded]     com.divx.agent.postinstall.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [not loaded]     com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.diskSpaceWatcher.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [not loaded]     com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.scheduledScan.plist 3rd-Party support link
    [not loaded]     com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.trashWatcher.plist 3rd-Party support link
    User Login Items:
    iTunesHelper
    AdobeResourceSynchronizer
    Dropbox
    Internet Plug-ins:
    FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 12.0.0.77 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
    Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
    AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 11.0.06 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
    AdobePDFViewer: Version: 11.0.06 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
    Flash Player: Version: 12.0.0.77 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
    LogMeIn: Version: 1.0.961 - SDK 10.7 3rd-Party support link
    LogMeInSafari32: Version: 1.0.961 - SDK 10.7 3rd-Party support link
    QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
    SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
    Silverlight: Version: 5.1.20913.0 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
    Unity Web Player: Version: UnityPlayer version 4.3.4f1 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
    Safari Extensions:
    DivX Plus Web Player HTML5 <video>: Version: 2.1.2.172
    Amazon Shopping Assistant: Version: 1.1
    Ebay Shopping Assistant: Version: 1.1
    Searchme: Version: 1.2
    Audio Plug-ins:
    BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
    AirPlay: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.9
    AppleAVBAudio: Version: 203.2 - SDK 10.9
    iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
    iTunes Plug-ins:
    Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
    User iTunes Plug-ins:
    TuneUp Visualizer: Version: 2.4.0 - SDK 10.7 3rd-Party support link
    User Internet Plug-ins:
    CitrixOnlineWebDeploymentPlugin: Version: 1.0.105 3rd-Party support link
    Google Earth Web Plug-in: Version: 7.0 3rd-Party support link
    3rd Party Preference Panes:
    Flash Player  3rd-Party support link
    Old Applications:
    /Library/Application Support/Microsoft/MERP2.0
    Microsoft Error Reporting:     Version: 2.2.9 - SDK 10.4 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Ship Asserts:     Version: 1.1.4 - SDK 10.4 3rd-Party support link
    Solver:     Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    /Applications/Microsoft Office 2011/Office/Add-Ins/Solver.app
    SLLauncher:     Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    /Library/Application Support/Microsoft/Silverlight/OutOfBrowser/SLLauncher.app
    /Applications/Microsoft Office 2011/Office
    Microsoft Graph:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Database Utility:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Office Reminders:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Upload Center:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    My Day:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    SyncServicesAgent:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Open XML for Excel:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Alerts Daemon:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Database Daemon:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Chart Converter:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Clip Gallery:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Epson Printer Utility 4:     Version: 9.17 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    /Library/Printers/EPSON/InkjetPrinter2/Utility/UT4/Epson Printer Utility 4.app
    /Applications/Microsoft Office 2011
    Microsoft PowerPoint:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Excel:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Outlook:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Word:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Document Connection:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    Microsoft Language Register:     Version: 14.3.2 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
    /Applications/Microsoft Office 2011/Additional Tools/Microsoft Language Register/Microsoft Language Register.app
    BrFirmDataProvider:     Version: 1.0.4 - SDK 10.4 3rd-Party support link
    /Applications/Brother/Utilities/Firmware Update Tool/BrIfax/resources/BrFirmDataProvider.app
    Microsoft AutoUpdate:     Version: 2.3.6 - SDK 10.4 3rd-Party support link
    /Library/Application Support/Microsoft/MAU2.0/Microsoft AutoUpdate.app
    /Applications/iWork '09
    PDF Toolkit:     Version: 1.6 - SDK 10.0 3rd-Party support link
    Time Machine:
    Skip System Files: NO
    Mobile backups: OFF
    Auto backup: NO - Auto backup turned off
    Volumes being backed up:
    Macintosh HD: Disk size: 464.96 GB Disk used: 340.60 GB
    Destinations:
    Data [Network] (Last used)
    Total size: 2 
    Total number of backups: 91
    Oldest backup: 2012-12-11 04:35:50 +0000
    Last backup: 2014-03-03 17:10:05 +0000
    Size of backup disk: Excellent
    Backup size 2  > (Disk size 464.96 GB X 3)
    Time Machine details may not be accurate.
    All volumes being backed up may not be listed.
    Top Processes by CPU:
        14%     iTunes
        4%     WindowServer
        1%     Dock
        1%     Mail
        0%     coreaudiod
    Top Processes by Memory:
    274 MB     Mail
    187 MB     iTunes
    147 MB     mds_stores
    74 MB     softwareupdated
    45 MB     Safari
    Virtual Memory Information:
    31 MB     Free RAM
    906 MB     Active RAM
    897 MB     Inactive RAM
    893 MB     Wired RAM
    7.59 GB     Page-ins
    1.55 GB     Page-outs

