Calculation with additional costs

Hi all,
we have a calculation based on info records. The calculation is done based on condition PB00 for the main vendor.
The Problem is: for some products we have additional costs from other intermediate vendors.
For example:
Main vendor has a condition PB00 for 10€ / KG
for that main vendor we have some Partners defined in Transaction MK03 (Partner SP for Transport as example)
While calculating the Price, the System should get the PB00 Price for the main vendor and also the other Z... conditions for the SP Partner.
This should be done depending on Material or purchaseing Organisation.
Any Suggestion ?
Thanks in advance for any help..
Kind regards
Fred

Hi Mukthar,
I Need the condition PB00 from the main vendor + the conditions from the SP vendor in the calculation. Not only the condition from one or the from the other one.
If I Change the vendor at GR, I will only have the condition from the new vendor.
regards
Fred

Similar Messages

Product calculation in combination with additive cost and mixed costing

Hello all,
I want to calculate trading good. I have defined a mixed costing for this article. Additional I had entered additive costs for the same article. When I run the calculation, it works only with the definitions of the mixed costing. Does the calculation take either the mixed costing or the additive cost?
Best regards
Jürgen

We also faced similar issue & had approched SAP for the same. As clarified by SAP, additive cost with mixed costing is not supported.
You may try using reference costing variant for this.
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar

With remote_os_authent being deprecated, will replacement come with additional cost?

One of our applications uses AD with remote_os_authent for single sign on (for some users) to the underlying database.
The database is currently on 9iR2 but will soon be moved to 11gR2 - with remote_os_authent now deprecated, I am under the impression from the vendor that one has to now add Oracles Access Manager with it's extra cost now that remote_os_authent is being phased out.
The vendor's app is tied in with Microsoft Active Directory to pass along credentials to implement single sign on, as a result of remote_os_authent being deprecated they tell me many of their customers are balking at purchasing an additional license(s) so they have now ported the application to use MSSQL database for a back end, as MSSQL provides integration with AD at no extra cost. This is an option I have been asked to look into as well, if there is going to be an extra cost to what we've already been using at no cost.
I've not had a lot of experience with remote_os_authent, and am confused if integrating database logins with AD specifically requires the remote_os_authent parameter or one can create a user identified externally and have AD pass the domain credentials without the remote_os_authent parameter. We have EE licensing and if I have to purchase an additional product at an additional cost now then I'll likely look at having them port the app to use MSSQL as well.
Anyone else running into this?
thanks in advance

Anything regarding licensing, please check with your friendly sales rep.
You may need to skip 11g and go straight to 12c.
Oracle Database Editions
"Enterprise User Security is an EE feature for directory-based management of database users. It does require a corresponding Oracle Identity Management Directory Services Plus to be licensed.
Usage of Enterprise User Security with Oracle Database strong authentication (PKI, Kerberos) no longer requires Oracle Advanced Security to be licensed"
As far as I know: kerberos === Windows 2008+ AD
Again - anything regarding licensing, please check with your friendly sales rep.

