Cenvatable BED & ECS not getting picked up in transaction ;J1IEX

Hi,
While capturing excise invoice for GR the Cenvatable BED and ECS percentage and value is not picked up automatically. Only the non-deductible CST value is shown.The Excise base amount is also appearing.
There are two errors:
1. Quantity could not be converted from NOS to "Message no. V1297".
2. PLA-AT2 amount 24.02.2007 is greater than available amount. "Message no. 8I659"
All relevant CIN masters are maintained.The base UOM in Material master is given in NOS (numbers).
Can anybody help me urgently?
Regards
Saikat Halder

Biswait,
Thanks for your reply.
I have maintained the Excise defaults in CIN customisation for our condition based tax procedure TSILTX. Under "A/P BED Cond." I have maintained JMOP condition type (Cenvatable) and under "ECS AP" I have maintained JECP condition type (Cenvatable).
The Education Cess (JECP) value is coming while I am doing Part-I during GR transaction (MIGO), but the BED value is still not appearing.
The help option on the field "A/P BED Cond." in SAP ECC6.0 says "Condition Type defined in Tax Procedure TAXINJ for Basix Excise Duty on Accounts Payable." . Shall this JMOP condition type work for here ?
Regards
Saikat Halder

Similar Messages

GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up

If we have creating a PO without checking "GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up, due to this we are not able to create MIRO document with Excise duty value.
We are using Tax calculation procedure TAXINN.
Regards,
Rama Mohan

Hi,
Check in the following path :
Material Management > Purchase Order > Define screen layout at document level
Choose ME21N for details and check by double clicking the GR/IR control whether GR based invoice verification
is an optional entry.
Regards,
Sadashivan

Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO

Dear Experts,
I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
Kindly resolve the issue.
Satish

S0004830404 wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
> I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
> I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
>
> Kindly resolve the issue.
>
> Satish
hi,
use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
Thanking you

Index is not getting picked even after providing hint

Hi All
The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
select * from
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
      to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
      t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
UNION ALL
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
     to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
    t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
                      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
sho parameter cursor_sharing
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
SQL> sho parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16
SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACTExplain plan
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   984 | 29686   (1)| 00:05:57 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26870   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26866   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24327   (1)| 00:04:52 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2539   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 18 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 19 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 26568 |   315K (1)| 01:03:10 |
| 20 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 21 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 23 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 24 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 25 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19258   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 26 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 27 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 28 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:45 |
| 29 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 30 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 31 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 32 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 33 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   848 | 26900   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26898   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26894   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24352   (1)| 00:04:53 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2542   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 22896 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 22 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 23 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 25 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 26 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 27 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19269   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 28 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 29 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 30 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:47 |
| 31 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 32 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 33 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 34 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 35 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 37 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
Thanks
GV

riedelme wrote:
My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
2 from dual connect by level <= 50000;
50000 rows created.
SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select max(c) from t where n =1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2966233522
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 | 1004 | 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 50000 |    47M| 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
   2 - filter("N"=1)
14 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select /*+ index (t t_ix) */ max(c) from t where n = 1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3231292748
| Id | Operation                    | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |      |     1 | 1004 | 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE              |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T    | 50000 |    47M| 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T_IX | 50000 |       |    98   (0)| 00:00:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("N"=1)
15 rows selected.

GL Account is not getting picked by billing document

Hi Gurus,
one new GL account is set up by our FI team for a accrual condition type.
case 1:
Now when i have cancelled the previous created billing doc and trying to create again then the new GL account is not getting picked.
case 2:
Whereas when am doing the complete process flow like sales order creation, delivery and billing then the new GL account is getting picked.
Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this, why its not getting picked in first case.
Thanks,
Ashi

Hello Preety,
Unless you see the Revenue Account Determination Analysis for the Billing document, it is very difficult to understand the reason. Please click on the Environment >> Acc.Determination Analysis >> Revenue account in the VF03 screen and find the missing assignment.
Thanks,
Suman$

