Change "matches" to "contains" in search options

Hi there, when you go into your search you find all multiselect metadata preceding with "matches" and all text boxes with "contains", would anybody happen to know how to change to "contains" by default in a multiselect metadata field? we're using multiselect values in check in so search would do no good if it's restricted to "matches".
I've tried changing it in rules-general, rules-field, and doesn't make any difference.. maybe a script somewhere? please help!
Thanks

I'm not entirely sure if this is enough for what you need: By placing the configuration entry DefaultSearchOperator=hasAsSubstring in your server's config.cfg and restarting should make your default search page operator set to "Contains".
However I've noticed that if a field is based on an option list (in configuration manager), the default search operator will still be "Matches" even with the configuration entry mentioned above, since it makes sense. I don't know if the same behavior will occur with multiselect option lists, if it does you'll just have to disable the option list checkbox in the field's configuration and write a component with idoc to display a multiselect interface manually.

Similar Messages

Change search options to FILE NAME only

Is there a way to change the search options to always search for FILE NAME only?
I don't know who'd saech for contents every time, that would seem like a last resort if you couldn't find what you are originally looking for and forgot the file name. We have 10's of thousands of files and having the stupid contents pop up EACH time I want to do a search wastes so much time.
Help!

The only way to bypass the crippled Spotlight search is to use a tailored savedSearch. This is what I use. The system files allows finding things in the stupidly hidden user's Library:

Can't change search options in Outlook 2007 on Windows Server 2008R2 Remote Desktop Users

One of my users is trying to change search options in Outlook 2007.
But he can't change the search options.
He is working with Outlook 2007 on Remote Desktop Services 2008 r2.
We doen't use cache mode on terminal server.
Any sugesstion how we can enabling search options for remote desktop users ?

Hi Roel,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
To customize Instant Search options by using Group Policy
- In Group Policy, load the Office Outlook 2007 template (Outlk12.adm).
- To customize how results are displayed, under
User Configuration\Administrative Templates\Microsoft Office Outlook 2007\Tools | Options\Preferences\Search Options, double-click the setting that you want to set. For example, double-click Turn off wordwheel.
- Click Enabled. For hit highlighting color, choose a color from the Background Color drop-down list.
- Click OK.
More information.
Configure Instant Search options in Outlook 2007
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/library/cc178983(v=office.12).aspx
In addition, perform below steps to edit the registry key and check.
Step 1: Open the Registry Editor application.
Step 2: In the Registry Editor, click the Edit menu and select Find. Type PreventIndexingOutlook in the search field and click Find Next.
Step 3: Right click PreventIndexingOutlook and select Modify. Change its Value data to
0 and click OK.
Step 4: Search again by clicking the Edit menu and select Find. Type SetupCompletedSuccessfully in the search field and click Find Next. Locate this key.
Step 5: Right click the SetupCompletedSuccessfully key and select Modify. Change its Value Data to 0 and click OK.
Step 6: Restart your computer and you will now be able to perform advanced searches in Microsoft Outlook.
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

OTL timecard LOV changing search option

Hi,
Can anyone help in changing search option by value rather than display_value??
Please let me know the steps..
thanks
mallik

Hi,
BrianK197719781979 wrote:
OK Im making tiny steps forward now...
SELECT *
FROM hxc_lookups
WHERE meaning in ('Total Hours','Timecard Period End Date','Timecard Period Start Date','PO Number','Project',
'Timecard Status','Timecard Submission Date','Task','Timecard Comment')
AND lookup_type in ('HXC_TIMECARD_SEARCH_ITEMS_WRK','HXC_APPR_TIMECARD_SEARCH_ITEMS')---Query the both the lookup_type and update 'Total Hours' to as u required 'Total Days'.
---May be here u req to do vo extesnion also to change the query to:
SELECT * FROM hxc_lookups
WHERE meaning in ('Total Days','Timecard Period End Date','Timecard Period Start Date','PO Number','Project',
'Timecard Status','Timecard Submission Date','Task','Timecard Comment')
AND lookup_type in ('HXC_TIMECARD_SEARCH_ITEMS_WRK','HXC_APPR_TIMECARD_SEARCH_ITEMS')
Change:
WHERE meaning in ('Total Hours' ) to WHERE meaning in ('Total Days')
Regards
Meher Irk

Presence search option between different container

Greeting all
I notice if i belongs to cn A in AD and another user is in cn B in AD, i can`t find him using the search option via my cupc
PS: i`m using Presence version 8 and cupc v8
any thoughs how to fix that
thx

