CANNOT USE "Advanced Custom Search Form For ADF"

Hi,
I have tried the application on this old post but it doesnt work on jdev 11g even after migrating.
Can some body tell me whats wrong and / or post a working application here.
Need to use this functionality urgently.
the original post is here.
http://my.opera.com/dominionspy/blog/2007/02/26/an-advanced-custom-search-form-for-adf
Any help is really appreciated.

Thanks for your reply.
Could you tell me where can i find example implementations of the query model classes.
they have mentioned it to be found in "For an example implementations of the different model classes for a query, see the classes located in the oracle.adfdemo.view.query.rich package of the ADF Faces sample application."
Also where can i get the source code for this http://jdevadf.oracle.com/adf-richclient-demo/faces/components/query.jspx
thanks in advance

Similar Messages

Problems with custom search form in adf

Hi,
I am using JDeveloper 11.1.2.4. please can you help with this issue?
I've created a custom search form with the help from this link.
Jdeveloper,Oracle ADF &amp; Java: Implementing custom search form in ADF programmatically (Without using af:query)
I've created two bind variables SkuBind & ImperfectBind and a View Criteria.
My problem is when I press Search button, it does not filter based on values of the bind variables in the View Criteria.
I rightly get bind variable values in the System output though
Skubind = 1000
Imperfectbind = N
but there is no where clause
where clause = null
public void SearchOddShoes(ActionEvent actionEvent) {
AppModuleImpl am = (AppModuleImpl)resolvElDC("AppModuleDataControl");
ViewObject oddShoeVo = am.getRtnOddShoesVO1();
oddShoeVo.setNamedWhereClauseParam("SkuBind", skuPgBind.getValue());
oddShoeVo.setNamedWhereClauseParam("ImperfectBind", imperfectPgBind.getValue());
System.out.print("Named Skubind = " + oddShoeVo.getNamedWhereClauseParam("SkuBind") +"\n");
System.out.print("Named Imperfectbind = " + oddShoeVo.getNamedWhereClauseParam("ImperfectBind") +"\n");
System.out.print("where clause = " + oddShoeVo.getWhereClause()+"\n");
System.out.print("where clause params= " + oddShoeVo.getWhereClauseParams()+"\n");
System.out.print("Sql is " + oddShoeVo.getQuery()+"\n");
oddShoeVo.executeQuery();
public Object resolvElDC(String data) {
           FacesContext fc = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
           Application app = fc.getApplication();
           ExpressionFactory elFactory = app.getExpressionFactory();
           ELContext elContext = fc.getELContext();
           ValueExpression valueExp =
                   elFactory.createValueExpression(elContext, "#{data." + data + ".dataProvider}", Object.class);
           return valueExp.getValue(elContext);
thanks

Not clear what part of the code doesn't work. Assuming that you did check that the code you wrote executed
the problem may be the following.
You need to add partial trigger on the destination component.
Add ...
oddShoeVo.executeQuery();
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(HERE_THE_BIND_NAME_OF_YOUR_TABLE);
Also I don't see that you acctually use View Criteria. There are specific way to apply View Criteria programatically and I don't see that you use it.
The simpliest way is just to change the VO query to embed bind variables into the query
E.G.
select 1
from dual
where some_column= :P_PARAM1

How to restrict customer records being displayed using 'sales_channel_type' criteria in customer search form at 11g?

OS: Linux
DB: 11.2.0.3
ERP: 11g
Hi There,
     I would like to create a new custom responsibility, which the responsibility is having access to Standard Customer Form (ARXCUDCI.fmb) , but I would like to make a restriction in the customer search form is that, everytime the responsibility user search by customer number, customer name, party name or what ever search field, I would like to limit to restrict further of searching criteria where SALES_CHANNEL_TYPE = 'RTL' is allowed to populate the customer records, there rest of customer records are not allowed to search out.
    This SALES_CHANNEL_TYPE column is from HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS table.
    I have tried the Form Personalization already, but the customer searching form has too many fields for user to search, therefore form personalization will be putting all over the places in the form. Therefore I saw others recommended of doing "Custom DLL"...may I know for my scenario, how to I go about Customer DLL? or any other more effective solution?
   Appreciate if anyone can share your experience related to matter above.
Regards,
Lygine

Hi Lygine,
The personalization i sent you works in this way:
-It does not matter which field you choose to enter the query.
-If a record is found, when the form opens and the cursor hits the Customer Name field, the personalization looks for the content of the Sales Channel field.
-If the content of this field is different from the 'RTL' string, the form Customers form (ARXCUDCI) is cleared.
Independently from the field you fill to perform the query, is a record is found, the Customer Name field is the first the cursor hits when the form is opened.
Octavio

