CFBundleVersion must be higher than previously uploaded version

I got this error and cannot figure out how to resolve it. In my info.plist file I set the Bundle version to 1.8. My current binary on the app store is 1.7 and yet when I try to validate in the Organizer, I get the error that the CFBundleVersion must be higher than the previously uploaded version. I tried changing the bundle version in Xcode and in parallel iTunes Connect to 1.9, to 2.0, to 1.80, to 2.01, to 2.8, and 3.8, but with no success. The new version of the app is currently waiting to upload.
Any ideas how I can get the app to validate properly in the Organizer. I have never had this problem before and it is very frustrating.

Dear xnav,
Thank you! I actually figured it out right after I posted and now it works just fine. My misunderstanding was that I was trying to send a past archive thinking this was the new archive. Thanks to you, I now understand this much better. Then my problem was that "Archive" was greyed out. All I needed to do, which you mention, is to select the build for an iOS Device rather than the simulator. Then "Archive" showed up in the menu and it worked just fine. I was able to archive the 1.8 version and upload it. Thank you for all of your help.

Similar Messages

When updating my legacy app to my native app I get the error that the "APK code version must be higher than 2000000" . I've specified in the builder that this would be 4.0.0.0

I've tried to update but I get that error. But the thing is that the version i´'m uploading is 4.0.0.0
Any help?Digital Publishing Suite

The version code needs be be much higher than 6. Make it 20000007 or something like that.
Digital Publishing Suite Help | Setting version numbers in Web DPS App Builder

Firefox 34.05 says plugin is out-of-date, insecure, and thus disabled. But...my version is higher than the blocked version

Upon updating to Firefox 34.05, I've been faced with the fact that this version of Firefox (erroneously) thinks some of my plugins are out of date, and has disabled them, for my safety.
For instance, it tells me that "Adobe Acrobat Reader is known to be vulnerable and must be updated". Upon clicking the link to update it, it informs me that "Adobe Reader 9.5.1 and lower has been blocked for your protection.". Okay, cool right? An update should solve that.
Problem is, I don't *have* a version of AR that is 9.5.1 or lower. My version is, according to Firefox itself, version 10.1.4.38. So why is it blocked? Updating the version, as advised in other threads on similar issues, does not seem to work. In fact, the Mozilla plugincheck tells me that my version is up-to-date and is fine.
It is very inconvenient to have to open an entirely different browser, like Opera, just to do certain things that I could previously do with Firefox.
I'd also like to voice my overall disapproval on the way many features of Firefox (enabling disabling Javascript, images, certain stylistic features, the add-on bar) have been done away with and users are being told "you can install an add-on to add that functionality back on". It has always been my understanding that the less add-ons installed the better, given that they are apparently the number one problem when it comes to Firefox having issues. Having to disable 5 new add-ons anytime I want to troubleshoot a problem is not convenient, and makes locating the source of various problems more difficult.
I have no idea why Mozilla is so committed to making changes that users hate, and act as if having third-party add-ons to restore functionality is any kind of solution.

''James [[#answer-672408|said]]''
<blockquote>
Firefox 34.0.5 is not doing the blocking as it is due to the blocklist. https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/blocked/
Adobe Reader '''10.0 to 10.1.5.*''' has been blocked for your protection.
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/blocked/p158 (Blocked on October 5, 2012)
You were looking at another blocklist page which was https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/blocked/p156 posted on same day.
The https://www.mozilla.org/plugincheck/ is not always accurate or reliable (needs to be manually updated) as Adobe has not been keeping the Adobe products versions to check for updated on that page as the recent Flash updates on December 9 has shown.
It is however accurate when it says versions in Plugins panel of Addons Manager is outdated.
There is Adobe Reader 11.0.10 though it seems like Adobe still provides 10.1.4 at http://get.adobe.com/reader/otherversions/ yet newer versions are at http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=10&platform=Windows
</blockquote>
James, why does the Firefox addon page link to the 9.5 "blocked for your protection" page instead of the 10.5 blocked page? Is that a mistake/failure to update on Adobe's part? That seems like something that should be controlled on the Mozilla side, since it has the 10.5 blocked page in existence as well. Should someone be notified that it's giving the wrong page to people?
The adobe update you linked to made it stop saying it's out of date, but what about the Java Development Toolkit? (As pictured in attached image #3). How should I go about getting that up to date?