Onhand materials with additional cost query

Hello!
I'm stuck with a query and i need help.
The query needs to show the current onhand quantity of the material with costs , expire dates , lot numbers , warehouse codes , expire dates , arrival dates.
The actual query is :
SELECT
OOD.ORGANIZATION_NAME "ORG_NAME",
MOQD.SUBINVENTORY_CODE "WHS_CODE",
MSI.SEGMENT1 "Item Code",
MSI.DESCRIPTION "Item Name",
MSI.PRIMARY_UOM_CODE "ME",
SUM(MOQD.TRANSACTION_QUANTITY) "On Hand",
MTLN.LOT_NUMBER "LOT",
mln.expiration_date "Exp. date",
mln.attribute1 "PO number",
MAX(mmt.transaction_date) "Arrival date",
SUM( MMT.ACTUAL_COST) "Item cost"
--,SUM ( occe.cost_base_amount) "Etc. cost",
--oct.trx_quantity "Quantity"
FROM
MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSI
--, oaes_cogs_cost_elements occe
--, oaes_cogs_transactions oct
,ORG_ORGANIZATION_DEFINITIONS OOD
, MTL_ONHAND_QUANTITIES_DETAIL MOQD
,mtl_material_transactions MMT
,mtl_transaction_lot_numbers mtln
,mtl_LOT_NUMBERS MLN
WHERE
MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID=OOD.ORGANIZATION_ID
--and oct.cost_key = mln.attribute1
--and occe.element_type = 'INVOICE'
--and occe.cost_key = oct.cost_key
--and mmt.transaction_id = oct.trx_id
--and oct.trx_type = 'RECEIPT'
and mtln.inventory_item_id = mln.inventory_item_id
and mtln.lot_number = mln.lot_number
and mtln.organization_id = mln.organization_id
AND MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID=MOQD.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
AND MMT.TRANSACTION_ID = MTLN.TRANSACTION_ID
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID=MOQD.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID=MMT.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID=MMT.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
AND MOQD.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MMT.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
AND MOQD.ORGANIZATION_ID = MMT.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND MOQD.create_transaction_id=MMT.transaction_id
AND OOD.ORGANIZATION_ID = MMT.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND OOD.ORGANIZATION_ID = MOQD.ORGANIZATION_ID
GROUP BY
MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID,
OOD.ORGANIZATION_NAME,
MOQD.SUBINVENTORY_CODE,
MSI.SEGMENT1,
MSI.DESCRIPTION,
MSI.PRIMARY_UOM_CODE,
MTLN.LOT_NUMBER,
mln.expiration_date,
mln.attribute1
--,oct.trx_quantity
ORDER BY 1, 3, 4
If i connect oct and octe it will only show a few lines not all
Thank you for your help in advanced ,
Zsolt

I tried. And here is the result :
It seems that there is no record in table mtl_cst_actual_cost_details with the same transaction_id as in mtl_material_transactions table, but i found something strange.
I found a data where the actual cost transaction id is equal to material transaction transfer transaction id. the date is equal also the item id BUT with the same wrong price
I got this query from an oracle report the following queries which actually shows the correct price but only for thoose items which has got some extra cost on it :
select teny_s6 ,
bev_egys t1,
bev_egys + sum(teny_ktg)/menny t_onk,
bev_egys * menny tm1,
bev_egys * menny + sum(teny_ktg) tm_onk
from
select e.cost_key        teny_s6,
substr(g.segment2,6,1) ktg_tip,
t.trx_quantity         menny,
t.bev_egys             bev_egys,
sum(e.cost_base_amount) teny_ktg
from
oaes_cogs_cost_elements   e,
gl_code_combinations      g,
(select distinct tc.cost_key, tc.trx_quantity, mmt.actual_cost bev_egys
   from oaes_cogs_transactions tc,
        mtl_material_transactions mmt
   where
     tc.trx_id = mmt.transaction_id
     and tc.trx_type = 'RECEIPT') t
where e.cost_ccid = g.code_combination_id
and e.element_type = 'INVOICE'
and t.cost_key = e.cost_key
and substr(g.segment2, 1, 5) = '26211'
group by e.cost_key, substr(g.segment2,6,1), t.trx_quantity, t.bev_egys
group by teny_s6, bev_egys, menny
This query shows the right costs but only shows the netto price :
select
nvl(t.cost_key, ln.attribute1)      s6,
To_Char(nvl(MAX(t.trx_date), MAX(mmt.transaction_date)), 'DD-MON-YYYY') bev_datum,
nvl(MAX(t.trx_quantity), SUM(mmt.primary_quantity)) menny,
mmt.transaction_uom   me,
mmt.currency_code     devn,
mmt.currency_conversion_rate arfolyam,
mmt.actual_cost       bev_egys,
mmt.actual_cost / decode(nvl(mmt.currency_conversion_rate, 0), 0, 1,
      mmt.currency_conversion_rate) elk_dev_egys,
mmt.actual_cost * nvl(MAX(t.trx_quantity), SUM(mmt.primary_quantity)) bem
from
mtl_material_transactions mmt,
mtl_transaction_lot_numbers tln,
mtl_lot_numbers ln,
oaes_cogs_transactions t
where mmt.transaction_id = tln.transaction_id
and mmt.organization_id = tln.organization_id
and tln.organization_id = ln.organization_id
and mmt.inventory_item_id = tln.inventory_item_id
and tln.inventory_item_id = ln.inventory_item_id
and tln.lot_number = ln.lot_number
and mmt.transaction_type_id in (18, 41)
and nvl(ln.attribute1, '?') = t.cost_key
and t.trx_id(+) = mmt.transaction_id
-- AND t.cost_key(+) = :P_KALK_EGYSEG
AND t.trx_type(+) = 'RECEIPT'
AND t.inventory_item_id = mmt.inventory_item_id
-- and ln.attribute1 = '9529_120-0011-1_9398'
and ln.attribute1 = '9581_120-0164-3_9446'
GROUP BY t.cost_key, mmt.actual_cost, -- mmt.transaction_date, t.trx_date,
ln.attribute1, mmt.transaction_uom, mmt.currency_code,
mmt.currency_conversion_rate, mmt.actual_cost