Custom edit form for my Wiki Page library with only "Page Name" field included

I want to create a new custom edit form for my Wiki page library, and to only allow users to edit the Page name inside the edit form. now i created a new Edit form using SharePoint Designer , and i select the Enterprisewiki content type for it , which generates
the following markup :-
<%@ Page language="C#" MasterPageFile="~masterurl/default.master" Inherits="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.WebPartPage,Microsoft.SharePoint,Version=15.0.0.0,Culture=neutral,PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" meta:webpartpageexpansion="full" meta:progid="SharePoint.WebPartPage.Document" %>
<%@ Register Tagprefix="SharePoint" Namespace="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls" Assembly="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %> <%@ Register Tagprefix="Utilities" Namespace="Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities" Assembly="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %> <%@ Import Namespace="Microsoft.SharePoint" %> <%@ Assembly Name="Microsoft.Web.CommandUI, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %> <%@ Register Tagprefix="WebPartPages" Namespace="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages" Assembly="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderPageTitle" runat="server">
<SharePoint:ListFormPageTitle runat="server"/>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderPageTitleInTitleArea" runat="server">
<span class="die">
<SharePoint:ListProperty Property="LinkTitle" runat="server" id="ID_LinkTitle"/>
</span>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderPageImage" runat="server">
<img src="/_layouts/15/images/blank.gif?rev=23" width='1' height='1' alt="" />
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderMain" runat="server">
<SharePoint:UIVersionedContent UIVersion="4" runat="server">
<ContentTemplate>
<div style="padding-left:5px">
</ContentTemplate>
</SharePoint:UIVersionedContent>
<table class="ms-core-tableNoSpace" id="onetIDListForm">
<tr>
<td>
<WebPartPages:WebPartZone runat="server" FrameType="None" ID="Main" Title="loc:Main"><ZoneTemplate>
<WebPartPages:DataFormWebPart runat="server" EnableOriginalValue="False" DisplayName="Customer Service KB" ViewFlag="1048584" ViewContentTypeId="" Default="FALSE" ListUrl="" ListDisplayName="" ListName="{6A6ECE84-4D39-48E2-BD6A-C20B2AC6355B}" ListId="6a6ece84-4d39-48e2-bd6a-c20b2ac6355b" PageType="PAGE_EDITFORM" PageSize="-1" UseSQLDataSourcePaging="True" DataSourceID="" ShowWithSampleData="False" AsyncRefresh="False" ManualRefresh="False" AutoRefresh="False" AutoRefreshInterval="60" NoDefaultStyle="TRUE" InitialAsyncDataFetch="False" Title="Customer Service KB" FrameType="None" SuppressWebPartChrome="False" Description="" IsIncluded="True" PartOrder="2" FrameState="Normal" AllowRemove="True" AllowZoneChange="True" AllowMinimize="True" AllowConnect="True" AllowEdit="True" AllowHide="True" IsVisible="True" DetailLink="" HelpLink="" HelpMode="Modeless" Dir="Default" PartImageSmall="" MissingAssembly="Cannot import this Web Part." PartImageLarge="" IsIncludedFilter="" ExportControlledProperties="True" ConnectionID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" ID="g_f1c88e12_e91d_4300_91f2_62f0bd7825fb" ChromeType="None" ExportMode="All" __MarkupType="vsattributemarkup" __WebPartId="{F1C88E12-E91D-4300-91F2-62F0BD7825FB}" __AllowXSLTEditing="true" WebPart="true" Height="" Width=""><DataSources>
<SharePoint:SPDataSource runat="server" DataSourceMode="ListItem" SelectCommand="<View><Query><Where><Eq><FieldRef Name="ContentType"/><Value Type="Text">Enterprise Wiki Page</Value></Eq></Where></Query></View>" UseInternalName="True" UseServerDataFormat="True"><SelectParameters><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="ListItemId" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="0" Name="ListItemId"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="weburl" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="http://sharepointdev:12341/sites/wiki1" Name="weburl"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="ListID" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="{6A6ECE84-4D39-48E2-BD6A-C20B2AC6355B}" Name="ListID"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter>
</SelectParameters><UpdateParameters><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="ListItemId" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="0" Name="ListItemId"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="weburl" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="http://sharepointdev:12341/sites/wiki1" Name="weburl"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="ListID" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="{6A6ECE84-4D39-48E2-BD6A-C20B2AC6355B}" Name="ListID"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter>
</UpdateParameters><InsertParameters><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="ListItemId" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="0" Name="ListItemId"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="weburl" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="http://sharepointdev:12341/sites/wiki1" Name="weburl"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="ListID" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="{6A6ECE84-4D39-48E2-BD6A-C20B2AC6355B}" Name="ListID"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter>
</InsertParameters><DeleteParameters><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="ListItemId" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="0" Name="ListItemId"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="weburl" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="http://sharepointdev:12341/sites/wiki1" Name="weburl"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter><WebPartPages:DataFormParameter ParameterKey="ListID" PropertyName="ParameterValues" DefaultValue="{6A6ECE84-4D39-48E2-BD6A-C20B2AC6355B}" Name="ListID"></WebPartPages:DataFormParameter>
</DeleteParameters>
</SharePoint:SPDataSource>
</DataSources>