Hi,
What is your search context in CUPS LDAP profile ?
Please check under CUPS server administration --> Application --> Unified Personal Communicator --> LDAP profile
You should have a proper search context like,
dc=XYZdomain,dc=com
or
dc=XYZdomain,dc=com;&(objectclass=user)
or
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
ou=xyz,dc=XYZdomain,dc=com
or
if you have multiple OU's you can set it as,
ou=test,dc=cisco,dc=com#ou=testone,dc=cisco,dc=com#ou=testtwo,dc=cisco,dc=com
Whenever you change the search context and save you would need to logout and login back from CUPC..
Please refer for more info,
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/presence.html#wp1084996
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa746475.aspx

Change reduce the options equal, greater, greater then in search option set

Hi experts,
I create a search option set with one Allowed Predefined Properties: cm_tbp_validfrom. You can select the options =, <, <=, >, =>. For the users we will show only the options >, =>. Is this possible? and if it is how to do this?
thanks in advance,
Joeri

Good write-up ;-)

Changing How Address Book Displays Search Results

When I use Search in Address Book the result everytime shows as the bottom item in the resulting list with extraneous items above it. It seems to me that the items below the first result are more pertinent to my search, but they aren't displayed, I have to scroll down to see them. Is there a way to change that so that the top item is my first result and the items below it appear?
PowerBook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.8)

That's an interesting question, so I tried it myself.
I found that all of the cards listed contained the search term, as expected, but the term was not necessarily in the name. So there seems to be no weighting given to the location of the search term (eg Finding it in the Notes could be less important than in the name). I can't disagree with this strategy.
Secondly, the found set of cards are listed in the normal order I'd defined in the preferences 'Sort by' option, again just as expected.
So the question returns as to why the result chooses the particular card it does. And the answer seems to be that the chosen card is the last one with the most matches.
I searched for St, and got many matchiing cards, and the chosen one had 3 occurences. I looked through the list, and there were a few other cards with 3 occurences of the match, but none with 4 occurences. So the chosen card was the last one with the most matches.
I then chose a card without a match and added some notes which had 4 occurences, and the following search for St then picked that card.
So you're actually getting what you have asked for (the last of the best matches). Its just unfortunate that generally the card you want is not the one with most matches.
Andrew

Why is there no "SEARCH OPTION" in the Windows Store? Apps missing be nice if I could find them !

Since on this journey from Win 8 consumer preview to Win 8 retail preview ..And no currently trying out Win 8 Pro...It verified if it was gonna give me back ( allowed to re-download ) the apps I was used/had in previous editions. The Store gives you
a selection of YOU APPS from previous versions of the OS preview of apps you installed and currently would want to reinstall. Various versions of the Consumer preview I installed 2 out the 4 times i installed the OS seen I had installed the app Comixology.
When the first time I installed Retail preview it didn't have it in my list nor was it listed in the store! Same goes with Iheart Radio and Slacker Radio though numerous installments of the OS. Now trying out the Win 8 Pro 9200 version It showed I at
one point no matter what PC I used ( I own a few and bought a new one recently ) It showed at one point I installed Comixology. Yet it didn't show Iheart Radio or Slacker in my install list of old to reinstall nor was it even in the Store!!!! \\\So
what the hell gives ????? I mean If there was a SEARCH Option it would make it easier to track these Metro ( whatever they are calling it now -personally I think they should call it FRAMES as in Window Frames :P When you go on these
programs sites they only offer up Apple or Android app downloads and nothing mentioning of Metro or Win 8 -which is understandable due to not being released yet but still if the Store can't comply with your history of app install base ( paid or free ) and
you can't have the ability to retrieves said apps you once installed how can that be trusted if and when paid apps are bought if you are only to reinstall the entire OS and find that your app is not obtainable via offered through the main store or even in
your downloads app install history. I hope they fix this issue as it's been pissing me off since this whole testing thing!!