Additive cost not seen in production order and while settling hits PRD

I am using additive costs for my product costing via CK74n.
Cost estimate looks good since I have the valuation variants setup to include additive costs.
But when I see the production order that is being created, all others costs are being considered except additive costs. They are recognized but not as a line item instead as a variance. When I settle the order the costs actually hit price difference account and not even the GL account that I had assigned for the additive cost. SAP did not consider the cost as variance even if it was showing up as variance initially. This as I understood is partly because of the settlement rule that I have in place which tells SAP to go and settle on the material (which is standard SAP to do since I want all the costs from the production order to settle on the eventual material going into stock) so SAP went on to settling on the material. Since the material is set as standard price the variance is being booked as a price difference entry.
Ideally I would have expected the additive cost getting debited to the order and credited to the gl account that I assigned for the additive cost. The eventual cost (incl. additive cost) should hit the inventory.
Am I missing a step?

Hi Sapluver,
Appreciate your prompt response..Please see my response in italics
Few queries related to your post.
1. So your standard cost got two part, one with quantity structure ( materials, labor, OSC etc) which the system cost automatically and one manual part, which is your additive cost. While costing system picks up this manual part from CK74N.
I hope this part you got correct. Yes, the cost estimate is reading from both the qty structure and the additive costs and the cost roll-up is coming up correctly
2. Now in actual cost controlling, i think System is not sure how to valuate your additive cost actual part.I agree, the additive cost does appear in the cost analysis section of the production order but does not show up as a line item initially. Instead it comes up as a difference item right in the bottom of the screen after totals have been displayed without any line item reference. As if the system is not sure how to display the line item. Once I have done the material issuance confirmation to the order, the additive cost got picked up correctly as I have set it up in the cost component structure as material overhead but again shows up only as variance
Which method you used to debit your production order with additive cost, is it a normal journal entry or through some automatic posting through routing ( example OSC through Purchase order/Good Receipt).I probably need to understand your point more clearly? I am not manually debiting the production order at all for the additive cost. I was expecting SAP to debit the order the same way it does for overheads. Overheads too initially show up as variance but then when we run the overhead calculation KGI2 the overheads costs get debited to the production order. Was expecting similar behavior for additive costs. I am receiving the finished product from the production order into stock via MIGO goods receipt movement type 101. I was expecting the debit to happen perhaps at the time of settlement via CO88 but here the system posted it to the price difference account via account key PRD. This I understand the system did because the settlement rule is set to post all the costs on the material and the material has the valuation control as standard price; so the system is seeing the additive cost as a price difference hence posting it to the price difference account.
System is unaware of the additive cost from actual cost point of view, there is no specification to additive cost from costing variant for actual cost. So you have to debit the order with the additive cost part.So do I manually debit the order with the additive cost? What about the price difference additive cost sitting on the order? Would appreciate if you can tell me the process steps for posting this correctly
regards
Sapluver

Please note that i am seeking some assistance with adding the followng resource: A maximum of 4 resources can be added at an additional cost of $500 per day per resource.

