Cannot install GRUB or activate BE (solaris 11 x86)
Hello.
I've upraded my server from solaris express and also expanded rpool by adding then removing mirror. Now when I reboot I got just grub prompt and no any boot menu.
If I enter boot commands manually (root, bootfs, kernel$, etc), I can boot.
I have these BEs:
sergey@nas:~# beadm list
BE Active Mountpoint Space Policy Created
solaris - - 25.86M static 2011-04-18 20:00
solaris-1 R - 10.79G static 2011-11-09 21:09
solaris-2 N / 5.24G static 2012-10-11 23:01
But if I try to activate latest, I get:
sergey@nas:~# beadm activate solaris-2
Device node is not a slice: /dev/rdsk/c10t3d0p1
Unable to activate solaris-2.
Error installing boot files.
As my partitions are x86-like:
sergey@nas:~# zpool status rpool
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can
still be used, but some features are unavailable.
action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the
pool will no longer be accessible on older software versions.
scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h2m with 0 errors on Sat Oct 13 01:37:59 2012
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rpool ONLINE 0 0 0
c10t3d0p1 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
GRUB has the same pretension:
sergey@nas:~# installgrub /boot/grub/stage1 /boot/grub/stage2 /dev/rdsk/c10t3d0p1
raw device must be a root slice (not s2)
Unable to gather device information for /dev/rdsk/c10t3d0p1
So I cannot do anything to reinstall GRUB and make him to see my menu
What can I do in this situation other than full reinstall from empty disk?
Can you describe how you were able to create a root pool in a p* device?
I don't think our installer allows you to do this. See the doc link from Darren.
Currently, a ZFS root pool is only supported on a disk slice, such as c10t3d0s0.
Our disk terminology is confusing:
cntndnpn = larger fdisk partition that contains a disk and disk slices
cntndn represents whole disk
cntndnsn represents a disk slice that is required for booting in this release
Thanks, Cindy
Similar Messages
-
Craptastic, cannot install Grub, [Updated]
I can't remember the voodoo I had to cast last time on this machine, but there is something weird about it. The other machine I did recently is very straightforward. It just works. This one I can't install grub on, and I'm thinking possibly it's partition erroring or it expects some type of special thing to be done in a special order. I just can't remember, and I've tried searching, and as always, liberally reading the documention.
Here's the thing: Arch in this case is going on a SCSI hard disk, alongside an IDE hard-drive with Windows XP on it, which has four partitions. I tried both manually and automatically partitioning the SCSI disk. It partitions fine, I go down the list like a good little boy performing normal operations, but then when Grub install time comes, it just craps out, with "Cannot install grub..blah...blah...check /dev/ttsy5" and because I have the partitions if I make any changes to them, the partitioning program gets posessed and throws partitions all over the drive, and then I have to zero-fill it, which is a 30-min wait per pop.
It actually took me probably weeks to figure this out last time (a year after my first attempt with arch, I got lucky and it worked). If nothing else, I would be grateful if somebody could advise me in great detail of an alternative method to install arch, since it appears my stupidity and my system has trouble with the install disk.
Thanks!!!!Seriously need some help. First off, chroot from another Live CD doesn't work either. Knoppix is all I tried, but I personally don't want to sit around burning disks until I find one that works. So, I need a critique of what specifically I'm doing.
I've established thus far, that Noodle install works. It's also somewhat of a pain to install such old software with lit candles, a bag of wiccan-enscribed bleached chicken bones, and a satanic pentagram just to play standards crossover with. And I mean that in fun. But I don't really want to do it, because it's both hard at first, but the "easy" way out.
Where I want my drives=
SCSI: Arch Linux. Specifically proper udev root=sda1, swap=sda5, that's all there is to it. I don't know why swap wants to be sda5, but I am unable to change that.
