CFC9 setting: Cross-System Update Logic for Manufacturing Orders

Hi
Can someone explain the settings for this parameter? I could not figure out what should be the prefared setting?
Thanks

Hi,
This setting makes the decision on keeping the changes made in ECC and APO systems on the same time. For example, someone makes change in a particular planned order in ECC while someone else is changing the same order in APO. while saving, how the planned order should be updated, whether with the ECC changes or APO changes in both the systems is decided by this setting.
Preferred setting is based on your requirement. However most of the systems, I find it set as 2 - Use Update Logic, Automatic Retransfer. This confirms that ECC changes have the highest priority over APO changes.
Please refer the F1 help on that field.
Regards,
Manimaran M.

Similar Messages

Set Cross system company code

Does anybody know what is Set cross-system company code?
Regards,

Hi
This is more of ALE related. see below notes from SAP
===============================================
Cross-system company codes are used in the distribution in financial accounting. There is exactly one central system for each cross-system company code in the distributed environment. One company code has to be assigned to this cross-system company code on each system involved in the distribution.
When sending an IDoc with company code-dependent data, the company code is replaced with the cross-system company code in all company code fields. When receiving this kind of IDoc the reverse conversion takes place on the target system.
In this section you maintain the cross-system company codes and allocate them to the local company codes.
Recommendation
The use of cross-system company codes and business areas in distributed financial accounting is a provisional measure. SAP reserves the right to replace this in a future release with a tool that allows a conversion for all the organizational units of the SAP system.
Therefore SAP recommends that you choose consistent identifiers for the company code and the cross-system company code.
Activities
1. Create a cross-system company code.
2. Assign the cross-system company code to a chart of accounts to which it is also assigned on the central system.
This setting is needed on the decentral systems in order to determine the chart of accounts of the company code on the central system.
3. Assign cross-system company codes to the local company codes.
Specify the identifiers of the relevant cross-system company codes for each of the individual company codes.
========================================================
Thanks
Ashok - Assign points to say thanks

I cannot turn off the system update notification for my G2? I have already tried turning it off in Settings (under Applications Manager). What else can I try? Thanks

Dear All,
I have tried turning off the system update notifications for my G2 and have not been successful so far. I have already tried turning it off via Settings/Application Manager/All. What else can I try here? Thanks.
Regards,
Jeffrey Wong

Unfortunately that is not possible any longer. My advice is to take the update. You'll have to at some point or either you'll accidentally accept it. The HD voice and video works well between compatible phones. And, if you run into a problem, better now than later.

Order management header level updation process for iStore order.