Sorry if I offended you by using an anecdote - the actions of kids are simply an easy way to explore the actions of adults. Growing up doesn't change base instincts. Most people (myself included) tend to have an immediate distrust of change when
it is not change that they are instigating, when it is forced upon them. What better example is there than a child, where many big decisions are made for them?
As for the new interface, I didn't catch on until it was revealed to me (or I hit my head against the wall, can't remember), so I'm not saying it is easy. Better education is needed, but going back to the old way doesn't help. The five or six
questions I have answered today are questions that I myself had, and wished someone had answered for me. This is a
drastic change from old versions of Windows. I even told my boss yesterday that I can't see his company (I'm a contractor) switching any time soon - too much new stuff to learn. That being said, once there are some good training tools available,
I do believe that this OS will be a good choice - it does feel more intuitive after only a few days of use. A training course is likely necessary for new users, however my guess is that this will wind up being a beneficial change (long-run)
for IT departments, because the system does feel more aimed towards the casual user. No matter what program you use, the search and settings are in one easy place.
I admittedly do not have a lot of files in my Skydrive, however the file that is there is purple, while the folders are blue. Not sure if all files are like that, and I really do not have the time to explore those differences. That being said,
the number in the bottom-right seems pretty self-explanatory, the number of child elements in the container. I barely remember the old Skydrive interface, however I do remember it felt clunky. Whether or not the changes are a true
improvement, it does feel more streamlined.
Metro (or whatever it is called now) is confusing. It is scary. (My word, not yours, nor am I trying to imply it.) It is definitely
different from the past. But it makes sense. Same interface on every MS product: Xbox, Windows, and Phone. Microsoft didn't exactly
pioneer this idea, either. Apple has been creeping in that direction for a while now. As I said previously, I can move around faster in the new Start menu than I could in the old, and I can actually do
more without ever putting a hand on the mouse - for anyone that is waist-deep in computers, regardless of their specific job, that tends to be a
good thing.
There are a lot of growing pains here, for both Microsoft and the consumer. Has MS gotten it right? Not yet, not entirely, but the goal is clear.
If your complaint is on broken
functionality, then I wouldn't disagree with you. There is plenty of that, and I think it was a bit foolish of Microsoft not to have a Connect site up for such things. (If I'm wrong on that, and there is one, please point me that way. I'm
still stuck with Explorer.exe crashing from click-scrolling.)
As for disliking the big changes, well, I can't agree with you on that at all. Again, it wasn't an easy transition, but now that I'm here, I don't want to go back. I want the true
bugs fixed, but not having a search bar seems more like being stuck on old ways of doing things than a real problem. That kind of thing can even lead to puking.

Webinar: Understanding TREX Indexing and Search Options

SAP NetWeaver Know-How Network Webinar:
Understanding TREX Indexing and Search Options
Wednesday 25 August 2004
11 a.m. EDT
On Wednesday 25 August, Larry Brambrut, an EP RIG Consultant, hosts the webinar titled Understanding TREX Indexing and Search Options as part of the ongoing SAP NetWeaver Know-How Network Webinar Series.
Heres how Larry describes his webinar presentation:
This session will describe the enhancements to "Search and Classification"(TREX) in NetWeaver '04 and EP 6.0 SP2 Patch 6. The session will include a discussion of the CM enhancements such as new crawlers, new search UI options and plug-ins, and TREX enhancements such as the new TREX architecture, delta indexing, and new TREX Admin Tool.
SDN invites you to post your questions to the presenter prior to the webinar and continue the online discussion afterward.
How to Participate
(Please go to the SDN webinar schedule page to find more information)
Dial-in Information:
Date: Wednesday 25 August 2004
Time: 11 a.m. EDT
Within the U.S., call: +1.888.428.4473
Outside the U.S., call: +1.651.291.0618
Password: NetWeaver04
WebEx Information:
Topic: SAP NetWeaver Know-How Network
Date: Wednesday 25 August 2004
Time: 11 a.m. EDT
Meeting Number: 742391500
Meeting Password: netweaver04 (lowercase)
WebEx Link: sap.webex.com
Replay Information:
A recorded replay of this call will be available for approximately three months after the webinar. Access this recording by dialing the appropriate number and using the replay access code 720155.
Toll-free: +1.800.475.6701
International: +1.320.365.3844

About the SAP NetWeaver Know-How Webinar Series
The SAP NetWeaver Know-How Webinar Series is driven by the SAP NetWeaver Regional Implementation Group (RIG), part of the SAP Development organization. The mission of the SAP NetWeaver RIG is to enable customers, employees, and partners to successfully implement the SAP NetWeaver solution. This SAP RIG has expertise in BI, EP, XI, and WebAS. They contribute their implementation expertise to the SDN implementation forums as well as to the SAP NetWeaver Know-How Webinar Series.
Disclaimer
SDN is not responsible for any changes to the webinar schedule. The webinar schedule may be changed or cancelled without prior notice.