IDE: Windows. It has four partitions C:Windows Root, F:Swap, G:Storage, E:Storage
What I have established as well, though is previously not divulged:
From within Wombat's install shell
$mount /dev/discs/disc1/part1 /mnt
$mount -t devfs none /mnt/dev
$mount -t proc none /mnt/proc
$chroot /mnt /bin/bash
$install-grub /dev/discs/disc0/disc /dev/discs/disc1/part1
$exit
^^^Seems to install, but I don't know if it will boot becuase I had Noodle's kernel installed at the time. So I think that's why it wouldn't boot.
From within both Noodle and Knoppix shells
$mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
$mount -o bind /dev /mnt/dev
$mount -t proc none /mnt/proc
$mount -t sysfs none /mnt/sys
$chroot /mnt /bin/bash
$install-grub /dev/hda /dev/sda1
error
When I could get a file to write?...ha, ha.
Gonna try to remember the menu.lst file:
title Arch Linux
root (hd1,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sda1 ro
initrd /boot/initrd26.img
And I have tried variations such as this:
title Arch Linux
root (hd0,0)<---this is wrong according to boot errors
kernel /boot/vmlinuz26 root=/dev/hdb1 ro
initrd /initrd26.img #initrd /initrd26-full.img #initrd /boot/initrd-full.img
Ha, ha. Yeah, I think I found out that using another's install disk for the other's kernel doesn't really work, probably if they are very different kernels. But I am still stuck on this.
[/b] -
"parted" shows my partition table as follows:
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 106MB 105MB primary ntfs boot
2 106MB 64.9GB 64.8GB primary ntfs
4 64.9GB 456GB 391GB extended lba
8 64.9GB 96.3GB 31.4GB logical ext4
9 96.3GB 101GB 4277MB logical linux-swap(v1)
7 101GB 105GB 4273MB logical linux-swap(v1)
5 105GB 327GB 222GB logical ntfs
6 327GB 456GB 129GB logical ntfs
3 456GB 500GB 44.4GB primary ext4
While fdisk shows my partition table as follows:
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 2048 206847 102400 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 206848 126852290 63322721+ 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 890126748 976772663 43322958 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4 126853118 890123492 381635187+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/sda5 204812685 638648009 216917662+ 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6 638648073 890123492 125737710 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda7 196450304 204795903 4172800 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda8 126853120 188086271 30616576 83 Linux
/dev/sda9 188088320 196442111 4176896 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Partition table entries are not in disk order
I have two linux partition installed at
/dev/sda3 -> Arch Liuxx
/dev/sda8 -> Ubuntu.
GRUB is installed at ubuntu (version 2 grub).
- First of all, why is fdisk not able to detect a ext4 partition. It only shows one partition as Linux ie /dev/sda8.
- When I try to install grub by booting to live CD and I type $root (hd0,3), it shows unknown partition 0xf. Even if I use tabs to do autocomplete, I get this
grub> root (hd0,
Possible partitions are:
Partition num: 0, Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x7
Partition num: 1, Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x7
Partition num: 2, Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x7
Partition num: 4, Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x7
Partition num: 5, Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x7
Partition num: 6, Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x82
Partition num: 7, Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
Partition num: 8, Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x82
grub> root (hd0,
God knows why it shows partition number 7 as ext2fs. I cannot choose either 8 or 3 partition
grub> root (hd0,3)
Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0xf
grub> root (hd0,8)
Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x82
Also, I need to install grub on /dev/sda3 (my arch linux partition) which is currently on UBUNTU's partition so its also not able to find any boot files if I try to mount arch partition and do $root-install --root-directory=/mnt/myarchmounted --recheck /dev/sda.
So, how should I proceed?