Hi all,
I worked on OM header level updation process for iStore order.only card holder name,expiration date updated using OE_ORDER_PUB.process_order but Credit card number,card type not updated for istore order in OM.so please help to me.
CODE:
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
DECLARE
v_api_version_number NUMBER := 1;
v_return_status VARCHAR2 (2000);
v_msg_count NUMBER;
v_msg_data VARCHAR2 (2000);
-- IN Variables --
v_header_rec oe_order_pub.header_rec_type;
v_line_tbl oe_order_pub.line_tbl_type;
v_action_request_tbl oe_order_pub.request_tbl_type;
v_line_adj_tbl oe_order_pub.line_adj_tbl_type;
-- OUT Variables --
v_header_rec_out oe_order_pub.header_rec_type;
v_header_val_rec_out oe_order_pub.header_val_rec_type;
v_header_adj_tbl_out oe_order_pub.header_adj_tbl_type;
v_header_adj_val_tbl_out oe_order_pub.header_adj_val_tbl_type;
v_header_price_att_tbl_out oe_order_pub.header_price_att_tbl_type;
v_header_adj_att_tbl_out oe_order_pub.header_adj_att_tbl_type;
v_header_adj_assoc_tbl_out oe_order_pub.header_adj_assoc_tbl_type;
v_header_scredit_tbl_out oe_order_pub.header_scredit_tbl_type;
v_header_scredit_val_tbl_out oe_order_pub.header_scredit_val_tbl_type;
v_line_tbl_out oe_order_pub.line_tbl_type;
v_line_val_tbl_out oe_order_pub.line_val_tbl_type;
v_line_adj_tbl_out oe_order_pub.line_adj_tbl_type;
v_line_adj_val_tbl_out oe_order_pub.line_adj_val_tbl_type;
v_line_price_att_tbl_out oe_order_pub.line_price_att_tbl_type;
v_line_adj_att_tbl_out oe_order_pub.line_adj_att_tbl_type;
v_line_adj_assoc_tbl_out oe_order_pub.line_adj_assoc_tbl_type;
v_line_scredit_tbl_out oe_order_pub.line_scredit_tbl_type;
v_line_scredit_val_tbl_out oe_order_pub.line_scredit_val_tbl_type;
v_lot_serial_tbl_out oe_order_pub.lot_serial_tbl_type;
v_lot_serial_val_tbl_out oe_order_pub.lot_serial_val_tbl_type;
v_action_request_tbl_out oe_order_pub.request_tbl_type;
v_msg_index NUMBER;
v_data VARCHAR2 (2000);
v_loop_count NUMBER;
v_debug_file VARCHAR2 (200);
b_return_status VARCHAR2 (200);
b_msg_count NUMBER;
b_msg_data VARCHAR2 (2000);
BEGIN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Starting of script');
-- Setting the Enviroment --
mo_global.init('ONT');
fnd_global.apps_initialize ( user_id => 1013438
,resp_id => 21623
,resp_appl_id => 660);
mo_global.set_policy_context('S',204);
-- Header Record --
v_header_rec := oe_order_pub.g_miss_header_rec;
v_header_rec.request_date := SYSDATE;
v_header_rec.header_id := 251413;
v_header_rec.credit_card_holder_name :='esakki';
v_header_rec.credit_card_number := 'XXXXXXXXXXXX3510';
v_header_rec.credit_card_expiration_date := to_date('01-JAN-2014','dd-mon-yyyy');
v_header_rec.credit_card_code := 'MASTERCARD';
v_header_rec.payment_type_code := 'CREDIT_CARD';
v_header_rec.sold_to_org_id := 131747;
v_header_rec.sold_from_org_id := 204;
v_header_rec.ordered_date := SYSDATE;
v_header_rec.operation := OE_GLOBALS.G_OPR_UPDATE;
v_action_request_tbl (1) := oe_order_pub.g_miss_request_rec;
-- Line Record --
v_line_tbl (1) := oe_order_pub.g_miss_line_rec;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Starting of API');
-- Calling the API to update the header details of an existing Order --
OE_ORDER_PUB.PROCESS_ORDER (
p_org_id =>204
,p_operating_unit => NULL
p_api_version_number => v_api_version_number
,p_init_msg_list => fnd_api.g_false
,p_return_values => fnd_api.g_false
,p_action_commit => fnd_api.g_false
, p_header_rec => v_header_rec
, p_line_tbl => v_line_tbl
, p_action_request_tbl => v_action_request_tbl
, p_line_adj_tbl => v_line_adj_tbl
-- OUT variables
, x_header_rec => v_header_rec_out
, x_header_val_rec => v_header_val_rec_out
, x_header_adj_tbl => v_header_adj_tbl_out
, x_header_adj_val_tbl => v_header_adj_val_tbl_out
, x_header_price_att_tbl => v_header_price_att_tbl_out
, x_header_adj_att_tbl => v_header_adj_att_tbl_out
, x_header_adj_assoc_tbl => v_header_adj_assoc_tbl_out
, x_header_scredit_tbl => v_header_scredit_tbl_out
, x_header_scredit_val_tbl => v_header_scredit_val_tbl_out
, x_line_tbl => v_line_tbl_out
, x_line_val_tbl => v_line_val_tbl_out
, x_line_adj_tbl => v_line_adj_tbl_out
, x_line_adj_val_tbl => v_line_adj_val_tbl_out
, x_line_price_att_tbl => v_line_price_att_tbl_out
, x_line_adj_att_tbl => v_line_adj_att_tbl_out
, x_line_adj_assoc_tbl => v_line_adj_assoc_tbl_out
, x_line_scredit_tbl => v_line_scredit_tbl_out
, x_line_scredit_val_tbl => v_line_scredit_val_tbl_out
, x_lot_serial_tbl => v_lot_serial_tbl_out
, x_lot_serial_val_tbl => v_lot_serial_val_tbl_out
, x_action_request_tbl => v_action_request_tbl_out
, x_return_status => v_return_status
, x_msg_count => v_msg_count
, x_msg_data => v_msg_data
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Completion of API');
IF v_return_status = fnd_api.g_ret_sts_success THEN
COMMIT;
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('Order Header Updation Success : '||v_header_rec_out.header_id);
ELSE
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('Order Header Updation failed:'||v_msg_data);
ROLLBACK;
FOR i IN 1 .. v_msg_count
LOOP
v_msg_data := oe_msg_pub.get( p_msg_index => i, p_encoded => 'F');
dbms_output.put_line( i|| ') '|| v_msg_data);
END LOOP;
END IF;
END;
OUTPUT:
Starting of script
Starting of API
Completion of API
Order Header Updation Success : 251413
Thanks,
saran