Commitment limit must be higher that credit limit

Hi, everybody
I´ve been trying to load a Business Partenrs DTW template, but at the end some BP don´t upadate succesfully because the next message appears. "Commitment limit must be higher than credit limit".
This message appears too when you put a value in the credit limit field in the BO mster data and you put a value o zero in the Commitment limit.
Checking my BP configuration, I have in this moment customers who have credit limit values higher than the values to update, however in the template I didn´t find anty field related to OCRD.DebtLine that is the Commitement Limit field in order to update this field too.
Actually the data base haven´t any kind of transactions.
I will appreciate a lot you help.
Regards, Manuel

Hi Manuel,
Did you try to set the correct value in the DTW column "MaxCommitment"?
This is the DI API/DTW property that sets or returns the maximum allowed debt for payments from the business partner.
A good help for the DTW in general is the SDK Help Center delivered with the SDK Package in each patch or on the SDN Forum under the relevant Version. Example:
[SDK Help Center 2007|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9039f9c0-b9f1-2a10-27bd-b08d4bd9d48c]
You can search for the field you need to update (example: DebtLine) and find the relevant DI API Property (example: MaxCommitment) which tells you the correct column header.
Kind Regards,
Friederike Mundt
SAP Business One Forums Team

Google app renewed issue. Your APK's version code needs to be higher than 1000000

Hi
I am updating a previous AIr based Android app with a new version.
I had the following error
Your APK's version code needs to be higher than 1000000.
The issue is that I have carefully override the app version number but it keep given me this address.
Any clue?

ok, find the solution
I had to add several ZERO to the version number to be able to upload properly the APK

Firefox downloads previously downloaded versions of zipped files rather than current version.

On a website I manage, I downloaded a zipped MS Word file. After making changes to the file and uploading the modified file to my server, Firefox still downloads the old version of the zipped file. In fact, if I rename the file (so the link now points to a file that no longer exists on the server), the previously downloaded version of the file is STILL sent. I've used two methods (FireFTP and the server company's file manager) to rename the file, and the non-existent file is still sent.

I did reload the page (using all the methods you suggested), but still the old file. You mentioned bypassing the cache; is that something different than clearing the cache?
I don't think this is Firefox specific; the same thing is happening with IE. I'm also working with the server company to see if the problem is at their end.

Hi, I read all about my Mac book doesn't recognize my iPhone. I tried every advice, still it doesn't work. I have on MacBook the newest version of iTunes and work with iPhone 3 gs. The line says, you need iTunes higher than 10.6.3. It will not download.

Hi, my problem: my iphone3gs is not recognized by my MacBook, although I tried every single step you suggested. It happened only shortly, before it worked perfectly. What to do?

Your OS can not run iTunes higher than the version that you have now, thus no 10.6.3.

This bundle is invalid - New apps and app updates submitted to the App Store must be built with public (GM) versions of Xcode 5.1.1 or higher and iOS 7 SDK. Do not submit apps built with beta software

Does anyone can help me on this issue from Apple Developer?
This bundle is invalid - New apps and app updates submitted to the App Store must be built with public (GM) versions of Xcode 5.1.1 or higher and iOS 7 SDK. Do not submit apps built with beta software
Is there a new Flash CC - Adobe AIR SDK to solve this?
Best

Looks like there's some hope:
Re: App Store must be built with Xcode 5.1.1 or later !

Roll back when trying to install iTunes with the version higher than 10.5

I insall successfully with the iTunes with the version under 10.5. But my iPhone is not supported with those version. So I tried the new versions that are higher than 10.5 but a problem occurred during the installation.
"An error occurred during the installation of assembly 'Microsoft.VC80.CRT,type="Win32",version=8.0.50727.6195",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3 b9a1e18e3b",processorArchitecture="x86"'
Please refer to Help ans Support for more information. HRESULT:0x800736FD."
When I click OK, it rolls back. Then it started to run the rest apps of iTunes.
Anyone can help me, please!
Thank in advance!