    Try removing CleanMyMac. The OS cleans up after itself.
    Myth of the Dirty Mac
    CleanMyMac - Uninstall
    CleanMyMac2 Un-install
    Activity Monitor - Mavericks
    Activity Monitor in Mavericks has significant changes
    Performance Guide
    Why is my computer slow
    Why your Mac runs slower than it should
    Slow Mac After Mavericks
    Things you can do to resolve slowdowns  see post by Kappy

  • PS CS3 much slower than CS2 on Intel Mac. I don't get it.

    Yes, very very strange.
    I work with very large files, so I just got a spiffy new Mac Pro. It's my first Intel machine, so I expected that CS2 would drag a little bit, due to Rosetta. In fact, moving from one processor to eight of them seems to have much more than compensated. Nevertheless, I ordered CS4 and while I wait I downloaded the demo of CS3.
    I expected that CS3 would fly (no Rosetta) but have found my test tasks taking an inordinate amount of time... much slower than CS2 on the same Xeon workstation, and slower than CS2 on my old iMac (single 2.1GHz G5)
    Since I work with extremely large files, I got a hardware RAID5 made up of four 15,000RPM SAS drives. I can't get enough RAM to avoid using scratch disk, so I attacked the biggest performance bottleneck. I did get 8GB of RAM; would have gotten more, but I read that it won't matter until CS goes 64-bit in CS5 at the earliest.
    The rest of it: dual quad-core 2.8GHz "Woodcrest" Xeon processors, NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT graphics card, OS X 10.5.5, all updates (Apple and Adobe) applied as of 6pm Wednesday October 8th.
    I'm running two tests as my benchmark: open a file (PSD created with CS2, 75" x 75" at 400ppi, two layers, RGB with one additional channel) and resize to 75" x 75" at 800ppi. Once that is done, I rotate the new, massive file counterclockwise 18.5 degrees.
    On my old setup, 2.1GHz SP G5 iMac with CS2, these tasks took 38m 30s and 1h 33m 22s respectively.
    New machine with CS2: 10m 09s and 29m 14s respectively
    New machine with CS3: 42m 38s and 1h 36m 24s
    (above tests run repeatedly: these numbers are the fastest numbers for each configuration)
    I have nothing else running for these tests, except for Activity Monitor. What I've observed with Activity Monitor: the old G5 was pegged at (or very near) 100% CPU the whole time. Mac Pro with CS2, Photoshop ran most of the time on one CPU at a time, but spiked up as high as 250% CPU usage just for Photoshop.
    I haven't seen Photoshop CS3 use more than 80% of one processor the whole time on the Mac Pro. Mostly it sits around 35%.
    One more informal test: if I open that same file and downsample from 400ppi to 200ppi, CS2 does it in 1m 40s. CS3: 6m 57s. I don't have the iMac any more so I can't tell you how long it would take there.
    In both CS2 and CS3 the scratch disk is my startup volume, but it's a RAID. I can't add any more drives except for external drives. I could have configured it to one dedicated system drive and a second scratch volume made up of the remaining three drives, but I consulted with people who know RAID better than I do who agreed that since everything is going through the SCSI controller and everything gets written to multiple drives in order to make it faster that I'd get a performance hit by splitting the RAID into two volumes, even if multiple processes are trying to get at the same drive array. Even adding a Firewire 800 drive for scratch would be slower than using the RAID. Or so I've been told.
    So, this seems absurd. CS3 is not using Rosetta, right? So it should be flying on my machine. What on earth could I have done to a fresh CS3 (demo) install to make it slower than CS2 on my old G5? Is the CS3 demo crippled? Is there a conflict having CS2 and the CS3 demo on the same machine?
    I'm stumped.

