Cannot access WL6.1 SP3 server

Dear All,
For some reason I'm getting a NoSuchFieldError thrown everytime I attempt to access be Weblogic 6.1 SP3 server. This exception gets thrown once on an attempt to access the service via HTTP. A second request crashes the WL JVM.
I notice a CR has been released for this problem and fixed in SP6. Unfortunately, due to problems with licensing I'm stuck with SP3. Is there a work-around for this?
Kind regards
-- Ricardo <[email protected]>
####<09-Nov-04 11:12:19 GMT> <Info> <NT Performance Pack> <LON-OTP-DES-172> <testserver> <ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'default'> <> <> <000000> <Allocating: '2' NT reader threads>
####<09-Nov-04 11:12:19 GMT> <Error> <NT Performance Pack> <LON-OTP-DES-172> <testserver> <ExecuteThread: '12' for queue: 'default'> <> <> <000000> <failure in processSockets() - GetData: 'weblogic.socket.NTSocketMuxer$GetData - native pointer: '0', numBytes: '0''>
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: fd
at weblogic.socket.NTSocketMuxer.getNextSocket(Native Method)
at weblogic.socket.NTSocketMuxer.processSockets(NTSocketMuxer.java:589)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:24)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120

best guess would be to disable native IO.
- Anders M.

Similar Messages

Error: cannot access class oracle.jbo.server.ViewObjectImpl;

hi
while compiling my project
i m getting this error..
Error: cannot access class oracle.jbo.server.ViewObjectImpl; file oracle\jbo\server\ViewObjectImpl.class not found
please help.
regards
naveen

Are the fwk class libraries included in jdev project ?
Thanks
Tapash

TS2776 error message 'cannot access conflict information sync server'

I recently can't sync my iPhone with my Microsoft Outlook calendar. I receive an error message 'cannot access conflict information sync server. Try again later.' Help!

You are trying to use conflicting services for sync, disable all the ones that you do need. Once only one is enabled, you will be OK

Client Id in use - WL6.1 sp3   server to server JMS messaging

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. THANKS!
          -Alan May
          Scenario:
          Two weblogic 6.1 sp3 instances running on two separate Solaris 8 boxes.
          Server a - a message producer(client) for a number of topics and queues on b
          Server b - hosts JMS services including all the topics and queues, has both
          message producers and mdb consumers for a number of topics and queues
          What I've set up: a durable connection factory for topics for server a,
          topics for server b, queues for server a, and queues for server b (all
          targeted to server b)
          I have a singleton on each server that has methods to retrieve the queue
          connection or topic connection appropriate for that server(a single
          connection is
          shared for all topic producers and a separate connection is share for all
          queue producers for each server)
          I have each producer open and close a new session every time. However, the
          topic and queue connections are shared for all producers for that JVM. This
          seemed to be the approach recommended by the JMS spec, but do you feel this
          is the appropriate granularity given the above scenario? I am not currently
          closing my jms connection as part of a weblogic shutdown class. Is that
          essential in that case? If the server crashes - are there any
          recommendations on how to handle(if closing the connection is the issue)?
          I've confirmed that my JMS clients running with server b are not using the
          connection factories setup for a's use.
          Issue:
          Everything works on server b as expected.
          Server a's connections seemed to be fouled. I was getting that the clientid
          was in use(stack trace included below) while trying to fetch the connection.
          I stopped server a, removed the fouled connection factories on server
          b(dedicated for server a's use), and created new connection factories for
          a's use. I stopped server b and deleted everything from the two JMSState
          and JMSStore tables, restarted a then b, and tried the test again. This
          time the singleton code could fetch the connection without receiving a
          JMSException, but I was getting an exception when I tried to open a session
          from the connection.
          If worst comes to worse, I can stick a stateless session bean on b, to act
          as a delegate producer on behalf of server a, but I'd like to avoid it if
          possible.
          Any recommendations? Please let me know if it would be helpful for me to
          clarify any points.
          Server a's original error:
          weblogic.jms.common.InvalidClientIDException: Client id, Parser.topicPrime,
          is in use
          Start server side stack trace:
          weblogic.jms.common.InvalidClientIDException: Client id, Parser.topicPrime,
          is in use
          at
          weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnection.setClientId(FEConnection.java:918)
          at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnection.<init>(FEConnection.java:178)
          at
          weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory$1.run(FEConnectionFactory.java:319
          at weblogic.management.internal.Helper.doLocally(Helper.java:1656)
          at
          weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory.connectionCreate(FEConnectionFacto
          ry.java:316)
          at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown
          Source)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:305)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.cluster.ReplicaAwareServerRef.invoke(ReplicaAwareServerRef.java
          :93)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:274)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicExecuteRequest.execute(BasicExecuteRequest.java:2
          2)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
          End server side stack trace


