Can we hide filter in Search Master agreements standard top level query?

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to hide flter in standard Search Master Agreements top level query. See below screen shot
I have an idea how to delete filter in query but when i have added that query to top level navigation i don't have any idea.
So i want to hide Business Unit & Region filter in Search Master Agreement query when it is in top level navigation.
If anyone have idea please share with me how to hide.
Thanks,
Lava

Hi Lava,
It is not a filter but this a Standard field which is coming from the Master Agreement.
So, you cannot hide or even delete any field.
But if it is a custom field you can hide it by inactivating the respective field in Extension Defination.
Please let me know if you need any assistance.
Thanks,
Raj.

Similar Messages

Can we duplicate standard query Search Master Agreements and Agreements.

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to hide Agreement Manager and Business Unit & Region result fields in standard Search Master Agreements and Agreements query.
I have duplicated this standard query and deleted Agreement Manager and Business Unit & Region result fields. Try to run this query but it is giving error.
Execution Type is Java.
Query Executor Class: com.sap.eso.contracts.query.SearchAllMAandAgreements
Error: SQL Exception: Fail to convert to internal representation, ANSI-92 SQL State: 99999, Vendor Error Code: 17059. Fail to convert to internal
representation.
Does anyone have idea about this functionality or how this standard query can be modified.
Thanks,
Lava

Hi Lava,
There is the Standard Query ODP-ESO-MasterAgreementList
Duplicate the query and remove the fields from the Result fields whcih you dont want. I think you will get the result required.
Thanks
Kushagra A

How can I hide filter row in table?

Hi experts,
I've made a table with filter but as I need to use DropDownByIndex UI element for one of my filter cell editors I've added a fixed top cell to this column. And when the onChange action of this dropdown is called I just pass its value to the filter attribute and fire the filter action. But now I have to filter cells on this column - the fixed one and the default one that appears when i bind the filterValue property of the column. My question is how can I remove or hide this defsault cell and use (see) only the fixed top cell that I've added.
Your help will be appreciated and granted with points

Hi guys,
Thanks for your replies but I found other solution to my problem. I simply create filter for hidden columns and I'm using only the fixed top cells as filter. I do that by passing the cell values to the filter of the table and fire the filter action. This way I can use any type of UI for my filter (fixed top) cells.

Disabling the default search when searching for master Agreements

Hello Experts
I am relatively new to SAP e sourcing ,we are working on 5.1 system.
We have a query , Contract management->Agreements->Search master agreements and Sub agreements.
This query takes a lot of time for execution.
When user selects this option , it runs this query and then displays a screen with all the filters and search results at the bottom.
I want to ensure that this query is not run by default, so that when user selects this option , the page only displays the selection criteria , users can specify the filter values and hit on search.
Can anyone please help me on how can we disable the default execution of query everytime "Search master agreements and Sub agreements " is selected from the dropdown.
is there any option within the query itself or do we need any script for doing this.
Regards
Vikas

Hello Vikas,
This should be the general approach.
1) Write a new query that has the functionality you desire. In your case you can duplicate the existing query and make one of the filters mandatory. This will ensure that the query does not get executed by default. Save this new query in the system.
2) Identify the corresponding query group. In your case it is FCI-ContractBuyList.
3) In this query group, find the entry for 'Search Master Agreements and Agreements' query and check 'Remove Query from Selection List'.
4)Add your new query in this query group and check the 'Include in SRM Navigation' checkbox. Click Save.
Let us know if this works.
Thanks
Devesh

How to change the standard query "Create a Master Agreement" by a custom one

Hello Sourcing CLM experts,
I would need to replace the standard query displayed when the user tries to create a Master Agreement by a custom query to filter the MA types according to some criteria:
According to this post: Re: Create security profile for a document template in SAP Sourcing, I've tried to achieve it by doing the following steps:
Create a new query as a copy of exsiting query FCI-ContractTypes
Modify query group FCI-ContractTypesBP to include my custom query instead of the standard one to only list the MAType "Standard Master Agreement"
Following you can see the change done into the query group FCI-ContractTypesBP:
However, standard query has not been replaced and same set of MA Types are listed.
Therefore, I would like to ask you:
Is it possible to do this kind of modifications? If so, which query group need to be modified?
If it is not possible, is there any other way to achieve that requirement?
Thanks in advance for your time and support!
Best regards,
Isaac