Hi, Please note that i am seeking some assistance with adding the following resource to a task in Microsoft Project 2010:
A maximum of 4 resources can be added at an additional cost of $500 per day per resource.

Hi Clemence,
Your post has quite little details, but as far as I understand, you want to add 4 resources on a task, each resource costing 500$ a day. Since it is not mentionned if it is generic resources (skill or role) or named resources, I'll assume that it is generic
resources. Based on this understanding, here is a proposal:
Go to the resource sheet,
Create a work generic resource ("type" field set to "work", "generic" field to "yes"), typing in the resource name field the skill name,
In the max unit field, enter 400% for 4 resources (for just 4 if your Project 2010 is configured to display units in decimals),
Since the rate is an hourly rate, make the calculation : 500$ per day / 8 hours a day = 62,5$ per hour,
Go back to the Gantt Chart, split the window (click "detail" in the view tab of the ribbon),
Select your task and assign the newly created resource with a given % units.
Hope this helps.
Guillaume Rouyre - MBA, MCP, MCTS

Use an additional cost in the cost calculation

How to make to use one or more additional costs during the calculation of the cost of a finished product
Could you help me, please.
Thank you.
Jean-Marc

You can use additive costs to add costs to a product other than the cost estimate.CK74n

I have a 2GB data plan with my iphone 5c. If I purchase a new tablet can I use the phone as a personal hotspot for the tablet without any additional costs?

I have a 2GB data plan with my iphone 5c. If I purchase a new tablet can I use the phone as a personal hotspot for the tablet without any additional costs

dianneb, great question and thanks for the help Weth. The good news is if you're on More Everything the mobile hotspot would be apart of your plan just as Weth mentioned. What you just want to keep in mind is that the usage from the tablet while connected to the hotspot would take from your current plan allowance. Hope this helps!
AdamG_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Cinemax is now included with your package at no additional cost!

Did anyone else get this email - will I save money or will this cost me more money? I assume save? Anyone have more details?
Dear Customer:
Good news for customers currently subscribed to the Ultimate FiOS® TV package. Cinemax is now included with your package at no additional cost!
We will change your current HBO/Cinemax subscription to HBO only. Your account will be credited for the price difference between HBO/Cinemax and HBO from the effective date of the Ultimate Package change. Please note you may not see these reflected on your bill for several months.
Additionally, if you are currently receiving an HBO/Cinemax promotion, you will continue to enjoy it against your HBO package for the duration of your promotional period.
No action is needed on your part. We will take care of these changes for you!
Thank you for choosing Verizon.
Sincerely,
Verizon

I believe it means if you were getting a promotional rate of 1/2 off an HBO/Cinemax package it would continue although you were only getting charged for HBO. Of course my experience was not as described above. When I noticed the change on my bill today I called FIOS and learned that Cinemax was now included in my highest tier TV package. I would only be charged for HBO - HOWEVER the CSR could not apply a 1/2 discount to HBO. So now I pay more for HBO alone then I did for HBO/Cinemax together - $16.99 vs $12.50 (with the credit). I just canceled HBO today.

