Onhand materials with additional cost query

Hello!
I'm stuck with a query and i need help.
The query needs to show the current onhand quantity of the material with costs , expire dates , lot numbers , warehouse codes , expire dates , arrival dates.
The actual query is :
SELECT
OOD.ORGANIZATION_NAME "ORG_NAME",
MOQD.SUBINVENTORY_CODE "WHS_CODE",
MSI.SEGMENT1 "Item Code",
MSI.DESCRIPTION "Item Name",
MSI.PRIMARY_UOM_CODE "ME",
SUM(MOQD.TRANSACTION_QUANTITY) "On Hand",
MTLN.LOT_NUMBER "LOT",
mln.expiration_date "Exp. date",
mln.attribute1 "PO number",
MAX(mmt.transaction_date) "Arrival date",
SUM( MMT.ACTUAL_COST) "Item cost"
--,SUM ( occe.cost_base_amount) "Etc. cost",
--oct.trx_quantity "Quantity"
FROM
MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSI
--, oaes_cogs_cost_elements occe
--, oaes_cogs_transactions oct
,ORG_ORGANIZATION_DEFINITIONS OOD
, MTL_ONHAND_QUANTITIES_DETAIL MOQD
,mtl_material_transactions MMT
,mtl_transaction_lot_numbers mtln
,mtl_LOT_NUMBERS MLN
WHERE
MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID=OOD.ORGANIZATION_ID
--and oct.cost_key = mln.attribute1
--and occe.element_type = 'INVOICE'
--and occe.cost_key = oct.cost_key
--and mmt.transaction_id = oct.trx_id 
--and oct.trx_type = 'RECEIPT'
and mtln.inventory_item_id = mln.inventory_item_id
and mtln.lot_number = mln.lot_number
and mtln.organization_id = mln.organization_id
AND MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID=MOQD.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
AND MMT.TRANSACTION_ID = MTLN.TRANSACTION_ID
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID=MOQD.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID=MMT.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID=MMT.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
AND MOQD.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MMT.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
AND MOQD.ORGANIZATION_ID = MMT.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND  MOQD.create_transaction_id=MMT.transaction_id
AND OOD.ORGANIZATION_ID = MMT.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND OOD.ORGANIZATION_ID = MOQD.ORGANIZATION_ID
GROUP BY      
MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID,
OOD.ORGANIZATION_NAME,
MOQD.SUBINVENTORY_CODE,
MSI.SEGMENT1,
MSI.DESCRIPTION,
MSI.PRIMARY_UOM_CODE,
MTLN.LOT_NUMBER,   
mln.expiration_date,
mln.attribute1
--,oct.trx_quantity
ORDER BY 1, 3, 4
If i connect oct and octe it will only show a few lines not all
Thank you for your help in advanced ,
Zsolt