File not getting picked with Sender Adapter

Hello Experts,
i have configured file sender adapter which is polling configured directory every 60 sec. But i could see file not getting picked up. when looked into Communication channel monitoring i could see following error:
Putting message into send queue failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DuplicateMessageException : Message ID aa2ec9a0-44b3-11dc-9c5b-0003baa19669(OUTBOUND) already exists in database: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SAPDX1DB.SYS_C00120924) violated.
is this due to adapter cache. we are on SP20.
has anybody faced this problem earlier?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Rajeev

Hello
actually there was small problem in file generation and hence it was failing in message mapping which is resolved. but still that problem is there when it is attempting to delete the file. hence it is not able to delete that file.
can we manually clear the send queues or should we refresh CPA cache?
Thanks
Rajeev

Output Message Type MAHN not getting picked up in PO

Hello Experts
   I have configured customized output type ZMAH (similar to MAHN) for reminder process. When I am creating PO this output type is not getting picked up automatically. If I am maintaining it manually I am able to send message for ME9F (Purchase Order) and ME91F (Reminder) successfully. Upon deremination analysis I am getting this message 502 " Output ignored (requirement 103 not fulfilled) ". Reminder are getting picked up from Purchase Value Key to PO.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Ankit

Hello Tej
I have maintained output device but same result.
Here I am listing all parameters that I have used for configuration can anyone please take a look and let me know if I am missing anything
Steps for new Message Type for PO Reminder (ZMAH)
1.     Defined new Table 026 Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
                                                    (ii) 027 Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
2.     Defined new access sequence Z515 Access Sequence for Archiving.
Following are parameters to the Access Sequence
Access Sequence Number = 1
Table = 026
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
Access Sequence Number = 2
Table = 027
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
3.     Maintain Output Type ZMAH for PO
General Data
Access Sequence = Z515
Access to condition (Checked)
Multiple Issuing (Checked)
Change Output
Program = SAPFM06P
FORM Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Replacement of Text Symbol
Program = SAPMM06E
FORM Routine = TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE
Default Values
Dispatch Time = Send Immediately (when saving application)
Transmission Medium = External Send
Communication Strategy = 0001 (E-mail Document)
Processing Routines
Transmission Medium = 5 (External Send)
Program = SAPFM06P
Form Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Form = MEDRUCK
Partner Roles
Medium = External Send
Funct = VN
Name = Vendor
4.     Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
Oprat. = 3
CType = ZMAH
Name = Output for Reminder
Short Text = Urging letter (expediter)/reminder
Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
5.     Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1 (Purchase Order)
Step = 101
Cntr = 3
CTyp = ZMAH
Description = Output for Reminder
Requirement = 103
6.     Assign Schema to Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1
7.     Define Partner Roles for Purchase Order
Out. = ZMAH
Med = 5 (External Send)
Funct = VN
Name = Output for Reminder
Name = Vendor
8.     Test Condition Maintained in MN04 (Master Data)
Purch. Org. = 0001
Vendor = 101281
Partner Funct = VN
Medium = 5 (External Send)
Date/Time = 4 Send immediately (when saving application)
Output Device = LP01
Cover Page Text = Reminder PO number &EKKO-EBELN&
Also I have configured Purchasing Value Key, reminders are coming to PO correctly.
Thanks
Ankit

Debit Items not getting picked while making payment with F110

HI,
When making payment with F110, items with Debit balance is not getting picked.
Example:
Payment method is assigned in the Maser data.
For a particular vendor one item has a credit balance- posting key 31.
We have posted another JV with F-02 and debited that vendor with Posting key 21. (Payment Method is not entered in the line item)
When we run F110 the credit balance is picked and debit balance is being shown in exception list.
When we got to FB02 and insert payment method in debit line item and then again run the F110 then system pickes all line items and pays the net amount.
The question is why system is not considering Payment Method from Master Data in debit line item, while in credit line item it is picking payment method from the master data.
Do I need to do any setting for it so that it should automatically take payment method from master data even in case of Debit line items.
Regards
Sanjay