Hello again experts,
If this query cannot be modified, is there any option to disable button below? Or at lease, to disable the query group to avoid the listing of MA Types when it is pressed?
The reason is because we are going to set up the system in the way that only it will be possible to create Master Agreements from Template. However, if user keep on using that button he will be able to create MA from document types.
Any ideas?
Thanks again and best regards,
Isaac

Copy line items from Master Agreement to SubAgreement

Dear all,
As a requirement, we need to create a dummy line item at master agreement and subagreement level to be able to publish them to ERP without need
to complete line items (they are completed in ERP via a development).
We have created master agreement templates with a dummy line item but at subagreement level, templates are not available.
What we are trying to develop is a script on post_create at agreement level to copy line items from Master Agreement to SubAgreement. We are able to get Master Agreement line items and copy them to the SubAgreement, but the subagreement is not created. This is the code we are using:
import com.sap.odp.api.doccommon.masterdata.ValueListValueIBeanHomeIfc;
import com.sap.odp.api.doccommon.masterdata.ValueListValueIBeanIfc;
import com.sap.odp.api.doccommon.masterdata.ValueListTypeIBeanHomeIfc;
import com.sap.odp.api.doccommon.masterdata.ValueListTypeIBeanIfc;
import com.sap.eso.api.contracts.ContractIBeanHomeIfc;
Mst_agreementBean = doc.getParentIBean();
lineItemCollectionSub = doc.getLineItems();
lineItemCollection = Mst_agreementBean.getLineItems();
collectionsize = lineItemCollection.size();
colln = Mst_agreementBean.getCollectionMetadata("MA_LINEITEMS").get(Mst_agreementBean);
colln2 = doc.getCollectionMetadata("MA_LINEITEMS").get(doc)
newProject = Mst_agreementBean.getIBeanHomeIfc().createFromAnother(Mst_agreementBean);
newMember = colln.get(1);
// Get Values Line Item
assCat = newMember.getAcctAssignCategory();
actLimP         = newMember.getActualLimitPercent();
delAdCity       = newMember.getDeliveryAddressCity();
delAdCount    = newMember.getDeliveryAddressCountryRef();
delAdDist       = newMember.getDeliveryAddressDistrict();
//... (all fields included in the script)
// Create Line
newMember2 = newMember;
AgreementHome = IBeanHomeLocator.lookup(session, doc.getObjectReference());
AgreementHome.upgradeToEdit(doc);
// Set Values
newMember2.setAcctAssignCategory(assCat);
newMember2.setActualLimitPercent(actLimP);
newMember2.setDeliveryAddressCity(delAdCity);
newMember2.setDeliveryAddressCountryRef(delAdCount);
newMember2.setDeliveryAddressDistrict(delAdDist);
//... (all fields included in the script)
try{
colln2.add(newMember2);
AgreementHome.save(doc);
AgreementHome.downgradeToView(doc);
collectionbean = colln2.get(0);
logInfo("Value of collectionbeanSub " + collectionbean );
}catch (ApplicationException e){
logInfo("Error " + e.getClass() + ". " + e.getMessage());
When we try to create an Agreement under a Master Agreement (clicking Add on Agreement tab), following error message is shown related to the line in blue:
Facility=local4;sessionid=4e73bb8e73304d6284816f93f4e04522a7c387b; tenantid=#tenant.ecb#;username=LUGUELL; exception=Sourced file: inline evaluation of: ``// **   import com.sap.odp.api.doccommon.masterdata.ValueListValueIBeanHomeI ... '' : Method Invocation AgreementHome.save : at Line: 164 : in file: inline evaluation of: ``// **    import com.sap.odp.api.doccommon.masterdata.ValueListValueIBeanHomeI ... '' : AgreementHome .save ( doc )
Target exception: java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method com.sap.eso.contracts.ContractTypeBo.getVendorVisible()
of a null object returned from com.sap.eso.contracts.ContractCommonBo.getTypeBo()
;stacktrace=Sourced file: inline evaluation of: ``// *JLA*    import com.sap.odp.api.doccommon.masterdata.ValueListValueIBeanHomeI ... '' : Method Invocation AgreementHome.save : at Line: 164 : in file: inline evaluation of: ``// *JLA*    import com.sap.odp.api.doccommon.masterdata.ValueListValueIBeanHomeI ... '' : AgreementHome .save ( doc )
Target exception: java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method com.sap.eso.contracts.ContractTypeBo.getVendorVisible()
of a null object returned from com.sap.eso.contracts.ContractCommonBo.getTypeBo()
Any ideas what is causing the error? What are we missing on our code to copy line items?
Many thanks,
Marc Romagosa
Message was edited by: Marc Romagosa de Riba