Forgot to mention :Soruce is Oracle EBS

Cross System Lock using for roles?

Hi everybody,
maybe one of you can support me or have some experiences in case of using the Cross System Lock. We are checking the possibilty to implement the Cross System Lock (using in ChaRM, Scenario E (/TMWFLOW/Config_Lock).
First of all, we made a successful test in usage of table content.
Example:
You save a table modification in a Transport Request generated in ChaRM. Thus, the Transport Request is buffered in a Change Document. The result is that the table modification is locked in the object-monitor (/TMWFLOW/LOCKMON).
However, you save a role (pfcg) in a Transport Request generated in ChaRM the included objects in this role are not buffered in the object-monitor (/TMWFLOW/LOCKMON)
Thanks for your answers!
Best regards
Joachim Eichner

If you use the report TMW_TRKORR_LOCK_UPDATE against the role transport after saving your changes in it, this will register the role objects in the CSOL.
The Role transport tool does not automatically trigger the FM that registers the objects in the CSOL, just like manually adding objects to a transport doesn't trigger it. Therefore the workaround is to run this report. Only the transport owner is allowed to run TMW_TRKORR_LOCK_UPDATE.
In our experience it is not that CSOL does not support roles and authorizations; for the purpose of retrofit, it is able to detect conflicts reliably if the report is run consistently after saving role changes to transport. If no conflicts exists, auto-import works fine. If conflicts exist, then roles must be manually retrofitted.

System Update utilitiy for Windows XP 64

After installing the System Update , it is not working with Windows XP 64 and giving an error do we have a version for 64

Hello,
I don't believe that Lenovo ever shipped a T410 with Windows XP Professional 64-bit Edition, so you'll likely need to manually download device drivers for the various hardware components from the various silicon manufacturers' web sites (i.e., Intel, nVidia and so forth).
Regards,
Aryeh Goretsky
I am a volunteer and neither a Lenovo nor a Microsoft employee. • Dexter is a good dog • Dexter je dobrý pes
S230u (3347-4HU) • X220 (4286-CTO) • W510 (4318-CTO) • W530 (2441-4R3) • X100e (3508-CTO) • X120e (0596-CTO) • T61p (6459-CTO) • T43p (2678-H7U) • T42 (2378-R4U) • T23 (2648-LU7)
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

HOT TO SET THE OUT PUT MESSAGE FOR PURCHASE ORDER

As i was saving the Purchase order in Me21n the error message that came up was " NO OUTPUT MESSAGE SET FOR THE PO " HOW DO I SET THE OUTPUT MESSAGE AND SET THE PO PRINT SETTING KINDLY HELP.