I tried. And here is the result :
It seems that there is no record in table mtl_cst_actual_cost_details with the same transaction_id as in mtl_material_transactions table, but i found something strange.
I found a data where the actual cost transaction id is equal to material transaction transfer transaction id. the date is equal also the item id BUT with the same wrong price
I got this query from an oracle report the following queries which actually shows the correct price but only for thoose items which has got some extra cost on it :
select teny_s6 ,
  bev_egys t1,
  bev_egys + sum(teny_ktg)/menny t_onk,
  bev_egys * menny tm1,
  bev_egys * menny + sum(teny_ktg) tm_onk
from
select e.cost_key        teny_s6,
  substr(g.segment2,6,1) ktg_tip,
  t.trx_quantity         menny,
  t.bev_egys             bev_egys,
  sum(e.cost_base_amount) teny_ktg
from
  oaes_cogs_cost_elements   e,
  gl_code_combinations      g,
  (select distinct tc.cost_key, tc.trx_quantity, mmt.actual_cost bev_egys
   from oaes_cogs_transactions tc,
        mtl_material_transactions mmt
   where
     tc.trx_id = mmt.transaction_id
     and tc.trx_type = 'RECEIPT') t
where e.cost_ccid = g.code_combination_id
  and e.element_type = 'INVOICE'
  and t.cost_key = e.cost_key
  and substr(g.segment2, 1, 5) = '26211'
group by e.cost_key, substr(g.segment2,6,1), t.trx_quantity, t.bev_egys
group by teny_s6, bev_egys, menny
This query shows the right costs but only shows the netto price :
select
  nvl(t.cost_key, ln.attribute1)      s6,
  To_Char(nvl(MAX(t.trx_date), MAX(mmt.transaction_date)), 'DD-MON-YYYY') bev_datum,
  nvl(MAX(t.trx_quantity), SUM(mmt.primary_quantity)) menny,
  mmt.transaction_uom   me,
  mmt.currency_code     devn,
  mmt.currency_conversion_rate arfolyam,
  mmt.actual_cost       bev_egys,
  mmt.actual_cost /  decode(nvl(mmt.currency_conversion_rate, 0), 0, 1,
      mmt.currency_conversion_rate) elk_dev_egys,
  mmt.actual_cost * nvl(MAX(t.trx_quantity), SUM(mmt.primary_quantity)) bem
from
  mtl_material_transactions mmt,
  mtl_transaction_lot_numbers tln,
  mtl_lot_numbers ln,
  oaes_cogs_transactions t
where mmt.transaction_id = tln.transaction_id
  and mmt.organization_id = tln.organization_id
  and tln.organization_id = ln.organization_id
  and mmt.inventory_item_id = tln.inventory_item_id
  and tln.inventory_item_id = ln.inventory_item_id
  and tln.lot_number = ln.lot_number
  and mmt.transaction_type_id in (18, 41)
  and nvl(ln.attribute1, '?') = t.cost_key
  and t.trx_id(+) = mmt.transaction_id
-- AND t.cost_key(+) = :P_KALK_EGYSEG
  AND t.trx_type(+) = 'RECEIPT'
  AND t.inventory_item_id = mmt.inventory_item_id
-- and ln.attribute1 = '9529_120-0011-1_9398'
and ln.attribute1 = '9581_120-0164-3_9446'
GROUP BY t.cost_key, mmt.actual_cost, -- mmt.transaction_date, t.trx_date,  
  ln.attribute1, mmt.transaction_uom, mmt.currency_code,
  mmt.currency_conversion_rate, mmt.actual_cost

Similar Messages

  • Non-configurable materials with EK02 costing

    Hi all,
    We have a range of non configurable manufactured materials which, when used in standard sales orders, generate a production order and BOM. Presently the cost is automatically generated from the material master and is populated as a VPRS cost.
    As these materials have a BOM we want the cost to pick up from the BOM instead, ie as an EK02 cost. If we enter such a material and do a manual recost the EK02 populates in the sales order item conditions but we cannot get it to populate automatically as it does with configurable materials with BOMs.
    In the define item categories section in SPRO we have removed the determine cost tick. This has the desired effect of removing the VPRS cost but the EK02 cost still doesn't pull through. In the Bill of Material / Configuration section of the item category we tried setting the structure scope to A (Explode single-level bill of material) and B (Explode multi-level bill of material) but this didn't work. If we set it to D (Configuration, poss. with BOM explosion), then we get the "item can be configured but there is no configuration" error when used in a sales order which is expected as these products have no configuration.
    We also tried deleting the standard cost held in the material master to see if, as that value was now blank, it would pick up the EK02 instead but, alas, this also ddn't work.
    Any help / suggestions would be most appreciated.
    Kind regards, Rob

    HI,
    We are maintaining the Service masters for the services we render, there is no valuation of Inventory as only service is being rendered.
    But we have maintained BOM and Routings for the services we render.
    Even there is no valuation class in the serivice masters as this is non valuated.
    Can you guide me more on this pls.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Product calculation in combination with additive cost and mixed costing

    Hello all,
    I want to calculate trading good. I have defined a mixed costing for this article. Additional I had entered additive costs for the same article. When I run the calculation, it works only with the definitions of the mixed costing. Does the calculation take either the mixed costing or the additive cost?
    Best regards
    Jürgen

    We also faced similar issue & had approched SAP for the same. As clarified by SAP,  additive cost with mixed costing is not supported.
    You may try using reference costing variant for this.
    Regards
    Rakesh Pawaskar

  • With remote_os_authent being deprecated, will replacement come with additional cost?