We managed to create a line item at VALIDATE script, but not at POST_CREATE. Either it is a bug or it is not possible at POST_CREATE script.

SharePoint 2010 Content from top level site hidden from search results on subsite.

Hi Everyone,
The issue I am having is that when a group of people are in there site, we'll call it site B, and they hit the search function, they only get results from site B and subsites of site B, but nothing from the top level site, site A. does anyone know of anyway
to get results from site A when searching in site B? This would really help me out a lot.
Thanks!
Best regards, Mike

Hi Mike,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to display the content in top level site in search results page when doing search in subsites.
By default, the search scope is set to This Site in all sites, so the search scope in subsites is limited to the subsites.
I recommend to create a Search Center and then edit the Search settings in the top level site settings, please refer to the image below:
Thanks,
Victoria
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

How to change Master Agreements search channel in Workbench

Hi All,
When we search in Master Agreements search channel in workbench then it displays a report just below that search, and when we click on that then it displays Master Agreement Search Agreement Detail.
In this details sub-agreement payment terms are not coming because Class id is different, but when I look into standard report : Master Agreement Search Agreement Detail, there query is having class id 1003.
Is it possible to replace this standard query in report or if we can replace this report in Master Agreements search channel in workbench.
Please advise.
Regards,
Prabhat Pandey

I see. I think SAP does not allow the standard FCI queries to be linked to Custom ones from the Setup --> Reports section.
In this case, you will first need to create a CUSTOM version of FCI-ConSearchMore and then link the custom version of FCI-ConSearchAgrDetail to this via the Setup--> Report section.
Then in the Setup--> Desktop Channel, you would need to go into the Master Agreement Search link and update the Parameter Definitions section with the new custom queries. This will ensure that in the Workbench page of the user, the desired results will be displayed.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Vikram Shukla

How Can I hide search help button in alv ?

Hi Sdn .
I want to hide search help button in my alv ..
My gs_fcat-f4availabl = 'X'. is not active .. but there is search help button .
How Can I hide button .
Regards .
Serkann

donnot pass any values in field catalog for reference field and reference table.
or dont use any standard data element

Can you filter iTunes search results by video or audio podcasts?

I have been searching for hours and haven't found a definite answer. Anyone know if this is possible?
Can you filter iTunes search results by video or audio podcasts?

I'm having the same problem. I go to Podcasts/Video Podcasts/News and they only give the featured, favorites (whose?), etc. I want to see all video news podcasts but if I then click on see all, it drops the video classification and shows all news podcasts. The iTunes search in general leaves a lot to be desired; its not very intuitive or pleasant to use, not the usual Apple experience.

Can anyone recommend a duplicate file finder application for OS10.6 systems? All the apps I find on the App Store are only for 10.7 and later. I don't know how to filter a search by operating system (if this is even possible).