TL/DR: I want a way to
- Format ubuntu partition and remove it completely (including its own grub)
- Install GRUB on Arch's partition, so that I can boot it after ubuntu's partition is removed.shadyabhi wrote:
"parted" shows my partition table as follows:
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 106MB 105MB primary ntfs boot
2 106MB 64.9GB 64.8GB primary ntfs
4 64.9GB 456GB 391GB extended lba
8 64.9GB 96.3GB 31.4GB logical ext4
9 96.3GB 101GB 4277MB logical linux-swap(v1)
7 101GB 105GB 4273MB logical linux-swap(v1)
5 105GB 327GB 222GB logical ntfs
6 327GB 456GB 129GB logical ntfs
3 456GB 500GB 44.4GB primary ext4
While fdisk shows my partition table as follows:
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 2048 206847 102400 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 206848 126852290 63322721+ 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 890126748 976772663 43322958 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4 126853118 890123492 381635187+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/sda5 204812685 638648009 216917662+ 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6 638648073 890123492 125737710 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda7 196450304 204795903 4172800 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda8 126853120 188086271 30616576 83 Linux
/dev/sda9 188088320 196442111 4176896 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Partition table entries are not in disk order
I have two linux partition installed at
/dev/sda3 -> Arch Liuxx
/dev/sda8 -> Ubuntu.
GRUB is installed at ubuntu (version 2 grub).
- First of all, why is fdisk not able to detect a ext4 partition. It only shows one partition as Linux ie /dev/sda8.
Type code of /dev/sda3 is wrong, it should be 0x83, not 0x07 (type code for FAT/NTFS partitions)
- When I try to install grub by booting to live CD and I type $root (hd0,3), it shows unknown partition 0xf. Even if I use tabs to do autocomplete, I get this
grub legacy numbers partitions from 0 , wherein (hd0,3) corresponds to /dev/sda4 (the extended partition in your disk). IN your case you should try (hd0,2) for /dev/sda3 (after changing the part type code to 0x83)
God knows why it shows partition number 7 as ext2fs. I cannot choose either 8 or 3 partition
grub> root (hd0,3)
Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0xf
grub> root (hd0,8)
Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x82
(hd0,7) == /dev/sda8 == ext4
(hd0,3) == /dev/sda4 == extended part
(hd0,8) == /dev/sda9 == linux swap
Also, I need to install grub on /dev/sda3 (my arch linux partition) which is currently on UBUNTU's partition so its also not able to find any boot files if I try to mount arch partition and do $root-install --root-directory=/mnt/myarchmounted --recheck /dev/sda.
So, how should I proceed?
TL/DR: I want a way to
- Format ubuntu partition and remove it completely (including its own grub)
- Install GRUB on Arch's partition, so that I can boot it after ubuntu's partition is removed.
Your question is not clear. But you can boot into Arch, install its grub2 package (recommended over grub legacy), install grub2 to /boot in Arch, and finally format ubuntu completely. Follow the Archwiki GRUB2 page. It explains everything. -
Dual booting win 7 and arch: cannot install grub to partition
I have read the arch wiki page on dual booting and several other sources on line, but I am still struggling to get this to work.
I am trying to dual boot arch and windows 7 on my lenovo ideapad s205. the machine comes with windows 7 pre-installed.
I shrank the win 7 partition and added an extended partition with 3 logical partions for /boot, swap, and /.
I am able to install and run arch by installing grub to the mbr. when I do this, though, I cannot boot windows. (the windows section of grub menu.lst is uncommented and points toward hda0,0. I have tried hda 0,1 as well).
I have also tried to use the windows boot loader to load arch, as described in the arch wiki page on dual booting. The problem here is that, taking this approach, I should install grub to my /boot partition, but when I try to do this, the installer only allows me to install grub to sda or sdb (the usb stick).
I have read that grub should be able to boot linux from a logical partition. Is this so?
Is there something wrong with the arch installer that it is not giving me the option of installing to a partition rather than the mbr, or is this a problem with my partition scheme, or something else?
I am tempted to remove lenovo's recovery system, but on the other hand, I have already needed to use it several times while monkeying around with installing arch.
Thanks for any help.
UPDATE:
I now have the laptop dual-booting win 7 and arch. My solution ( adapted from here: http://helms-deep.cable.nu/~rwh/blog/?p=177) was to:
1. installed arch on the partitions I had created for it, but skipped the "install bootloader" stage.