<Xsl>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:dsp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/dsp" version="1.0" exclude-result-prefixes="xsl msxsl ddwrt" xmlns:ddwrt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WebParts/v2/DataView/runtime" xmlns:asp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ASPNET/20" xmlns:__designer="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WebParts/v2/DataView/designer" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:msxsl="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xslt" xmlns:SharePoint="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls" xmlns:ddwrt2="urn:frontpage:internal">
<xsl:output method="html" indent="no"/>
<xsl:decimal-format NaN=""/>
<xsl:param name="dvt_apos">'</xsl:param>
<xsl:param name="ManualRefresh"></xsl:param>
<xsl:variable name="dvt_1_automode">0</xsl:variable>
<xsl:template match="/" xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:dsp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/dsp" xmlns:asp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ASPNET/20" xmlns:__designer="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WebParts/v2/DataView/designer" xmlns:SharePoint="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls">
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="($ManualRefresh = 'True')">
<table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<xsl:call-template name="dvt_1"/>
</td>
<td width="1%" class="ms-vb" valign="top">
<img src="/_layouts/15/images/staticrefresh.gif" id="ManualRefresh" border="0" onclick="javascript: {ddwrt:GenFireServerEvent('__cancel')}" alt="Click here to refresh the dataview."/>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<xsl:call-template name="dvt_1"/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template name="dvt_1">
<xsl:variable name="dvt_StyleName">ListForm</xsl:variable>
<xsl:variable name="Rows" select="/dsQueryResponse/Rows/Row"/>
<div>
<span id="part1">
<table border="0" width="100%">
<xsl:call-template name="dvt_1.body">
<xsl:with-param name="Rows" select="$Rows"/>
</xsl:call-template>
</table>
</span>
<SharePoint:AttachmentUpload runat="server" ControlMode="Edit"/>
<SharePoint:ItemHiddenVersion runat="server" ControlMode="Edit"/>
</div>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template name="dvt_1.body">
<xsl:param name="Rows"/>
<tr>
<td class="ms-toolbar" nowrap="nowrap">
<table>
<tr>
<td width="99%" class="ms-toolbar" nowrap="nowrap"><IMG SRC="/_layouts/15/images/blank.gif" width="1" height="18"/></td>
<td class="ms-toolbar" nowrap="nowrap">
<SharePoint:SaveButton runat="server" ControlMode="Edit" id="savebutton1"/>
</td>
<td class="ms-separator"> </td>
<td class="ms-toolbar" nowrap="nowrap" align="right">
<SharePoint:GoBackButton runat="server" ControlMode="Edit" id="gobackbutton1"/>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="ms-toolbar" nowrap="nowrap">
<SharePoint:FormToolBar runat="server" ControlMode="Edit"/>
<SharePoint:ItemValidationFailedMessage runat="server" ControlMode="Edit"/>
</td>
</tr>
<xsl:for-each select="$Rows">
<xsl:call-template name="dvt_1.rowedit"/>
</xsl:for-each>
<tr>
<td class="ms-toolbar" nowrap="nowrap">
<table>
<tr>
<td class="ms-descriptiontext" nowrap="nowrap">
<SharePoint:CreatedModifiedInfo ControlMode="Edit" runat="server"/>
</td>
<td width="99%" class="ms-toolbar" nowrap="nowrap"><IMG SRC="/_layouts/15/images/blank.gif" width="1" height="18"/></td>
<td class="ms-toolbar" nowrap="nowrap">
<SharePoint:SaveButton runat="server" ControlMode="Edit" id="savebutton2"/>
</td>
<td class="ms-separator"> </td>
<td class="ms-toolbar" nowrap="nowrap" align="right">
<SharePoint:GoBackButton runat="server" ControlMode="Edit" id="gobackbutton2"/>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template name="dvt_1.rowedit">
<xsl:param name="Pos" select="position()"/>
<tr>
<td>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td width="190px" valign="top" class="ms-formlabel">
<H3 class="ms-standardheader">
<nobr>Title (Display In Search)</nobr>
</H3>
</td>
<td width="400px" valign="top" class="ms-formbody">
<SharePoint:FormField runat="server" id="ff1{$Pos}" ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="Title" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u',concat('ff1',$Pos),'Value','ValueChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(@ID)),'@Title')}"/>
<SharePoint:FieldDescription runat="server" id="ff1description{$Pos}" FieldName="Title" ControlMode="Edit"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="190px" valign="top" class="ms-formlabel">
<H3 class="ms-standardheader">
<nobr>Standard<span class="ms-formvalidation"> *</span>
</nobr>
</H3>
</td>
<td width="400px" valign="top" class="ms-formbody">
<SharePoint:FormField runat="server" id="ff2{$Pos}" ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="Standard" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u',concat('ff2',$Pos),'Value','ValueChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(@ID)),'@Standard')}"/>
<SharePoint:FieldDescription runat="server" id="ff2description{$Pos}" FieldName="Standard" ControlMode="Edit"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="190px" valign="top" class="ms-formlabel">
<H3 class="ms-standardheader">
<nobr>Document Type<span class="ms-formvalidation"> *</span>
</nobr>
</H3>
</td>
<td width="400px" valign="top" class="ms-formbody">
<SharePoint:FormField runat="server" id="ff3{$Pos}" ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="Document_x0020_Type" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u',concat('ff3',$Pos),'Value','ValueChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(@ID)),'@Document_x0020_Type')}"/>
<SharePoint:FieldDescription runat="server" id="ff3description{$Pos}" FieldName="Document_x0020_Type" ControlMode="Edit"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="190px" valign="top" class="ms-formlabel">
<H3 class="ms-standardheader">
<nobr>Departments<span class="ms-formvalidation"> *</span>
</nobr>
</H3>
</td>
<td width="400px" valign="top" class="ms-formbody">