Hi there,
I just read this thread, and maybe someone here can answer my current trex question:
I have created an ordinary CM repository, and created an index with this repository as source. Now the problem: I would like to exclude files in the repository with specific mimetypes from the TREX indexing process.
I have verified that the TrexValidMimetypes.ini does not contain any reference to the Mimetypes I'm creating, but never the less, the document titles are searchable and are returned when searching.
How do I get around this issue?
Is it possible in NW04 or EP6.0 SP3 PXXX??
Regards,
Hco

Multiple searching options

hi experts,
i need to create one searching iview but has multiple search options. The purpose is to let the user search for documents using one iView only (we have many types of documents with different metadata). We try to separate the options by tab. Is it possible? We are using SAPNetweaver portal 7.0.
Thanks,
Rgds,
Nanie Arianie

Hi Shah,
You can achive the above said by creating separate indexes for the folders containing the documents.
Follow the following steps,
1.Create separate indexes for the KM folders under the following path in Portal,
System Administration > System Configuration > Knowledge Management > Index Management
If you want to group the indexes , you have to specify the group name during creation of the index.
Add the folder as a Data Source to the respective indexes.
2.Create Search Options Set under the following path and mention the indexes or search index group in it.
System Administration > System Configuration > Knowledge Management > Content Management > User Interface >
(Change the mode to advanced) select Search >Search Option Set ,
Select the standard UI Search Option set and click on duplicate button , give a name to the new search option set.
Add the indexes created to index option in Option set.
3.Create Search Component Set under the following path and this can be used in iview properties,
System Administration > System Configuration > Knowledge Management > Content Management > User Interface >
(Change the mode to advanced) select Search > Search Component Set,
Select the standard UISearchComponents and create a duplicate copy of the same and give a custom name to the same.
4.Create iview from application or copy search iview from the standard content.After creating the iview update the properties with the above created option set and component set.
Option set will establish a connectivity between the iview and the created indexes..
Advanced Search UI and results can be customized by customizing the Search component set and Layout sets.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
RD,
Rudradev Devulapelli.

Change "Bing" from the defalt search engine setting 2. How can I have snipping tool on taskbar

Can you please tell me how I can change Bing as the default search engine setting on my browser? I have checked the internet option and account setting. It doesn't seem it can be done.

Refer this :
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-in/windows/change-choose-internet-explorer-search-provider#1TC=windows-7
For snipping tool :
When you open the tool, on task-bar, right click and click on Pin the program on Task bar.
Arnav Sharma | http://arnavsharma.net/ Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
the thread.

I'm not able to do the DELETE and the SEARCH options on my list ( HELP!! )

import java.io.*;
public class StudentContactManager
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException
char userSelection;
final int maxStudents = 10;
String [] Lname = new String [maxStudents];//LName= Last Name
String [] FName= new String [maxStudents];//FName=First Name
String [] En= new String [maxStudents];//En = Enrolment Number
String [] PhoneNo= new String [maxStudents];
int activeEntries = 0;
boolean found = false;
//================================
System.out.println ( "1 - Initialise contact detail list" );
System.out.println ( "2 - Display contact details list" );
System.out.println ( "3 - Insert new entry into cotact detail list" );
System.out.println ( "4 - Delete entry from contact detail list" );
System.out.println ( "5 - Search cotact detail list" );
System.out.println ( "Q - Quit" );
System.out.print ( "Option : " );
userSelection = Text.readChar ( "Enter option" );
while ( userSelection != 'Q' & userSelection != 'q' )
switch ( userSelection )
case '1': activeEntries=0 ;
break;
case '2': if (activeEntries > 0)//IF contact detail list contains entries
System.out.println("\tEnrolment Number\tFirst Name\tSecond Name\tTelephone Number");
for (int i = 0; i<activeEntries; i ++)//FOR each stored contact
{//DO
System.out.println();
System.out.println("\t"+En[i]+"\t"+"\t"+FName[i]+ Lname[i]+"\t"+"\t"+PhoneNo);//Display one/current contact detail
}//END-FOR
else
{// ELSE
System.out.println("Contact detail list empty");//Display �Contact detail list empty� message
}//END-IF
break;
case '3': if(activeEntries<maxStudents)
En[activeEntries]= Text.readString("Enter enrolment number");
found = false;
int i = 0;
while ( !found && i < activeEntries)
if (En[i].equals(En[activeEntries]) )
found = true;
else
i++;
}//end-if
}//end-while
if (found == false)
FName[activeEntries]=Text.readString("Enter first name");
Lname[activeEntries]=Text.readString("Enter last name");
PhoneNo[activeEntries]=Text.readString("Enter telephone number");
// Insert new contact details into contact detail list
activeEntries++;
else
System.out.println("Enrolment number already exists");
else
System.out.println("Contact detail list full");
break;
case '4': Text.showMessage("Selected Option 4");
break;
case '5':Text.showMessage("Selected option 5");
default: Text.showMessage("invalid selection, Please input a valid option");
break;
}//switch
userSelection = Text.readChar ( "Enter option" );
}//while
System.exit(0);
}//main
}//StudentContactManager
//===============================================================================
I need help with case 4 and case 5...the search option should include while statement. and the 5th case is the delete option
Thanks guys =).