Hi Alan,
          Lots of questions in one message! I'm going to
          try and answer them using the shotgun approach -- let
          me know if I miss.
          (1) It is good practice to close JMS resources when you are done
          with them, even if the destination host server crashes. The reason
          is that the connection resource may be hosted on a different
          WL server than the destination.
          (2) Creating a session/producer per message is heavy-weight
          in terms of CPU and network - if your app is performance
          sensitive is is better to cache these resources for re-use.
          See the JMS Performance Guide for details.
          (3) From your description I can't tell which two
          clients are conflicting. If what I'm writing here
          doesn't help, please try to narrow it down and repost.
          (4) Make sure that the connection factory does not have
          a "client-id" configured for it. Otherwise only one client
          can use the connection factory - instead have individual
          clients dynamically set their ids.
          (5) Note that client-ids are usually only useful for
          durable subscriber access, as other types of clients
          generally don't need exclusive connections, and therefore
          don't need client-ids.
          (6) The attached notes, which are for MDBs, may help you
          understand durable subscriptions and client-id's better in general.
          Tom
          Alan May wrote:
          > Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. THANKS!
          >
          > -Alan May
          >
          >
          > Scenario:
          >
          > Two weblogic 6.1 sp3 instances running on two separate Solaris 8 boxes.
          >
          > Server a - a message producer(client) for a number of topics and queues on b
          >
          > Server b - hosts JMS services including all the topics and queues, has both
          > message producers and mdb consumers for a number of topics and queues
          >
          > What I've set up: a durable connection factory for topics for server a,
          > topics for server b, queues for server a, and queues for server b (all
          > targeted to server b)
          >
          > I have a singleton on each server that has methods to retrieve the queue
          > connection or topic connection appropriate for that server(a single
          > connection is
          > shared for all topic producers and a separate connection is share for all
          > queue producers for each server)
          >
          > I have each producer open and close a new session every time. However, the
          > topic and queue connections are shared for all producers for that JVM. This
          > seemed to be the approach recommended by the JMS spec, but do you feel this
          > is the appropriate granularity given the above scenario? I am not currently
          > closing my jms connection as part of a weblogic shutdown class. Is that
          > essential in that case? If the server crashes - are there any
          > recommendations on how to handle(if closing the connection is the issue)?
          >
          > I've confirmed that my JMS clients running with server b are not using the
          > connection factories setup for a's use.
          >
          > Issue:
          > ------
          > Everything works on server b as expected.
          >
          > Server a's connections seemed to be fouled. I was getting that the clientid
          > was in use(stack trace included below) while trying to fetch the connection.
          >
          > I stopped server a, removed the fouled connection factories on server
          > b(dedicated for server a's use), and created new connection factories for
          > a's use. I stopped server b and deleted everything from the two JMSState
          > and JMSStore tables, restarted a then b, and tried the test again. This
          > time the singleton code could fetch the connection without receiving a
          > JMSException, but I was getting an exception when I tried to open a session
          > from the connection.
          >
          > If worst comes to worse, I can stick a stateless session bean on b, to act
          > as a delegate producer on behalf of server a, but I'd like to avoid it if
          > possible.
          >
          > Any recommendations? Please let me know if it would be helpful for me to
          > clarify any points.
          >
          >
          >
          > Server a's original error:
          > weblogic.jms.common.InvalidClientIDException: Client id, Parser.topicPrime,
          > is in use
          >
          > Start server side stack trace:
          > weblogic.jms.common.InvalidClientIDException: Client id, Parser.topicPrime,
          > is in use
          > at
          > weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnection.setClientId(FEConnection.java:918)
          > at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnection.<init>(FEConnection.java:178)
          > at
          > weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory$1.run(FEConnectionFactory.java:319
          > )
          > at weblogic.management.internal.Helper.doLocally(Helper.java:1656)
          > at
          > weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory.connectionCreate(FEConnectionFacto
          > ry.java:316)
          > at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown
          > Source)
          > at
          > weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:305)
          > at
          > weblogic.rmi.cluster.ReplicaAwareServerRef.invoke(ReplicaAwareServerRef.java
          > :93)
          > at
          > weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:274)
          > at
          > weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicExecuteRequest.execute(BasicExecuteRequest.java:2
          > 2)
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
          > End server side stack trace
          >
          >
          A durable topic subscriber MDB uses its name to generate its client-id.
          Since JMS enforces uniqueness on this client-id, this means that if a durable
          subscriber MDB is deployed to multiple servers only one server will be able
          to connect. Some applications want a different behavior where
          each MDB pool on each server gets its own durable subscription.
          The MDB durable subscription id, which must be unique on its topic, comes from:
          1) <jms-client-id>MyClientID</jms-client-id>
          (the weblogic dtd)
          2) if (1) is not set then the client-id
          comes from the ejb name.
          The durable subscription is uniquely identified within a cluster by a
          combination of "connection-id" and "subscription-id". Only one active
          connection may use a particular "connection-id" within a WebLogic cluster.
          The connection id comes from:
          1) The "ClientId" attribute configured on the WebLogic connection factory.
          This defaults to null. Note that if the ClientId is set on a connection
          factory, only one connection created by the factory
          may be active at a time.
          2) If (1) is not set, then, as with the subscriber-id,
          the connection-id is derived from jms-client-id descriptor attribute:
          <jms-client-id>MyClientID</jms-client-id>
          (the weblogic dtd)
          3) If (1) and (2) are not set, then, as with the subscriber-id,
          the connection-id is derived from the ejb name.
          Work-around:
          A) Create a custom connection-factory for each server:
          1) configure "JNDIName" to the same value across all servers
          ("myMDBCF" in this example)
          2) configure "ClientId" to a unique value per server
          3) enable "UserTransactionsEnabled"
          4) enable "XAConnectionFactoryEnabled"
          5) set "AcknowledgePolicy" to "ACKNOWLEDGE_PREVIOUS"
          6) target the CF at a single WebLogic server
          (Number 5 is required for non-transactional topic MDBs)
          B) In the MDB's weblogic-ejb-jar.xml descriptor, set the MDB's connection
          factory to the JNDI name of the custom connection factories configured in
          (A). Optionally, also specify the subscriber-id via the jms-client-id
          attribute.
          <weblogic-ejb-jar>
          <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
          <ejb-name>exampleBean</ejb-name>
          <message-driven-descriptor>
          <connection-factory-jndi-name>myMDBCF</connection-factory-jndi-name>
          <jms-client-id>myClientID</jms-client-id>
          </message-driven-descriptor>
          </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
          </weblogic-ejb-jar>
          C) Target the application at the same servers that have the custom connection
          factories targeted at them.
          Notes/Limitations:
          1) If the MDB is moved from one server to another, the MDB's corresponding
          connection-factory must be moved with it.
          2) This work-around will not work if the destination is not in the same
          cluster as the MDB. (The MDB can not use the local connection factory, which
          contains the connection-id, as connection factories do not work unless they
          are in the same cluster as the destination.)
          3) This work-around will not work for non-WebLogic JMS topics.