<SharePoint:FormField runat="server" id="ff4{$Pos}" ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="Departments" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u',concat('ff4',$Pos),'Value','ValueChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(@ID)),'@Departments')}"/>
<SharePoint:FieldDescription runat="server" id="ff4description{$Pos}" FieldName="Departments" ControlMode="Edit"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="190px" valign="top" class="ms-formlabel">
<H3 class="ms-standardheader">
<nobr>Hide physical URLs from search</nobr>
</H3>
</td>
<td width="400px" valign="top" class="ms-formbody">
<SharePoint:FormField runat="server" id="ff5{$Pos}" ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="PublishingIsFurlPage" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u',concat('ff5',$Pos),'Value','ValueChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(@ID)),'@PublishingIsFurlPage')}"/>
<SharePoint:FieldDescription runat="server" id="ff5description{$Pos}" FieldName="PublishingIsFurlPage" ControlMode="Edit"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="190px" valign="top" class="ms-formlabel">
<H3 class="ms-standardheader">
<nobr>Page Content</nobr>
</H3>
</td>
<td width="400px" valign="top" class="ms-formbody">
<SharePoint:FormField runat="server" id="ff6{$Pos}" ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="PublishingPageContent" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u',concat('ff6',$Pos),'Value','ValueChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(@ID)),'@PublishingPageContent')}"/>
<SharePoint:FieldDescription runat="server" id="ff6description{$Pos}" FieldName="PublishingPageContent" ControlMode="Edit"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr id="idAttachmentsRow">
<td nowrap="true" valign="top" class="ms-formlabel" width="20%">
<SharePoint:FieldLabel ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="Attachments" runat="server"/>
</td>
<td valign="top" class="ms-formbody" width="80%">
<SharePoint:FormField runat="server" id="AttachmentsField" ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="Attachments" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u','AttachmentsField','Value','ValueChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(@ID)),'@Attachments')}"/>
<script>
var elm = document.getElementById("idAttachmentsTable");
if (elm == null || elm.rows.length == 0)
document.getElementById("idAttachmentsRow").style.display='none';
</script>
</td>
</tr>
<xsl:if test="$dvt_1_automode = '1'" ddwrt:cf_ignore="1">
<tr>
<td colspan="99" class="ms-vb">
<span ddwrt:amkeyfield="ID" ddwrt:amkeyvalue="ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(@ID))" ddwrt:ammode="view"></span>
</td>
</tr>
</xsl:if>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet> </Xsl>
<DataFields>
</DataFields>
<ParameterBindings>
<ParameterBinding Name="ListItemId" Location="QueryString(ID)" DefaultValue="0"/>
<ParameterBinding Name="weburl" Location="None" DefaultValue="http://sharepointdev:12341/sites/wiki1"/>
<ParameterBinding Name="ListID" Location="None" DefaultValue="{6A6ECE84-4D39-48E2-BD6A-C20B2AC6355B}"/>
<ParameterBinding Name="dvt_apos" Location="Postback;Connection"/>
<ParameterBinding Name="ManualRefresh" Location="WPProperty[ManualRefresh]"/>
<ParameterBinding Name="UserID" Location="CAMLVariable" DefaultValue="CurrentUserName"/>
<ParameterBinding Name="Today" Location="CAMLVariable" DefaultValue="CurrentDate"/>
</ParameterBindings>
</WebPartPages:DataFormWebPart>
</ZoneTemplate></WebPartPages:WebPartZone>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<SharePoint:UIVersionedContent UIVersion="4" runat="server">
<ContentTemplate>
</div>
</ContentTemplate>
</SharePoint:UIVersionedContent>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderAdditionalPageHead" runat="server">
<SharePoint:DelegateControl runat="server" ControlId="FormCustomRedirectControl" AllowMultipleControls="true"/>
<SharePoint:UIVersionedContent UIVersion="4" runat="server"><ContentTemplate>
<SharePoint:CssRegistration Name="forms.css" runat="server"/>
</ContentTemplate></SharePoint:UIVersionedContent>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderTitleLeftBorder" runat="server">
<table cellpadding="0" height="100%" width="100%" cellspacing="0">
<tr><td class="ms-areaseparatorleft"><img src="/_layouts/15/images/blank.gif?rev=23" width='1' height='1' alt="" /></td></tr>
</table>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderTitleAreaClass" runat="server">
<script type="text/javascript" id="onetidPageTitleAreaFrameScript">
if (document.getElementById("onetidPageTitleAreaFrame") != null)
document.getElementById("onetidPageTitleAreaFrame").className="ms-areaseparator";
</script>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderBodyAreaClass" runat="server">
<SharePoint:StyleBlock runat="server">
.ms-bodyareaframe {
padding: 8px;
border: none;
</SharePoint:StyleBlock>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderBodyLeftBorder" runat="server">
<div class='ms-areaseparatorleft'><img src="/_layouts/15/images/blank.gif?rev=23" width='8' height='100%' alt="" /></div>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderTitleRightMargin" runat="server">
<div class='ms-areaseparatorright'><img src="/_layouts/15/images/blank.gif?rev=23" width='8' height='100%' alt="" /></div>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderBodyRightMargin" runat="server">
<div class='ms-areaseparatorright'><img src="/_layouts/15/images/blank.gif?rev=23" width='8' height='100%' alt="" /></div>
</asp:Content>
<asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderId="PlaceHolderTitleAreaSeparator" runat="server"/>
so from the above markup the name field is not part of the edit form,, i think this is because the Name is part of the Document content type and not part of the enterprisewiki content type .. so is there a way to add the name field to the edit
form ?.
second question, the edit form will show all the content type fields such as ; standard, document type, department , title (display in search), etc so what is the best way to remove these fields from the custom edit form ?