2. in win 7, I downloaded and installed EasyBCD and made an entry for arch in it. I checked the option to "Use EasyBCD's copy of GRUB"
3. When I restarted, I got a grub error because the entry in grub's menu.lst was pointing at the wrong partitions for the kernel and root.
4. So I went back into the arch live disk, mounted the boot partition and edited menu.lst.
Now when I start the laptop, the windows boot loader starts and I can choose between win 7 and arch. when I select arch, grub4dos starts and gives me the option to start arch. this is not particularly elegant (nor is it fast), so I think this solution is less than ideal, but it does work.
I'd be interestd in any thoughts about what went wrong and what a better solution would be.
thanks.
Last edited by ratchet (2011-10-10 19:09:16)ratchet wrote:II am able to install and run arch by installing grub to the mbr. when I do this, though, I cannot boot windows. (the windows section of grub menu.lst is uncommented and points toward hda0,0. I have tried hda 0,1 as well).
Is this a typo in your post or how it was in menu.lst? Surely it should be hd0,0 and not hda0,0? The entry I have in my menu.lst is as follows:
# (2) Windows
title Windows
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
makeactive
chainloader +1
What was yours?
Last edited by JHeaton (2011-10-10 20:18:22) -
[solved] Cannot install grub on Arch installation!
I'm trying to install Arch on my new Laptop. Almost everything works fine until I come to the point where GRUB will be installed (to the MBR). Installaton fails and I'm told to have a look on tty5 for error messages. Doing so I read:
grub> root (hd0,3)
Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x7
grub> setup (hd0)
Error 17: Cannot mount selected partition
grub> quit
AnyIdeas what I could do?
By the way, I'm installing the 64Bit Version 0.8 on a computer that currently runs "bad, bad Vista". I'm going to kill Vista anyway, sooner or later, but I wanted to have a try on getting them both on one computer. Might that be a problem?
Last edited by saciel (2007-06-06 00:31:15)The layout preset by the factory is the following:
sda1: some sort of windows configuration backup blabla
sda2: Vista System
then there is roughly one gigabyte of free space then
sda4: which was a preset ntfs partition for data
I decided to turn 4 in arch root partition, leaving everyting else unchanged for an instance (no additional swap/boot partition).
By the way, I tried to install Grub directly on partition 4 (it is an ext3 now), too afterwards, which failed with the same error.
Last edited by saciel (2007-06-06 00:16:07) -
Can't install Java Enterprise 7 on Solaris x86
I am new to solaris and JES. I downloaded JES 7 and followed the document. However I got this error
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: JavaStudio
I googled and found that it was related to classpath/java_home. I don;t know how it is set up in solaris 10. but i can issue java and javac with no problem.. Any help is appreciated.
bc2002Officially Java Studio Enterprise 7 is supported on the following platforms:
■ Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP1a
■ Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional SP4
■ Solaris� 9 OS Update 7 (x86)
■ Solaris� 8 OS Update 7 (UltraSPARC� III)
■ Solaris� 9 OS Update 7 (UltraSPARC� III)
And here is detailed instruction for Solaris:
http://docs.sun.com/source/817-7971/Sol_ideinstall.html -
Problem while installing oracle 10g 2 on solaris x86
bash-3.00$ ./runInstaller
Starting Oracle Universal Installer...
Checking installer requirements...
Checking operating system version: must be 5.10. Actual 5.10
Passed
Checking Temp space: must be greater than 250 MB. Actual 1133 MB Passed
Checking swap space: must be greater than 500 MB. Actual 2070 MB Passed
Checking monitor: must be configured to display at least 256 colors. Actual 1
6777216 Passed
All installer requirements met.