Hi
First of all Execute program RSNAST0F in SA38 .
Following are some steps for PO message printing
Maintain Output of Purchase Order
1. Condition Table
SPRO  Material Management-> Purchasing -> Message -> Output Control->Condition Tables->Define Condition Table for Purchase Order
Select:
Purchasing Doc. Type,
Purch. Organization,
Vendor
2. Access Sequences
SPRO -> Material Management-> Purchasing -> Message -> Output Control->Access Sequences->Define Condition Table for Purchase Order
3. Message Type
SPRO -> Material Management-> Purchasing -> Message -> Output Control->Message Types->Define Message Type for Purchase Order
Ex:
EF---> ZNEU
Select ZNEU and double click on Mail title and texts and go to
EN- New Purchase Order Print Out,
Select ZNEU again and double click on Processing routines,
Select ZNEU again and double click on Partner Roles
4. Message Determination Schemas
4.1. Message Determination Schemas
SPRO -> Material Management-> Purchasing -> Message -> Output Control->Message Schema->Define Message Schema for Purchase Order-> Maintain Message Determination Schema
4.2. Assign Schema to Purchase Order
SPRO -> Material Management-> Purchasing -> Message -> Output Control->Message Schema->Define Message Schema for Purchase Order-> Assign Schema to Purchase Order
5. Partner Roles per Message Type
SPRO -> Material Management-> Purchasing -> Message -> Output Control-> Partner Roles per Message Type ->Define Partner Role for Purchase Order
6. Condition Record
Navigation Path: SAP Menu-> Logistics -> Material Management -> Purchasing-> Master data->Messages-> Purchase Order-> MN04-> Create
ZNEU -> ZNB
Now you create PO(ME21N) and maintain the text and save it. Go to ME22N and print the PO by giving output type ZNEU).
Vishal...

Pegging APO (Context for manufacturing order)

Hello,
Somebody knows a function (or BAPI) that reproduce the order context on APO? I only need to see the Pegged requirements (not all pegging structure). I have a manufacturing order and I need to see for what sales order I´m producing (I have production orders on the others steps).
Thanks,
Marcelo

Hi Marcelo,
I think you can do that with the following FM:
   CALL FUNCTION '/SAPAPO/OM_PEG_CAT_GET_ORDERS'
      EXPORTING
        is_gen_params             = ls_gen_params
        iv_simsession             = lv_simsession
        it_pegid                  = lt_pegid_char
        it_category               = lt_atpcat
        iv_start_time             = gv_start_tst
        iv_end_time               = gv_end_tst
        iv_ionode_peg_sel         = gc_io_peg_all_out
        iv_additional_sel_options = lv_sel_opt
      IMPORTING
        et_ordkeys                = lt_ordkey
        et_orders                 = lt_order
       et_inputs                 = lt_inputs
        et_outputs                = lt_outputs
       et_peg_inpnode            = lt_peg_inpnode
        et_peg_outnode            = lt_peg_outnode
      EXCEPTIONS
        lc_connect_failed         = 1
        lc_com_error              = 2
        lc_appl_error             = 3
        OTHERS                    = 4.
You have to select the orders by pegid, atpcat and time range. Also important is
the parameter "iv_ionode_peg_sel         = gc_io_peg_all_out". Then you get all pegging nodes for an order in the structures et_peg_inpnode and et_peg_outnode.
regards,
Claus

Is system update right for me?

I'm trying to determine whether I should now upgrade to a new system. I'm about to start editing an independent feature length film project in about a month. I'm switching to Adobe Premiere Pro CS6.
I currently have an 2 x 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon (Early 2008) Mac Pro with which I have been editing with Final Cut Pro 7 on.
I wasn't really wanting to move to a laptop - I was hoping for new iMacs at WWDC 2012.
Waiting any longer is not something I can do at this point if I'm going to start this new project on a new system. However, after looking at Geekbench numbers comparing my current MacPro setup to the 27" current iMacs, I'm not seeing a huge increase in the numbers. Is this a realistic way for me to look at this? Should I not bother upgrading at all? Are there big benefits that I would get that Geekbench isn't showing me?
One thing I do know is that my current MacPro processors do not support Hyper-Threading or Turboboost or anything like that. Also, my graphics card is lacking GPU acceleration that many new apps take advantage of. Would these items alone be enough to justify an update when using Premiere Pro CS6, Photoshop, and After Effects?
Thanks!