Hi All,
Thanks for your quick replies.
But it does not solve my problem.
When I am not assigning any payment method to either Debit or credit line items, system picks (payment method from Master data) for only credit line items and ignores debit line items.
But the problem is that when I assign payment method to debit line item (which is similar to what has been assigned to vendor Master Data) system groups both debit and credit line items and makes payment of only net amount.
My question was why system considered the debit line item for making payment if I manually enter payment method in the line item, if system has been designed only for out going payment. In my opinion It should have reacted similarly irrespective of whether payment method entered in the line item or not.
Regards
Sanjay

Items not getting picked up in Return sales order

Dear all,
I am creating a return sales order with reference to a sales order.
In my delivery doc the items can be categorised into 3 types:
1- Picking done; Movement type determined
2- Picking done; Movement type not determined
3- Picking not-done; Movement type determined
In the return order, only the items of 1st type are coming. Why others not getting picked up? Can they be entered manually?
regards
Sapshed

Dear Hrishikesh,
Thats Ok. Picking is done only for those items for which Relevant for Picking is ticked.
What I want to know is that, for items that have either their picking not done or Goods movement not determined, they are not getting automatically picked up while I create a Return order w/r to a sales order.
thanks
Sapshed

File to File (file not getting picked)

Hi ,
I am having a file to file scenario. My file is not getting processed from the source directory. When i check in the communication channel monitoring bith my sender and rcvr communication chanels are wrking fine.
I have placed the source file with the name mentioned in the sender communciation channel.The processing mode is Archive.
My file Name is Actual_Labour_Cost.NE*.txt in Sender cc.
so i placed the file With Actual_Labour_Cost.NE.
Kindly suggest.
Regards
Sai

Hi,
If you have using thec orrect file name and extesnsion in the comms channel and still the file is not getting picked up then Could you check the file permission/authorizatios for the XI user you are using in XI to pick up the file from the source directory ?
The file should at least have the permissions to Read/Write.
Regards,
Vishal

File not getting picked by File CC

Hi Experts,
Q1)An issue in files not getting picked up by communication channel in an inbound scenario R/3<XI<-File Port
Retry interval started. Length: 120.0 seconds
7/24/09 1:33:14 PM   Error occurred while connecting to the FTP server "XXX.XXX.XX.webdti.com:21": java.net.SocketException: Connection timed out:could be due to invalid address
7/24/09 1:32:00 PM   Processing started
Any Quick helps highly appreciated.
Q2)How can i restart an file adapter?
Thanks,
Sudhansu

Hi Sudhanshu,
   Regarding your first question, check if you are able to access the file port manually typing the ftp address in internet explorer or any browser.
Regarding your Q2, read this:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/1b/d5ef3b1ad56d4fe10000000a114084/content.htm
(CTRL+F for "To restart the adapter")
Regards,
Ravi

CLASSPATH not getting picked up for MWA

Hi All,
Oracle Database 11g R 11.1.0.7.0
Oracle Applications R 12.1.1
O/S:Linux
CLASSPATH not getting picked up for MWA.My classes are lying under $JAVA_TOP/xyz. However my suspicion is that the jvm that deals with MWA is not looking at the classpath above.
I checked the CLASSPATH from forms using the block $ENVIRONMENT$ and it is looking at:
/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/repository.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ldapjclnt10.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/debugger.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/share.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/utj.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/zrclient.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/reports/jlib/rwrun.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmwebutil.jar
This clearly does not have $JAVA_TOP/xyz under it.
Could anyone please let us know what needs to be done and where the classes need to be placed?
Thanks for your time!
Regards,