Preparing to launch Oracle Universal Installer from /tmp/OraInstall2008-12-27_11
-46-01PM. Please wait ...bash-3.00$
After that $ prompt I do not get anything... did I miss out something...
bash-3.00$ env |grep -i oracle
OLDPWD=/export/home/oracle
MAIL=/var/mail/oracle
PWD=/export/home/oracle/database
HOME=/export/home/oracle
LOGNAME=oracle
Plz help....I think it has got to do something with my profile...
plz see...
bash-3.00$ cat local.profile
# Copyright (c) 2001 by Sun Microsystems, Inc.
# All rights reserved.
# ident "@(#)local.profile 1.10 01/06/23 SMI"
stty istrip
PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/ucb:/etc:.
export PATH
bash-3.00$
bash-3.00$ echo $DISPLAY
unknown:0.0
bash-3.00$ xclock
bash: xclock: command not found
bash-3.00$ usr/openwin/bin/xclock
bash: usr/openwin/bin/xclock: No such file or directory
bash-3.00$ -
Solaris 10 x86 5.10 cannot install Oracle 10g (needs 5.9 or less!)
I installed the latest Solaris 10 x86 rev 5.10 and then downloaded the "New" Oracle 10g for Solaris x86 oddly but not suprisingly the "New" Oracle 10g only installs on Solaris 10 x86 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9 GO FIGURE.
Seem there should be a way to fake out the software to see a different version.
Anybody know how to do this?
thanks
PhilAnd another workaround that seems to work can be found here:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/fintanr/20040803
To quote from that page:
Oracle 10g install on Solaris 10 workaround
Quick work around for installing Oracle 10g on Solaris 10 (in our case on a v20z).
After creating your staging area you run the Oracle installer and get an error similar to the following
$ ./runInstaller
Starting Oracle Universal Installer...
Checking installer requirements...
Checking operating system version: must be 5.6, 5.7, 5.8 or 5.9. Actual 5.10
Failed <<<<
To work around this you need to edit the oraparam.ini file, in our case this is /export/ora/Disk1/install/oraparam.ini.
Edit the section
[Certified Versions]
#You can customise error message shown for failure through CERTIFIED_VERSION_FAI
LURE_MESSAGE
Solaris=5.6,5.7,5.8,5.9
to be
[Certified Versions]
#You can customise error message shown for failure through CERTIFIED_VERSION_FAI
LURE_MESSAGE
Solaris=5.6,5.7,5.8,5.9,5.10
And thats it, just run through your install as normal. -
Help with oracle 10g install on solaris x86
hi, i downloaded solaris 10 from oracle site (sol-10-u8-ga-x86-dvd.iso) and i have installed it on vmware. i was going through the installation guide for oracle 10 for solaris x86 and while on the pre-installation steps, i issued this command
# /bin/isainfo -kv
and it gave me
# 64-bit amd64 kernel modules
instead of
# 32-bit i386 kernel modules
as the guide expected.
please what can i do, cos the guide says if i dont see the later, the installation cannot complete.
thnxFirst check you Operating System Bit information whether it is 64 or 32 bit , for this first check any of the command path
Example ls command
$ which ls
/usr/sbin/ls
$ file /usr/sbin/ls
It will show you whether your OS is 64 bit or 32 bit and accordingly download the software from below link ,if it is showing 64 bit os then you have to download 64 bit database software .
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/database10g/downloads/index.html -
Installing Oracle VDI 3.3 into a zone on Solaris x86
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to install Oracle VDI into a zone on an Oracle Solaris Express x86 machine. When I unzip the installer and run ./vda-install in the top dir I get this error:
Oracle VDI 3.3 Installation
+ Installing Oracle VDI Core...
+ Installing Oracle VDI Center Agent...
+ Installing MySQL Database...
+ Installing Oracle VDI Web server...
+ Installing Oracle VDI Manager...
+ Installing RDP Broker...
+ Installing Sun Ray Client...
+ Installing Java Runtime Environment...
+ Installing Sun Ray Server...
Error: There was a problem installing Sun Ray Software 5
Check '/var/sadm/install/logs/vda-install.2011_08_26_19:19:04.log' for details.
Error: There was a problem installing Sun Ray Software 5
Check '/var/sadm/install/logs/vda-install.2011_08_26_19:19:04.log' for details.