Error 80003 cannot access bb ID update server

Hi,
Installed the latest version of bb application world yesterday, since then I can't go into app world, says I need to update my blackberry identity before I can enter the app world. When I click yes to update my bb ID it gives me an error "download failed, cannot retrieve the blackberry identity update server, please try again later, error 80003"
I tried to re-install app world, nothing seem to work, my bb ID worked fine on the previous version.
I have a bb curve 8520. Can anyone please help / tell me how to fix this?
Thanks
Lee
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Guys,
Oops! by the look of things we all have the same problem, it seems as if BB is frustrating a lot lately. I updated my app world this morning and when i rebooted, and can't access my app world. Its giving me the same error code 80003).

I cannot access the embedded web server on my 7400, unable to connect to the url

I am unable to connect to the embedded web server on my 7400. I enter the IP from the network printout but the browser cannot find the printer

Download and run this utility: http://h20180.www2.hp.com/apps/Nav?h_pagetype=s-926&h_lang=en&h_client=s-h-e17-1&h_keyword=dg-NDU&ju...
What does it say?
Say thanks by clicking "Kudos" "thumbs up" in the post that helped you.
I am employed by HP

Solving the problem with error 80003 cannot access bb ID update server

Must be done over wi-fi only, switch off the cellphone network, works without a problem for me, hope it will work for everybody

Hi Guys,
Oops! by the look of things we all have the same problem, it seems as if BB is frustrating a lot lately. I updated my app world this morning and when i rebooted, and can't access my app world. Its giving me the same error code 80003).

Iphone4 syncing conflicts with outlook: cannot access conflicts

Error message: iTunes cannot access conflicts from sync server.
How do I correct this? Your help is greatly appreciated!

Tried it. Doesn't work on my iPhone 5 upgrade

Windows 7 pro client cannot access folders on server 2003 domain server

I added a windows 7 64 bit client to a server 2003 32 bit domain 3 weeks ago and file sharing was working fine until today, 5/4/12. Now, when trying to access shared folders that reside on the server,
I get the following "access denied" message:
[…folder…] is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions.
The user name could not be found.
Strangely enough...
The windows 7 client
can open shared folders that reside on the XP clients in the domain
All the XP clients in the domain can access the server 2003 folders
All the XP clients and the server 2003 machine can access shared folders and printers on the windows 7 client.
The windows 7 client can ping the server 2003 machine and vice versa
I can “see” the server in my network list, but when I click on it, I get the same “access denied” message listed above.
So... the only problem is that the windows 7 client cannot access folders that reside on the windows server 2003 machine. There must be some sharing setting that got changed
by a recent windows update.
Here is what I have done/verified so far on the windows 7 client:
In advanced sharing settings for Home/Work, Public and Domain profiles:
network discovery is enabled
file and print sharing is enabled
use user accounts and passwords to connect to other computers is selected (I also tried allowing windows to manage homegroup connections instead, but the problem remained.)
40 -56 bit encryption is enabled
In “gpedit.msc” Local Policies/Security Settings:
enabled the following policies:
Network access: Allow anonymous SID/name translation
Network access: Let Everyone permissions apply to anonymous users
disabled the following policies:
Network access: Restrict anonymous access to Named Pipes and Shares
Network access: Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts
Network access: Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts and shares
What am I missing? Are there policies on the server that need to be adjusted?
Please help! My business is crippled if I cannot access server files from this workstation. Thank you in advance.

As this thread has been quiet for a while, we assume that the issue has been resolved. At this time, we will mark it as ‘Answered’ as the previous
steps should be helpful for many similar scenarios.  <o:p></o:p>
If the issue still persists and you want to return to this question, please reply this post directly so we will be notified to follow it up. You
can also choose to unmark the answer as you wish.  <o:p></o:p>
In addition, we’d love to hear your feedback about the solution. By sharing your experience you can help other community members facing similar
problems.  <o:p></o:p>
Thanks!<o:p></o:p>
Arnav Sharma | http://arnavsharma.net/ Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
the thread.