    >Ya see, this is the attitude you really, really should get over. The Photoshop CS3 (10.0.1) code is just fine... it's your system (hardware/software) which, for some reason is not providing an optimal environment.
    Jeff, I agree completely. You seem to be assuming that I actually think Adobe wrote bad code. In fact, I believe Adobe did NOT write bad code (and I wrote that) but that the condition that you are suggesting (CS3 being slowed by having having scratch and system on the same volume to a far greater extent than CS2) could only be caused by bad code by Adobe. Since I believe that, as you say, a universal difference of this magnitude between CS2 and CS3 would be noticed by huge numbers of users, I doubt that what I am seeing is the result of having scratch and system on the same volume.
    In case I'm being less than clear:
    Scratch and system were on the same volume for CS2.
    Scratch and system were on the same volume for CS3.
    On my system CS2 performs tasks three to four times faster than CS3.
    ergo, either there is some problem other than scratch and system being on the same volume (perhaps something that exacerbates the scratch/system/same volume issue, OK, I accept that possibility) or else the change has been between CS2s and CS3s handling of scratch disks.
    If for the sake of argument we rule out the possibility that CS3 handles the condition of scratch and system being on the same volume worse than CS2 does, the only possibility left is that there is SOMETHING ELSE WRONG WITH MY SYSTEM.
    I am trying to find out what that other thing is. You're the one insisting that scratch and system being on the same volume is the cause of the CS3 slowdown. Accusing me of not believing that there's something wrong with my system misses the mark entirely. I ABSOLUTELY believe there is something wrong with my system.
    > Your RAM tests sound pretty thorough, but if I had your large-files workflow I would buy two (or preferably 4) 4-GB sized matched RAM DIMMs, remove all the existing RAM, and install only the new RAM to further test whether or not the old RAM is anomalous.
    Thanks Allen,
    Actually, this is exactly what I've done, though in a different order. My system shipped with two 1GB chips. I bought two 4GB chips from OWC and installed them, and found my CS2 performance to increase significantly. It was only then that I tried installing the CS3 demo. When I found CS3 running my tests more slowly than expected, I pulled the new RAM out and tried with just the original 2GB and tested both CS2 and CS3 again. Then I took the original 2GB out, put only the new RAM in and tested CS2 and CS3 again, finding the same results. Currently I have all 10GB in the system and for the moment I'm setting aside the possibility of a problem with the RAM (or at least setting aside the possibility that the RAM chips are just plain bad) because that would indicate that both the new and the old RAM are both bad in the same way. That seems unlikely.
    So I guess I'll have to drag the system down to the Genius Bar if I don't see an improvement from rearranging my hard drives.
    The update there is that last night I backed up my system, and this morning I deleted my RAID5 set, blowing away everything on my system until I can restore from backup. The new configuration is 1 JBOD drive plus three drives attached as RAID0.
    Unfortunately, neither of the new volumes is visible when I go to restore from backup. For the moment, this little experiment has cost me my entire system. The upshot is that it may be some more time before I have any more information to share. Even when I do get it working again, I can expect restoring to take the same 12 hours that backing up did.
    I will certainly post here when I've got my system back.

  • Why is InDesign CC significantly SLOWER than CS6?

    InDesign CC is noticeably SLOWER in almost every aspect and functionality than is the latest version of InDesign CS6 on my computer (OSX 10.9.4, 2.66 GHz Intel Core i5, 8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3, 27 inch iMac). I have stopped using Indesign CC and now only use CS6 to create and adjust documents.
    Can any staff or special users in this forum detail ADOBE's understanding or response to complaints of this nature?
    This situation does not bode well for me, given the coerced direction Adobe is taking users of its creative suite (towards cloud based subscription systems).

    I rebuilt all my preferences and that led to some kind of discovery. Starting InDesign CC everthing works ok (though the drawing tools are slightly slower than in CS6, creating a new page for example is much faster). All the following things mainly have an impact on drawing tools (pen tool, rectangle tool etc. placing multiple images is also affected but maybe because an image frame has to be drawn). After activating the application frame things start to slow down a bit. If I open the collapsed panels on right side things get slowed down again and the biggest hit on performance is evident when the information panel is open.
    I wanted to record a screen-capture again but this is so slow that it does not represent the bug accurately. And I guess this has something to do with the user interface because all is linked to interface actions (application frame, opening/collapsing panels, showing the information panel)
    Once again my system specs (when experiencing the issues half of my RAM was still free with Safari, Mail and InDesign CS6 and CC open for comparison):
    InDesign CC (German)
    Mac OS 10.8.4
    MacBook Pro 17inch
    8 GB RAM
    2.66 GHz Intel Core i7
    500 GB HD (200 GB free)

  • 24" iMac running slower than when I bought it.