It seems that I cannot install Sun Ray Server into a non-global zone. Well that's fine by me provided I don't actually need it.
And her's my question: what of the above do I actually need?
GüntherI guess, it's clear that you need a valid support contract for your Hardware, otherwise your in troubles. A not so bad article about that you kind find at http://www.ypass.net/blog/2010/04/solaris-licensing-changes-the-real-story/
4.) When you purchase hardware, you receive an addendum to the entitlement that grants that piece of hardware perpetual, non-transferable license and entitlement to Solaris.
and additional ...
Sun Servers with a Support Contract
- For people running Solaris on Sun hardware with a Sun hardware support contract, your support contract grants you rights to run future versions of Solaris. -
Install Developer 9.0.4 On solaris x86
Hi All
we have installed oracle database 10g rel2 on solaris x86 then we are trying to install oracle application server forms and reports services standalone on the same machine but we have a problem
after running ./runInstaller we have an error
./runInstaller: /export/home/cd1/disk1/install/solaris/runInstaller: cannot execute
any one can helpHi.
I've installed it on fedora, Red Hat as 2.1 and 3.0. Here are the instructions I followed:
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/Linux/ArticlesLinux.php
I know they're not what you're looking for but they might give you some ideas.
Cheers
Tim... -
Cannot install itunes, I keep getting this message:An error occured during the installation of assembly 'Microsoft .VC80.CRT .type="win32" ,version="8.0.50727.6195".publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b".processorArchitectu re="x86"'. Please refer to Help and
Repair your Apple Application Support.
Control Panel > Programs n Features > highlight AAS, click CHANGE the REPAIR -
Cannot install itunes Keep getting this message:An error occured during the installation of assembly 'Microsoft .VC80.CRT .type="win32" ,version="8.0.50727.6195".publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b".processorArchitectu re="x86"'. Please refer to Help and sup
These ones are typically caused by underlying problems on the PC that also often cause Windows Updates to fail to install. If we can fix the Windows Update trouble, we can usually get the iTunes trouble cleaned up en passant.
Go into your Windows update and try to check for new updates. If updates install, stock up on the ones you're behind on, restarting the PC if requested to do so. After the restart, try installing iTunes again. Does it go through this time for you?
If windows updates fail to install, go into your Update History and doubleclick the failures. What alphanumeric codes appear for you? (For example, 8007000B.) -
Install oracle 8.1.7 on Solaris(x86) 10 b72
Has anyone Installed oracle 8.1.7 on Solaris(x86) 10 b72???
When I run runInstaller I have
135$ Initializing Java Virtual Machine from ../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/jre. Please wait...
ld.so.1: /ora_inst/stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/i386/native_threads/jre: fatal: relocation error: file /ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so: symbol XShmQueryExtension: referenced symbol not found (/ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so)
ld.so.1: /ora_inst/stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/i386/native_threads/jre: fatal: relocation error: file /ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so: symbol XShmQueryExtension: referenced symbol not found (/ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so)
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:try this:
LD_PRELOAD="libX11.so libXext.so" ; export LD_PRELOAD
./runInstaller -
Install error for Oracle 10g on Solaris x86 64-bit. NETCA won't run
Hi All,
I'm installing Oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris x86 64-bit. I run the Oracle installer and all runs well until the NETCA portion of the install. It then errors (error file below). When i attempt to run NETCA outside of the installer i'm getting the same error output. I have verified my OS version and that all dependent packages are installed. I'm not sure what is causing this. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
thanks, dave
ERROR FILE:
An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0xFEEF24E8
Function=strchr+0x8
Library=/lib/libc.so.1
Current Java thread:
at oracle.net.common.NetGetEnv.getDNSDomain(Native Method)