    One of our applications uses AD with remote_os_authent for single sign on (for some users) to the underlying database.
    The database is currently on 9iR2 but will soon be moved to 11gR2  - with remote_os_authent now deprecated, I am under the impression from the vendor that one has to now add Oracles Access Manager with it's extra cost now that remote_os_authent is being phased out.
    The vendor's app is tied in with Microsoft Active Directory to pass along credentials to implement single sign on, as a result of remote_os_authent being deprecated they tell me many of their customers are balking at purchasing an additional license(s) so they have now ported the application to use MSSQL database for a back end, as MSSQL provides integration with AD at no extra cost.  This is an option I have been asked to look into as well, if there is going to be an extra cost to what we've already been using at no cost.
    I've not had a lot of experience with remote_os_authent, and am confused if integrating database logins with AD specifically requires the remote_os_authent parameter or one can create a user identified externally and have AD pass the domain credentials without the remote_os_authent parameter. We have EE licensing and if I have to purchase an additional product at an additional cost now then I'll likely look at having them port the app to use MSSQL as well.
    Anyone else running into this?
    thanks in advance

    Anything regarding licensing, please check with your friendly sales rep.
    You may need to skip 11g and go straight to 12c.
    Oracle Database Editions
    "Enterprise User Security is an EE feature for directory-based management of database users. It does require a corresponding Oracle Identity Management Directory Services Plus to be licensed.
    Usage of Enterprise User Security with Oracle Database strong authentication (PKI, Kerberos) no longer requires Oracle Advanced Security to be licensed"
    As far as I know:  kerberos === Windows 2008+ AD
    Again - anything regarding licensing, please check with your friendly sales rep.

  • Calculation with additional costs

    Hi all,
    we have a calculation based on info records. The calculation is done based on condition PB00 for the main vendor.
    The Problem is: for some products we have additional costs from other intermediate vendors.
    For example:
    Main vendor has a condition PB00 for 10€ / KG
    for that main vendor we have some Partners defined in Transaction MK03 (Partner SP for Transport as example)
    While calculating the Price, the System should get the PB00 Price for the main vendor and also the other Z... conditions for the SP Partner.
    This should be done depending on Material or purchaseing Organisation.
    Any Suggestion ?
    Thanks in advance for any help..
    Kind regards
    Fred

    Hi Mukthar,
    I Need the condition PB00 from the main vendor + the conditions from the SP vendor in the calculation. Not only the condition from one or the from the other one.
    If I Change the vendor at GR, I will only have the condition from the new vendor.
    regards
    Fred

  • Additive cost not seen in production order and while settling hits PRD

    I am using additive costs for my product costing via CK74n.
    Cost estimate looks good since I have the valuation variants setup to include additive costs.
    But when I see the production order that is being created, all others costs are being considered except additive costs. They are recognized but not as a line item instead as a variance. When I settle the order the costs actually hit price difference account and not even the GL account that I had assigned for the additive cost. SAP did not consider the cost as variance even if it was showing up as variance initially. This as I understood is partly because of the settlement rule that I have in place which tells SAP to go and settle on the material (which is standard SAP to do since I want all the costs from the production order to settle on the eventual material going into stock) so SAP went on to settling on the material. Since the material is set as standard price the variance is being booked as a price difference entry.
    Ideally I would have expected the additive cost getting debited to the order and credited to the gl account that I assigned for the additive cost. The eventual cost (incl. additive cost) should hit the inventory.
    Am I missing a step?