Hi,
Did the above steps but still CLASPATH is somehow not getting picked up for MWA.
$ env|grep CLASSPATH
REPORTS_CLASSPATH=/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/reports/jlib/rwbuilder.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/reports/jlib/rwrun.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/zrclient.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/home/oc4j.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/home/lib/ojsp.jar
AF_CLASSPATH=/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg2.zip:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes
CLASSPATH=/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg.zip:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmall.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/xxx
$ echo $CLASSPATH
/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/dt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/lib/tools.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/lib/appsborg.zip:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/forms/java/frmall.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/jlib/ewt3.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/j2ee/OC4J_BI_Forms/applications/formsapp/formsweb/WEB-INF/lib/frmsrv.jar:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes:/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/xxx
System is expecting file at default $JAVA_TOP/oracle/apps/wms/td/server location
/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/oracle/apps/wms/td/server
$ ls -l XxgilTaskSignonFunction*
ls: XxgilTaskSignonFunction*: No such file or directory
where user's have file at $JAVA_TOP/xxx/oracle/apps/wms/td/server location.
/<instance_name>/<instance_name>/apps/apps_st/comn/java/classes/xxx/oracle/apps/wms/td/server
$ ls
XxgilMainPickFListener.class XxgilMainPickPage.class XxgilManifestPickFListener.class XxgilManifestPickPage.class XxgilTaskSignonFunction.class
Not sure what changes to make to fix this.
Any suggestions please.
Thanks,

Files not getting picked from the FTP site

Dear All,
We are having one File-XI-RFC scenario running in XI-PRD Server. Sometimes what happens is that files available in the FTP site are not getting picked by the File adapter. I have checked in the adapter monitoring and communication channel is active there. Also, there are no errors regarding this in SXMB_MONI. I have configured alerts also but for this case no alerts are getting trigerred. And also when I am reactivating that particular communication channel then that file is getting picked instantaneously.
Can anybody please guide me on what might be the real cause for this as this error is happening randomly.
regards,
N.Jain.

HI,
Have you used per File transfer parameter in FTP Communication channel.
It makes the FTP adapter inactive in ideal time.
So add the poll interval may be for every 30 mins or something like it. It will forcefully activate the FTP port after every 30 mins. You may have the poll interval for every 1 min. Only the files to be picked up are getting logged in in XI monitoring.
So there will be no garbage collection of unwanted messages in Monitoring.
Thanks
Swarup

File not getting picked.

If a file is not getting picked
where can be issue...what is the first thing we should do....
what is the exact location we should go...
Harsha

Hi Harsha,
As your FTP is not picking up the file , you can please try out the following.
1. Kindly check whether you are able to ping your server.
2. Check whether you have correctly entered the name of your source folder in the sender communication channel.
3. Also confirm the name of the file you are trying to send is same as mentioned in the sender channel.
4. Check the user credentils ,i.e. you have entered the correct id and password in the sender communication channel.
5. Please check the permissions of the the source folder i.e. they should be "write / read " with read atleast.
If you are still facing the same problem ,kindly revert.
Kindly reward the points if you find this reply has helped you solve / analyzed your problem.
Regards,
Vishal

Force index not getting picked up while running the SQL Quer

Hi All,
We are facing an issue with one SQL Query. We have created a custom Index and we are using that index in our query by using the following syntax:
/*+INDEX(ol XXEXH_ORDER_LINES_N2)*/
Where
ol – Table Alias Name
XXEXH_ORDER_LINES_N2 – Index Name
But still the index is not getting picked up in the Explain Plan.
If any one of you have faced a similar issue then please let us know how you had resolved it.
Appreciate your help.
DB version:10.2.0.4
Apps version: 11.5.10.2.0
Regards,
Manpreet
Edited by: 876912 on Aug 3, 2011 2:49 AM

Hi;
For your issue i suggest close your thread here as changing thread status to answered and move it to Forum Home » Database or Forum Home » Database » SQL and PL/SQL which you can get more quick response
Regard
Helios

Cenvatable BED & ECS not getting picked up in transaction ;J1IEX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for