Please use the code tags when posting code (there is a button on the posting page for them). It would also help if you told us what you are trying to do, what error you are getting, and what you expect to get.
If you are just asking us to write the code for you, then you are in the wrong place.

Search option in status report

Hi,
I have a requirement where I need to add a search option for date range to a CRM report that is fetching a list of mails along with their statuses and associated processing time.
Now, currenty the list is too long and as a result the report is timing out. In order to cut down on the running time, we need to add a date range search option to filter the records/mails by week etc.
However, at present the select query fetching the tasks is being called in a standard FM (RH_GENERAL_TASKS_GET) and taking sy-datum (hard-coded) as search_date value/parameter. It's actually a chain of function modules called from within SWL_INBOX_VIEW_CREATE.
Now, if we need to tweak the select query to give the entered date range, we might have to copy all the standard FMs into custom ones and change the last one.
I am looking for an alternative solution to this.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Mohit

Hi,
You can't apply formatted search in that parameter window.
Rahul

Using "Restrict by app" in change query causes issues with Search Results

Hello!
I am hoping some experienced SP admin can help me out. I am having issues with the relevance ranking for my search results web part.
I created a Wiki (OOTB) within a site collection and on the home page of the Wiki I was looking to apply a Search Box and Search Results web part for easy searching. I wanted to ensure the search results were restricted to the scope of the pages within the
wiki. I did the following after adding the 2 web parts:
Entered edit mode for the page
Started to edit the Search Results web part
Under Properties for Search Results clicked on "Change Query"
Navigated to BASICS and clicked "Switch to Quick Mode"
For Select Query, picked "Wiki (System)" option
For Restrict by app, picked "Specify a URL" and input the wiki URL "http://webapp.com/sites/sitecollection/wiki"
Click OK
The web part has 6 automatic results when I hit the page. These are the only 6 pages in my wiki. When I search a word or title of a page, they are not ranked in order or relevance. The ordering is static to what was being shown before the search, but the
keywords I'm searching are bold. With out the taking the steps above, I can easily search these pages and have them ranked appropriately so I'm not too sure what I'm doing wrong.
Other Details
The pages have been crawled and can be searched from anywhere else in SP.
I am only a site collection admin for this specific site collection.
I other than the steps above, I have not made any changes or customization to the search web parts; they are both out of the box SP.
The SP Farm admin we unable to pin point what the root cause is either.

Hi Mikael,
Sorry for the wait, I was unable to post pictures, which i felt would better describe my issue.
Could you output the query template you are ending up with?
If you can tell me how to accomplish this, then I can provide it. Please keep in mind that I am only a site collection admin.
Also, is the ranking/sorting for your webpart set to ranking?
When looking at the web part settings, I didn't see an option to modify the ranking. Unfortunately, some sites in my intranet are down now so I can't even double check. Once it's back up, I will verify this as well.
And how do you know they are ranked incorrectly?
I wanted to display an image showing what I meant by this. As the wiki is down, I'll do my best with words. When I visit the wiki home page, I already have the search and search results web parts there. Without searching anything, the search results
web part displays 6 pages that are available in the wiki. When I search, I expect to see the most relevant result at the top. similar to the following:
*Search result from another section of the intranet site.*
What I receive instead is the same list of wiki pages, in the same order. The most relevant result
is not moved to the top like in the image above, but I can see that the word "rush" is highlighted in bold. I hope this helps.
If you need more of a description, please let me know.
Thank you

Query in Tool Bar Area Searching option.

Hi All,
There is a tool bar Searching iView with us.But when any user searches through it, the search option is working fine.But the results shows files with open folder and details option (as we do not want some user go inside details option and change the permissions settings of that file).Can anyone tell me how can we remove open folder and details options??
Regards,
Udit

Hi,
The UI Command Group resposible to show Open Folder, See Also and Details Commands is SearchSingleItemGroup.
So open it and remove the browse_from_here and SingleDetailsGroup(expanded) UICommands.
choose System Administration --> System Configiuration --> KM --> Content Management --> User Interface --> Commands --> UI Command Group.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/9d/233f989a5ba64fa44ed6e0823286ee/frameset.htm
Greetings,
Praveen Gudapati

Change "matches" to "contains" in search options

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for