    Hi Sapluver,
    Appreciate your prompt response..Please see my response in italics
    Few queries related to your post.
    1. So your standard cost got two part, one with quantity structure ( materials, labor, OSC etc) which the system cost automatically and one manual part, which is your additive cost. While costing system picks up this manual part from CK74N.
    I hope this part you got correct. Yes, the cost estimate is reading from both the qty structure and the additive costs and the cost roll-up is coming up correctly
    2. Now in actual cost controlling, i think System is not sure how to valuate your additive cost actual part.I agree, the additive cost does appear in the cost analysis section of the production order but does not show up as a line item initially. Instead it comes up as a difference item right in the bottom of the screen after totals have been displayed without any line item reference. As if the system is not sure how to display the line item. Once I have done the material issuance confirmation to the order, the additive cost got picked up correctly as I have set it up in the cost component structure as material overhead but again shows up only as variance
    Which method you used to debit your production order with additive cost, is it a normal journal entry or through some automatic posting through routing ( example OSC through Purchase order/Good Receipt).I probably need to understand your point more clearly? I am not manually debiting the production order at all for the additive cost. I was expecting SAP to debit the order the same way it does for overheads. Overheads too initially show up as variance but then when we run the overhead calculation KGI2 the overheads costs get debited to the production order. Was expecting similar behavior for additive costs. I am receiving the finished product from the production order into stock via MIGO goods receipt movement type 101. I was expecting the debit to happen perhaps at the time of settlement via CO88 but here the system posted it to the price difference account via account key PRD. This I understand the system did because the settlement rule is set to post all the costs on the material and the material has the valuation control as standard price; so the system is seeing the additive cost as a price difference hence posting it to the price difference account.
    System is unaware of the additive cost from actual cost point of view, there is no specification to additive cost from costing variant for actual cost. So you have to debit the order with the additive cost part.So do I manually debit the order with the additive cost? What about the price difference additive cost sitting on the order? Would appreciate if you can tell me the process steps for posting this correctly
    regards
    Sapluver

  • KE380 for finished good with released cost estimate

    Dear Gurus,
    We have following error.
    No product costing estimate could be found
    Message no. KE380
    Diagnosis
    In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to find a product cost estimate for product 20010412 in plant FA03 that uses costing variant LG01.
    The system looked for the cost estimate using costing key LG1 as defined in the CO-PA Customizing
    settings.
    System Response
    No estimate could be found.
    Procedure
    Check the settings for valuation using product costing. If necessary, create a product cost estimate for this product.
    The thing is this error occurs for materials with released cost estimate.
    Before we had error ke350 for all materials considering DIEN and ROH.
    After supressing the error in kepc we can release invoices with DIEN and ROH materials.
    But we got another ke380.
    How can we solve this issue?
    With best regards,
    Kamila.

    Hi,
    This type of errror is usual if costing based COPA is active and you are using Costing key to valuate the inventory using the Standard cost estimation.
    When the costing key is been configured in COPA to access the standard cost estimation and is accordingly assigned to material types, then when the billing is released to accounting system tries to find out the SCE in the material master to pass the COGM to COPA. If it doesnt find the same, it will throw the error.
    Hence, run SCE and update your material master.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ravi Kumar

  • Please note that i am seeking some assistance with adding the followng resource: A maximum of 4 resources can be added at an additional cost of $500 per day per resource.

    Hi, Please note that i am seeking some assistance with adding the following resource to a task in Microsoft Project 2010:
    A maximum of 4 resources can be added at an additional cost of $500 per day per resource.

    Hi Clemence,
    Your post has quite little details, but as far as I understand, you want to add 4 resources on a task, each resource costing 500$ a day. Since it is not mentionned if it is generic resources (skill or role) or named resources, I'll assume that it is generic
    resources. Based on this understanding, here is a proposal:
    Go to the resource sheet,
    Create a work generic resource ("type" field set to "work", "generic" field to "yes"), typing in the resource name field the skill name,
    In the max unit field, enter 400% for 4 resources (for just 4 if  your Project 2010 is configured to display units in decimals),
    Since the rate is an hourly rate, make the calculation : 500$ per day / 8 hours a day = 62,5$ per hour,
    Go back to the Gantt Chart, split the window (click "detail" in the view tab of the ribbon),
    Select your task and assign the newly created resource with a given % units.
    Hope this helps.
    Guillaume Rouyre - MBA, MCP, MCTS

  • I have a 2GB data plan with my iphone 5c.  If I purchase a new tablet can I use the phone as a personal hotspot for the tablet without any additional costs?