MIRO - additional costs - 2 acc. docs with different dates

Dear SAP Experts!
I have the following issue.
Case description:
On March 19 2008 my Customer entered additional costs in MIRO for material A. The document Invoice date and Posting date (as well as BaselineDt) on the header were entered as 29.02.2008
The way the additional costs were entered without purchase order reference, directly to Material Account using Material Tab.
The additional cost was entered for the ammount of material that was at that (29.02) moment on stock. (however there were some movements - sales and returns between 29.02 and 19.03)
The issue is - 2 accounting documents were created:
- one conatining postings to Vendor, Tax and Material accounts - with Invoice date and Posting date as entered in MIRO - both 29.02.2008
- second containing postin to Stock Account - Cr & Price Difference account - Db. however the dates that appear are Document date - 29.02.2008, Posting date 01.03.2008
So the first document goes to Period 2 and the second to Period 3.
Cutomer asks me for explanation.
The questions are:
1. Is this the way standard system works?
2. Why 2 accounting documents were created?
3. Why they were created with different Posting dates?
4. Why there were any postings done on Price Differences account if the additional costs were posted to the ammount that was on stock at the time?
5. Even if there is a logic that the date is different - why it was 01.03.2008 at this case not 10 or 19.03.2008 for example?
6. How does the system calculates the ammount that is posted to the Stock Difference accoun?
Thank you very much in advance for your advice!

Hi
1) PO quantity 100 unit. GR 40 unit and IR time also 40 unit.
This will post automatically during miro as GR/IR account value same for both GR and IR. The subsequent 60 unit in PO will be received in the next GR. is this process correct?
PO 100
GR 40
IR 40
Correct
2) PO quantity 40 unit. GR 100 and IR 100.
This will poat automatically during miro as GR/IR account value same for both GR and IR. User has to add additional line in PO for 60 units. is this process correct?
PO 40
GR 100
IR 100
You can the same line item of PO And invoice will get blocked.
3) PO quantity 100 unit, GR 100 and IR 50 unit.
Somehow in vendor invoice hardcopy stated 50 units. Due to different in invoice quantity, the invoice amount also different.
In miro, we cannot change the quantity value in line item. Amount at header less then total line item value.
GR/IR can be setoff completely as I do not change line item quantity. Correct?
May I know what should I do on the difference?
PO 100
GR 100
IR 50
You can post the invoice for 50 units. System will accept it.
4) PO quantity 100 unit, GR 100 and IR 150 unit.
Somehow in vendor invoice hardcopy stated 150 units. Due to different in invoice quantity, the invoice amount also different.
In miro, we cannot change the quantity value in line item. Amount at header more than the total line item value.
GR/IR can be setoff completely as I do not change line item quantity. Correct?
May I know what should I do on the difference?
PO 100
GR 100
IR 150
Invoice get blocked
Thanks
Raman

Uploading of cost center data with additional fields

Hi Gurus,
I have uploaded the cost center data. now my client has given same data with additional fields data(ORT01, ORT02, TXJCD). first time I have uploaded with LSMW IDOC methos COSMAS1. but in the same idoc the extra field not available. So i have tried recording method for KS02 to upload the data. but the data is not changed. in the sence the additional fields data not loading. while uploading i getting the probelm at TXJCD. it is getting a popup window. i was not able to handle that. Is there any other Basic IDOC to upload the data with all the fields in cost center. BAPI or Direct input program? Thanks in advance

hi,
you can avoid the popup screen by using OK code.
~linganna.

Issue with calculation of planned cost.

Hi,
Can anybody explain me the s_alr_87013127 report. I am going to implement the PP orders process in plant.
After creating and releasing the order the planned price in the report is displayed as per below
In the above screen shot SMH cost is getting update in plan cost debit and material cost maintained as per in material master is getting update in plan cost credit. Please explain me why it is happening so that further analysis can be done.
The material type is HALB and it is not going to be sale to customer. The settlement category against the order is also maintained as MAT as per below screen shot.
Hence, the order is not settled through KO08 instead of that it is direct issue from stock through MVT Type 901 and against that cost is booked to its respective cost center as per below screen shot.
Please explain me why only plan credit cost is captured instead of considering the both plan credit & debit cost.
Regards,
Samrat

Hi Owen,
Thanks for reply. My problem is that i am producing a semifinished material but not selling it and even it have no BOM & routing. Producing and capturing all its material cost and SMH cost in plan cost, then issuing it from Sloc. & settling its cost to cost center through 901 mvt. type.
Hence, when i am going to settle it then only the material cost is getting settle in the cost center. Also, please explain me that is it a standard scenario where always plan cost credit will considered material cost & SMH cost will considered as plan cost debit.
As per my study the calculation of plan cost credit & plan cost debit is as per below.
Plan Cost Credit = Actual qty. X Standard price
Plan Cost Debit = Plan qty. X SMH hour booked in routing X Activity rate
Please explain
Regards,
Samrat