at oracle.net.ca.ConfigureProfile.setDefaultProfileParams(Unknown Source)
at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.setupConfigObjects(Unknown Source)
at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.<init>(Unknown Source)
at oracle.net.ca.NetCA.main(Unknown Source)
Dynamic libraries:
0x8050000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/bin/java
0xfefc0000 /lib/libthread.so.1
0xfefd0000 /lib/libdl.so.1
0xfeed0000 /lib/libc.so.1
0xfea00000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
0xfee80000 /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1
0xfee50000 /lib/libsocket.so.1
0xfedc0000 /lib/libnsl.so.1
0xfeda0000 /lib/libm.so.1
0xfeeb0000 /usr/lib/libsched.so.1
0xfe9a0000 /lib/libm.so.2
0xfed50000 /lib/libscf.so.1
0xfe980000 /lib/libdoor.so.1
0xfe960000 /lib/libuutil.so.1
0xfe940000 /lib/libmd5.so.1
0xfe920000 /lib/libmp.so.2
0xfe8e0000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so
0xfe890000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so
0xfe850000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so
0xfe830000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so
0xf1a00000 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xfc780000 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/methods_en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xf13c0000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
0xf0f90000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so
0xf0f30000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/motif21/libmawt.so
0xf0d50000 /usr/dt/lib/libXm.so.4
0xf0cf0000 /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
0xf0cc0000 /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
0xf1890000 /usr/openwin/lib/libXtst.so.1
0xf0c30000 /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
0xf0be0000 /usr/openwin/lib/libdps.so.5
0xf0a90000 /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
0xf0a70000 /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
0xf0a30000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnjni10.so
0xefe00000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1
0xefc60000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnnz10.so
0xf0a10000 /lib/libkstat.so.1
0xefc40000 /lib/libgen.so.1
0xefc20000 /lib/librt.so.1
0xefbf0000 /lib/libaio.so.1
0xefbd0000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libldapjclnt10.so
Heap at VM Abort:
Heap
def new generation total 576K, used 343K [0xf1e00000, 0xf1ea0000, 0xf22e0000)
eden space 512K, 55% used [0xf1e00000, 0xf1e467f8, 0xf1e80000)
from space 64K, 96% used [0xf1e80000, 0xf1e8f798, 0xf1e90000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xf1e90000, 0xf1e90000, 0xf1ea0000)
tenured generation total 1408K, used 338K [0xf22e0000, 0xf2440000, 0xf5e00000)
the space 1408K, 24% used [0xf22e0000, 0xf2334ab8, 0xf2334c00, 0xf2440000)
compacting perm gen total 4096K, used 3580K [0xf5e00000, 0xf6200000, 0xf9e00000)
the space 4096K, 87% used [0xf5e00000, 0xf617f170, 0xf617f200, 0xf6200000)
Local Time = Tue Aug 29 13:49:22 2006
Elapsed Time = 225
# The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode)
#I have the same problem on Linux Debian 3.0.
My /etc/hosts looks like:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
#192.168.100.1 bt.lan.home bt
#192.168.100.5 jacek.lan.home jacek
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhostsPlease help.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Using Discoverer 4i to view data on SQL Server
Hello, We have Discoverer 4i set up to work with Oracle 9i. Now our Discoverer users want to use Discoverer to view data that is in SQL Severer. We don't want to rebuild data in SQL Server into 9i. What can we set up so 4i can view and maybe update d
-
Where has the calendar list view gone?
Where has the list view gone from the calendar in iOS 7 iPhone? The current view is awful and verges on unusable.
-
Hi I have a problem. My website http://www.advancedhomeconstruction.com/images/index.html has a flash album. It works on my computer but not on the server. I copied the whole directory on the server from my computer. It has the AC_RunActiveContent.js
-
Dreamweaver MX 2004 won't import Jpg
Im having a weird issue bringing jpeg files into dreamweaver mx 2004...it won't let me do it. Anyone seen this problem and how to fix it? thanks in advance
-
HT1904 Every time I download music from iTunes , it always show: download error, please try again
Every time I download music from iTunes , it always show: download error, please try again(i5) But I can download in my iPad