Hello John,
This can only be done by adding VBScript to the form. It would basically be:
Sub Item_Open()
Item.GetInspector.SetCurrentFormPage "P.2"
End Sub
... where "P.2" would be what you named the page you want to display first.

Creating a Search form for Captivate courses

I've been asked to create a search form for our online courses. We do not use the TOC in our courses so the Find field in the TOC is not an option. Here are the ideas I've had so far:
a Javascript-powered form search
a search form widget
a Google search embedded into the surrounding HTML page (But I don't think that Google can "see" text inside the Captivate SWF object...)
Right now, we are using Captivate 5.5, but do plan to move to Captivate 6.0 fairly soon. I'm grateful for any ideas.
Thanks!
Peter

You're hitting a bug. See ADF Faces Classical Search Form works only with Entity base VO in JDev 11? for a workaround suggestion.

Is there a way to have a search form for the CRM database?

I know there is a search form provided for the Web Apps. I can't seem to find how to create a search form for the CRM database. I have created a membership site, and also extended the CRM database with additional fields. I would like the users to be able to search on selected fields in the CRM database including the extended database fields. For example, I have a field called membership type in the extended database. I would like to be able to search on that in a search form. Is that possible?
Thanks

Sidney,
Your input is very helpful to put me on the track to find a workaround. As I tried using Web App approach, I get into a road block that hopefully you can help throw some light on.
This my scenerio: I created a Web App for holding the profile fields (called it Profile). I created a Page to display the Customer record (Names, usernames, email, etc, and I would also want to display the fields from the Profile Web App. I am at lost how to do that. Seems like I can only insert the web item list in that page but I actually want to display the Detall Layout instead of the List layout. To display the Detail Layout, I need to first manually choose the item before it will direct me to the Detail layout. I am trying to find a way to do this automatically based on the fact I have only one Profile web app item for each customer.
The question is whether there is a way to pull up a specific Profile web app item based on the customer's id or something that link the two together, using javascript or whatever method. Is there a tag to gives me the customer record id? If I can get that id, I could insert that id into one of the fields in the Profile Web App during creation of profile. Perhaps I can then pull up the profile item based on this id.
Thanks for all the help
Steve

Need to attach my custom search form to the tourch in the application

Hi all ,
plz will you guide me in the case i've customized search form & i need to attach it to the search torch found in the application ,
where when the user press this tourch my search form appears

yes in the application for example
human resources vision operations -------> people------> enter & maintain
it shows find screen then when i finish the find screen it send me to the main form , then while i'm in the main form there is torch found in the application under the menu word on the upper left where it brings the find screen again
wht i want that i need to attach my custom find screen to this torch
will you tell me is wht i need related to here or else where can i post my question ???