Maybe no one can help!

HT1386 The version of my itunes is higher than the one u said i cant even find summary!

The version of my itunes is higher than the one u said i cant even find summary!

Check the appropriate link for assistance:
Mac > http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1591
PC > http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1538

Version Rman catalog higher than target database

Hi,
I have a database 10.1.0.2, but I couldn´t upgrade it to 10.1.0.3 or 10g R2 because this database is used by a application that needs this Oracle database version.
I have the catalog in another host with the same Oracle version, and I want to upgrade this database to 10.1.0.3 at least.
Is there any problem if I do the backups with a catalog with a version higher than the target database?
Thanks a lot.
Laura.

There should not be any problem in backup after upgrade of catalog database.
Cheers
Vignesh

Java Dispatcher not expected for versions higher than 7.10

Hi,
During the "Managed System configuration" in SAP Solution Manager 7.1, the "Check Prerequisites"-step abord with the following error:
The Managed System PIM~JAVA does not fulfill the Diagnostics Prerequisites
Details:
The definition of Technical System PIMJAVA is not correct: "PIMJAVA": Java Dispatcher "PIMJAVA784915620" not expected for versions higher than 7.10."
System PIM ist SAP NW 7.3.
Any ideas?
Many thanks in advance,
matthias

Hi Matthias,
Please review SAP Note 1571442 as it might be helpful in resolving this error message.

E540: All Bios versions higher than 1.61 have linux suspend bug.

All Bios versions higher than 1.61 have Linux suspend bug. 1.61 is the last Bios version, that was able to weakeup from suspend under Linux. This is a very common problem. It only works if USB3 is disabled. So this is pain, because I need both USB3 and suspend function.
It is defently a Bios bug see this:https:https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80351//bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80351
Is there anyway to get hands on the 1.61 Bios? Why can we not download it to fix this issue?
Please help.

If i could work out that i could address both CPUs once i ifx the bios then I would order a BIOS upgrade chip. But right now i would prefer not to spend additional money unless i have good confidence that this would be the case, especially as I understand the 550mhz unit is the fastest one that the board supports?

Why does LPX come with less impulse response files than previous versions?

Hello,
I recently upgraded to Logic Pro X from version 8. I installed Logic Pro X fresh as opposed to layering on more duplicate files that existed from previous Logic versions. When I noticed that my Logic projects kept turning up a warning indicating that impulse response files were missing, I discovered that Logic Pro X comes with far fewer impulse response files than Logic Pro 8 did. Is there a reason for omitting some of these files? I'm wondering if they were determined to be inferior compared to the files they decided to include with version X. Anyway, I can't shake this nagging curiosity. Does anyone have a skilled enough ear, or a deeper knowledge of impulse response files to know why that choice might have been made?
Thanks!

Okay, now that's really strange.
I'm in Canada and I'm using the newest version of iTunes.
All I'm doing is putting "annie lennox bare" in the search field in the way upper right corner of the store and I get a row of four identical entries.
I don't think it's a duplication error as the pictures are all different scans. The same cover but each one has a slightly different color or contrast, indicating a different scan source.
The first in the row has a release date of 06/02/03 ... the second of 06/10/03 ... the third 06/28/03 ... and the fourth 08/19/03.
Maybe one is a UK release, one is an Irish one, one is Canadian, and one American?? I'd have to dig up a history of the release dates in different countries to be sure. But surely only one is necessary on iTunes.
It's just confusing.

I am running OS X version 10.7.5 on a Macbook Air. I read in one thread where someone had an update that was higher than 10.7.5 but when I ask for updates, none are available. Is this the last update for OS X?

I am running OS X version 10.7.5 on a Macbook Air. I read in one thread where someone had an update that was higher than 10.7.5 but when I ask for updates, none are available. Is this the last update for OS X?

Niel, thanks for your response. I have been very wary of downloading Mavericks on this machine. I don't feel it has the power to run it and I'm afraid it was slow it down terribly. It was bought in late 2008. It's fine for my purposes at this time…just holding on until I buy a new one. I have the same problem others have with autofill not working, so I was trying to see if an update would help that situation. Grace

CFBundleVersion must be higher than previously uploaded version

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for