I have my Calendar app syncing with iCloud. Every time I open it it says, "Moving Calendars to Server Account..." It runs and runs and does not stop. As a result, I cannot access my calendars. Please help.

I have my Calendar app syncing with iCloud. Every time I open it it says, "Moving Calendars to Server Account..." It runs and runs and does not stop. As a result, I cannot access my calendars. Please help.

I have the same problem, I tried the solution of Dr Cox but that didn't work as he said go to system preference then mail, contacts etc. but I don't have that. Can someone help?
Elaine

Server 2012 R2 SMB - The process cannot access the file '\\server\share\test.txt' because it is being used by another process.

Hi,
We are having issues with Server 2012 R2 SMB shares.
We try to write some changes to a file, but we first create a temporary backup in case the write fails. After the backup is created we write the changes to the file and then we get an error:
The process cannot access the file '\\server\share\test.txt' because it is being used by another process.
It looks like the backup process keeps the original file in use.
The problem doesn't always occur the first time, but almost everytime after 2 or 3 changes. I have provided some code below to reproduce the problem, you can run this in a loop to reproduce.
The problem is that once the error arises, the file remains 'in use' for a while, so you cannot retry but have to wait at least several minutes.
I've already used Process Explorer to analyze, but there are no open file handles.
To reproduce the problem: create two Server 2012 R2 machines and run the below code from one server accessing an SMB share on the other server.
Below is the code I use for testing, if you reproduce the scenario, I'm sure you get the same error.
We are not looking for an alternative way to solve this, but wonder if this is a bug that needs to be reported?
Anybody seen this behavior before or know what's causing it?
The code:
string file =
@"\\server\share\test.txt";
if (File.Exists(file))
File.Copy(file, file +
".bak", true);
File.WriteAllText(file,
"Testje",
Encoding.UTF8);
The error:
System.IO.IOException: The process cannot access the file '\\server\share\test.txt' because it is being used by another process.

Hi,
There is someone else having the same issue with yours. You could try code in the article below:
“The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process”
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawncao/archive/2010/06/04/the-process-cannot-access-the-file-because-it-is-being-used-by-another-process.aspx
If you wonder the root cause of the issue, the .NET Framework Class Libraries forum can help.
Best Regards,
Mandy
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here .
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

User cannot access redirected Documents folder, but can connect to share in Windows Explorer and access folder on server

I am in the final stages of a cross-forest migration. Users have Windows 7 workstations with redirected folders on a Windows Server 2012 box running in the old forest. User accounts were not migrated. The accounts in use have always
been in the "new" forest. One of our challenges was the large volume of data in redirected folders. I made sure users in the target forest had continued to have access to their redirected folders in the old forest and robocopied
the entire users share, copying the permissions with the files. By doing incremental robocopies, we can get a final copy done now in about six hours. The plan was simple: copy the files, do an incremental copy every night, on the night of the cutover
change the folder redirection policy Documents path from
\\oldserver\users\%USERNAME% to
\\newserver\users\%USERNAME%. The policy is configured to NOT copy user files from the existing folder to the new redirected folder. Everything was going well until I tested the policy change. After the folder redirection policy is updated
and applied, the user cannot access the private Documents folder. For example, user Chester Tester logs on as ctester. I open Windows Explorer and click the Documents shortcut. I see one subfolder, which is subfolder of Public Documents.
So I can look at Public Documents but when I click on the Documents folder (Under the Documents library link) I get an access denied error. Now for the kicker, if I open another Windows Explorer window and edit the address bar to
\\newserver\users\ctester, I can navigate the Documents folder tree and see my thousands of documents. What the ....?
I'm hoping this is something really simple to fix!
TIA