Adding additional costs to Material with price control "V"

Good Morning Gurus
We want to add some additional cost to materials. How to do this ?
These materials are valuated at MAP.
Actually there are some delivery costs which were not inventorised correctly to the materials. The materials are undervaluated, we want to add this additional cost to the materials. We donot want to hit the price control account.
Is there any other way ??
Thanks
Regards

Hi,
You can alter the Costing variant and valuation variant according to your scenario. Check the costing variant in OKKN and valuation variant OKK4. You will find the indicator for additive cost there.
Regards,
Jigar

Freight Calculation in Standard cost Run

Hi,
The requirement is while doing the standard cost calculation through CK11N / CK40N system should show seperately how much is freight plan cost &; how much is duty plan cost.e.g.
100 is material price as per condition PB00 Cost element 355100
10 is freight cost (ZFR1 10%) Cost element 363170
5 is duty cost (Zduty lets say 0.5%) Cost element 363171
So taotal cost will be 115
I wanted to get this in cost component wise. Client does not want manual intervention so do not want to go for additive cost method
I had tried through Purchasing info record. I have maintained the valuation variant accordingly. Assigned correct sub strategy to it & also maintained delivery cost button in the same screen to assign conditions to origin group.
Also I had maintained purchasing info record through me11 ; mainteined conditions there.
These above mentioned cost elements are mapped in cost component structure in T code OKTZ. Seperately for material ,freight &; duty
Now when I make a PO, system is showing correct calculation as per the conditions.When I do the GR the Freight &; duty is getting posted &; these GLs are having above mentioned primary cost elements . .So the primary cost element is also getting posted correctly.
Now the problem is
While doing the cost run system shows me Seperate cost for material as 100 , seperate for freight 10 & seperate for duty 5, but to the same cost element i.e. 355100. So all the cost is shown as material cost ; nothing is displayed as freight or duty
If I see the cost element report the corresponding value is flown to the corresponding cost element. But it is not reflecting in proper cost component in cost run
.Please guide me why this is happening. How can I resolve this
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi Ajay,
I was waiting for your reply.
As mentioned by you, I have mapped my cost component structure like Raw material, Freigh, Duty & assigned the corresponding cost elements to it.. But still in itemisation view it shows three values
consumption cost element 355100 - 100
consumption cost element 355100 - 10 (which should go to freight component where I have assigned the Freight cost element)
consumption cost element 355100 -5 (which should go to Duty component where I have assigned the Duty cost element)
FI entries are getting posted correctly. Values are flown to coresponding cost elements.
For the time being We will keep duty part side. We are discussing with client on this.
But, what could be the reason of this problem. How I can achieve the below mentioned result.
Cost component view
Raw material -100
Freight - 10
Duty - 5

Import Duty 10% & Additive Cost

Hi Guru,
Is there possibilty to create % in additive cost. Eg Import need to be incorporate into the costing run of the raw material.
If can, please advice how to do it and cannot advice how to bring this cost into the coting run.
Hope to hear from you soon.
Thanks.
Regards,
Kulasingam Balasingam

Hi
A material cost estimate in which you can enter costs manually in the form of a unit cost estimate, so that the manual costs can be added to an automatic cost estimate with quantity structure.
To ensure that the additive costs are included, set the indicator Incl. additive costs for each valuation strategy in the valuation variant in Customizing for Product Cost Planning.
Specify the following through the costing variant in Customizing for Product Cost Planning:
o Whether any existing additive costs are to be included in cost estimates that you create with this costing variant
o Whether the additive costs are to be included when calculating overhead
o Whether the additive costs are to be included when transferring stock to another plant.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di471/helpdata/EN/7e/cb81fa43a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Regards

Calculation with additional costs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for