Hi. After I have loaded a picture into Photoshop some of the menu tools are greyed out and I cannot use the keyboard short cut, for instance I cannot use Ctrl T to enter free transform mode. Also the toolbar is so small I cannot see the icons without ge

Hi. After loading a picture into Photoshop some of the menu tools are greyed out and I cannot use the keyboard short cuts, for instance I cannot use Ctrl + T for free transform, how do I resolve this problem. In addition the tool Icons are so small I have to get close to the screen to see them, is there anyway the Icons can be made bigger without reducing the resolution of the screen.
Thanks
Derek

Are you working on a background layer? If so, Ctrl + T will not work. Press Alt and double-click your background layer to convert to a normal layer (or right-click BG layer and select Layer from Background) and try again.
If you're working in Photoshop CC 2014 you can go to Preferences > Experimental Features and tick "Scale UI 200% for high-density displays" to make your buttons and icons larger.

APP-PAY-06041: you cannot use the enter resource form because human resource is fully installed. Instead use the Human resource people form

hi
i'm getting this error when i'm creating in projects implementation superuser HR foundation - Enter AND maintain
APP-PAY-06041: you cannot use the enter resource form because human resource is fully installed. Instead use the Human resource people form
PLEASE HELP
Thanks
Regards
vijay

Did you check metalink -
PERWSEMP When Creating new Employee Using HR Foundation, APP-PAY-06041: You Cannot use the Enter Person Form Because Human Resources is Fully Installed (Doc ID 353323.1)

I use the google search bar for everything and since downloading FF4 i can not select any of the suggestions in the google drop down menu

I use the google search bar for everything and since downloading FF4 i can not select any of the suggestions in the google drop down menu.
I have tried to select one of the suggestions that google give me for my search but FF it wont let me. I have type everything out in full. I hate FF4 it is rubbish. I loved firefox before this one came out but now I am seriously thinking of going over to google chrome.

Many thanks for the prompt reply, ideato.
One of the reasons I abandoned Chrome in favour of Firefox was due to the "black band of doom" that appears on the top of the Google page - so setting up my homepage to google.co.uk just puts that back in the ugly spotlight.
I was, though, pleasantly surprised to see a Google search bar on the Mozilla Firefox Start Page (without the black band and Google options that I am just not interested in) but bitterly disappointed that it is Google.fr (due to my ISP being French).
I shall learn to live with Yahoo (or worse case scenario, Bing!)
rgds, PG

WHY - give workable examples of using JHeadstart to convert forms into ADF.

Why give examples of how to use JHeadStart to convert forms in to ADF, but not allow it to be done with the evaluation version ... I assume it was possible with the 10g versions. Is it broken in 11g.
I was lookig to build a case for migrating an oracle forms application to Oracle Java and not a IBM or JBOSS or even .Net application, I can't build that case now, I have no budget to engage Oracle, have to do this of my own bat. Company has been take over by bigger company that has IBM stack.
Is Oracle this follish to allow the smaller users of Oralce to go by the way side, be lost to other languages etc