    I have a 2GB data plan with my iphone 5c.  If I purchase a new tablet can I use the phone as a personal hotspot for the tablet without any additional costs

        dianneb, great question and thanks for the help Weth. The good news is if you're on More Everything the mobile hotspot would be apart of your plan just as Weth mentioned. What you just want to keep in mind is that the usage from the tablet while connected to the hotspot would take from your current plan allowance. Hope this helps!
    AdamG_VZW
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • Adding additional costs to Material with price control "V"

    Good Morning Gurus
    We want to add some additional cost to materials. How to do this ?
    These materials are valuated at MAP.
    Actually there are some delivery costs which were not inventorised correctly to the materials. The materials are undervaluated, we want to add this additional cost to the materials. We donot want to hit the price control account.
    Is there any other way ??
    Thanks
    Regards

    Hi,
    You can alter the Costing variant and valuation variant according to your scenario. Check the costing variant in OKKN and valuation variant OKK4. You will find the indicator for additive cost there.
    Regards,
    Jigar

  • Is it required to cost the materials with Price control "V" ?

    Dear All,
    Would like to know if we have to consider the items with Price control "V" during the cost run in CK40N..?
    Since the system automatically updates the price of the item for price control "V", do we also require to update through cost run?
    Please help me understand.
    Best regards,
    Praveen

    Hi,
    Materials with price control "V" is dynamically updated with value whenever there is a receipts.  The system will calculate average rate by dividing total value by total stock.  Hence, cost the materials for this price control is not relevant.  It is recommended to have price control "V" for all externally procured materials.
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Cinemax is now included with your package at no additional cost!

    Did anyone else get this email - will I save money or will this cost me more money? I assume save? Anyone have more details?
    Dear Customer:
    Good news for customers currently subscribed to the Ultimate FiOS® TV package. Cinemax is now included with your package at no additional cost!
    We will change your current HBO/Cinemax subscription to HBO only. Your account will be credited for the price difference between HBO/Cinemax and HBO from the effective date of the Ultimate Package change. Please note you may not see these reflected on your bill for several months.
    Additionally, if you are currently receiving an HBO/Cinemax promotion, you will continue to enjoy it against your HBO package for the duration of your promotional period.
    No action is needed on your part. We will take care of these changes for you!
    Thank you for choosing Verizon.
    Sincerely,
    Verizon

    I believe it means if you were getting a promotional rate of 1/2 off an HBO/Cinemax package it would continue although you were only getting charged for HBO.   Of course my experience was not as described above.   When I noticed the change on my bill today I called FIOS and learned that Cinemax was now included in my highest tier TV package.  I would only be charged for HBO  - HOWEVER the CSR could not apply a 1/2 discount to HBO.  So now I  pay more for HBO alone then I did for HBO/Cinemax together - $16.99 vs $12.50 (with the credit).   I just canceled HBO today. 

  • Costing run for materials with special procurement key

    Hello,
    Since moving to ECC6, the costing run for materials with special procurement keys is not pulling the marked price from the materials the special procurement keys point to. Only the released prices are pulled.
    Example:
    Material A, plant A has a future price (costing 2 tab) of 100 and a current price of 99
    Material A, plant B has special procurement key Z1 (costing 1 tab) which pulls the costing from Material A, plant A
    In our old system (46c) the costing run for Material A, plant B would pull 100.
    In ECC6, the costing run for Material A, plant B pulls 99
    Anyone that can push me in the right direction?

    Hi,
    Based on the info provided thus far, the result that you notice in ECC 6.0 is right as it is picking the current standard price based on your setup.
    Now why it is picking the future price in 4.6c, well for that you will have to do a detail check as in which variant is being used etc. I would suggest you to work with your CO personnel on this. Do a costing run for this particular material via CK11n using the variant which you mentioned & see the results.
    Or if you can upload the screenshots (picasaweb or some other portal) of the valuation variant you're using in 4.6c, along with Acctng view 1 & 2, costing view 1 & 2 details of the material it would help to have a better understanding.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • MIRO - additional costs - 2 acc. docs with different dates