    24" iMac running slower than when I bought it.

    It would help us to help you if we could have some more technical info about your iMac.
    If you so choose, Please download, install and run Etrecheck.
    Etrecheck was developed as a simple Mac diagnostic reporting tool by a regular Apple Support forum user and technical support contributor named Etresoft.
    Etrecheck is a small, unobstrusive app that compiles a static snapshot of your entire Mac hardware system and installed software.
    This is a free app that has been honestly created to provided help in diagnosing issues with Macs running the new OS X 10.9 Mavericks.
    It is not malware and can be safely downloaded and installed onto your Mac.
    http://www.etresoft.com/etrecheck
    Copy/paste and post its report here in another reply thread so that we have a complete profile of your Mac's hardware and installed software so we can all help with your Mac performance issues.
    Thank You.

  • I just restored my 24 inch imac and it seems to be running MUCH slower than before. Any Ideas why? thanks in advance for your help!

    I have erased and restored my 24 inch Intel iMac. I have upgraded to the last version of X os. My system is running WAY slower than it was before. Even opening windows seems to lag and the spinning wheel come up for everything. Every task is slow, even typing this! lol
    Here are my specs:
    Model Name:          iMac
      Model Identifier:          iMac8,1
      Processor Name:          Intel Core 2 Duo
      Processor Speed:          2.8 GHz
      Number Of Processors:          1
      Total Number Of Cores:          2
      L2 Cache:          6 MB
      Memory:          4 GB
      Bus Speed:          1.07 GHz
      Boot ROM Version:          IM81.00C1.B00
      SMC Version (system):          1.30f1
    Any ideas would be helpful. Is this a hardware issue?
    Thanks!

    Matt:
    Thanks for the update. It is good to know that the maintenance procedures helped. Regular maintenance and a good backup are key to computer security. Gulliver's article has a suggested schedule. Dr. Smoke's FAQ on Backup and Recovery has excellent information and advice. I part company with him on his insistence on Retrospect, which I have found to be difficult to use. SuperDuper has been shown the best backup software in these tests.
    If you usually leave your computer on or asleep, it is good practice to shut down and start up in Safe Mode occausionally. I do it about once weekly.
    Good luck.
    cornelius
    Message was edited by: cornelius

  • Whould reinstalling the operating system fix, slowness of the macbook pro

    Whould reinstalling the operating system fix, slowness of the macbook pr

    It's best to describe the problem, in as much detail as possible, rather than your conclusions as to what's causing it or how it should be solved.

  • Zimbra 8.0.3_GA_5664.FOSS mail in and out become slow than usual.

    Hi,
    I am using zcs 8.0.3_GA_5664.FOSS. Few days back i observe that my server working slow than usual. I found that zmconfigd not runnig or sometime running but mail input and output is slow. I google the issue and some people said to change/disable the line /etc/hosts ipv6 line ":: 1     localhost.localdomain........". I did that but still slow.
    Can anyone suggest to speed it up like before.
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

    Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
    The title of the Console window should be All Messages. If it isn't, select
              SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ All Messages
    from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
              View ▹ Show Log List
    from the menu bar at the top of the screen. Click the Clear Display icon in the toolbar. Then take one of the actions that you're having trouble with. Select any messages that appear in the Console window. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
    The log contains a vast amount of information, almost all of which is irrelevant to solving any particular problem. When posting a log extract, be selective. A few dozen lines are almost always more than enough.
    Please don't indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
    Please don't post screenshots of log messages—post the text.
    Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

  • System gradually slowing down?