We deliberately did not include the Forms2ADFGenerator in the evaluation version.
Modernizing your forms application, possibly migrating it to ADF is a considerable effort that is often underestimated.
Migration tools like the Forms2ADFGenerator can help to a certain extent but are by no means a magic bullet. This is something we cannot stress enough, as over and over again we see people who think migration tools can make the difference. They cannot.
If you want to make a choice of development environment to modernize your forms application, then the availability of a migration tool should not play a role!
It is a fundamental and strategic decision to go for Oracle ADF which should not be influenced by a minor time saver like a migration tool.
To decide on the use of JHeadstart, the evaluation version with the tutorial should be convincing enough.
The real power of Jheadstart is not in the Forms2ADF Generator, this tool is just a lbonus that can save you a bit of time.
Here is some more info:
When does JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator save time
The amount of work that can be saved by using the JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator (JFG) very much depends on the structure of the Oracle Forms application at hand. The JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator provides most savings for forms that have the following characteristics:
* Standard-Forms data retrieval and data manipulation through blocks based on database tables, with master-detail relations defined between the block
* Complex user interface, many (stacked) canvasses, many tabs, many list of values, and other display types
* PL/SQL logic mostly limited to user interface dynamics: conditionally showing/hiding user interface items, and conditionally changing the properties of user interface items. While JHeadstart does not convert PL/SQL logic, this type of logic is easily implemented in the ADF application because JHeadstart provides many declarative property settings to implement this behavior.
PL.SQL Logic
JHeadstart has made the deliberate choice to not automatically convert the PL/SQL logic to Java. The reasons for this are:
* It is impossible to automate the migration of a two-tier architecture (logic in Forms or in the database) to a three tier Model-View-Controller architecture as is common in JEE web applications, including ADF-based applications.
* The architecture of the converted application should be identical to the best-practice architecture of an ADF application that is build from scratch. If the architecture is the same, the same skill set can be used to maintain both migrated applications and ADF applications build from scratch. In addition, by going for a best practice architecture, the application is more flexible, and can be maintained easier at lower cost.
* When using the JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator, you get this best-practice ADF architecture that is identical to ADF/JHeadstart applications that are built from scratch.
Other Forms2ADF Considerations
And even if it turns out the JFG adds a lot of value, there are many other questions you should ask yourself before embarking on a Foms2ADF project.
For example:
* Apart from technical reasons like old Forms verisons no longer supported, are there real business reasons and business benefits for migrating that justify the migration effort?
* To what extent is the application still meeting functional requirements?
* Are there issues with stability and end user friendliness?
* Old forms applications are typical "window-on-data" screens, you see the structure of the datamodel through the layout of the screens. Modern web 2.0 composite applications are more task-oriented with good support for human workflow. You should consider to what extent it wants to leverage all these new user interfaces capabilities that come with ADF Faces and WebCenter.
* How does the application fits in the overall IT landscape? What interfaces to other systems exist, what (old/obsolete?) technology is used to implement those interfaces?
* What about batch functionality and reporting facilities?
* May be part of the functionality of the current system can be replaced with standard off-the-shelf software?
* How sound, well structured and future proof is the underlying datamodel?
* To what extent are you looking at service-orientated architectures? Whats the SOA maturity level of your organisation?
* Above questions help to answer the key question: how desirable and benficial is it to migrate an old monolitic forms application 1:1 to a monolitic ADF aplication? How does that fit in overall IT strategy?
* Organisational isues: who will migrate the system, who will maintain the system? Is outsourcing considered? etc.
Next Steps
We offer a Forms2ADF assessment service in which we migrate a number of sample forms selected by the customer to assess the added value of the JFG, and we discuss all of the above questions
For example, I did one Forms2ADF assessment where it turned out that JFG added litlle or no value, but we were still able to convince the customer of the combined power of ADF and JHeadstart in (re-)building ADF apps from scratch.
You also might want to take a look at some presentations I did on this topic, and some online demo's:
* Guidelines for moving from Oracle Forms to Oracle ADF and SOA: http://www.slideshare.net/stevendavelaar/forms2-adfsoa-ukoug
* JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator – Migrating from Oracle Forms to a Best-Practice ADF application: http://www.slideshare.net/stevendavelaar/jhs11-forms2-adfukoug
* 3 online demo's of forms2adf conversion process: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/jheadstart/overview/index.html
Hope this helps,
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Custom search form and custom results

Hi, everyone!
My problem is that I have to search for custom items with custom fields (attributes). So I have to create my own search form with necessary fields. Than the solution may be to call the portal30.wwsbr_search_api.submit_search procedure, but it renders it's own HTML result with advanced search form. That doesn't suit me. Searching for alternative API, I found portal30.wwv_searchdb.search function. I tried to use it, but in any case it fails with exception and error message "ORA-01403: no data found". From the previous messages I've discovered that there is custom search portlet in 9.0.2. But is it possible to solve my problem without these new features?
Thank you for your answers ;)
yk
P.S. Sorry for my English...

Yuriy,
I'm sorry but the portal30.wwv_searchdb.search api is not one of the public apis. There is no simple out of the box way to address your issue with release 1 of Oracle9iAS Portal (you'll have to wait for release 2 for that), but you could do some post processing of the HTML that gets returned from the search results screen and present that to your users. While it would take a little work it would probably give you the functionality you desire.
You would create a custom search screen, and have the submission call our api with the users values. Then process the results of that call (an HTML page) inside a procedure to finally present your own view of the data.
Good luck,
Rich