    Dear SAP Experts!
    I have the following issue.
    Case description:
    On March 19 2008 my Customer entered additional costs in MIRO for material A. The document Invoice date and Posting date (as well as BaselineDt) on the header were entered as 29.02.2008
    The way the additional costs were entered without purchase order reference, directly to Material Account using Material Tab.
    The additional cost was entered for the ammount of material that was at that (29.02) moment on stock. (however there were some movements - sales and returns between 29.02 and 19.03)
    The issue is - 2 accounting documents were created:
    - one conatining postings to Vendor, Tax and Material accounts - with Invoice date and Posting date as entered in MIRO - both 29.02.2008
    - second containing postin to Stock Account - Cr & Price Difference account - Db. however the dates that appear are Document date - 29.02.2008, Posting date 01.03.2008
    So the first document goes to Period 2 and the second to Period 3.
    Cutomer asks me for explanation.
    The questions are:
    1. Is this the way standard system works?
    2. Why 2 accounting documents were created?
    3. Why they were created with different Posting dates?
    4. Why there were any postings done on Price Differences account if the additional costs were posted to the ammount that was on stock at the time?
    5. Even if there is a logic that the date is different - why it was 01.03.2008 at this case not 10 or 19.03.2008 for example?
    6. How does the system calculates the ammount that is posted to the Stock Difference accoun?
    Thank you very much in advance for your advice!

    Hi
    1) PO quantity 100 unit. GR 40 unit and IR time also 40 unit.
    This will post automatically during miro as GR/IR account value same for both GR and IR. The subsequent 60 unit in PO will be received in the next GR. is this process correct?
    PO 100
    GR 40
    IR 40
    Correct
    2) PO quantity 40 unit. GR 100 and IR 100.
    This will poat automatically during miro as GR/IR account value same for both GR and IR. User has to add additional line in PO for 60 units. is this process correct?
    PO 40
    GR 100
    IR 100
    You can the same line item of PO And invoice will get blocked.
    3) PO quantity 100 unit, GR 100 and IR 50 unit.
    Somehow in vendor invoice hardcopy stated 50 units. Due to different in invoice quantity, the invoice amount also different.
    In miro, we cannot change the quantity value in line item. Amount at header less then total line item value.
    GR/IR can be setoff completely as I do not change line item quantity. Correct?
    May I know what should I do on the difference?
    PO 100
    GR 100
    IR 50
    You can post the invoice for 50 units. System will accept it.
    4) PO quantity 100 unit, GR 100 and IR 150 unit.
    Somehow in vendor invoice hardcopy stated 150 units. Due to different in invoice quantity, the invoice amount also different.
    In miro, we cannot change the quantity value in line item. Amount at header more than the total line item value.
    GR/IR can be setoff completely as I do not change line item quantity. Correct?
    May I know what should I do on the difference?
    PO 100
    GR 100
    IR 150
    Invoice get blocked
    Thanks
    Raman

  • Uploading of cost center data with additional fields

    Hi Gurus,
    I have uploaded the cost center data. now my client has given same data with additional fields data(ORT01, ORT02, TXJCD). first time I have uploaded with LSMW IDOC methos COSMAS1. but in the same idoc the extra field not available. So i have tried recording method for KS02 to upload the data. but the data is not changed. in the sence the additional fields data not loading. while uploading i getting the probelm at TXJCD. it is getting a popup window. i was not able to handle that. Is there any other Basic IDOC to upload the data with all the fields in cost center. BAPI or Direct input program? Thanks in advance

    hi,
    you can  avoid the popup screen by using  OK code.
    ~linganna.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How Can I Change the Size of My Home Page So That It Fills the Screen?

    I have a PowerBook G4. Up until a couple of weeks ago when I opened Safari the home page filled the screen. Something has happened and now it fills only a portion of the screen. I can move the page around, change the size slightly by using the green

  • Turn off shuffle in itunes

    I can't figure our how to turn off the shuffle in my iPhone's iTunes! Help?

  • Oracle -- ConnectInit.

    Hi All,  For setting session items on a Oracle session, we are using ConnectInit method of BO system.  This method works perfectly with ODBC drivers but is posing some issues when used with Oracle driver.  BO has released a fix for this with Patch ID

  • Assigning of reward points

    Hi Moderator, Please can you give Adrian Hughes 10 points as you locked my thread before I was able to award him the points for the correct answer and it was all because of a message saying my post contained profanity or inappropiate language, which

  • Is it possible to rent a movie on the new iPad using only 4g?

    Why do they say u can use the 4g network to download movies when every time i try to it says it's too big and I have to be on a wifi...that's why I got the 4g cause my wifi *****...help please!