HI Vivian,
Thank you for your reply. Yes, the path in Group Policy Folder Redirection Root Path was updated to
\\NEWSERVER\users. I had planned to point this to the distributed file system, so the first used was actually
\\domain\dfs\users. To simplify things I have backed off to copying to just a normal share
\\newserver\users.
We are using BASIC folder redirection and we create a folder for each user under the root path.
We did not want the policy to move content, as we were seeing users requiring 15-20 minute logon times (or higher) after the policy is changed.
Grant the User exclusive right to Documents - Disabled
Move the contents of Documents to the new location - Disabled
Related folder settings
Video - Follow Documents
Music - Follow Documents
Pictures - Follow Documents
Now when I change the folder redirection from old server to new server I now have TWO My Documents folders in the user's redirection folder on the server. The redirected Documents points to an empty folder set. The copied folders with all user
data are there, but folder redirection refuses to recognize the original folder.
I am looking at the full view of the folder, nothing hidden, so I'm wondering how a folder can have two subfolders with the exact same name. For now, I just want the redirection to move from the old server to the new server properly. I deleted
the new My Documents folder, rebooted the user's workstation and tried again. The behavior repeats itself, i.e., a new My Documents folder is always created when the redirection policy is changed from the old server to the new server. The environment
has about 1500 users with approximately 1.3TB of data in the redirected Documents folders. OUCH!

How do i solve - cannot access web server - error message when creating a project in 4.5 with PHP

How do i solve - cannot access web server - error message when creating a project in 4.5 with PHP

Screenshot of how it looks when i try to show a ms access form inside a iframe:
http://oi58.tinypic.com/2vj4ish.jpg

Windows 7 Desktop synchronisation - Windows cannot access \\server\users\name\desktop

Hi there
My client has a laptop which won’t load the desktop when disconnected from the network. When you log on (while disconnected) you get the error
“Windows cannot access \\server\users\name\desktop”
Works as expected while connected to the network.
The server is a Windows Small Business Server 2003 with active directory etc. and roaming profiles turned on. This issue does not occur on other workstations/laptops.
When I check the Users folder on the local system drive there is not a desktop folder. I assume this is the issue although I’m not sure how you would force windows to create one or why one hasn’t been created?
This is a brand new laptop so my initial reaction was to reset the laptop to factory state and then add the laptop back in to the domain. After this process the issue was still present!
I guess the only thing I should mention is that this was shipped as a Home Premium laptop and was then upgraded to Professional using an upgrade key.
I have checked Control Panel, System & Security, System, Advanced, User Profiles and the account shows as Local with Roaming Profiles greyed out.
Any ideas?
Martyn Fewtrell
[email protected]
Martyn Fewtrell TNC (IT Solutions) Ltd Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.tncit.co.uk

Hi,
I am just writing to check the status of this thread. Was the information provided in previous
reply helpful to you? Do you have any further questions or concerns? Please feel free to let us know.
Regards,
Alex Zhao
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are
TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
here.
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Mail cannot access the mail server, but other email clients do.

My web host recently had extended problems with the mail server my sites are on. Now, Mail on my iMac Intel 27 Duo says it cannot access the server. However, Thunderbird and Entourage Mac have no problem. Sending from Mac Mail seems to be Ok as well. I've checked the settings over and over. I received no system disk for this machine when I bought it. Do I need to reinstall Mail, and if so, how?
The info below from Connection Doctor shows it appears to be trying to access through Port 25 but I have Mail set for 587 as instructed by the hosting company. I have renamed private info in the text below.
READ Jan 16 09:56:42.941 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.myemail.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x11f51aed0 -- thread:0x122c48a20
250-servername-a41.g.webhostname.com
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 40960000
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250 8BITMIME

However, Thunderbird and Entourage Mac have no problem. Sending from Mac Mail seems to be Ok as well. I've checked the settings over and over.
Well if TB and Entourage can both send and receive but Mail can only send I can only conclude you missed something in you rechecking. Of course with you being the only one checking you are going to make the same "mistake" and never no it. So post the relevant POP server info for your ISP (edit out personal info and passwords of course):
Account Info:
Incoming Mail server: pop server address
User Name:             required user name POP server is looking for (censor)
Password:              password required by POP server (censor)
Advanced:
Port:      995, 25, default?
Use SSL:   yes or no
Auth:      kind of authentication

Cannot access WL6.1 SP3 server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for