Doubt in WebStyle search form in ADF

Hi,
I do have a search form as in the following url.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/tips/muench/screencasts/threesearchpages/threesearchforms_partone.html?_template=/ocom/technology/content/print
The 'SearchView' has three entity objects in it. One entity is the main table with a primary key. And the other two has the foreign key of the main table and it has multiple records for the same primary key of the main table. So now if I drag and drop this 'SearchView' as a adf search form, the result shows multiple results for the same primary key of the main table as it has multiple occurence in the other two tables.
So in this scenario, is it possible for me to display the results only from the main table? That is I want to see only one result for the primary key. But at the same time I need other entity objects also in the search view.
Or can you suggest me any other way to do this? Please help me.
Thanks,
Priya.S

Jan and Steve,
Thanks so much for the reply. But I am still confused with my case.
There are three entities.
1. Bill info (All main info with a request Id as a primary key, with the final status )
2. Bill status history (Different status history for the same request id)
3. Bill items (Different items to be billed for the same request id)
My requirement is that I need to have a search page to find the requests using the request id and other criteria. The result(billInfoviewresult) is a adf table with the request ids which is given with a command link. So using the link, I can navigate to the actual request. This result page should have all the above three entities. i.e. a read and write table for the item entity with the old values and a adf creation form for the 'Status history' so that the user can change the status (the status should be inserted as a new row. The DB should have all the status history from 'new' to 'completed').Everything should be for that particular request id.
I had a viewobject only for the bill info entity so that the result was a single occurence for a requestid. But I find difficulty in creating a status and item table as it always points to the first record in the data base. And when I manually change the data to set to this particular request, I do get null values. Because of this I wanted to add all these entities into a single viewobject. But getting multiple occurence for the same id in the result.
Can you please give me any suggestion in building the correct viewobject to acheive this?
Thanks,
Priya

Reg - Search Form for a VO with group by clause

Hi,
I have a Bar graph that displays data based on the Query below.
SELECT STATUS.STATUS_ID AS STATUSID,STATUS.STATUS,COUNT(SR.SERVICEREQUEST_ID) AS SRCOUNT
FROM SERVICE_REQUEST SR ,SERVICEREQUESTSTATUS STATUS
WHERE SR.STATUS_ID = STATUS.STATUS_ID
GROUP BY STATUS.STATUS_ID,STATUS.STATUS,SR.STATUS_ID
It displays the count of SRs against a particular status.
Now I need to add a search form to this graph with customer and date range.
So we need to add the line below to the where clause.
"SR.CUSTOMER_ID = :customerId AND SR.REQUESTED_ON BETWEEN :fromDate and :toDate"
But the columns SR.CUSTOMER_ID, SR.REQUESTED_ON also need to be added to the select clause to create the View criteria for search panel.
The two columns should also need to be added to the group by clause if we are to add them in the select clause.
This would not produce the expected results.
How do I create a search form with the criterias applied only at the where clause.Please help.
With Regards,
Guna

The [url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16162_01/apirefs.1112/e17483/oracle/jbo/server/ViewObjectImpl.html]ViewObjectImpl has methods for doing this programmatically (setQuery, defineNamedWhereClauseParam, setNamedWhereClauseParam) that you can use to manipulate the query, the bind variables expected, and the values for the binds.
John

New custom search criteria for opportunities

Hi to all,
I want to expand the web gui view for search opportunities.
I have a new custom filed in the heder of the
opportunities named ZZORDERADM_H010, type BOOL, created with transaction EEWB.
The header is correctly update, the table CRMD_ORDERADM_H now contain my custom filed and it works fine
if i set it from web GUI (i've also extend the hedere view with the custom field).
Now want be able to use it as search criteria.
I follow the note nr 1336833.
I have extended the structure CRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL (and the struct CRMST_QUERY_OPP_AC_BTIL also )
with my new custom filed (i've made an append).
Then I mantain the table CRMVC_DQ form sm34.
I've made a new insertion under component BTopp like this:
BT BTQOpp ZZORDERADM_H0101 X Indica opzioni che sono disponibili ........................
The custom filed for search is now available, and i've extend the search view of WEB GUI with the new custom filed.
BUT the search DON'T WORK. Is like the the new custom field not influence the search!!!
With all the other search criteria blank, and mine valorized, the search returns all the opportunity entries;
instead it should return 2 records (i've made 2 test case with this custom fileld set at 'X'.)
The same result trying execute the query from transaction GENIL_BOL_BROWSER.
Please Help!
Davide

Hello Davide,
If you want to use your new field in search, a BADI should be implemented. This is usually done for you by EEWB provided that you checked "PCUI extended search" at some point in the wizard. SAP should have changed this label because it is somehow confusing if your are using CRM5.2 onward versions... as PCUI has nothing to do with it!
So did you mark this checkbox?
If no, you can run the wizard again and everything will be fine.
Kind regards,
Nicolas Busson.
PS: badi name is CRM_RF_SEARCH_EEW

CANNOT USE "Advanced Custom Search Form For ADF"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for