    I hope I'm not picking up a topic which has been discussed a gazillion times, but I couldn't find my specific questions after doing some searches. There's a few things I won't to clear about Mac OS.
    I have a MBP 2009 with 4GB mem and 500GB HD. It still runs smoothly however it defenitly runs slower than in the beginning. I guess that's a bit normal (more programs, files, mails, junk,...).
    I've been a PC user most of my life and switched about a year ago. i'm happy. I always found it necessary to do a reinstall of the OS on a pc every 1-2 years (even though I try to keep my stuff very clean). I'm curious how this effects on Mac OS?
    If I would do a reinstall, let's say from a Time Machine Backup (so with all my files, programs, mails, settings etc.), would the system run exactly the same or are there some core OS operations that will run 'smoother' after a re-install (with a TM backup). (I guess for a PC that would be a clean registry and not having 'unknown' processes/programs loading at the back).
    Also, is having installed a lot of applications (even when they are not running) slowing down the system. I guess it shouldn't as long as there's enough disk space.
    And then finally, do disks slow down after a while. Is having a 10% full HD (much) faster then 60% full (mine is around 60%). also disk defrag is no longer 'necessary' in the latest versions of Mac OS but I just can't imagine that after +1y heavy usage some files are "spread out".. (I'm no expert on file systems so I could expect an answer as: "no, EXT FS doesn't have fragmentation"
    Anyways, these are a few doubts I still have around a Mac OS system slowing down:
    -reinstall OS (this one particularly since i'm thinking of upgrading to new laptop, and wonder if I should start from scratch and copy manually or use my Time Machine backup to reinstall)
    -having many apps (not running)
    -disk fragmentations, or just hardware slowing down
    cheers!
    Philippe

    If you have not already done so, run Disk Utility's "Verify Disk" & "Repair Permissions" steps on your HD. All utilities that do permissions repairs use exactly the same built-in function of the OS to do so, so it doesn't matter if you do this through Onyx, Disk Utility, or Disk Warrior.
    The verify/repair disk step is a bit different: all utilities use the same method of detecting file system errors but (for example) Disk Warrior rebuilds file system directories from scratch (including perfectly useable ones), which often can repair damage Disk Utility can't, & has a side benefit of simplifying directory structures. Once, back when HD's were much slower & less sophisticated than they are now, this could make a large difference in file system performance. Now, it is debatable that an otherwise OK directory structure would show a noticeable improvement.
    IOW, if your HD's file system is healthy or only has minor problems, Disk Warrior won't do much of anything of real value that Disk Utility can't, but it can be a lifesaver if Disk Utility can't repair certain kinds of problems it can detect.
    The same is true for file fragmentation -- unless the drive is full of very fragmented files, defragmenting it probably won't show much real world improvement.
    The number of inactive applications on your Mac makes almost no difference in performance. What can easily do so is the number of active processes running at any given time. As a former PC users, you may not fully appreciate the difference between quitting an app & closing all its windows. Closing all an app's windows is somewhat like old TSR (terminate & stay resident) DOS programs -- it is still using some system resources, although not as many as when it is active. So, if you aren't already doing so, remember to quit applications you do not plan on reusing for a while.
    Just as importantly, don't load down the OS with a lot of unnecessary add-ons, especially ones that modify the user interface in some way. Each of these things uses some system resources; a few can destabilize the OS, causing recoverable code exceptions you may not be aware of without searching through system logs but still creating extra work for the CPU.
    If or when you remove add-ons or applications, be sure to check the documentation for the proper way to do that. If you don't, you may leave behind files that impact performance.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can i upgrade icloud storage for secondary account?

    My secondary account is used mostly for email.  I deleted a ton of them but somehow am still voer the 5GB limit. I'm willing to pay the $100 upgrade to get rid of the hassle, but is theere a way to upgrade icloud storage for your secondary account?

  • I downloaded upd-pcl6-x64-6.0.0 18849 for my LJ2605dn and it installed OK but cannot find my printer

    My LJ2605dn would not duplex so I updated to the universal print driver 6.0.0. My HP H5Z15AA PC now cannot find the printer. If I select the LJ2605dn pcl6 icon in device manager, it will find the printer and print but only in black and white This que

  • Windows install goes nowhere; OS X can't boot

    Hello, This morning I used Bootcamp Assistant to create a 32GB partition. I inserted my Windows 7 DVD and let the assistant reboot my iMac. It got to a blank grey screen and never went any further. I heard the CD drive spin down, and it never made an

  • Acrobat reader XI won't start

    Hello, For quite some time now I am unable to open Adobe acrobat reader / any other PDF file. When I open it, in windows task manager I can see there is a running process, but it stays like that. I have tried uninstalling, restarting my pc and reinst

  • Cisco SA 520 "Could not read headers"

    Hello We've recently purchased an SA 520 and have problems with a few websites as the Cisco device returns an error: /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; ms