Can anyone recommend a duplicate file finder application for OS10.6 systems? All the apps I find on the App Store are only for 10.7 and later. I don't know how to filter a search on the App Store by operating system (if this is even possible). I currently have a MacBook running OS10.6.8. If you can recommend an app, please post the URL. Would appreciate any helpful suggestions....
<Email Edited By Host>

Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left. If you don't see that menu, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar.
Click the Clear Display icon in the toolbar. Then try the action that you're having trouble with again. Select any messages that appear in the Console window. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
When posting a log extract, be selective. In most cases, a few dozen lines are more than enough.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

CLM Company-Organization Unit in Master Agreement

Hi guys
In a CLM Master Agreement, after I select a company, I am able to select any organizational unit, even if it does not belong to that company. The system does not issue any error message. Is it standard behavior?
Shouldnt the system validate that only the organizational units which are belonging to a particular company be displayed?
Thanks and regards
Ajay

Hi,
It looks it is standard behaviour.
We have put in script to validate and added a query to query group so that user can search ORG UNIT by company code.
//........................Gets company code
getChildFieldByFieldId(parentFieldId,childFieldId){
        value=doc.getExtensionField(parentFieldId).get();
     if(hasValue(value)){
          parenthome=IBeanHomeLocator.lookup(session,value);
          parentbean=parenthome.find(value);
          childField=parentbean.getExtensionField(childFieldId).get();
          return childField;
     return null;
validateCompanyCodes(parentfieldId,childFieldId){
        flag=false;
     maCompanyCode=doc.getExtensionField("SAPCCODE").get();
        companyCode=getChildFieldByFieldId(parentfieldId,childFieldId);
     if(companyCode==null @or !hasValue(maCompanyCode)){
          flag=false;
     }else if(maCompanyCode.equals(companyCode)){
          flag=true;
     return flag;
purchasingOrgCompanyCodeMatch=validateCompanyCodes("SAPPORG","sapccode");

Attachments Toolbar for Master Agreements

On the sell side, when suppliers log on, we are trying to hide the Attachments toobar (button) when they are in Master Agreements. In Toolbar Customization I can Hide the toolbar but it does it on both the buy and the sell sides and we want to keep it available for the buy side. Has anyone wver come accross this issue and has a solution ?

Jeff,
It does make sense to me what you are trying but it does not make sense in the logic of SAP Sourcing. You don't want the suppliers to see the button to not confuse them but in the logic if you activate it on one side the possibility you are sharing a document is real so it should be visible on both sides or you will have confusion on the buyer side if someone chooses internal and external view while the supplier doesn't see even the attachment section.
On the buyer side the default is internal only so if this is not changed by the master agreement owner on the buyer side the attachment section will always be empty for the supplier causing no unnecessary confusion.
There is no way at present to hide this only on the supplier side as far as I see it.
Regards,
Erik

Importing Attachments for Master Agreements in CLM

I am attempting to load contract files (.doc/PDF) using the import tool and I am having issues. What needs to be populated in the 'Attachment Order Code' field in the load file.
Can someone outline the steps to load an existing contract created outside of CLM to a master agreement?
I am using E-Sourcing 5.1/CLM 2.0.
Thanks in Advance,
Kyle

Jeff,
It does make sense to me what you are trying but it does not make sense in the logic of SAP Sourcing. You don't want the suppliers to see the button to not confuse them but in the logic if you activate it on one side the possibility you are sharing a document is real so it should be visible on both sides or you will have confusion on the buyer side if someone chooses internal and external view while the supplier doesn't see even the attachment section.
On the buyer side the default is internal only so if this is not changed by the master agreement owner on the buyer side the attachment section will always be empty for the supplier causing no unnecessary confusion.
There is no way at present to hide this only on the supplier side as far as I see it.
Regards,
Erik

How to make extended field mandatory in Master Agreement

Hello All,
I am new to SAP CLM, and I have requirement where one extended field in master agreement needs to be made as mandatory field.
I tried in extension definition but check box to make it required is disabled and I am unable to find other way to do it.
Can some one help me and Please let me know how make extended fields mandatory in CLM.
Regards,
Prabhat

Hi
This could be achieved using Page Customization.Go to Setup-> User Interface-> Page Customization, open master agreement object (create new with UI ID:contracts.contract.ui.buyside.default if doesn't exist ) and add a new customization for extended field with Property set to Required.
Regards
Mudit Saini

Can we hide filter in Search Master agreements standard top level query?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for