Do you really need a MAC or would a PC be OK?
If you need a MAC, look at the latest MAC Pro, fully loaded with dual hexa cores, 64 GB memory, etc. It comes to around € 11,000. You still need a MAC Quadro 4000 card, because that is not included in the price. It is not latest technology and is significantly slower than a modern PC, but downgrading to a very slow iMAC or MBP that do not meet practical minimum requirements is even worse, especially for a feature length film.
If you go to PC, you have far more options for far less $$$ and have much better performance. See http://www.adkvideoediting.com/
I am assuming you want to buy a complete system, but if you want to build yourself, look at
Adobe Forums: What PC to build? An update... and Adobe Forums: Planning / building a new system. Part 1

December System Update: Neglect for E-commerce payment gateway in Africa

Nice to know that Adobe BC is getting better day by day. However, what is the purpose of this improvements without support for more payment gateway e.g 2checkout. Africa especially my country- Nigeria is totally alienated regarding payment gateway support. We can't expand our client turnover because of this limitation or better still afraid to take on any Ecommerce projects
We'll suggest the team put in place a stop gap measure (in form of custom payment gateway) or improve support for payment gateway that can cover Africa.
Kind Regards
Bosun

Hello,
We do not have any short term plans to offer support for the 2checkout payment gateway. However, we do already have working integrations with several payment gateways that do offer support for Africa (InternetSecure, PayGate). Please check our payment gateway list for details: http://helpx.adobe.com/business-catalyst/kb/supported-payment-gateway-providers.html
Thank you again for your suggestion and we will keep you updated with any news about extended payment gateway support.
Kind regards,
Cristinel

System update available for AT300/305 Excite 10 (non- LE)

Check your Service Station. The link to the KB article--changelog?--is 404 so who knows what this update does. I'm hoping it improves stability if WiFi is set to sleep with the tablet. We'll see…

Yeah -- this update will mess up screen brightness if you are using the Balanced Power option.
Toshiba, please look into this issue.

ThinkVantage System Update Patch for Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 2

FYI:
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=MIGR-72758&selectarea=SUPPORT&tempsel...

Small warning: This too is contains a flaw and doesn't install on certain systems.
http://forums.lenovo.com/lnv/board/message?board.id=Special_Interest_Utilities&view=by_date_ascendin...

Setting field (system condition) required at work order operation level

Hi everyone,
I wanted to make 'required' system condition field at operation level, however neither it's available in OIOPL nor in OIOPD..
I'd appreciate if anyone could suggest something
Thanks in advance

Hi Sergey,
The System Condition field enables you to reserve capacity in Production Planning Work Center so that during any maintenance, Production Planning work center should not be undergoing any production.
But the system condition that is taken into account for the above scenario is the System Condition field at the header level which indicates whether the maintenance requires the equipment to be shut down or in operation so apart from the header System Condition field, the operation system condition fields do not create any capacity requirement at PP Work Center.
The Operation Sys Condition field is just for reporting purposes and does not hold any significance in PP-PM integration so for that fact there is no provision for setting this field mandatory at Operation level rather it can be set mandatory at Order header level.
Best Regards,
Muhammad Usman Kahoot

Setting PR document reference mandatory for Purchase order

Hello All,
I am facing strange problem here. I want to make PR number filed mandatory for the PO document. For NBF selection key I set it as required entry. And assigned this key to NB docuement type. But still the field is not mandatory.
Please give me solution to this problem. Is there any support pack or any other setting?
Thanks in advance
Kishor

Hello,
Follow the steps
SPRO --> Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Authorization Management --> Define Function Authorizations for Buyers
Create Function Authorization for buyers as "PO only with PR" , assign this to Buyer authorization profile..
Assign Parameter EFB thru SU01 for buyrer
Go to SU01>enter user ID> Go to Parameters-->assign that parameter value against EFB parameter( If EFB parameter ID is not there Add it and assign parameter value i.e.Function Authorisation value there
EG.01
Also make sure that
In OMET in details of function Authorization>Possible ref. objects>Tick only Ref. to purchase requisition and not anything else
I hope this will be helpfull
Reward if useful
Regards,
Kumar

ATP logic for sales order and delivery

Hi experts
Generally, the ATP quantity that having in sales order ia available to other deliveries.
I wish know if batch is allocated to sales order, is it available for other deliveries? or system will not consider for delivery ATP.
warm regards
sairam

Hi,
ATP qty is generated against the Sales Order requirement. It is not assigned to other deliveries.
If Batch is assigned to Sales Order, it will not assigned to other deliveries.
Regards,

CFC9 setting: Cross-System Update Logic for Manufacturing Orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for